Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Purdue University
EDCI 572000
Dr. J. Converso
August 15 2012
CORE Consulting Corporation Kirsten Barrera | Phillip Cook | Lindsey Owens | Freddi Rokaw
Purdue University
Table
of
Contents
Introduction
..............................................................................................................................
5
1.
Goal
Statement
.....................................................................................................................
6
2.
Goal
Analysis
........................................................................................................................
6
3.
Sub-skills
Analysis
..............................................................................................................
7
3.1
Module
1:
Getting
Started
[Subordinate
Skills
Analysis]
..............................................
7
3.2
Module
2:
Sharing
[Subordinate
Skills
Analysis]
............................................................
8
3.3
Module
3:
Events
[Subordinate
Skills
Analysis]
...............................................................
9
3.4
Module
4:
Collaboration
[Subordinate
Skills
Analysis]
..............................................
10
4.
Entry
Behaviors
................................................................................................................
11
5.
Learner
Interview
............................................................................................................
11
6.
Description
of
Learners
.................................................................................................
12
7.
Performance
Context
and
Implications
for
Instruction
......................................
12
8.
Performance
Objectives
.................................................................................................
14
8.1
Module
1
Getting
Started
with
Google+
........................................................................
14
8.2
Module
2
Sharing
in
Google+
...........................................................................................
14
8.3
Module
3
Creating
a
Hangout
event
in
Google+
.....................................................
14
8.4
Module
4
Collaborating
in
Google+
................................................................................
14
9.
Instructional
Sequence
and
Procedures
.................................................................
15
9.1
Module
1
Getting
Started
with
Google+
........................................................................
15
9.2
Module
2
Sharing
in
Google+
...........................................................................................
16
9.3
Module
3
Creating
a
Hangout
event
in
Google+
.....................................................
17
9.4
Module
4
Collaborating
in
Google+
................................................................................
19
10.
Pre-instructional
Activities
........................................................................................
21
10.1
Module
1
Getting
Started
with
Google+
.....................................................................
21
10.2
Module
2
Sharing
in
Google+
.........................................................................................
21
10.3
Module
3
Creating
a
Hangout
event
in
Google+
...................................................
22
10.4
Module
4
Collaborating
in
Google+
.............................................................................
22
11.
Practice/Feedback
........................................................................................................
23
Practice
Test:
Peer
Review
Checklist
.......................................................................................
23
12.
Terminal
Objective
Strategy
......................................................................................
24
12.1
Module
1
Getting
Started
with
Google+
.....................................................................
24
12.2
Module
2
Sharing
in
Google+
.........................................................................................
25
12.3
Module
3
Creating
a
Hangout
event
in
Google+
...................................................
26
12.4
Module
4
Collaborating
in
Google+
.............................................................................
28
13.
Student
Groupings
and
Media
Selections
..............................................................
30
13.1
Module
1
Getting
Started
with
Google+
.....................................................................
30
13.2
Module
2
Sharing
in
Google+
.........................................................................................
30
13.3
Module
3
Creating
a
Hangout
event
in
Google+
...................................................
30
CORE Consulting Corporation Kirsten Barrera | Phillip Cook | Lindsey Owens | Freddi Rokaw Page 2 September 17, 2012
Purdue University
14.
Pre-
and
Post-test
Samples
.........................................................................................
32
14.1
Pre-test:
Observation
Checklist
.......................................................................................
32
14.2
Post-test:
Observation
Frequency
Checklist
................................................................
32
15.
Instructional
Materials
................................................................................................
34
15.1
Module
1
Getting
Started
with
Google+
.....................................................................
34
15.2
Module
2
Sharing
in
Google+
.........................................................................................
34
15.3
Module
3
Creating
a
Hangout
event
in
Google+
...................................................
35
15.4
Module
4
Collaborating
in
Google+
.............................................................................
35
16.
Evaluation
of
Pilot
Instruction
..................................................................................
37
16.1
Learner
Characteristics
......................................................................................................
37
16.1.a
Module
1
Getting
Started
with
Google+
.............................................................................
37
16.1.b
Module
2
Sharing
in
Google+
.................................................................................................
37
16.1.c
Module
3
Creating
a
Hangout
event
in
Google
+
........................................................
37
16.1.d
Module
4
Collaborating
in
Google+
.....................................................................................
37
16.2
Context
and
Procedures
.....................................................................................................
38
16.2.a
Module
1
Getting
Started
with
Google+
.............................................................................
38
16.2.b
Module
2
Sharing
in
Google+
.................................................................................................
38
16.2.c
Module
3
Creating
a
Hangout
event
in
Google
+
........................................................
39
16.2.d
Module
4
Collaborating
in
Google+
.....................................................................................
40
16.3
Data
and
Findings
.................................................................................................................
40
16.3.a
Module
1
Getting
Started
with
Google+
.............................................................................
40
16.3.b
Module
2
Sharing
in
Google+
.................................................................................................
41
16.3.c
Module
3
Creating
a
Hangout
event
in
Google
+
........................................................
42
16.3.d
Module
4
Collaborating
in
Google+
.....................................................................................
43
16.4
Revisions
to
Instruction
and
Assessment
.....................................................................
44
16.4.a
Module
1
Getting
Started
with
Google+
.............................................................................
44
16.4.b
Module
2
Sharing
in
Google+
.................................................................................................
44
16.4.c
Module
3
Creating
a
Hangout
event
in
Google
+
........................................................
44
16.4.d
Module
4
Collaborating
in
Google+
.....................................................................................
44
Appendix
.................................................................................................................................
45
Figure
1.2:
Workshop
Workflow
...............................................................................................
45
Figure
2:
Goal
Analysis
.................................................................................................................
46
Figure
3.1
-
Module
1:
Subordinate
Skills
Analysis
............................................................
47
Figure
3.2
-
Module
2:
Subordinate
Skills
Analysis
.............................................................
48
Figure
3.3
-
Module
3:
Subordinate
Skills
Analysis
.............................................................
49
Figure
3.4
-
Module
4:
Subordinate
Skills
Analysis
.............................................................
50
Figure
4.1.a
Technology
Readiness
Survey
Questions
...................................................
51
Figure
4.1.b
Technology
Readiness
Survey
Results
........................................................
53
Figure
9.1a
Getting
Started
with
Google+
Instructional
Job
Aid
.................................
54
Figure
9.1b
Objective
Assessments
........................................................................................
55
Figure
10.1
Getting
Started
with
Google+
Overview
Quiz
.............................................
56
Figure
10.2a
Entry
Skills
Quiz
&
Social
Media
Etiquette
Reference
Guide
..............
57
Table
11a
Peer
Review
Checklist
...........................................................................................
63
Table
13.3.a
-
Module
3:
Collection
Worksheet
....................................................................
