Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
A transformational leadership is rich blend of four leadership traits, i.e. idealized influence, individualized consideration, intellectual stimulation and inspirational motivation. Various researchers have found relationship of these traits with commitment. Transformational leadership in its all behaviors is positively and significantly related to continuance commitment, normative commitment and affective commitment (Tseng and Kang 2008). Leadership and motivation are like brother and sister. It is difficult to think of a leader who does not motivate others. But leadership embraces more than motivation. (Donald H McGannon). Motivation is predicated upon the nuts and bolts of macro-theoretical framework proposed by socio-psychologists like Maslow and Herzberg. They took a psychological resource perspective in their approach to develop motivation theories. Their work stood in sharp contrast to the theory of Protestant Ethics and Capitalism by Max Weber. The assumptions that managers nourish about the concept of motivation are likely to affect how they are able to employ it to motivate and reward their employees in their respective sphere of activities. Daft distinguishes four perspectives on employee motivation. These are the traditional approach, human relations approach, human resource approach and the contemporary approach. Leaders who motivate their subordinates got satisfied results in term of performance. Motivation is a big tool to yield high performance from the employees. At middle level management the employees (Mid-level managers) really needs motivation from leaders, they took bold and positive decisions for the betterment of the organisation. Job satisfaction is a positive feeling an individual has towards his or her job, (Daft, 2003). An employee who is satisfied feels comfort and solaced in his organization setting, thus propelling him/her a desire for greater reward. The role of leader in developing a sense of satisfaction and security of job taps a great degree of latent talent out of the middle level management. Job satisfaction in tandem with conducive milieu begotten by leadership is a big tool to enhance the overall companys performance.
1993) and indirectly through its effects on subordinates satisfaction with their leader (Hater & Bass, 1988). A majority of leadership researches has been done on top and executive management and has embraced a narrow definition of leadership (Ayman, Chemers, & Fiedler, 1995). The researchers paid less heed to middle level management thats why I am focusing on middle level management. With the changing behavior of organizational structure, culture and politics with the onslaught of globalization in Pakistan, the overall organizational variables such as leadership styles, motivation factors and the relevant performance measurement tools to examine the performance of employees are in a constant state of flux. Employee performance depends on how the leader influences the subordinates and how it is related to the motivation under the highly changing organisational environment. Motivation factor from the upper side automatically leads towards the job satisfaction and ultimately the job satisfaction enhances the employee performance. Multiple researches have been conducted to understand the relationship between the leadership styles and employee performance. As the middle level management has the key role in organizational culture and politics, the flow of information in the organization and to keep the momentum of the organizational working environment so my proposition is to identify the practicing leadership styles in Pakistan and their impact on the job outcomes of middle level management. Job Satisfaction and Motivation needs are pivotal in the work place particularly in the twenty-first century as workers have become more cognizant of their rights, responsibilities, their judicio-legal access via mass education and media. According to Fredrick Hertzberg's Job Satisfaction model, there are factors within and outside an organisation that affects the extent to which employees of an organisation are satisfied. These include the structure of the organisation, the organisational culture and the internal politics that pertains in the organisation (Mullins, 2005). My proposition is to explore the hitherto latent impacts of leadership styles on performance of middle level management in the Pakistani business environment through socio-business lens. 1. To evaluate Leader -Employee relationship and its importance within an organisation. 2. To identify the problems associated with leader-employees relationship in the business environment. 3. To investigate what factors really motivate middle level managers in Pakistan.
3
4. To study causal connection between job satisfaction and job performance. 5. To have the clear understanding that the motivation, performance and the job satisfaction of middle level managers really affect the overall organisational performance in Pakistan.
Theoretical Framework
The anticipated model assumes that leadership styles consequence the organizational performance. The model indicates that the leadership styles directly reflected the employee performance through motivation and the change in attitude of employee towards job. Job satisfaction which leads the employee towards better performance can only be attained through the positive attitude towards job and the motivation from leaders. Organisational performance and the employee motivation are inter-dependant on each other and both variables have effect by the leadership styles. The following model explains the relationship between each variable those are involve in the process of the impact of leadership styles on the performance, motivation and job satisfaction of middle level managers.
Theoretical Model
motivation and its impact on employee attitude towards job is examined while keeping the middle level management in view. In third step leadership style and employee performance is discussed and similarly in fourth step the effect of employee performance on job satisfaction is being examined. In fifth step the impact of ultimate job satisfaction on overall organisational performance is being discussed.
