THE HIDDEN FACTS OF NEHRU FAMILY

Subject: FW: HIDDEN STORY OF GANDHI FAMILY HISTORY ! ! !............ MUST READ

THIS WILL MAKE INTERESTING READING IN THE VETERANS COLUMNS

Let me first clarrify that i don't take any responsibility for the facts stated below. It's just a peice of information which should be taken in the spirit. Whether its historically right or wrong, god knows. Enjoy it while you read. Its very masala news. It has beendoing rounds of the forwards for quite some time now, but the elections make it even more interesting!

VERY INTERESTING HISTORY!

At the very beginning of his book, 'The Nehru Dynasty', Astrologer K.N. Rao mentions the names of Jawaharlal's father and grandfather. Jawaharlal's father was believed to be Motilal and Motilal's father was one Gangadhar Nehru. We all know that Jawaharlal's only daughter was Indira Priyadarshini Nehru; Kamala Nehru was her mother, who died in Switzerland of tuberculosis. She was totally against Indira's proposed marriage with Feroze. Why? No one tells us that! Now, who is this Feroze? We are told by many that he was the son of the family grocer. The grocer supplied wines, etc.. to Anand Bhavan (previously known as Ishrat Manzil) What was the family grocer's name?

One frequently hears that Rajiv Gandhi's grandfather was Pandit Nehru. But then we all know that everyone has two grandfathers, the paternal and the maternal grandfathers.

In fact, the paternal grandfather is deemed to be the more important grandfather in most societies. Why is it then, nowhere, we find Rajiv Gandhi's paternal grandfather' s name? It appears that the reason is simple. Rajiv Gandhi's paternal grandfather was a Muslim gentleman from the Junagadh area of Gujarat. This Muslim grocer by the name of Nawab Khan, had married a Parsi woman after converting her to Islam. This is the source where from the myth of Rajiv being a Parsi was derived. Rajiv's father Feroze, was Feroze Khan before he married Indira, against Kamala Nehru's wishes. Feroze's mother's family name was Ghandy, often associated with Parsis and this was changed to Gandhi, sometime before his wedding with Indira, by an affidavit. The fact of the matter is that (and this fact can be found in many writings) Indira was very lonely. Chased out of the Shantiniketan University by Guru Dev Rabindranath himself for misdemeanour, the lonely girl was all by herself, while father Jawaharlal was busy with politics, pretty women and illicit sex, the mother was in hospital. Feroze Khan, the grocer's son was then in England and he was quite sympathetic to Indira and soon enough she changed her religion, became a Muslim woman and married Feroze Khan in a London mosque. Nehru was not happy, Kamala was dead already or dying. The news of this marriage eventually reached Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi (better known as Mahatma Gandhi) . Gandhi urgently called Nehru and practically ordered him to ask the young man to change his name from Khan to Gandhi. It had nothing to do with change of religion, from Islam to Hinduism for instance. It was just a case of a change of name by an affidavit. And so Feroze Khan became Feroze Gandhi. The surprising thing is that the apostle of truth, the old man soon to be declared India 's Mahatma and the 'Father of the Nation' didn't mention this game of his in the famous book, 'My Experiments with Truth'. Why?

When they returned to India, a mock 'Vedic marriage' was instituted for public consumption. On this subject, writes M.O. Mathai (a long-time Private Secretary of Nehru) in his renowned

(but now suppressed by the GOI! ) 'Reminiscences of the Nehru Age' on page 94, second paragraph: ' For some inexplicable reason, Nehru allowed the marriage to be performed according to Vedic rites in 1942. An inter-religious and inter-caste marriage under Vedic rites at that time was not valid in law. To be legal, it had to be a civil marriage .' It's a known fact that after Rajiv's birth Indira and Feroze lived separately, but they were not divorced. Feroze used to harass Nehru frequently for money and also interfere in Nehru's political activities. Nehru got fed up and left instructions not to allow him into the Prime Minister's residence Trimurthi Bhavan. Mathai writes that the death of Feroze came as a relief to Nehru and Indira. The death of Feroze in 1960 before he could consolidate his own political forces, is itself a mystery. Feroze had even planned to remarry. Those who try to keep tabs on our leaders in spite of all the suppressions and deliberate misinformation, are aware of the fact that the second son of Indira (or Mrs. Feroze Khan) known as Sanjay Gandhi was not the son of Feroze. He was the son of another Muslim gentleman, Mohammad Yunus. Here in passing, we might mention that the second son was originally named Sanjiv. It rhymed with Rajiv, the elder brother's name. It was changed to Sanjay when he was arrested by the British police in England and his passport impounded, for having stolen a car.

Krishna Menon was then India 's High Commissioner in London. He offered to issue another passport to the felon who changed his name to Sanjay. Incidentally, Sanjay's marriage with the Sikh girl Menaka (now they call her Maneka for Indira Gandhi found the name of mythological Lord Indra's Court dancer rather offensive !!) took place quite surprisingly in Mohammad Yunus's house in New Delhi The marriage with Menaka who was a model (She had model for Bombay Dyeing wearing just a towel) was not so ordinary either. Sanjay was notorious in getting unwed young women pregnant. Menaka too was rendered pregnant by Sanjay. It was then that her father, Colonel Anand, threatened Sanjay with dire consequences if he did not marry her daughter and that did the trick. Sanjay married Menaka. It was widely reported in Delhi at the time that Mohammad Yunus was unhappy at the marriage of Sanjay with Menaka. Apparently he had wanted to get him married with a Muslim girl of his choice. It was Mohammad Yunus who cried the most when Sanjay died in the plane accident. In Yunus's book, 'Persons, Passions & Politics' one discovers that baby Sanjay had been

circumcised following Islamic custom, although the reason stated was phimosis. It was always believed that Sanjay used to blackmail Indira Gandhi and due to this she used to turn a blind eye when Sanjay Gandhi started to run the country as though it were his personal freedom. Was he black mailing her with the secret of who his real father was? When the news of Sanjay's death reached Indira Gandhi, the first thing she wanted to know was about the bunch of keys which Sanjay had with him. Nehru was no less a player in producing bastards. At least one case is very graphically described by M.O. Mathai in his 'Reminiscences of the Nehru Age', page 206. Mathai writes: 'In the autumn of 1948 a young woman from Benares arrived in New Delhi as a sanyasini named Shraddha Mata (an assumed and not a real name). She was a Sanskrit scholar well versed in the ancient Indian scriptures and mythology. People, including MPs, thronged to her to hear her discourses. One day S.D. Upadhyaya, Nehru's old employee, brought a letter in Hindi from Shraddha Mata. Nehru gave her an interview in the PM's house. As she departed, I noticed (Mathai is speaking here) that she was young, shapely and beautiful. Meetings of Nehru with her became rather frequent, mostly after he finished his work at night. During one of Nehru's visits to Lucknow, Shraddha Mata turned up there and Upadhyaya brought a letter from her as usual. Nehru sent her the reply and she visited Nehru at midnight...' Suddenly Shraddha Mata disappeared. In November 1949 a convent in Bangalore sent a decent looking person to Delhi with a bundle of letters. He said that a young woman from northern India arrived at the convent a few months ago and gave birth to a baby boy. She refused to divulge her name or give any particulars about herself. She left the convent as soon as she was well enough to move out but left the child behind. She however forgot to take with her a small cloth bundle in which, among other things, several letters in Hindi were found. The Mother Superior, who was a foreigner, had the letters examined and was told they were from the Prime Minister. The person who brought the letters surrendered them...'I (Mathai) made discreet inquiries repeatedly about the boy but failed to get a clue about his whereabouts. Convents in such matters are extremely tight-lipped and secretive. Had I succeeded in locating the boy, I would have adopted him. He must have grown up as a Catholic Christian blissfully ignorant of who his father was.' Coming back to Rajiv Gandhi, we all know now that he changed his so called Parsi religion to become a Catholic to marry Sania Maino of Turin, Italy. Rajiv became Roberto. His daughter's name is Bianca and son's name is Raul. Quite cleverly the same names are presented to the people of India as Priyanka and Rahul.