66
CORE Consulting Corporation Kirsten Barrera | Phillip Cook | Lindsey Owens | Freddi Rokaw Page 3 September 17, 2012
Purdue University
Table 13.3.b - Module 3: Quick Reference Guide ................................................................. 67 Table 14a Pretest Observation Checklist ............................................................................ 68 Figure 15.2 Module 2 Instructional Materials ................................................................... 69 Figure 15.4 Module 4 Instructional Materials ...................................................................... 80 Figure 15.4.1 Group Activity Sheet ....................................................................................................... 80 Figure 15.4.2 Group Roles ........................................................................................................................ 81 Figure 15.4.3 Group Lab Handout ......................................................................................................... 82 Figure 15.4.4 Group Data .......................................................................................................................... 86 Figure 16.3.1 Module 3: Final Test ........................................................................................ 88
References .............................................................................................................................. 90
CORE Consulting Corporation Kirsten Barrera | Phillip Cook | Lindsey Owens | Freddi Rokaw
Purdue University
Introduction
LightBulb
High
School
specializes
in
the
disciplines
of
science
and
technology.
The
school
serves
1,000
students
in
grades
9- 12.
The
faculty
has
decided
to
use
social
media
to
create
an
online
networking
and
knowledge
sharing
space
for
all
four
grades.
LightBulb
High
School
has
selected
Google+
to
share
news
and
scholastic
resources,
promote
student
achievements
and
success
stories,
collaborate
on
Figure
1.1
LightBulb
High
School
extracurricular
course
activities
and
provide
a
social
network
that
strengthens
student-teacher
relationships.
LightBulb
High
School
has
contracted
Core
Consulting
Corporation
to
lead
this
initiative,
design
the
required
instructional
materials,
and
select
a
pilot
group
for
the
first
implementation
phase.
Core
Consulting
Corp.
has
designed
a
four-part
workshop
that
combines
technical
demonstrations
with
best
practices
on
using
social
media
for
academic
collaboration.
The
four
modules
of
this
workshop
occur
sequentially
and
cover
the
following
topics:
Getting
Started
(module
1),
Sharing
(module
2),
Events
(module
3)
and
Collaboration
(module
4).
Figure 1.2: Workshop workflow and breakdown (see full-sized chart in appendix)
CORE Consulting Corporation Kirsten Barrera | Phillip Cook | Lindsey Owens | Freddi Rokaw
Purdue University
1.
Goal
Statement
Students
will
use
Google+
to
share
news
and
scholastic
resources,
promote
their
achievements
and
success
stories,
collaborate
on
extracurricular
course
activities
and
provide
a
social
network
that
strengthens
student-teacher
relationships.
2.
Goal
Analysis
Each
of
the
four
modules
is
designed
to
promote
student
reflection,
interaction
and
collaboration
to
increase
their
conceptual
understanding
and
application
of
course
concepts.
The
goals
for
each
of
the
four
modules
are
shown
below.
CORE Consulting Corporation Kirsten Barrera | Phillip Cook | Lindsey Owens | Freddi Rokaw
Purdue University
3.
Sub-skills
Analysis
Using
hierarchical
analysis
and
procedural
analysis
strategies,
the
following
four
diagrams
illustrate
the
subordinate
skills
needed
to
complete
each
of
the
four
modules
of
the
Social
Media
Workshop.
A
combination
of
intellectual
skills,
psychomotor
skills,
verbal
information
and
attitudinal
skills
are
represented.
Figure 3.1: Module 1: Subordinate Skills Analysis (see full-sized chart in appendix)
CORE Consulting Corporation Kirsten Barrera | Phillip Cook | Lindsey Owens | Freddi Rokaw
Purdue University
Students will choose to use appropriate social media sharing etiquette by posting messages to Google+ that are friendly, academically relevant and adheres to the schools Code of Conduct policies. This is an attitudinal goal, which requires intellectual skills to execute.
Figure
3.2:
Module
2:
Subordinate
Skills
Analysis
(see
full-sized
chart
in
appendix)
CORE Consulting Corporation Kirsten Barrera | Phillip Cook | Lindsey Owens | Freddi Rokaw
Purdue University
Figure 3.3: Module 3: Subordinate Skills Analysis (see full-sized chart in Appendix)
CORE Consulting Corporation Kirsten Barrera | Phillip Cook | Lindsey Owens | Freddi Rokaw
Purdue University
Figure 3.4: Module 4: Subordinate Skills Analysis (see full-sized chart in appendix)
CORE Consulting Corporation Kirsten Barrera | Phillip Cook | Lindsey Owens | Freddi Rokaw
Purdue University
4.
Entry
Behaviors
Participants
in
this
four-part
workshop
are
in
the
eleventh
grade
and
will
have
demonstrated
a
basic
ability
to
type
and
read.
Based
on
results
from
the
Technology
Readiness
Survey
(administered
prior
to
the
start
of
class),
all
students
are
considered
to
be
frequent
Internet
and
social
media
users.
According
to
the
survey,
all
students
have
the
basic
ability
to
operate
a
computer
and
connect
to
the
Internet.
All
students
have
access
to
computers
with
Internet
connections
at
home,
school
computer
lab
or
local
library.
The
school
uses
Google
Apps
for
EDU,
so
each
student
has
a
school-domain
linked
user
name
and
password.
School
calendars
are
posted
on
the
web
at
www.lightbulbhs.edu,
and
individual
faculty
members
post
important
event
dates
on
personal
pages
within
the
schools
website.
It
is
apparent
that
all
students
have
the
ability
to
communicate
with
their
peers,
as
is
evidenced
in
social
situations
throughout
the
school
day
and
beyond
the
classroom
environment.
There
are
no
physical,
visual
or
hearing
accessibility
issues
within
the
group
of
target
learners
that
might
impair
the
ability
to
communicate
with
one
another.
Support
has
been
provided
and
agreed
to
by
school
administration,
faculty
and
parents
(forms
were
sent
home
with
students
to
confirm
parental
support).
5.
Learner
Interview
There
are
three
potential
types
of
learners
in
the
pilot
and
all
will
have
different
needs:
1. Students
who
are
not
familiar
with
the
social
media
concept
of
a
profile.
2. Students
who
are
familiar
with
the
social
media
concept
of
profile,
but
not
familiar
with
the
method
Google+
uses
or
its
features.
3. Students
who
know
how
to
set
up
a
Google+
profile
and
are
familiar
with
the
features.
The
Technology
Readiness
Survey
was
given
to
all
students
at
LightBulb
High
School.
Based
on
the
results
of
this
survey,
the
11th
grade
chemistry
class
was
the
one
chosen
for
the
pilot
workshop.
The
results
were
also
used
to
assess
the
type
of
learners
in
the
audience.
There
were
a
total
of
10
questions,
administered
anonymously
online
via
Survey
Monkey.
See
Appendix
for
actual
survey
questions.
Survey
Results
Summary:
Overwhelmingly
it
was
found
the
learners
had
experience
with
computers
and
social
media.
Students
devoted
large
amounts
of
time
to
various
social
networking
platforms,
but
none
directly
with
the
Google+
platform.
Instructors
felt
they
could
capitalize
on
the
amount
of
time
students
spend
on
social
networking
by
making
it
an
educational
experience.
