0 evaluări0% au considerat acest document util (0 voturi)
167 vizualizări1 pagină
This document contains a rubric for evaluating programming assignments. It assesses programs based on 5 categories: adherence to standards, modular design, correctness of code, efficiency of code, and timeliness of completion. Each category lists the criteria for excellent, good, satisfactory, and needs improvement scores. Correctness of code is weighted more heavily, counting as double.
This document contains a rubric for evaluating programming assignments. It assesses programs based on 5 categories: adherence to standards, modular design, correctness of code, efficiency of code, and timeliness of completion. Each category lists the criteria for excellent, good, satisfactory, and needs improvement scores. Correctness of code is weighted more heavily, counting as double.
Drepturi de autor:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Formate disponibile
Descărcați ca DOCX, PDF, TXT sau citiți online pe Scribd
This document contains a rubric for evaluating programming assignments. It assesses programs based on 5 categories: adherence to standards, modular design, correctness of code, efficiency of code, and timeliness of completion. Each category lists the criteria for excellent, good, satisfactory, and needs improvement scores. Correctness of code is weighted more heavily, counting as double.
Drepturi de autor:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Formate disponibile
Descărcați ca DOCX, PDF, TXT sau citiți online pe Scribd
Computer - III Name:_________________________________________ Date:____________
Teacher: Andrew Steven A. Bass Score:___________
Category Excellent Good Satisfactory Needs Improvement Score
(4 pts.) (3 pts.) (2pts.) (1 pt.) Adherence to No errors Minor details of Significant details of Misses the point of the standards are the standards or the the problem. standards violated, or poor underlying program choices are made intent are violated, Does it conform to where the but the program still standards in every standards are fulfils essential detail? functions. unclear
Breakdown No errors 1-3 minor errors More than three
minor errors OR one More than one major error (modular design) major error
Does it demonstrate good modular design?
Correctness of code Works
correctly in Works for typical input, may fail for Fails for typical input, for a minor Fails for typical input, for a all cases. minor special cases. reason. significant reason. Does it work?
This category counts
double
Efficiency of code No errors 1-3 minor errors More than three
minor errors OR one More than one major error major error Does it use the language features well?
Program is Program is finished Program is finished Program is finished
Fast coding finished 10 exactly with the 10 min after the 20 min after the min. before allotted time allotted time. allotted time. Is the programmer at the allotted ease with the time. language?