Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Reliance Infrastructure
(RELI IN)
Utilities: India
6-mth rating:
Jaideep Goswami
(91) 22 6622 1010 jaideep.goswami@in.daiwasmbc.com
Jonas Bhutta
(91) 22 6622 1008 jonas.bhutta@in.daiwasmbc.com
Saurabh Mehta
(91) 22 6622 1009 saurabh.mehta@in.daiwasmbc.com
Market data
SENSEX Index Market cap EV 3-mth avg daily T/O Shares outstanding Free float Major shareholder Exchange rate Performance (%)* Absolute Relative
Source: Daiwa Note: *Relative to SENSEX Index
Investment indicators
PER PCFR EV/EBITDA PBR Dividend yield ROE ROA Net debt equity
Source: Daiwa forecasts
Source: Company, Daiwa forecasts Note: The investment indicators and income summary on the front page of this report, as well as the back-page financial summary, are all based on the forex assumptions set out in the table at the back of this report, unless stated otherwise.
IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES, INCLUDING ANY REQUIRED RESEARCH CERTIFICATIONS, ARE PROVIDED ON THE LAST TWO PAGES OF THIS REPORT.
Contents
Investment summary .........................................................................................................3 Transitioning from pure utility to an infrastructure conglomerate ...................................5 Reliance Power is the key valuation driver.......................................................................6 Valuation...........................................................................................................................8 What would drive the stock up or down? .........................................................................9 Generation assets and the Mumbai licence area .............................................................10 Delhi distribution area.....................................................................................................12 Transmission projects .....................................................................................................13 EPC division revenue CAGR of 40% for FY10-12E .....................................................14 Roads...............................................................................................................................16 Metro-rail projects early-mover advantage..................................................................18 Reliance Power 33.74GW of projects in the pipeline..................................................21 Implementation holds the key.........................................................................................22 Valuations .......................................................................................................................24 Appendix I update on Reliance Power projects...........................................................26
Reliance Infrastructure
Investment summary
We initiate coverage of RELI with a 3 rating as: 1) We believe the macro outlook is positive for the power and infrastructure sectors in terms of emerging opportunities, the governments renewed focus on infrastructure, and the improvement in the availability of credit. We believe RELI is well-positioned to benefit from these factors, given what we see as its strong balance sheet and management experience. 2) The companys core generation and distribution business is regulated, so we believe its profit may not increase significantly in the near future. 3) We forecast EPC revenue to increase at a CAGR of 40% for FY10-12, with an EBITDA margin of 8% over the period. However, we do not expect the EPC business to contribute significantly to our SOTP valuation. 4) Most of the projects of RPWR, which accounts for 42% of our SOTP valuation for RELI, are at an early stage of execution. We think these projects are unlikely to contribute meaningfully to earnings before FY12. 5) We think the asset-ownership businesses power-transmission and infrastructure projects, such as roads, airports, and metro systems have huge long-term potential. However, most of these businesses are at the investment phase currently. Hence, we do not expect them to boost earnings or return ratios in the near term. 6) The main earnings driver in the past has been treasury income, which we expect to decline due to the increase in investments in assets. 7) The improving visibility with regards to financial closure and the execution of infrastructure and RPWR projects should be positive triggers for the stock, in our opinion. 8) We see the most important near-term catalyst as a favourable verdict in the KG Basin gas case.
Valuation
We have a SOTP-based six-month target price of Rs1,029 for RELI. We value the power business (including RPWR) and the infrastructure business on a DCF-toequity basis, the EPC business on an EV/EBITDA basis, and net cash and equivalent at book value. We value the power-generation assets, the Mumbai licence area and the Delhi distribution area on a DCF basis, with a value of Rs234/share, assuming a cost of equity (CoE) of 13% and a terminal growth rate of 2%. We value the EPC division using a target EV/EBITDA multiple of 9x on our FY11 forecasts, giving a value of Rs159/share. We value the infrastructure asset-ownership projects, including five road projects and metro-system projects, at Rs83/share on an NPV basis at a CoE of 15%. We value RELIs stake in RPWR at Rs425/share on a free-cash-flow to equity basis, using a CoE of 15% and applying a holding-company discount of 20%. We value the net cash and equivalent at book value, at Rs122/share.
Reliance Infrastructure
Reliance Infrastructure
RELI restructured all of its businesses recently under separate subsidiaries. We believe this will enable each business to focus on rapid growth, and we expect major value to be unlocked from these subsidiaries in the future by listing the stocks.
Bidding aggressively for projects
RELI is bidding for projects across various businesses. In distribution, it is bidding for franchisee licences for cities in Bihar, Madhya Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh and Maharashtra. It is also bidding actively for transmission and infrastructure projects, such as roads, airports, and metros. Funding these projects would not be an issue for RELI, in our opinion. RELI plans to raise Rs42.9bn through an equity issuance priced at Rs1,000/share by allotting 42.9m warrants to the promoters. As per Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) guidelines, RELI will receive 25% of the amount (Rs10.72bn) on allotment, while the balance will be received upon conversion of the warrants. We believe this plan to issue equity should be viewed positively, as it would allow the company to bid for additional infrastructure and power projects, and enhance its borrowing capability.
Incremental equity capex (Rs m)
FY09 Power Western Region Strengthening Scheme Parbati-Koldam Transmission Project Mumbai Strengthening Scheme Infrastructure projects DS Toll NK Toll TK Toll TD Toll SU Toll Mumbai Metro One Airport Metro Express Link , Delhi Gurgaon Faridabad Road Project Total investments Source: Company, Daiwa forecasts 52 1,000 52 45 57 45 84 1,725 3,060 FY10E 1,000 563 5,100 1,331 992 1,931 1,820 6,491 16 19,244 FY11E 3,200 788 5,400 1,575 2,164 562 13,688 FY12E 848 3,800 842 5,490
RELI needs to put in equity capex of Rs19.24bn in FY10 and Rs13.69bn in FY11 for the existing projects
Infrastructure projects do not contribute currently to RELIs revenue or profit. However, RELI has been making steady progress with the urban infrastructure projects that it has undertaken. The five road projects (401km in Tamil Nadu [TN]) have achieved financial closure, and management guides for two of these projects to be commissioned by 3Q FY10. Mumbai Metro One (MMO) and Airport Metro Express Link (AMEL) have achieved financial closure, and are scheduled to be commissioned by 3Q FY11. However, the execution risk remains, and we have yet to see of any of these projects being completed or cash flow start to flow in, so until that happens we would not be confident about the value-accretion capabilities of the projects.
Potential value creation
We believe RELIs asset-ownership business has huge long-term potential. Most of these businesses, however, are at the investment phase currently. Hence, these businesses would not boost earnings or return ratios in the near term. Significant upside from such investments is only likely to become apparent from FY12 onwards, in our opinion.