Students
seem
to
echo
the
same
sentiments
with
questions
8
and
9.
Based
on
the
experience
with
computers
both
at
home
and
school
and
the
willingness
to
communicate
to
with
classmates,
instructors
were
CORE Consulting Corporation Kirsten Barrera | Phillip Cook | Lindsey Owens | Freddi Rokaw Page 11 September 17, 2012
Purdue University
confident if given instructions, the learners could navigate the Google+ platform. See Appendix for actual survey results.
6.
Description
of
Learners
A
group
of
30
students
enrolled
in
11th
grade
chemistry
course
at
LightBulb
High
School
in
San
Francisco,
California
and
have
agreed
to
participate
in
a
pilot
group.
To
gather
background
information
on
the
students,
demographic
data
was
collected
from
official
school
records,
academic
data
was
collected
from
the
instructor,
and
student
insight
data
was
collected
through
a
Technology
Readiness
Survey.
These
students
are
between
the
ages
of
17
and
18
and
are
all
enrolled
in
the
same
chemistry
class.
Based
the
Technology
Readiness
Survey
results,
all
students
considered
themselves
frequent
Internet
and
social
media
users,
but
only
10%
of
the
students
are
familiar
with
Google+.
All
students
have
access
to
computers
with
Internet
connections
at
home
or
at
the
school
computer
lab.
The
school
uses
Google
Apps
for
EDU,
so
each
student
has
a
school-domain
linked
user
name
and
password.
Students
are
geographically
spread
out
throughout
the
city
with
only
20%
living
within
3
miles
of
the
school.
The
students
selected
for
this
pilot
group
come
from
a
variety
of
ethnic
backgrounds
(5%
African
American,
25%
Asian,
50%
Caucasian,
15%
Hispanic,
and
5%
multiethnic),
which
is
representative
of
the
LightBulb
High
School
student
body.
More
than
half
of
the
group
consists
of
upper-middle
class
students
with
total
family
incomes
averaging
$200,000
per
year.
They
had
little
to
no
previous
knowledge
of
chemistry;
however
all
completed
the
prerequisite,
biology,
prior
to
starting
the
course.
Motivation
to
succeed
is
very
high,
as
the
students
will
be
taking
standardized
state
tests
at
the
end
of
the
year
that
will
determine
their
placement
in
advanced
classes
for
their
senior,
pre-college
year
of
high
school.
20%
of
the
students
are
achieving
a
grade
of
A,
50%
have
a
B,
15%
have
a
C
and
5%
are
currently
failing
their
chemistry
class.
Students
have
communicated
that
they
are
excited
to
be
utilizing
social
media
in
the
classroom
and
are
very
willing
to
enhance
their
learning
by
peer
collaboration
and
online
supplementary
resources.
Purdue University
collaboration in the classroom in a virtual environment in order to maintain the students motivation for learning. Support has been provided and agreed to by school administration, faculty and parents (forms were sent home with students to confirm parental support). The school uses Google Apps for EDU, so each student has a school-domain linked user name and password. Students will be creating the virtual learning environment from home or a local library where they have adequate equipment and Internet service. If computers are not equipped with cameras for video chat, students can instant message by typing questions, responses and to add other input. Because parental consent and support have been given, the study environment will be treated respectfully with quiet and minimal distraction. Technology compatibility constraints should not present any issues in the development or delivery of the training as the online process will be accessible across both Mac and PC platforms and across multiple web browsers including Internet Explorer, Firefox, Chrome and Safari. Possible constraints may include issues such as the inability of family members to adhere to the creation of an environment conducive to studying in the home, power outages, computers that might be unavailable, break down or crash, insufficient internet speed. In addition, the social immaturity of unpredictable teenagers collaborating may affect the learning context. These constraints could cause serious implications to the instructional effort. With Googles rapid development cycle, however, another potential constraint may arise where a new feature, button or user interface customization may be present in the live instance of Google+ that is not presented in the instructional text or screenshots. It will be crucial to keep these training lessons up-to-date as often as possible to overcome this challenge. Another potential constraint may arise with the required time commitment needed from the instructor to review all student postings to ensure that content adheres to LightBulb High School code of conduct guidelines. A unit will be included in the Sharing lesson that covers social media etiquette and instructs students how to interact online under the schools Code of Conduct policies. This instruction should help offset the need for the instructor to be hyper-vigilant on all student online activities.
CORE Consulting Corporation Kirsten Barrera | Phillip Cook | Lindsey Owens | Freddi Rokaw
Purdue University
8.
Performance
Objectives
8.1
Module
1
Getting
Started
with
Google+
The
student
will
create
a
custom
Google+
profile
to
interact
with
classmates
and
instructors
via
a
school
administered
email
address.
CORE Consulting Corporation Kirsten Barrera | Phillip Cook | Lindsey Owens | Freddi Rokaw
Purdue University
CORE Consulting Corporation Kirsten Barrera | Phillip Cook | Lindsey Owens | Freddi Rokaw
Purdue University
Purdue University
Lesson 2C: Add Website URL o Text-based step-by step documentation o 2-minute video instruction demonstration the steps to add a URL to a post o Activity: Post URL Part 3: Setting Permissions o Text-based step-by step documentation o 2-minute video instruction demonstrating the steps to limit visibility to an individual/team, disable comments and lock post o Activity: Post message based on varying permission security options Reminder: Summary of social media etiquette tips Next Steps: What students should do after completing instruction
Purdue University
a. Compiling a list of email addresses and writing them on the Collection Worksheet 7. Learners will log in to Google+ by: a. Connecting to the Internet b. Launching a browser c. Entering the URL in address bar d. Entering the learners school-issued user name e. Enter the learners school-issued password and selecting enter 8. Learners will create an event by: a. Selecting event b. Selecting create event c. Selecting the hangout event option from the drop-down menu 9. Learners will enter a date and time for the event by: a. Selecting calendar b. Selecting the pre-determined month c. Selecting the pre-determined date d. Selecting the pre-determined time 10. Learners will add peers as invitees by: a. Completing the invitee field with a list of addresses from Collection Worksheet 11. Learners will send an invitation to the event by: a. Selecting the invite box Follow-through activities include memory aids, as alerts will be set up in Google+ calendars to notify students of the event that they created or have been invited to participate in by email. Students will also provide feedback to each other using the Peer Review Checklist so that they may demonstrate their proficiency and mastery of the instruction. When students have successfully created an event for a study group session in which the group will have discussed study topics, compared class notes and shared best practices in study methods, the results of the transfer will be apparent during the final assessment of grades that analyze previous and current test scores. There will also be a final test used for assessment of this module.