What is amazing is the extent of our people's ignorance in such matters. The press conference

that Rajiv Gandhi gave in London after taking over as Prime minister of India was very informative. In this press conference, Rajiv boasted that he was NOT a Hindu but a Parsi. Mind you, speaking of the Parsi religion, he had no Parsi ancestor at all. His grandmother (father's mother) had turned Muslim after having abandoned the Parsi religion to marry Nawab Khan. It is the western press that waged a blitz of misinformation on behalf of Rajiv. From the New York Times to the Los Angeles Times and the Washington Post, the big guns raised Rajiv to heaven. The children's encyclopaedias recorded that Rajiv was a qualified Mechanical Engineer from the revered University of Cambridge . No doubt US kids are among the most misinformed in the world today! The reality is that in all three years of his tenure at that University Rajiv had not passed a single exam. He had therefore to leave Cambridge without a certificate.

Sonia too had the same benevolent treatment. She was stated to be a student in Cambridge . Such a description is calculated to mislead Indians. She was a student in Cambridge all right, but not of the University of Cambridge, but of one of those fly by night language schools where foreign students come to learn English. Sonia was working as an 'au pair' girl in Cambridge and trying to learn English at the same time. And surprise of surprises, Rajiv was even cremated as per Vedic rites in full view of India's public. This is the Nehru dynasty that India worships and now a foreigner leads a prestigious national party because of just one qualification being married into the Nehru family. Maneka Gandhi, though Indian, herself is being accepted by the non-Congress parties not because she was a former model or an animal lover, but for her links to the Nehru family. Saying that an Italian (or any foreigner) should not lead India will amount to narrow mindedness, but if Sania Maino (now Sonia) had served India like, say, Mother Teresa or Annie Besant, i.e. in any way on her own rights, then all Indians should be proud of her just as how proud we are of Mother Teresa.

OR Saying that any other party which comes to rule India is better is again equally worse. The point is Indians who nominate the people to stand in these elections; and the people who vote their rulers (i.e. the authorities) must know that truth eventually comes out some day. Don't allow the famous land of India (our motherland) to be looked down by others.

Some hidden facts about the Nehru-Gandhi dynasty

By Bhagat on May 5th, 2011

Some hidden facts about the Nehru-Gandhi dynasty

The Nehru-Gandhi dynasty starts with the Mughal man named Ghiyasuddin Ghazi. He was the City Kotwal i.e. police officer of Delhi prior to the uprising of 1857, under the Mughal rule. After capturing Delhi in 1857, in the year of the mutiny, the British were slaughtering all Mughals everywhere. The British made a thorough search and killed every Mughal so that there were no future claimant to the throne of Delhi. The Hindus on the other hand were not targeted by the British unless isolated Hindus were found to be siding with the Mughals, due to past associations. Therefore, it became customary for many Mohammedans to adopt Hindu names. So, the man Ghiyasuddin Ghazi (the word means kafir-killer) adopted a Hindu name Gangadhar Nehru and thus saved his life by the subterfuge. Ghiyasuddin Ghazi apparently used to reside on the bank of a canal (or Nehr) near the Red Fort. Thus, he adopted the name Nehru as the family name. Through out the world, we do not find any descendant other than that of Gangadhar, having the surname Nehru. The 13th volume ofthe Encyclopedia of Indian War of Independence (ISBN:81-261-3745-9) by M.K. Singh states it elaborately. The Government of India have been hiding this fact.
City Kotwal was an important post like todays Commissioner of Police. It appears from Mughal records that there was no Hindu Kotwal employed. It was extremely unlikely for a Hindu to be hired for that post. Compulsorily only Mohammedans of foreign ancestry were hired for such important posts. Jawaharlal Nehrus second sister Krishna Hutheesing also mentions in her memoirs that her grandfather was the city Kotwal of Delhi prior to 1857s uprising when Bahadur Shah Zafar was still the sultan of Delhi. Jawaharlal Nehru, in his autobiography, states that he have seen a picture of his grandfather which portrays him like a Mughal nobleman. In that picture it appears that he was having long & very thick beard, wearing a Muslim cap and was having two swords in his hands. Jawaharlal Nehru also states in his autobiography that on their way to Agra (a seat of Mughal influence) from Delhi, the members of his grand fathers family were detained by the British. The reason for the detention was their Mughal features. They however pleaded that they were Kashmiri Pandits and thus got away. The Urdu literature of the 19thcentury, especially the works of Khwaja Hasan Nizami, are full of the miseries that the Mughals and Mohammedans have to face then. They also describe how Mughals escaped to other cities to save their lives. In all probability, Jawahar Nehrus Mughal grandfather and his family were among them. ~*~*~*~*~*~ Jawaharlal Nehru was a person that India adores. He was undoubtedly a very sound politician and a gifted individual. But, the Government of India has not built a memorial of Jawaharlal Nehru at his birth place 77 Mirganj in Allahabad, because it is a brothel. The entire locality is a well known red light area since long. It has not become a brothel recently, but it has been a brothel even before Jawaharlal

Nehrus birth. A portion of the same house was sold by his father Motilal Nehru to a prostitute named Lali Jaan and it came to be known as Imambada. If you have some doubt, you may visit the place. Several dependable sources and also encyclopedia.com & Wikipedia say this. Motilal Nehru along with his family, later shifted to Anand Bhawan. Remember that Anand Bhawan is Jawaharlal Nehrus ancestral house and not his birth place. M. O. Mathai of Indian Civil Service served as the Private Secretary to Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru. Mathai has written a book Reminiscences of the Nehru Age (ISBN-13: 9780706906219).In the book Mathai reveals that there was intense love affair between Jawaharlal Nehru and Edwina Mountbatten (wife of the last Viceroy to India, Louis Mountbatten). The romance was a source of great embarrassment for Indira Gandhi, who used to seek Maulana Abul Kalam Azads help in persuading her father to be little discreet about their relationship. Nehru with Lady Mountbotten

Also Nehru had love affair with Sarojini Naidus daughter Padmaja Naidu, whom Nehru got appointed as the Governorof Bengal. It is revealed that he used to keep her portrait in his bed room, which Indira would often remove. It caused some tension between father and daughter.
Apart from these ladies, Pandit Nehru had an affair with a sanyasin from Benares named Shraddha Mata. She was an attractive Sanskrit scholar well versed in the ancient Indian scriptures and mythology. When she conceived out of their illicit relationship, in 1949, in a convent in Bangalore, she insisted that Nehru should marry her. But, Nehru declined that because it could affect his political career. A son was born and he was kept at a Christian Missionary Boarding School. His date of birth is estimated to be 30th May, 1949. He may be in his early sixties now. Convents in such matters maintain secrecy to prevent humiliation of the child. Though Mathai confirmed the existence of the child, no efforts have ever been made to locate him. He must have grown up as a Catholic Christian blissfully ignorant of who his father was. Nehru and Shradda Mata Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose and Dr. Shyama Prasad Mukherjee were competitors of Jawaharlal Nehru for the post of Prime Minister of India and both of them died under mysterious circumstances. Knowing all these facts, is there any meaning of celebrating Nehrus birthday as Childrens Day? Presenting him as a different person to our children and hiding the truth, amounts to denying education to them. ~*~*~*~*~*~ As per the book The great divide: Muslim separatism and partition (ISBN-13:9788121205917) by S.C. Bhatt Jawaharlal Nehrus sister Vijaya Lakshmi eloped with her fathers employee Syud Hussain. Then Motilal Nehru forcefully took her back and got her married with another man named Ranjit Pandit.

