‫ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﻋﻠﻤﯽ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﯽ ﻃﻴﻒ‬

‫‪ 29‬آذر ‪89‬‬
 ‫ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺷﺒﮑﻪ ﻫﺎي ﻓﯿﺒﺮ ﻧﻮري‬
‫ و آﯾﻨﺪه آن در ﮐﺸﻮر‬FTTX

‫اﻣﯿﺮ ﺑﻬﮕﻮي‬

© 2010 KavoshCom. All rights reserved. KavoshCom Confidential 2

Agenda

§ Why FTTx?
§ FTTX Architectures
§ GPON and its components
§ GPON vs. PtoP Ethernet
§ Future of GPON
§ FTTX Global Market and GPON Vendors
§ FTTX Survey in Iran
§ FTTX Future in Iran

© 2010 KavoshCom. All rights reserved. KavoshCom Confidential 3

Why Fiber?

§ Higher bandwidth without distance or interference

constraints
§ Reliable, tested and proven technology
§ Endless applications
§ Same cost to install as traditional copper, but
§ 50% or more lower operational cost to run an all fiber
network
§ Safe, sound & future proof investment

© 2010 KavoshCom. All rights reserved. KavoshCom Confidential 4

 Why FTTH? - Trend of Broadband Access
Networks
2010.5
40/100GbE
100G
IEEE802.3 STD Next NG-PON2
target (WDM TDM Hybrid PON)
10GbE 2009.9
Data speed (bps)

10G P-P
10G-EPON
P-MP NG-PON1
GbE G-PON
1G
GE-PON
max.
(+ SCM-PON for video distribution)
B-PON
100M
100BaseT

min.
P-P: Point to Point
P-MP: Point to Multipoint
10M ADSL SCM: Subcarrier Modulation
NGA: Next Generation Access

Source: NTT Japan

1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 Year

© 2010 KavoshCom. All rights reserved. KavoshCom Confidential

5 5
Why FTTH? – Distance advantage

© 2010 KavoshCom. All rights reserved. KavoshCom Confidential 6

Why FTTH?– BW advantage
Web Surfing
Video Conferencing, Premises Surveillance
GPON is premium for ALL
services! SDTV VOD, Telecommuting
File Sharing, Home Video Sharing/Streaming
Real Time SDTV, Network PVR
VDSL2 can cover even
Multi-Player Gaming, Interactive Distance Learning
the HDTV service.
Premises Web Hosting
Telemedicine
ADSL2+ can cover the Large File Sharing
Triple-play service
HDTV VOD
bandwidth requirement.
Next Hosted Applications & Storage

FTTH (per sub)

VDSL2

ADSL2+

Cable Modem
Dial-up
Upstream 150 100 25 20 10 5 0 5 10 15 20 25 100 150 Downstream
Mbps
Source: Etisalat
© 2010 KavoshCom. All rights reserved. KavoshCom Confidential 7
FTTX Architectures

§ Point to Point Ethernet

Europe
§ Passive Optical Networks (PONs)
Broadband PON (BPON)
Based on ATM
Gigabit PON (GPON)
Based on Generic Framing Procedure (GFP)
Verizon, France Telecom, etc.
Ethernet PON (EPON)
Based on Ethernet
Japan

© 2010 KavoshCom. All rights reserved. KavoshCom Confidential 8

FTTX Architecture - PON Varieties

© 2010 KavoshCom. All rights reserved. KavoshCom Confidential 9

 GPON and its components
EDFA
(Erbium Doped
Fiber Amplifier)
Central Office Video
1550 nm
Voice & Data Voice/Data & Video
Downstream 1490nm/1310nm, 1550nm
1490 nm
OLT Optical
Couplers
ONT
(Optical (WDM) (Optical Network
Line Terminal)
Upstream
Terminal) 1310 nm 1x32
Optical Or
Cascade
Splitter

Bandwidths & Services

Upstream Downstream
1310 nm 1490 nm 1550 nm
Voice and Data Voice and Data Video
@ 155 to 622 Mbps @ 622 Mbps
42 MHz 550 MHz 860 MHz

