BEFORE HONOUR;\BLECENTRAL COMMISS+ I

PETITION UNDER SECTION 19(3) OF RIGHT TO INFORMAnON ACT \

. .
Petitioner
. Subhash Chandra Agrawal
1775 KuchaLattushah
Dariba"Chandni Chowk .
DeJhi-ll0006

Shri MTBaig
Asstt Commissioner of Security (CA} & CPIO
Bureau of Civil. Aviation.Security
(Union MrnistryofCivilAviatioti}.
'A' Wing, Janpath Bhawan
Janpath,NewDelhi-l10091
'Appellate Authority under RTTAct
Bureau'ofCivil Aviation Security
Civil 'Aviation).
'A' Wing; Janpath Bhawan
Janpath, New Delhi-l10001
Shri Girish Kumar
Director (VS). &. CPI 0
Union ':Airiistry.6fBome Affairs (MBA}
(PPDivisibL} .
NDCC-lI Building, 3
rd
floor
JaisinghRoad, NewDelhi-lI 0001
Shri Lokesh Dutt Jha
-Joint.secrctarytj'P]' &AppellateAuthority
Union Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA)
c3
rd
floor,:NDCC-IJ Building, JaisinghRoad
NewDelhi-ll 0003
&
,... " I I'
I I
1
I
I
__ ,I }
,.. - j
'"'.
/r . ----
//.'

