Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
1.
2.
3.
4.
4.1
4.2
4.3
5. Regenerative repeater
1.
Sec. 5.1, 5.2, pp. 309-317, Haykin
0 .25 .5 .75
Signal #2
1
1
0
t
-1
.25 .5 .75 1
s3 (t )
s2 (t )
t
0
T
3
s4 (t )
1
t
t
0
2T
3
T
3
t
0
FIGUR
6-2
E P5.4
FIGURE P5.5
1-8(Prob. 5.8, p. 339, Haykin)
(a) A pair of signals si(t) and sk(t) have a common duration T. Show that the inner
product of this pair of signals is given by
s (t )s (t )dt = s
T
T
i
sk
where si and sk are the vector representation of si(t) and sk(t), respectively.
(b) As a followup to part (a), show that
(s (t ) s (t )) dt = || s
T
s k || 2
Consider a pair of complex-valued signals s1(t) and s2(t) that are respectively
6-3
represented by
s1(t) = a111(t) + a122(t),
s2(t) = a211(t) + a222(t),
t
t
where the basis functions 1(t) and 2(t) are both real valued, but the coefficients a11,
a12, a21, a22 are complex valued. Prove the complex form of the Schwarz inequality:
s1 (t )s (t )dt
*
2
s1 (t ) dt s 2 (t ) dt
where the asterisk denotes complex conjugation. When is this relation satisfied with
the equality sign?
2.
x(t)
E x x (t ) x * (t )dt
(2-1)
x(t) h(t)
R xh x (t )h * (t )dt = x (t + )h * (t )dt
(2-2)
R x R xx ( ) = x (t ) x * (t )dt = x (t + ) x * (t )dt
(2-3)
E x x 2 (t )dt
(2-4)
R xh x (t )h (t )dt = x (t + )h (t )dt
R x R xx ( ) = x (t ) x (t )dt = x (t + ) x (t )dt
(2-5)
(2-6)
x(t)(matched filter)
2-1(Prob. 2.67, p. 170, Oppenheim & Willsky, Signals & Systems, 2nd ed.,
1997)
6-4
: y (t ) = x ( )h (t )d
y (T ) = x ( )h (T )d x 2 (t )dt
T
= x 2 (t )dt
0
1/ 2
T h 2 (t )dt
0
1/ 2
1/ 2
T x 2 (t )dt
0
h 2 (T t )dt
T
= M 1 / 2 x 2 (t )dt
0
T
y (T ) = M 1 / 2 x 2 (t )dt
0
T
y (T ) = a 2 x 2 (t )dt
0
1/ 2
1/ 2
(Schwarz Inequality)
1/ 2
1/ 2
1/ 2
h(t)=ax(T-t)
= a x 2 (t )dt a =
0
x 2 (t )dt
x0 (t )
1 x1 (t ) x0 (t ) x1 (t )
x0 (t )x1 (t )
(b) Lo x0 (t ) L1 x1 (t )
(i) Lo x0 (t ) x1 (t ) L1 x0 (t ) x1 (t )
6-5
: x0 * L0 t =4 = 4 , x0 * L1 t =4 = 2 , x1 * L0 t =4 = 2 , x1 * L1 t =4 = 4
x0 (t ) :
(c)
6-6
: R p ( ) = p (t + ) p (t )dt p 2 (t )dt
p 2 (t )dt
1/ 2
p 2 (t + )dt
1/ 2
R p ( ) R p (0)
R p (0) = max R p ( )
R xp ( ) = p (t + t0 ) p (t )dt = R p ( t0 )
p(t)
C = 3 108 m / sec ,
Rxp ( )
6-7
10 sec
2 distance = 3 108 m / sec 10 10 6 sec = 3 10 3 m
distance = 1500 meter
(iii) p(t)
(sharply peaked)
?
p2 (t ) sharp peak !