CORE Consulting Corporation Kirsten Barrera | Phillip Cook | Lindsey Owens | Freddi Rokaw
Purdue University
CORE Consulting Corporation Kirsten Barrera | Phillip Cook | Lindsey Owens | Freddi Rokaw
Purdue University
Within the group, learners will designate a group leader, and recorder. The group leader will facilitate the discussion. The recorder will be the note taker for the groups collaboration. IV. Group collaboration activity Group members will meet remotely via Google+ to discuss the identification of glass fragments using density techniques (from the Forensics unit in chemistry that they had recently completed). The group task entails synthesizing the posted results from several data sources to correctly identify the type of glass fragment. During this activity, the instructor will be available via email, and will facilitate remotely via a classroom or office space. All data will be the same throughout all groups, so that the overall result may be discussed as a whole group at the conclusion of the module. V. Debriefing and conclusion of module Learner groups will reassemble in the classroom and discuss outcome of collaboration. Groups will whiteboard what worked well and what troubles arose during the collaborative session. Instructor will facilitate the discussion and prompt for check of understanding. VI. Post-module Evaluation Learners will take the post-module evaluation via a created Google Form using their school-issued laptops. Learners receive feedback, showing level of proficiency. Learners are dismissed upon full completion of the post-module evaluation.
CORE Consulting Corporation Kirsten Barrera | Phillip Cook | Lindsey Owens | Freddi Rokaw
Purdue University
Figure 10.2a: Social Media Etiquette Entry Quiz & Reference Guide (see Appendix for full size screenshots or view interactive quiz and watch video on the web)
CORE Consulting Corporation Kirsten Barrera | Phillip Cook | Lindsey Owens | Freddi Rokaw
Purdue University
Students will have already taken the workshop pre-tests, including the Technology Readiness Survey. Successful completion of module 1 of this workshop is necessary prior to beginning this module 3. For motivational purposes, the instructor will introduce this module of the Google+ workshop as the module that allows them to begin interacting with their friends and peers. The instructor will discuss the reason why they are learning to create a Google+ hangout event. An example of President Obama's Google+ Hangout will be shown during this time.
The motivation should come from this example that is relevant and prescient to 11th grade students. Hopefully the students will understand that if Google+ hangouts are a medium that their President uses, it must be valuable and important. The concept of a hangout in virtual space will also mirror the authentic collaboration that already exists in the classroom and will maintain the students motivation for learning. In addition, the creation of a Google+ hangout event will be detailed by the instructor. The learners will be walked through the procedure during class so they will understand how to create such an event for their study group and any future events that will take place (academic and personal).
Purdue University
11.
Practice/Feedback
Practice
Test:
Peer
Review
Checklist
Overview:
Students
are
encouraged
to
practice
the
technical
steps
outlined
in
the
instructional
materials
provided
for
each
of
the
four
modules
as
many
times
as
necessary
to
master
the
activities
in
the
Google+.
In
addition,
a
peer
review
assignment
is
provided
as
an
assessment
item
during
the
instructional
workshop.
During
this
peer
review,
students
have
the
ability
to
observe
the
performance
of
their
partner
and
acknowledge
whether
they
have
accurately
achieved
the
objective.
Students
have
the
opportunity
to
revise
messages
or
post
new
content
based
on
their
partners
feedback.
This
assessment
activity
provides
both
individuals
an
opportunity
to
reflect
on
the
instruction
and
demonstrate
mastery
of
the
activity.
Peer Review Assignment: Collaborate with your partner in a peer review assignment to observe whether each student has properly achieved the learning objective for the designated module in the social media workshop. Use the following checklist to ensure all items are completed.
Figure 11a: Peer Review Checklist (see Appendix for complete checklist)
CORE Consulting Corporation Kirsten Barrera | Phillip Cook | Lindsey Owens | Freddi Rokaw
Purdue University
Purdue University
The Sharing workshop module utilizes instructional strategies that align with Gagnes 9 Instructional Events and Kellers ARCS Learner Motivation Model. The following examples illustrate the end-to-end lifecycle view of the learning process: Gaining attention: The workshop lesson is positioned as a fun and engaging experience. All students have relevant experience using other social media platforms, so confidence should be reinforced after demonstrating similarities to Facebook. Informing learner of the objective: Introduction screen in the online workshop provides an outline of the 3-part lesson and an overview of the objective so that the students can acknowledge what they will be able to accomplish by the end of the lesson. Stimulating recall of prerequisite learning: Students are provided with a Social Media Etiquette reference guide and will be required to pass an entry skills test prior to beginning the instruction. Completion of this test should reinforce they know how to demonstrate appropriate behaviors when posting messages online. Presenting the stimulus material: Students follow a three-part web-based lesson paired with instructional videos, text-based documentation and hands-on activities. Providing learning guidance: Screenshot images are used throughout the textbased documentation to provide students guidance on what they see on screen. Short videos are used to illustrate interactive components, such as menu items, and to demonstrate the content publishing process. Eliciting the performance: Activities are introduced at the end of each part of the lesson providing students the opportunity to practice what they have seen in the lesson. Providing feedback about performance correctness: A peer review assignment is included as a part of the workshop lesson to pair students together to observe performance and provide feedback on their behaviors. The instructor will also be regularly monitoring student posts to guide individuals if they are demonstrating inadequate performance. Assessing the performance: Entry skills tests, pretests, practice tests and posttests will all be utilized for this module to assess ongoing performance.
Page 25 September 17, 2012
CORE Consulting Corporation Kirsten Barrera | Phillip Cook | Lindsey Owens | Freddi Rokaw
Purdue University
Enhancing retention and transfer: With repeated practice and usage throughout the semester, students should be demonstrating mastery of the activities outlined in the workshop lesson by the end of the course. Through the web-based instruction and activities, students should be able to apply what they have learned during the course to social media activities in other courses or personal activities outside of class.
Summary
Goal:
Students
will
generate
an
online
hangout
event
in
Google+
inviting
fellow
classmates
to
discuss
study
topics,
compare
class
notes
and
share
best
practices
in
study
methods.
This
is
an
intellectual
as
well
as
a
psychomotor
learning
objective
and
contains
sub-steps
that
are
cognitive
and
intellectual
in
nature
as
well.
Context:
The
initial
instruction
and
validation
of
goals
will
take
place
in
class.
The
final
goal
of
the
instruction
will
take
place
outside
of
class
and
outside
of
school
hours.
Total
in-class
instruction,
set-up
and
follow-through
should
be
completed
in
one
hour.
This
specific
training
module
will
take
advantage
of
the
collaboration
that
takes
place
in
a
virtual
environment.
The
goal
is
to
mirror
the
authentic
collaboration
in
the
classroom
in
a
virtual
environment
in
order
to
maintain
the
students
motivation
for
learning.
As
seen
in
the
learner
analysis,
this
type
of
environment
is
familiar
and
appealing
to
the
students.
Pre-instructional
activities
Motivation:
The
instructor
will
introduce
this
module
of
the
Google+
workshop
as
the
module
that
allows
them
to
start
interacting
with
their
friends
and
peers.
The
instructor
will
discuss
the
reason
why
they
are
learning
to
create
a
Google+
hangout
event.
An
example
of
a
hangout
event
with
the
President
will
be
shown
during
this
time.
The
motivation
should
come
from
this
example
that
is
relevant
and
prescient
to
11th
grade
students.