Jaideep Goswami (91) 22 6622 1010
Reliance Infrastructure
(MW) 35,000 30,000 25,000 20,000 15,000 10,000 5,000 0 300 Jan-10 300 Jan-11 Jan-12 Jan-13 Jan-14 Jan-15 Jan-16 Jan-17 6,140 9,920 32,520 6,580 3,880 2,900
30% of RPWRs planned capacity is based on obtaining a supply of gas from the KG D6 field owned by Reliance Industries (RIL) (RIL IN, Rs1,974.3, 3). This matter is before the courts at the moment. Policy proposals by the India Government regarding the supply of gas and an unfavorable outcome in the court case add to the implementation risk for the 10.28GW power plant, in our opinion.
Implementation holds the key
Timely execution of these projects would be the biggest challenge, in our view, while delays with obtaining clearances either environmental or forestry could cause problems. In any event, we believe these proposed projects are unlikely to contribute meaningfully to RELIs earnings before FY12.
However, recent initiatives by the government could aid project implementation
The India Governments renewed focus on accelerating the land-acquisition process, allowing faster clearance from the environmental and forestry departments, and encouraging private participation in coal extraction augurs well for future infrastructure projects, in our opinion. Also, the easier availability of credit through agencies, such as India Infrastructure Finance Company Limited (IIFCL) and Power Finance Company (PFC), should facilitate the financial closure of mega projects. All of these government initiatives should really help with the implementation of these projects, in our opinion, and be a significant positive for RPWR.
Reliance Infrastructure
We need to monitor the progress of these projects closely. RPWR plans to commission its first plant (Rosa I) by the end of FY10. Timely completion of this project would instil a lot of confidence in managements ability to execute projects on time. Also doubts about the functioning of China-made equipment in an Indian environment could be laid to rest with the smooth operation of Rosa 1. RPWR plans to use main plant packages (boiler, turbine and generator) from equipment suppliers in China for most of its capacity.
Reliance Infrastructure
Valuation
We have a SOTP-based six-month target price of Rs1,029 for RELI. We value the power business (including RPWR) and the infrastructure business on a DCF-toequity basis (to reflect what we see as the true long-term value of these longgestation-period projects), the EPC business on an EV/EBITDA basis, and net cash and equivalent at book value. We value the power-generation assets, the Mumbai licence area and Delhi distribution area on a DCF basis, arriving at a value of Rs234/share, assuming a CoE of 13% (based on the low-risk nature of the business) and a terminal growth rate of 2% (in line with the low-growth profile of the utility business). We value the EPC division using a target EV/EBITDA multiple of 9x on our FY11 forecasts, giving a value of Rs159/share. This multiple represents a 20% discount to Larsen & Toubros (LT) (LT IN, Rs1,482, 3) E&C divisions multiple of 11.2x on our FY11 forecasts. Our target multiple takes into account the companys lack of an execution history for large projects. The five road projects are valued at Rs46/share on an NPV basis at a CoE of 15%. The metro-rail projects are valued at Rs37/share on an NPV basis at a CoE 15%. We value RELIs stake in RPWR at Rs425/share on a free-cash-flow to equity basis using a CoE of 15%, and applying a holding-company discount of 20%. We value the net cash and equivalent at book value, at Rs122/share.
SOTP methodology
Business Generation and Mumbai licence area Delhi distribution area WRSS EPC Roads Mumbai Metro Delhi Metro RPWR Net cash and equivalent
Source: Company, Daiwa forecasts
Equity value (Rs bn) 42.6 20.6 1.3 35.9 10.4 5.8 4.5 266.1 27.6
Stake Value/share (%) (Rs) Remarks 100 189 DCF at CoE of 13% and TV of 2% 49 45 DCF at CoE of 13% and TV of 2% 100 6 NPV at CoE of 15% 100 159 EV/EBITDA of 9x, discount of 20% to LT 100 46 NPV at CoE of 15% 69 18 NPV at CoE of 15% 95 19 NPV at CoE of 15% DCF at CoE of 15%, TV of 2.5%, and 45 425 holding-company discount of 20% 122 Book value Total 1,029
Reliance Infrastructure
RELI is bidding for distribution franchisee licences for various cities in Bihar, Madhya Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh and Maharashtra. RELI is also actively bidding for transmission and infrastructure projects in the road, airport, and metro sectors. While we believe winning these projects would provide a short-term boost for sentiment toward RELIs share price, the real value would not materialise until there is clarity on the value-accretion potential from such projects. We need to see that RELI is not compromising on returns when bidding aggressively for these projects. In the same way, achieving financial closure for these projects would be positive for the stock, in our opinion. RPWR projects account for 69% of RELIs EPC order book. Hence, timely execution of such projects would boost RELIs EPC revenue and enhance the value of RPWR. RELI has created a subsidiary special-purpose-vehicle structure for each business segment. We believe there is a strong possibility that the value of these could be unlocked through initial public offers and listing of some of these subsidiaries in the future. Any adverse development in the RIL-RNRL court case would put 10.28GW of gas-based planned capacity additions at risk. This equates to 30.46% of RPWRs total planned power-generation capacity. RELI has receivables worth Rs10.34bn (Rs46/share) and made up of the revenue gap and FAC from the Mumbai licence area. In our view, further deferment of collections may put a strain on RELIs cash flow. Delays with the implementation of projects by RPWR, or any negative news flow relating to equipment supply or delays in receiving clearances would have a very negative impact on the stock, in our view.
Reliance Infrastructure
Sourcing of power
RELI has issued a tender for medium-term power procurement with a tenure of three-to-five years, which, if it goes ahead, would be the industrys first mediumterm power-procurement agreement. First, the issuance of the tender is in accordance with prevailing regulatory norms, which mandate procuring power for more than a year, and only through a bidding process. Second, the cost of power purchased through the power-purchase agreement would be lower than the Rs7-8 RELI spends when purchasing through bilateral contracts.
Sources of power procurement for distribution in the Mumbai licence area
Sourcing of power from bilateral contracts has risen significantly to 30%, as has the overall tariff for retail customers
(%) 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 FY 07 Dahanu Tata Power FY08 Spot/UI FY09 Dahanu FY10E Tata Power
(Rs) 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Spot/UI
The distribution, transmission and generation of power are all regulated businesses in the Mumbai licence area, with all fixed and variable costs passed on to the consumer. However, in any given year, the increase in tariff for the consumer cannot be more than 10%. The remaining amount is carried forward to the next year, with an interest rate of 10% applied to the amount deferred.
resulting in regulatory assets
RELI has Rs10.34bn of regulatory assets in the power business resulting from the revenue gap and FAC. The revenue gap the gap between the actual cost and what has been approved by the regulator in the form of tariffs is Rs3.56bn. The FAC of Rs6.78bn was due to an increase in the cost of fuel, which was not recovered in FY09, but would be recoverable through future tariff determination. These regulatory assets are a cause for concern, in our opinion.
