Scribd Logo
Încărcați

Bine ați venit la Scribd!

  • Motion To Re-Open Case Fraud On The Court v2 Final

    Încărcat de

    Virginia Law
    905 vizualizări37 pagini
    Questions Question: Why didn’t plaintiff go to Supreme Court a second time with an appeal? Because it was obvious that Supreme Court sent a very strong message to the Circuit Court Judges you do not have to follow the rules on two occasions now the Alexandria Circuit Court Judges decided outside there judicial power who would hear Motions that Plaintiff submitted. The Supreme Court then appointed a Judge who had questionable integrity. Who had in the past even though he knew forgery and had been committed by the DMV ruled in favor of the DMV. It has been made clear to Plaintiff the Judicial Network runs all the way up to the Supreme Court of Virginia. Justice Lemons said that Plaintiffs’ appeal had been denied over time. There is no statute of limitation on due process and a judge’s decision that is made when he has no jurisdiction that decision is Void. That the Defendants had been disingenuous in there Motion that the Plaintiff had not filed a Statement of Facts was denied because Plaintiff had proven in Plaintiff’s response that Ilona/David/Gic and their attorneys had been disingenuous with the Supreme Court of Virginia. This proves the Network that the Defendants attorneys are party to, control the outcome of the Supreme Court of Virginia’s approval or denial of an appeal. The Law in Virginia is decided on by the Old Boy Network / Judicial members not the United States Constitution, The Virginia Constitution, the Rules of the Supreme Court. Was this politically motivated? It is known Plaintiff is a Republican and from the articles in Exhibit 12 it is clear how the Democrats wanted to keep hold of Judge Nolan Dawkins appointment. That the Democrat’s want to keep a strong hold on the Judicial System in the State of Virginia. Question: How much has defendants donated to the political campaigns of Randy Sengel, Ed Semonian, Patsy Ticer, David Englin? Patsy Ticer openly helped fund raise and supported Ed Semonian even though she was aware of his illegal, unprofessional acts in his job. (Exhibit 24) Conclusion This is about the 28 East Bellefonte Ave, also about the Collusion through Defendants to have the judicial network prevent Plaintiff from her Religious, United States Constitutional, and Virginia Constitutional & Civil Rights. On several occasions Plaintiff said a mistake was made, let’s fix it. The judicial network in Virginia in its cover up of this mistake and there favoritism to a widow of a past judge party to their judicial network. These men and women, along with Defendants have worked in collusion to Intimidate, Maliciously Manipulate Plaintiff using Scare Tactics, the Alexandria Police, and the Courts of Virginia, motivated by financial interests and cronyism. The judicial network lives in a world of its own in the State of Virginia. The difference is this Network in Virginia is a Gentlemen’s network so people don’t look at it like the Mafia. The truth is they are no different, they hurt people, they protect their own. They believe they are above the law and to be in the Network you agree to protect those in the Network. Due process has no place in the Virginia Judicial Network. The Judicial system of Virginia is corrupt. Chief Justice John Roberts of the Supreme Court of the United States of America testified under oath that “Judges are like umpires. Umpires don’t make the rules, they apply them. The role of an umpire and a judge is critical. They make sure everybody plays by the rules, but it is a limited role. Nobody ever went to a ball game to see the umpire. Judges have to have the humility to recognize that they operate within a system of precedent shaped by other judges equally striving to live up to the judicial oath, and judges have to have the modesty to be open in the decisional process to the considered views of their colleagues on the bench.” Plaintiff is not arguing her case in the Motion. Plaintiff a single mom,

    Titlu original

    Motion to Re-Open Case Fraud on the Court v2 Final

    Drepturi de autor

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Formate disponibile

    DOCX, PDF, TXT sau citiți online pe Scribd

    Vi se pare util acest document?

    Este necorespunzător acest conținut?

    Raportați acest document
    Questions Question: Why didn’t plaintiff go to Supreme Court a second time with an appeal? Because it was obvious that Supreme Court sent a very strong message to the Circuit Court Judges you do not have to follow the rules on two occasions now the Alexandria Circuit Court Judges decided outside there judicial power who would hear Motions that Plaintiff submitted. The Supreme Court then appointed a Judge who had questionable integrity. Who had in the past even though he knew forgery and had been committed by the DMV ruled in favor of the DMV. It has been made clear to Plaintiff the Judicial Network runs all the way up to the Supreme Court of Virginia. Justice Lemons said that Plaintiffs’ appeal had been denied over time. There is no statute of limitation on due process and a judge’s decision that is made when he has no jurisdiction that decision is Void. That the Defendants had been disingenuous in there Motion that the Plaintiff had not filed a Statement of Facts was denied because Plaintiff had proven in Plaintiff’s response that Ilona/David/Gic and their attorneys had been disingenuous with the Supreme Court of Virginia. This proves the Network that the Defendants attorneys are party to, control the outcome of the Supreme Court of Virginia’s approval or denial of an appeal. The Law in Virginia is decided on by the Old Boy Network / Judicial members not the United States Constitution, The Virginia Constitution, the Rules of the Supreme Court. Was this politically motivated? It is known Plaintiff is a Republican and from the articles in Exhibit 12 it is clear how the Democrats wanted to keep hold of Judge Nolan Dawkins appointment. That the Democrat’s want to keep a strong hold on the Judicial System in the State of Virginia. Question: How much has defendants donated to the political campaigns of Randy Sengel, Ed Semonian, Patsy Ticer, David Englin? Patsy Ticer openly helped fund raise and supported Ed Semonian even though she was aware of his illegal, unprofessional acts in his job. (Exhibit 24) Conclusion This is about the 28 East Bellefonte Ave, also about the Collusion through Defendants to have the judicial network prevent Plaintiff from her Religious, United States Constitutional, and Virginia Constitutional & Civil Rights. On several occasions Plaintiff said a mistake was made, let’s fix it. The judicial network in Virginia in its cover up of this mistake and there favoritism to a widow of a past judge party to their judicial network. These men and women, along with Defendants have worked in collusion to Intimidate, Maliciously Manipulate Plaintiff using Scare Tactics, the Alexandria Police, and the Courts of Virginia, motivated by financial interests and cronyism. The judicial network lives in a world of its own in the State of Virginia. The difference is this Network in Virginia is a Gentlemen’s network so people don’t look at it like the Mafia. The truth is they are no different, they hurt people, they protect their own. They believe they are above the law and to be in the Network you agree to protect those in the Network. Due process has no place in the Virginia Judicial Network. The Judicial system of Virginia is corrupt. Chief Justice John Roberts of the Supreme Court of the United States of America testified under oath that “Judges are like umpires. Umpires don’t make the rules, they apply them. The role of an umpire and a judge is critical. They make sure everybody plays by the rules, but it is a limited role. Nobody ever went to a ball game to see the umpire. Judges have to have the humility to recognize that they operate within a system of precedent shaped by other judges equally striving to live up to the judicial oath, and judges have to have the modesty to be open in the decisional process to the considered views of their colleagues on the bench.” Plaintiff is not arguing her case in the Motion. Plaintiff a single mom,

    Drepturi de autor:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Descărcați ca DOCX, PDF, TXT sau citiți online pe Scribd
    Indicator pentru conținut neadecvat
    905 vizualizări37 pagini

    Motion To Re-Open Case Fraud On The Court v2 Final

    Încărcat de

    Virginia Law
    Questions Question: Why didn’t plaintiff go to Supreme Court a second time with an appeal? Because it was obvious that Supreme Court sent a very strong message to the Circuit Court Judges you do not have to follow the rules on two occasions now the Alexandria Circuit Court Judges decided outside there judicial power who would hear Motions that Plaintiff submitted. The Supreme Court then appointed a Judge who had questionable integrity. Who had in the past even though he knew forgery and had been committed by the DMV ruled in favor of the DMV. It has been made clear to Plaintiff the Judicial Network runs all the way up to the Supreme Court of Virginia. Justice Lemons said that Plaintiffs’ appeal had been denied over time. There is no statute of limitation on due process and a judge’s decision that is made when he has no jurisdiction that decision is Void. That the Defendants had been disingenuous in there Motion that the Plaintiff had not filed a Statement of Facts was denied because Plaintiff had proven in Plaintiff’s response that Ilona/David/Gic and their attorneys had been disingenuous with the Supreme Court of Virginia. This proves the Network that the Defendants attorneys are party to, control the outcome of the Supreme Court of Virginia’s approval or denial of an appeal. The Law in Virginia is decided on by the Old Boy Network / Judicial members not the United States Constitution, The Virginia Constitution, the Rules of the Supreme Court. Was this politically motivated? It is known Plaintiff is a Republican and from the articles in Exhibit 12 it is clear how the Democrats wanted to keep hold of Judge Nolan Dawkins appointment. That the Democrat’s want to keep a strong hold on the Judicial System in the State of Virginia. Question: How much has defendants donated to the political campaigns of Randy Sengel, Ed Semonian, Patsy Ticer, David Englin? Patsy Ticer openly helped fund raise and supported Ed Semonian even though she was aware of his illegal, unprofessional acts in his job. (Exhibit 24) Conclusion This is about the 28 East Bellefonte Ave, also about the Collusion through Defendants to have the judicial network prevent Plaintiff from her Religious, United States Constitutional, and Virginia Constitutional & Civil Rights. On several occasions Plaintiff said a mistake was made, let’s fix it. The judicial network in Virginia in its cover up of this mistake and there favoritism to a widow of a past judge party to their judicial network. These men and women, along with Defendants have worked in collusion to Intimidate, Maliciously Manipulate Plaintiff using Scare Tactics, the Alexandria Police, and the Courts of Virginia, motivated by financial interests and cronyism. The judicial network lives in a world of its own in the State of Virginia. The difference is this Network in Virginia is a Gentlemen’s network so people don’t look at it like the Mafia. The truth is they are no different, they hurt people, they protect their own. They believe they are above the law and to be in the Network you agree to protect those in the Network. Due process has no place in the Virginia Judicial Network. The Judicial system of Virginia is corrupt. Chief Justice John Roberts of the Supreme Court of the United States of America testified under oath that “Judges are like umpires. Umpires don’t make the rules, they apply them. The role of an umpire and a judge is critical. They make sure everybody plays by the rules, but it is a limited role. Nobody ever went to a ball game to see the umpire. Judges have to have the humility to recognize that they operate within a system of precedent shaped by other judges equally striving to live up to the judicial oath, and judges have to have the modesty to be open in the decisional process to the considered views of their colleagues on the bench.” Plaintiff is not arguing her case in the Motion. Plaintiff a single mom,

    Drepturi de autor:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Descărcați ca DOCX, PDF, TXT sau citiți online pe Scribd
    Indicator pentru conținut neadecvat
    din 37

    1 2 3

    VIRGINIA: THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ALEXANDRIA

    JANICE WOLK GRENADIER,


    4

    Plaintiff,
    5

    vs.
    6

    ILONA ELY FREEDMAN GRENADIER


    7

    HECKMAN
    8

    ) Case No.: CH010654 ) ) MOTION TO RE-OPEN CASE - FRAUD ) ON THE COURT BY - DEFENDANTS ) CHANGE OF VENUE ) TRIAL BY JURY ) ADDITIONAL DEFENDANT ) ) )

    AND
    9

    GRENADIER INVESTMENT CO. LTD,


    10

    AND
    11

    GRENADIER, ANDERSON, STARACE,


    12

    DUFFETT, & KEISLER, P.C.


    13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

    AND DAVID MARK GRENADIER Defendant MOTION TO RE-OPEN CASE DUE TO - FRAUD ON THE COURT BY DEFENDANTS CHANGE OF VENUE TRIAL BY JURY ADDITIONAL DEFENDANT
    Comes now Plaintiff prays this court to conduct serious consideration of the actions it has taken against this Plaintiff in regards to the legally binding Oath's of Office to which our Commonwealth of Virginia requires of each government employee such as; Judge to the Supreme Court of Virginia, Defendant's Attorneys, Commonwealth Attorney, Clerk of Court, Elected Legislature's, Virginia State Bar, JIRC and other employees who are employed under such Oaths, and hereby consider evidence that supports the request to correct the intentional, willful, wanton, and malicious actions they conducted. This Plaintiff hereby presents significant evidence based testimony exposing systemic collusion that protected the Ilona (a wife of a past judge participant in the old boy network), and Son David. The Defendants' blatant abusive regard to the United States of America Constitution, Virginia Constitution, Civil, Political and Religious Rights of Plaintiff, should be punished. Plaintiff has the evidence that Defendants and Defendants law Firm have been disingenuous with this court (Fraud on the Court) and with Plaintiff. They have been disingenuous with
    1 | The Appearance of Justice is as important as Justice itself

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

    Plaintiff since the purchase of 28 East Bellefonte Ave with a Contract date of August 1986. That Ilona Ely Freedman Grenadier Heckman was involved in a Forged Document to make her Trustee to the Sonia Grenadier Trust, with the intention of stealing any and all if possible from the Trust through her law Firm. That Defendant Ilona purchased a property from the Trust of Sonia Grenadier making payments to 1st Albert Grenadier then David Grenadier. Not to Sonia Grenadier as Note called for. That Defendant David & Ilona used malicious manipulation to steal from Plaintiff and Sonia Grenadier and her family. That Defendant David and Janice married in September of 1988, David and girlfriend Mary started a relationship in the fall of 1997, and David moved out of home in February 1998, that he was using Bellefonte rents to date his girlfriend Mary, and to purchase all new furniture for his new home. That Defendants in collusion lied to Plaintiff about not settling on 28 E. Bellefonte if she did not become a partner to the property. That Defendants did this as they were aware of Plaintiff receiving a settlement check of $30,000. in October of 1986. That Defendants any time they saw Plaintiff receiving any funds would steal, manipulate them from her. Plaintiff will show a pattern of lies and manipulation. That Defendants had their share to put down on the property and again mislead Plaintiff into lending them $3,600.00 towards there purchase. That Plaintiff filed for Bankruptcy to prevent 28 E. Bellefonte from being foreclosed on by Burke and Herbert Bank because Defendants used Rent for other purposes then paying the bills of Bellefonte Ave. ( David dating girlfriend Mary Drake) The loan was higher so Ilona/GIC/David could purchase property called Southway Terrace. Plaintiff sold property as a realtor called Southway Terrace to Defendants, at time Defendants had an offer for $100,000. to flip the contracts. They refused offer. They did an inspection of property that they purchased for $2,982,000. With an appraised value of $3,200.000, with a positive cash flow at time of purchase, walking away from settlement with cash, putting no cash out of pocket to purchase, financed 100%. The property tax value in 2007 was $8,537,200. The rents at the time of purchase covered expenses. In May of 2008 they had no vacancies a waiting list with the Townhomes renting for $1,000. a month, the 2 Bdrs @ $850.00, the 1bdr (small) @ $725.00, (med) @ $750.00 and (large) @ $775.00. Ilona mislead court and Judges on such property. Ilona in letter dated February 8, 2008 (Exhibit 2) 2nd page says look at settlement sheet as if she had sold property? Property still shows in Tax records as theirs, one more of Ilonas intentional misleading lies. That Defendants mislead the Court that Plaintiff had scammed them in the purchase and they should have a right to her commission, through the loan of the refinance of 28 East Bellefonte to
    2 | The Appearance of Justice is as important as Justice itself

