Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
(3) The long term consequences of maternal deprivation might include the following (counter argument: Harlows Monkeys): delinquency (Supporting evidence: 44 Thieves) reduced intelligence increased aggression depression (4) The childs attachment relationship with their primary caregiver leads to the development of an internal working model The internal working model is a cognitive framework comprising mental representations for understanding the world, self and others The primary caregiver acts as a prototype for interactions in the future (Supporting evidence: 44 Thieves and Strange Situation)
Characteristics of Attachment
Safe Haven: When the child feel threatened or afraid, he or she can return to the caregiver (Mother) for comfort and soothing. Secure Base: The caregiver provides a secure and dependable base for the child to explore the world. Proximity Maintenance: The child strives to stay near the caregiver, thus keeping the child safe. Separation Distress: When separated from the caregiver, the child will become upset and distressed.
Development of Attachment through Evolution, passing it down for survival and other stuff like that
Because human infants, like other mammalian infants, cannot feed or protect themselves, they are dependent upon the care and protection of "older and wiser" adults. A figure that an individual can depend on provides sanctuary in times of need or danger, and therefore strengthens the chance of survival Bowlby argued that, over the course of evolutionary history, infants who were able to maintain proximity to an attachment figure via attachment behaviors would be more likely to survive to a reproductive age, and therefore through the process of natural selection, only those who have innate attachment instincts remained
the reason for the anti-social behavior and emotional problems in the first group was due to maternal deprivation Evaluation: evidence comprises mainly of retrospective data inaccuracy of memory experimenter bias Bowlby designed and conducted this experiment himself Bowlby diagnosed affectionless psychopathy himself only shows a correlation between maternal deprivation and affectionless psychopathy it is not a cause-effect relationship due to other variables such as diet, income, education
Lorenz - The Gosling Experiment Previous Knowledge: Lorenz knew that upon hatching, ducklings will become socially bonded with the first moving object that they come upon Procedure and Findings: Lorenz reared some goslings (young geese) from the moment they hatched, and found that as the goslings grew up, they would follow him about, and courted him in preference to other geese Lorenz also showed that goslings can also develop a social bond with inanimate objects, such as a white ball Analysis and Conclusion: He called this social bonding imprinting, because he thought that the bond is somehow permanently and immediately stamped onto the nervous system from the moment of birth (this is actually not true, as most researchers now believe that attachment develops through a series of stages, see Schaffer and Emerson 1964) Lorenz showed that parental attachment is an innate behavior, and somewhat learnt as well, because repeated exposure to the stimulus is needed in order for the bond to develop Ainsworth and Bell - The Strange Situation Aim to determine the nature of attachment behaviors and types of attachment Procedure Laboratory experiment experiment was set up in a small room with a one way glass Infants were 12 - 18 months old 100 middle class American families Researchers observed the behavior of the infant in 7 three minute long steps 1. Parent and infant alone 2. Stranger joins parent and infant 3. Parent leaves infant and stranger alone 4. Parent returns and stranger leaves 5. Parent leaves; infant left completely alone
6. Stranger returns 7. Parent returns and stranger leaves Four categories of behaviors are measured and observed (1) separation anxiety: the unease the infant shows when left by the caregiver (2) the infants willingness to explore (3) stranger anxiety: the infants response to the presence of a stranger (4) reunion behavior: the way the caregiver was greeted on return Behavior intensity was measured from a scale of 1 - 7 Findings 3 distinct forms of attachment styles, one secure type of attachment and two insecure types Secure Attachment Separation Anxiety Distressed when mother leaves. Resistant Attachment Infant shows signs of intense distress when mother leaves. Infant avoids the stranger shows fear of stranger. Child approaches mother but resists contact, may even push her away. Infant cries more and explores less than the other 2 types. 15 Avoidant Attachment Infant shows no sign of distress when mother leaves. Infant is okay with the stranger and plays normally when stranger is present. Infant shows little interest when mother returns. Mother and stranger are able to comfort infant equally well. 15
Stranger Anxiety
Reunion Behaviour
Other
% of infants
Conclusion Ainsworth and Bell determined that the type of attachment an infant showed depended on the type of care given by the primary caretaker Securely Attached infant are associated with sensitive & responsive primary care develop a positive working model of themselves and have mental representations of others as being helpful while viewing themselves as worthy of respect Insecure Resistant attached infants are associated with inconsistent primary care. Sometimes the childs needs and met and sometime they are ignored by the mother.