,'/'
. /;:/'
.
I'
. ",,'i
/-:;:?";',-; / "
.1 ,,;.: / : I '::!:'. '.
r (" " . '1)i
i _';I ,\\f\ t $/) ,1
9-,\ I"'j -
"."--- ; /"" 'I '\f"/l
, " : ',.::,---J_"- .:i....----- /. r
:" '. ,;,.,',.\0'/', J
:, j; -::()\.:",:,,'\,':.:.f . j
I
l
l.U-VII ....... UIL\..J.JIII<;l-l)VJI.XJl.J.l ....... \.IL
I> ;
I
, I
DGCA !
I
I
'j'
Technical Area
i
Opposite Safdarjang Airport
-I
!
NewDelhi-ll0003 I
I
I
i
f f".
<!
, I I.
j i!
i
Brief Facts & Prayer ,:!
I vide myRTI petition dated 30.07.2012 addressed to Airports 6fJndia!CA::AI)]sought
, ; i j',.. I
completeand detailed information together with related
, ,I
etc on each of under-mentioned aspects also relating to Airbus for
'1 -; - .' \ ,r' ;,
Vadra to fly' (TNN 17.10.2008) and a copy of display-board providing exemption frdm pre
, ,I,
i
embarkation security-checks: ! I- - f
I I
I I
I, "
, I'
1. Is it true that-some order AVSEC order No. 06/2oo9
w
ls:eyer, issued ekemptihg also'
, ,i ' I"
private individuals His Holiness the Dalai Lama aridShriaovert Vadhera
, "I, . I " i
from pre-embarkationsecurity-checks apart from listed other authorities-on ipost? i
, " , "',. ", " ' " . ! '". " i, ,i .
2; Copy-ofthesaid AVSEC order No. 06/2009 as referred III Iquery(l} .together.with
',' 'i, I
) .' .'" ,', _ l I j
complete and detailed information together with related documents/correspondence/file
, , " ',' , . [ i I
notings etc on draftingthe said AVSEC order No. 06/2009 t 'i f'
- I 'j
3. Copy etc on in!c\usionofptivdte,indiriduals
, I I'"
His Holiness the Dalai Lama andShri Rovert Vadhera.twith his wife)in't*e
< ' ';1 ' i
exempted from pre-embarkationsecurity-checks i
,
I 'f '
1 j I
4. Is the said AVSEC order No. 06/2009 still in force as at present? 1.; 1
I I
5. Are some more individual persons added to the list dfthose exempted from pre
. -' - . -' " ,:::, I" 1
embarkation security-checks after issue ofthe said AVSECJorderNo. 06/2Q097 ,I
< _. ,,,. ': ' " ,r ,',-.: 1,,".!
6. If yes, please name theindividual persons added to the list of these.exempted frompre
I j _ ) ,
embarkation security-checks' after issue of the said AVSE order No, 06/*09,
, , , ! I I
also copies of all orders, in this regard issued 'after the said orderNo.06/*09c)ll
i ! f
the aspect of exempting pre-embarkation security-checks I I f'
7. Is it truethat .an Airbus had to be towed awaybypas :nt norms forfacI)itating!a test
, I I'
flightby Shri Rovert Vadhera as referred in enclosednews-report? i
, , ' ' ,. j "I
8. If yes,please provide complete and detailed information togethef wijbrelatedflte
, ! I I
notings/docUI:nents7correspondence etc on such out-of-norms towing awaYof.Aitbusto
i I I
faciIitatean individual (Shri Revert Vadhera) i 'I, r'
9. Is it true that the then Union Civil Aviation.MinisterShri Prafulla.Patel at
. ., . 'j' , , .! . ,.1 <
time of such out-of-norms towing away of Airbus to facilitate an individual' (Shri !Roveii
Vadhera)? ' .,' I,' ,i . i '
. f "
I
i
. !
IV. L-UIlIfJIC;LC; dLlU UC;ldllC;U' III I UllllilllULI lUlo;C;lIlC;1 VVu.u IC;IULC;U "1UILC;:>PUIIUC;L1vC;/lfUvUIIIC;IIL:>/lIlC;
"'notings etc on role, if any, ofthe then Union Civil AviatiJnMinister"Shri!}raftilI
1a
Patel
, " ' " '! '! i
ion' Stich out-of-norms towing away of Airbus to facilitakan (Shr] [R6vert
! I i
Vadhera) , !:i I
\ :
11. Any'other relatedinformation.