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

    help them purchase the property known as Southway Terrace. That Plaintiff should not receive back the money leant to them to help purchase Southway Terrace. Plaintiff had to bring together several sellers and negotiated each contract. Plaintiff can show the deception in court by Defendants. That Defendant Ilona lawyer / officer of the court lied to and in this court about being served in September of 2007. That Defendants Ilona lawyer / officer of the court lied in Admissions. That Defendant Ilona lawyer / officer of the court lied in Counterclaim and Cross-Complaint claiming ownership of 75%. In support that Ilona lawyer / officer of the court knew and had the information of ownership of 50% per paperwork filed with the Bankruptcy Courts in 2001. That Defendants did not pay upkeep and took rent from the property and did not pay the bills of the property with the rent. That Defendants Ilona lawyer / officer of the court lied and mislead the Bankruptcy Courts and lawyers to defraud the funds that were to go to Plaintiff. That Plaintiff would not have been in Bankruptcy if Defendants had not misused rents from Bellefonte Ave and had not mislead and maliciously manipulated Plaintiff in helping them by assigning a commission which Ilona as lawyer to Wolk & Associates/ Janice then Broker negotiated to keep herself, and her law firm from being held accountable for the money they stole from the Sonia Grenadier Trust out of her Law firm. Ilona insisted on holding all documents for Plaintiff and Wolk & Associates to keep them safe (quote from Ilona) which she and her law firm now refuses to turn over to Plaintiff. Ilona through her law firm on her law firm letter head negotiated with all the attorneys. Ilona lied to all parties involved, about how much money she and her law firm had stolen. Ilona a lawyer and officer of the court lied about who had stolen the money and that she did it for personal gain. That Ilona didnt ask for the Commission assignment till the early morning of July 7, 1990. Janice had been in labor with Abigail for 2 days to end up with an emergency C-section at 4.45 pm on July 6, 1990. (Exhibit 2) Abigail spent her first nights in ICU due to a heart issue. Instead of calling the morning of July 7 to see how Abigail or Janice was, Ilona called for the assignment of her $30,000. Commission, Ilona at that time insisted there would be a note and the terms of the note would be 10% interest and due in 30 years. Ilona reminded Janice that if she didnt assign the commission David would go to jail and be raped by the inmates. Knowing Janice had not finished college because her apartment had been broken into and she had been raped. The man went to jail for 6 years for the crime. Ilona used this line several times to control Plaintiff, along with how would Plaintiff like taking her girls to see their father in jail. Wolk & Associates due to the actions of Ilona lost the client and other clients because of the appearance of the involvement of Janice, and the appearance of the client going through Jim Arthur instead of Jancie / Wolk & Associates.

    3 | The Appearance of Justice is as important as Justice itself

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

    Ilona in the Spring of 2008 admitted to these actions. That she had lied about what had taken place. Ilona sent Janice a threatening letter on February 8, 2008 (Exhibit 2) to drop suit or else, on third page of letter Ilona recalled a situation where someone had accused David of sleeping with his sister. That Janice was passing it around town. It was a set up - David pulled a loaded gun on Janice, but, Janice called a friend before he could do anything with it. Janice believes now she was set up also on the way to the airport, that David called yelling at her. The cab driver demanded she hang up the phone or he would pull over and take phone from Janice. The cab driver then told Janice for $5,000.00 he could take care of the issue. Janice declined and the cab driver said you dont have the $5,000.00 dont worry. Call me, it will be taken care of. Plaintiff threw his number away, Plaintiff believes she was being set up by Ilona & David. Ilona in the Spring of 2008 admitted she had nothing to do with Plaintiff and her children because she raised them Catholic. Which could be why Defendant felt she could lie, maliciously manipulate Plaintiff as Ilona is Jewish, by appearance hates Catholics and believes this gives her more rights? An e-mail on July 6, 2009 that started with Ilonas attorney Ben DiMuro and Robin/Rachel with ignorant threats calls the Pope a Wanker and Plaintiff a bigot and says horrid things about Plaintiff as a mother and about Plaintiffs daughters (Exhibit 27) That Ilona recently accused King David of burring strangers in her Garden, but in truth Ilona stole Herman Grenadier and had his body moved, to a garden she alleges she paid for, but wont produce the checks she claims she has. Ilona then donated/stole Herman & Sonias garden and took a tax deduction that did not belong to her. Ilona knowingly filed a false complaint against King David with the State of Virginia.(Exhibit 2) Plaintiff as of May 13, 2012 sent a letter to Ilona and her law firm that there services were no longer needed and requested her files back. Per the Virginia State Bar Rules. Ilona and her law firm have refused to return Plaintiffs files. That Defendants Ilona lawyer/officer of the court have used Bribery with the Judges, Public Officials, Elected Public Officials, lawyers, VSB, JIRC and other government officials to not be held accountable for their criminal actions. That Defendants through their attorney Ben DiMuro with the help of good friend Commonwealth Attorney Randy Sengel tried to have Janice charged with Extortion for going after money and the interest stolen from her.(Details further down and in Exhibits) The Defendants and lawyers have used their Friendships and Bribery to manipulate the Courts, VSB, JIRC. That Defendant Ilona lawyer/officer of the court was the wife of the late Judge Albert Grenadier and David was the son of the late Judge Albert Grenadier. Sonia & Herman Grenadier were the grand parents to David and parents to Albert.
    4 | The Appearance of Justice is as important as Justice itself

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

    That Defendants Ilona lawyer / officer of the court have lied, their actions have been malicious to manipulate Plaintiff, and steal from her, from Herman & Sonia Grenadier and their Children, Grand Children and Great Grand Children. It has been proven that all the Judges in this case were illegally chosen per the rules of the Supreme Court of Virginia. Fraud on the Court by all Judges involved in this case to date. That Defendant Ilona would brag about her friendships, free legal advice to the Judges, which will be proven with her party list from 1986, pictures, news articles, donations to Judges portraits, parties and by the actions of the Judges. That Defendants Ilona lawyer / officer of the court relationship with Judge Haddock is very questionable. That in May of 2007 when Plaintiff went into Judges chambers she found Defendant Ilona in Judge Haddocks arms. When Plaintiff turned and introduced herself to Judge Haddock he informed Plaintiff You will never get a fair trial WE LOVE ILONA. Judge Haddock knowing Plaintiff was going to go in front of Grand Jury October 11, 2011 to present evidence against Ilona informed Plaintiff I was going to let you in front of the Grand Jury but, I am not know as I believe you are going to talk about me In the November of 2011 OYEZ you will find a Big Thank you to Ilonas law firm & Ben DiMuros law firm for their generous donation towards his Portrait. Judge Haddock went on to demand Plaintiff back on December 12, 2012, at 9am. It is questionable that the paper work was appropriately filed with the Supreme Court. That Plaintiff was delayed from the date of December 12, 2012, and then illegally denied by Kangaroo Court on February 13, 2012. That Plaintiffs complaints to The JIRC Donald Curry who took Judge Kents place as attorney for the JIRC Judge Kent and Ilona are good friends. Patsy Ticer had Judge Kents x-wife tell Plaintiff she needed to walk away she couldnt win this Plaintiff just like her and her family could never get a fair trial Plaintiff was no longer one of them No longer had any rights in Virginia, she needed to move on with her life. That Plaintiffs complaints to the Virginia State Bar were ignored due to Defendant Ilona and her lawyers relationship with the Virginia State Bar. ( Exhibits 20, 21, 22, 23) That the Courts of Justice, Plaintiffs Legislators have also ignored this due to the Power of the Old Boys Network. (Exhibit 24, 25, 26, 34,36 ) That the Supreme Court of Virginia has made rulings on Friendships and the Power of the Old Boy Network against Plaintiff (Exhibit 34) That Defendant Ilona and her law firm till May 13, 2012 had a fiduciary responsibility to Plaintiff for the commission that was maliciously manipulated from Plaintiff to keep Ilona and her law firm from being investigated and found guilty from stealing through her law firm from the Sonia Grenadier Trust that she had been involved with the forgery of Sonia Grenadiers name to give her and her law firm Trustee powers.

    5 | The Appearance of Justice is as important as Justice itself

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

    That Defendant Ilona and her law firm, now have Defendant David working out of there law firm under Mt. Vernon Bookkeeping. (Exhibit 2) Crimes committed by defendants and others: Breach of Contract, Anticipatory Breach, Deceit, Concealment, Constructive Fraud, Conversion, Negligence, Duty to Plaintiff, Proximate Cause, Contributory Negligence, Intervening Negligence, Breach of Fiduciary Duty, Violation of Ethical Standards, Infliction of Emotional Distress, Overt False Representation, Due Process, Conspiracy, Collusion, 8.01-428 Fraud on the Court, Miscarriage of Justice, Appearance of Justice, Conflict of Interest, Treason, Retaliatory Actions, Retribution, Bribery, Torts, Title 18 US Code 241 & 242 Title 42 US Code 1983. Untied States Constitution, Virginia Constitution, Civil Rights, Religious Rights, Political Rights,

    The following defined in Exhibit 1


    Plaintiff has added the definition of the laws ignored by Defendants and others in the original case.In conclusion the Defendants and there lawyers either did not know the law incompetence, or, they have ignored the law unconscionable! As quoted by Judge John Kloch on his second recusal Appearance of Justice is just as important as Justice itself 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) 7) 8) 9) 10) 11) 12) 13) 14) 15) 16) 17) 18) 19) 20) 21) 22) 23) 24) 25) 26) 27) 28) 29) 30) 31) 32) 33) 34) DUE PROCESS Supreme Court Rule 17.1-105(B) Oath of Office Attorneys & Judges Conspiracy Collusion Fraud on the Court Miscarriage of Justice Appearance of Justice Kangaroo Court Conflicts of Interest - related to the Practice of Law Conflict of Interest Recusal Code of Ethics Government Liability Government Liability Judicial Immunity Treason The Old Boys Network United States Constitution Virginia Constitution Civil Rights Breach of Fiduciary Duties Justice Delayed is Justice Denied Under the color of the law Title 18 United States Code 241 Title 18 United States code 242 Code of Virginia 19.2-191(2) Title 42 U.S. code 1983 Sovereign Immunity The Federal Torts Claims Act or FTCA Retaliatory Actions Retribution Bribery Treason

    6 | The Appearance of Justice is as important as Justice itself

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

    35) Judges as Criminals 36) VSB Duties of an Officer of the Court 37) Cannons of Judicial Conduct for the State of Virginia

    PARTIES
    Plaintiff - Janice Wolk Grenadier Has had her and her daughters Religious, United States Constitutional, Virginia Constitutional & Civil Rights violated in several different formats for the last 26 years - Through the collusion of the other Parties listed here and, including Ilona, David, Grenadier, Anderson, Starace, Duffett & Kieser law firm in Virginia Defendants. Plaintiff has been maliciously manipulated using Plaintiffs children as the pawn to have the Network protect the Evil perpetrators Ilona & David from being held culpable for their crimes. Plaintiffs original and this suit states 50% Owner of 28 East Bellefonte Avenue, Alexandria of which the other 50% is owned by Grenadier Investment Co. Ltd. (GIC). She is divorced from David Mark Grenadier. Plaintiff is owed with interest from the original suit and the Note over One Million dollars ($1,000,000.) Plaintiff is also asking for punitive damages, due to the malpractice of Ilona and her law firm, and the malicious manipulation. David Grenadier - Defendant now and in original suit September of 2007, represented by Michael Weiser Esq was a 49% owner of GIC. He is the stepson of Ilona Ely Freedman Grenadier Heckman and the son of the late Judge Albert Grenadier of the Circuit Court of Alexandria. Lied in court with Judge McGrath, maliciously manipulated Plaintiff to steal from her. Is now employed by Ilonas law firm or Mt. Vernon Bookkeeping in the same offices as Ilonas law firm. 649 S. Washington Street, Alexandria, VA, 22314 and uses the same main phone number of the law firm 703-683-9000 according to Manta. Ilona Ely Freedman Grenadier Heckman Defendant now and in original suit of September of 2007 was a 51% owner of GIC (Plaintiff does not know if this has changed). She is a licensed attorney in Virginia founding law partner of Grenadier, Anderson, Starace, Duffett & Kieser - Ilona & other lawyers in her law firm represented her till Ben DiMuro of DiMuroGinsberg took over as legal counsel for Ilona & her law firm in April 17, 2009. Ilona was the wife of the late Judge Albert Grenadier, then married his first cousin whom he hated and called a weasel Jerome Heckman, Ilona likes telling people Sonia put them together, and it is Jewish tradition to marry a family member? Ilona and her law firm were involved in the mismanagement of the Sonia Grenadier Trust. Ilona was involved in the forgery of Sonia Grenadier on an Addendum to the trust making her Trustee, by all appearance the illegal donation of Herman & Sonia Grenadiers Garden at King David. She had been put on notice by Jim Arthur that the Trust agreement Addendum was forged. Stealing / Moving Herman Grenadier without appropriate permission, being disingenuous with the state, filing a complaint against King David Cemetery for burring strangers in her garden. Waiting over 3 years to send letter and inform her niece and nephew that they would need to remover there mother Ruth, Alberts sister from being buried with her Brother, Mother & Father (Sonia & Herman) because Ilona had not given permission (which there is signed documentation that she did) and now Ilona calls or considers Ruth, a stranger. Ilona has charged Ruth for legal services and had a Fiduciary responsibility to her. It has been proven thru documents that Ilona did sign permission for Ruth to be buried in the Garden. Ilona refuses to provide the canceled checks used to purchase the garden or the permission she was given to move Herman, and which accounts the funds came out of. Ilonas actions have been willful acts that were malicious, violent, oppressive, fraudulent, wanton, and grossly reckless. Plaintiff is owed with interest from a note that has a value of over $ 500,000. Refusing to turn over the Note or the money, which Ilona acting as JWGs attorney negotiated an assignment agreement for the commission and a note for repayment. In return Ilona benefited with her lies to everyone, greatly with herself and her law firm not being tarnished or being exposed at the time to their true involvement in the theft of the funds. Ilona it will be shown through donations to campaigns, purchasing of tables, throwing parties has rewarded/bribed several of the Judges, lawyers, VSB, JIRC, Elected officials, etc for their illegal & unprofessional behavior to protect her, her husband Jerry Heckman and her law firm from being held responsible for their illegal & unprofessional behavior.

