Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
INTRODUCTION:
Rome, which means “power” in Greek, was without question the most influential city in
the world during the first century of the common era. So it is only fitting that Paul, the author of
Romans, would make this the destination of what many would regard as his most significant letter.
In Romans, there are many different passages that speak simple truths about the cores of
Christianity. Romans 8:31-39 is one such passage. We will be discussing this passage in depth
later in the essay. We will both observe and interpret. But first, in order to put this into context,
we must understand the background of Romans and what was occurring at this time.
Paul was raised in Hebrew tradition, and as a young man became an extremely radical
Pharisee. He jailed and persecuted countless Christians and it wasn’t until a miraculous run-in
with God on the road to Damascus that Paul changed his life around. And did he ever. Paul
became “the apostle to the Gentiles” spreading the words of Christ throughout Greece and much of
the East.
Paul wrote his letter to the Romans in approximately 57 of the common era. The letter
itself was probably written from Corinth where Paul was staying for three months after recently
completing two to three years of hard labour in Ephesus. However, Paul’s intentions for writing
are not as easy to identify. There are a couple of theories. The first is that this marked a
transitional period in Paul’s life. Paul had been working in the East for his entire ministry, and
was now preparing to take on the west in general, and Spain in particular. Paul in his letter was
trying to solicit the support of the Romans in both prayer and action. He wanted the Romans to
start the work in the west for him, so that by the time he arrived, there would be a foundation. A
second theory is that this was a “last will and testament” for Paul. Before Paul ever was to set off
for the west, he had to deliver a large sum of money to the needy in Jerusalem. He was unsure of
how his gift would be received, and was fearful that he may be harmed or killed. Some believe
that this was a petition for prayer, but also a creed of his beliefs. Because of this theory, while
it is assumed that Phoebe delivered Paul’s letter to the Roman church, it is a common thought that
other copies of the letter were made and sent to churches throughout Europe as a lasting memory.
Regardless of which theory or combination of theories actually is true, Paul, who was both a
Roman and a Jew, wanted to inform the Romans of his intention to visit should he survive in
Jerusalem.
GEOGRAPHY:
Rome is located at the heart of what is today the country of Italy. Italy is a country with
many hills, mountains and valleys. The city of Rome itself was built upon seven hills: the
Capitoline, Aventine, Caelian, Esquiline, Palatine, Quirinal, and Viminal. None of these hills ever
At the peak of her power, the Roman Empire controlled land that literally surrounded the
Mediterranean Sea. The Empire spread from Israel in the east, down through northern Africa, up
through Spain and Britain, through Greece and back down to Israel.
Rome was a very accessible city with large harbors very close by. There is a saying that
“all roads lead to Rome”, and that’s important because Rome was the trade center for the world at
this time. While we will discuss this later, the location of Rome was significant. Not only did
Italy’s largest river, the Tiber River, run through the city, Rome was located near large bodies of
HISTORY:
Rome was built in the year of 753 before the common era and was governed by kings until
between 600 and 500 before the common era. After the monarchy, a republic was formed. The
republic was mixed with other various forms of government until in 31 B.C.E. the empire was
How Christianity first spread to Rome is uncertain. Peter and Paul had not yet preached
there. However there was a large Jewish community in Rome, estimated with between 40,000 and
50,000 people. This large Jewish population was directly linked to Pompey’s take over of Judea.
The common belief is that there were Jews from Rome present at the Pentecost. These Jews would
have converted to Christianity and brought back to Rome the Good News.
However, conflict met the new converts immediately upon returning to Rome. The conflict
occurred between the Jews who believed that Jesus was the Messiah and the Jews who did not.
Constant fighting occurred and it is believed that this “rioting” was the reason that the Jews were
banished from Rome by Claudius in about 50 B.C.E. The ban was lifted and eventually some of
the Jews returned to Rome. However, there was a significant difference in the church. In Rome,
there had been many “God-fearers” who readily accepted the gospel upon hearing it and joined the
church. Many Romans had come to faith in the time of Jewish banishment and the Jews
were now the minority in the church while the Gentiles were the majority. In fact, throughout the
world there seemed to be a trend of Gentiles coming to Christ while the Jewish people rejected
Him.
Additionally, the Roman upper-class had become very upset at the favorable treatment the
Jews had received from the emperors, most notably from earlier emperor’s such as Julius Caesar
and Augustus. Factor in the huge population of the Jewish community and the rapid number of
converts to a Jewish religion, and you get the reason why there was contempt among many.
Emperor Nero was among these individuals, and in his time would cause much heartache and
trouble for the Jewish population.
Perhaps because of these two things there was becoming a noticeable division between the
Gentiles and Jews. Many of the Gentiles were arrogant, or at least indifferent towards the Jews.