i" L
,
12. File-notingscn rnovementof this RTI petition as well
:] i'
I [
. ;(
I" ,[
" !. '. I ..
Learned CPIO at Bureau of Civil AviationSecurity where petitionlwas rransferred' under section
6(3) ofRTI Act vide response No. CAS-7(35)/2010IDiv-I(RTI)dJted "
'. . _. _ it,,! !- . .
query (2) declined to provide copy of the sought AVSEC order Iand and [sought
. , ! ",...:--";,'; I', ';
documents classified as restricted 'documents relating to "Civi I iAviation Security" exempted
. . . ". -'" '_ J< _ ,:,._ !,' ." <:' _j, '>
under section 8(l)(a) of RTI Act. Butthe sought documentis not anysi!chdocument
. - .- ! i.--. .
because providing free and privileged access to some selected p'ersons including als8jcertaih
individuals without any security-checkcan never be information \\i;hichcould affect
- . - I .1
security or other aspects of the'state. i , ' '" i I;I
I
1 !
"
"f,
I i
i
1
,," . I,
Learned CPIO at MBA where also petition was transferred under] section p(3) of] RTI Apt vide
, ." [;.,;" ,'I !' '
response No, 23QI4/24!2012-VS dated 11.09.2012 provided a confused reply where on ope side
. " ' . ' .. [. " " ", .. 1: . ,.; ! .:, '
he observed that MBA may examine the matter relating to query '(3) of RTI petition in
. ."., j _ if: I. .
consultation with the Central Security Agencies, while on the he 'outright declined
',' . _. . i . .,' -, c,! .r";, l:- '>,' .
information on the same very query relatingto proposals for exemptingprivate individuals froni ,
' . , '. . i , '. '",' J" ,i '/', '
pre-embarkation security-checks as exempted under section 24( 1) of RTI Act befp're the
consultation-process as referred in the earlier part took place. I" i' r
, i
, .)
i I, j
t I't
Otherwise also sought information-and documents available w'th MHA cannot any
.' I:1- . _ '_ .f : ,.'
privileged exemption even under sectibn24(1) ofRTl Act because providing freeand prifileged
access to some selected persons including also certain individuals any
. , l : .,'1" [.
never be information which could prejudicially affectsecurity , ,'otheraspeds of the, or the
, 1[ [,
concerned ones. r i I'
I i
I I I
1 I
, i "', i I; i
I filed first appeals dated 03.09.2011 and 19.09.2012 respectively at Bureau of'::iv'il
. . .1 .'., -.). !
Security and MHA which were never responded by respective AppJllateautnoritiesl !
" . ' I' I J
. ' 'I, , I
. j Ii'
, , " "i," 1 I,
Bureau of Civil Aviation Security also transferred RTI petition tp CPIO at DGCC A' for !query
, I I
numbers (7) to (11), which never caredto respond to RTI petition. I' I
i I
, ,l I
I appeal various concerned public-authorities may .kindly bedirected to to
queries of my RTI petition but with sought and related documents now.to be
, 'i ii''
[ I'
if:
i ,
I r
I
I
I
I '
1
1
'-, /
in. any way endanger their personal security also. Thery, are
personalities of highest level. But even. are givien such
",-" >i' '. ':'." ',,' -'. " , , .: ' , I l' .'
privileged free access without any security-check at.airports.Queries of this RTI:
.'.. ,", ," "',, I ','., . !. '. i ' '.' [ >. -. j
surprised ar d great impropriety, and attract even provisions of-section, 8(2)
.' . I.. '!', :
provides access to information in case public-interest outweighs theharrp,Jo tile
, i
protected interests. It is prayed accordingly. I
Humbly submitted
\

