Constructivism or social constructivism[26] has been described as a challenge to the dominance of neo-liberal and neo-realist international relations theories.

[ 27] Michael Barnett describes constructivist international relations theories as being concerned with how ideas define international structure, how this structu re defines the interests and identities of states and how states and non-state a ctors reproduce this structure.[28] The key tenet of constructivism is the belie f that "International politics is shaped by persuasive ideas, collective values, culture, and social identities." Constructivism argues that international reali ty is socially constructed by cognitive structures which give meaning to the mat erial world.[29] The theory emerged out of debates concerning the scientific met hod of international relations theories and theories role in the production of i nternational power.[30] Emanuel Adler states that constructivism occupies a midd le ground between rationalist and interpretative theories of international relat ions.[29] The failure of either realism or liberalism to predict the end of the Cold War b oosted the credibility of constructivist theory. Constructivist theory criticise s the static assumptions of traditional international relations theory and empha size that international relations is a social construction. Constructivism is a theory critical of the ontological[31] basis of rationalist theories of internat ional relations. Whereas realism deals mainly with security and material power, and liberalism looks primarily at economic interdependence and domestic-level fa ctors, constructivism most concerns itself with the role of ideas in shaping the international system (indeed it is possible there is some overlap between const ructivism and realism or liberalism, but they remain separate schools of thought ). By "ideas" constructivists refer to the goals, threats, fears, identities, an d other elements of perceived reality that influence states and non-state actors within the international system. Constructivists believe that these ideational factors can often have far-reaching effects, and that they can trump materialist ic power concerns. For example, constructivists note that an increase in the siz e of the US military is likely to be viewed with much greater concern in Cuba, a traditional antagonist of the US, than in Canada, a close US ally. Therefore, t here must be perceptions at work in shaping international outcomes. As such, con structivists do not see anarchy as the invariable foundation of the internationa l system,[32] but rather argue, in the words of Alexander Wendt, that "anarchy i s what states make of it".[33] Constructivists also believe that social norms sh ape and change foreign policy over time rather than security which realists cite .