Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
10-03-** 10:46
******************************************
*
XSTABL
*
*
*
*
Slope Stability Analysis
*
*
using the
*
*
Method of Slices
*
*
*
*
Copyright (C) 1992 97
*
* Interactive Software Designs, Inc. *
*
Moscow, ID 83843, U.S.A.
*
*
*
*
All Rights Reserved
*
*
*
* Ver. 5.202
96 1599 *
******************************************
.0 20.0
7.0 20.0
9.0 21.0
16.0 21.0
18.0 20.0
7.0 20.0
9.0 21.0
16.0 21.0
18.0 20.0
25.0 20.0
1
2
2
2
1
.0
.0
20.0
16.0
25.0
25.0
20.0
16.0
1
3
3
4
.0
.0
12.0
9.0
25.0
25.0
12.0
9.0
4
5
19.0
19.0
19.0
19.0
19.0
19.0
19.0
19.0
19.0
19.0
35.0
.0
35.0
55.0
55.0
30.00 .000
30.00 .000
30.00 .000
30.00 .000
30.00 .000
.0 1
.0 0
.0 1
.0 1
.0 1
--------------BOUNDARY LOADS
--------------1 load(s) specified
Load
No.
1
x-left
(m)
9.0
16.0
10.0
.0
4.0 m
9.0 m
--------------------ANGULAR RESTRICTIONS
--------------------The first segment of each failure surface will be inclined
within the angular range defined by :
Lower angular limit := -45.0 degrees
Upper angular limit := (slope angle - 5.0) degrees
*************************************************************
** Factor of safety calculation for surface # 16 **
** failed to converge within FIFTY iterations
**
**
**
** The last calculated value of the FOS was 21.5683 **
** This will be ignored for final summary of results **
*************************************************************
*************************************************************
** Factor of safety calculation for surface # 86 **
** failed to converge within FIFTY iterations
**
**
**
*************************************************************
** Factor of safety calculation for surface # 87 **
** failed to converge within FIFTY iterations
**
**
**
** The last calculated value of the FOS was 39.7509 **
** This will be ignored for final summary of results **
*************************************************************
*************************************************************
** Factor of safety calculation for surface # 89 **
** failed to converge within FIFTY iterations
**
**
**
** The last calculated value of the FOS was 33.0343 **
** This will be ignored for final summary of results **
*************************************************************
*************************************************************
** Factor of safety calculation for surface # 91 **
** failed to converge within FIFTY iterations
**
**
**
** The last calculated value of the FOS was********* **
** This will be ignored for final summary of results **
*************************************************************
*************************************************************
** Factor of safety calculation for surface # 92 **
** failed to converge within FIFTY iterations
**
**
**
** The last calculated value of the FOS was-328.9615 **
** This will be ignored for final summary of results **
*************************************************************
*************************************************************
** Factor of safety calculation for surface # 93 **
** failed to converge within FIFTY iterations
**
**
**
** The last calculated value of the FOS was********* **
** This will be ignored for final summary of results **
*************************************************************
*************************************************************
** Factor of safety calculation for surface # 94 **
** failed to converge within FIFTY iterations
**
**
**
** The last calculated value of the FOS was********* **
** This will be ignored for final summary of results **
*************************************************************
*************************************************************
** Factor of safety calculation for surface # 95 **
** failed to converge within FIFTY iterations
**
**
**
** The last calculated value of the FOS was -28.7560 **
** This will be ignored for final summary of results **
*************************************************************
************************************************************************
ERROR # 28
************************************************************************
In automatically generating a failure surface, it has been found that
more than 100 points are needed to define this surface. The program
is limited to a maximum of 100 points. To meet this criterion,
please INCREASE the specified length of the line segments.