'tYV'
SUBHASH CHANDRA AGRAWAL
' ' "',",'t, j
,
09.11.2012 I,
Verification. i I
I,Subhash Chandra Agrawal s/o late Shri Om Prakash and resident of
, I '
Dariba, Delhi-Ll 0006 verify that thefacts mentioned above are correct to best of
i 'f' .' _ ' r-'
.', .' : '. .' - ,

SUBHASH CHANDRA AGRAWAL
I 775 Kucha Lattushah
l?aribaDELlII I ]0006 (India)
Mobile 981003371] Fax 23254036
E-mail subhashmadhu(iv.sify.com .
09.11.2012
c.)t
Copiesenclosed:
RTlpevtion dated
CPIO (Civil aviation) reply dated
First Appeal (Civil Aviation) dated 03.09.20] 2

Appeal order {Civil Aviation) not received
CPIO (MBA) reply dated 11.09.2012
"c, . ).". " . ' , " i{:,'
'. First Appeal (MHA) ]9.09.2012
0 .,,'
Appeal order (MHA) riot received
.J,.L.""'U. J .... ..l. 1._ . ......... .J.."I ..LJ.L.J ..... >.,J-J........- .. " ........ '"" l -
'i
-:
,
!
Sir
I , , '
[ vide my RTIpetition dated 30.07.2012 addressed at Airports authority ofIndia (AAI) sought'
, .! ;
completearrddetailed. !nforrnationtogether with related
- I ' : .]
etc-on each of under-mentioned aspects also relating to towed .awayfor
, I ' .; ..!..,
fly',(TNN17.IO.2008)and acopy of display-boardkrovidiOg exemption from pre
,: - , ." I '. ,." i 'f .. ,'
embarkationsecurity-checks: !'
, , r
-, ,' .. ' " " , , .i. ,'1,
I. [sit true that some order AVSEC order No. 06/200<; was ever issued r exempting also
p;ivate individuals His Holiness the Dalai Lama and Shri wife)
from pre-embarkation security-checks-apart from listed' other authorities on '
l ;!
2. Copy of the said AVSEC order No. 0612009 as referred in query (I) above togetherwith
, '''' .. ';.' '.. -", i_ ,_ i '" '. :
complete and detailed information together with related: documents/correspondence/file
. , .. r .. : .. . , -, .: , -,:. ' . j-, ,
notings etc <?ndraftirigth
tl
saidAVSEC order No. 06120q9
3. Copy, of etc on of private
., ' ,"','.. , " .' ,'j,..' ". ,'J '
His Holiness the Dalai Lamaand Shri Rovert Vadhera (with his wife) in' the list of those
, ': ,. "J' '(,
. exempted from pre-embarkation security-checks .
'," .. .,.,- " ,
4. Is the said AVSEC order No. 06/2009 stillin force as at present'?
. .. _ .... ( f .., . [
5. Are some more individual persons added to the list! ofjhose exempted from pre
. ; i ,..;- r ." ..',.'-:i" - : ',' I.- '
embarkation security-checks after i;;ue of the said A order' No. 06/:2009?:
" '_.. ..... _.. .. l ,'.: . i .. I
6. If yes, please name the individual persons added to the list of those exempted from pre-
i , -; 'd.' '> -'., . - --- - :' '
embarkation security-checks after issue of the said AVSEC order No; 06/2009 enclosing
. - 1 j r
, /",,,",! , ",' ,J
also copies of all orders in this regard iSSLt.gCi after the said on
. " . , I -> ,"" --"'!:. t .
the aspect of exempting pre-embarkation.security-checks ,
. j , r: "
7. Is it true that an Airbus hadto be towed away bypassingnorms forfacilitating a test
: ,,- ,: ;.' '.r
flight by Shri Revert Vadhera as referred in enclosed news-report?
, . - _ - i" - . :: \ ,
8. If yes, please provide complete and detailed jnformation together with related file
, ' 'i "", .,' ':'
notings/documents/correspondenceetcon. such out-of-norms towing aWay of iAirhus to
, , " "",., t:'
I
facilitate an individual (Shri Rovert Vadhera)
t
i
,Jo 'UI,I'" LUa. Ull;i ..UU;;H'UIlIVIl':lVllr\.VlallU1F1VHIH1>lvl at
time of such out-of-normstowing away of Airbus to facilitate anindividual (ShriRovert
'f ;
i" .:
V dh
)?
, !
10., Complete and; detailed information together with related'
. ' . . . - l
notings etc, on role, if any,' of-the then Union Civil Aviati:on
. _ _' . ., . ,-"" '_L:. . ,:";' _. _._, ,1: -, _ .
on such out-of-norms towing away of Airbustofacilitate .an individual (Shri] Revert
Vadhera)'
11. Any other related information.
12. File-notingson movement of this RTlpetition as well
Learned CPIOat MHAwhere 'petitionwas transferred-under section 6(3) of"R:IT Act vide
: . I
. response No. 23014/24/2012-VS'dated n.09:2012 provided-a confused-reply where on side
he ooservect,tf.at MHA>rriay-examiiie-the Inattef relating toquefy'(3}ofRTL petltioI1in
, : -' !.
consultation with the Central Security Agencies, while on the outright declined
. " - j
informationon the same very query relating to proposals for exempting private individuals from
pre-embarkation security-checks as exempted underseetion 24(\!} ofRl1 Act the
' " _ _, " J .. j
as referred inthe earlier part took place. E', " :' '
i
I
. ." , _. . . . . " ,;-. .',. . ':, 1 \ . .
Otherwise also sought information and documents available with MHA cannot attract any ,
- <" _ ,;..,." ':,';" . - ". ".. <' C' " i ':' .'/- '?','. 1
privileged exemption even under section 24( 1) of Act bee-use providing free 'and privileged
'. access to some selected persons including al'so certain individuals without any securitFch:eckcan
.. ".' . ",' :':'"",:, ,.-, '--." ',', _,-' > .: '.: _, ,::Z.o;' '.(','. t;;,:
never be information which could prejudicially affect security or other aspects of the state or the
- ' ,. - "'.' " , . .'!.'.::... . ',. :.- :,","
concerned ones. However 0'1) providing could perhapsbe
... '. '., . :"".,:i
covereu under exemption-cover of section 8(1)(a) of RTI Act. I that learrted CPfO may
kindly be directed to information to query(3)withsollght 6ut now
_ _ '_ .',. , , ' ,,' j . . .' , ; .' , ' : _ ! 0 ., ,:
free-of-cost under section 7(6) of RTI Act. It is prayed accordingly.
Humbly submitted
v'
e;o1
. \:l
/ /\ C} ; e'1 ' " "

SUBHASH CHANDRA AGRAWAL
(Guinness Holder & RTJAclivi;/)'
1775 Kucha Lattushah
Chowk
bELHlll 0006'(India)
Mobile 9810033711 Fax 23254036'
E-mail subhashmadh4@sify.com
Web www.subhashmadhll.com

Speed Post
: RTIMATTER
No. 23014/24/2012-VS "
Government of India !
Ministry of Home
(PP Division) ,
i NDCC-ll Building, 3
rd
Floor,
...
,"'.0:;;--:---'="""

