Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
The moral rationale behind abolition was mostly due to its inhumane nature. Christians
of the Baptist denomination in the North were pro-abolition and preached that God would not
“condone treating one race as superior to another”. Mormons preached that “it is not right that
any man should be in bondage one to another”. Catholicism, in general, was also against
slavery. Pope Gregory XVI published in 1839 “[We]... admonish and adjure in the Lord all
believers in Christ, of whatsoever condition, that no one hereafter may dare unjustly to molest
Indians, Negroes, or other men of this sort; or to spoil them of their goods; or to reduce them to
slavery; or to extend help or favour to others who perpetuate such things against them; or to
excuse that inhuman trade by which Negroes, as if they were not men, but mere animals,
howsoever reduced to slavery, are, without any distinction, contrary to the laws of justice and
humanity, bought, sold, and doomed sometimes to the most severe and exhausting labours.” The
general consensus behind the moral reasons for abolition was that it was inhumane and against
The political rationale was more complicated than the moral rationale. The North had a
highly slave independent society, while the South was extremely dependent on slave labor. The
Union was divided in it's apparent morality. One reason that abolitionist felt politically inclined
was due to the image that slavery gave America. It went against the what America stood for and
could hinder its political purity. Not only did it give America a bad world appearance, it divided
the nation on a crucial issue. When both halves of the country have different core values and
economic systems, differences in other categories also become more apparent. This eventually
Lincoln showed that he was against any existence of slavery in America or any of its
future territories. He gave the rationale that the founding father's ordained that “no persons
should be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law,” under the assumption
2. According to his First Inaugural in 1861, what was Lincoln's primary objective when he
took office?
Lincoln believed that the Union was founded prior to the Declaration of Independence
and its virtues should continue to stand throughout its revisions. Basically, his goal was to create
a more perfect Union, and to insure “that the laws of the Union be faithfully executed in all the
states”.
3. When Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation, what was his motive?
His most important motive in issuing the Emancipation Proclamation was not to free the
slaves, but to save the Union. He did not want the South seceding and had tried to compromise
with them to keep them together. However, after all of his efforts failed, he enacted his only
remaining option.
The document claims that all persons held within “any State, or designated part of a
5. Why did the Emancipation Proclamation not free any slaves immediately?
Because it didn't give the government the power to free the slaves. It simply stated that
He used his influence to convince two thirds of the House of Representatives to vote for
7. Lincoln has often been referred to as the “Great Emancipator.” Which of his actions
primarily accounts for his holding that title? Explain your answer.
The Emancipation Proclamation sounds like it would be the answer, however, this
proclamation simply was an effort to mend the integrity of the Union before it collapsed. What
really earned him that title was his efforts in enacting the Thirteenth Amendment, which formally
Part C.
Individuals of religious and social standings played a large role in inciting the motivation
for abolition or generating support for the reform of the institution of slavery. Political leaders
attempted to use these moral conflicts as passageways to get votes, but eventually economic and