2-2(Prob. 2.66, p. 169, Oppenheim & Willsky, Signals & Systems, 2nd ed.,
1997) LTI Walsh functions
6-8
6-9
g k (t k ) h(t) LTI
k =0
t
2
g (t ) = h (t ) =
T
t T
g o (t ) = kA2T
T
t=T Fig. 4.3, p. 253, Haykin integrate-and-dump
t=T RC
S/N
2-1(Prob. 4.4, p. 301, Haykin)
If the ideal integrator is replaced by the simple resistance-capacitance (RC) low-pass
filter, determine the output SNR as a function of the time constant RC.
Determine the value of RC that maximizes the output SNR. The frequency
response of this filter is
1
1
H( f ) =
where f 0 =
f
2RC
1+ j
f0
The requirement is to optimize the selection of the 3-dB cutoff frequency f 0 of the
filter so that the peak pulse signal-to-noise ratio at the filter output is maximized. With
this objective in mind, show that the optimum value of f 0 is 0.2/T, for which the
loss in signal-to-noise ratio compared to the matched filter is about 1 dB.
3.1-2-2 (Prob. 7.17, p. 459, Proakis)
2-2(Prob. 7.31, p. 463, Proakis)
In the case when n is a power of 2, an n n Hadamard matrix is constructed by
means of the recursion
1 1
H2 =
1 1
H n
H 2n =
H n
6-10
Hn
H n
(a) Let Ci denote the ith row of an n n Hadamard matrix as defined above. Show
that the waveforms constructed as
n
i = 1, 2, K, n
are orthogonal, where p(t) is an arbitrary pulse confined to the time interval
0 t Tc .
(b) Show that the matched filters (or crosscorrelators) for the n waveforms {si(t)} can
be realized by a single filter (or correlator) matched to the pulse p(t) followed by a
set of n crosscorrelators using the code words {Ci}.
2-3(D-6-4)
For the pairs of binary signaling waveforms sketched below, determine whether
they are antipodal, orthogonal, and determine the matched filter for each.
(a)
-1
-1
T
0
"0"
(b)
"1"
"0"
"1"
(c)
T
0
"0"
"1"
0
T t
0
"0"
T t
"1"
3.
Eq. (5.89), p. 334, Haykin
Eq.(7.6-10),p.406, Proakis Appendix C, Carlson s1 s 2
AWGN
6-11
Dis tan ce
2 N o = Q
2 N o
p[error ] = Q s1 s 0
No 0
"0"
{
= E { R( , t )[s (t ) s (t )]dt }
= E { [s (t ) + N ( , t )][s (t ) s (t )]dt }
= s (t )[s (t ) s (t )]dt + E { N ( , t )[s (t ) s (t )]dt }
144424443 14444244443
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
0 (QE {N ( , t )}= 0 )
= s0 (t ), s1 (t ) s0 (t )
= E1E0 E0
2
TB
6-12
TB
TB
1 = E
TB
TB
TB
TB
E 02
TB
3 =
TB
TB
TB
N0
( )s0 ( )s0 ( )dd
2
TB
N0
2
N0
E0
2
TB
s02 ( )d
2 = 2 E0
TB
EN
EN
2
TB
TB
TB TB
4 = E s0 ( ) + N ( , )[s0 ( ) + N ( , )]s1 ( )s1 ( )dd
0 0
= 2 E1E0 +
N0
E0
2
6-13
EE
N
5 = E
0
TB
= E 0 E 0 E1
= s02 ( )d s0 ( )s1 ( )d +
TB
TB
TB
= E0 E1E0 +
TB
N0
E1E0
2
N0
E1E0
2
Var{ "0"} =
=
E1 N 0 E0 N 0
N
+
2 0 E1E0
2
2
2
N0
E0 + E1 2 E1E0
2
"1"
E { "1"} = E1 E1E0
Var { "1"} =
N0
E0 + E1 2 E1E0
2
(PDF)
T
6-14
T=
=
E{ "1"} + E{ "0"}
2
( p["0"]=p["1"])
E1 E0
2
p[error "0"] = E1 E0 e
1 x E { "0"}
2 Var { "0"}
dx
2 var{ "0"}
E1 E0
E1E0 E0
= Q
2
= Q
N0
E0 + E1 2 E1E0
)
)
= Q
E0 + E1 2 E1E0
2
N0
E0 + E1 2 E1E0
2
s1 (t ) s0 (t )
E 0 + E1 2 E1 E 0
=
Q
2N0
2N0
p[error"1"]=p[error"0"]
s (t ) s0 (t )
p[error ] = Q 1
2N 0
s1 (t ) s0 (t ) s1 (t ) s0 (t ) 3
(i) Sketch the response for all time of the filters matched to signal #2 and #3 designed
for a 1 second sampling time when signal #1 is used as input.
