Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
Concept of Training
personal experiences.
motivated.
2
updated.
Employees Development:
functioning efficiently.
employees:
the organization.
knowledgeable staff.
new programs.
• Increased productivity.
Training Methods
from the boss to the lowest level staff gets on the job
Off the job Training: In off the job training the workers
costly.
in their job
of jobs so that he or she can get a good idea for the tasks
Development?
have.
employee development.
Operational Definition
follows.
Employees’ performance
Purpose of Research
Islamabad.
CHAPTER 2
LITERATURE REVIEW
(Mintzberg, 1971).
financial gain.
methods.
products.
So, why would an organization not welcome and seek out the
1999).
chat with each one and see what they really want to do in
years in the company and ask for their help in training the
them the understanding that you need their help and know-
Boudreau 1997).
(Banson, 2003).
successful, and ensuring that they can do the jobs set out
Pakistani market.
employees.
employees.
employees.
CHAPTER 3
Research instrument
the results.
Population
Sample design
Sample size
organizations.
1= strongly agree
2= agree
4= disagree
5= strongly disagree
Type of study
find the reasons how and in which way T&D programs affect
distributed but the sample sizes are small enough that the
Regression Analysis
variables.
of employees.
Correlation Analysis
correlation.
Hypotheses
CHAPTER 4
Above 30 results
Table 4.1.1
Regression
Coefficients(a)
Unstandardized Standardized
Model Coefficients Coefficients t Sig.
Std.
B Error Beta
1 (Constant) 1.383 .505 2.739 .011
TD .679 .129 .705 5.259 .000
a Dependent Variable: Performance
Table 4.1.2
Correlations
Performance TD
Performance Pearson Correlation 1 .705(**)
Sig. (2-tailed) . .000
N 30 30
TD Pearson Correlation .705(**) 1
Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .
N 30 30
** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
Below 30 results
Table 4.1.3
Regression
Coefficients(a)
Unstandardized Standardized
Model Coefficients Coefficients t Sig.
Std.
B Error Beta
1 (Constant) 3.241 .362 8.940 .000
TD .236 .092 .384 2.566 .014
a Dependent Variable: Performance
senior employees.
34
Table 4.1.4
Correlations
Performance TD
Performance Pearson Correlation 1 .384(*)
Sig. (2-tailed) . .014
N 40 40
TD Pearson Correlation .384(*) 1
Sig. (2-tailed) .014 .
N 40 40
Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).
Married results
employees:
35
Table 4.2.1
Regression
Coefficients (a)
Unstandardized Standardized
Model Coefficients Coefficients t Sig.
Std.
B Error Beta
1 (Constant) 2.848 .398 7.150 .000
TD .320 .102 .463 3.138 .003
a Dependent Variable: Performance
Table 4.2.2
Correlations
Performance TD
Performance Pearson Correlation 1 .463(**)
Sig. (2-tailed) . .003
N 38 38
TD Pearson Correlation .463(**) 1
Sig. (2-tailed) .003 .
N 38 38
** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
36
Single results
Table 4.2.3
Regression
Coefficients(a)
Unstandardized Standardized
Model Coefficients Coefficients t Sig.
Std.
B Error Beta
1 (Constant) 1.838 .514 3.576 .001
TD .582 .130 .632 4.467 .000
a Dependent Variable: Performance
37
unmarried employees.
Table 4.2.4
Correlations
Performance TD
Performance Pearson Correlation 1 .632(**)
Sig. (2-tailed) . .000
N 32 32
TD Pearson Correlation .632(**) 1
Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .
N 32 32
** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
Gender base group was divided into two groups which are
Female results
Hypotheses formulated in this group are stated as under:
Table 4.3.1
Regression
Coefficients(a)
Standardize
d
Unstandardized Coefficient
Model Coefficients s t Sig.
Std.
B Error Beta
1 (Constant) 2.588 .464 5.580 .000
TD .391 .113 .515 3.449 .002
a Dependent Variable: Performance
Table 4.3.2
Correlations
Performance TD
Performance Pearson Correlation 1 .515(**)
Sig. (2-tailed) . .002
N 35 35
TD Pearson Correlation .515(**) 1
Sig. (2-tailed) .002 .
N 35 35
** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
Males results
Following are the hypotheses formed to figure out the
in different organizations.
Table 4.3.3
Regression
Coefficients (a)
Unstandardized Standardized
Model Coefficients Coefficients t Sig.
Std.
B Error Beta
1 (Constant) 2.386 .472 5.051 .000
TD .440 .126 .520 3.498 .001
a Dependent Variable: Performance
employees.
Table 4.3.4
Correlations
Performance TD
Performance Pearson Correlation 1 .520(**)
Sig. (2-tailed) . .001
N 35 35
TD Pearson Correlation .520(**) 1
Sig. (2-tailed) .001 .
N 35 35
** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
41
CHAPTER 5
Conclusion
skills.
44
RECOMMENDATIONS
accordingly.
they can communicate with each other and managers can get
of junior employees.
References
624
(www.employeeretentionguide.com
pp.80-97
organization.
sciences,5(5),pp 484-488.
Volume 19.
University.
4(2), pp.209-216.
50
APPENDIX A
Employees Performance
Respondent profile:
1. Gender
[1] Male
[2] Female
2. Marital status
[1] Married
[2] Single
3. Age: Years
4. Designation : __________________
Objectives:
the employees.
the employees.
development.
employees requirements.
Keys:
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
Development programs.
1 2 3 4 5
compare to untrained.
1 2 3 4 5
standards.
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
the employees.
1 2 3 4 5
53
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
solution quickly?
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
54
1 2 3 4 5