Reliance Infrastructure
10
Open access
Open access gives a distribution licencee the right to supply power and the consumer the right to receive power from an available distribution player. In the Mumbai licence area, RELI faces competition from Tata Power with regards to distributing power. TPWR can use RELIs existing transmission network by paying a wheeling charge determined by the regulator. TPWR also plans to set up a parallel network, and extend its network to areas where there are none currently. TPWR proposes to incur Rs10bn of capex over next 12 months, which would require prior approval of the regulator. We believe that the above would have no impact on RELI in the near term. However, over the medium term, if RELI is not able to reduce the tariff, it would face the risk of consumers in the licence area shifting to TPWR.
Generation assets
Steady cash flow from 941MW with longterm contracts, but no upside potential, in our view RELI has a total generation capacity of 941MW Dahanu (500MW), Samalkot 220 (MW), Goa (48MW), Kerala (165MW) and wind-farm projects in Karnataka (7.6MW). All of these generation plants have signed long-term power-purchase agreements. All these generation assets come under the purview of the regulatory agencies, with returns on base equity regulated, and all fixed and variable costs passed on to consumers. They generate steady cash flow, and none of these plants have any capex plans for the next two-to-three years. Hence, we do not expect any increase in the regulated equity or eventual increase in returns.
Forecast horizon PV of terminal value Equity value Shares outstanding (m) Equity value per share (Rs)
Source: Daiwa forecasts
Reliance Infrastructure
11
RELI has reduced the AT&C loss dramatically over the past seven years for BRPL, from 47.4% in FY03 to 20.6% in FY09, and for BYPL, from 61.9% in FY03 to 22% in FY09. We expect the decline in AT&C losses to drive earnings growth in the future, by means of incentives for achieving target AT&C-loss reductions in the multi-year tariff (MYT) given by the Delhi Electricity Regulatory Commission (DERC).
Target AT&C losses (%)
According to the MYT, these targets are given to earn incentives over the regulated return
BRPL BYPL
Source: Company, DERC, Daiwa
Valued at Rs20.60bn
RELI earns a regulated return of 16% from the distribution business, as well as incentives for reducing AT&C losses. We use a free-cash-flow to equity method to value the business, with assumptions of a CoE of 13%, and a terminal growth rate of 2% to factor in our expectation of low and stable long-term growth.
DCF of Delhi distribution area (Rs m)
PAT Depreciation Capex FCF Discount rate (%) PV of cash flow Forecast horizon PV of terminal value Equity value Shares outstanding (m) Equity value per share (Rs) RELI's stake (%) RELI's value per share (Rs)
Source: Company, Daiwa forecasts
FY10E 2,040 2,085 (2,500) 1,625 100 1,625 7,994 12,606 20,600 225 91 49 45
Reliance Infrastructure
12
Transmission projects
Western Region Strengthening Scheme (WRSS)
RELI was awarded the WRSS project by Power Grid Corporation of India (PGCIL) on a build-own-operate (BOO) basis. We estimate the total project cost to be Rs14bn. RELI achieved financial closure in May 2009, at a gearing of 4x. The project involves the construction of two sets of transmission lines one of 2,317 circuit kilometres (ckm) and the other of 967ckm. Approval to acquire rights of way has been obtained, along with all the regulatory clearances necessary to commence the projects. Design, engineering and testing activities for 90% of the towers have been completed. The project has a concession period of 25 years, and is likely to be commissioned by 3Q FY11.
Debt:equity 80 : 20 70 : 30 70 : 30
We value the transmission projects on an NPV basis, with a CoE assumption of 15%. Based on our assumptions, we value the WRSS project at Rs1.25bn. We have not assigned any value to PKTP, given the risk of delays with the construction of generation projects and financial closure of the transmission projects.
Reliance Infrastructure
13
Order from Sasan alone accounts for more than 60% of the order book
Hisar 8% Parichha 1% WRSS 6%
Butibori 7%
Sasan 62%
Source: Company
RPWR has a pipeline of 33.74GW of projects. Of that, RPWR has placed EPC orders for about 5.4GW (RELI has obtained about 4.26GW of orders). Hence, we believe there is a strong likelihood of a large order-book inflow from RPWR. We believe RPWR is in the process of placing EPC orders for the Krishnapatnam project (6 x 660MW) with RELI, which should flow into the order book between 2Q and 3Q FY10. Other possible orders that might be given to RELI include the Chitrangi project (6 x 660MW) in 4Q FY10, and the Tilaya project (6 x 660MW) in FY11. There is also the possibility of 4,000MW of further capacity being added close to Tilaya, with the availability of additional coal from the Kerendhari B and C blocks of the North Karanpura mines with geological reserves of 1,028m tonnes. This would also result in potential order inflow for RELI in FY12.
Projected order-book Inflow from RPWR
We believe the order book for RELIs EPC division would exceed Rs450bn in FY11, which represents strong revenue visibility
Managements guidance for sales growth for the EPC division of a 40-50% CAGR over the next three-to-four years looks quite achievable, in our view, given the strong order-book backlog. We have assumed a CAGR of 40% for the value of contracts billed from FY10 to FY12.
Reliance Infrastructure
14
(Rs bn) 75 65 55 45 35 25 15 5
EPC revenue
% 40
GR CA
Jan-04
Jan-05
Jan-06
Jan-07
Jan-08
Jan-09
Jan-10
Jan-11
Jan-12
Our assumption of an 8% EBITDA margin is based on two major premises: 1) the company outsources the main plant and the balance of plant contracts, and 2) all the projects in the order book are fixed-price contracts. The fixed-priced contracts are exposed to raw-material price risks, as these EPC projects have long gestation periods. Management focuses on project management, and outsources the main plant and balance of plant packages to third parties. Hence, we believe an 8% EBITDA margin is sustainable. Our assumption represents a 300-350 basis-point discount to LTs EBITDA margins of 11-11.5%.
Margin comparison with LT
(%) 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 FY03 FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09E FY10E FY11E FY12E EBITDA margins RELI
Source: Company, Daiwa forecasts
EBITDA margins LT
Valuation
We value the EPC division at an EV/EBITDA multiple of 9x on our FY11 forecasts, giving a value of Rs159/share. This multiple represents a 20% discount to the one we apply to LTs E&C division (11.2x on our FY11 forecasts). Our target multiple takes into account RELIs lack of an execution history with large projects.