(j) Design matched filters with a one-second sampling time for signals which are
orthogonal and antipodal to signal #1 determined in Part (f). Sketch their
output for all time when signal #1 is used as the input. How do your sketches
compare at the sampling time to your results in Part (i)? Why?
(k) Determine the bit error probability if the signals are #1 and #2.
(l) Determine the bit error probability if the signals are #1 and #3.
(m) Determine the bit error probability if the signals are #2 and #3.
(n) Determine the bit error probability if the signals are #1 and its orthogonal signal.
(o) Determine the bit error probability if the signals are #1 and its antipodal signal.
#1 S1 (t )
#2
#3
S 2 (t )
S 3 (t )
2
1
1.58
1
1
0.5
0 0.5
-1.58
0.5
-2
message
6-16
(a)
1
2
(b) s (t ) = s 2 (t )dt
0
12
s1 (t )
12
1
= 4dt + 1dt
0
12
s2 (t )
12
1
2
2
= (1.58) dt + (1.58) dt
0
12
= 2.5
12
= 2.5
s3 (t ) = s1 (t ) = 2.5
(c) si (t ) s j (t ) = si (t ) + si (t ) 2 si (t ), s j (t )
2
12
12
6-17
12
s2 (t ), s3 (t ) = 1.58 ( 2)dt +
12
12
(d)cross-correlation
Rij = si (t ), s j (t )
R13 = 1.5
R23 = 3( 1.58 2) = 2.37
Correlation coefficient
ij =
Rij
Ei E j
(e) s2 (t ) s3 (t ) s2 (t ) s3 (t )
(f)Antipodal ("opposite")
6-18
()
2. matched filter
(a) h(t)
0.75 sec1.0 sec 1.5sec
(b) (a)matching signal
(c) #1 #2 #3
TS = 1 sec
(d) (f)antipodal(orthogonal
TS = 1 sec#1 (c)
(a)run backwards
in time h(t ) = s(TS t )
(a)
6-19
(b)
TS = 1 sec
TS = 0.75 sec 1.5 sec TS = 1 sec
0.25 sec 0.5sec
6-20
(c)
6-21
TS = 1 #2 #3
2.5 -1.5
Antipodal:
s1 (t ), santip (t ) = E = s1 (t ), santip (t )dt = s1 (t )s1 (t )dt
1
s s
p[error ] = Q 1 0
2N
0
= Q dis tan t
2N
0
= s0 s1 = [E1 + E0 2 s0 , s1
6-22
12
E0 = E1 = 2.5
inner product
(a)
)]
12
1.849
p[error ] = Q
= Q(0.9245) 1 0.8238 0.18
4
(b)
12
= 3.12
(d)
s1 , sorthog = 0
s1 sorthog = 5
s1 , santip = E = 2.5
s1 santip = 10
6-23
4.