I Dated: 1]th September, 2012
To, / !
fihri Subhash Chandra Agrawal,
1775, Kucha Lattushah,
Dariba, Chandni Chowk,
Delhi-I 10006
Subject:- Your application under the RTI Act, 2005.
***
Sir,
Please refer to your application dated 30.07.2012 'under the RTI Act, 20,05 which
was received in this unit on transfer on 04.09.2012 for ,providing informationl on point
Nci>.(3). ; i
. I
i i
... .. .individuals' from-pre:.emoarkaJioo .. .-..
security checks, MHA may examine the matter in consultation with the Central Security
Agencies for recommending the inclusion of the names ofsome individuals on security
grounds to the Ministry of Civil Aviation. However, the details in this regard are exempted
under Section 24(1) ofthe RTI Act-2005 and, therefore, copies of the related documents
cannot be provided to you. i' '
3. An appeal if any, against this' reply may be madejwithin 30 days to Lokesh
If 4 " 1
Dutt Jha, Joint Secretary (PP) & Appellate Authority, Ministry of Home Affairs, prd Floor,
NDCC-II Building, Jai Singh Road, New Delhi-II 0003.
Yours faithfully,
I
karl
Director (YS): & CPIO
-
.... __ __ _ ..__. ,_, ._.. , __.,'_
i I
Copy to: Shri lB.Sharma, Under Secretary, RTI Cell, MHA, North Bldck, New
. , I
Delhi w.r.t, O.M. No.A-43020/0l/2012-RTI dated 31.08.20;12. .' I
.rr-,
"MpSTURGENT
\......-)
MATTER"
I
I No. CAS-7(36)/ 2010/Div-I (RTI-Appeal)
l
,
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA I
I
i BUREAU OF CIVIL AVIATION SECURITY
_, , (MINISTRY OF CIVIL AVIATION)
I " -,
f JANPATH, NEW DELHI-ll000l
Dated: 2..7/09/2012 .
.
Shri Subhash Chandra Agrawal,
1775 Kucha Lattushah,
Dariba, Chandni Chowk,
Delhi-06.
I
Subject: - Information under the Right to Information 2005.
v
Sir,
I '.'
I Please refer to your First Appeal dated 03/09/201l2 received on 06/q9/2012 on .
I .. , '., '. , .' . , .
1-" . .the.subject.cited.ahove,__ '" __ , _
I . . ,-.'
,
I
2. I have gone through the appeal and found that ithe information pertaining to
BCAS was provided by CPIO appropriately. The AVSEC Order no. 06/2009 dated
03/11/2009 and the related documents/ correspondence/: file noting etc., contain
I !
restricted Civil Aviation Security-information which is not open to public on security
grounds. It is exempted under section 8 (1) (a) of RTI Act, 2005. i
'I ;
3. TheCPIO has already marked copy of.his reply (fated 28/08/2012 to the other
CPIOs i.e. DGCA & MHA for giving reply to you directly. Please inform whether you
have received any reply from the above mentioned authorities so that further necessary
. action, if any, could be taken by the undersigned. i
v
.Yourta;faithfUlly, .
i
__. __,,,,;;:,,----,-,,, '_ ", __ __
,--'. .-.-....- ..-._"".' '.-.. -.--._..='\
Addl. (Commissioner of Security(CA),
, I'
& Appellate Authority
Copy to:-
j
i !..
1. The CPIO DGCA, Technical Area, Opps. Safdarjung Airport, New Delhi. : with request to
reply to the applicant directly. .!
I
i I
2. Shri Amarendra Singh, U/Secretary, CPIO, Ministry of Horne Affairs, North Bl6ck, New
Delhi. : with request to reply to the applicant directly.
!

;