Nehru ~*~*~*~*~*~ Indira Priyadarshini perpetuated immorality in the Nehru dynasty. Intellectual Indira was admitted in Oxford University but driven out from there for non-performance. She was then admitted to Shantiniketan University but, Guru Dev Rabindranath Tagore chased her out for bad conduct. After driven out of Shantiniketan, Indira became lonely as father was busy with politics and mother was dieing of tuberculosis in Switzerland. Playing with her loneliness, Feroze Khan, son of a grocer named Nawab Khan who supplied wines etc to Motilal Nehrus household in Allahabad, was able to draw close to her. The then Governor of Maharashtra, Dr. Shriprakash warned Nehru, that Indira was having an illicit relation with Feroze Khan. Feroze Khan was then in England and he was quite sympathetic to Indira. Soon enough she changed her religion, became a Muslim woman and married Feroze Khan in a London mosque. Indira Priyadarshini Nehru changed her name to Maimuna Begum. Her mother Kamala Nehru was totally against that marriage. Nehru was not happy as conversion to Muslim will jeopardize her prospect of becoming Prime Minister. So, Nehru asked the young man Feroze Khan to change his surname from Khan to Gandhi. It had nothing to do with change of religion from Islam to Hinduism. It was just a case of a change of name by an affidavit. And so Feroze Khan became Feroze Gandhi, though it is an inconsistent name like Bismillah Sarma. Both changed their names to fool the public of India. When they returned to India, a mock vedic marriage was instituted for public consumption. Thus, Indira and her descendants got the fancy name Gandhi. Both Nehru and Gandhi are fancy names. As a chameleon changes its colour, this dynasty have been changing its name to hide its real identity. Indira Gandhi had two sons namely Rajiv Gandhi and Sanjay Gandhi. Sanjay was originally named as Sanjiv that rhymed with Rajiv, his elder brothers name. Sanjiv was arrested by the British police for a car theft in the UK and his passport was seized. On Indira Gandhis direction, the then Indian Ambassador to UK, Krishna Menon misusing his power, changed his name to Sanjay and procured a new passport. Thus Sanjiv Gandhi came to be known as SanjayGandhi. It is a known fact that after Rajivs birth, Indira Gandhi and Feroze Gandhi lived separately, but they were not divorced. The book The Nehru Dynasty (ISBN 10:8186092005) by K. N. Rao states that the second son of Indira (or Mrs. Feroze Khan) known as Sanjay Gandhi was not the son of Feroze Gandhi. He was the son of another Muslim gentleman named Mohammad Yunus. Interestingly Sanjay Gandhis marriage with the Sikh girl Menaka took place in Mohammad Yunus house in New Delhi. Apparently Yunus was unhappy with the marriage as he wanted to get him married with a Muslim girl of his choice. It was Mohammad Yunus who cried the most when Sanjay Gandhi died in plane crash. In Yunus book, Persons, Passions & Politics (ISBN-10: 0706910176) one can discover that baby Sanjay was circumcised following Islamic custom.

It is a fact that Sanjay Gandhi used to constantly blackmail his mother Indira Gandhi, with the secret of who his real father is. Sanjay exercised a deep emotional control over his mother, which he often misused. Indira Gandhi chose to ignore his misdeeds and he was indirectly controlling the Government. When the news of Sanjay Gandhis death reached Indira Gandhi, her first question was Where are his keys and his wrist watch?. Some deep secrets about the Nehru-Gandhi dynasty seems to be hidden in those objects.The plane accident was also mysterious. It was a new plane that nosedive to a crash and yet the plane did not explode upon impact. It happens when there is no fuel. But the flight register shows that the fuel tank was made full before take-off. Indira Gandhi using undue influence of PMs office prohibited any inquiry from taking place. So, who is the suspect? Indira and Sanjay Gandhi The book The Life of Indira Nehru Gandhi (ISBN: 9780007259304) by Katherine Frank sheds light on some of Indira Gandhis other love affairs. It is written that Indiras first love was with her German teacher at Shantiniketan. Later she had affair with M. O. Mathai (fathers secretary), then Dhirendra Brahmachari (her yoga teacher) and at last with Dinesh Singh (Foreign Minister). Former Foreign Minister K Natwar Singh made an interesting revelation about Indira Gandhis affinity to the Mughals in his book Profile and Letters (ISBN: 8129102358). It states that- In 1968 Indira Gandhi as the Prime Minister of India went on an official visit to Afghanistan. Natwar Sing accompanied her as an IFS officer in duty. After having completed the days long engagements, Indira Gandhi wanted to go out for a ride in the evening. After going a long distance in the car, Indira Gandhi wanted to visit Baburs burial place, though this was not included in the itinerary. The Afghan security officials tried to dissuade her, but she was adamant. In the end she went to that burial place. It was a deserted place. She went before Baburs grave, stood there for a few minutes with head bent down in reverence. Natwar Singh stood behind her. When Indira had finished her prayers, she turned back and told Singh Today we have had our brush with history. Worth to mention that Babur was the founder of Mughal rule in India, from which the Nehru-Gandhi dynasty have descended. ~*~*~*~*~*~ It is difficult to count how many institutes of higher education are named after Rajiv Gandhi but, Rajiv Gandhi himself was a person of low calibre. From 1962 to 1965, he was enrolled for a Mechanical Engineering course at Trinity College, Cambridge. But, he left Cambridge without a degree because, he could not pass exams. Next year in 1966, he joined Imperial College, London but, again left it without a degree. K. N. Rao in the above said book alleges that Rajiv Gandhi became a Catholic to marry Sania Maino. Rajiv became Roberto. His sons name is Raul and daughters name is Bianca. Quite cleverly the same names are presented to the people of India as Rahul and Priyanka. In personal conduct Rajiv was very much a Mughal. On 15th August 1988 he thundered from the ramparts of the Red Fort: Our endeavor should be to take the country to heights to which it belonged

about 250-300 years ago. It was then the reign of Aurangzeb, the jeziya master and number one temple destroyer. The press conference that Rajiv Gandhi gave in London after taking over as prime minister of India was very informative. In this press conference, Rajiv boasted that he is not a Hindu but a Parsi. Feroze Khans father and Rajiv Gandhis paternal grandfather was a Muslim gentleman from the Junagadh area of Gujarat. This Muslim grocer by the name of Nawab Khan had married a Parsi woman after converting her to Islam. This is the source where from the myth of Rajiv being a Parsi was derived. Mind that he had no Parsi ancestor at all. His paternal grandmother had turned Muslim after having abandoned the Parsi religion to marry Nawab Khan. Surprisingly, Parsi Rajiv Gandhi was cremated as per Vedic rites in full view of Indian public. ~*~*~*~*~*~ Dr. Subramanian Swamy writes that Sonia Gandhis name was Antonia Maino. Her father was a mason. He was an activist of the notorious fascist regime of Italy and he served five years imprisonment in Russia. Sonia Gandhi have not studied beyond high school. She learnt some English from a English teaching shop named Lennox School at the Cambridge University campus. From this fact she boasts of having studied at the prestigious Cambridge University. After learning some English, she was a waitress at a restaurant in Cambridge town. Sonia Sonia Gandhi had intense friendship with Madhavrao Scindia in the UK, which continued even after her marriage. One night at 2 AM in 1982, Madhavrao Scindia and Sonia Gandhi were caught alone together when their car met an accident near IIT Delhi main gate. When Indira Gandhi and Rajiv Gandhi were Prime Ministers, PMs security used to go to New Delhi and Chennai international airports to send crates of Indian treasures like temple sculptures, antiques, paintings etc to Rome. Arjun Singh as CM and later as Union Minister in charge of Culture used to organize the plunder. Unchecked by customs, they were transported to Italy to be sold in two shops named Etnica & Ganpati, owned by Sonia Gandhis sister Alessandra Maino Vinci. Indira Gandhi died not because her heart or brain were pierced by bullets, but she died of loss of blood. After Indira Gandhi was fired upon, Sonia Gandhi strangely insisted that bleeding Indira Gandhi should be taken to Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital, in opposite direction to AIIMS which had a contingency protocol to precisely deal with such events. After reaching Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital, Sonia Gandhi changed her mind and demand that Indira Gandhi should be taken to AIIMS, thus wasting 24 valuable minutes. It is doubtful whether it was immaturity of Sonia Gandhi or a trick to speedily bring her husband to power. Rajesh Pilot and Madhav Rao Scindia were strong contenders to the Prime Ministers post and they were road blocks in Sonia Gandhis way to power. Both of them died in mysterious accidents.