The
concept
of
a
hangout
in
a
virtual
environment
will
also
mirror
the
authentic
collaboration
that
already
exists
in
the
classroom
and
will
maintain
the
students
motivation
for
learning.
Objectives:
The
creation
of
a
Google+
hangout
event
will
be
detailed.
The
learners
will
be
walked
through
the
procedure
during
class
so
they
will
understand
how
to
create
one
for
their
study
group
and
any
future
events
that
will
take
place
(academic
and
personal).
Entry
Skills:
Entry
skills
for
this
instruction
include
the
ability
to
use
a
computer.
Students
will
be
able
to
enter
information
(typing
or
voice-to-text)
as
input
into
the
CORE Consulting Corporation Kirsten Barrera | Phillip Cook | Lindsey Owens | Freddi Rokaw Page 26 September 17, 2012
Purdue University
computer.
Students
will
have
the
ability
to
read.
Learners
will
have
already
taken
the
module
in
the
workshop
that
provides
them
with
a
User
ID
and
password
for
Google+.
They
will
have
access
to
their
peers
to
compile
a
list
of
email
addresses
for
their
inclusion
in
the
study
group.
Students
will
also
have
access
to
a
valid
school
or
personal
planner
to
determine
availability
for
a
study
group.
Support
has
been
provided
and
agreed
to
by
school
administration,
faculty
and
parents
(forms
were
sent
home
with
students
to
confirm
parental
support).
Student
Grouping
and
Media
Selections:
Instructor
led
to
the
entire
group.
Instruction
will
be
delivered
throughout
the
hour,
along
with
hands-on
use
of
a
computer.
The
instructor
will
create
differentiated
groups
based
on
current
ability,
which
correlates
to
grades
in
an
effort
to
have
all
levels
of
understanding
represented
in
each
group.
Group
size
will
range
from
3-6
students,
including
the
learner.
The
instructor
will
distribute
two
procedural
worksheets:
One
for
lists
of
names
and
addresses
to
be
collected
and
used
as
a
worksheet
for
objective
2.0,
and
one
for
a
list
of
procedures
to
follow
that
may
be
used
for
reference
only.
The
instructor
will
mirror
his/her
computer
while
showing
examples
of
Google+
hangouts
during
the
beginning
of
instruction
and
welcome.
The
class
will
be
supported
and
supervised
by
the
instructor
during
this
one-hour
exercise.
Assessment
Pre-tests:
There
will
be
no
formal
pretests
for
this
module
as
all
members
of
the
target
population
have
participated
in
the
Pre-Test
Observation
session
and
have
proven
to
be
proficient
in
how
to
use
a
computer,
have
Google+
User
IDs
and
passwords,
and
have
the
ability
to
communicate
with
their
peers.
Post-tests:
The
post-test
for
this
instruction
will
take
place
after
each
student
has
successfully
sent
out
invitations
for
study
groups
to
their
peers.
The
final
assessment
will
confirm
that
the
student
has
successfully
created
an
event
for
a
study
group
session
in
which
the
group
discussed
study
topics,
compared
class
notes
and
shared
best
practices
in
study
methods.
Feedback
will
come
from
peers
that
were
involved
in
the
learners
study
group.
The
instructor
will
make
final
assessments
after
analyzing
the
comparison
of
latest
test
results
to
those
of
previous
tests
throughout
the
year
that
will
assess
the
students
level
of
proficiency
and
mastery.
Student
Grouping
and
Media
Selections:
Learners
will
be
able
to
collaborate
during
the
instruction,
but
all
assessments
will
be
submitted
individually.
The
assessments
will
be
submitted
either
on
paper
or
in
the
form
of
a
computer
file.
CORE Consulting Corporation Kirsten Barrera | Phillip Cook | Lindsey Owens | Freddi Rokaw Page 27 September 17, 2012
Purdue University
Follow-through Activities Memory Aid: Alerts will be set up in Google+ calendars to notify students of the event that they created or have been invited to participate in by email. Transfer: Students will have successfully created an event for a study group session in which the group will have discussed study topics, compared class notes and shared best practices in study methods. The results of the transfer will be apparent during the final assessment of grades that analyze previous and current test scores. Student Grouping and Media Selections: Students will be grouped in study group sessions as selected in step 2.0. The media selection will include computers and class notes. Content Presentation and Learner Participation Student Grouping and Media Selection: The instructor will lead the introduction for the entire class. Most work will be done individually on computers. There will be a worksheet and a reference sheet distributed at the beginning of the hour. Students will be encouraged to ask questions, share discoveries and collaborate with one another during the course of the instructional hour. Content Presentation: The instructor will explain, supervise and validate the process of creating a hangout event in Google+ for the purposes of initiating a study group. The learners will be encouraged to ask questions and share examples as the group moves through the instruction. Examples: Examples of other Google+ hangouts will be provided during instruction. One example to be used is that of a hangout event with President Obama regarding his 2012 State of the Union address from January 30, 2012.
Purdue University
Assessment The primary focus of this module of instruction is to enable learners to identify, conduct and evaluate effective collaborative sessions using Google+ Hangouts in order to improve their performance and understanding of course related concepts within the context of end of unit challenges and related group tasks. With this in mind, evaluation of the module will be comprised of two online evaluations: a post-module evaluation, as well as a team evaluation, which will be completed by each of the group members within the student teams at the conclusion of the module. Sample evaluation items are shown in the right hand columns of the tables in the Objectives & Evaluation section, and consist of learner-centered and context-centered prompts. The primary goal of the post-module evaluation is to have the student teams self-assess their ability to utilize Google+ hangouts in order to successfully and cooperatively solve a context driven task in their class.
CORE Consulting Corporation Kirsten Barrera | Phillip Cook | Lindsey Owens | Freddi Rokaw
Purdue University
Student Groupings: Since the instructor is striving to enhance student engagement and close the communication gap, student grouping strategies are encouraged and heavily utilized to promote socialization and maintain motivation. During live class instruction, students work in teams of 4 on lab activities. These teams are represented in Circles in Google+ in order to promote additional communication and collaboration outside of class. For this workshop module, students are grouped in pairs of 2 (within their 4- person team) for the peer-review assignment to observe performance on posting messages, photos, videos and URLs to Google+. Media Selection: Web-based e-learning tutorial Multimedia videos Step-by-step text-based documentation
Purdue University
a list of procedures to follow that may be used for reference throughout instruction. The instructor will mirror the display of his/her computer while showing examples of Google+ hangouts during the beginning of instruction and welcome. The class will be supported and supervised by the instructor during this one-hour exercise. There will be use of external video sources for example purposes.