Analog TV Digital TV HD/VOD

© 2010 KavoshCom. All rights reserved. KavoshCom Confidential 10

 GPON and its components (cont’d)

E1/DS1/
Downstream (single -fiber systems): 1490 nm Telephony
Upstream: 1310 nm
RF video (if present) 1555 nm
ONT1 Data

Access
Node TDM VOIP

E1/DS1
ONT2 E1/T1/
Telephony
NB Video

GbE
(and/or) CC OLT 1:32 Optical splitter
(or 1:64 for shorter reaches or
STMn/OCn BB TDMA
with Reach Extender)

POTS
TDM Time Division Multiplex
TDMA Time Division Multiple Access
CC Cross Connect
NB Narrow Band ONT32 Data
BB Broadband Up to 60 km physical reach
OLT Optical Line Termination
ONT Optical Network Termination

© 2010 KavoshCom. All rights reserved. KavoshCom Confidential 11

GPON vs. PtoP Ethernet
GPON PtoP
Bandwidth Shared Dedicated
Cost per subscriber Low High (more fiber and POPs)
Central Office Less Ports, Little add’l More Ports, More space and
space/power power
Fiber Troubleshooting More Difficult (if behind Easier
splitter)
Interoperability Challenge (b/w OLT and Not an issue
ONU)
Encryption Mgmt Req’d (overhead) Not Req’d
Expansion to New Users Easily configurable Requires more work

§ Total Cost difference dependent on:

Cost of laying fiber
Density of deployment area
Bandwidth required per customer
© 2010 KavoshCom. All rights reserved. KavoshCom Confidential 12
 GPON vs. PtoP Ethernet - TCO advantage
Realistic deployment Point-to-point Ethernet GPON
• 5000 subscribers connected to
CO
• PON splitting ratio 1:32
• Fiber terminations per ODF
rack: 1,440
(10 shelves holding 144 fibers)
• Power consumption figures and
ports per cage based on real
product specs

19.6
5000

x 6.7
38
x 31.8
x 3.6

Ethernet GPON
10 2.9
157

Power CO Space Patch cords

[kW] [M2]

Source: Etisalat
© 2010 KavoshCom. All rights reserved. KavoshCom Confidential 13
Future of GPON

§ 10Gbps GPON
Not yet commercialized
Demonstrated by Ericsson
Still shared bandwidth

§ WDM-PON
Pilot deployed by Korea Telecom for businesses only
Dedicated wavelengths per customer (no BW sharing)
Could deliver speeds in excess of 1 Gbit/s to individual homes
Expensive – 2-3 times the cost of GPON.
No wavelength-specific ONTs.

© 2010 KavoshCom. All rights reserved. KavoshCom Confidential 14

Countries with highest FTTH/FTTB+LAN
penetration

Source: FTTH Council

Approx. 56 Million Subscribers Worldwide

© 2010 KavoshCom. All rights reserved. KavoshCom Confidential 15
World’s top 10 FTTx operators in terms of
subscribers as of June 2009

Rank Operator Country Main technology & architecture FTTx subscribers

1 NTT Japan FTTH/B GEPON 11 793 000

2 China Telecom (1) China FTTH - FTTx+LAN EPON LAN/DSL 11 160 000
3 KT South Korea FTTB EPON/GEPON 3 555 644
4 Verizon USA FTTH BPON/GPON 3 100 000
5 SK Broadband South Korea FTTB/LAN GEPON 2 733 141
6 AT&T USA FTTN VDSL2 1 585 000
7 LG Powercom South Korea FTTH/B EPON/GEPON 1 504 090
8 Chunghwa Telecom Taiwan FTTB GEPON 1 342 000
9 KDDI Japan FTTH/B EPON/GEPON 1 211 000
10 Beeline Russia FTTB EP2P 724 000

Source: IDATE for FTTH Council Europe

© 2010 KavoshCom. All rights reserved. KavoshCom Confidential 16

Major GPON Vendors - OLT
Vendor Product Line
Adtran Total Access 5000
Alcatel-Lucent 7342 P-OLT
Alphion AOLT-4000
Calix F5 GPON OLT, C7 GPON
OLT
ECI Telecom Hi-FOCuS MSAN
Enablence (Wave 7) Trident 7 OLT Huawei SmartAX MA5600T