************************************************************************
**************************************************
*** The above error occurred in attempting ***
*** to generate surface # 6 from the ***
*** initiation point located at x = 9.00 ***
**************************************************
x-surf
(m)
y-surf
(m)
1
2
3
7.89
8.82
9.14
20.44
20.80
21.00
********************************************************************
**
**
** Out of the 95 surfaces generated and analyzed by XSTABL, **
**
9 surfaces were found to have MISLEADING FOS values. **
**
**
********************************************************************
1.083
1.158
3.430
3.541
3.802
4.149
4.511
4.545
6.444
6.649
7.19
7.04
9.36
7.32
8.39
.99
9.45
9.43
8.03
8.53
23.71
23.05
22.48
33.92
32.07
86.84
23.17
22.11
23.44
21.64
3.34
2.90
2.51
13.25
11.63
66.75
2.65
1.70
3.66
1.90
* * * END OF FILE * * *
7.89
7.33
7.89
8.44
7.89
7.89
8.44
8.44
6.78
7.33
9.14 4.988E+00
9.09 7.210E+00
11.37 1.037E+02
10.24 1.222E+02
11.96 3.629E+02
11.99 1.803E+03
10.89 5.194E+01
10.62 3.349E+01
10.72 4.567E+02
10.26 1.873E+02
10-03-** 10:45
******************************************
*
XSTABL
*
*
*
*
Slope Stability Analysis
*
*
using the
*
*
Method of Slices
*
*
*
*
Copyright (C) 1992 97
*
* Interactive Software Designs, Inc. *
*
Moscow, ID 83843, U.S.A.
*
*
*
*
All Rights Reserved
*
*
*
* Ver. 5.202
96 1599 *
******************************************
.0 20.0
7.0 20.0
9.0 21.0
16.0 21.0
18.0 20.0
7.0 20.0
9.0 21.0
16.0 21.0
18.0 20.0
25.0 20.0
1
2
2
2
1
.0
.0
20.0
16.0
25.0
25.0
20.0
16.0
1
3
3
4
.0
.0
12.0
9.0
25.0
25.0
12.0
9.0
4
5
19.0
19.0
19.0
19.0
19.0
19.0
19.0
19.0
19.0
19.0
35.0
.0
35.0
55.0
55.0
30.00 .000
30.00 .000
30.00 .000
30.00 .000
30.00 .000
.0 1
.0 0
.0 1
.0 1
.0 1
--------------BOUNDARY LOADS
--------------1 load(s) specified
Load
No.
1
x-left
(m)
9.0
16.0
10.0
.0
2.0 m
9.0 m
--------------------ANGULAR RESTRICTIONS
--------------------The first segment of each failure surface will be inclined
within the angular range defined by :
Lower angular limit := -45.0 degrees
Upper angular limit := (slope angle - 5.0) degrees
*************************************************************
** Factor of safety calculation for surface # 3 **
** failed to converge within FIFTY iterations
**
**
**
** The last calculated value of the FOS was 21.9257 **
** This will be ignored for final summary of results **
*************************************************************
*************************************************************
** Factor of safety calculation for surface # 85 **
** failed to converge within FIFTY iterations
**
**
**
*************************************************************
** Factor of safety calculation for surface # 86 **
** failed to converge within FIFTY iterations
**
**
**
** The last calculated value of the FOS was 29.3654 **
** This will be ignored for final summary of results **
*************************************************************
*************************************************************
** Factor of safety calculation for surface # 88 **
** failed to converge within FIFTY iterations
**
**
**
** The last calculated value of the FOS was 26.1345 **
** This will be ignored for final summary of results **
*************************************************************
*************************************************************
** Factor of safety calculation for surface # 89 **
** failed to converge within FIFTY iterations
**
**
**
** The last calculated value of the FOS was 21.4640 **
** This will be ignored for final summary of results **
*************************************************************
*************************************************************
** Factor of safety calculation for surface # 90 **
** failed to converge within FIFTY iterations
**
**
**
** The last calculated value of the FOS was 34.0795 **
** This will be ignored for final summary of results **
*************************************************************
*************************************************************
** Factor of safety calculation for surface # 91 **
** failed to converge within FIFTY iterations
**
**
**
** The last calculated value of the FOS was-328.9702 **
** This will be ignored for final summary of results **
*************************************************************
*************************************************************
** Factor of safety calculation for surface # 92 **
** failed to converge within FIFTY iterations
**
**
**
** The last calculated value of the FOS was********* **
** This will be ignored for final summary of results **
*************************************************************
*************************************************************
** Factor of safety calculation for surface # 93 **
** failed to converge within FIFTY iterations
**
**
**
** The last calculated value of the FOS was********* **
** This will be ignored for final summary of results **
*************************************************************
*************************************************************
** Factor of safety calculation for surface # 94 **
** failed to converge within FIFTY iterations
**
**
**
** The last calculated value of the FOS was -28.7588 **
** This will be ignored for final summary of results **
*************************************************************
************************************************************************
ERROR # 28
************************************************************************
In automatically generating a failure surface, it has been found that
more than 100 points are needed to define this surface. The program
is limited to a maximum of 100 points. To meet this criterion,
please INCREASE the specified length of the line segments.