    7 | The Appearance of Justice is as important as Justice itself

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17

    Ruth for several years manipulated by Ilona believed her, while Ilona was stealing from her and her family. Ruth was ill several years before she died, and most likely not 100% to be making the decisions that she was. Ilona took advantage of her, and her situation. Ilona & her law firm are guilty of Bribery of officials, Theft of Herman Grenadier, Involvement in the forgery to give her and her law firm access to the Sonia Grenadier Trust to loot the Trust, malicious manipulation with lies, malicious manipulation of Janice with lies to assign a commission to protect Ilona & her law firm. With holding Janices files and Note that Ilona negotiated. Fraud on the Court, perjury in documents, perjury in court to Judges, perjury in Admissions, perjury in Counterclaim and CrossComplaint, bribery, using friendships to block Janice from due process. Filing false complaints with the State of Virginia against King David claiming strangers had been allowed to be buried in her so claimed Garden that she wont show how it was paid for. Exhibit 2 Grenadier Investment Co. Ltd (GIC) Defendant now and in original suit of September of 2007 a Real Estate Investment Co. owned 51% by Ilona Grenadier Heckman and 49% by David Grenadier. The partnership was severed, and Plaintiff is not sure of todays ownership of GIC. With a value of Real Estate to date of over 10 million dollars. Exhibit 3 JUDGE ALBERT GRENADIER Circuit Court Judge in The City of Alexandria, father to David Grenadier, husband of Ilona Grenadier, son of Herman & Sonia Grenadier - Died March 1985. First cousin to Jerome Heckman who he referred to as a weasel, from Sonia to other cousins it has been said he hated Jerry. JEROME (Jerry) HECKMAN of Keller Heckman Founding Partner to Keller Heckman LP in st Washington DC, 1 Cousin to the late Judge Albert Grenadier married December of 1985 to Ilona. Blood Relative to Plaintiffs daughters. His mother Pauline was sister to Sonia whom he has benefitted from the theft of the funds that were stolen from Sonia and Maliciously Manipulated from Plaintiff. Part owner of the Monroe Ave Partnership that funds from the Sonia Trust went into. SONIA GRENADIER - Mother to the late Albert Grenadier, Grandmother to David Grenadier, Great Grandmother to Plaintiffs girls, Aunt to Jerry Heckman. Victim to Ilona & her Law Firm - Malicious Manipulation, Involvement in Forgery on a Trust Addendum, Stealing of Trust Funds. Victim to Jerry Heckman and David. Exhibit 4 JUDGE LISA KEMLER Silent Exhibit 6

    18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

    JUDGE JOHN KLOCH Recused himself twice, Letter of apology and acknowledgement: Appearance of Justice is just as important as Justice itself Exhibit 5

    Chief Judge DONALD M. HADDOCK On or about May 7, 2008 Plaintiff went to Judges chambers, when she walked in Ilona was in Judge Haddocks arms. Plaintiff when Ilona left turned to Judge Haddock to introduce herself to him. He then in formed her she could not get a fair trial as they all Loved Ilona and that is why they were bringing in other Judges. He did this and said this in front of Diane Friske, Court Administrator. Has committed Fraud upon the Court, Violated his oath of office, You will never get a Fair trial we LOVE Ilona The appearance of impropriety to this situation is an understatement of his ethics which are deemed questionable. To a pro se litigant, without knowledge of the specific facts, the comment and action in question appears inappropriate and was a violation of rules and regulation. By all appearances had recused himself and did not file the appropriate paper work with the Supreme Court. Treason of the law. By appearance in this situation and others that will come out at a later day only follows the law when convenient to him. Used and believes in nepotism according to an article to help his son become a Judge in the City of Alexandria.

    8 | The Appearance of Justice is as important as Justice itself

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

    Ive been asked to say a few words about nepotism, Haddock cracked at his sons installation ceremony. Im in favor of it. Quote from the Connection newspaper Thursday March 10, 2011

    Denied Plaintiff right to go in front of the Grand Jury on October 13, 2011. Informed Plaintiff I was going to let you go into the Grand Jury but, I have decided not to because I believe you are going to talk about ME. I demand you back on December 12, 2012 to go in front of the Grand Jury which was delayed and denied on February 13, 2012. Demanded this to give himself and the other Judges the chance to recuse themselves, which they did. They then did not go through the appropriate channels to have Judge Richard Bowen Potter chosen. It is a known fact Judge Potter is under investigation for his corrupt behavior in protecting other government employees in the DMV. Retired on December 31, 2011, Ilona & Ben DiMuro generous contributors to his Portrait fund. Which by appearance could be said contributed to the collusion of not allowing Plaintiff in front of Grand Jury on October 13, 2011. Ilona has thrown a Thank you party on the Miss Mallory on September 15, 2011 by all appearance a $100,000. + party. Exhibit 7 DIANE FISKE- Circuit Court of the City of Alexandria Administrator Informed Plaintiff the complete opposite of Virginia Code 17.1-105 (b) by the Circuit Court of Alexandria - That the only way The Chief Justice choose a Judge was if they "the Circuit Court " couldn't find a Judge. Plaintiff had asked on several occasions about the process of choosing a Judge. Each time Plaintiff was told the exact opposite of the law. Confirmed several times all Judges had recused themselves: Judge Haddock, Judge Kemler, Judge Kloch, Judge Dawkins. Donated a lovely mirror to the Grenadier Law Library in support of the collusion. Exhibit 8

    JUDGE THOMAS FORTKORT On December 5, 2007 heard Motion for Default against Ilona/David/GIC this motion was scheduled to be heard in October of 2007. He should have known the rules of the Supreme Court and realized when he was asked to hear the case that it should have been through the Supreme Court - Not the City of Alexandria Judges. In collusion with the City of Alexandria Judges Denied Plaintiffs Motion for Default -Said it was ok that Ilona a lawyer and LOVE of Chief Judge Donald M Haddock to have lied in Court to Judge Kloch. A motion that should take 7 days to be heard took 75 days to be heard by a judge chosen without jurisdiction. Justice delayed is Justice denied Exhibit 9 JUDGE J. HOWE BROWN On three (3) occasions was asked by the Circuit Court of Alexandria to oversee a case that the Judges of the Circuit Court had recused themselves. The Circuit Court of Alexandria had not followed the rules of The Supreme Court of Virginia Rule 17.1-105(b) This was in violation of Plaintiffs Civil Rights, Constitutional Rights, The rules of the Supreme Court of Virginia, Virginia Code. As a Judge he has the responsibility of knowing the law. In conclusion he either did not know the law incompetence, or, he ignored the law unconscionable! According to Ilona Judge Brown a good friend called Ilona all the time for free legal advice, allowed her to lie in Documents filed with the Courts in her Counter Claim, allowed Ilona to Lie in Admissions, allowed Ilona to not have to answer questions in regard to her stealing Money from the Sonia Grenadier trust. Denied Plaintiffs request for a Trial by Jury after Chief Judge Donald M. Haddock had informed Plaintiff that Plaintiff would not get a fair trial because they LOVED Ilona. Exhibit 10 JUDGE JAMES MCGRATH On September 11, 2008 Kangaroo Court the outcome had been pre decided prior to the case and facts being heard. Asked by the Circuit Court of Alexandria to oversee a
    9 | The Appearance of Justice is as important as Justice itself

    1 2 3 4 5 6

    case that the Judges of the Circuit Court had recused themselves. The Circuit Court of Alexandria had not followed the rules of The Supreme Court of Virginia Rule 17.1-105(b) This was in violation of Plaintiffs Civil Rights, Constitutional Rights, and The rules of the Supreme Court of Virginia were ignored, which as a Judge he had the responsibility of knowing. In conclusion he either did not know the law incompetence, or, he ignored the law unconscionable! On August 12, 2010 Judge Kloch recuse himself because of the same relationship that Judge McGrath & Judge Kloch shared at the time of Plaintiffs trial. With the acknowledgement: Appearance of Justice is just as important as Justice itself In conclusion to protect their fellow old boy network. Judge McGrath: Cannons of the Judges

    7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

    1. Allowed Family, social or other relationships to influence this judgment 2. Engaged in private conversations which to influence his judicial actions 3. Failing to disqualify in a proceeding in which impartiality reasonably might be questioned, because of his Actions under 1 & 2 Exhibit 11 JUDGE NOLAN DAWKINS Lied in Court on October 13, 2010 & by all appearances had recused himself and not filed the appropriate paper work with the Supreme Court. He told Plaintiff in Court that he was not a Judge at the time the case was heard. Documents show he was appointed April of 2008 and sworn in June of 2008. Exhibit 12 JUDGE JAMES CLARK Refused to hear Motion for Sanctions against Randy Sengel and informed Plaintiff he had not Recused himself. Refused to hear Motion for Questions to be answered by Edward Semonian Clerk of Court again said he had not recused himself that it was not on his Docket, yet heard other Motions that were not on his Docket. Exhibit 13

    JUDGE RICHARD BOWEN POTTER ~ appointed by The Supreme Court Chief Justice Cynyhia D. Kinser to make sure the Law was followed. Was just as disingenuous as all the other Judges - appointed Randy Sengel The Gate Keeper / GOD of the Grand Jury - Kidnapping Plaintiff in Court Room 4 to keep others from watching the Kangaroo Court that was approved with the Collusion of all these judges, and government officials including as mentioned in court Federal Judge Gerald Bruce Lee and by all appearance Chief Justice Cynthia Kinser. It was very clear from the letter sent to Judge Potter from the Chief Justice of his duties which a copy was sent to The Circuit Court of Alexandria. That the Grand Jury was dismissed before final arguments of the shame of the Kangaroo court held in Court Room 4, along with Judge Potter asking for direction from Commonwealth Attorney Randy Sengel prior to making a ruling on Plaintiff being allowed in an appeal to do a written statement of Facts is disingenuous and Judge Potter with his collusion with the Commonwealths attorney loses judicial immunity and jurisdiction. Question: Why should orders from the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court be taken seriously? She and the other members have sent a strong message you don't have to follow the rules of the Supreme Court of Virginia Code if you are in The Network. The State of Virginias Legal System is a disgrace - The City of Alexandria has sent a strong message back to the Chief Justice you are a Joke -Your orders will not be followed by us - We are above you and the Law Exhibit 14 FEDERAL JUDGE GERALD BRUCE LEE - Order that was done on the 13 of January 2012 and th mailed on the 18 of January 2012. In which Plaintiff is called delusional, malicious & looking for
    10 | The Appearance of Justice is as important as Justice itself
    th

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

    frivolous law suits being fantastic and fanciful nature. But, Judge Gerald Bruce Lee has met all the other Judges, Government employees used his staff to lie to Plaintiff and mislead Plaintiff in information about the Federal court rules. By all appearance has conflict of interest in all parts of Plaintiffs case and should have recused himself. Because of this Gerald Bruce Lee has lost judicial immunity. Conflict of interest and his being part of the Network can be easily proven Judge Lee was an active member of the Virginia State Bar. He was an elected member of the Virginia State Bar Council, Chairman of the General Practice of Law Section, President of the Northern Virginia Black Attorneys Association, and Chairman of the Judicial Selection Committee of the Alexandria Bar Association. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Judge Lee breached his oath of office, has taken personal, professional relationships into consideration before his oath, the Law and Plaintiffs Civil & United States Constitutional Rights. Used personnel support staff to be disingenuous in several issues to protect him. Exhibit 15 JURIDICIAL SOLUTIONS Employer of Judge McGrath at time of Trial. RANDY SENGEL COMMONWEALTH ATTORNEY OF THE CITY OF ALEXANDRIA 1. Unprofessional & Disingenuous 2. Has made himself the Gate Keeper God to the Grand Jury 3. Ignoring the Crimes of the Judges 4. Ignoring the Crimes of the Clerk of Court 5. Using scare tactics and the police to show off his power After Ben Dimuro on April 17, 2009 put Extortion in the ear of everyone - Detective Pak shows up and interviews Plaintiff for over an hour, Plaintiff request that it be taped, yet there is no record of this in the Police Department, no incident number, no case number Detective Pak informed Plaintiff he did it under the direction of Commonwealth Attorney Randy Sengel. Plaintiff had days before sent Randy Sengel questions about the legality of the Judges choosing each other to hear Plaintiffs case. This starts a pattern for Commonwealth Attorney Randy Sengel protecting the Old Boy Network and trying to use Scare Tactics on Plaintiff. 6. Ignoring the crimes of Ilona Ely Freedman Grenadier Heckman of Stealing, Lying in court, Filing false documents in the courts, involved with the stealing of over $95,000. In the Sonia Grenadier Trust, with holding a note of Plaintiffs, that her hate for Plaintiff and her girls is that they are Catholic and Ilona is Jewish 7. Using his power to intimidate Plaintiff a single mom with two girls. Collusion with the city attorney threatening to sue her on the same day he sent letter to Judge Potter. 8. Suggesting JW takes her complaints to the Magistrate in Kangaroo Court where Plaintiff was kidnapped and held there till the Grand Jury had been dismissed. Question: What is Randy Sengel, The Old Boy Network and his friends so afraid of - The TRUTH of their Collusion against Plaintiff to prevent Justice 9. In collusion with the City of Alexandria Police to prevent Plaintiff from getting a police report to take case to the Magistrate. Exhibit 16 EDWARD SEMONIAN COMMONWEALTH CLERK OF COURT OF THE CITY OF ALEXANDRIA Ed Semonian paid $128,000. a year to not do his job - September of 2007 when all the Judge's recused themselves it was Mr. Semonian's job to file the appropriate paper work with the Supreme Court - It was
    11 | The Appearance of Justice is as important as Justice itself