\\;
Appellate Authofity'un'der RTl Act
Bureau of Civil Aviation Security
(Union Ministry of Civil Aviation)
'A' Wing, Janpath Bhawan
Janpath, New Delhi- I 1000 I
Sir
i
I vide my RTlpetition dated' 30.07.2012 sought complete and detailed information together with.
. ',:'- : - - [
I i
relateo
1dociirnents/cotrespondepce/file-notingsetc
on each of'.under-mentioned. .
relating tofiews-report 'Airbus towed' away .forYadra tofly' I7.1 .and a. copy of
. . I'" ,', " '. .,'
display-board providing.exemption from pre-embarkation ' !
I. Isit true that some order AVSEq order NO,;06/20Q9 was also
I . ';
privateindividuals His Holiness the Dalai Lama andSl.. i,Rover; Vadhera (w}th hiS wife)
.,',,' ;" - ,',.'.' '- I
from pre-embarkation security-checks, apart from listed,Dth'er authoritiesot post? .)
2. Copy ofthe said-AVSECorder No. 0612009 as referredinqueryt l ) above together with
; , '. I"" '/ _.'i; '"
complete anddetailed information together with related documents/correspondence/file
.notings etc on drafting the said
, " -: 1;
3. Copy of etc on irclusionof private indiividuals
:. His Holiness the Dalai Lama andShri Revert Vadhera his wife) in the list bfthose
'; ,.- O' , ,o' - " ,_ ," -j - ) _]_ 0
exempted frompre-embarkation :
- I
4. Is the said AVSEC order No. 06/2009 still in force as at pJ;esent?, .
5. Are some more individual. persons added to the list lof those exempted frpm pre
. . I! -t
embarkation security-checks after issue of the said AYSEC order No. 06/2009? !
. - ., '/-" '; .. ,- :,. . -!', -., ,,;' ; .- - ;,; I:
6. If yes, please name the individual persons added to the Iist.ofthose exernpted from pre
, "1 ',' '. . . I,' .,'.'
embarkation security-checks after issue of the said AYSC order No. 06/2009 .
also copies of all orders in this regard issued after the AVSEC order ,No.06f2009QU
. . I . , [',
.the aspect of exempting pre-embarkation security-checks! , I
7. Is it true that' an Airbus! had, to be towed away norms a test
1.'--, ,' . .'i',.' - '; -. ":"1- ':; ,)
fliglJt by Shri Rovert Vadhera-as referred in enclosed :
8. If yes, please provide complete and detailed information together withtelated file
, _' . . r r t
notings/documents/correspondence etc on such out-of-norms tqwing. aJ,ity of Jxirbus;to
., ' r ' I
facilitate an individual (Shri Revert Yadhera)
9. Is it true that the then Union Civil Aviation Minister ShriPrafulIa Patel.was present at
" .. I" , ;
; i ,',- ..; i
time of such out-of-norms towing away ofAirbus to facilitate an individua1(Sl1ri Rovert
I ' . ' ..... ;' .. ',
Yadhera)? . ) f
!


'. V., __'-'.I.I.PI.VI..V U ..... y. -'",",I.4I-I..I",",U 1.1.1..1.:'-'.1 YY_!IU.l .-i...... ..:t.........11.11_
':..)
notings etc on role, if any, of the, then Union Civil Aviation Minister Shri Prafulla Patel
, ,
I ,
on such out-of-norms towing away of Airbus to facurtate an ,iI)dividual:(Shri ;R,.overt .
j.
Vadhera)
11. Any other relatedinfonnation
12. File-notings on movement of this RTi petitionas well
I
f
'Learned CPIO vide response No. 28.08.2012 in responseto
; , I
query (2) declined to provide copy' of the sought AVSEC order land other related and Isought
) .,' ',: - ." :".. ,' . ' - ", - .' ",.1, __ , :, !
documents classi fied as restricted documents relating to "Civil iAviati on Sec!1rity"
:",,,'-:,, '''''_,'; -__ - ," ,_c' _ , _' ,',,,,,., _ i:,;" _ '. ': ,I .,.,-".<."
under section 8(l)(a) of RTI Act. But the' sought document is certainly not-any such
, because providing free and 'privileged accessto some selected J?ersons includingalso.jcertain.
, ,I
individuals without any security-check cali never be information Which
, ' I I ' I' "
security or otheraspects providing security to some
l ,; "'" ' ,,' , ' ",' " , '" i l " ' ,,' " I
, individuals could perhaps 'be 'covered under exemption-cover of jsection8(1)(a) of RIll Act. 1,
,,'. .""c-- " ' .,', .'-;:.' _ ';- ,.'. - ..' , _! _ ; _ .:
appeal that learned CPIO may kindly be directed.toprovide information to query
and relateddocunients but how free-of-cost tinder section 7(6) AcL :
. ", ," "j ,
Learned CHO should Rn: petition under seC'ti6n 6(3) of RTl Actto' Union
. . ... :'. .] -'
,",' , " , ""'" i" '," "', ,', ' , , ' ," I
Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) for query (3) and to DGCA ito (11)
within five days of receipt ofRTI petition. I appeal that learned! GPIO may be diJeCted to do so
'. , -.' ..' -- ' .,! ." , ..', ! - !
now but with directions to be careful forfuture to invoke section ofRTI:Act\\jithin fire days
- . I
ofreceipt of RTI petitions as clearly provided in RTl'Act.
" '.' , _-- " .. - ,,-' _. ... ' :' _! __ ' . .. , . . ; " ' 1
Learned CPIO also did not provide particulars rnandatory under
I
section 7(8)of RTI Act. It Is prayedaccordingly. '. ; I
I
C