multidimensional signal
AWGNAdditive White Gaussian Noise
performanceerror probability
SNR
4.1
orthogonal
antipodal signalOn-off
4.1-1Orthogonal Signals
1 01 s 0 (t )
s1 (t ) R bpsbits per second
Tb = 1 / R
0 s 0 (t ) = 1 0 t Tb
1 s 1 ( t ) = 1
(1)
0t<
Tb
2
Tb
< t Tb
2
T
t = b
2
s0 s1
6-24
(2)
Tb
s0 (t ) s1 (t )dt = 0
(3)
r (t ) = si (t ) + n(t )
i = 0,1
0 t Tb
(4)
r (t ) 0 t Tb 01
optimum
receiversignal correlator
matched filter detector 2
s0 (t )
r (t ) = s0 + n(t )
0 t Tb
2 r0 r1 t = Tb
Tb
Tb
Tb
(6)
= + n0
S 0 (t )
S1 (t )
A
t
Tb
2
Tb
Tb
-A
()d
S0 (t )
Detector
S1(t )
r1
Output
data
()d
0
Sample
at t=Tb
Tb
Tb
Tb
(7)
n0 n1 correlator
Tb
n0 = n(t ) s0 (t )dt
(8)
6-25
Tb
n1 = n(t ) s1 (t )dt
(9)
E = A 2Tb s 0 (t ) s1 (t ) s1 (t )
0 t Tb
r (t ) = s1 + n(t )
r0 = n0
(10)
(11)
r1 = E + n1
n(t )
N0
Zero mean
Tb
(12)
E (n1 ) = 0
(13)
variance i2
i2 = E (ni2 ) =
Tb
Tb
N 0 Tb
si (t ) si ( ) (t )dtd
2 0
N Tb
= 0 si2 (t )dt
2 0
N 0
=
i = 0, 1
2
(14)
(15)
s0 (t )
P (r0 | s0 (t )) =
2
2
1
e ( r0 ) / 2
2
(16)
P(r1 | s0 (t )) =
2
2
1
e r1 / 2
2
(17)
3 s0 (t ) p(ro | 0) p (r1 | 0)
6-26
s0 (t ) r1 > r0
Pe = P(r1 > r0 ) = P(n1 > + n0 ) = P(n1 n0 > )
n1 n2 Zero-mean Gaussian random variable x
x = n1 n0 Zero-mean Gaussian x
(18)
E (n1n0 ) = 0
E ( x 2 ) = 2(
(19)
N 0
) = N 0 = x2
2
(20)
Pe =
1
2 x
e x
/ 2 x2
= erfc E
dx = Q
2N
0
N0 2
(21)
(impulse response)
0 t Tb
(22)
h(t ) = s(Tb t )
y(t)(convolution integral) s(t)
t
y (t ) = s ( )h(t )d
(23)
y (t ) = s ( )h(Tb t + )d
(24)
y(t) t = Tb
Tb
y (Tb ) = s 2 ( )d = E
(25)
E s(t) t= Tb
4
Monte Carlo Pe SNR
(0,1)(0,0.5)
(binary source output) 0 1 0 r0 = E + n0
r1 = n1 1 r0 = n0 r1 = E + n1 n0 n1
zero-mean 2 = EN 0 / 2
E 1(Signal-to-Noise Ratio, SNR) E / N 0
1/2 2 N=10000 SNR
10 N=10000
6-27
Pe = 10 3 5 (21)
Monte Carlo
5
4.1-1-1 1 AWGN
10 / Tb s0 (t ) 10
(A,A,,A) s1 (t ) (A,A,A,A,A,-A,-A,-A,-A,-A) s0 (t )
rk = A + nk
k = 1,2,L,10
s1 (t )
A + nk
rk =
A + n k
1 k 5
6 k 10
6-28
{nk } zero-mean 2
MATLAB {nk } 2 = 0 2 = 0.1
2 = 1.0 2 = 2.0
4.1-1-2 1 6
S0 (t )
S1 (t )
A
Tb
Tb
2
-A
Tb
s0 (t ) s1 (t )
4.1-1-3
4.1-1-4 (Prob.5.5, p. 338, Haykin)
An orhtogonal set of signals is characterized by the property that the inner product of
any pair of signals in the set is zero. The following figure shows a pair of signals s0(t)
and s1(t) that satisfy this condition.