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

    his job on February 13, 2012 to make sure Plaintiffs file was in order - Ed Semonian did not do his job. But with the support of The Network was reelected in November of 2011 for another 8 years. Ed Semonain again did not followed the law with Plaintiffs recent motions as Judge James Clark on both occasions said he had not recused himself from hearing Plaintiffs Motions which means again the Judges (Lisa Kemler, Nolan Dawkins, James Clark, Richard Potter) / Ed Semonian took the law into his own hands and had Judge Potter listen to the Motions Dated January 18, 2012 & February 1, 2012. Judge Potter and Randy Sengel kidnaped Plaintiff and her witness in another Court Room holding Kangaroo court, with the support and knowledge of the Clerk of Court Ed Semonian. Exhibit 17 MEGAN S. ROBERTS THE CITY OF ALEXANDRIA ATTORNEY January 4, 2012 same day Randy Sengel sends his letter to Judge Bowen Potter that Plaintiff is not one of his witnesss and that Plaintiff should not be allowed in front of the Grand Jury. Office of The City Attorney Megan S. Roberts sends letter regarding $ 200. Ms. Robertss plans to sue Plaintiff for $200.00. Plaintiff returns a letter explaining to Ms. Roberts that Plaintiff had no intention of paying the $200. And in return Plaintiff receives bills for $200. + $700. Plaintiff has now received several of these bills. It is Plaintiffs believe that Megan Roberts & Randy Sengel conspired trying to scare Plaintiff and pressure her to realize he has the power of The Network behind him. To date Plaintiff is still getting bills, even after suit was filed. May 17, 2012 Plaintiff receives in the mail a letter and Warrant in Debt with a June 20, 2012 court date. On May 16, 2012 Plaintiff delivered to Megan S. Roberts her intention of Suit., to all who have in collusion worked together to prevent and harass Plaintiff using scare tactics. Plaintiff has filed a Counterclaim Cross Complaint for damages of $100,000. Exhibit 18

    JAMES L. BANKS SR. Supports Randy Sengels Bad behavior and the letter sent to Plaintiff the same day that Randy Sengel sent a letter to Judge Potter saying Plaintiff shouldnt be allowed to go in front of the Grand Jury on February 13, 2012 Plaintiff went to discuss the unprofessional, illegal, hate, disingenuous behavior of officials in the City of Alexandria - he expressed his support of these individuals and there actions. CITY OF ALEXANDRIA POLICE refused Plaintiff a police report # to go in front of the Magistrate. Does not have a record, or incident number for the charges of Extortion that were investigated, as they were investigated as a favor to Randy Sengel. DONALD CURRY Head attorney for JIRC new counsel to the JIRC By Virginia Lawyers Weekly Home > News In Brief > Curry tapped as

    Curry tapped as new counsel to the JIRC Published: September 25, 2000

    Senior Assistant Attorney General Donald R. Curry has been appointed as Counsel for the Judicial Inquiry and Review Commission, effective Nov. 1. He will succeed the retiring JIRC counsel, former Judge Donald H. Kent. Curry has been with the Virginia Attorney General's office for 18 years. He was assistant attorney general from 1982 to 1986, and senior ... Martha Kent the x-wife and very, very good friend of Ilona Grenadiers was who informed me for Patsy Ticer I was no longer one of them and I needed to move on as I could not win. I no longer had any rights in Virginia. Receives complaint one day and returns a letter the next saying no reason to investigate. Informed Plaintiff not to bother with complaint he was good friends with Judge James McGrath. And through

    12 | The Appearance of Justice is as important as Justice itself

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

    collusion and friendships with the Legislature he has made it clear no complaints against these Judges will be heard. Exhibit 19 VIRGINIA STATE BAR (VSB) The Supreme Court of Virginia approved IOLTA acronym for Interest on Lawyers Trust Accounts in 1993. The Attorneys involved in this collusion are high powered; most likely the interest received to support the VSB is a good amount of funding of there every day expenses. Ben DiMuro past Presidents generous donation from him and his wife of 10% of their estate. Ilona and her law firms generous contributions for tables at events as mentioned in articles on the VSB Web site. Exhibit 20 EDWARD DAVIS ~ VSB HEAD ATTORNEY - Plaintiffs complaint with the Virginia State Bar was turned away by Edward Davis, Counsel for the Virginia State Bar. Plaintiffs Complaint was written with the help of a lawyer who teaches Ethics for the VSB, he was a bit shocked how it was handled, but, explained to Plaintiff the people Plaintiff was playing with were powerful! Plaintiffs complaint against Ilona included the following: 1. Disingenuous with the Alexandria Court - lying in court and knowingly filing disingenuous papers with the Alexandria Circuit Court. 2. A letter dated February 8, 2008 saying Plaintiff better drop the suit or else 3. Mismanagement of the Sonia Grenadier Trust by her law firm 4. With holding Plaintiffs Note which Ilona still has, for malicious manipulation, lies, & fraud. 5. Legal ethics rule 1.16 (d)and (c) A letter dated June 23, 2009 from Mr. Davis - is Quoted "As explained to you previously, the fact that you disagree with the positions taken by your opponent, or with her tactics (which appear to be simple inducements not to proceed with your lawsuit), does not mean that she acted unethically." He then goes on for 2 1/2 pages. defending the malicious manipulation, illegal behavior of Ilona .- Plaintiff having reviewed several situations where attorneys have lost the right to practice for a month for over charging or forgetting to file something with the courts. But, Ilona had past President of the Virginia State Bar Ben DiMuro who has also left 10% of his estate to the VSB represent her. Has Edward Davis send me a letter accusing me of being involved with the mismanagement, Plaintiff had never seen any of the documents or anything till after the theft of the funds, in the Grenadier's Law Firm. The trust was run out of the Grenadier Law Firm. Virginia Bar Complaint Outline / Ilona Ely Freedman Grenadier Heckman VSB Docket # 09-NAT076104 st July 28,2008 1 Complaint 1. That Ilona lied in court on September 12, 2007 All facts can be found in the Motion for Default Dated September 21, 2009 Which a copy was sent in with the complaint 2. Letter from Mrs. Grenadier suggesting I had better drop the suit Dated February 8, 2008 3. Ilona presented false statements in her Counter Claim and Cross Complaint which are proven through her own documentation. These false statements were filed and are on Court Record. On August 4, 2008 Plaintiff received a letter from Mr. James C. Bodie saying they would not be taking action against Ilona. Plaintiff then did pursue it and asked them to review it again after sending in more information. Plaintiff was also turned down on the review. Plaintiff was basically told because Ilona wished for a different outcome her behavior was acceptable to the Virginia Bar.

    13 | The Appearance of Justice is as important as Justice itself

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

    Virginia Bar Complaint #2 April 29, 2009 With the first Complaint Ilona had broken the Ethics rule on Knowingly Filing false information with the courts, making false statements in Court, recording documents along with Admissions statements that were disingenuous, and lying in Court, Fraud on the Court. Plaintiff learned now Ilona had broken the Ethics Rule 1.16 (d) and (e) by refusing to give Plaintiff the NOTE that she acting as and manipulating Plaintiff as her lawyer had written and had insisted on being the only one to hold a copy of Note. Plaintiff attached much evidence on this complaint of Ilona being very disingenuous. With all her statements she made and how she mislead all the other attorneys with the truth of the amount of funds that were stolen from the Sonia Grenadier Trust from Ilona/Grenadier law firm. Plaintiff showed how Ilona had personally financially benefited from all of these actions, by millions of dollars in Real Estate. *** These ethics and rule complaints by Plaintiff were from Mr. Edward L. Davis being combined and looked at together. ***Plaintiff from Mr. Daviss letters believes he doesnt understand the complaints, doesnt know the law \ nor is he looking at the evidence that has been provided to show that Ilona is lying. Mr. Davis was by all appearance in collusion to protect the Network. Informed by the VSB - Mr. Edward Davis not to file any reports they would ignore all reports from Plaintiff which they have done which can be verified by the Face book conversation between Plaintiff and Ethics attorney James Michael McCauley. Exhibit 21 JAMES MICHAEL MCCAULEY VSB ETHICS ATTORNEY Contacts Plaintiff over a year ago and tells Plaintiff a friend asked him to look into this on the side - Plaintiff with good faith met with him when he was in the Washington DC area. He requested Plaintiff in good faith send him the information - One year later he hasn't had time to look at the information Plaintiff sent him - Mr. McCauley is paid every day by the Virginia State Bar to look at Ethical problems - Mr. McCauley is the Ethic's Counsel for the Virginia State Bar - Teaches classes to lawyers on Ethics and at Universitys - Question: Has he ignored this because of the power Ben Dimuro has as past president, was this a favor to ignore the laws these Judges and Lawyers have broken? Or has he taken into consideration the tables at events Ilona purchases and how much her Escrow account interest supports his and other of his colleagues jobs. The 10% Ben DiMuro is donating from his Estate and his influence. In his correspondence back and forth he has told Plaintiff she has been too hard on his boss Edward Davis. If you to go to the VSB web site and look at what Lawyers with less power have loss there licenses or been disciplined by the VSB. It is 10% of the Crimes Ilona has gotten away with. Plaintiff has looked at the infractions other lawyers have been disciplined for and spoken to them. They felt they were in many cases treated unfairly when you look at the more powerful lawyers and what they get away with. Plaintiff believes that he scammed her. Plaintiff believed a man who used his activities with his church or family as an excuse as to why he hadn't had time to look into the situation as the reason for him to be a man of honor. Over one year later a man who gets paid to look at Ethics complaints Plaintiff realized was not a man of Ethics but, a man who was out to protect his friends, his profession, and The Network When Plaintiff confronts him he threatens Plaintiff - Trying to intimidate Plaintiff as the Judge's, the Commonwealth Attorney, the Clerk of Court and the Supreme Court of Virginia, all have done. Exhibit 22

    14 | The Appearance of Justice is as important as Justice itself

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

    JON HUDDLESTON President of the VSB The rules and the VSB Ethics codes are very clear if you are aware of an infraction of another lawyer or Judge you are to report it or are liable. Jon Huddleston by all appearance is liable. Exhibit 23 PATSEY TICER Plaintiffs State Representatives - Patsy Ticer - set it up so Plaintiff would meet with Martha Kent - Martha sat listened to Plaintiffs situation - Then explained to Plaintiff - She had walked in Plaintiff shoes understood Plaintiffs situation - she was the x-wife of a Judge She and her family members couldnt get a fair trial in Virginia - Plaintiff needed to drop this Plaintiff couldnt win and move on as Plaintiff had no Rights in Virginia- Helped fund raise for Ed Semonian. Exhibit 24 DAVID ENGLIN Do not contact me about this issue I do not care. Exhibit 25 BEN DIMURO April 1989 met with JW and her then husband David to discuss a fire that he was representing GIC/Monroe Ave partnership for the overage on the insurance. Wrote threatening letter that Plaintiff was trying to Extort money from Ilona - Money that Ilona owed Plaintiff from malicious manipulation, and stealing it from Plaintiff. Past President of the Virginia State Bar

    11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 15 | The Appearance of Justice is as important as Justice itself

    VSB President-elect Bernard J. DiMuro and his wife, Sandy, have designated 10% of their estate to the Virginia Law Foundation. DiMuro is the first Virginia attorney to make a gift of this kind to the VLF, according to VLF Executive Director Sharon Tatum. DiMuro said he wanted to make a law-related donation to an entity with the ability to administer the funds effectively. A Big part of the Old Boys Network and through Collusion and Power has kept everyone in check to protect his paying client Ilona Disingenuous in Respondents Joint Motion to Dismiss Petition for Appeal Dated Feb 2, 2011 in the Supreme Court of Virginia on Page 2 Paragraph 2 - Here, Petitioner has failed to ensure that the record contains either transcripts or a written statement of facts. Exhibit 27 HILLARY J. COLLYER - DiMuro Ginsberg PC - Stand in for Ben DiMuro in protecting Ilona MICHAEL WEISER Represented David Mark Grenadier - can be found to be in Collusion with the old Boys Network here. As favor or as ignorance can be proven with his filings at 4 minutes to 5pm without notification to Plaintiff to prevent Motion being heard was in benefit to the Alexandria Judges Lied in Respondents Joint Motion to Dismiss Petition for Appeal Dated Feb 2, 2011 in the Supreme Court of Virginia on Page 2 Paragraph 2 - Here, Petitioner has failed to ensure that the record contains either transcripts or a written statement of facts. Exhibit 28 ANN SCHMIDT Had a fiduciary responsibility to Plaintiff and the Bankruptcy Court. She supported Ilona/David/GIC in receiving moneys that belonged to Plaintiff. Fraud on the Court & Perjury against Plaintiff who paid Ann Schmidt and who Ann Schmidt had a fiduciary responsibility to the Court and to Plaintiff. Ann Schmitt and other attorneys in her firm Reed Smith have actions are Fraud on the Court. Has shown favoritism to Ilona/David/GIC part of her judicial network, instead of protecting her client. Exhibit 29 HEATHER JENQUINE Represented Ilona in court in collusion to protect her boss.

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

    STATE OF VIRGINIA Rated 47 and 49 in two separate studies in Integrity & Ethics. The state of Virginia through the collusion/conspiracy against Janice and her girls has left the state and its state employees who have acted outside of their duties, to prevent Plaintiff due process, her United States & Virginia Constitutional Rights, Religious and Civil Rights liable. Exhibit 30

    th

    th

    Statement of Facts
    Plaintiff filed claims in the City of Alexandria Circuit Court in September, 2007 against GIC, Ilona & David, related to Real Estate located at 28 East Bellefonte Avenue, Alexandria VA owned 50% by Plaintiff and 50% by GIC/Ilona/David . GIC/Ilona/David had failed to pay their fair share of expenses related to the Property. Plaintiff claimed damages of approximately $300,000, including interest compounded at 10%. Ilona / David were related to the late Judge Albert Grenadier of the Circuit Court in The City of Alexandria. To date the Bellefonte Claim and the Note being withheld has a value over $1,000.000 ( One Million). At the time that Plaintiff filed suit, the judges of the Circuit Court were Judge Haddock, Judge Kemler, and Judge Kloch. On or about September 12, 2007, In court, Ilona lied to Judge Kloch about being served by the Sheriffs which Davids brother Brian is a sheriff in the Court House. Plaintiff was admonished by Judge Kloch not giving more time for Service. That next time give enough time for service and not to be back on the docket till October of 2007. Keeping in mind the Sheriffs office and Michael Weisers office is right next door, the buildings are attached. Plaintiff then learned from a Federal Judge it is illegal for a lawyer to lie in court and any judge would be disgusted with an attorney that did so, that Plaintiff should file a Motion for Default. Plaintiff filed a Motion for default ( exhibit 9 ) and a Praecipe for the Motion for Default to be heard on October 10, 2007. (As demanded by Judge Kloch to give time for service not to be heard till sometime in October) Plaintiff on or about September 22, 2007 was informed by Diane Fiske, the Court administrator, that all three judges had recused themselves. The Slippery Slope of the Network goes into action. The rule on motions in the Circuit Court of Virginia is filed on a Wednesday by 5 pm to be heard the following Wednesday. The Motion for Default was filed on September 21, 2007 and heard on December 5, 2007. Instead of the customary 7 days it took 75 days for motion to be heard. Judge Thomas A. Fortkort chosen by the City of Alexandria judges denied the motion. Judge Fortkort sent a strong message it is ok for Ilona an attorney, officer the court to lie in Court, the Network would protect her. Judge Fortkort should have known the law and recused himself for his relationship with Defendant or judges that had recused themselves and not filed the appropriate paper work. This was in violation of Plaintiffs Civil Rights, Constitutional Rights, and the rules of the Supreme Court of Virginia, Virginia Code, as Judges they had the responsibility of knowing the law. In conclusion the Judges either did not know the law incompetence, or, they ignored the law unconscionable! Plaintiffs right to Due Process under the United States Constitution, the Virginia Constitution, Virginia Code were violated and Judge Fortkorts Order is Void as he did not have jurisdiction, he has lost his judicial immunity. Plaintiff questioned Diane Fiske about access to a judge that was chosen at arms length and was informed that the only way a judge would be chosen by the Virginia Supreme Court was if she or the Judges could not find a Judge to hear the Motion. On February 13, 2008 Judge Brown was brought in by The Circuit Court of Alexandria to hear 3 Motions 1) Motion to Compel, 2) Motion to amend Complaint, 3) Motion to Compel, Judge Brown ruled on all three Motions with Orders that should be considered VOID! Judge
    16 | The Appearance of Justice is as important as Justice itself