People are prone to develop mosaic of leadership styles from the environment that they live in and the culture in which they get socialized. These styles are derivative of certain motivational urges affect humans in their thinking, actions and behaviour towards job in a complex way. There are three drivers that preponderate leadership styles. These impulses are achievementmotivation, affiliation-motivation and power-motivation. No single style is effective in all situations, but rather the situation determines the style that will most likely be effective (Fiedler, as cited Stoner et al 1997). Different leaders have different motivational methods. In the first method, achievement, goal setting and success are very important to these leaders. Affiliation motivation is a drive to relate people on a social basis. Leaders who are high on affiliation motivation work harder when they are complemented for their friendly attitude and co-operation with their team. Power motivation is a modus operandi that compels people to hold sway over other people, take control and charge and change situations. People who are high on power motivation are leaders by their innate endowments. They carry within themselves certain traits of charisma. These people are willing to take risks to achieve certain changes
attitude toward the company, monetary benefits, and attitude toward management. Job satisfaction has a positive impact on turnover. A wide range of internal and external factors affect an employees level of satisfaction. Employees who are satisfied with their jobs tend to be committed to the organization.
research. The increase in the research studies suggests that job satisfaction might be positively connected with performance outcomes (Cole, Larry E and Cole, Michael S). Job satisfaction according to Locke is a pleasurable or positive emotional state resulting from the appraisal of ones job or job experience ((Judge, Timothy A. And Saari, Lise M.). Over the years research has indicated that there are dispositional and cultural influences on job satisfaction. One of the most important areas of the work situation to influence job satisfaction- the work itself- is often overlooked by practioners when addressing job satisfaction (Judge, Timothy A. and Saari, Lise M.). Character and critical self-reflexivity are proportional to the job satisfaction. Self perception of job is another major cause. Satisfaction is directly proportional to performance, which, in turn, brings better working environment as a windfall. Working conditions matter in relation to job satisfaction and organizational impact. These are prerequisites for yielding a productive employee base and robust performance. Researchers began to take a critical look at the happy worker is a productive worker idea.
the hilt for the improvement, uplifting and upgrading of the organisation at local, national, regional and global levels.
Research Questions
The main question to conduct the research work is Does leadership styles impact on organisational performance through motivation of middle level management and employee individual performance which might results in job satisfaction?. 1. Does leadership style influence employees performance? 2. Do leadership styles affect the employee behavior towards job? 3. Does motivation and employee behavior towards job power the job satisfaction? 4. What leadership style could be adopted to improve middle level managers performance in Pakistan?
for collecting data from respondents by using convenient sampling technique due to time and cost constraints. The data will be collected via a questionnaires made up of multiple questions. The questions will contain quantitative measure of Psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, job satisfaction, job involvement and Turnover intention. This primary data will then be analyzed and interpreted.
Data Analysis
Descriptive statistics, for all variables, including means, standard deviations and variance will be used for sample descriptions. Inferential statistics will be used for correlation analysis to find inter-correlations among study variables and multiple linear regression analysis will be conducted to test the dependencies. Mediated multiple regression will be used in order to find out mediation of intrinsic motivation in between the relationship of psychological empowerment and job outcomes. SPSS software package will be used for analysis of the data collected.
References
Bass, Bernard M. (1985) Leadership and Performance beyond Expectations. The Free Press, New York Bycio, P., Hackett, R.D. and Allen, J.S. (1995) Further Assessment of Basss (1985) Conceptualization of Transformational and Transactional Leadership, Journal of Applied Psychology, 80(4): 468-78 Cole, Larry E and Cole, Michael S. Employee Satisfaction and Organizational Performance: A summary of Key Findings from Applied Psychology. Daft, R.L. (2003) Management (6th Ed.).Thomson Learning. Hater, J. J., & Bass, B. M. (1988). Superiors evaluations and subordinates perceptions of transformational and transactional leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 695-702. Judge, Timothy A. and Saari, Lise M. Employee Attitudes and Job Satisfaction. MULLINS, L. J. (2005) Management and Organisational Behaviour (7th Ed.) FT Prentice Hall.
10
Ostroff, C. (1992). The relationship between satisfaction, attitudes, and performance: An organizational Level Analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 963-974. Stogdill, R. M. (1963) Manual for the leader Behavior Description Questionnaire Form XII, Bureau of Business Research, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH Stogdill, R.M.& Coons, A.E. 1957. Leader behavior its description and measurement, Ohio Bureau of Business Research, The Ohio State University, 88, 1-27. Tseng H-C, Kang L-M, (2008) How Does Regulatory Focus Affect Organizational Commitment? Transformational Leadership as a Mediator, AIMS International Conference on Management.
11