Valuation of the EPC business
FY11 EPC EBITDA EV/EBITDA multiple of LT (x) Discount rate (%) Target EV/EBITDA multiple (x) EV for EPC (Rs m) Shares outstanding (m) Equity value per share (Rs) Source: Company, Daiwa forecasts 4,008 11.2 20 9.0 35,915 225 159
Reliance Infrastructure
15
Roads
Asset owner of 401 km at advanced stages of construction
These projects are parts of important inter-state and intra-state national highways RELI owns the assets of five BOT toll-road projects located in TN with a total length of 401 km. These projects were granted on concessions from the National Highway Authority of India (NHAI). The average concession period for all these projects is 25 years. RELI has achieved financial closure for all of the projects and, on average, has received grants of 25% for all of them involving a total capex of Rs31.58bn. For the NK Toll and DS Toll projects, construction work has been completed and they are ready to collect tolls. The other three projects (TK Toll, TD Toll and SU Toll) are all at advanced stages of construction, and are scheduled to be completed by 2Q FY11. Each of the five projects originates or passes through an important industrial town in TN. In our view, this should ensure strong traffic growth in the future.
Road-project details
Projects NK Toll DS Toll TK Toll TD Toll SU Toll Share (%) 100 100 100 100 100 Basis BOT toll BOT toll BOT toll BOT toll BOT toll Concession period Status Capital cost (Rs m) Debt:equity:grant (%) (years) Length (km) 20 44 Completed 3,450 80:13:07 20 53 Completed 4,150 80:13:07 30 80 Construction 7,550 61:19:20 30 88 Construction 5,600 40:19:41 25 136 Construction 10,830 47:20:33
RELI has received another BOT toll-based road project in the Delhi NCR region totalling 66 km, with a concession period of 17 years. The total capex required is Rs7.8bn. The project is at an early stage, and management expects to achieve financial closure by 2Q FY10. RELI has emerged as the L1 bidder for the Western Freeway Sealink, and is awaiting the letter of allotment (LOA). The project capex is Rs34bn. RELI has also emerged as a preferred bidder for the Eastern Peripheral Expressway, where the capex is estimated at Rs35bn. A further three road projects worth Rs135bn are in the pipeline and are awaiting requests for proposal (RFP).
Five road projects valued at Rs46 per share
Assumptions for road projects
Parameters Capital cost (Rs m) Debt:equity:grant (%) Base-year traffic (PCUs) YoY growth (%) Base-year toll (Rs/PCU) YoY growth (%) O&M expenses (% of capex) Interest rates Commissioning date (COD)
Source: Company, Daiwa forecasts
We value the five road projects in TN involving the construction of 401 km at Rs46/share on an NPV basis at a CoE of 15%.
Reliance Infrastructure
16
Road valuations are very sensitive to the traffic assumptions. For every 100 basispoint decline in the traffic assumption, the value decreases by 20%, and similarly, with every increase of 100 basis points in the CoE, the value increases by 23%. We have not assigned any value to the Delhi NCR region project, as it is still at an early stage and has not yet achieved financial closure.
Reliance Infrastructure
17
The total project cost for developing the rails is Rs24bn, of which the Maharashtra State Government will provide Rs6.4bn in the form of VGF. RELI obtained financial closure for the project in October 2008, with IDBI bank as the lead banker.
Reliance Infrastructure
18
Financial structure
VGF 28%
Equity 22%
The main revenue stream for the project is fares. The base revenue set in FY04 was Rs6 for <= 3 km, Rs8 for >3 & <= 8 km, and Rs10 for >8 km, with an increase of 11% every fourth year. The other revenue stream would be commercial rents that the company gets to develop as part of the concession. Each of the 12 stations has 1,000 sq m of area to develop around the station. The third revenue stream is advertising space on the railway platform and within the train carriages.
Likely to be commissioned by 2Q FY11
The MMO project was awarded in March 2007. Since then, all of the major contracts for rolling stock, signalling, traction, and power supply have been awarded. The consortium possesses about 80% of the rights of way required. A prototype car body has been manufactured successfully, and delivery of the first rolling stock is scheduled for 3Q FY10. Foundation work for viaducts, stations and depots has almost been completed. Foundation work for the Western Express Highway Special Bridge and Mithi River Special Bridge is in progress. The project is scheduled to be completed by September 2010, and has a concession period of 35 years (including the construction period).
AMEL, Delhi
The AMEL project is a metro-rail line linking New Delhi Railway Station and New Delhi International Airport. This is the first high-speed airport link of its kind in the country, connecting the airport with the central railway station. The project was awarded through an international competitive bidding process on a PPP basis to a RELI-led consortium. RELI holds a 95% stake, while remaining 5% is held by CAF (Spain). The 23-km long rail project will have six stations along the route: New Delhi, Shivaji Stadium, Dhaula Kuan, NH-8, IGI Airport and Dwarka. Of the six stations, five would be underground, and only the Dhaula Kuan station would be elevated. It would have an initial capacity of 15,000 passengers per day, which will be expanded gradually to 75,000 passengers per day by increasing the frequency of trains.
Project funding with a gearing of 2.33x
The total project cost for developing the network is Rs28.8bn. RELI obtained financial closure for the project in February 2009, with Axis bank as the lead banker. RELI has funded the project with an equity contribution of Rs7.5bn.
Reliance Infrastructure
19
The main revenue stream is fares. The basic pricing is Rs30 for <=3 km, Rs150 for <=17-18 km, and Rs180 for >=18, with an increase based on the Wholesale Price Index (WPI) every second year. The other revenue stream would be commercial rents for areas that the company gets to develop as part of the concession. The five stations have a total of about 59,000 sq m of area that can be developed around the stations. The third revenue stream is advertising space on the railway platform and within the carriages of the trains.
Likely to be commissioned by 2Q FY11
The project is progressing well, with most of the contracts for rolling stock, signalling, traction, and power supply having been awarded. Definitive designs for all systems have also been finalised. System-wide installation activity has commenced. The project is scheduled to be completed by 2Q FY11, before the Commonwealth Games, and has a concession period of 30 years (including the construction period).
Valuations of metro projects
MMO: assumptions
Tariff <= 3 km > 3 & <= 8 km > 8 km Tariff revision As on FY04 (Rs) As on FY11 (Rs) 6.0 7.4 8.0 9.9 10.0 12.3 11% every fourth year Base (m) 22 164 33 FY18-22 6 6 6 FY23-end 5 5 5
AMEL: assumptions
Tariff <=17-18 km >=18 <=3 km Tariff revision As on FY11 (Rs) 150 180 30 7% every two years Base (m) 4.1 1.1 0.3 FY18-22 12 12 12 FY23-end 10 10 10
Passenger traffic (m) Concentration (%) <= 3 km 10 > 3 & <= 8 km 75 > 8 km 15 Traffic growth (%) <= 3 km > 3 & <= 8 km > 8 km FY12-17 11 11 11
Passenger traffic (m) Concentration (%) <=17-18 km 75 >=18 20 <=3 km 5 Traffic growth (%) <=17-18 km >=18 <=3 km FY12-17 18 18 18
We value the metro-rail projects at Rs37/share on an NPV basis at a CoE 15%. The discount rate factors in the construction and operational risks that the project carries. We have not assigned any value to the Mumbai Metro 2 project, as it is still at a nascent stage, and not yet achieved financial closure.