CORE Consulting Corporation Kirsten Barrera | Phillip Cook | Lindsey Owens | Freddi Rokaw
Purdue University
Figure 14.1: Pretest Observation Checklist sample (see Appendix for complete Pretest Checklist)
CORE Consulting Corporation Kirsten Barrera | Phillip Cook | Lindsey Owens | Freddi Rokaw
Purdue University
For the instructor: Use the following frequency count checklist to determine level of student engagement. Place a tally mark in the designated column for each item (positive or negative) to evaluate how well the student is adhering to the social media etiquette guide. Observation Item: Updates personal profile Posts a statement Posts a question Responds to a classmates post Answers a classmates question Posts a photo Posts a video Posts a URL Creates an event Collaborates live with classmates Shares relevant documents during collaboration Frequency of Behavior Notes / Comments Positive Negative
CORE Consulting Corporation Kirsten Barrera | Phillip Cook | Lindsey Owens | Freddi Rokaw
Purdue University
Figure 25.2: Social Media Workshop Sharing Instructional Materials (see Appendix for full size screenshots or view interactive quiz and watch video on the web)
CORE Consulting Corporation Kirsten Barrera | Phillip Cook | Lindsey Owens | Freddi Rokaw
Purdue University
Prior to this module, students will have completed modules 1 and 2. They will have already completed the Technology Readiness Survey and Entry Skills Quiz. During instruction there will be a Worksheet and a Quick Reference Guide distributed at the beginning of the hour-long module. Students will view a video as an example of a Google+ Hangout event featuring President Obama. Other media selections will include student generated class notes to be shared with the entire class. Following this module, students will take a Final Test. This final assessment will confirm that the student has successfully created an event for a study group session in which the group discussed study topics, compared class notes and shared best practices in study methods. Following the entire workshop, students will complete a Peer Feedback form and the final workshop assessment will be produced by analyzing the comparison of latest test results to those of previous tests throughout the year.
CORE Consulting Corporation Kirsten Barrera | Phillip Cook | Lindsey Owens | Freddi Rokaw
Purdue University
The module begins with students viewing a screencast, showing the creation of a Google+ Hangout.
Students are provided with a single handout, which describes the activity and expectations. The rest of the instructional materials (roles, data, and lab sheet) are available digitally on the Schoology module page. Following the module, students will complete a team evaluation and post-module evaluation.
CORE Consulting Corporation Kirsten Barrera | Phillip Cook | Lindsey Owens | Freddi Rokaw
Purdue University
Purdue University
Learner 2: Caucasian male, 35 years old, occupation science educator at a private boarding school. Familiar with using computers to access the Internet and has an active Google+ account. Has not used Google+ Hangouts prior to this instruction.
CORE Consulting Corporation Kirsten Barrera | Phillip Cook | Lindsey Owens | Freddi Rokaw
Purdue University
o Instructor provided both an overview and context of Module 1 prior to beginning of the workshop module. o Instructor demonstrated how to access the entry quiz, social media reference guide and Sharing module instructional presentation. o Instructor observed Learner actions and answered questions throughout the process. 16.2.c Module 3 Creating a Hangout event in Google + Context for Learner 1 and Learner 2: Instruction took place late at night in a comfortable home environment on individual personal computers. The computers had small screens and the Internet service was deemed to be adequate. Learners were directed through the module using instructor-lead guidance and observation. The goal was to mimic the environment of the real instructional setting (which has no direct instructor involvement). Learners were instructed how to access the instructional materials, were provided with the context behind Module 1 Getting Started and were observed as they worked through the content independently with guidance from the instructor. Procedure: o Learners 1 and 2 had existing Google+ accounts prior to starting the instruction and were able to successfully log into their personal profiles before beginning instruction. o Both Learners were surprised to find out their profiles did not contain current or accurate information. o Time was spent updating current profiles. o Instructor provided overview and context of Module 3 prior to beginning of the module by using discussion and observation techniques. o Instructor demonstrated how to access the Entry Skills Quiz, Worksheet, Quick Reference Guide and Peer Review Checklist. o Instructor observed and took notes on Learner actions. o Instructor guided discussions and answered questions throughout the module. o A Final Test was taken at the conclusion of the module. o Learners were thanked and encouraged to use their new skills in their personal lives.
CORE Consulting Corporation Kirsten Barrera | Phillip Cook | Lindsey Owens | Freddi Rokaw
Purdue University
16.2.d Module 4 Collaborating in Google+ Context for learner 1: instruction was delivered in a home setting with the learner utilizing a laptop computer. Facilitator served as a group member during collaborative session. For learner 2: instruction was delivered in a classroom setting utilizing laptop computers. Learner completed collaborative session with facilitator serving as a group member during collaboration, and instructor during the beginning of instruction. In both situations, collaboration was limited by group size. Procedure: o Instruction for both learners began with an overview of the module. Facilitator allowed learners to review all materials and ask questions related to the content. o Learners viewed the screencast video with the facilitator. o For the collaborative portion of instruction, learners went to remote locations (learner 1: another location within the home; learner 2: another room within the building). Facilitator acted as group member. Both learners completed the task serving multiple roles (limited participants required learners to be recorders as well as evaluators). o At the conclusion of the collaborative session, learners rejoined facilitator for debriefing session. o Facilitator responded to questions regarding instruction. o Facilitator administered post-module evaluation and team evaluation. o Learners were dismissed and thanked for their willingness to provide feedback and insight on module 4.
Purdue University
o Feedback: I needed every bit of the instruction. I would say walking through the steps helped me the most. I liked being able to see what I needed to do. The job aid document helped a lot when I was actually setting up the account. I wish you would have told me about the job aid so I wouldnt have taken notes. I could have paid more attention to the demonstration. Neither learner felt the interruption had an impact on the instruction. Neither learner needed the individual objective assessments because they were able to successfully complete the goal.
16.3.b
Module
2
Sharing
in
Google+
Learner
1:
o Was
provided
guided
help
through
initial
setup
of
Google+
profile.
There
were
no
challenges
during
this
step
and
successfully
completed
profile
in
less
than
5
minutes.
o Opted
to
review
the
social
media
reference
guide
prior
to
taking
the
entry
skills
quiz.
Scored
100%
on
the
social
media
etiquette
entry
quiz
on
first
try.
Mentioned
that
the
quiz
was
very
easy
and
would
be
hard
to
imagine
getting
these
questions
wrong,
most
were
common
sense.
o Took
approximately
25
minutes
to
complete
the
Sharing
workshop
module
including
each
of
the
recommended
learning
activities.
Systematically
proceeded
through
each
slide
reading
the
steps,
watching
the
video
and
completing
the
hands-on
activity
in
recommended
order.
Did
not
have
any
difficulty
with
the
instruction
but
mentioned
it
would
be
easier
to
have
a
side
by
side
screen
setup
so
that
she
didnt
have
to
keep
jumping
back
and
forth
between
browser
tabs
to
see
the
videos/screenshots
next
to
her
own
profile.
o Provided
feedback
that
the
instruction
was
helpful
and
appropriate
for
her
level
of
skill.
Learner
2:
o Was
logged
into
Google+
profile
before
evaluation
began,
started
clicking
around
the
screen
and
selection
menu
options
prior
to
instruction.
o Opted
to
take
the
entry
quiz
without
reviewing
the
social
media
etiquette
reference
guide.
Scored
100%
on
first
try.