5
have negative self image and exaggerate their emotional responses as a way to gain attention Insecure Avoidant infants are associated with unresponsive primary care. The child comes to believe that communication of needs has no influence on the mother. think themselves unworthy and unacceptable, caused by a rejecting primary caregiver
Evaluation Sample Bias (only middle class American families) However, there has been consistent results found across the world e.g. Wartner et. al. found that 78% of children were classified the same way the Strange Situation Paradigm is NOT a general measurement of attachment, but rather a measure of attachment to a maternal figure therefore it lacks validity in terms of generalization to all types of attachment Attachment is dependent on many variables, such as environmental circumstance lab experiment, lacks ecological validity e.g. illness of mother figure may change attachment behavior Breaking ethical guidelines did not protect participants (deliberate mental harm/stress of infants)
Schaffer and Emerson - Stages of Attachment Aim to identify the development of attachment Procedure studies 60 babies at monthly intervals for the first 18 months of their lives longitudinal study all children were studied in their own home carers were interviewed attachment development of the infants was evidenced by the reaction to separation Findings Up to 3 months of age - Indiscriminate attachments. The newborn is predisposed to attach to any human. Most babies respond equally to any caregiver After 4 months - Preference for certain people. Infants they learn to distinguish primary and secondary caregivers but accept care from anyone After 7 months - Special preference for a single attachment figure. The baby looks to particular people for security, comfort and protection. It shows fear of strangers (stranger fear) and unhappiness when separated from a special person (separation anxiety). Some babies show stranger fear and separation anxiety much more frequently and intensely than others, but nevertheless they are seen as evidence that the baby has formed an attachment. This has usually developed by one year of age
After 9 months - Multiple attachments. The baby becomes increasingly independent and forms several attachments Conclusion Attachments were most likely to form with those who responded accurately to the baby's signals, not the person they spent most time with (sensitive responsiveness) Babies had many attachments by 10 months The most important fact in forming attachments is not who feeds and changes the child but who plays and communicates with him or her
Harlow and Zimmerman - Harlows Monkeys Aim a series of experiments investigating attachment in monkeys Procedure and Findings 1. Infant monkeys reared in isolation some died, others were frightened and behaved in an abnormal manner. They could not interact with other monkeys even when they were older. 2. Infant monkeys reared with 2 surrogate mothers First surrogate mother: bare wire mothers Second surrogate mother: wire mothers covered in soft terry toweling cloth The monkeys spent more time with the cloth mother. The infant would only go to the wire mother when hungry. Once fed it would return to the cloth mother for most of the day. If a frightening object was placed in the cage the infant took refuge with the cloth mother The infant would explore more when the cloth mother was present Conclusion Supports Evolutionary Theory of Attachment sensitive response and security is more important than food Harlow concluded that for a monkey to develop normally s/he must have some interaction with an object to which they can cling during the first months of life (critical period) Clinging is a natural response - in times of stress the monkey runs to the object to which it normally clings as if the clinging decreases the stress. Bare wire cannot be clung on, as it is hollow. Harlow found therefore that it was social deprivation rather than maternal deprivation that the young monkeys were suffering from When he brought some other infant monkeys up on their own but with 20 minutes a day in a playroom with three other monkeys he found they grew up to be quite normal emotionally and socially. Evaluation Ethics Humans cannot be represented by monkeys, therefore the findings cannot be completely generalized to humans