There are circumstantial evidences pointing to the prima facie possibility that the Maino family have contracted LTTE to kill Rajiv Gandhi. Nowadays, Sonia Gandhi is quite unabashed in having political alliance with those like MDMK, PMK andDMK who praise Rajiv Gandhis killers. No Indian widow would ever do that. Such circumstances are many, and raise a doubt. An investigation into Sonias involvement in Rajivs assassination is necessary. You may read Dr. Subramanian Swamys book Assassination Of Rajiv Gandhi Unasked Questions and Unanswered Queries (ISBN : 81-220-0591-8). It contains indications of such conspiracy. ~*~*~*~*~*~ In 1992, Sonia Gandhi revived her citizenship of Italy under Article 17 of the Italian Citizenship Law. Under Italian law, Rahul and Priyanka are Italian citizens because Sonia was an Italian citizen when she gave birth to them. Rahul Gandhis Italian is better than his Hindi. Rahul Gandhi is an Italian citizen is relevant from the fact that on 27th September 2001 he was detained by the FBI at Boston airport, USA for traveling on an Italian passport. If a law is made in India that important posts like that of President and Prime Minister should not be held by a person of foreign origin, then Rahul Gandhi automatically disqualifies to contend for the post of Prime Minister. ~*~*~*~*~*~ After finishing school education, Rahul Gandhi got admission at the St. Stephens College in New Delhi, not on merit basis but on sports quota of rifle shooting. After a brief stay there in 1989-90, he did his BA from Rollins College, Florida in 1994. Just for doing BA one need not go to the US. The very next year, in 1995 he got M.Phil. degree from Trinity College, Cambridge. The genuineness of this degree is questioned as he has done M.Phil. without doing MA. Amaratya Sens helping hand is thought to be behind. Many of you might have seen the famous movie Munna Bhai MBBS. In 2008 Rahul Gandhi was prevented from using an auditorium of the Chandra Shekhar Azad University in Kanpur for a students rally. Subsequently, the Vice-Chancellor of the university, V.K. Suri, was ousted by the UP Governor. During 26/11 when the whole country was tense about how to tackle the Mumbai terror, Rahul Gandhi was lavishly partying with his friends till 5 AM. Rahul Gandhi advises austerity for all Congress members. He says it is the duty of all politicians to be austere. On the other hand he has a ministerial bungalow with a fully equipped gym. He is a regular member of at least two of the Delhis poshest gyms, one of which is 5-star rated. Rahul Gandhis trip to Chennai in 2009 to campaign for austerity cost the party more than Rs 1 Crore. Such inconsistencies show that initiatives taken by Rahul Gandhi are not his own but, workout of his party men only. During the 2007 election campaign in Uttar Pradesh, Rahul Gandhi said that if anyone from the NehruGandhi family had been active in politics then, the Babri Masjid would not have fallen. It doubtlessly shows his Mohammedan affiliation as a loyalty to his ancestors. On Dec 31, 2004, John M. Itty, a retired college professor in Alappuzha district of Kerala, contended that action should be taken against Rahul Gandhi and his girlfriend Juvenitta alias Veronica for staying together for three days at a resort in Kerela. It is a criminal offense under Immoral Trafficking Act as they are not married. Anyway, one more foreigner daughter-in-law is waiting to rule the tolerant Indians.

Rahul Gandhi with Veronica ~*~*~*~*~*~ The Swiss magazine Schweizer Illustriertes 11thNovember 1991 issue revealed that Rahul Gandhi was the beneficiary of accounts worth US $2 billion controlled by his mother Sonia Gandhi. A report from the Swiss Banking Association in 2006 revealed that the combined deposits of Indian citizens are far greater than any other nation, a total ofUS $1.4 trillion, a figure exceeding the GDP of India. This dynasty rules greater than half of India. Ignoring the center, out of 28 states and 7 union territories, more than half of them have Congress government at any point of time. Upto Rajiv Gandhi there was Mughal rule in India, with Sonia Gandhi, the Rome rule on India have started. ~*~*~*~*~*~ The objective behind writing this article is to acquaint the citizens of India with their national leaders and show how a dynasty has misused the democracy of this country. Several prestigious national assets and schemes are named after these lose-character people to immortalize them. Many other shocking facts are not presented in this article because of lack of supporting evidence. Vande mataram. _______________________________________________ Extracts from other sourcesThere are allegations that in the night of 3rd December 2006, Rahul Gandhi along with his foreigner friends gang raped then twenty four year old Sukanya Devi at a VIP Guest House in Amethi. She is the daughter of Balram Singh & Sumitra Devi of 23-12 Medical Choke, Sanjay Gandhi Marg, Amethi, Raebareli, Uttar Pradesh. Police refused to register complaint; the National Commission for Women headed by Dr. Girija Vyas acted as a Congress party office. The victim and her family is missing since then. ~*~*~*~*~*~ MOTILAL married and his first wife and son died at childbirth. MOTILAL and his second wife THUSSU (name changed to SWAROOP RANI) had three children THUSSU with MOBARAK ALI (Motilals Boss) was the first son JAWAHAR LAL NEHRU (he was circumcised) MOTILAL AND THUSSU had two daughters by name NAN (also called Vijaya Lakshmi) & KRISHNA MOTILAL had also two bastard sons out of Muslim women by name SHEIK ABDULLA &SYUD HUSSAIN __________ VIJAYA LAKSHMI eloped with SYUD HUSSAIN (half brother and sister) and had a girl CHANDRALEKHA

VIJAYALAKSHMI MARRIED R.S. PANDIT and had two more girls NAYANTARA & RITA JAWAHARLAL NEHRU married KAMALA KAUL (marriage never consummated) JAWAHARLAL had an affair with SARADDHA MATA (assumed name) and had a son given away to an orphanage in BANGALORE JAWAHARLAL had an affair with LADY MOUNTBATTEN but no children JAWAHARLAL HAD MANY AFFAIRS and in the end died of SYPHILIS KAMALA KAUL had an affair with MANZUR ALI (who is son of Mobark Ali who fathered Nehru also) and their daughter is INDIRA PRIYADARSINI NEHRU KAMALA KAUL had an affair with FEROZ KHAN (son of Nawab Khan who supplied liquor to their house) but no children __________ INDIRA was found in the bed with her GERMAN TEACHER at Shantiniketan INDIRA PRIYADARSINI nikhahed as per Islamic rites FEROZ KHAN after converting herself to Islam. Her new name was MAIMUNA BEGUM and both had changed their name to fool the public of India on the advice of Ghandi by an affidavit in a court to INDIRA GHANDI and FEROZ GANDHI INDIRA and FEROZ had one son by name RAJIV GHANDI (as per Islamic rites he was circumcised) INDIRA had an affair with MOHAMMED YOUNUS and had a second son SANJIV GHANDI (later the name changed to SANJAY GHANDI to escape prosecution in UK for car theft. He was circumcised as per Islamic rites) INDIRA had an affair with M.O. MATHAI (Nehrus steno) and a son was aborted INDIRA had an affair with DHIRENDRA BRAMMACHARI but no children INDIRA had an affair with DHINESH SINGH but no children FEROZ had an affair with TARAKESWARI SINHA FEROZ had an affair with MEHMUNA SULTANA

FEROZ had an affair with SUBHADRA JOSHI and many others.