Reliance Infrastructure
20
Type Coal Imported coal Coal Coal Imported coal Coal Coal
Configuration (units) 2 x 300MW 6 x 660MW 6 x 660MW 6 x 660MW 2 x 300MW 2 x 600MW 2 x 300MW 6 x 660MW 2 x 1,400MW 5 x 1,400MW + 480MW 4 x 100MW 4 x 175MW 4 x 250MW 8 x 150MW n.a. n.a. n.a.
Gas
Capacity (MW) 600 3,960 3,960 3,960 600 1,200 600 3,960 18,840 2,800 7,480 10,280 400 700 1,000 1,200 420 500 400 4,620 33,740
Location Uttar Pradesh Madhya Pradesh Andhra Pradesh Jharkhand Uttar Pradesh Maharashtra Maharashtra Madhya Pradesh Maharashtra Uttar Pradesh Uttarkhand Arunachal Pradesh Arunachal Pradesh Arunachal Pradesh Arunachal Pradesh Arunachal Pradesh Arunachal Pradesh
Reliance Infrastructure
21
x x x x x x
We set out details of these projects and milestones achieved to date in Appendix I.
Reliance Infrastructure
22
FY13E 600 3,960 1,600 600 1,200 300 2,800 5,600 16,660
FY14E 600 3,960 4,000 600 1,200 300 1,980 2,800 7,800 23,240
FY15E 600 3,960 4,000 800 600 1,200 300 3,960 2,800 7,800 400 700 27,120
FY16E 600 3,960 4,000 2,400 600 1,200 300 3,960 2,800 7,800 400 700 1,000 300 30,020
FY17E 600 3,960 4,000 4,000 600 1,200 300 3,960 2,800 7,800 400 700 1,000 1,200 32,520
Power offtake
Industries 1%
Merchant power
23%
Case II bids
37%
Case I bids
31%
Reliance Infrastructure
23
Valuations
RELI has a 45% stake in RPWR, which accounts for 42% of our SOTP valuation for RELI. Thus, RPWRs DCF-based fair value would be the main driver of RELIs valuations. We prefer to use a DCF valuation for RPWR, rather than the market price, as the true determinant of its fair value. Currently, RPWRs business is at the execution phase, and a DCF would reflect its true long-term value, in our opinion.
Assumptions
Our assumptions for capital costs, operational efficiency and revenue are mostly in line with managements assessment. We have adopted slightly higher capital-cost assumptions than management, and our operational assumptions are better than management has guided for. We assume a higher plant load factor (PLF) and lower operation and maintenance (O&M) costs, after looking at the performance of RELIs generation station at Dahanu, which has performed consistently over the past five years at a PLF of 100%, and where O&M costs are much lower than the industry average.
Capital-cost and operational assumptions
Project Rosa I Sasan Krishnapatnam Tilaya Rosa II Shahpur Butibori MPPL Shahpur (gas) Dadri Urthing Sobla Tato II Siyom Kalai Amulin Emini Mithudon Cost Cost (Rs bn) (Rs m)/MW Gearing 27 45.0 80:20 194 49.0 75:25 168 42.4 70:30 165 41.7 75:25 27 45.1 70:30 50 42.0 75:25 14 46.8 80:20 166 42.0 70:30 84 30.0 75:25 224 30.0 70:30 21 52.0 70:30 40 57.8 70:30 58 57.8 70:30 73 60.8 70:30 Station heat rate (kcal/kWh) 2,200 4,700 2,100 2,380 2,200 2,100 4,638 2,050 1,650 1,650 n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. Price coal/gas Calorific value (Rs/t) or gas (kcal/kg for O&M (US$/mmbtu) coal & kcal/scm for gas) PLF (%) (Rs m/MW) 1,640 4,000 90 1.5 315 4,700 90 1.5 2,400 4,200 90 1.5 315 4,700 90 1.5 1,640 4,000 90 1.5 3,390 4,200 90 1.5 1,150 4,638 90 1.5 500 4,000 90 1.5 5.42 8,100 90 0.6 5.42 8,100 90 0.6 n.a. n.a. 55 1.0 n.a. n.a. 66 1.0 n.a. n.a. 52 1.0 n.a. n.a. 53 1.0
RPWR valuation
We believe a DCF is the most appropriate method for valuing RPWR, given the long gestation period of power projects. Our DCF model uses a three-stage forecast for cash flow. The first stage involves cash-flow projections up to FY21. The second stage is the semi-explicit period of FY22-31, during which we assume an annual growth rate of 8% for free cash flow. The third stage is based on a terminalgrowth-rate assumption of 2%. Our model assumes a CoE of 15%. Accordingly, our DCF model gives a value of Rs111.
Reliance Infrastructure
24
FY10E 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.0 35.8 (35.7) 100.0 (35.7)
FY11E FY12E FY13E FY14E FY15E FY16E FY17E FY18E FY19E FY20E FY21E 8.0 7.1 2.7 22.1 71.6 93.0 109.7 121.5 133.1 145.9 148.1 1.9 8.1 24.6 38.1 47.5 50.2 52.2 52.2 52.2 52.2 52.2 10.0 15.2 27.3 60.3 119.1 143.2 161.9 173.7 185.3 198.1 200.3 3.1 6.3 22.2 22.8 16.7 5.1 3.8 1.7 1.7 1.9 0.1 4.5 7.7 25.1 57.6 66.6 66.6 66.6 66.6 66.6 66.6 66.6 60.0 57.2 56.0 44.8 6.9 3.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 29.0 68.0 91.4 105.4 117.0 129.6 133.6 (57.7) (56.1) (75.9) (65.0) 87.0 75.6 65.8 57.2 49.7 43.2 37.6 32.7 28.4 24.7 21.5 14.4 29.4 34.4 34.5 33.3 32.0 28.7 (50.2) (42.4) (49.9) (37.2)
16.0% 78 80 84 87 92
COE
RPWRs value is very sensitive to the CoE. Every 50-basis-point decline results in a 14.4% increase in the value, while every 50-basis-point increase results in a 13% decrease.
Terminal growth
For every 100-basis-point decline in the terminal growth rate, the value decreases by 3.9%. Similarly, for every 100-basis-point increase, the value increases by 4.6%.
PLF
Every 1% variation in the PLF for the power plants has a 4.1% effect on the value of the company.
O&M
O&M expenses consist of employee costs, repairs and maintenance, and administration and general expenses. A 10% decrease in O&M expenses would raise the value by 5.5%.
Reliance Infrastructure
25
Reliance Infrastructure
26
Reliance Infrastructure
27
Reliance Infrastructure
28
Reliance Infrastructure
29
Company background
RELI is a power-distribution licencee in the two metros of Mumbai and Delhi, has a generating capacity of 941MW, and has emerged as a strong player in the EPC business. It has BOT assets across the road, metro-rail, real-estate and power-transmission segments. It has a 45% stake in RPWR, which has pipeline of 33.74GW of greenfield power-generation projects.