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

    Brown then returned on May 7, 2008 to hear Plaintiffs Second Motion for Default as Ilona had Lied again in the Answer to the Bill of Complaint and in her Counterclaim and Cross-Complaint filed on February 27, 2008, for letter sent on February 8, 2008 to Plaintiff bulling, threatening Plaintiff she had better drop this suit. Ilona by knowingly filing false documents with the court had committed Fraud on the Court. See (Exhibit 1 & 10) Again these orders should be VOID! After court Ilona informed Plaintiff that Judge Brown called her often for legal advice. That Plaintiff should be grateful to Ilona for a listing called Holland Road and that David hadnt stolen the money out of the Sonia Grenadier Trust. Ilona also informed Plaintiff, she and her family had nothing to do with Plaintiffs daughters because they were raised Catholic and went to Catholic school. Ilona is Jewish she and her family have gone approximately 20 years with no contact to the girls, which Ilona would be considered there grandmother and her husband Jerry blood relative to the girls. Plaintiff then proceeded back to Judges chambers to find Ilona in the arms of Chief Judge Haddock. When Ilona left the chambers Plaintiff turned to Judge Haddock to introduce herself to be told You will not get a fair trial we LOVE ILONA. Plaintiff turned to Court Administrator Diane Fiske in shock and disbelieve of what had just been said to Plaintiff. Plaintiff again asked how to have a judge that wasnt part of the Network that would be fair chosen at arms length. Plaintiff again was informed that the only way that a Judge could be chosen would be if they the Judges couldnt find one. This is the complete opposite of Virginia Code 17.1 - 105 (b). Plaintiff on June 18, 2008 confirmed the rule with the Supreme Court of Virginia and Filed a Motion for Trial by Jury, a Motion for Default: 1) for all the reasons Motion for Default dated September 21, 2007, 2) For all the reasons Motion for Default dated February 3) For all the untruths in the Admissions 4) For letters defendant sent bulling, threatening Plaintiff if she didnt drop suit. Filed June 18, 2008 not heard till July 9, 2008 by Judge Brown. Again Plaintiff is denied and Ilona was allowed all deception. Judge Browns Orders are all VOID! He did not have jurisdiction the three times he was chosen by his friends the Circuit Court Judges and according to Ilona has a very personal relationship with her where he took legal advice from her at no charge on a regular basis. This was in violation of Plaintiffs Civil Rights, Constitutional Rights, and the rules of the Supreme Court of Virginia, Virginia Code, as a Judge he had the responsibility of knowing the law. In conclusion he either did not know the law incompetence, or, he ignored the law unconscionable! Plaintiffs right to Due Process under the United States Constitution, the Virginia Constitution, Virginia Code were violated and Judge Browns Orders are Void as he did not have jurisdiction and he has lost his judicial immunity. On September 11, 2008 Kangaroo Court was held by the Networks Judge John J. McGrath, chosen by the Judges of the City of Alexandria. Plaintiff lost. Plaintiff then filed for reconsideration which was denied. Judge McGrath dismissed the case in September, 2008.1

    27 28

    In his August 12, 2010 decision vacating his decision and recusing himself, Judge Kloch disclosed a close business relationship with Judge McGrath through Judicial Solutions, a private dispute resolution company based in Harrisonburg. Needless to say, this creates the inference that Judge Kloch may have been involved in the selection of Judge McGrath the exact type of appearance of impropriety that Va.Code 17.1.105(B) is designed to avoid, i.e. recused judges (or judges who should be recused) selecting their successors instead of the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court.

    17 | The Appearance of Justice is as important as Justice itself

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

    Plaintiff pro se has refused to give up the fight of Justice. Plaintiff is not going to be intimidated by The Virginia Old Boy Network on getting a trial with a Judge with jurisdiction. The saying Equal Justice for All includes Plaintiff. Plaintiff continued with complaints to the Supreme Court of Virginia, JIRC, VSB, The courts of Justice and Plaintiffs legislature members to only learn that they too, were party to the Network and in the business of not protecting the Public only protecting the Old Boy Network. Judge John McGrath, an out of Circuit Court judge was chosen by the Circuit Court to hear the matter in May, 2008. Judge McGrath dismissed the case in September, 2008. In June, 2010, Plaintiff learned of Va.Code 17.1.105(B). On July 13, 2010, Plaintiff filed a motion to set aside all decisions from September 17, 2007 forward because the out of Circuit Court judges were improperly appointed. Plaintiff filed an addendum on August 4, 2010. Judge Kloch denied Plaintiffs post-trial motion on August 11, 2010 (even though he had recused himself in 2007 and retired in April, 2008) and then recused himself and immediately vacated his decision on August 12, 2010. Sending defendant a letter stating That the appearance of Justice is just as important as Justice itself Thereafter, Judge Dawkins denied Plaintiffs post trial motion on or about October 20, 2010 even though in June, 2010 Plaintiff was informed by Diane Fiske that all judges of the Circuit Court had recused themselves which included Judge Dawkins. In court Plaintiff requested Judge Dawkins to recuse himself; he stated He did not have to, because he was not a judge at the time of the case. In April, 2008, Judge Kloch retired and was replaced by Judge Dawkins who was appointed on April 24, 2008 and sworn in on June, 2008. The statement by Judge Dawkins was disingenuous. Plaintiff then went on to ask him to recuse himself which he refused to do. By all appearance his refusal to recuse himself that he is in collusion with the other judges to protect the interest of the old boy network. Plaintiff then filed a Reconsideration which was denied with prejudice. Plaintiff then went forward with an appeal to the Supreme Court of Virginia. ( Exhibit 34) . Plaintiff argued her case in front of the Supreme Court of Virginia on May 24, 2008. Ilona hired Ben DiMuro on or about April 17, 2009. The new defense was to accuse plaintiff of Extortion. Ben DiMuro sent plaintiff a very threatening letter on April 17, 2009 (Exhibit 27). The network Randy Sengel then in collusion with Ilona sent Detective Pak from the City of Alexandria Police Department out to try and intimidate Plaintiff saying Plaintiff was trying to extort monies from Ilona. Plaintiff at that time agreed to meet with Detective Pak and have conversation taped. Plaintiff has learned recently that there is no police report case ID number of such incident. When Plaintiff had inquired about if charges would be filed Plaintiff was informed by Detective Pak that he had investigated this personally for Randy Sengel and it would be up to Commonwealth attorney Randy Sengel a part of the old boy network as is Ilona and Ben DiMuro. Plaintiff after having the Supreme Court of Virginia, VSB, JIRC, Plaintiffs legislatures, the Courts of Justice, etc taking the stand as Plaintiff had been told You are no longer one of us, you need to forget this, You cannot get a fair trial learned of an option of asking for a Special Grand Jury to investigate the Crimes of the Network, Judges, Lawyers, Government employees. Plaintiff send a letter to The Chief Judge Donald M. Haddock requesting a Special Grand Jury and to Randy Sengel Commonwealth Attorney to be ignored by Judge Haddock and to be told by Randy Sengel NO. Plaintiff was persistent and showed up in Court on October 13, 2011 to go in front of the Grand Jury where Judge Haddock informed Plaintiff I was going to let you go in front of the Grand
    18 | The Appearance of Justice is as important as Justice itself

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

    Jury but, I have decided not to because I believe you are going to talk about ME. I demand you back on December 12, 2012 to go in front of the Grand Jury Question: Was the donations from Ben DiMuro & Ilona Grenadier to his portrait have anything to do with the change of mind? Or was it the Boat ride/Party? February 13, 2012 Randy Sengel & Judge Potter held Kangaroo Court in the City of Alexandria Court Room 4. It is made obvious the collusion, conspiracy of the above defendants to stop Plaintiff from due process. Plaintiff said several times a mistake was made lets fix it. Instead the Retaliation and Retribution has only gotten worse. Plaintiff lives in fear of these Judges, Commonwealth Attorney Randy Sengel, and others, along with Defendants Ilona Ely Freedman Grenadier Heckman, Jerry Heckman, David Mark Grenadier.

    Outline of Facts
    2007 September 5, 2007 ~This was a very simple case a Real Estate Partnership owned 50% Janice Wolk Grendier & 50% GIC David Grenadier / Ilona Grenadier September 5, 2007 - Plaintiff Filed with the Alexandria Circuit Court a Motion for Reinstatement of the Bill of Complaint of 28 E Bellefonte Ave Partnership. At the time I thought it best for notification to the parties to be served through the Sheriffs office. The court date for the Motion was on September 12, 2007. September 12, 2007 - Motions Day Judge Kloch is the judge that hears the case. This resulted in the Motion for Default against Ilona filed on September 21, 2007. As the Motion for Default goes into more detail Ilona was disingenuous in court claiming she hadnt been served. But, she couldnt have known of the court date unless she was served. She admitted in court to Judge Kloch that David Grenadiers attorney; Mr. Michael Weiser was aware of the court date because she had faxed the information to him. Judge Kloch kept passing it over to give Mr. Weiser the chance to show up. He then sent a clerk down to the Sheriffs office who came back and according to Judge Kloch said that Ilona nor Mr. Weiser had been served according to the Sheriffs records. I explained to the Judge the only way Ilona could be there was if she was served. Ilona admitted to having been served and faxing the service to Mr. Weiser. At which point Judge Kloch dismissed everything to be re-heard. Ilona had not been telling the truth when she said she hadnt been served. Plaintiff also now finds it very questionable what the clerk was told by the Sheriffs office, or what was really said to Judge Kloch. After Court Plaintiff went down to the Sheriffs office. They gave Plaintiff a copy of Ilonas service. Mr. Weisers papers were not in the box, his office is in the same building as the Sheriffs offices, they couldnt say whether he had been served or not. September 21, 2007 - JWG filed Motion for Default, and The Motion to Reinstate (just in case) for October 10, 2007. September 22, 2007 All the Alexandria Judges recuse themselves from hearing the case. This is the start of them bringing in Judges that hold Kangaroo Court where the decision is made prior to court. This is the start of the collusion to bring in Judges to rule in Ilona & Davids side. Ilona would brag about her relationship with the Judges and how they called her and she would give free legal advice. Plaintiff was neive in believing she would get a fair trial.

    19 | The Appearance of Justice is as important as Justice itself

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

    October 17, 2007 Letter from Diane Fiske After informing Plaintiff that the Judges had recuse themselves she would be finding Judges to hear the case. Judge Frank A. Hoss was available for November 28, 2007 at 10.00 am. At the time of this letter the Judges were: 1. Judge Donald M. Haddock We learned in the Spring of 2008 he had recused himself from hearing the case. 2. Judge John E. Kloch Ilona had lied to him in court on September 5, 2007 He could have heard the Motion for Default as he knew the truth But, the truth is not what he was looking for. 3. Judge Lisa Bondareff Kemler Her Father was our pediatrician for our girls, I believe David had gone to Hebrew School with her, His father and her father were good friends/I had shown her and her husband Real Estate. November 15, 2007 Letter from Diane Fiske that the Motions Date had been changed to Wednesday, December 5, 2007 @ 10.00 am - Now this had been filed on September 21, 2007 Is now being heard on December 5, 2007. December 5, 2007 - Judge Thomas A. Fortkort heard Motion. Denyed Plaintiffs Motion for Default. The Motion for Default was due to Ilona Grenadier an attorney, officer of the court lying to Judge Kloch in court. December 2007 - Question Diane Fiske about a Fair Judge she informs Plaintiff the only way anyone else (Supreme Court choses Judge) Is if they cant find one. Which is incorrect the rule is the complete opposite in accordance with 17.1-105(B): Learn of June of 2010 If all the judges of any court of record are so situated in respect to any case, civil or criminal, pending in their court as to render it improper, in their opinion, for them to preside at the trial, unless the cause or proceeding is removed, as provided by law, they shall enter the fact of record and the clerk of the court shall at once certify the same to the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, who shall designate a judge of some other court of record or a retired judge of any such court to preside at the trial of such case. 2008 February 8, 2008 - Letter ( Exhibit ) from Ilona (on her law firm stationary) to Plaintiff, Ilona asserts ownership of 75% of a property Known as 28 East Bellefonte Ave, Alexandria, VA 22305. Plaintiff also felt threatened by the letter which is full of misleading and deceitful statements. February 13,2008 Judge Brown hears Motions * Ilona is not in court Heather Jenquien represented her. Motions to compel February 26, 2008 Filed with Clerk of Courts following letter: Because keep in mind all Judges had recuse themselves and all Motions had to go through Diane Fiske as she needed to find a judge or it had to be on a day they had a visiting Judge. The letter asks Ilona for dates to get back to Diane Fiske to file a Motion as no Motions could be filed without everyones ageing on the date before Diane found a Judge. February 27, 2008 - Ilona Grenadier filed on February 27, 2008 with the Circuit Court of The City of Alexandria an Answer to The Amended Bill of Complaint claiming 75% ownership of the property at 28 East Bellefonte Ave., Alexandria, VA 22305 which is a documented lie. Most of Ilona Grenadiers statements in the Answer to The Amended Bill of Complaint were disingenuous which Plaintiff has
    20 | The Appearance of Justice is as important as Justice itself

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

    supplied documentation to VSB for the purpose of establishing the truth. The following are the lies Ilona Grenadier Filed with the Circuit Court of Alexandria 1. 75% ownership 2. That plaintiff has provided no proof of actual payment for expenses ~ provided 3 times to defendants 3. Plaintiffs Bankruptcy caused by Bellefonte as Plaintiff in & out ~ Which now Plaintiff realizes she would never had been in and out if it wasnt for the manipulation and lies of Ilona Grenadier 4. 4 times Ilona ~ Defendant, Ilona Ely Grenadier, denies that Plaintiff owns or owned 50%of East Bellefonte. The document on February 27, 2008 by Ilona Ely Grenadier a lawyer was rattled with Lies - The VSB The Judges in Alexandria and her good friend - Judge Brown had no problem with that. This can be backed up with information/documentation from Admission statements from Ilona Grenadier which had several conflicting statements. The amount of money Ilona put into the property can be established by an accounting done by Ilona. The Accounting shows the 25% down payment that was contributed in the purchase of the Bellefonte Property. The documents that were filed with the Motion for Default in the Circuit Court of Alexandria can be used to verify the amount of ownership Ilona had. Ilona had in her possession the documents which showed her ownership at the time she filed the pleadings. Those pleadings were disingenuous and misleading when filed with The Circuit Court of Alexandria. March 5, 2008 File 2
    nd

    Motion for Default to be heard March 12, 2008 for the following reasons:

    1. For all the reasons as stated in Motion for Default Dated September 21, 2007 2. For all the untruths told in the Answer to Bill of Complaint by defendant and Counterclaim and Cross-Complaint filed on February 27, 2008. 3. For the letters Defendant sent bulling, threatening attached to the February Response to Ilona Ely Grenadier/GIC Motion to Quash Plaintiffs Amended Complaint / From February 8, 2008. 4. For the non response to letters to try and set a new date for depositions or to set a trial date. March 5, 2008 Filed Motion to Change Date for: Notice of Deposition and to Set Date for Trial As Defendants would not respond to any correspondence. March 11, 2008 Plaintiff files Praecipe - Remove Motions for March 12 no visiting Judges. 1. Clerk of the Court will please remove from the docket on March 12, 2008 Plaintiffs Motion to Compel as there isnt a visiting judge available to hear it. 2. This again shows that the Circuit Court Judges had recused themselves. That Plaintiff though out the case voiced her concern on getting a fair Trial. To the deaf ears of the Circuit Court of Alexandria who took the arrogant view of doing whatever they wanted to do.