Indira was an extraordinarily sexy girl. In fact she had been always on the 'prowl' for sex and was never under parental control. Mother Kamala Nehru was in fact a nonentity in the Nehru household constantly insulted and driven into a corner by the two sisters-in-law, Naan or Vijaylakshmi and the second daughter Krishna (who eventually became Krishna Hutheesingh). The father, Jawahar was never in the picture. He was too busy with his own political activities and pursuit of women of all kinds, be it an Edwina Mountbatten or a Hindu nun named Shraddha-mata. Unbeknown to everyone outside, Jawahar never consummated his wedding with this 'not so accomplished girl' from the vale of Kashmir. One might ask how come then that she gave birth to Indira Priyadarshini, whom Kamala loved very very much? Well, the truth of the matter is that the only person who had a few decent words for Kamala was Manzur Ali, the son of Mubarak Ali. The Alis were very close to the Nehrus and Manzur Ali, an accomplished man educated in Britain, was sorry for Kamala. And it came to pass that eventually, Manzur Ali (a Shia' man like his father Mubarak Ali), fathered Indira. Incidentally, it might be mentioned here that Mubarak Ali and NOT Motilal, had sired Jawahar. And hence, Manzur Ali and Jawahar Nehru were siblings. It is Indira's oversexed nature that had prevented her from completing her studies in London as well as in Bolpur, near Calcutta. In both places, she was too busy with her sexual proclivities and could not properly complete her education. In Oxford, she was told to leave the college for nonperformance. At Shantiniketan she was found with a European professor in a compromising position in his bedroom (in flagrante delicto) and Gurudev himself wrote to Jawahar to fly down from Delhi and take his daughter back to his place. At the time, so goes the story, the Gurudev had told Jawahar that his humble university (Vishwabharati) could not handle his daughter, as her demands were too high for Bolpur. That was the end of Indira's formal education. But that would not be a true evaluation of Indira's capabilities. She was extremely intelligent but not so industrious. She lived in Geneva where her sick mother, suffering from tuberculosis, was undergoing a long treatment in a hospital. In that short period, Indira mastered quite a bit of conversational French (they speak French in Geneva). Later, much later, as the Prime Minister of India, she was once invited by France's General de Gaulle at the Elysee Palace; there Indira had impressed the President of France enormously, as had been privately acknowledged by the President of France himself. Apparently, de Gaulle had predicted great things for Indira in the future as India's leader. It may be mentioned here that there was a time when the relation between the father and the daughter was very strained. It took place when Indira had made up her mind to 'nikaah' Nawab Khan's good-for-nothing son, Firoz. They got 'nikaahed' in a mosque in London and it was to make things smoother, the wily Gandhi, suggested the name change, from Khan to Gandhi, supposedly a Parsi name. Otherwise, things could have gone haywire. The entire Nehru family, specially Kamala Nehru had always been totally against Indira's marriage with Firoz, a stupid man. It was then that Indira told her father that she would like to leave India and settle down abroad

with Firoz. At that Jawahar lost his temper and said loudly that she should know that Indira was NOT Jawahar's son. That by such threats Indira was not going to frighten her father. Now, how do we know that? This father-daughter converstaion took place in Jawahar's office in New Delhi. Next to Jawahar's office was another office occupied by a Muslim gentleman named Mobarak Mazdur, also a barrister. In later years Mobarak Mazdur migrated to Calcutta and settled in the Park Circus area, where I had gone specifically to meet him and discuss ths subject of fatherdaughter quarrel of the time. It was only then that it transpired that Indira was NOT Jawahar's daughter and the name of Manzur Ali cropped up later. Mr. Mobarak Mazdur was fully conversant with the entire father-daughter conversation but he did not divulge it at the time. When I met Mobarak Mazdur (it was a few years before his death), I found Mr. Mazdur extremely annoyed with Jawahar and he poured fourth his contempt for the so called Kashmiri Brahmin which exceeded my wildest expectations. It is true that Nawab Khan had married a Parsi woman but her family name was NOT Gandhi. Also, she had changed her faith to Islam at the time of her 'nikaah' with Nawab Khan, as is often the custom with India's Mohammedans. It was circulated to the people (mostly for the consumption of the Hindus) in India that by virtue of the fact that Nawab Khan's wife was a Parsi, Firoz too could be considered a Parsi and Parsis are in fact quasi Hindus and Nehru arranged a Vedic wedding between Indira and Firoz. The fact of Nawab Khan's Parsi wife's change of religion was brushed aside and Firoz was painted as a non-Mohammedan. All this, just to make the 'nikaah' a little more acceptable to the larger mostly Hindu public. After his death, Firoz had been cremated like the Hindus and not buried in the Islamic fashion. It is a pity that by doing so we lost all options for a DNA test. Contd... jitendershooda July 24th, 2005, 08:49 PM Contd... Obviously, the argument is false. If it were not, then, the son of Sharmila Tagore, the Mohammedan wife to be of Pataudi, who is called by the name of Saif (or sword) Ali should have been a Hindu Brahmin. Sharmila Tagore too had been 'nikaahed' by the Mohammedan Pataudi AFTER having converted her to Islam, her new name being Ayesha Sultana. How about the two children of the genuine Parsi woman of a renowned Mumbai family, Honey Irani, sister of Daisy Irani. Javed Akhtar 'nikaahed' her but we still don't know her Mohammedan name after conversion to Islam. Both her children, a boy and a girl were given Arabic names following Islamic custom, Forhan for the boy and Joya for the girl. Not only that; when Javed Akhtar who had been playing with the notorious Shabana gal under the pretext of producing the 'Tumhari Amrita' one-woman drama and finally decided to 'talaq' Honey Irani, the most unholy operation was done quietly, quietly because none of the secular media even mentioned about the criminal act. Honey Irani, the mother in her twilight years was denied the company of her two children while the rascal Javed married Shabana openly under the protection of the diabolical Muslim Personal law. In accordance with the laws of the Sharia, Javed kept custody of both their children thus leaving the unhappy mother Honey Irani, all alone, in her old age. Javed, in the mean time, 'nikaahed' Shabana. Such is the situation of our Dharma-Rajya today and no doubt the culprits are having their final judgment in the most horrible ways: self-provoked fatal accident (in the

case of Sanjiv aka Sanjay), slaughter (in the case of Indira Priayadarshini or Maimuna Begum as she was reported to have been named after her 'nikaah' with Firoz Khan aka Gandhi), pulverization (in the case of Rajiv at that election meet in South India, by a Catholic lady), the old Gandhi had already met his death in the hands of Nathuram; and of course in the case of Jawahar himself who died an unexpected death. He died of a self-inflicted malady called syphilis. I believe this is what happens when the leaders play with the honest sentiments of the people of the country and cheat the nation. It is quite clear now, after the fact, that it was the Islamic ancestry of Jawahar and Indira that was primarily responsible for Jawahar's refusal to the Indian army to get back the lost areas of Kashmir to the tribals when the troubles first started in 1947, and Indira's handing over the 93,000 Paki troops to Pakistan after the Bangladesh war in 1971. Indira never brought up the subject of genocide of unarmed Hindu men, women and children in Islamic Bangladesh in 1971). Let us now go back to the original story. In the artcle titled SHE, M.O. Mathai (the then private secretary of Jawahar, hailing from South India, of Catholic faith) writes that Indira had two sons before she became pregnant again. He also tells us in his article that this third baby was aborted and the relevant details are provided in the article SHE by Mathai himself. Those among our readers who would have the time and energy to do some private investigation can find out that the first son of Indira, Rajiv, was fathered by Firoz. After the birth of Rajiv, when Firoz tried to poison Indira by pouring powdered glass in her milk (all details are provided in the article SHE), the conjugal relations between Indira and Firoz terminated. The question arises, who then sired Sanjeev or Sanjay? It was Mohammad Yunus, a long time resident in the Nehru household. One needs to procure a copy of Yunus' book titled: PERSONS, PASSIONS AND POLITICS (Vikas Publishing House, Ghaziabad). It is in Mohammad Yunus' place that Sanjay had been circumcised within a week of the baby's birth under the pretext that the baby suffered from 'phimosis', a common but wrong excuse. Rajiv had been circumcised in Firoz's place, also in Islamic fashion. Indira was party to that function, the same Indira who would tell M.O. Mathai that she would hate to have a Hindu as her husband. There is something else that needs airing. Indira had hired Mohammad Yunus in the Foreign Office. A great deal of Yunus' escapades is mentioned in Yunus' book. Yunus' son's name was Adil Shahryar. He was arrested by the US anti-corruption department on charges of importing illegal substance and put in US prison for felony and was given a sentence of 35 years. All these years, Yunus had been biding his time and as soon as Rajiv became the prime minister (perhaps the dumbest prime minister India has ever had!), Mohammed Yunus showed his true colors. He told Rajiv that he did not know how, but Rajiv had to get the release of Adil Shahriyar. Otherwise, Yunus threatened to publicly release the Netaji papers of which Yunus had been made the custodian by Nehru himself while still alive (which Yunus still is and the Indian public has still not a clue about the Netaji papers!) Eventually, Rajiv did get the release of Adil Shahryar by going right up to Ronald Reagan under the pretext of conducting the FESTIVAL OF INDIA campaign. It is not easy to visualize Rajiv to be such a smart man. No doubt that there is a coterie of highly influential, intelligent but anti-national or treasonous men and women, I suspect leftists and Mohammedans, operating inside India to advise men like Rajiv, that need to be exposed to the nation!