This attitude was becoming more and more prevalent when Paul wrote his letter and maybe this is
CULTURE:
Rome was the largest city in the Roman Empire with a population upwards of one million
people. Because it was the biggest and most influential city, and because it was so important for
world trade and economy, it naturally both influenced and was influenced by the differing cultures
and people who visited. The sphere of influence was huge, without question. And while the
culture was distinctly Roman, one does not have to look far to see elements of Greek culture
Architecture:
Architecture was also greatly influenced by the Greeks. However, while they borrowed the
basic designs, Rome added their own flair with unique arches, domes, vaults and extensions. The
civil engineering within the city was among the best in the world and the Roman use of concrete
was also revolutionary in its durability and stability. This is displayed by the fact that the majority
Entertainment:
Entertainment was an important element of Roman culture. Much like Greece, the theatre
was very important to the Romans. For example, the Circus Maximus seated up to 250,000
people! And with regularity Rome hosted parties for the poor where free food and free
entertainment were provided.
Social Class:
There were many different social classes within Rome, and there was much disparity
between them. The rich were very rich, while the poor were very poor. Slavery was a way of life
in Rome, and slaves were expected to blindly follow the orders of their superiors without
hesitation. One interesting aspect of this culture was how freely the women of society were
allowed to move about. Much like modern society, there were very few restriction on
women, and they were allowed to go shopping, gossip, or attend the theatre without having to
yield. Immigration to Rome was also higher than normal, which is not surprising considering the
Economy:
Rome was in its time what New York City is in our time. The economic world revolved
around Rome. Since there was very little fertile soil, Rome used what it had – many harbors and
much land. Rome was located virtually in the center of its empire, and thus was able to control
and monitor much of the world’s economy. It was because of this economic stronghold that many
Roman ideas began to spread throughout the world. As various businessmen came to Rome they
The government was very important to the Romans. In fact, the state, not religion, was
given the most prominent and important role in Roman society. The emperors were often thought
Roman law was also extremely important and revered. The Romans realized this was the
means of guidance and order. The law was so important to the Romans that they took the law with
them wherever they went. For example, once they had conquered a nation, not only did they
follow the Roman law, they imposed that law upon the conquered. It was of utmost importance.
Roman law was greatly influenced by the Greeks, and has in turn influenced modern
Western culture. For example, the philosophy of “innocent until proven guilty” is found within
Roman law.
Religion:
Rome was an extremely diverse city. There were many different religions and most were
tolerated to varying degrees. The most common religion among the natives of Rome was very
closely tied to Greek mythology. Most of the gods and goddesses were virtually the same with
Latinized names. Among the favorites were Mars and Venus. Many of the followers of this belief
did not understand Christianity. The Romans had no problem adding gods to their ever-expanding
list of deities, so many viewed Christians as atheists because they only had one God. Others just
merely shrugged off Christianity as superstition. Still, the Christian church was rapidly growing at
the time of Paul’s letter. In fact, Paul had hoped to make Rome his missionary “home base” for
Romans is a book that was written in a time of uncertainty. Paul wrote it uncertain of his
future fate. Emperor Nero had recently come to power, and there was a lot of uncertainty of what
all that would mean for the Jews and the church in general. And there was a lot of questions as to
why Gentiles were flocking to a Jewish religion that the Jews were outright rejecting. It was a
letter written on the eve of significant change with nobody knowing what that change was going to
be. What I find interesting is that during this time of questioning Paul writes a letter of affirmation
about what he does know and believe in. He clings to the very things dearest to him and
church and the North American church. Like Rome, North America is the economic superpower
of the world. The world revolves around our continent and the influence we have is huge! Like
the church of Rome, we often find our church divided and splitting up over minor, insignificant
issues. Like the Roman believers, we as Christians are often scorned for having the idea of “one
God” and being “narrow-minded.” Just like the Roman culture tolerated Christianity along with
all other religions, our society has taken the same approach. Like Rome, there is a spiritual hunger
and longing within our nations, a hunger that is forcing an openness. Finally, like both Paul and
the church of Rome, we are at a point in history where there is a lot of uncertainty, and we don’t
I think with all of these similarities, the book of Romans is extremely relevant and
important. I think it shows us the importance of remembering in whom believe, what we believe
and why we believe, so that when we don’t have all the answers, at least we know something. And
looking at the book of Romans, that something can make all the difference in the world.
INTERPRETATION OF ROMANS 8:31-39:
Verse 31-34
This passage opens up with the question, “What can we say about such wonderful
things as these?” But what are “these”? Douglas Moo, in The Epistle to the Romans
commentary, says this: “Since Paul has been enumerating these blessing from virtually
the first verses of the letter, this paragraph could be the climax of the letter up to this
point. At the other extreme, ‘these things’ in v. 31 could refer only to those blessings
enumerate in the immediately preceding verses (28 or 29-30). But the similarity between
the language and the contents of this passage and Rom. 5 suggests rather that this
paragraph, while responding immediately to what Paul has been saying in chap.8, and
assurance in chaps. 5-8 as a whole.” I personally could see this passage as being the
destination that Paul was heading for when he started writing the book of Romans.