    April 30, 2008 Praecipe re-file to have Motion for Default heard as Diane Fiske has found a date that works for the Judges of Alexandria to find a Judge of their choice for May 7, 2008 May 7, 2008 Motions heard by Judge Brown Ilona after court informs me after he has ruled in her favor allowing her to file false papers as an attorney in the Alexandria Circuit Court of law What good friends she and Judge Brown are and how he called her all the time for legal advice.
    21 | The Appearance of Justice is as important as Justice itself

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

    May 7, 2008 After Court 1. Iloan Grenadier again brags about her relationship with the Judges - That she has in the past & continues to give Free legal advice to Judge Brown. 2. Ilona Grenadier explains to Plaintiff why no one has anything do to with Plaintiffs children is because Plaintiff raised them Catholic. In 19 years she has seen the girls once by her choice. 3. That Plaintiff should be grateful to her for the listing on Holland Road. 4. That Ilona doesnt believe David Stole the money from the Sonia Grenadiers Trust -which only left Ilona and her law firm to steal over $95,000.00 5. Plaintiff introduced herself to Judge Haddock after he speaks with Ilona he explains to Plaintiff I could never get a fair trial as they all Love Ilona I turn to Diane Fiske shocked by the statement and express I cant believe he just said that to me. 6. Again Plaintiff asks Diane Fiske about getting Judges that arent friends of Ilonas.

    May 13, 2008 Letter from Diane P Fiske that the case would be heard by Judge John J. McGrath. This letter shows the following Judges in the letter head: 1. Donald M. Haddock 2. John E. Kloch (Retired) which means at the time Judge McGrath was chosen Judge Kloch and Judge McGrath were working together. 3. Lisa Bondareff Kemler June 18, 2008 Plaintiff Files:

    14

    1.
    15 16 17 18 19 20 21

    Motion for Default - Ilona has lied in the Admissions A. For Ilona lying in court to Judge Kloch on September 12, 2007 - Motion for Default B. For Motion for Default filed in February for Lying in the Answer to Bill of Complaint by defendant and Counter claim and Cross Complaint C. For lies in Admissions D. For the letters Defendant sent Bulling & Threatening Plaintiff if Plaintiff didnt drop suit.

    2. Motion for Trial by Jury Due to comments made by Judge Haddock & Ilona Grenadier A. Judge Haddock telling Plaintiff she could never get a fair trial as they all LOVE Ilona B. Ilona informing Plaintiff all the Judges were friends of hers & she gave them free legal advice when they called her July 2, 2008 Motion to be heard July 9, 2008 to include:

    22 23 24 25 26 27 28 22 | The Appearance of Justice is as important as Justice itself

    1. Motion for Trial by Jury 2. Motion to Compel 3. Motion for Default July 9, 2008 Judge Howe Brown rules : 1. Denies motion for Default 2. Denies motion for Trial by Jury 3. And makes both sides work on responses in the Motion to Compel

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

    Spring of 2008 Diane Fiske again advices Plaintiff the only way anyone else would choose a Judge was if they couldnt find one then it would go to the Supreme Court and they would then choose the Judge. Which was incorrect. The minute in September of 2007 when the Judges had recuse themselves is when the Supreme Court should have been choosing the Judges not the Judges themselves or Diane Fiske should not have been choosing the Judges. The Head Judge - Judge Haddock was talking and hugging Ilona while I was talking with Diane Fiske about Fair Judges that were arms length. When Ilona left I turned to Judge Haddock and introduced myself which he then went onto inform me I wouldnt get a fair trial because they all Loved Ilona . Judge Haddock is the Head Judge at the Alexandria Circuit Court. I then turned to Diane Fiske in shock and said I cant believe Judge Haddock just told me I would never get a Fair Trial because they loved Ilona. September 11, 2008 Trial with Judge John McGrath as our Judge. 1. The 1 issue I have is how first thing he did that morning was he called Ilona Grenadier and me into Chambers to have a conference to see if this could be settled. The problem I have with this is he said he had studied the file for the last 45 minutes and understood there to be an issue in including David in the conference. He also made a comment that the money/settlement shouldnt go directly to me because of judgments against me which I had none at that time. He then suggested the funds could be disbursed through Burke & Herbert Bank towards my daughters education. This was my money, not my daughters. Not that every cent I have doesnt go to them. Now please keep in mind I had been led to believe this was a judge from Harrisonburg, he had no ties to this area. While this was going on Judge Kloch lingered in the hall way. I had been very specific with the Judges office in Alexandria; I expected to have a fair judge, especially after Ilonas comments about Judge Brown, and other Judges. I still felt if I was able to tell the truth, there wouldnt be an issue. 2. Then Ilona was allowed to bring up a situation which dealt with the theft of money from the Sonia Grenadier Trust that was run out of her law office. First in the Opening Statement, and then with questioning me under oath. 3. Then when it was my time to question David and Ilona, I wasnt allowed to question them or bring The Sonia Grenadier Trust up in any way. Judge McGrath said he wasnt going to allow it brought into his court room and he really didnt understand it. I asked to explain it to him and he wouldnt hear of it. When I mentioned how they had brought it up he just went on to say he wasnt allowing it in his court room. 4. David Grenadier lied under oath. Judge McGrath was just move on. 5. He then allowed the attorneys to hammer on me. When Mrs. Grenadier got on the stand I was WARNED on how I question Mrs. Grenadier and what questions I asked her. I started asking Mrs. Grenadier questions, she broke down crying. I asked for recessto give her a chance to compose herself and was denied. 6. Mr. McGrath then went and had a very friendly lunch with Judge Kloch at Jackson 20 a new restaurant in Old Town. Only for Judge Kloch to be discussing going to work with Judge McGrath and his company Judicial Solutions. 7. He then of course found in favor of Ilona and David which I would not have had a problem with if it had been a fair trial with a Judge that had integrity. Judge McGrath was tainted and had discussed this case prior to court with Judge Kloch, and possible other Judges in the chambers. The order was written prior to closing arguments.
    st

    23 | The Appearance of Justice is as important as Justice itself

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

    September 22, 2008 - File Motion for Reconsideration With new evidence that had been dropped off at my house - A letter that David Ellsberg the Settlement attorney for Bellefonte had me write him that showed I was loaning the money to Ilona / David / GIC September 23, 2008 1. Diane Fiske - Question: Protocol (Judge was out of town last week) She will e-mail / call Judge see if he wants mailed to him or in area to stop by 2. Plaintiff Need to know take to next level 3. Andrea 703-624-4557 Commonwealth Attorneys Office Randy Sengel explained to me that Judge McGrath did a lot of work in the Circuit Court of Alexandria and was well known with the Judges. September 24, 2008 Diane heard from Judge sent him Motion-but he didnt want Exhibits - So basically didnt even consider the facts of the Motion September 26, 2008 Friday 1. Diane Fiske - 21 days hopefully something today Judge has everything th 2. Diane Afternoon received order from Judge in mail sent on 24 denying and he never looked at Exhibits confirmed by Diane 3. Randy Sengel Commonwealth Attorney tells me the JIRC Commission is where I need to go Randy Sengel Commonwealths Attorney Informs me that Judge McGrath has done a lot of work in Alexandria Circuit Court 4. Call to Judicial Inquiry & Review Commission Donald Curry informed Plaintiff that Judge McGrath was from the Arlington Area and that is how he knew about Burke & Herbert Bank had done extensive work in Alexandria Courts. 5. Plaintiff realized that the fact he was from Harrisonburg was mute it was a farce. With this new knowledge Plaintiff realized the following was true Type of Complaints the commission investigates comes under: A) Allowing Family, social or other relationships to influence this judgment B) Engaging in private conversations which may influence judicial actions C) Failing to disqualify in a proceeding in which impartiality reasonably might be questioned, because of his actions under A & B October 21, 2008 Mailed from Alexandria Virginia a complaint against Judge John McGrath to his good friend Donald Curry w/ the JIRC. October 23, 2008 Donald R Curry Counsel for JIRC sent the following : This is in response to your complaint dated October 21, 2008. Based upon what you have submitted and alleged, we have found no basis for a conclusion that there has been a violation of the Canons. A mere belief that an ex parte communication occurred, without more, does not provide a sufficient basis for Commission action. Please be advised, moreover, that the judge about whom you complaint is a th retired judge from the 26 Circuit.

    24 | The Appearance of Justice is as important as Justice itself

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

    October 27, 2008 - Fax to Randy Sengel with copy of Complaint and response to JIRC Commission. How outrages it was. His suggestion was I address members directly. November 3 - November 12, 2008 Reached out to each member of the Courts of Justice by Phone or Fax I others In regard to the illegal and unprofessional behavior of the Judges, VSB, JIRC and government employees. I still had not learned about rule 17.1-105 (b) but, I knew what had and was happening was illegal and against the law. 1. Judge Larry D. Willis 2. Honorable Virginia L. Cochran 3. James F. Fisher Esq 4. William I Fitzgerald 5. Judge Cleo E. Powell 6. Olivia A. Welsh 7. Kenneth Motero 804-786-6634 - Boss to Donald Curry 8. Tim Kaine - Governors office 804-786-2211 9. Bob McDonnel - Attorney General 804-786-2071 10. Donald Curry General Assembly 11. Department of Human Resources Mgt 804-225-2131 Carol Supreme court - HR Virginia House of Delegates Courts of Justice

    13 14 15 16 17

    1. Dave Albo Chair 2. Pamela Burham Virginia Senate 1. Henry L. Marsh III Chair Contact Comm operations (804) 698-7450 Delegate - Alexandria

    18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 25 | The Appearance of Justice is as important as Justice itself

    1. David Englin 804-698-1045 703-549-3203 Senator Alexandria 1. Patsy Ticer 804-698-7530 703-549-5770 Spoke with detail to Peggy Fax# 703-739-6761 Gave me Mr Henry Marshs number - information November 12, 2008 Fax to Henry Marsh Jackie Parker copy of complaint November 12, 2008 Fax to Dave Albo after horrid conversation. November 12, 2008 Fax Donald Curry adding letter date May 8, 2008 that Ilona had written to me, that Judge McGrath had used in making his decision on this little meeting prior to court. Which in 45 minutes Judge McGrath claims that he had studied the file that was about 8 10 inches in paper work, and that he had not called David in because of issues Plaintiff and David had. Nowhere in the file is anything in regard to David & Plaintiffs type of relationship. Appearance of Justice is just as important as Justice itself

    1 2 3 4

    November 13, 2008 Letter from Donald Curry that the letter I had sent didnt change his mind that there should be an inquiry into Judge John McGrath. November 13, 2008 letter from Henry L. Marsh lll - He referred me to The Chief Justice of the Virginia Supreme Court as he was in charge of Substitute Judges. Chief Justice Leroy Rountree Hassell, Sr. 100 North Ninth street, Richmond, Va 23219. December 8, 2008 - Fax info to Donald Curry he is of no help

    5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

    December 8, 2008 Calls to Chief Justice Leroy Rountree Hassell Sr. requesting a meeting spoke with Chief Deputy clerk Leslie David to put complaint in writing. December 10, 2008 Letter from Donald Curry they are not looking at my complaint December 18, 2008 Reach out to John McGrath to get him to do the right thing no word back from the letter Pleading with him to do the right thing and reconsider the Motion for Reconsideration or at least be respectful and look at the new evidence. Sent him several e-mails giving him more evidence and do to the right thing. December 18, 2008 Plaintiff learns from the internet that Judge John Kloch is now working with Judge john McGrath Jr. with a firm called Judicial Solutions PC *In Letter from Judge John Kloch he may have already started at Judicial Solutions at the time of my trial or it may have been agreed opinion at that time. This made it more of a conflict of interest. Not an arms length situation. If it isnt enough to have the Commonwealths Attorney tell you Judge John McGrath has done a lot of work in the Alexandria Courts. 2009 February 2009 Washingtonian top 25 Divorce attorneys includes Ilona and is referred to as A tough cookie for cases that might not be amicable, she can mix it up in a state where the old-boy network is strong March 2009 Alexandria Bar Thanks Ilona / law firm for their generosity in table sponsors April 17, 2009 Letter from Ben DiMuro threatening Plaintiff that she was trying to Extort money from Ilona (Exhibit 27) April, 29, 2009 2 VSB complaint ( Exhibit 20) response was FU our lawyers can lie steal or cheat and if they are part of the Old Boy Network we along with JIRC and the Supreme Court of Virginia are going to protect them. July 7. 2009 - Ben DiMuro, Davids sisters Robin/Racial, Andrea & Karen e-mail calling Pope a Wanker Best description of e-mail is full of Bull shit (Exhibit 27) July 14, 2009 - Letter to Chief Justice Leroy Roundtree Hassell Jr. from JWG October 23, 2009 e-mail to Randy Sengel about the law in regard to 17.1-105(b) which he ignored. Mr. Sengel said any complaints agains Judges should go to JIRC he saw no fault in it. Mr. Sengel reaction was to try and charge me with Extortion ( Exhibit 16) On or around October 28, 2009 LM for Detective Pak about getting together I had been advised not to meet with him. I choose to Plaintiff knew I had the truth.
    26 | The Appearance of Justice is as important as Justice itself
    nd