Now comes the final question: why did Indira abort her third son? This son, if he had been allowed to be born and to grow up like the other two, no doubt he would have looked quite different from his elder half brothers, Rajiv and Sanjay. Why? For the simple reason that both the other fathers, Firoz and Yunus were of different, in other words, of North Indian descent while M.O. Mathai was from South India. Naturally, if this third baby had come to this world, he would have looked quite different from his other two brothers, although in every likelihood he would have been much smarter than Rajiv and Sanjiv or Sanjay. Indira could not face the possibility of the public embarrassment that could have taken place and as a rotten mother, opted for abortion of the baby. No doubt, a part of her punishment when Satwant Singh and Beant Singh shot her down, stemmed from this acton of Indira's! And hence, the smart Indira put a stop to the situation from developing. Although in his article SHE, Mathai does not spell it out, his heart surely had broken when he discovered the truth but did not mention it to the readers. Obviously, Mathai left the readers to discover the real reason for the sacrifice of his son in the hands of this virago, who would order wholesale slaughter of innocent men, women and children on a Gurpurab Day, at the holy temple of the HARI MANDIR SAHIB at Amritsar. However sad we might be, let us console ourselves that the revenge of our God has been quite adequte. Not only did He claim His pound of flesh by a similar punishment of the mother but also of the son. The curse of the Nehru dynasty brought upon us due to our shortsightedness and mindless hero-worship when the 'hero' had already been replaced by our enemies with all outward false and unholy parapharnelia to pass them off as Kashmiri Brahmins; Brahmins who would learn Persian and Urdu and not Sanskrit and an Indian homegrown language; who would be invited by Saudi Arabia to visit Mecca during the Haj ceremony! How blind can we be?

SHE written by M O Mathai

"SHE" Foreword:This article has a short but important history. It was written on June 23, 1977 by no less a person than M.O. Mathai. He was then Indian Prime Minister Jawahar Lal Nehru's private secretary. Mathai was an intelligent and competent man from south India, a Catholic by religion like many south Indians, and quite courageous to have written the two well-known books alleged experiences of Nehru and his times, which became controversial.: (1) Reminiscences of the Nehru Age, and, (2) My Days with Nehru, where he has, for the first time, divulged many secrets of the high and the mighty of the Nehru years. He has also written the book SHE. M.O. Mathai (1909-1981) was assistant to India's first Prime Minister, Jawaharlal Nehru. Mathai worked with the United States Army in India before becoming an assistant to Nehru in 1946. He resigned in 1959 following Communist allegations of misuse of power. One of Mathai's letters (UO No D/S13170 of 2/12/1954) digged out by the Delhibased non-profit trust Mission Netaji had become controversial in 2006.[1] The letter indicated that the ashes of Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose was received in India in the 1950s. This information is contradictory to the Indian government's opinion that Bose's ashes are kept in Renkoji temple in Japan. Mathai died in 1981 of a heart attack in Madras at the age of 72 years. However, the article that our readers are going to read, was not an ordinary article of a descriptive nature. It has many references to Mathai's personal interaction with Indira Gandhi (nee Nehru). The article was originally supposed to be a part of Mathai's book, 'Reminiscences of the Nehru Age' but for obvious reasons, at the last moment, it was left out of the book. I received a copy of the article, (which I am sharing with our readers), soon after its appearance in the form of an article by an unknown author but it does not take too much grey matter to guess who is writing and about whom. Our readers will judge. A great deal of what Mathai is telling us in these pages, are already known to intelligent, informed readers; however, these few pages are surely quite readable although the actors and actresses of the old drama are now gone, many with their past glory tarnished! It was to hide the tarnish that so much trouble had been taken to keep these few pages hidden from the general public, at the time. In India, the general public has always been and still is the outsider, never mind what the politicos say! She has Cleopatra's nose, Pauline Bonaparte's eyes and the breasts of Venus. She has hair on her limbs which have to be shaven frequently. Physically and mentally she is more of a male than a female. I would call her a manly woman.I met her first in her ancestral home in the winter of 1945. She then had a baby son of crawling age and who was a cry baby. My first reaction was that she was a conceited girl with unhappiness written all over her face. Her second son, born in December, 1946, was an unwanted child. As a baby he had to be circumcised to remove a defect. By 1947 her cup of unhappiness was full and fortune took possession of her face.In the autumn of 1946 her

father gave her a small Austin car. She wanted me to teach her driving. In the initial stages I used to take her to the Viceroy's bodyguard's Polo Ground for lessons. She was quick in learning. Then I stopped the driving lessons because she was getting into the advanced stage of pregnancy. I told her I didn't want her to take any risk going into the open roads learning driving. Her second son was born in the middle of December 1946. By the middle of February 1947 she was ready to resume driving lessons. We went into the roads and to Connaught Circus. Then I told her "you just imagine that you know everything, concentrate, consider the person driving a car from the opposite direction is a fool, and go along with confidence driving the car, take a round of Connaught Circus and come back". She did that and returned in triumph. The driving lessons ended there.Before the middle of 1947 she asked me to take her out to a cinema. From then on we used to go out for pictures as often as I was free - which was not frequent. She looked forward to taking me out driving over the Ridge with the jungle on either side. She hated small cars. So we used to go in my car which was a Plymouth. She liked to go into the wilds where there were ruins. Drives to regions beyond Qutab Minar were favored. One day, during an aimless drive, she told me complainingly "You do not love me". I said "I do not know; I had not thought about it". By the autumn of 1947 I knew she had fallen headlong in love with me without my taking any initiative in the matter. Her face would light up on seeing me. She started talking to me about herself. She said that some time after her marriage, she discovered that her husband was not faithful to her. This came to her as a great shock because she married him in the teeth of opposition from every member of the family. She said she began to lose her saris, coats, blouses, shoes and handbags. She suspected the servants until she discovered some of her lost things on the persons of two women at a party. These women were known to be friendly with her husband. She also found out to which women her husband had given the books stolen from her book-shelves.She made it known rather discreetly what her intentions were about me. I told her I had two inhibitions: (1) I did not like to fool around with married women; (2) my loyalty to her father prohibited anything such as she had in mind. She was immediately forthcoming about No.1. She assured me that some time ago she had stopped having anything to do with her husband. She added: "I can no longer bear the thought of his touching me". She further confided in me "fortunately he has also gone impotent though he retained his attraction to women". About No. 2 she was angry with me and asked "What has my father got to do with it? Am I a minor?" Since then she spent as much time with me as possible and ridiculed me for my attitude to her father in so far as she was concerned. But I continued to resist gently. I was not mentally prepared or reconciled as yet.On the 18th November 1947 she took me to her room and kissed me full on the lips and told me "I want to sleep with you; take me to the wilds tomorrow evening". I told her that I had very little experience with women. She said "all the better". So on the 19th, which was her birthday, we went driving out and chose a place in the wilderness. On our way back I told her that I had some revulsion about milk in her breasts (though she had stopped breast-feeding the child a while ago). Afterward, she did something about it and soon went completely dry. She discovered