Quickly
skimmed
the
reference
guide
slides
after
completing
the
quiz
but
did
not
make
any
comments.
o Took
less
than
15
minutes
to
complete
the
Sharing
workshop
module
including
each
of
the
recommended
learning
activities.
Navigated
through
each
of
the
slides
and
videos
before
applying
what
he
learned
to
his
own
profile.
Flipped
through
the
slides
very
quickly
and
was
CORE Consulting Corporation Kirsten Barrera | Phillip Cook | Lindsey Owens | Freddi Rokaw Page 41 September 17, 2012
Purdue University
able to successful complete each of the learning activities at the end of the instruction. o Provided feedback that he usually learns new applications by trial and error and prefers to learn with a reference guide available that he can search through keywords and reference when needed (instead of watching videos that he could have figured out himself). 16.3.c Module 3 Creating a Hangout event in Google + Learner 1: o Took the Technology Readiness Survey and proved to be technically prepared for instruction. o Was happy to have a personal copy of the Quick Reference Guide for use later on. It reduced the responsibility and potential of cognitive overload of having to remember steps along the way. o Caught on very quickly and was very inquisitive about the process. Also shared his excitement with Learner 2. o Expected to be using Google+ frequently for personal use in the future. o Gave feedback willingly without prompting and was very excited about the process. o Thought the Final Test was not relevant for his purposes of learning. Learner 2: o Took the Technology Readiness Survey and proved to be technically prepared for instruction. o Was happy to collaborate with Learner 1 by helping him through some difficulties. o Thought the Final Test was too long for such a simple lesson. o Gave feedback willingly. o An interesting discussion arose between Learner 2 and the instructor comparing and contrasting Skype with Google+. o Does not expect to be using Google+ hangouts in the future, as Skype is a more familiar practice for her and works perfectly well. o She acknowledged that she will use this instruction to share with others in her job and use it as an option for her customers that do now want to use Skype or who already have a Google+ profile. Both learners were frustrated at first because the Internet connection was too slow for instruction. Collection Worksheet handout was not used, as there were only two learners. They were both shown the form and thought it might be handy for use in a classroom with many participants.
CORE Consulting Corporation Kirsten Barrera | Phillip Cook | Lindsey Owens | Freddi Rokaw
Purdue University
While waiting for his computer to catch up, the instructor had a discussion about how Google+ hangouts work. The motivational video was not shown, as it would interfere with the Internet bandwidth at that time. Discussion provided the necessary motivation instead. Both Learners commented that the instruction was informative and useful. Total time for instruction was less than 30 minutes. Both learners had fun hanging out with each other following the lesson. They tried some of the fun effects and options available in Google+.
16.3.d Module 4 Collaborating in Google+ Learner 1: o Skimmed activity sheet at beginning of activity. Instruction was interrupted once for a business call that learner had to take during the introductory description of the module. o Collaboration during Google+ hangout was hindered by learners unfamiliarity with the context of the lab activity and related lab data. o Seemed frequently frustrated by unfamiliarity with contextual materials used to complete the collaborative session. o With only one fellow collaborator, filling out the team evaluation was, Not very useful with a group size less than three. Learner 2: o Reviewed activity sheet and related lab handout and data via paper copies provided by facilitator. Prior to beginning the collaborative session, learner asked questions related to prior lab activity for clarification. Facilitator described prior context of lab and the student experience with the material. o Collaboration during Google+ hangout involved several instances where facilitator directed learner. Examples included: sharing a document using Google Docs, using the screenshare option, and accessing the hangout notes during the session. o Completed the post and team evaluations, noting that he would have students complete the post-module evaluation before leaving class, but would have the team evaluation completed at night prior to the next days instruction. Both learners suggested the creation of screencasts related to the specific features of a Google+ Hangout that they used most frequently (screenshare, document sharing and hangout notes)
CORE Consulting Corporation Kirsten Barrera | Phillip Cook | Lindsey Owens | Freddi Rokaw
Purdue University
CORE Consulting Corporation Kirsten Barrera | Phillip Cook | Lindsey Owens | Freddi Rokaw
Purdue University
Appendix
Figure
1.2:
Workshop
Workflow
CORE Consulting Corporation Kirsten Barrera | Phillip Cook | Lindsey Owens | Freddi Rokaw
Purdue University
CORE Consulting Corporation Kirsten Barrera | Phillip Cook | Lindsey Owens | Freddi Rokaw
Create a customized profile (using their school administered email address) with appropriate settings and controls, join Use appropriate social media sharing etiquette by posting messages to Google+ that are
Module 4: Collaboration
Page 46
Purdue University
CORE Consulting Corporation Kirsten Barrera | Phillip Cook | Lindsey Owens | Freddi Rokaw Page 47 September 17, 2012
Purdue University
CORE Consulting Corporation Kirsten Barrera | Phillip Cook | Lindsey Owens | Freddi Rokaw
Purdue University
CORE Consulting Corporation Kirsten Barrera | Phillip Cook | Lindsey Owens | Freddi Rokaw Page 49 September 17, 2012
Purdue University
CORE Consulting Corporation Kirsten Barrera | Phillip Cook | Lindsey Owens | Freddi Rokaw Page 50 September 17, 2012
Purdue University
CORE Consulting Corporation Kirsten Barrera | Phillip Cook | Lindsey Owens | Freddi Rokaw Page 51 September 17, 2012
Purdue University
CORE Consulting Corporation Kirsten Barrera | Phillip Cook | Lindsey Owens | Freddi Rokaw
Purdue University
Purdue University
Upload a picture that is Honor Code appropriate Enter personal information in accordance with school code Check school administered email for profile confirmation Watch tutorials Set specific privacy settings o Click the About Profile pushbutton under the About Section. o Enter data by typing school-required information. Set contact settings o Click the Edit Profile pushbutton then click the Change Contact Settings pushbutton on the About Profile page. o Set contact settings based on how they wish to be contacted by other Google+ members.
CORE Consulting Corporation Kirsten Barrera | Phillip Cook | Lindsey Owens | Freddi Rokaw
Purdue University
CORE Consulting Corporation Kirsten Barrera | Phillip Cook | Lindsey Owens | Freddi Rokaw
Purdue University
CORE Consulting Corporation Kirsten Barrera | Phillip Cook | Lindsey Owens | Freddi Rokaw
Purdue University
Figure
10.2a
Entry
Skills
Quiz
&
Social
Media
Etiquette
Reference
Guide
(view
interactive
web
version)
CORE Consulting Corporation Kirsten Barrera | Phillip Cook | Lindsey Owens | Freddi Rokaw
Purdue University
CORE Consulting Corporation Kirsten Barrera | Phillip Cook | Lindsey Owens | Freddi Rokaw
Purdue University
CORE Consulting Corporation Kirsten Barrera | Phillip Cook | Lindsey Owens | Freddi Rokaw
Purdue University
CORE Consulting Corporation Kirsten Barrera | Phillip Cook | Lindsey Owens | Freddi Rokaw
Purdue University
CORE Consulting Corporation Kirsten Barrera | Phillip Cook | Lindsey Owens | Freddi Rokaw
Purdue University
CORE Consulting Corporation Kirsten Barrera | Phillip Cook | Lindsey Owens | Freddi Rokaw
Purdue University
Notes / Comments
Page 63 September 17, 2012
Purdue University
Is caption free from spelling / grammatical errors? Is video relevant to course activities? Does video follow schools code of conduct policies? Sharing: Posting URLs Does the link work? Does the link include a caption? Is caption free from spelling / grammatical errors? Is it a unique resource that has not already been posted? Is the website relevant to course activities? Does the website follow schools code of conduct policies? Sharing: Setting Post Permissions Does a minimum of one post have sharing disabled? Does a minimum of one post have comments locked? Is there at least one post that is visible to a select circle? Events: Creating a Hangout Event Has student correctly identified the date for a hangout that is 3-7 days prior to test date? Has student correctly created an online event? Was a hangout event initiated for 3 or more people? Was an invitation sent to 3 or more classmates? Collaboration: Creating a Hangout Event Was at a minimum of 1 collaboration session held? Were goals of the collaborative session clearly defined? Were the results/outcome of the collaboration session written and distributed to classmates?