************************************************************************
**************************************************
*** The above error occurred in attempting ***
*** to generate surface # 5 from the ***
*** initiation point located at x = 9.00 ***
**************************************************
x-surf
(m)
8.22
9.21
10.20
10.48
y-surf
(m)
20.61
20.73
20.92
21.00
********************************************************************
**
**
** Out of the 94 surfaces generated and analyzed by XSTABL, **
**
10 surfaces were found to have MISLEADING FOS values. **
**
**
********************************************************************
3.111
3.142
3.218
3.256
6.93
9.21
7.95
9.23
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
72.35
90.78
5.36
4.24
18.37
43.25
* * * END OF FILE * * *
7.44
7.44
6.67
8.22
7.44
7.44
12.87 2.930E+03
15.32 6.174E+03
10.89 5.684E+02
12.55 2.061E+02
15.79 1.800E+03
15.96 3.582E+03
10-03-** 10:33
******************************************
*
XSTABL
*
*
*
*
Slope Stability Analysis
*
*
using the
*
*
Method of Slices
*
*
*
*
Copyright (C) 1992 97
*
* Interactive Software Designs, Inc. *
*
Moscow, ID 83843, U.S.A.
*
*
*
*
All Rights Reserved
*
*
*
* Ver. 5.202
96 1599 *
******************************************
0
7
9
16
18
25
20
20
21
21
20
20
7
9
16
18
25
20
21
21
20
20
20
1
2
2
2
1
15
10
5
0
0
0
20
16
25
25
20
16
1
3
3
4
0
0
12
9
25
25
12
9
4
5
19.0
19.0
19.0
19.0
19.0
19.0
19.0
19.0
19.0
19.0
35.0
.0
35.0
55.0
55.0
30.00 .000
30.00 .000
30.00 .000
30.00 .000
30.00 .000
.0 1
.0 0
.0 1
.0 1
.0 1
--------------BOUNDARY LOADS
--------------1 load(s) specified
Load
No.
1
x-left
(m)
9.0
16.0
10.0
.0
.0 m
9.0 m
--------------------ANGULAR RESTRICTIONS
--------------------The first segment of each failure surface will be inclined
within the angular range defined by :
Lower angular limit := -45.0 degrees
Upper angular limit := (slope angle - 5.0) degrees
*************************************************************
** Factor of safety calculation for surface # 5 **
** failed to converge within FIFTY iterations
**
**
**
** The last calculated value of the FOS was 22.9940 **
** This will be ignored for final summary of results **
*************************************************************
*************************************************************
** Factor of safety calculation for surface # 7 **
** failed to converge within FIFTY iterations
**
**
**
*************************************************************
** Factor of safety calculation for surface # 19 **
** failed to converge within FIFTY iterations
**
**
**
** The last calculated value of the FOS was 22.6106 **
** This will be ignored for final summary of results **
*************************************************************
*************************************************************
** Factor of safety calculation for surface # 43 **
** failed to converge within FIFTY iterations
**
**
**
** The last calculated value of the FOS was 20.8279 **
** This will be ignored for final summary of results **
*************************************************************
*************************************************************
** Factor of safety calculation for surface # 84 **
** failed to converge within FIFTY iterations
**
**
**
** The last calculated value of the FOS was 32.1454 **
** This will be ignored for final summary of results **
*************************************************************
*************************************************************
** Factor of safety calculation for surface # 85 **
** failed to converge within FIFTY iterations
**
**
**
** The last calculated value of the FOS was 24.8527 **
** This will be ignored for final summary of results **
*************************************************************
*************************************************************
** Factor of safety calculation for surface # 87 **
** failed to converge within FIFTY iterations
**
**
**
** The last calculated value of the FOS was 21.8046 **
** This will be ignored for final summary of results **
*************************************************************
*************************************************************