that I knew little about sex, and gave me two books, one of them by Dr. Abraham Stone about sex and female anatomy. I read them with profit.She was not promiscuous; neither did she need sex too frequently. But in the sex act she had all the artfulness of French women and Kerala Nair women combined. She loved prolonged kissing and being kissed in the same fashion. She had established a reputation of being cold and forbidding. She was nothing of the kind. It was only a pose as a feminine measure of self-protection. She was a passionate woman who was exceptionally good as a wriggler in bed. During the twelve years we were lovers, I was never satisfied with her.Progressively she became hostile to the fat female family friend who used to come to stay. Ever since she saw the family friend welcoming me on arrival with a hug and an innocent kiss on my cheek, she became jealous and livid with rage against the family friend. Occasionally the family friend used to ask me to take her and my "she" to a good cinema whenever there was one in town. My "she" could cleverly see to it that I did not sit near the family friend but only next to her as third in the row. The day before the next time the family friend was expected to arrive "she" asked me to take her out into the wilds after sundown. In the car I asked her 'what is the big idea? I have some urgent work to do'. She replied 'as long as the fat one is here, I will keep away from you because I do not want you to touch me after she has touched you.' I assured her that I had absolutely no interest in the fat one. Eventually, 'she' got used to the fat one's friendly welcome and departure gestures to me.She tried hard to persuade me to occasionally go up to her room while her husband was there, sit down and talk to them both. I told her that I had no intention of practicing deception. So she used to bring him to my study occasionally.She used all kinds of devices to ensure that her children spent as little time with their father as possible. She told me that she did not want any influence of their father on them because she was convinced that his influence would be bad for them. She concluded by saying: "I do not want my children to grow up as champion liars." This was one of the reasons why her husband was shifted to a separate room.Once I mentioned to her something which her husband had told me. She said: "Don't believe a word of what he says. I have learnt it to my bitter cost". She wrote to A.C.N. Nambiar, whom she had known personally for a long time and who was also a friend of her father and mother, asking for his opinion about divorcing her husband. She knew that Nambiar was a dear friend of mine. Nambiar replied to her to say that under certain circumstances it was preferable to have a clear break to living in make-believe. I did not encourage her in this matter, mostly for the sake of her father.One day, she told me that she could not bear the thought of being married to a Hindu. I told her "It is a compliment to the galaxy of great men Hinduism has produced through the ages".I never encouraged her to come to my bedroom. On one occasion she came. It was past midnight. I was fast asleep, having worked till midnight; she lay down beside me and gently woke me up by a kiss. I asked her "What is the matter?" She said: "I had to come". I did not know if she had been troubled in mind. I told her: "Let us lie here quietly and do nothing unless you want to". She said: "On this occasion, I only want to be with you". She lay there relaxed till about 4 in the morning, and gently tip-toed to her room upstairs. Before going away she told me: "I never told you that once I thought of committing suicide. Such thoughts do not come to me any more. You have

given

me

back

my

happiness."

Once, early in our life of love, she told me, "I never knew what real sex was until I had you". At the height of her passion in bed, she would hold me tight and say "Oh, Bhupat, I love you". She loved to give and receive nick-names. She gave me the name of Bhupat the dacoit, and I promptly gave her the name of Putli, the dacoitess. In private we used to call each other by these names. About her protestations of love in her romantic excitement, I quoted to her once two passages from Byron's Don Juan:"Man's love is a man's life, a thing apart,It is a woman's whole existence.In her first passion woman loves her lover;In all others all she loves is love".She replied, "all right, I want you to tell me as often as possible, not in bed, that you love me". I tried my best to oblige her. In fact, there was no difficulty, for I had fallen deeply in love with her.One evening, I found her disturbed. When she saw me, she burst into tears. I asked her what had happened. She said that when she came from her dressing room to drink her usual glass of milk, she discovered that there was finely powdered glass in it. The powder was floating on the thick cream. At the first sip she immediately sensed it in her mouth and spat it out. She said that from her dressing room she heard her husband sneaking into her bedroom and making an exit. She controlled herself, put her arms round me and holding me tight, said: "Oh, Mackie, I love you; I am so glad you came up." In the Constellation plans on our first visit abroad together, she was all excitement when we were in sight of Mont Blanc. She said softly to me, "I like the Queen Bee, I would like to make love high up in the air". I asked her:"Didn't you ever dream of soaring higher up like an eagle and surveying the world? I woke up from such a dream once and found myself on the floor, for I had fallen from the bed without breaking any bones". She knew I was pulling her leg. On reaching London, she found out the first free meal-time for her, and arranged for me to take her to a quiet restaurant. On reaching the restaurant, I asked her to order the food; I said I would have the same as hers with the addition of six large raw oysters on ice with appropriate sauce to begin with. She said she too would have it. The main dish she ordered was veal. She said "Ever since I arrived here, I have been dying to eat veal". I asked her if ever she had read Vatsayana's Kama Sutra. She said, "No, why?" I told her Vatsayana had prescribed veal for young couple for six months before marriage. She had not even read the Ramayana or the Mahabaharata. Her knowledge of the Ramayana was only what her grandmother had told her. In many ways, she was a denationalized person. She did not like artificial birth-control aids. Once in the early fifties she got pregnant by me. She decided to have an abortion done. She went to the British High Commission doctor whom she knew personally; but he refused to help. So she went to her ancestral home and got in touch with a lady doctor whom she knew personally and in whom she had perfect confidence. On this trip she took her second son with her. After a fortnight the mother and the little son returned with the good news that the boy was cured of his defect in speech in the natural process. Earlier he could not pronounce "R", and the mother was worried about it; she was in frantic search for a speech-correction expert. On the day of her return, she told me that the whole thing came out without any medication or aid.Was the father aware of her attachment to me? The answer is in the affirmative. Every time he had to go out for dinner, he knew where to find her. Fifteen

minutes before the time of departure, she would come fully decked up and sit in front of me in my study. At the stroke of the appointed time the father would pass my study and call her out. In the winter of 1958 I happened to see something by sheer chance. Immediately after lunch, I went to convey some urgent information to her. She had already closed the door. I knocked; after about five minutes she half-opened the door and peeped out. I discovered that the curtains were drawn and a tall, youngish handsome, bearded man a Brahmacahri - was in the room. I came away saying "I had something to tell you; but I shall say it later". That was the end of our relationship. She tried to make me believe several times that the scene I witnessed meant nothing more than some "yoga" and "spiritual" lessons. I gave her the definite impression that I was not interested in her explanations. Gradually she grew bitter against me. In fact, ultimately she became my deadly enemy - which constantly reminded me of the famous couplet of William Congrave:"Heaven has no rage like love to hatred turned; nor hell a fury like a woman scorned."Within a fortnight of the incident I collected all her passionate letters and returned them to her. A year later I came across some more in my old papers. They were also returned to her.There is an erroneous belief among some that she and her husband came together during the last two years of the husband's life. Enough had happened in their lives that a reunion of hearts was not humanly possible. It is true that she was kind and considerate to him during his illness. Certain things were done during this period and more specially at the cremation and collection of the ashes of the husband and well advertised to give certain desired impressions. They were all for public consumption, for, by that time, she had emerged as a full-fledged political animal.

