Criteria Knowledge Understanding of CorelDRAW tools

Level 3 Level 2 Level 1 understands understands understands the use and the use and the use and purpose of purpose of purpose of a most of the some of the few of the tools tools tools Thinking always uses usually uses sometimes rarely uses decisions on tools effectively tools effectively uses tools tools effectively which tool to use for effect for effect effectively for for effect based on required required effect required required instructions Communication rich insights some insights few insights are no insights are insights learned are learned are learned learned during learned during during and after during and during and and after the and after the the activity after the after the activity activity activity activity Application does all tasks needs little needs a lot of needs a great independently independently help from peers help from peers deal of help performs tasks or instructor or instructor from peers or instructor Timeliness submitted by submitted by submitted by submitted submitted by due date no more than more than 24 more than 2 stated due date 24 hours after hours after days after the deadline deadline deadline AVERAGE LEVEL:
Retrieved from http://school.bayridge.tripod.com/TGJ2O/Introduction/rubric_for_project.htm (9 September 2012). Modified by Marlon L. Lalaguna (9 September 2012).

Level 4 understands the use and purpose of all tools

AVERAGE LEVEL AND INTERPRETATION

Level 1 100 % Level 2 90% Level 3 80% Level 4 70% Congratulations for an EXCELLENT CorelDRAW output! Very Good CorelDRAW output! Satisfactory output Sorry your output needs an improvement

Category

Description

Point Value

Well-written and well-organized 2 POINTS Mechanics Well written, clear organization, uses Inadequate due to lack of organization, grammar, and/or standard English grammar, contains minor, major spelling errors 1 POINT if any, spelling errors MECHANICS TOTAL Demonstrates critical thinking and the ability to apply Evidence of Critical Thinking Critical thinking includes application, concepts. 3 POINTS analysis, synthesis and evaluation. Demonstrates some critical thinking and application of Arguments are clear and show depth of concepts 2 POINTS insight into theoretical issues, originality Shows minor or incorrect application of concepts of treatment, and relevance. May include 1 POINT unusual insights. Arguments are well supported. CRITICAL THINKING TOTAL Well-developed; shows evidence of reflection and/or Development of Ideas Well-developed thoughts, ideas, and metacognition; new ideas introduced and reflects a good details, which shows evidence of grasp of concepts presented. 3 POINTS reflection, new ideas, and grasp of Shows some evidence of reflection, but not wellconcepts. developed; few new ideas introduced but reflects a grasp of concepts presented. 2 POINTS Not much thought or detail; shows little evidence of reflection or grasp of concepts; no new ideas introduced. 1 POINT DEVELOPMENT OF IDEAS TOTAL Submitted by deadline 2 POINTS Timeliness Submitting by stated due date Submitted no more than 24 hours after deadline 1 POINT Submitted more than 24 hours after deadline or not submitted O POINT TIMELINESS TOTAL

/2

/3

/3

/2

OVERALL TOTAL POINTS FOR REFLECTION JOURNAL

Rubric Retrieved from http://people.richland.edu/fbrenner/syllabus/reflectrubric.html

/10

CUMULATIVE POINTS AND INTERPRETATION

10 8-9 6-7 4-5 0-3 100 % 90% 85% 75% 70% Excellent Reflective Journal Very Good Reflective Journal Good Reflective Journal Fair Reflective Journal Sorry your Reflective Journal needs an improvement