Regardless though, I definitely think that “these” refers to more than the preceding few
verses and is a joyous cry for the many wonderful things Paul has talked about since at
least chapter 5.
In these verses Paul asks many rhetorical questions to make his point. He uses
contrast and question and answer. For example, in verse 33, Paul asks “Who dares
accuse us whom God has chosen for his own? Will God?” He then answers himself
saying, “No! He is the one who has given us right standing with himself.” At this point in
the passage he is talking in very general terms, but his point is still clear – “God is for
us”.
Verse 35-37
Adam Clarke in his commentary says this in regards to verse 35: “I do think that
this question [‘Who shall separate us from the love of Christ?’] has been highly
misunderstood . . . he speaks of the love of the followers of God to that who had first love
them. Therefore the question is not, Who shall separate the love of Christ from us? or
prevent Christ from loving us? but, Who shall separate us from the love of Christ?” I’m
not sure I entirely agree with this statement by Clarke. I think what Paul is trying to say
is that God’s love is so much bigger than anything we can comprehend. He then goes on
and lists several things – calamity, danger, death, trouble, and hunger -- that often seem
so huge that they separate us from God, just to enforce his point that regardless of how
we feel there is nothing that can separate us from God. It is in verse 35 that Paul starts to
move away from the general sentences and moves to specific, personal examples.
One very interesting word in verse 35 is “love” which comes from the Greek
word “Agape”. It means “brotherly love, affection, good will, benevolence”. It is not a
syrupy kind of gooey love, but rather a deep desire to see the best for a person that you
care deeply about. In context of the rest of the paragraph, I think this really makes a lot
of sense. I think this paragraph is saying that although trouble may become us, it’s not
that God doesn’t care. He still “loves” us and has “affection and good will” towards us.
Another thing that I found really intriguing in this verse was the use of the word
“trouble”. To me, “calamity” and “trouble” sound pretty similar. They are both words
that could be used when in distress or when you’re caught in a dangerous place. But the
word “trouble” is used for the Greek word “Limos” which means “a pressing, pressing
together, “pressure”. To me, this takes on a whole new meaning. Pressure and pressing,
they aren’t always distress or desperate cries the way that calamity and trouble are. They
are things that wear on you, that eat you up inside. They are the tiny day-to-day things
that suffocate you. I think what the passage is saying is that “yes, Christ’s love
transcends and meets your desperate cries. But Christ’s love also transcends and meets
you at your point of frustration, at the point where you feel like the world is pressing in
on you, and you’ve got the weight of the world on your shoulders.”
In verse 36, Paul refers to Psalm 44:22. When you look back at the entire Psalm,
you see how the writer very distraught when he is writing this. He is weary and he is
suffering for no apparent reason. He is pleading for God to show up and start acting.
This is what Paul wants us to remember right before he says, “No, despite all these
things, overwhelming victory is ours through Christ, who loved us.” He wants us to
remember our lowest points, and taken assurance in the knowledge that although we have
these things happen to us, Christ love and victory are constant and unchanging.
In verse 37, Paul answers the question he posed in verse 35 when he says, “No,
despite all these things, overwhelming victory is ours through Christ, who loved us.”
Matthew Henry in his commentary says this: “We are conquerors by virtue of Christ’s
victory. We have nothing to do but to pursue the victory, and to divide the spoils.”
“Love” is again used in verse 37, but it comes from a different Greek word than
previously talked about in verse 35. Whereas the use of love in verses 35 and 39 speak of
“affection” and “good will”, the “love” in verse 37 comes from the Greek word Agapao,
which means, “to welcome, to entertain, to be fond of, to love dearly.” This is the gooey
love that God has for you. This paragraph shows two different sides of God’s love that
co-exists even during our most challenging and our darkest times.
Throughout this entire passage there is a very joyous, very excited tone, and I
think it perhaps comes out the strongest in this verse. It is a shout of victory! Paul is
already throwing a celebration, knowing full well of the overwhelming victory that is
soon to be his. He just couldn’t hold his enthusiasm inside any longer.
Verse 38, 39
The answer to the questions posed in verses 31-34 are all answered in verses 38
and 39: “And I am convinced that nothing can ever separate us from his love.” In case
there is any room for doubt, Paul contrasts figures of speech to make his point crystal
clear. “Death can’t and life can’t. The angels can’t, and the demons can’t. Our fears for
today, our worries about tomorrow, and even the powers of hell can’t keep God’s love
away. Whether we are high above the sky or in the deepest ocean, nothing in all creation
will ever be able to separate us from the love of God that is revealed in Christ Jesus our
Lord.” Matthew Henry says this: “And here he [Paul] enumerates all those things which
might separate between Christ and believers, and concludes that it could not be done.”