================================================== Afterword: A few clarifications, now that the readers had a look at the material presented by no less a person than M.O. Mathai himself on Indira (aka Maimuna Begum).Indira used to 'shave her limbs'; read that as 'her pubic hairs'. This is an Islamic practice forced today on the Afghan population by the Talibans in Afghanistan. There is nothing extraordinary in her statement that she would not like to get married to a Hindu man, although she used to have unauthorized sex with the Hindu 'brahmachari' in her own bed room.That her second son (the bastard son by Mohammad Yunus) Sanjay (aka Sanjiv) had circumcision is no secret now. Why blame an unknown and imagined 'defect'? It was done only to leave the seal of Islam, exactly as it had been done on Jawahar in the palace of the nawab of Oudh. Her inordinate love to eat veal can be tolerated but not the false explanation of circumcision. The entire Nehru family was of Islamic roots of unknown pedigree and they now plan to hand over the country today, to an ill-bred Catholic woman of unknown pedigree.That she had the abortion of her third baby, the one sired by Mathai, is not known by many. But the matter was hushed up by the excuse of 'speech-defect' of the baby son, Sanjiv (he was not name-changed to Sanjay as yet, after the car theft in London and to procure a separate Indian passport to evade the London police). Now we know that it is hard to pronounce the letter 'R'!That Firoz

was a liar does not come to us a surprise! Didn't the school boys use to chant:"Gali gali men shor hai,Rajiv Gandhi chor hai?"And to think that no one had told them that the bastard son of Indira was the Bofors thief, which fact even any of the Indian leaders have not yet been able to decipher! And how could a fornication-prone thief like Firoz, hide the fact from a smart broad like Indira (aka Maimuna Begum), his own wife, for, it is widely accepted that Indira was indeed much smarter than Firoz. That Indira had no or little knowledge of the Ramayana and the Mahabharata, was suspected by many. Did she know anything at all of the Koran? She was after all invited by the Saudi king to attend the Hajj ceremony at Mecca which information was also suppressed by our foolish media persons. If Indira learnt the rudiments of the Ramayana from her grandmother, the question still remains, which one? Jawahar's mother or Kamla Nehru's (nee Kaul) mother! We happen to know the name of Jawahar's mother; it was Thussu which was changed later to Swarup Rani. None of us seem to know the name of Kamla Kaul's mother.The fact of Firoz's cremation is very interesting. It was done only to fool the Hindus of India. This Sunni musalman son of Nawab Khan, the liquor vendor of Allahabad, converted to Catholicism by Sonia's petulance at Orbassano, Italy, had died and been cremated like the kafir Hindus but was not buried in accordance with the tenets of Islam. Then what happened to him? Did he go to the Jannat at all? Did he have the 72 houries and the 28 gilmans (pearl-like boys)? No one tells us that! It is amazing that the Indian media is headed by a bunch of idiots and that situation needs to be corrected as early as possible. I am sure that the short write up by Mathai has done a world of good for our readers and eventually the larger public in India. Rest assured, all India is now reading our web-site and discovering the truth for the first time. The truth will surely eventually come out in full, for all to know and eventually they will all act as true sons of the soil. At the moment, our India is chock a block with traitors, starting from the President, Michael Kocheril Raman Narayanan to Gujral, Kuldip Nayyar, Shabana Azmi, Javed Akhtar, Dilip Kumar, Mani Shankar Aiyar, K. Natwar Singh, retired ambassador Abid Husain, Mukarram Husain et al and a host of others!And a thought about Firoz's attempt to poison his own wife! Was it the same incident that had prompted Indira to poison Lal Bahadur Shastri at Tashkent? Who knows?

The Truth About Indira Indira had a unique affair with India. As she grew older it turned more passionate and powerful. She was true to her love till the last. P.D.Tandon Katherine Frank visited me twice or thrice with her late husband. She wanted an interview with me about Indira Gandhi. She was so pleasant that I found it difficult to say no, but I suspected her intentions. I gently enquired: "How much would you pay me for the interview? I never give free interviews like most Congressmen." She replied: "I have no resources to pay for interviews." The matter ended there, but we met once or twice again over a cup of tea. I was glad I had not given her an interview when I read her book. I do not know in what ways she would have dragged me into her smutty biography. Frank's appetite for gossip and carnality is gluttonous. She has talked about Indira's abortion, her relationship with Mathai, Dinesh Singh and Dhirendra Brahmachari, while admitting that, "it has never been proved one way or another that she (Indira) had many lovers. M.O. Mathai's books were published more than 20 years ago, so his claim of having had a long affair with Indira isn't breaking news. Mathai is also a suspect witness, as are the other men who proclaimed themselves to have been her lovers. I think it unlikely that she had any lovers, but one can't be...sure." I'm perhaps the only person who was fortunate to see the Nehrus and Gandhis at close quarters for many years. I was eyewitness to many things at Anand Bhavan and at Nehru's official residence in Delhi. Anand Bhavan was my second home for long and I was treated like family. This, perhaps, entitles me to relate incidents about the Nehrus and prove that Frank's book is full of untruth and gossip. Dhirendra Brahmachari was a frequent visitor to Anand Bhavan. He was really a very handsome man. Nehru had asked him to teach Indira yoga to improve her health. Sometimes Nehru himself watched Indira do yoga under Brahmachari's guidance. When people heard about it, tongues began to wag. Katherine met such people and used the gossip to sell her book. That is unfair to a person who cannot contradict her. Mathai was my good friend. No one in the Nehru family liked him because of his ugliness. One day as Vijayalakshmi Pandit and I were talking on Nehru's verandah, Mathai arrived in a tonga, with a crate of cold drinks. I asked her who the man was. "Bhai's gift to Anand Bhavan," she laughed. It was Mathai's efficiency, however, that won Nehru over and none dared oppose him openly. Consequently, Mathai acquired enormous power as Nehru's private secretary. One day, I saw a well-dressed person waiting in Mathai's room in the prime minister's house. I asked Mathai who he was. "Chaprasi," said Mathai. The gentleman was in fact a big industrialist. This attitude made Mathai many enemies and led to his downfall. After his dismissal, he turned bitter against Nehru, and drink became his greatest solace. In his more sober moments, he planned to take revenge on Nehru by maligning Indira. He shifted from Nehru's house to a bungalow where I visited him once or twice. He told me he was writing a book which would survive him. He wrote the book, and it survived, but only for those who deal

with muck. Indira had a weakness for smart, intelligent and well-dressed men. Dinesh Singh was one such MP. He had easy access to Indira's home and office. Dinesh started talking about his relationship with her. In due course, the news reached Indira. One day while talking to me, she said, "P.D., I feel sick when I hear certain things. I had not envisaged such things.... Did you?" A few days later I heard her angrily tell someone: "Don't mention the name of that undesirable man before me." No one had the guts to write about Nehru's 'affairs' as long as he was alive. A few years after he died, his sex life came to be written about. Luckily, Janet Morgan, Edwina Mountbatten's private secretary and closest friend wrote her biography where she nailed those lies. All her life, Indira was a lonely woman. Her intimate American friend Dorothy Norman stated: "Frequent family imprisonments before independence left in their wake a lifelong loneliness and hunger for love and friendship." Frank's sick mind converts this loneliness into prurience. Indira had a unique love affair with India. As she grew older, it became more powerful and more passionate. She remained true to her love till the last. Feroze Gandhi courted Indira for several years, but she did not accept his proposal. Nehru never interfered in his daughter's affairs. But when she did decide to marry Feroze, loads of letters started coming to Nehru, condemning the alliance. Some letters were received by Acharya Kripalani, many by Gandhiji and a few by me, saying: "If you have the courage and guts, denounce this alliance." Once Indira decided to marry, she stuck to her decision despite the fact that Nehru wasn't happy about it. Once, I was standing near the steps leading to Nehru's room. Thrice, he nearly came down and went back again, but didn't go to his drawing room where some people awaited him. Then he came down again and asked me to come up. He took me to his library and said: "I've been getting letters asking me about Feroze. You meet him and send relevant details to the papers." I carried out his instructions and sent a paragraph about Feroze to the papers I represented. When Feroze died in 1960, Indira wrote to family friend Mohd Yunus: "I feel so utterly desolate. You know more than anyone else how much Feroze and I disagreed and quarrelled over the years, yet instead of separating or slackening the bond of friendship, we were closer than before. We had a wonderful holiday together, a month in a houseboat in Srinagar, and made plans for the future. The boys are of an age when they need a father more than a mother. I feel lost and empty and dead. Yet life must go on."