    1 2 3 4

    October 29, 2009 Conversation to meet with Detective Pak October 30, 2009 Meet with Detective Pak and a women at my home for a few hours. I ask to have it recorded. It is recorded. Yet when I later asked Detective Pak if there would be charges I was informed it was up to Randy Sengel. Randy Sengel had personally requested the investigation. There is no insistent report or any record with the Alexandria Police of such investigation. 2010

    June 21, 2010 Letter Ms. Patricia L. Harrington Re- VSB


    6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

    August 2010 Virginia Attorney Calls Diane Fiske she confirms all the Judges in The Alexandria Circuit Court had recuse themselves July 2010 Janice Confirms the Rule with the Supreme Court July 12, 2010 e-mail to Defendants that Plaintiff was filing Motion for Default to be heard on September 21, 2010 to be heard on July 28, 2010 July 13, 2010 File Motion July 26, 2010 w/ 4 min left Michael Wieser files he cant be there * Remember Plaintiff in September of 2007 was admonished for giving enough time and notice to Defendants. Mr. Wieser knew about this conflict 11 days prior to deciding he wasnt going to be able to show up in court. July , 2010 Ilona files Opposition werent we supposed to be in court on the 28 ? when did she know that Michael Wiser would be filing with the court the conflict? August 4, 2010 After being reprimanded by the Circuit Court about contacting everyone being treated rudely now every time Plaintiff calls the Alexandria Circuit Court file Motion to be heard on August 11, 2010 August 11, 2010 Judge Kloch visiting Judge is 100% Disingenuous August 11, 2010 Plaintiff is informed The Circuit Court would not take her phone calls or any messages from her August 12, 2010 Plaintiff receives an e-mail - Judge Kloch Decides to recluse himself works with Judge McGrath Quote from Judge Klochs letter I believe strongly that the appearance of justice is equally important as justice itself On or around August 13, 2010 it was agreed by the Alexandria Circuit Court, Defendants & Plaintiff after Alexandria Circuit Court giving the Plaintiff much grief scheduled a new hearing for October 13, 2010 at 2pm. October 6, 2010 Plaintiff files Praecipe for Hearing on October 13, 2010 for all Motions that had been filed to be heard along with a Motion for Sanctions filed on October 6, 2010. The Circuit Court of Alexandrias rules are 7 days prior to a Motion being heard it is to be filed with the Clerks office and Notice to be delivered to opposing parties. October 13, 2010 / In the Alexandria Circuit Court
    27 | The Appearance of Justice is as important as Justice itself
    th

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

    1. Judge Nolan B Dawkins preceding, Michael Weiser Esg was there for David Grenadier Defendant, Hillary J. Collyer, Esq for Ilona Grenadier & GIC, Plaintiff Janice Wolk Grenadier was present pro se. Iloan & David were not present 2. There was no Court Reporter. 3. Janice Wolk Grenadier started with her Motion to have her Motion for Default to be reheard as the Judges in the Circuit Court of Alexandria Virginia in 2007 had recluse themselves from hearing the case. That the Alexandria Circuit Court had not followed the rules of the Supreme Circuit Court 17.1 -105 (B) . 4. The Judges of record in 2007 were Judge John Kloch , Judge Lisa Bondareff Kemler, & Judge Donald M. Haddock. 5. Judge Nolan Dawkins pointed out to Plaintiff she had misstated the Motion as it should have been titled a Motion for Default Judgment. 6. Plaintiff then went on to focus on the Merits of the Case which included the following Facts: Stressing that the Judge understands a Mistake was made by the Alexandria Circuit Court and this was a chance to make right that Mistake. The following facts & evidence was presented to Judge Nolan Dawkins: 7. On September 12, 2007 that Defendant had been disingenuous in the Alexandria Circuit Court that Defendant Ilona Ely Grenadier as a lawyer representing herself and Grenadier Investment as an officer of the Court had been disingenuous in the Alexandria Circuit Court. Ilona Grenadier is the widow to the late Judge Albert Grenadier of the Alexandria Circuit Court. Judge Albert Grenadier had worked with and had personal relations with Judge Haddock, Judge Kloch, and a close relationship to the father of Judge Lisa Bondereff Kemler whose father was the pediatrician to Plaintiffs girls, and had gone to Hebrew school with David Grenadier Defendant. 8. Plaintiff presented to the Judge that the Motion for Default was filed on September 21, 2007 and was not heard till December 5, 2007 by Judge Frank A. Hoss. 9. Plaintiff presented to Judge Dawkins a Letter Dated October 17, 2010 setting the date for November 28, 2007 from the Circuit Court of Alexandria written by Diane Fiske Court Administrator. Plaintiff then Presented letter dated November 15, 2007 that the Judge had to reschedule to December 5, 2010. Both letters were written by Diane Fiske court Administrator. 10. Plaintiff then presented letter dated May 13, 2008 that Judge John J. McGrath had been chosen as the Judge for Trial. This letter was also written by Diane Fiske who had informed Plaintiff all Alexandria Circuit Court Judges had recluse themselves from hearing any Motions or Trial 11. Plaintiff then addressed the rules of the Alexandria Circuit Court and that Motions are normally nd th st heard the 2 and 4 Wednesday of the month and the Motions needed to be filed by the 1 or rd 3 Wednesday of the month. That my motion took almost 3 months to be heard. 12. Plaintiff then informed Judge Dawkins how after the Motions would be heard by visiting Judges Defendant Ilona Grenadier an officer of the court would brag about what good friends she was with the Judge and how the Judges would call defendant Ilona Grenadier when they had legal questions. 13. Plaintiff would then go to Judges chambers and request Judges that were chosen at arms length. Plaintiff explained to Judge Dawkins that she was informed that the Alexandria Circuit Court Judges choose the Judge unless they couldnt find a Judge. The Alexandria Circuit Court choose the Days Motions & Trial to be heard to coincide with the dates they could find the Judge of their choose. 14. Plaintiff then also presented to Judge Dawkins letter that Judge Kloch had written on August 12, 2010, at which time Plaintiff pointed out Judge Kochs statement further I believe strongly that the appearance of justice is equally important as justice itself It was Judge Kloch that defendant

    28 | The Appearance of Justice is as important as Justice itself

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

    had been disingenuous September 12, 2007. Which is at that point the Judges had recluse themselves. 15. Judge Dawkins acknowledged having seen the letter prior to court at which time Plaintiff asked Judge Dawkins to recluse himself. Plaintiff felt as a Judge working with Judges who had been disingenuous in this court he could not Judge this situation fairly. Judge Dawkins refused to recluse himself saying he wasnt a Circuit Court Judge at the time this case was heard. On or around August 13, 2010 it was agreed by the Alexandria Circuit Court, Defendants & Plaintiff after Alexandria Circuit Court giving the Plaintiff much grief scheduled a new hearing for October 13, 2010 at 2pm. 16. Judge Dawkins then went on to reference that Judge John McGrath was from Harrisonburg, Virginia. Which Judge John McGrath is from Harrisonburg, Virginia. 17. Plaintiff then went on to inform Judge Dawkins that Judge John McGrath now lived in Harrisonburg, but, was raised in Arlington which she learned from Donald Curry attorney for the JERK committee who as a friend of Judge John McGrath and refused a complaint to be filed. When complaint was forced on him, rejected it with no follow up on the facts. That the Commonwealth States Attorney Randy Sangel had informed Plaintiff that Judge John McGrath had done extensive work in The Circuit Court of Alexandria as a Judge. Plaintiff then informed Judge Dawkins what had taken place the day of trail with Judge John McGrath on September 11, 2008:

    October 13, 2010 Judge Dawkins Order reads: 1. Denied Motion for Default to be heard by a Judge with Jurisdiction 2. Denied Sanctions 3. Denied action to Recluse Himself. October 13, 2010 Plaintiff calls Alexandria Circuit Court to set up a date for a Motion to be heard. Plaintiffs is told she must not just e-mail defendants; she must talk to them as well before date can be set. Plaintiff follows the rules put to her by the Circuit Court of Alexandria October 14, 2010 Plaintiff is informed The Alexandria Circuit Court will not allow any other Motions on this case to be filed. October 14, 2010 Plaintiff files with the court Facts of what the Plaintiff has claimed and what the actions were of the Alexandria Circuit Court to have it on file. October 19, 2010 Plaintiff flies with the court Motion for Reconsideration of Order Dated October 13, 2010 Plaintiff in researching information for Appeal to the Supreme Court finds the following information that had been filed with the Circuit Court of Alexandria, which Plaintiff felt proved Plaintiff had not lied in court as Judge Dawkins had accused Plaintiff of doing.

    1. 2.

    March 11, 2008 Plaintiff Filed a Praecipe in the Alexandria Circuit Court that states the Alexandria Circuit Court wouldnt hear the Motion on the date first filed because there wasnt a visiting Judge , that the only way Motions would be heard is if there was a visiting Judge. June 18, 2008 Plaintiff Filed a Motion for Trial by Jury So Plaintiff could get a fair trial, again it was denied. Even though Plaintiff stated in Motion for Trial by Jury the difficulties of filing Motions as it could only be done on the days of Visiting Judges and referenced Since the start

    29 | The Appearance of Justice is as important as Justice itself

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

    of this the Judges in Alexandria have explained to Plaintiff the difficulties of being able to hear the motions or fairly judge this case

    3.

    June 18, 2008 Motion for Default (Should have been Motion for Default Judgment) At this point defendants had September 12, 2007 disingenuous in court, Had knowingly filed untruths and false statements in there Bill of Complaint by defendant and Counterclaim and Crosscomplaint filed on February 27, 2008. All the untruths filed in there Admissions that can be backed up with the interrogatories. Defendant Ilona Grenadier is a lawyer, an officer of the court that should be held to a higher standard than to be allowed to be disingenuous in the Alexandria Circuit Court.

    October 20, 2010 Order by Judge Nolan B. Dawkins 1. Denies Reconsideration Order along this case is dismissed with prejudice and to be placed among the ended cases. November 4, 2010 Plaintiff delivers to the trial Judge a copy Written Statement of Facts to the Alexandria Circuit Court Chambers. 2011 January 20, 2011 ~ JWG Appeal to Supreme Court ~ Record # 110156

    12

    February 2, 2011 - Letter Ben Dimuro Give notice file dismiss of Petition for Appeal
    13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

    February 3, 2011 - Respondents Joint Motion to Dismiss Petition for Appeal Due to Plaintiff not filing Statement of Facts - Disingenuous February 8, 2011 Petitioners Response to Respondents Joint Motion to Dismiss Petition For Appeal on Page 2 Respondents state Petitioners state Petitioner failed to ensure that the record contains either a transcript or a written statement of facts necessary to permit resolution of appellate issues is fatal to her appeal. Accordingly, the Petition should be dismissed for Petitioners non-compliance with rule 5:11 Petitioner filed Court Statement of Facts for October 13, 2010 & October 20, 2010 Order o Made a part of Record in accordance to Supreme Court Rule 5:11 (c) (1) and (2). February 10, 2011 Appeal May 4, 2011 May 24, 2011 June 20, 2011 June 27, 2011 Respondents filed with the Supreme Court - Joint Brief in Opposition to Petition for

    Letter from Supreme Court of Virginia to Plaintiff May 24, 2011 Oral Argument Plaintiff Oral Argument in Richmond in front of the Supreme Court of Virginia Supreme Court of Virginia Denies Petition, Ignores the law. Plaintiff Petition for Reconsideration Ilona Grenadier & Ben DiMuro generous donation to the Judge Donald M.

    September 2011 Haddock Portrait fund

    September 15, 2011 Ilona Genadier through her law firm throws a party on the Miss Mallory in Alexandria, Virginia, by all appearance a $100,000 + party. September 20, 2011 Supreme Court Deny Petition for Reconsideration, once again ignore the law.

    30 | The Appearance of Justice is as important as Justice itself

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

    September 21, 2011 Plaintiff writes Letters to Brown - McGrath - Fortkort -Dawkins - Haddock That Plaintiff planed on suing them civilly *** Plaintiff then learns about the different options with a Grand Jury and her rights under the United States Constitution & Virginia Constitution September 27, 2011 Plaintiff sends Letter to Randy Sengel Commonwealth Attorney & Chief Judge Donald M. Haddock Requesting either one of them to Convene a Special Grand Jury Under Code of Virginia 19.2-191 (2) September 29, 2011 Randy Sengel Letter to Plaintiff - He respectfully declines to. He is fully aware of Plaintiffs rights being violated and on several occasions Plaintiff has reached out to him and he has ignored the law for his friends in the Network. - Plaintiff files a Praecipe with the Clerk of Courts office to speak to the Grand Jury on October 11, 2011. Plaintiff was in Clerks office for over an hour before clerk took Parecipe and would not stamp or put in writing any type of acknowledgement that he had accepted it. No fees were asked of Plaintiff and no deficiency notice ever sent to Plaintiff in regards to fees. October 5, 2011 ~ Randy Sengel Letter to Plaintiff no not going to allow in front of Regular Grand Jury - I am not one of his witness - He can find no authority, statutory or otherwise, which permits a private citizen to appear solely upon his or her own volition in front of a regular grand jury October 6, 2011 194, 19.2-197 Letter to Randy Sengel With the information on authority, statutory 19.2-191 2, 19.2-

    October 6, 2011 Letter to Ed Semonian Re- Wrongful Denial Letter from Commonwealths Attorney Randy Sengel Reminding Mr. Semonian what his duty as a Constitutional Officer, elected servant October 7, 2011 Randy Sengel e-mail receipt of letter and Letter sent to Ed Semonia October 11, 2011 Refused Grand Jury - Plaintiff was informed first she would be allowed in front of the Grand Jury. Chief Judge Donald M. Haddock who had informed Plaintiff back in 2007 that Plaintiff could not get a fair trial as WE LOVE ILONA now informs Plaintiff he was going to let her go in front of the Grand Jury but has decided not to as he believes Plaintiff is going to talk about him. James Manship an expert on the law of Grand Jurys and has been in front of a Grand Jury in Virginia stood up and explained then the only information that would be given to the grand jury was in regard to an attorney involved in the forgery of a Trust and pilfering the Trust through her law firm. Ilona Grenadier Judge Haddock refused. Demanded Plaintiff back on December 12, 2011 to go in front of the Grand Jury. October 11, 2011 Document Re Grand Jury Request of JWG recusing Chief Judge Donald M. Haddock, (retired December 31, 2011) , Judge Lisa B. Kemler, Judge Nolan B. Dawkins. James Clark was sworn in on October 14, 2011 Plaintiff sends Letter to Judge Haddock in regards to his duty as a Judge and the rules of the Grand Jury, and that he had over-ruled Ed Semonian in his Duty as a Constitutional Officer. Also questioning Judge Haddocks retirement date and timing of Grand Jury. October 14, 2011 Plaintiff Letter to Randy Sengel in regard to Violation Plaintiffs rights.