One thing that I really found interesting was the contrasting of “death” and “life”
are contrasted. But I don’t really believe that these English words do justice to what Paul
is trying to say. The word “death” is used for the Greek word “Thanatos”. “Thanatos”
c) since the nether world, the abode of the dead was conceived as
being very dark, it is the equivalent to the region of thickest
darkness.”
On the other hand “life” comes from the Greek word “Zoe” which can be defined as:
original Greek though, they meant so much more. There was a much deeper spiritual
realm to them. I think what Paul is saying in these verses is that complete and utter
darkness, even the depths, cannot squelch God’s love for us. And on the flipside, life, not
simply as just breathing, but truly living, it is not greater than God’s love for us either.
The very things that make up human existence, they are flattened when compared against
the love that God has for each one of us. In this part of the passage, Paul goes to all
lengths, and gives us every example he can think of to show how God’s love is greater
APPLICATION:
So how does this apply to us today? I think probably the biggest lesson we need
to learn and remember from this is that God is on our side. He loves us, both with good
will and affection. Regardless of the circumstances around us, regardless of the light or
Events may sometimes happen that make us doubt God and question if He is
there. The shooting at Columbine and the attacks on the World Trade Centers are two
recent examples. We wonder where a loving God is in the midst of all of this. But we
On an individual level, when you’ve fallen and made so many mistakes and done
so many wrong things and you’re at the point where you feel like you’re just too messed
up to talk to God, when you are at the darkest place you can imagine, you still cannot be
Or perhaps it’s nothing that you’ve done, but for whatever reason you have
descended into an emotional hell. You can’t see God. You feel abandoned. There seems
to be no escape, and you are pressed, pressured and about to break. Even in the midst of
This last example for me is the one that hits home the most. It’s something I’ve
been through, and it was absolutely the roughest time in my life. It’s something that I’m
not convinced I am entirely out of either. I felt abandoned by God and like I wasn’t
worth the effort or time. I felt like He had better things to do, and although he maybe
didn’t put me where I was, He wasn’t going to come rescue me. I think that this is why
discovering the Greek word “Limos” was such a cool thing for me. I was never in
“trouble”, so to speak. But there was such an intense pressing and such a crushing
pressure. To know that even in the midst of that I was not separated from Christ’s love,
means a lot.
many Christians. If death cannot separate humanity from Christ’s love, and if demons
cannot separate humanity from Christ’s love, if fears and worries cannot separate
humanity and God’s love, why do we often not show Christ’s love? Why do we live in
such a way that we feel there are things to where Christ’s love does not extend. I have to
think that if Paul were writing today he would say something like “homosexuality cannot
separate us from Christ’s love”, or “abortion cannot separate us from Christ’s love”.
Christ’s love is constant. We need to remember that. There is nowhere it doesn’t reach,
I’m really glad I got to understand this verse a little bit better. I think there is a lot of truth
to it, probably more than I even realize. But I think and hope that even while do this essay, some
of this truth buried deep inside me, and that I will begin to accept and come to terms with the love
Barton, Bruce B., et al., eds. Life Application Bible Commentary. Wheaton, Illinois: Tyndale House Publishers, 1992
Berrett, LaMar C., Discovering the World of the Bible. Provo, Utah: Brigham Young University Press, 1974
Bromiley, Geoffrey W., et al., eds. The International Standard Bible Encyclopedia. Grand Rapids, Michigan:
William B. Eerdman’s Publishing Company, 1979
Coleman, William L., Today’s Handbook of Bible Times and Customs. Minneapolis: Bethany House Publishers, 1984
Crosby, Rena L., The Geography of Bible Lands. New York: The Abingdon Press, 1921
Dowley, Tim, Atlas of the Bible and Christianity. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Baker Books, 1997
G belein, Frank E., The Expositor’s Bible Commentary. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Zondervan, 1976
Hale, William Harlon, The Horizon Book of Ancient Rome. New York: Americcan Heritage Publishing Co., 1966
Hawthorne, Gerald F., Dictionary of Paul and His Letters. Downers Grover, Illinois: Intervarsity Press, 1993
Moo, Douglas, The Epistle to the Romans. Grand Rapids, Michigan: William B. Eerdman’s Publishing Company, 1996
Robertson, A.T., et al., eds. The Bethany Parallel Commentary On The New Testament. Minneapolis: Bethany House
Publishers, 1983
Steele, David N., Romans: An Interpretive Outline. Philadelphia: The Presbyterian and Reformed Publishing Co., 1963
Unger, Merrill F., Unger’s Bible Handbook. Chicago: Moody Press, 1967