CORE Consulting Corporation Kirsten Barrera | Phillip Cook | Lindsey Owens | Freddi Rokaw
No No No No
Page 64 September 17, 2012
Purdue University
Was adequate feedback provided with recommendations for future collaboration sessions?
CORE Consulting Corporation Kirsten Barrera | Phillip Cook | Lindsey Owens | Freddi Rokaw
Purdue University
CORE Consulting Corporation Kirsten Barrera | Phillip Cook | Lindsey Owens | Freddi Rokaw Page 66 September 17, 2012
Purdue University
CORE Consulting Corporation Kirsten Barrera | Phillip Cook | Lindsey Owens | Freddi Rokaw
Purdue University
Notes / Comments
CORE Consulting Corporation Kirsten Barrera | Phillip Cook | Lindsey Owens | Freddi Rokaw
Purdue University
CORE Consulting Corporation Kirsten Barrera | Phillip Cook | Lindsey Owens | Freddi Rokaw Page 69 September 17, 2012
Purdue University
CORE Consulting Corporation Kirsten Barrera | Phillip Cook | Lindsey Owens | Freddi Rokaw
Purdue University
CORE Consulting Corporation Kirsten Barrera | Phillip Cook | Lindsey Owens | Freddi Rokaw
Purdue University
CORE Consulting Corporation Kirsten Barrera | Phillip Cook | Lindsey Owens | Freddi Rokaw
Purdue University
CORE Consulting Corporation Kirsten Barrera | Phillip Cook | Lindsey Owens | Freddi Rokaw
Purdue University
CORE Consulting Corporation Kirsten Barrera | Phillip Cook | Lindsey Owens | Freddi Rokaw
Purdue University
CORE Consulting Corporation Kirsten Barrera | Phillip Cook | Lindsey Owens | Freddi Rokaw
Purdue University
CORE Consulting Corporation Kirsten Barrera | Phillip Cook | Lindsey Owens | Freddi Rokaw
Purdue University
CORE Consulting Corporation Kirsten Barrera | Phillip Cook | Lindsey Owens | Freddi Rokaw
Purdue University
CORE Consulting Corporation Kirsten Barrera | Phillip Cook | Lindsey Owens | Freddi Rokaw
Purdue University
CORE Consulting Corporation Kirsten Barrera | Phillip Cook | Lindsey Owens | Freddi Rokaw
Purdue University
CORE Consulting Corporation Kirsten Barrera | Phillip Cook | Lindsey Owens | Freddi Rokaw
Purdue University
Figure 15.4.2 Group Roles Module 4: Collaboration Group Roles Before you begin a Module 4 activity, assign one of the following roles to each person in your group. While everyone should contribute to answering questions, each person also has a specialized role. Do your best to fulfill the role assigned to you; your group members are depending on you! Group Leader Actively participates in the activity Keeps the group on task Distributes work and assigns responsibilities to group members Resolves disputes between group members Assures all members participate and understand the activity Group Recorder Actively participates in the activity Keeps an accurate record of all answers, especially during discussions with the entire class Presenter Actively participates in the activity Represents views and conclusions held by the majority of the group and presents them to the class Evaluator Actively participates in the activity Evaluates group dynamics and evaluates the activity itself Prepares the final written evaluation of the group and activity Represents views and conclusions held by the majority of the group and presents them to the class
CORE Consulting Corporation Kirsten Barrera | Phillip Cook | Lindsey Owens | Freddi Rokaw
Purdue University
82
Purdue University
83
Purdue University
84
Purdue University
85
Purdue University
Module
4:
Collaboration
Glass
Fragments
Student
Data
A
group
comprised
of
four
students
(Jill,
Peter,
Paul
and
Mary)
submitted
the
data
below.
For
clarity,
the
data
has
been
broken
down
by
student.
Jills
Data
Notes:
Three
samples
of
the
unknown
were
measured.
Sample
Mass
(g)
Volume
(mL)
1
5.78
2.6
2
98.40
43.2
3
22.18
9.9
Peters
Data
Notes:
I
accidentally
lost
my
original
data,
but
I
have
this
plot
that
I
made
using
the
four
samples
that
I
measured.
Based on Active Chemistry: Forensics
86
Purdue University
Marys Data Notes: Ive included data from my three samples as well as a graph that I made using the data.
Pauls Data Notes: Five samples of the unknown were measured. Volume was measured using the displacement method. Sample Mass (g) Initial Vol (mL) Final Vol (mL) Volume (mL) 1 40.10 20.5 38.7 18.2 2 66.42 20.0 48.9 28.9 3 55.03 20.5 45.5 25.0 4 48.90 20.0 40.4 20.4 5 50.25 20.0 41.8 21.8
87
Purdue University
88
Purdue University
89
Purdue University
References
Dick,
W.,
Carey,
L.,
&
&
Carey,
J.
O.
(2009).
The
systematic
design
of
instruction
(7th
ed.).
Upper
Saddle
River,
NJ:
Pearson.
Google
Plus
Introduction
Video
-
What
is
Google
Plus?
.
(2011,
July
9).
Retrieved
July
28,
2012,
from
You
Tube:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3T7N2_0WrPM
Google+.
(n.d.).
Retrieved
July
20,
2012,
from
Google+:
https://plus.google.com/
Rokaw,
F.
(2012).
Initial
Analysis
Report.
Purdue
University.
Burbank:
None.
Rokaw,
F.
(2012).
Objectives
and
Assessment
Report.
Purdue
University.
Burbank:
None.
The
White
House.
(n.d.).
Retrieved
July
20,
2012,
from
The
White
House
President
Barak
Obama:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/photos-and-
video/video/2012/01/30/president-obama-s-google-hangout
The
White
House.
(2012,
January
30).
Retrieved
August
15,
2012,
from
President
Obama's
Google
Hangout:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/photos-and- video/video/2012/01/30/president-obama-s-google-hangout
90