    31 | The Appearance of Justice is as important as Justice itself

    1 2 3 4

    October 14, 2011 Randy Sengel answers Plaintiffs question about date of retirement of Judge Haddock ~ end of December 31, 2011 October 20, 2011 JWG files in the Eastern District Court of Virginia: Complaint-Conspiracy to interfere with the Civil Rights 18 USC 241 & 42 USC 1983 Illegal Actions to Deny Access to Grand Jury. Trial by Jury, & More Emergency Motion for injunctive Relief October 31, 2011 JWG Letter to Judge Lee RE- $

    November 9, 2011 - Fed Court


    6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

    Order Deny Request for in forma Pauperis due to claim is Frivolous

    November 16, 2011 Letter from the Circuit Court of Alexandria that the Supreme Court had conflicts with the date of December 12, 2011 due to schedule conflicts. November 21, 2011 Supreme Court Letter ~ Judge Potter to sit on Grand Jury of February 13, 2011 There is one matter, In Re: Grand Jury Request of Janice Wolk Grenadier, scheduled that the Judges have recused themselves from hearing. November 21, 2011 Order from the Supreme Court for Judge Potter to assist Alexandria Circuit Court November 21, 2011 JWG Learns about the Magistrate can also bring charges - Calls City of Alexandria Magistrate to learn that he requires a Police Report - JWG then calls Detective Pak to ask for Police Report # he ignores phone calls, e-mails when Plaintiff gets him on the phone first excuse is Computers are down, next excuse not to give me the number is he hasnt had time to look it up. When asked where Plaintiff can call to get it he sounds nervous on phone and tells Plaintiff he will get it for Plaintiff. Plaintiff leaves several messages etc.. to never hear back from Detective Pak. Plaintiff Calls Records in Alexandria to learn - There is no Police Report # for the Extortion investigation brought on by Randy Sengel commonwealths attorney which there is a letter from Ben DiMuro April 16, 2009 charging Plaintiff with acts of Extortion. Plaintiff believes there to be Collusion between Randy Sengel - Ben DiMuro to stop Plaintiff. November 23, 2011 JWG Files with Fed Court

    Petition for Reconsideration of the Frivolous Order of 9 November 2011 ComplaintConspiracy to Interfere with the Civil Rights 18 USC 241 & 42 ISC 1983 Illegal Actions to Deny Access to Grand Jury Trial By Jury December 9, 2011 Plaintiff goes to Richmond for The Courts of Justice are reviewing Judges that are up for renewal. Plaintiff learns Judge Lemons is going to be heard at 9 am. Plaintiff stands up and expresss to Courts of Justice the issues. That Judge Lemons along with the Supreme Court of Virginia have ignored the law. Judge Lemons goes on to explain it was timing. Plaintiff met all time requirements. It is clear the Judges of the Supreme Court of Virginia ignored the basic law of Virginia Code in making their decision on the appeal filed with them. On several occasions the Courts of Justice Members reminded Plaintiff if she had an issue she needed to go through her representative Patsy Ticer at which point Plaintiff reminded The Courts of Justice Patsy Ticers answer was Plaintiff needed to walk away the message was sent through Martha Kent Martha sat listened to Plaintiffs situation - Then explained to Plaintiff - She had walked in Plaintiff shoes understood Plaintiffs situation - she was the x-wife of a Judge She and her family members couldnt get a fair trial in Virginia - Plaintiff needed to drop this Plaintiff couldnt win and move on as Plaintiff had no Rights in Virginia-

    32 | The Appearance of Justice is as important as Justice itself

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

    December 20, 2011 Ms. Slaughter Federal Judge Bruce Lees Secretary lies to Plaintiff December 21,2011 File Motion to be heard in Federal Court January 6, 2012 - denied as Judge Lee is out of town? December 22, 2011 File in the Supreme Court of Virginia - Petition for Writ of Error Coram Vobis Alexandria Court Illegal Actions to Deny Citizen Right to Trial by Jury and Grand Jury January 4, 2012 Letter Randy Sengel Commonwealth Attorney to Judge Potter informing him to refuse JWG in front of the Grand Jury as Plaintiff is not one of his witnesss Plaintiff contacts Supreme Court regarding letter and informed anyone can write to a Judge Question: When Plaintiff wrote to the Chief Justice the letter was never given to him that Plaintiff had to write the Clerk of Court Patricia Harrington who ignored her. January 4, 2012 Letter from Meghan S. Roberts threatening Plaintiff with legal action over $200. For infractions of code a gutter & RV parked in my driveway. Collusion with Randy Sengel in attempt to scare/intimidate Plaintiff. January 7, 2012 Letter JWG to Meghan S. Roberts no intention of paying and reason why that she had spoken with the Code Enforcement and he had said to just call him when it was done. January 9, 2012 Letter to The Honorable Cynthia Kinser Chief Justice of the Virginia Supreme Court Plaintiff did not send after conversation with Doug Roublin that anyone can write a Judge a letter. The issue is back in the Circuit Court and must be dealt with in the Circuit Court. January 18, 2012 Motion for sanctions against Randy Sengel commonwealth attorney for letter to Judge Potter. January 18, 2012 Praecipe to be heard on January 25, 2012 January 20, 2012 Letter from Law Clerk Circuit Court of Alexandria that my Motion for Sanctions against Mr. Sengel would be heard by Judge Potter. Again the Circuit Court of Alexandria does not follow the rules or the laws of the court. Justice delayed is Justice denied. February 1, 2012 - Motion filed to demand Ed Semonian Clerk of Court answer simple questions about Grand Jury - Since Alexandria has shown in the past not to follow the rules of the courts It was reasonable for Plaintiff to ask basic questions which he refused to answer. Most likely he doesnt know the basic rules. February 1, 2012 - Parecipe filed on Feb 1 for Motion to be heard on February 8, 2012 by the new Judge - Judge Clark who had not recused himself from hearing this case. February 2, 2012 Letter Circuit Court of Alexandria Motion Sanctions against Ed Semonian to be heard at 9am February 13, 2012 by Judge Potter. February 7, 2012 Letter to Circuit Court Judges & Ed Semonian Plaintiff planed on being in court on February 8, 2012 that Judge Clark had not recused himself.

    33 | The Appearance of Justice is as important as Justice itself

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

    February 8, 2012 Judge Clark in court confirms he has not recused himself from the matter and that it isnt on his docket. Yet Judge Clark then turns and says yes I am going to hear this even though it is not on my docket. February 13, 2012 Kidnapping of JW in court room 4 from the Grand Jury Final Order by Judge Richard Potter - Denied in front of the Grand Jury he and Randy Sengel Commonwealth Attorney are now the Gate Keepers of the Grand Jury The Circuit Court of Alexandria after being disingenuous on October 11, 2012 held a Mickey Mouse type hearing on February 13, 2011 also called Kangaroo Court Judge Potter points out Plaintiff had not paid filing fees, yet Ed Semonian clerk of Court never sent a deficiency notice nor when Plaintiff made filings never asked for such fee. March 9, 2012 File Notice of Appeal Case # M011001482 March 9, 2012 Rick @ Neal R. Gross & Co., Inc informs Plaintiff she cant get access to transcripts without permission from Clerk of Court Lucy S. Plaintiff then has to Fax Neal R Gross copy of Appeal.

    ASSIGNMENT OF ERROR The Judges of the Circuit Court of Alexandria erred by failing to follow Va. Code 17.1105(b) after all judges recused themselves (or were required to recuse themselves) from this matter because of personal relationships between Defendants and the judges. Instead of having the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court appoint an out of Circuit Judge to hear the case, the Circuit Court of Alexandria (or its clerk), selected a judge themselves. Appellants motions challenging the appointment of the out of Circuit judges were denied and judgment ultimately entered against her. The Judges of the Circuit Court of Alexandria have now repeated there error on January 2012 & February 2012 by not having Judge James Clark hear Motions that Plaintiff had filed, but instead requested Judge Richard Bowen Potter who had been assigned by the Chief Justice to oversee Plaintiff going in front of the Grand Jury on February 13, 2012 not hearing Motions. This is a Miscarriage of Justice in error of impunity failing to find GIC/Ilona/David as culpable & guilty. All evidence showed GIC/Ilona/David to be culpable & guilty. Questions
    Question: Why didnt plaintiff go to Supreme Court a second time with an appeal? Because it was obvious that Supreme Court sent a very strong message to the Circuit Court Judges you do not have to follow the rules on two occasions now the Alexandria Circuit Court Judges decided outside there judicial power who would hear Motions that Plaintiff submitted. The Supreme Court then appointed a Judge who had questionable integrity. Who had in the past even though he knew forgery and had been committed by the DMV ruled in favor of the DMV. It has been made clear to Plaintiff the Judicial Network runs all the way up to the Supreme Court of Virginia. Justice Lemons said that Plaintiffs appeal had been denied over time. There is no statute of limitation on due process and a judges decision that is made when he has no jurisdiction that decision is Void. That the Defendants had been disingenuous in
    34 | The Appearance of Justice is as important as Justice itself

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

    there Motion that the Plaintiff had not filed a Statement of Facts was denied because Plaintiff had proven in Plaintiffs response that Ilona/David/Gic and their attorneys had been disingenuous with the Supreme Court of Virginia. This proves the Network that the Defendants attorneys are party to, control the outcome of the Supreme Court of Virginias approval or denial of an appeal. The Law in Virginia is decided on by the Old Boy Network / Judicial members not the United States Constitution, The Virginia Constitution, the Rules of the Supreme Court. Was this politically motivated? It is known Plaintiff is a Republican and from the articles in Exhibit 12 it is clear how the Democrats wanted to keep hold of Judge Nolan Dawkins appointment. That the Democrats want to keep a strong hold on the Judicial System in the State of Virginia. Question: How much has defendants donated to the political campaigns of Randy Sengel, Ed Semonian, Patsy Ticer, David Englin? Patsy Ticer openly helped fund raise and supported Ed Semonian even though she was aware of his illegal, unprofessional acts in his job. (Exhibit 24)

    Conclusion
    This is about the 28 East Bellefonte Ave, also about the Collusion through Defendants to have the judicial network prevent Plaintiff from her Religious, United States Constitutional, and Virginia Constitutional & Civil Rights. On several occasions Plaintiff said a mistake was made, lets fix it. The judicial network in Virginia in its cover up of this mistake and there favoritism to a widow of a past judge party to their judicial network. These men and women, along with Defendants have worked in collusion to Intimidate, Maliciously Manipulate Plaintiff using Scare Tactics, the Alexandria Police, and the Courts of Virginia, motivated by financial interests and cronyism. The judicial network lives in a world of its own in the State of Virginia. The difference is this Network in Virginia is a Gentlemens network so people dont look at it like the Mafia. The truth is they are no different, they hurt people, they protect their own. They believe they are above the law and to be in the Network you agree to protect those in the Network. Due process has no place in the Virginia Judicial Network. The Judicial system of Virginia is corrupt.
    Chief Justice John Roberts of the Supreme Court of the United States of America testified under oath that Judges are like umpires. Umpires dont make the rules, they apply them. The role of an umpire and a judge is critical. They make sure everybody plays by the rules, but it is a limited role. Nobody ever went to a ball game to see the umpire. Judges have to have the humility to recognize that they operate within a system of precedent shaped by other judges equally striving to live up to the judicial oath, and judges have to have the modesty to be open in the decisional process to the considered views of their colleagues on the bench.

    Plaintiff is not arguing her case in the Motion. Plaintiff a single mom, for this reason to protect herself and her girls has added the evidence usually found in discovery to assure that all reading this Motion will understand the depth of the Old Boy Network in Virginia and their
    35 | The Appearance of Justice is as important as Justice itself

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

    collusion, malicious manipulation and intimidation the power they wield. Plaintiff reserves the right to alter or amend Exhibits as Plaintiff believes with discovery will come more disclosure of Fraud. Exemplary Damages - Plaintiff is entitled to recover punitive damages. Plaintiff hereby makes a claim for exemplary damages because Defendants acted intentionally, willfully, wantonly, and maliciously to insure that Plaintiff did not get a fair trial. Defendants blatant abusive regard to the United States of America Constitution, Virginia Constitution, Civil Rights of Plaintiff, should be punished. Plaintiff respectfully requests an exemplary damage award against Defendants for Twenty Two Million Dollars ($ 22,000,000.). These damages should be awarded both as a punishment and to set a public example. The plaintiff suffered emotionally and financially as well has her children innocent victims. The acts of the Defendants are egregious and vicious actions against Plaintiff a pro se, single mom with her 2 girls because they are Catholic and are x communicated from the Old Boy Network. Defendant Ilona Ely Freedman Grenadier Heckman is a lawyer , officer of the court has abused her power, violated her oath, is guilty of malpractice.

    Relief Requested PRAYER


    Plaintiffs is entitled to recover for actual damages from 28 East Bellefonte Ave, along with the Return of the note Ilona and her law firm holds or compensation for such note and loss of clients due to her lies, attorneys fees, and cost of suit, loss of time, humiliation and emotional anguish force of emotional distress of the first trial, and now a second trial. The intentional infliction of emotional distress, that she has suffered severe permanent emotional injuries from the outrageous and intolerable actions of these Defendants. Issue other relief as this Court or Jury deems appropriate and just. Defendant demands a Trial by Jury, and Change of Venue.

    I RESPECTFULLY ASK FOR THIS

    Janice Wolk Grenadier 15 West Spring Street Alexandria, Virginia 22301 jwolkgrenadier@aol.com
    July 5, 2012 Certificate of Service
    I HERBY CERTIFY THAT a true and accurate copy of the Plaintiffs Motion to reopen case Fraud on the Court was hand delivered on July 5, 2012 to the following: Ilona Grenadier/ GIC /Grenadier, Anderson, Starace, Duffett & Kiesler PC to Ben Dimuro at DimuroGinsburg, 1101 King Street, Suite 610, Alexandria, VA 22314 & David Grenadier to Michael J. Weiser, 510 King St., Suite 416, Alexandria, VA 22314. Dated this July 5, 2012

    _________________________________ Janice Wolk Grenadier Pro Se

    36 | The Appearance of Justice is as important as Justice itself

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 37 | The Appearance of Justice is as important as Justice itself

    S-ar putea să vă placă și