Ratios
Year to 31 March EPS (Rs) YoY change (%) Cash EPS (Rs) EBITDA (%) Net-profit margin (%) Net debt to equity (%) PER (x) EV/EBITDA multiple (x) PBR (x) EV/sales (x) ROCE (%) ROE (%) BVPS (Rs) ROA (%) DPS (Rs) Div.-payout ratio (%) Dividend yield (%) Asset-turnover ratio Inventory (days) Receivables (days) Payables (days) 2008 46.0 23.7 55.1 8.6 17.0 41.9 24.7 58.0 2.10 5.0 6.7 10.3 542.5 5.7 6.3 13.6 0.6 0.3 19.9 77.5 73.3 2009 50.4 9.4 59.0 5.2 11.7 59.5 22.6 64.8 2.25 3.4 6.3 9.7 505.4 5.2 7.0 13.8 0.6 0.4 18.9 57.3 69.5 2010E 58.8 16.7 68.7 12.2 13.5 35.6 19.3 25.7 1.8 3.1 6.5 10.2 623.1 5.1 8.2 14.0 0.7 0.4 21.0 70.0 75.0 2011E 63.1 7.3 73.9 11.6 12.1 44.7 18.0 22.4 1.7 2.6 6.4 9.7 678.1 5.1 8.8 14.0 0.8 0.4 20.0 65.0 80.0 2012E 69.8 10.6 81.3 11.0 10.9 35.7 16.3 19.4 1.5 2.1 6.7 9.9 736.5 5.3 9.8 14.0 0.9 0.5 20.0 65.0 80.0
Reliance Infrastructure
30
Materials/Energy (China) Oil & Gas (China, Korea) Property Developers (Hong Kong, China), Conglomerates (Hong Kong) Small/Medium Caps (Hong Kong, China) Telecommunication (Regional, Greater China, Korea and Singapore) Transportation (Hong Kong, China) Geoffrey CHENG Transportation (Hong Kong, China, Singapore) Kelvin LAU Utilities (China) Alan CHAN China Shanghai Strategy (Regional) Automobiles Consumer/Retail All Industries Singapore Head of Research Macro Economy (Regional)
Hirokazu YUIHAMA (Head of Research) Ricon XIA Nicolas WANG Hongxia ZHU
Tatsuya TORIKOSHI Prasenjit K BASU (Chief Economist, Asia Ex-Japan) Banking, Property and REITs (Singapore) David LUM (Regional Head of Banking/Finance) Healthcare (Singapore, Hong Kong and China) Soo Kee ANG Conglomerates, Commodities; Energy and Chris SANDA Small/Medium Caps (Singapore) Hirokazu MITSUDA Christina Y LIU (Chief Economic Advisor) Aaron JENG Calvin HUANG Andrew CHANG Mitsuharu WATANABE Albert HSU Chang H LEE (Head of Research) Sung Yop CHUNG Eric MIN Daniel LEE Sang Hee PARK Naoki IEIRI Jae H LEE Thomas Y KWON Yukino YAMADA (Based in Tokyo) Johan VANDERLUGT David BRENNAN Jaideep GOSWAMI (Head of Research) Punit SRIVASTAVA Vishal CHANDAK Atul RASTOGI Kartik A. MEHTA R. RAVI
Taiwan Head of Research Macro Economy IT/Electronics (IC-design, Semiconductors) IT/ Technology Hardware IT/Technology Hardware (Components) IT/Technology Hardware Materials, Small/Medium Caps South Korea Banking/Finance Automobiles, Shipbuilding, Industrials Banking/Finance Chemicals Consumer/Retail Industrials IT/Electronics IT/Electronics, Software Australia Macro Economy Banking/Insurance Resources/Mining/Petroleum India Strategy/Industrials Banking/Finance Materials Oil & Gas Pharmaceuticals and Healthcare, Consumer Software, Telecommunications
(886) 2 2758 8754 (886) 2 8789 0675 (886) 2 8780 1469 (886) 2 2758 8805 (886) 2 8789 5341 (886) 2 2758 9437 (886) 2 8786 2212 (82) 2 787 9177 (82) 2 787 9157 (82) 2 787 9176 (82) 2 787 9121 (82) 2 787 9165 (82) 2 787 9184 (82) 2 787 9173 (82) 2 787 9181 (81) 3 5555 7219 (61) 3 9916 1335 (61) 3 9916 1323 (91) 22 6622 1010 (91) 22 6622 1013 (91) 22 6622 1006 (91) 22 6622 1020 (91) 22 6622 1012 (91) 22 6622 1014
h.mitsuda@dirtpe.com.tw christina.liu@dirtpe.com.tw aaron.jeng@dirtpe.com.tw calvin.huang@dirtpe.com.tw andrew.chang@dirtpe.com.tw m.watanabe@dirtpe.com.tw albert.hsu@dirtpe.com.tw chlee@daiwasmbc.co.kr sychung@daiwasmbc.co.kr ysmin@daiwasmbc.co.kr daniel.lee@daiwasmbc.co.kr sanghee.park@daiwasmbc.co.kr ieiri@daiwasmbc.co.kr jhlee@daiwasmbc.co.kr yskwon@daiwasmbc.co.kr yu.yamada@rc.dir.co.jp johan.vanderlugt@daiwasmbc.com.au david.brennan@daiwasmbc.com.au jaideep.goswami@in.daiwasmbc.com punit.srivastava@in.daiwasmbc.com vishal.chandak@in.daiwasmbc.com atul.rastogi@in.daiwasmbc.com kartik.mehta@in.daiwasmbc.com ravi.r@in.daiwasmbc.com
Reliance Infrastructure
31
Daiwa Securities America Inc Daiwa Securities Trust Company Daiwa Securities Trust and Banking (Europe) PLC (Head Office)
(1) 212 612 7000 (1) 201 333 7300 (44) 207 320 8000 (353) 1 603 9900
(1) 212 612 7100 (1) 201 333 7726 (44) 207 410 0129 (353) 1 478 3469
Daiwa Securities Trust and Banking (Europe) PLC (Dublin Branch) Level 3, Block 5, Harcourt Centre, Harcourt Road, Dublin 2, Ireland
Daiwa Securities SMBC Europe Limited (Daiwa SMBC Europe) Daiwa Securities SMBC Europe Limited, Frankfurt Branch (Daiwa SMBC Europe, Frankfurt) Daiwa Securities SMBC Europe Limited, Paris Branch (Daiwa SMBC Europe, Paris) Daiwa Securities SMBC Europe Limited, London, Geneva Branch (Daiwa SMBC Europe, Geneva) Daiwa Securities SMBC Europe Limited, Milan Branch (Daiwa SMBC Europe, Milan) Daiwa Securities SMBC Europe Limited, Sucursal en Espaa (Daiwa SMBC Europe, Spain) Daiwa Securities SMBC Europe Limited Moscow Representative Office Daiwa Securities SMBC Europe Limited, Middle East Branch (Daiwa SMBC Europe, Middle East) Daiwa Securities SMBC Europe Limited Dubai Branch Daiwa Securities SMBC Hong Kong Limited Daiwa Securities SMBC Singapore Limited Daiwa Securities SMBC Australia Limited DBP Daiwa Securities SMBC Philippines, Inc Daiwa Securities SMBC-Cathay Co Ltd Daiwa Securities SMBC Co Ltd, Seoul Branch Daiwa Securities SMBC Co Ltd, Beijing Office
(44) 20 7597 8000 (49) 69 717 080 (33) 1 56 262 200 (41) 22 818 7400 (39) 02 763 271 (34) 91 529 9800 (7) 495 617 1960 (973) 17 534 452 (971) 47 090 401 (852) 2525 0121 (65) 6220 3666 (61) 3 9916 1300 (632) 813 7344 (886) 2 2723 9698 (82) 2 787 9100 (86) 10 6500 6688
(44) 20 7597 8600 (49) 69 723 340 (33) 1 47 550 808 (41) 22 818 7441 (39) 02 763 27250 (34) 91 577 5887 (7) 495 244 1977 (973) 17 535 113 (971) 43 230 332 (852) 2845 1621 (65) 6223 6198 (61) 3 9916 1330 (632) 848 0105 (886) 2 2345 3638 (82) 2 787 9191 (86) 10 6500 3594
Daiwa SMBC-SSC Securities Co Ltd, Shanghai Office Daiwa Securities SMBC Co. Ltd, Bangkok Representative Office Daiwa Securities SMBC India Private Limited Daiwa Securities SMBC Co. Ltd, Hanoi Office
(86) 21 6859 8000 (66) 2 231 8381 (91) 22 6622 1000 (84) 4 3946 0460
(86) 21 6859 8030 (66) 2 231 8121 (91) 22 6622 1019 (84) 4 3946 0461
Reliance Infrastructure
32
DISCLAIMER