Ericsson EDA 1500

Huawei SmartAX MA5600T
Hitachi Telecom AMN1220
Huawei SmartAX MA5603T
LS Cable LST 9616 IMBA Series
Motorola AXS2200
NEC AM3100 Series MSAN
Occam 6322
Pannaway MAGNM-20 ZTE ZXA10 C220
ZTE ZXA10 C300
Tellabs 1150 MSAP
Zhone MALC OLT
ZTE ZXA10 C300 220

© 2010 KavoshCom. All rights reserved. KavoshCom Confidential

Source: Light Reading Magazine 17
Major GPON Vendors - ONT
RF POTS Gigabit
Vendor Product Line SFUs MDUs IPTV
Video Ports Ethernet
Adtran Total Access 300 x x x 2 x
Alcatel-Lucent 7342 ONT x x x x 4 x
Cambridge G- and T-series x x x x 24 x
Industries Group Main FTTX Services
Calix 710/710G, 720/720G, 740/740G, and x x x x 8 x
760/760G
Survey conducted in
Iran to identify
ECI Telecom B-FOCuS ONT x x x 2 x
services of interest
Enablence G-1000i, G-1300i, G-221, and G-888 x x x x 8 x (next slide)
(Wave7)

Ericsson EDA 1500 x x x x 2 x

Hitachi Telecom AMN1220 x x x x 6 x

Huawei EchoLife HG850 x x x 2 x

LS Cable LST Series x x x x 2 or 4 x

Motorola 1000GT2, 1500GT, and 6000GVT x x x x 2 x

NEC ME200 Series ONT x x x x 2 x

Huawei HG850
Nokia Siemens SURPASS hiX 570x* x x x x 2 x

Occam 2440 x x x x 2 x
Pannaway RGN x x x 4 x
Tellabs 1600-70X x x x 2 x Source: Light Reading
TXP 7200, 7300, and 7500 x x x 4 x Magazine

Zhone zNID x x x 2 x
ZTE ZXA10 x x x 2 x
© 2010 KavoshCom. All rights reserved. KavoshCom Confidential 18
FTTX Survey in Iran

§ Conducted by KavoshCom Group

§ Surveyed Residential, Commercial, Bank, and Educational users in
Tehran and other provinces
§ Goal was to learn about interested features and price value
indications

© 2010 KavoshCom. All rights reserved. KavoshCom Confidential 19

FTTX Study in Iran – Participants’ Profile

© 2010 KavoshCom. All rights reserved. KavoshCom Confidential 20

 ‫‪FTTX Study in Iran – Results‬‬
‫ﻣﺼﺎﺭﻑ ﺧﺎﻧﮕﯽ‬
‫)‪ : 0‬ﻋﻼﻗﻪ ﺍﯼ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻡ‪ : 5 ،‬ﺣﺘﻤﺎ" ﻧیﺎﺯ ﺩﺍﺭﻡ(‬

‫ﺍﻣﮑﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﺯﯼ ﺑﺎ ﮐیﻔیﺖ ﺑﺎﻻ‬

‫ﺍﻣﮑﺎﻥ ﻣﺸﺎﻫﺪﻩ ﻣﻨﺰﻝ ﺍﺭ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺩﻭﺭ‬
‫ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺗﻠﻔﻨﯽ ﺑﺎ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﻭ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﮐﺸﻮﺭ‬ ‫§ ﺍﺣﺴﺎﺱ ﻧیﺎﺯ ﺑﻪ‬
‫ﺍﻣﮑﺎﻥ ﺧﺮیﺪ ﺍیﻨﺘﺮﻧﺘﯽ‬
‫ﺳﺮﻋﺘﻬﺎﯼ ﺑﺎﻻﺗﺮ‬
‫ﺩﺭیﺎﻓﺖ ﺗﺼﺎﻭیﺮ ﺗﻠﻮیﺰیﻮﻧﯽ ﻭ ﻓیﻠﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺩیﺠیﺘﺎﻝ‬
‫ﺗﻤﺎﺷﺎﯼ ﻭیﺪﺋﻮﻫﺎﯼ ﺍیﻨﺘﺮﻧﺘﯽ ﺑﺼﻮﺭﺕ ﺁﻧﻼیﻦ ﺑﺎ ﮐیﻔیﺖ ﺑﺎﻻ ﻭ…‬
‫ﺍیﻨﺘﺮﻧﺖ ﭘﺮ ﺳﺮﻋﺖ‬