1) Construct the signal constellation for s0(t) and s1(t).
s0(t)
s1(t)
A
Tb/2 Tb
0
Tb
-A
Further problems:
2) Determine the correlator outputs at the sampling instants.
3) Consider the use of matched filters for the demodulation of the signals shown,
determine the outputs.
4) Consider the detector for the signals shown, which are equally probable and
have equal energies. The optimum detector for these signals compares r0 and
r1 and decides a 0 was transmitted when r0 > r1 and that a 1 was transmitted
when r1 > r0. Determine the probability of error.
4.1-1-5 (Prob. 5.12, p. 340, Haykin)
6-29
Figure P5.12 shows a pair of signals s1(t) and s2(t) that are orthogonal to each
other over the observation interval 0 t 3T. The received signal is defined
by
x(t) = sk(t) + w(t), 0 t 3T
k = 1, 2
where w(t) is white Gaussian noise of zero mean and power spectral density N0/2.
1) Design a receiver that decides in favor of signals s1(t) or s2(t), assuming that
these two signals are equiprobable.
2) Calculate the average probability of symbol error incurred by this receiver for
E/N0 = 4, where E is the signal energy.
FIGURE P5.12
4.1-2 Antipodal Signals
(antipodal signal) s 0
s1 s 0 (t ) = s(t ) s1 (t ) = s(t ) 7
Sec. 4.3, pp. 253-258, Haykin AWGN
r (t ) = s(t ) + n(t )
0 t Tb
(26)
S0 (t )
S1 (t )
A
0
Tb
Tb
-A
S0 (t )
S1 (t )
A
0
Tb
2
Tb
0
-A
Tb Tb
2
6-30
7 antipodal signals
8 s0 (t )
r (t ) = s(t ) + n(t )
r = Tb
(27)
r =+n
(28)
Tb
n = n(t ) s (t )dt
(29)
Tb Tb
N 0 Tb Tb
s (t ) s ( ) (t )dtd
2 0 0
N Tb 2
= 0
s (t )dt
2 0
N 0
=
2
=
(30)
(31)
s(t ) r
2
2
1
e ( r ) / 2
2
s (t ) r
2
2
1
e ( r + ) / 2
2
6-31
(32)
(33)
9 0 1
equiprobable
1
0 1 P(0)=P(1)= 9
2
s(t ) r < 0
1
Peo = P ( r < 0 0 ) =
=
1
2
e ( r )
/ 2 2
e r
= Q = Q
/2
2
N0
dr
(34)
dr
1
= erfc
2
E
N0
= erfc E
2
N
0
(35)
10 antipodal signal
11
4.1-2-1
2 = 0 2 = 0.1 2 = 1.0 2 = 2.0
4.1-2-2(Prob. 7.17, p. 459, Proakis, 7.26)
s1 (t ) = s2 (t ) = T
0
0t T
otherwise
N0
W/Hz.
2
2) If the ideal integrator is replaced by the RC filter shown in the figure, determine
the output SNR as a function of the time constant RC.
3) Determine the value of RC that maximizes the output SNR.
r (t ) = si (t ) + n(t )
Output decision
t
() dt
0
Detector
t=kT
R
t = kT +
<< T
where +A and A occur with equal probability and the noise variable n is
characterized by the (Laplacian) p.d.f. shown in the following figure .
1 ) Determine the probability of error as a function of the parameters A and .
2 ) Determine the SNR required to achieve an error probability of 10 5 .