This publication is produced by Daiwa Securities SMBC Co. Ltd and/or its non-U.S. affiliates, and distributed by Daiwa Securities SMBC Co. Ltd and/or its non-U.S. affiliates, except to the extent expressly provided herein. This publication and the contents hereof are intended for information purposes only, and may be subject to change without further notice. Any use, disclosure, distribution, dissemination, copying, printing or reliance on this publication for any other purpose without our prior consent or approval is strictly prohibited. Neither Daiwa Securities SMBC Co. Ltd nor any of its respective parent, holding, subsidiaries or affiliates, nor any of its respective directors, officers, servants and employees, represent nor warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information contained herein or as to the existence of other facts which might be significant, and will not accept any responsibility or liability whatsoever for any use of or reliance upon this publication or any of the contents hereof. Neither this publication, nor any content hereof, constitute, or are to be construed as, an offer or solicitation of an offer to buy or sell any of the securities or investments mentioned herein in any country or jurisdiction nor, unless expressly provided, any recommendation or investment opinion or advice. Any view, recommendation, opinion or advice expressed in this publication may not necessarily reflect those of Daiwa Securities SMBC Co. Ltd, and/or its affiliates except where the publication states otherwise. This research report is not to be relied upon by any person in making any investment decision or otherwise advising with respect to, or dealing in, the securities mentioned, as it does not take into account the specific investment objectives, financial situation and particular needs of any person. Daiwa Securities SMBC Co. Ltd, its parent, holding, subsidiaries or affiliates, or its or their respective directors, officers and employees from time to time have trades as principals, or have positions in , or have other interests in the securities of the company under research including derivatives in respect of such securities or may have also performed investment banking and other services for the issuer of such securities. The following are additional disclosures. Daiwa Securities SMBC and Daiwa Securities Group Daiwa Securities SMBC is a Daiwa Securities Group company that is 60% owned by parent Daiwa Securities Group and 40% by Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group. Ownership of Securities: Daiwa Securities SMBC Co. Daiwa Securities SMBC may currently, or in the future, own or trade either securities issued by the company referred to in this report or other securities based on such financial instruments. Daiwa Securities Group has filed major shareholding reports for the following companies of which it owns over 5% (as of 31 July 2009): Sumitomo Mitsui Construction (1821); Tanabe Engineering (1828); GABA (2133); Edion (2730); Sapporo Drug Store (2786); Fuji Foods (2913); Netyear Group (3622); Japan Systems Create (3822); FreeBit (3843); Air Water (4088); Soken Chemical & Engineering (4972); Nihon Electric Wire & Cable (5817); Kawagishi Bridge Works (5921); Nasu Denki-Tekko (5922); Super Tool (5990); Hanshin Diesel Works (6018); Okada Aiyon (6294); Toa Valve Holding (6466); Meisei Electric (6709); Sanyo Electric (6764); Shibaura Electronics (6957); Mitsui High-Tec (6966); Taiyo Yuden (6976); Shinseido (7415); Endo Manufacturing (7841); Daiwa Seiko (7990); Daiko Denshi Tsushin (8023); Daiwa SMBC Capital (8458); Astmax (8734); DA Office Investment (8976); Square Enix Holdings (9684); Imperial Hotel (9708); Verite (9904); Valor (9956). Investment Banking Relationship: Daiwa Securities SMBC Co. Daiwa Securities SMBC has lead-managed public offerings and/or secondary offerings (excluding straight bonds) in the past twelve months for the following companies: Linical (2183); Sobal (2186); Yashima Denki (3153); Toridoll (3397); Zappallas (3770); Tri-Wall (3957); C'BON Cosmetics (4926); Toshiba (6502); Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group (8316); Orix (8591); Daiwa Securities Group (8601); T&D Holdings (8795). (list as of 7 August 2009) Investment Banking Relationship: non US affiliates of Daiwa Securities SMBC Co. The non U.S affiliates of Daiwa Securities SMBC in Hong Kong have, within the preceding 12 months, had an investment banking relationship with or received compensation for investment banking services from, the following corporations the securities of which are listed on The Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited; China Automation Group Limited; China Kangda Food Co. Ltd.; Fu Ji Food & Catering Services Holdings Ltd.; International Elite Ltd.; Solargiga Energy Holdings Ltd.. Hong Kong This research is distributed in Hong Kong by Daiwa Securities SMBC Hong Kong Limited (DHK) which is regulated by the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission. Recipients of this research in Hong Kong may contact Daiwa Securities SMBC Hong Kong Limited in respect of any matter arising from or in connection with this research. Relevant Relationship (DHK) Daiwa Securities SMBC Co or its non US affiliates in Hong Kong may from time to time have an individual employed by or associated with any member companies serving as an officer of the company reviewed in this research. DHK market making DHK may from time to time make a market in securities covered by this research. Singapore This research is distributed in Singapore by Daiwa Securities SMBC Singapore Limited and it may only be distributed in Singapore to accredited investors, expert investors and institutional investors as defined in the Financial Advisers Regulations and the Securities and Futures Act. By virtue of distribution to these category of investors, Daiwa Securities SMBC Singapore Limited and its representatives are not required to comply with Section 36 of the Financial Advisers Act (Section 36 relates to disclosure of Daiwa Securities SMBC Singapore Limiteds interest and/or its representatives interest in securities). Recipients of this research in Singapore may contact Daiwa Securities SMBC Singapore Limited in respect of any matter arising from or in connection with the research. Australia This research is distributed in Australia by Daiwa Securities SMBC Stockbroking Limited and it may only be distributed in Australia to wholesale investors within the meaning of the Corporations Act. Recipients of this research in Australia may contact Daiwa Securities SMBC Stockbroking Limited in respect of any matter arising from or in connection with the research. India This research is distributed in India by Daiwa Securities SMBC India Private Limited which is regulated by the Securities and Exchange Board of India. Recipients of this research in India may contact Daiwa Securities SMBC India Private Limited in respect of any matter arising from or in connection with this research.