‫‪0‬‬ ‫‪0.5‬‬ ‫‪1‬‬ ‫‪1.5‬‬ ‫‪2‬‬ ‫‪2.5‬‬ ‫‪3‬‬ ‫‪3.5‬‬ ‫‪4‬‬ ‫‪4.5‬‬ ‫‪5‬‬

‫ﻣﺼﺎﺭﻑ ﺷﺮﮐﺘﯽ‬
‫)‪ : 0‬ﻋﻼﻗﻪ ﺍﯼ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻡ‪ : 5 ،‬ﺣﺘﻤﺎ" ﻧیﺎﺯ ﺩﺍﺭﻡ(‬
‫§ ﻧیﺎﺯ ﺑﻪ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﺳﺎﺯﯼ ﻭ‬
‫ﻣﺸﺎﻫﺪﻩ ﻣﺤﻞ ﮐﺎﺭ ﻭ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕ ﺑﺮ ﺩﻓﺎﺗﺮ ﺩیﮕﺮ ﺷﺮﮐﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺩﻭﺭ‬
‫ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺵ ﺑﺮﺍﯼ ﻣﺼﺎﺭﻑ‬
‫ﻭیﺪﺋﻮ ﮐﻨﻔﺮﺍﻧﺲ ﺑﺎ ﮐیﻔیﺖ ‪HD‬‬
‫ﺳﻮﺩﻣﻨﺪ ﺩیﮕﺮ‬
‫ﺍﻣﮑﺎﻥ ﺧﺮیﺪ ﺍیﻨﺘﺮﻧﺘﯽ‬

‫ﺍﻣﮑﺎﻥ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﻓﺎیﻞ ﺑﺎ ﺣﺠﻤﻬﺎﯼ ﺑﺎﻻ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﮐﻢ‬

‫ﺍیﻨﺘﺮﻧﺖ ﭘﺮ ﺳﺮﻋﺖ‬

‫‪0‬‬ ‫‪0.5‬‬ ‫‪1‬‬ ‫‪1.5‬‬ ‫‪2‬‬ ‫‪2.5‬‬ ‫‪3‬‬ ‫‪3.5‬‬ ‫‪4‬‬ ‫‪4.5‬‬ ‫‪5‬‬
‫‪© 2010 KavoshCom. All rights reserved.‬‬ ‫‪KavoshCom Confidential‬‬ ‫‪21‬‬
 ‫)‪FTTX Study in Iran – Results (cont’d‬‬
‫ﻣﺼﺎﺭﻑ ﺑﺎﻧﮑﯽ‬
‫)‪ : 0‬ﻋﻼﻗﻪ ﺍﯼ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻡ‪ : 5 ،‬ﺣﺘﻤﺎ" ﻧیﺎﺯ ﺩﺍﺭﻡ(‬

‫ﻭیﺪﺋﻮ ﮐﻨﻔﺮﺍﻧﺲ ﺑﺎ ﮐیﻔیﺖ ‪HD‬‬

‫ﺍیﺠﺎﺩ ﺳیﺴﺘﻢ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﯽ یﺎ ﺍیﻨﺘﺮﺍﻧﺖ ﭘﺮ ﺳﺮﻋﺖ ﻣیﺎﻥ ﺷﻌﺐ ﺑﺎﻧﮏ ﻭ…‬