, . " " ' f!l' ,i; '-,1-:
,j..J ,
t..


r:E
1--.;::; ,'" .... '. r -'''./ . -'. ic (' >
it;';'
! 0 . ': '_"."-""__.;:._,._'---_", ,.,' .,,' ,
, , ,
, .:,'
SUBEf\.SRCHANDRA AGRAWAL , , AUTRu, . ! I
l,tI>, , ". "', ' . ",-t
, ,jAl(?AHi Ni}ELHt, ,PHH1 " I' . 1
(GuinnessRecord Holder & RTf Activist)
,
1775 Kucha'Lattushah
Fro " Wt:i9ral1lS, .: ',. I i
I
c: "-' it, 41:/"'" ""-,,!,, I ' it ,t"' !' , ' .!
,.Q IC'" AlIin.l,.lJt> ,\ ..1;' i" ... ;' .. , , .:,,':;! 1
Dariba, Chandni Chowk
'Taxes:'!'.'S. i. 32<{Trad: oj
DELHl 110006 (India)
-.: > .. l' , .. <-.. ,:
Mobile 9810033711 Fax" 23254036
"subhashmadhu@si:fy:com
Web ly_\Yw.subhashmadhu.com
03.09.2012

No. CAS-7(35)/2010/Div-I
. GOVERNMENT OF INDIA I
.BUREAU OF CIVIL AVIAnON SECURITY
(MINISTRY OF CIVIL AVIAndN)
A' WING, JANPATH BHAWAN,
'JANPATH, NEW DELHI -110001
, I
Dated: 28/08/2012 I
'.,' .....,. ""9">'--" ",...... ..,,'_., __ - -,--",.- ---" .
"29rl SubhashChandra Agrawal,
1775 Kucha Lattushah,
Dariba. Chandni Chowk,
Delhi-06.
I
I
I
Subject: - Information under the Right to Information Act, 2005:
Sir,

, ,
v..>
i, " :
Kindly refer to your application dated 30/07/2012, under the Right to Information Act,
005"
'received on 21/08/2012, on the subject cited above. i I I
I
J
2. The required informationis as under: -
I
!
!
I
Para no. "- 01: - Yes
. ' I
, Para no. - 02: - The AVSEC Order and its related documents are classified as a restricted document

I; Therefore the related documents relatedto AVSEC Order cannot be provided. i
Para no. - 03: - Pertains to CPIO Ministry of Home Affairs.
Para no.- 04: - The said AVSEC Order is still in force.
, -...
Para no. - 05 & 06: - No.
I "
\-./'
I
, . ,I '
Para no. - 7,8,9,10 & 11: - More closely related to, CPIO DGq::A, Technical !Area, ;opps. Safdarj
Airport, New Delhi., which is a separate Public Authority. I ' :' !' .
i
(M.T.Bri
Asstt. Commissioner of Security (CA) &C 101
I' , .', j
i Copyto: . ' ! i j
::,=,-=",_ "1
! replyto the applicant directly. l' I
2. Shri Amarendra Singh, U/Secretary, GPIO, Ministry of Hdme Affairs, North Blobk, New
Delhi. : with request to reply to the applicant directI!y. , ..
Central Public Information Officer .
Airports Authority of India (AAI)
Rajiv Gandhi Bhawan
Safdarjang Airport, New Delhi-1l0003
..
i I
I will be obliged if you provide complete and detailed inforlnation togetherwithjrelated
I . :
doculllents/correspondence/file-notings etc on each of uU:der-mentioned: aspects also
. i I,
relating to news-report 'Airbus towed away for. Vadra to fly' (TNN 17.10.2008D and a
i .' . ..! '!
copy of disnlav-board providing exemption securitY-yhecksl
!
1. Is it true that some order AVSEC order No. 06/200? was ever issued exempting
.sz
iV'
I . :. i
also private individuals His Holiness the Dalai Lama and Shri Rovert yadhera
. . ! Ii'
(with his wife) from pre-embarkation security-checks apart' from listdd other
authorities on post?
I' i
2. Copy of the said AVSEC order No. 06/2009 as !referred in query (1D above
together with complete and detailed information together with i. related
"
documents/correspondence/file-notings etc on drafting the said AVSEC otder No.
i 'I
0612009 I
I . i
3.- Copy of file-notings/correspondence/documents etc on inclusion of private
. .. ! -, .. . i
individuals His Holiness the Dalai Lama and ShriRovert Vadhera !(with I?is wife)
in the list of those exempted from pre-embarkation i \., ..
.....-....",.
4. Is the said AVSEC order No. 06/2009 still in force at present? , i
I .. . i
V'
5. Are some more individual persons added to the of those exenipted pre-
I '.1
embarkation security-checks after issue of the said AVSEC order 1\To. 06/:2009?'
- I j.'
6. If yes, please name the individual persons added the list of exempted
, .' i I!,
from pre-embarkation security-checks after issue qfthe said AV'SEC o;rder No.
" . . , 1 "_
0612009 enclosing alsocopies of all orders in this regard issued afterl the said
. i j i,
AVSEC order No. 06/2009 on the aspect of exempting pre-embarkation Isecurity
:'
,: ! i
checks i .
7.'Is it true that an Airbus had to be towed away byp1assingnorms for faci\Jitating a
" . ..: i j
I '
test-flight by Shri Rovert Vadhera as referred in enclosed news-retiort?
L I
..
.tI
I
I
c:) I
,
::
"'u
.