How dose the SNR compare with the result for a Gaussian p.d.f.?
p ( n) =
1
2
2 /
n
4.1-2-4(Prob. 5.13, pp. 339-340, Haykin , Prob. 7.24, p. 461, Proakis, 7.33)
A Manchester encoder maps an information 1 into 10 and a 0 into 01. If the output
of the encoder is transmitted by use of NRZ, the signal waveforms corresponding
to the Manchester code are shown in the following figure. Determine the
probability of error if the two signals are equally probable.
s1 (t )
s 2 (t )
T
t
-A
0
-A
6-34
4.1-3On-off
antipodal signal
on-off 0 I s(t)
n(t )
r (t ) =
s (t ) + n(t )
0 is transmitted
1 is transmitted
(36)
n(t ) AWGN
n
r (t ) =
+ n
(37)
0 is transmitted
1 is transmitted
P(r | 0) =
P(r | 1) =
2
2
1
e r / 2
2
(38)
0 is transmitted
2
2
1
e( r ) / 2
2
(39)
1 is transmitted
0 1 equiprobable 12
12 on-off
0
Pe 0 ( ) = P(r > ) =
1
2
e r
/ 2 2
dr
(40)
threshold 1
e ( r )
/ 2 2
dr
(41)
Pe ( ) =
1
1
Pe 0 ( ) + Pe1 ( )
2
2
(42)
6-35
2
(40)(41)(42)
opt =
Pe (
opt
) = Q
2N
(43)
On-off 10
Monte Carlo Pe SNR
(0,1)(0,0.5)
(binary source output) 0 1 0 1 (mapping) 0 E
n zero-mean
2 = EN 0 / 2 E 1SNR 1/2
E/2 r>l/2 1 r<l/2
0
N=10000 SNR 10
N=10000 Pe = 10 3
13(43) Monte
Carlo (24)(34)(43) 5 11 13
On-off antipodal signal 6dB 3dB
3dB
13
4.1-3-1
2 = 0 2 = 0.1 2 = 1.0 2 = 2.0
4.1-3-2(Prob. 4-21, p. 221, Couch)
6-36
Assume a typical binary sequence and show that if the corresponding polar NRZ
signal and unipolar NRZ signal have the same peak-to-peak amplitude, the polar
signal has less power (an advantage) than the unipolar signal. If noise is added to
these signals, how do the probabilities of error compare for these two signaling
techniques?
4.1-4
antipodal on-off
(signal space)
signal constellation diagram 14
antipodal on-off
( ,0) (0, )
(r0 , r1 )
(r0 , r1 ) = ( + n0 , n1 )
(r0 , r1 ) = (n0 , + n1 )
6-37
15 Monte Carlo
level
16
6-38
0t T
sm (t ) = Am g (t )
Am m g (t )
g (t ) =
(45)
0 t T
otherwise
1/T
0
(44)
4 { Am } = {3d , d , d ,3d }
Am = (2m 3)d
m = 0,1,2,3
(46)
Euclidean Distance 2d 4 16
pulse-amplitude-modulatedPAM
Fig. 4.20,
p. 276, Haykin IV 16
00 s0 (t )
01 s1 (t )
11 s2 (t )
10 s3 (t )
symbol
symbol interval
R = 1 / Tb symbol interval T = 2Tb PAM
17 PAM AWGN
0t T
(47)
r (t ) = si (t ) + n(t )
i = 0,1,2,3
correlatormatched filter
r = r (t ) g (t )dt
0
(48)
= Ai + n
17 4 PAM
n
2 = E (n 2 ) =
Tb
N0
2
N0
=
2
N0
=
