Sunteți pe pagina 1din 1

TABLE 14.

Detection Evaluation Criteria Example for Process FMEA


Inspection Type

Detection Almost impossible Very remote Remote Very low Low Moderate

Criteria Absolute certainty of nondetection. Controls will probably not detect. Controls have poor chance of detection. Controls have poor chance of detection. Controls may detect. Controls may detect.

C X X X X

Suggestion Range of Detection Methods Cannot detect or is not checkeq. Control is achieved with indirect or random checks only. Control is achieved with visual inspection only. Control is achieved with double visual inspection only.' Control is achieved with charting methods, such as SPC (Statistical Process Control). Control is based on variable gauging after parts have left the station, or Go/No Go gauging performed on 100% of the parts after parts have left the station. . Error detection in subsequent operations, OR gauging . performed on setup and first-piece check (for setup causes only). Error detection in-station, or error detection in subsequent operations by multiple layers of acceptance: supply, select, install, verify. Cannot accept discrepant part. Error detection in-station (automatic gauging with automatic stop feature). Cannot pass discrepant part. Discrepant parts cannot be made because item has been error-proofed by process/product design.

Ranking 10 9 8

7
6 5

Moderately high

Controls have a good chance to detect. Controls have a good chance to detect.

x
x

High

x
x
X

Very high Very high

Controls almost certain to detect. Controls certain to detect.

2
1

Inspection Types: A. Error-proofed; B. Gauging; C. Manual Inspection. Source: Reprinted with permiSSion from the FMEA Manual (DaimlerChrysler, Ford Motor Company, General Motors Supplier Quality Requirements Task Force).

S-ar putea să vă placă și