‫ﺳیﺴﺘﻢ ﺗﻠﻔﻦ ﻣﺒﺘﻨﯽ ﺑﺮ ﺍیﻨﺘﺮﻧﺖ ) )‪VoIP‬ﺟﻬﺖ ﮐﺎﻫﺶ ﻫﺰیﻨﻪ ﻫﺎﯼ ﺗﻠﻔﻦ…‬

‫ﭼﮏ ﮐﺮﺩﻥ ﻭیﺪﺋﻮیﯽ ﻭ ﻣﺎﻧیﺘﻮﺭیﻨﮓ ﺯﻧﺪﻩ ﺍﻣﻨیﺘﯽ ﺷﻌﺐ ﺍﺯ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺩﻭﺭ‬

‫ﺍیﻨﺘﺮﻧﺖ ﭘﺮ ﺳﺮﻋﺖ‬

‫‪0‬‬ ‫‪0.5‬‬ ‫‪1‬‬ ‫‪1.5‬‬ ‫‪2‬‬ ‫‪2.5‬‬ ‫‪3‬‬ ‫‪3.5‬‬ ‫‪4‬‬ ‫‪4.5‬‬ ‫‪5‬‬

‫ﻣﺼﺎﺭﻑ ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺷﯽ‬
‫)‪ : 0‬ﻋﻼﻗﻪ ﺍﯼ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻡ‪ : 5 ،‬ﺣﺘﻤﺎ" ﻧیﺎﺯ ﺩﺍﺭﻡ(‬

‫ﻭیﺪﺋﻮ ﮐﻨﻔﺮﺍﻧﺲ ﺑﺎ ﮐیﻔیﺖ ‪HD‬‬

‫ﺩﺳﺘﺮﺳﯽ ﺳﺮیﻊ ﺑﻪ ﻓﺎیﻠﻬﺎﯼ ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺷﯽ ﻭ ﺍﻣﮑﺎﻥ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﻓﺎیﻞ ﺑﺎ ﺣﺠﻤﻬﺎﯼ ﺑﺎﻻ ﺩﺭ…‬

‫ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺵ ﺍﺯ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺩﻭﺭ ﻭ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﻭیﺪﺋﻮیﯽ ﮐﻼﺳﻬﺎﯼ ﺩﺭﺱ‬

‫ﺍیﻨﺘﺮﻧﺖ ﭘﺮ ﺳﺮﻋﺖ‬

‫‪0‬‬ ‫‪0.5‬‬ ‫‪1‬‬ ‫‪1.5‬‬ ‫‪2‬‬ ‫‪2.5‬‬ ‫‪3‬‬ ‫‪3.5‬‬ ‫‪4‬‬ ‫‪4.5‬‬ ‫‪5‬‬

‫‪© 2010 KavoshCom. All rights reserved.‬‬ ‫‪KavoshCom Confidential‬‬ ‫‪22‬‬

FTTX Study in Iran – Results (cont’d)

‫ >( ﺍﺯ ﺩیﺪ ﮐﺎﺭﺑﺮﺍﻥ‬2Mbps) FTTX ‫§ ﺍﺭﺯﺵ ﺍیﻨﺘﺮﻧﺖ ﭘﺮﺳﺮﻋﺖ‬

(‫ﺍﺭﺯﺵ )ﻣﺎﻫیﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ‬ ‫ﻧﻮﻉ ﮐﺎﺭﺑﺮ‬

35،000 ‫ﺧﺎﻧﮕﯽ‬
420،000 ‫ﺷﺮﮐﺘﯽ‬
1،000،000 ‫ﺑﺎﻧﮑﯽ‬
170،000 ‫ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺷﯽ‬

© 2010 KavoshCom. All rights reserved. KavoshCom Confidential 23

Future of FTTX in Iran

§ Good infrastructure (85,000 Km long fiber optic network throughout

the country)
§ GPON is the best choice
Cost advantage due to existing infrastructure/Re-use of ADSL POPs
Lower BW requirements
§ Pilot site in a Tehran neighborhood (ready in 5-6 months)
§ Who is responsible?
§4th Operator
§Infrastructure owners: TCI, Municipalities, …
§Content Owners: , IRIB
§Technical leads: Private parties
§or combination of ALL…
§ Success lies in co-operation of all parties
© 2010 KavoshCom. All rights reserved. KavoshCom Confidential 24
© 2010 KavoshCom. All rights reserved. KavoshCom Confidential 25