Reliance Infrastructure
33
DISCLAIMER (contd)
United Kingdom This research report is distributed by Daiwa Securities SMBC Europe Limited, which is authorised and regulated by The Financial Services Authority and is a member of the London Stock Exchange, Eurex and NYSE Liffe. Daiwa Securities SMBC Europe Limited and its affiliates may, from time to time, to the extent permitted by law, participate or invest in other financing transactions with the issuers of the securities referred to herein (the Securities), perform services for or solicit business from such issuers, and/or have a position or effect transactions in the Securities or options thereof and/or may have acted as an underwriter during the past three years for the issuer of such securities. In addition, employees of Daiwa Securities SMBC Europe Limited and its affiliates may have positions and effect transactions in such securities or options and may serve as Directors of such issuers. Daiwa Securities SMBC Europe Limited may, to the extent permitted by applicable UK law and other applicable law or regulation, effect transactions in the Securities before this material is published to recipients. This publication is intended for investors who are not Retail Clients in the United Kingdom within the meaning of the Rules of the FSA and should not therefore be distributed to such Retail Clients in the United Kingdom. Should you enter into investment business with Daiwa Securities SMBC Europes affiliates outside the United Kingdom, we are obliged to advise that the protection afforded by the United Kingdom regulatory system may not apply; in particular, the benefits of the Financial Services Compensation Scheme may not be available. Daiwa Securities SMBC Europe Limited has in place organisational arrangements for the prevention and avoidance of conflicts of interest. These include the requirement that the remuneration of Analysts must not be linked to specific transactions carried out by underwriting or investment banking departments, nor may any decisions on remunerations of Analysts involve the said departments directly. Daiwa Securities SMBC Europe Limiteds research has been published in accordance with our conflict management policy, which is available at http://www.daiwasmbc.co.uk/aboutus/corporate-governance-and-regulatory. Regulatory disclosures of investment banking relationships are available at http://www.daiwausa.com/report_disclosure.html. Germany This document has been approved by Daiwa Securities SMBC Europe Ltd and is distributed in Germany by Daiwa Securities SMBC Europe Ltd, Niederlassung Frankfurt which is regulated by BaFin (Bundesanstalt fuer Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht) for the conduct of business in Germany. United States This report is distributed in the U.S. by Daiwa Securities America Inc. (DSA). It may not be accurate or complete and should not be relied upon as such. It reflects the preparers views at the time of its preparation, but may not reflect events occurring after its preparation; nor does it reflect DSAs views at any time. Neither DSA nor the preparer has any obligation to update this report or to continue to prepare research on this subject. This report is not an offer to sell or the solicitation of any offer to buy securities. Unless this report says otherwise, any recommendation it makes is risky and appropriate only for sophisticated speculative investors able to incur significant losses. Readers should consult their financial advisors to determine whether any such recommendation is consistent with their own investment objectives, financial situation and needs. This report does not recommend to U.S. recipients the use of any of DSAs non-U.S. affiliates to effect trades in any security and is not supplied with any understanding that U.S. recipients of this report will direct commission business to such non-U.S. entities. Unless applicable law permits otherwise, non-U.S. customers wishing to effect a transaction in any securities referenced in this material should contact a Daiwa entity in their local jurisdiction. Most countries throughout the world have their own laws regulating the types of securities and other investment products which may be offered to their residents, as well as a process for doing so. As a result, the securities discussed in this report may not be eligible for sales in some jurisdictions. Customers wishing to obtain further information about this report should contact DSA: Daiwa Securities America Inc., Financial Square, 32 Old Slip, New York, New York 10005 (telephone 212-612-7000). Ownership of Securities. For Ownership of Securities information please visit BlueMatrix disclosure Link at http://www.daiwausa.com/report_disclosure.html. Investment Banking Relationships. For http://www.daiwausa.com/report_disclosure.html. Investment Banking Relationships please visit BlueMatrix disclosure link at
DSA Market Making. For DSA Market Making please visit BlueMatrix disclosure link at http://www.daiwausa.com/report_disclosure.html. DSA made a market in securities or ADRs of the following issuers at the time this report was published. Research Analyst Conflicts. For updates on Research Analyst Conflicts please visit BlueMatrix disclosure link at http://www.daiwausa.com/report_disclosure.html. The principal research analysts who prepared this report have no financial interest in securities of the issuers covered in the report, are not (nor are any members of their household) an officer, director or advisory board member of the issuer(s) covered in the report, and are not aware of any material relevant conflict of interest involving the analyst or DSA, and did not receive any compensation from the issuer during the past 12 months except as noted: no exceptions. Research Analyst Certification. For updates on Research Analyst Certification and Rating System please visit BlueMatrix disclosure link at http://www.daiwausa.com/report_disclosure.html. The views about any and all of the subject securities and issuers expressed in this Research Report accurately reflect the personal views of the research analyst(s) primarily responsible for this report (or the views of the firm producing the report if no individual analysts[s] is named on the report); and no part of the compensation of such analyst(s) (or no part of the compensation of the firm if no individual analyst[s)] is named on the report) was, is, or will be directly or indirectly related to the specific recommendations or views contained in this Research Report. The following explains the rating system in the report as compared to relevant local indices, based on the beliefs of the author of the report. "1": the security could outperform the local index by more than 15% over the next six months. "2": the security is expected to outperform the local index by 5-15% over the next six months. "3": the security is expected to perform within 5% of the local index (better or worse) over the next six months. "4": the security is expected to underperform the local index by 5-15% over the next six months. "5": the security could underperform the local index by more than 15% over the next six months. Additional information may be available upon request.
Reliance Infrastructure
34