** Factor of safety calculation for surface # 88 **
** failed to converge within FIFTY iterations
**
**
**
** The last calculated value of the FOS was 21.0612 **
** This will be ignored for final summary of results **
*************************************************************
*************************************************************
** Factor of safety calculation for surface # 89 **
** failed to converge within FIFTY iterations
**
**
**
** The last calculated value of the FOS was 28.2409 **
** This will be ignored for final summary of results **
*************************************************************
*************************************************************
** Factor of safety calculation for surface # 91 **
** failed to converge within FIFTY iterations
**
**
**
** The last calculated value of the FOS was 61.1774 **
** This will be ignored for final summary of results **
*************************************************************
*************************************************************
** Factor of safety calculation for surface # 96 **
** failed to converge within FIFTY iterations
**
**
**
** The last calculated value of the FOS was1358.0860 **
** This will be ignored for final summary of results **
*************************************************************
*************************************************************
** Factor of safety calculation for surface # 97 **
** failed to converge within FIFTY iterations
**
**
**
** The last calculated value of the FOS was 64.5899 **
*************************************************************
** Factor of safety calculation for surface # 98 **
** failed to converge within FIFTY iterations
**
**
**
** The last calculated value of the FOS was -62.1390 **
** This will be ignored for final summary of results **
*************************************************************
*************************************************************
** Factor of safety calculation for surface # 99 **
** failed to converge within FIFTY iterations
**
**
**
** The last calculated value of the FOS was -65.7653 **
** This will be ignored for final summary of results **
*************************************************************
Point
No.
1
2
3
x-surf
(m)
9.00
9.96
10.70
y-surf
(m)
21.00
20.73
21.00
********************************************************************
**
**
** Out of the 100 surfaces generated and analyzed by XSTABL, **
**
14 surfaces were found to have MISLEADING FOS values. **
**
**
********************************************************************
.833
1.482
2.494
2.802
3.985
4.259
4.853
4.888
5.022
5.117
9.85
10.24
9.03
6.71
-3.64
10.37
3.43
7.50
9.94
7.38
22.18
21.67
22.01
35.04
119.89
22.00
87.35
32.74
24.51
57.44
* * * END OF FILE * * *
Series1
Series2
0
25
10
20
20
15
20
25
30
0
25
16
16
0
25
12
12
0
25
9
9
RUN 1
No
CIRCLE CENTER
x-Coordinat (m)
y-Coordinat (m)
Radius (m) Initial x-Coordinat (m)
9.85
22.18
1.45
9
10.24
21.67
1.41
9
9.03
22.01
1.83
8
6.71
35.04
14.59
8
-3.64
119.89
100.46
7
10.37
22
1.7
9
3.43
87.35
67.44
7
7.5
32.74
12.75
7
9.94
24.51
4.45
8
7.38
57.44
37.44
7
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
FOS (BISHOP)
0.833
1.482
2.494
2.802
3.985
4.259
4.853
4.888
5.022
5.117
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
CIRCLE CENTER
FOS (BISHOP)
x-Coordinat (m)
y-Coordinat (m)
Radius (m) Initial x-Coordinat (m)
3.111
6.93
35.15
14.59
8.22
3.142
9.21
22
1.71
8.22
3.218
7.95
32.3
12.09
7.44
3.256
9.23
23.06
2.64
8.22
3.934
-0.08
92.18
72.35
7.44
5.791
2.47
110.86
90.78
7.44
6.085
7.68
25.26
5.36
6.67
6.096
10.09
24.42
4.24
8.22
6.222
9.97
38.42
18.37
7.44
6.289
7.8
63.47
43.25
7.44
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
CIRCLE CENTER
FOS (BISHOP)
x-Coordinat (m)
y-Coordinat (m)
Radius (m) Initial x-Coordinat (m)
1.083
7.19
23.71
3.34
7.89
1.158
7.04
23.05
2.9
7.33
3.43
9.36
22.48
2.51
7.89
3.451
7.32
33.92
13.25
8.44
3.802
8.39
32.07
11.63
7.89
4.149
0.99
86.84
66.75
7.89
4.511
9.45
23.17
2.65
8.44
4.545
9.43
22.11
1.7
8.44
6.444
8.03
23.44
3.66
6.78
RUN2
No
RUN 3
No
10
6.649
8.53
21.64
1.9
7.33
10.26
187.30
JUGA
YA TAHU
NGSORAN
GAN NILAI