2
=
Tb
Tb
Tb
Tb
(49)
g ( t ) g ( ) ( t ) dtd
(50)
g 2 ( t ) dt
r
6-39
2
2
1
e ( r Ai ) / 2
2
Ai 4
P(r | si (t )) =
(51)
Di = r Ai , i = 0,1,2,3 n > d
+ 3d 3d 4
symbol
P4 =
=
3
P ( r Am
4
3
2
d /
1
e
2
> d ) =
x
/2
dx
3
2
1
e
2
3
Q
/ 2
(51)
dx
=
3
Q
2d 2
N 0
E av =
1 4 T 2
1
s k (t )dt = d 2 (9 + 1 + 1 + 9) = 5d 2
0
4 k =1
4
(52)
3 2 Eav
Q
2 5 N 0
3 4 E avb
= Q
2 5N
0
(53)
6-40
19
4 M = 2 k
s m (t ) = Am g (t )
m = 0,1,2,L, M 1
(54)
0t T
2d
Am = (2m M + 1)d
m = 0,1,2, L, M 1
(55)
M PAM
PM =
2( M 1) 6(log 2 M ) avb
Q
( M 2 1) N
M
0
(56)
M=16 PAM
18 Monte Carlo Pe SNR N=10000
SNR 10 N=10000
Pe = 10 3 20
56 * Monte Carlo
6-41
21
4.2-1
2 = 0 2 = 0.1 2 = 1.0 2 = 2.0
4.2-2(Prob. 7.1, p. 453, Proakis, 7.1)
Determine the average energy of a set of M PAM signals of the form
s m (t ) = s m (t ),
where s m = E g Am ,
m = 1, 2,K, M
0t T
amplitudes that are symmetric about zero and are uniformly spaced with distance
d
0
d between adjacent amplitudes as shown in the above figure. The decision is made
in favor of the amplitude level that corresponds to the smallest distance.
Determine the probability of error for the optimum detector.
4.3 Multidimensional Signal Transmission
M = 2k
k = log 2 M 16
one-dimensional signal
M = 2k ab
s i (t ), i = 0,1,..., M 1
si (t ) sk (t )dt = E ik
i, k = 0,1,L, M 1
(57)
E ik Kronecker delta
ik
1
=
0
i = k
(58)
i k
22 4 (0, T )
6-42
E =
s i2 ( t ) dt =
A 2T
M
i = 0 ,1 , 2 , L , M 1
(59)
22 4
set M
s0 = ( E ,0,0,LL,0)
s1 = (0, E ,0,LL,0)
M
sM = (0,0,LL,0, E )
23 M = 2 M = 3
23 M=2 M=3
6-43
(61)
n(t ) si (t )dt = ni
T
i = 1,2,3,L, M 1
(62)
i2 = E ( ni2 ) =
N0
2
N0
=
2
=
Tb Tb
2
i
(63)
s (t )s ( ) (t )dtd
N
s (t )dt = 2
0
(64)
P ( r0 | s0 (t ) ) =
P ( ri | s0 (t ) ) =
1
2
1
2
e ( r0 E )
e ri / 2
/ 2 2
(65)
i = 1,2,L, M 1
(66)
s0 (t ) r0 > ri i = 1,2,L, M 1
(67)
6-44
(68)
(69)
(70)
r0
(71)
f ri ( ri )dri , i = 1,2,..., M 1
r
= 1 Q 0
2r 2
0
= 1 Q
N
(72)
symbol
(73)
r
= 1 1 Q 0
r
= 1 1 Q 0
y=
r0
( r0 E ) 2
2 2
PM =
1
= y
2
2E
N0
f r0
(74)
s0 ( r0 ) dr0
M 1
1
e
( r0 E ) 2
2 2 dr
0
(75)
{1 [1 Q( y )] }e
2
1
M 1
M 1
( y 2 E / N 0 ) 2 / 2
(76)
dy
M = 2 76
Eb
P2 = Q
N
0
(77)
76 symbol symbol
symbol
PM
P
= M
M 1 2k 1
(78)
M = 2 k , k k n
( ) k
k
n
symbol
k
k PM
2 k 1
=
k
PM
k
1
2k 1
n n 2
n =1
(79)
6-45
Pb =
2 k 1
PM
2k 1
(80)
01 s1 = (0, E ,0,0)
10 s 2 = (0,0, E ,0)
11 s3 = (0,0,0, E )
