Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
region? Assume that the sun is a blackbody. (Hint: You may need a table of the integral
values of the Planck function.)
1.0 exp+08
5800 °K, with peak at 0.5µm
8.86 exp+07
5.54 exp+02
0.1µm
0.4µm
Figure 1: Emitted energy (shaded area) between 0.1 – 0.4 µm of the Sun falling within the UV region. The y-axis
is the energy per unit wavelength (Wm^2) and values, in this case, were calculated.
The principles provided by Stefan-Boltzmann, with the utilization of Planck’s function,
stating that the emissive power of a blackbody is a product of the wavelength (λ) and the
temperature (T), can be utilized to compute fractional regions under the curve.
Solution 1:
Considering 0.40µm, the equivalent fractional energy using integral values of Planck’s
function is:
λΤ = 0.40 (5800) = 2330 µmK [emissive power of the given blackbody at the given
wavelength]
2200 - 0.10089
2320 - FE
2400 - 0.14026
Solution 2:
Instead of 0 to 0.40 µm, the fractional energy can also be computed in a wavelength interval,
as in this case, 0.1 to 0.4 µm.
Considering 0.1µm, the equivalent fractional energy using integral values of Planck’s function
is:
λΤ = 0.10 (5800) = 580 µmK [emissive power of the given blackbody at the given
wavelength]
From the table of integral values, the closest Fractional Energy (FE) equivalent is
9.29exp-08, a very minimal effect yet necessary to show that the area bounded by the
UV doesn’t start at a zero wavelength but at 0.1µm.
Therefore, the total power radiated by the sun in the ultra violet spectral region is:
FE = 0.124512 - 9.29exp-08 = 0.124503 or 12.4503 %
Solution 3:
The shaded area bounded by the curve and the x-axis can be analyzed using basic integral
calculus. The equation of the curve can be taken from the equation of the parabola (more
specific) or the equation of a line (less specific). Note that the differences of values of the
“fractional energy” derived using any of the equation mentioned is negligible, due to the
nature of the curve that abruptly changes the slope from the peak going downwards.
Parabolic Analysis (please refer to figure 1 for the values):
( y −k) = − ( x − h)
2
---- Equation of a parabola
4P
Substituting values to the equation to solve for P:
( x − 0.5) 2
( y − 100000000) = −
4 P
P = 2.193exp-10
Please refer to figure 1 for visual aid in the computation of the area bounded by a parabolic
curve on top, a line with x = 0.1 on the left, a line with x = 0.4 on the right, and the x-axis at
the bottom.
Consider a vertical differential element with differential area = Ldx = ydx. This element has
to be integrated from limits 0.1 to 0.4 to compute the bounded area.
0.4
A = ∫ (−(11.40 exp+ 8) x 2 + (11.40 exp+ 8) x − 1.85 exp+ 8)dx
0.1
Integrating will lead to: A = 7exp+6 [shaded area bounded within the UV range]
This value has to be compared to the total radiation emitted by the blackbody (sun) which is
approximated to be 64 million Wm^-2.
Conclusion:
The differences in fractional energy (FE) values are attributed to the underlying processes of
each method and the assumptions that the equations used may be derived or based from. This
researcher cannot pinpoint which method exactly defines or is closest to the “real” FE or the
area bounded by the UV region. It is with assurance, however, that the values were computed
with mathematical explanations behind each.
References:
Helbling, E. W., Virginia villafane, Martha Ferrario, Osmund Holm-Hansen. 1992. Impact of
natural ultraviolet radiation on rates of photosynthesis and on specific marine phytoplankton
species. Marine Ecology Progress Series, Vol. 80: 89-100
Madronich, S., R.L. McKenzie, L.O. Bjo¨rn, M.M. Caldwell. 1998. Changes in biologically
active ultraviolet radiation reaching the Earth’s surface. Journal of Photochemistry and
Photobiology B: Biology 46, 5–19
Book:
Siegel, Robert and Howell, John. 2002. Thermal Radiation Heat Transfer. New York, NY;
Taylor and Francis.