Essay: With close reference to Dracula, how far do you

agree with the assertion that Gothic literature is

concerned with transgression and the breaking of
boundaries?

Some points that you could consider:

 Dracula’s own transgressive nature, including states of

liminality – life/death; human/animal (evolution/atavism);
corporeal/non-corporeal; eponymous character/threat
behind the action.

 The breaking of social codes, especially gendered behaviour

– Jonathan as victim (both anticipating and fearing the
vampire women); the vampire women; Lucy’s behaviour
regarding proposals, in Whitby and as the ‘Bloofer Lady’.

 The presentation of social class in the novel – the values

associated with characters from particular classes and
countries.

 The structure of the novel – blurring the boundaries

between what is real (authentic) and what is not.

Remember:

 Do not just describe transgressive elements of the novel.

Consider how and to what effect Stoker uses transgression.
Does he present transgression as pleasurable and desirable,
or is the reader warned against it? Is Stoker reaffirming
boundaries in any way?

 Some links to contextual concerns will be useful for higher

marks. Consider the Victorian preoccupation with
science/religion, the role of women, sexuality and death.
 Keep a separate record of any quotations you use that you
can refer back to for revision purposes.