si
si E 1 E = 2 Eb
Eb = 1 / 2 N=10000 SNR
10 N=10000
Pe = 10 3 27(76) (77)(80)
* Monte Carlo
6-46
26
4.3-1
2 = 0.1 2 = 1.0 2 = 2.0
4.3-2 27
27
4.3-1: Bi-orthogonal signals
Bi-orthogonal signal
28 M=4
s 0 = ( E ,0,0, LL ,0)
s1 = (0, E ,0, LL ,0)
M
s M / 21 = (0,0, LL ,0, E )
s M / 2 = ( ,0,0, LL ,0)
M
s M 1 = (0,0, LL ,0, )
s i (t ) AWGN
0t T
r (t ) = si (t ) + n(t )
n(t ) N 0 / 2
r (t )
6-47
ri =
r(t )s (t )dt
i = 0,1, L ,
M
1
2
(81)
s 0 (t )
ri =
s (t )dt
i = 0,1, L ,
E + n0
=
ni
ni =
(82)
i=0
i0
n(t )s (t )dt
i = 0,1, L ,
M
1
2
M
1
2
(83)
2 = EN 0 / 2
| ri |
(84)
| r j |= max{| ri |}
i
28
M=4
r j > 0 s j (t ) r j < 0 s j (t ) s 0 (t )
Pc =
r0 / N 0 / 2
r0 / N 0 / 2
x2 / 2
dx
M 1
P (r0 )dr0
(85)
P(r0 ) =
e ( r )
/ 2 2
(86)
2
symbol
PM = 1 Pc
(87)
M=4 29 Monte
Carlo Pe SNR
(0,1)(0,0.25)(0.25,0.5)(0.5,0.75)
(0.75,1.0) 00011110
6-48
00 s0 = ( E ,0)
01 s1 = (0, E )
10 s 2 = (0, E )
11 s3 = ( E ,0)
s 2 = s1 s 3 = s 0
si
si E 1 E = 2 Eb
Eb = 1 / 2 N=10000 SNR
10 N=10000
Pe = 10 3 30(85) (86)(87)
* Monte Carlo
30
4.3-3(Prob. 7.27, p. 462, Proakis, 7.37)
2 (t )
s2
s1
N=2
1 (t )
s3
s4
2 (t )
s5
s3
s6
s4
N=3
s7
3 (t ) s
8
1 (t )
s2
s1
N0
. The message are
2
1 0 t T
s1 (t ) =
0 otherwise
1 0t 2
T
s 2 ( t ) = s3 ( t ) = 1
0T
2
0 otherwise
s1 (t ) = T
0
0t T
otherwise
At
A
s 2 (t ) =
T
0
0t T
otherwise
6-51
repeaters AWGN
(bit error rate) Pb Pb SNR E b N o
channel attenuation
2.6 s (t ) 0< <1
r (t ) = s (t ) + n(t )
Transmitted
signal
Received
signal
channel
s(t)
r ( t ) = s( t ) + n ( t )
Noise
n(t)
Attenuation
Figure 2.6 Mathematical model of channel with attenuation and additive noise.
SNR
2 Eb
No
repeaters
(regenerate)(noise-free) regenerative repeaters
Wireline filter-optic communication channels
Pb = Q(
2 Eb
No
K regenerative repeaters
Pb KQ(
Eb
No
K analog repeaters
6-52
(2.53)
Pb Q(
Eb
KN o
(2.54)
Eb
No
error of 10 5 if (a) analog repeaters are employed , and (b) regenerative repeaters are
employed. The number of repeaters used in the system is K=100. If regenerative
repeaters are used, the
Eb
No
10 5 = 100Q (
) 10 7 = Q(
2 Eb
No
which yields approximately 11.3 dB. If analog repeaters are used, the
from (2.53) is 10 5 = Q(
2 Eb
100 N o
) , which yields
Eb
No
Eb
No
obtained
the required SNR is about 18.3dB, or approximately 70 times the transmitter power of
the digital communication system.