Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Mailbag
Write to: letterschennai@ newindianexpress.com
Shankkar Aiyar, analyst and senior journalist on sabbatical, specialises in the interface of politics and economics. E-mail: shankkar.aiyar@gmail.com
worst terror attacks from the 1993 serial blasts of Mumbai to the 26/11 attacks are all privileged guests of Pakistan. Twenty-four terrorists most wanted by India from Dawood to Hafiz Saeed are roaming the streets of Quetta and Karachi, if not Islamabad. Pakistanis are victims, not Pakistan. Pretence No 4: Pakistan was not in the loop. The US has every reason to not trust the Pakistani establishment, particularly given the ISIs love for Laden. Yet the claims of both sides demand scepticism because truth is the first casualty of war. The outrage of the Pakistanis and the stealth of the operation could be part of a mutually convenient pact. The failure of Pakistani air space controllers, the absence of the legendary inner ring that protected Osama or how neither the civil police nor the military reacted to the 100-plus decibel clatter of four choppers beats imagination. Most likely Osama was offered as a trophy to the US. The quid pro we know, the quo we will discover soon enough. The killing of Osama is just one episode in a planned serial. The K factor of geopolitics will soon occupy prime time slots. Pretence No 5: US-Pak relations have worsened. From the deceitful rescue of Taliban terrorists by the ISI from Konduz in 2001 to the harbouring of Osama bin Laden 800 metres from the Pakistan Military Academy in 2011, Pakistan has alternately capitulated to and manipulated the US. Indeed what action did US take against Pakistan on nuclear proliferation that too to Pyongyang and Tehran? Perfidy is the cornerstone of this marriage of convenience. Pretence No 6: The US is now our Uncle
Sam. It is a delusion peculiar to India. From Kargil to Kandahar hijacking, from the attack on Parliament to 26/11, the United States has played nanny to Pakistan, intervening only to prevent retaliation by India. The mocking presence of Indias most wanted in Pakistan despite petitions to Washington is evidence of who is the favoured nephew. The expectation that NOW America will forsake Pakistan particularly when it needs Islamabad badly to engineer the good Taliban regime and pull out of Kabul betrays naivet. Pretence No 7: Dialogue must continue. Yes, but with whom and why. Is it because the US deigns it? Thirty months after 26/11 no perpetrator of the terror attack has been punished. Pakistan has failed to deliver what India wants and India will not deliver Pakistans dream. This will be a dialogue of the deaf. The theory of rogue elements may serve as diplomatic rouge but what is the worth of guarantees issued by a crashing bank? Aman ki Asha will need to be more than a man ki asha! Pretence No 8: Pakistani Army can deliver peace. For six decades and more Pakistan is ruled directly and by proxy by the Pakistani Military Industrial Complex. The war of a thousand cuts was crafted by and is perpetuated by Pakistani Army. The involvement of ISI and Pakistani Army in sponsoring terror is now well documented. And we still believe in the hypothesis of a peace loving Pakistani Army. Pretence No 9: India can execute surgical strikes. One hopes so. But let us not confuse capability with capacity. Indians in uniform are as brave as any. The state though has repeatedly displayed lack of capacity to take the call from Kandahar to Mumbai 2008. Provocation has been countered with pusillanimity. Pretence No 10: Peace can be won with moral indignation. Morality matters in war but so does action. Nations become superpowers by aligning, negotiating and fighting for their interests. The US is a superpower because it has repeatedly displayed the ability to walk its talk. Operation Geronimo could have failed, Obama could well have been the next Carter but he dared. To act. Playing the innocent victim has its limits.
opulation projections by the United Nations show that Indias population will peak at 1.718 billion in 2060, ie, 35 years after Chinas population would have peaked at 1.39 billion in 2025. By the turn of the century, Indias population would be double that of China. Today Indias median age is 25 years, lower than that of China, Africa and the developed world. But by the time India steps into the 22nd century, the average Indian would be older than the average person even in the developed world. If the present and future demographic figures are juxtaposed, it would evoke mixed reactions. Population can be seen both as an asset and a liability. It will be an asset, if India is able to provide the young and future generations opportunities for economic growth. This calls for setting up more schools and colleges, increasing food production and providing jobs. If, on the other hand, no planning is done, India will have the worlds largest, malnourished and illiterate population. Even today, over six decades after attaining Independence, the economic growth rate has made only a marginal impact on an overwhelming majority of the population, which survives on less than $2 a day. The UN projections should, therefore, be seen as a challenge to the planners and rulers. If China, which had the same kind of economic situation as India when the communists came to power in the mid-Forties, could achieve better results, there is no reason why India cant. It is also possible to halt the exponential growth in population by resorting to a mix of incentives and disincentives to popularise family planning. A study by the Asian Development Bank says 70 per cent of Indias population will be middle class within the next 15 years. In other words, it is within Indias capability to prove the present UN projections wrong by significantly curtailing population growth.
She wondered for whom were the advertiSementS for SareeS meant for
Regarding the photograph carried on page 11 (War on Terror) titled Front Row View on May 4, what struck me was the relatively insignificant position Obama was occupying in the Situation Room, when compared to that of US Secretary of Defence Robert Gates and others. This is a lesson for our leaders. The reins should be given to the right person at the right time. A good leader is a person who allows the system to function without putting a spoke in the wheel.
RAghU S E-mail
he Tamil Nadu governments refusal to adhere to the new norm of the All India Council for Technical Education on minimum marks for admission to engineering courses comes as no surprise. It was just last year the government relaxed the minimum marks, fixing it at 50 per cent for general category, 45 per cent for Backward Classes, 40 per cent for Most Backward Classes and 35 per cent for SC/ST students. Though the move was made out to be another effort aimed at upholding the avowed principle of social justice, the real reason was to enable private engineering colleges fill up their seats. It is an open secret that engineering seats are sold across the counter. The unchecked proliferation of engineering institutions in the state 471 colleges and 23 deemed universities last year has seen thousands of seats going unfilled in the past years. With many politicians owning colleges in the state, where running an education institution is a lucrative business for those with money and land to invest, a demand to bring down the minimum marks was raised, only to be readily accepted by the government. Now with the AICTE suddenly cracking the whip, the government quickly responded with a firm no, only to receive support from other political parties, which have conveniently raised the bogey of a possible miscarriage of social justice. It may be true that more students from marginalised communities could pursue engineering courses if minimum marks are lowered but going by the cut-off marks in the single window scheme of those who gained admission in government institutions in the past, students with low scores gain entry only in low end private colleges, lacking in basic infrastructure. Sure, it will help the college make money. But does that not make the social justice argument rather specious?
ished the programme. I am sure, the viewers noticed the change in my demeanour, but thought that the subject was too serious to permit a pleasant face. The sting, I found, is in the tail as I watched my hand growing in dimension as hours passed. Remedies were suggested by everyone who saw my hand or an image on facebook posted by me to alert the world about the hazards of broadcasters. These ranged from taking an ant-histamine tablet (which is what I did on my way back from the studio) to going to a doctor immediately for an injection.. Home remedies like rubbing shallot juice, warm salt water, turmeric paste and lime juice were suggested. The most
It is unfortunate that in spite of the Delhi High Court restraints and summons issued for contempt of court orders, the Indian Commercial Pilots Association is continuing its stir which bleeds the debtridden national carrier `30 crore/day. The ministry of civil aviation should take stern steps. Simultaneously, the government should ensure that private operators do not take advantage of the situation by hiking their fares.
R SEKAR E-mail