;-.
I
I
.......... ,],""U, 1-'1..""'..........,"'" ... \0.1."'" ""''-'J..'J..J..1!.L''-''':''''' LA..I..I."-'l """"" .... \..1.......,,""''-1. ......... ..LV.L.1..l...l.IO.t.II. ... v-t.l ..'-'b............ ............ "'"': ... _;--
notings/documents/correspondence etc on such out-df-nonns towing of
,I 'f
, '
Airbus to facilitate an individual (Shri Rovert Vadhera): i ' i'
I I, I
9. Is it true that the then Union Civil Aviation Minister Shri WaS
. ' - (- \ 1
I '
present at time of such out-of-norms towing away 'pf Airbus to an
individual (Shri Rovert Vadhera)? i' II
, ,', !
10. Complete and detailed information together with related
I . , i
correspondence/documents/filenotings etc on role, if any, of the then Unionlti'ivil
Aviation Minister Shri Prafulla Patel 'QU such 'out-Jf-nonns towing awly of
I 'I
facilitate an individual (ShriRovertVadhera)! ' i,
" ,',' ", i.
11. Any other related infortnation : I
12. File-notings oil movement of this RTI petition as well i
l

i
IJl case, queries relate to some other public-authority ,please transfer this RT,I petitlon to 10
i' ! i
CPIO there under section 6(3) of RTI Act. Postal-order number 03F 472429 for rupees
.', , " I, i i
ten is enclosed towards RTI fees in name of "Accounts Officer" as per No.
I "., , \ '
F.1O/9/2008-IRdated05.12.2008. :7 ...,
:: . ,fJ) -I . : : ': :':."'1
-. I I I '- -
',' O _', ,', lb:B::m'I'.-1 ,".1 :'J '.
"0 ...: ,A.' loY : : -: ,'"
a:: IT I:'Ql . o , 0 0 , , ' .. N .
UIIL _cu, "'0', _ -0:: I I. !.. I - - _ ' ...
'14."0 '1:,,' _,_ Regards !; !;' _Q) 0. '0" en :: '.:: ,I :I. .r-; . f

j" _."
_
'.:..1,1'
. :
-, "".
0
:;)
o !
.c:
o
'lIl,"
Cll ._ )d" "c,,,,
':0',,' ,:. I:.
III j
, '.,:
>()vl,.UI , "0 . t: 0 'u2 en If.t: lirE ; - > 0 .."
. , I. Ql'.c . 0 ..... ' .... .. ,g. u;
. .Q ../1;. 1iS.t:.,': !S.. -IZ:'S $'" M
, 0 I l: 0 III ' ."
'itt- I '1!2 o : F-.. 1E; C>
."'.
'.
. ' 10<> di! 0 di! i'b'... Q
I I "
. \
SUBHASH CHANDRA AGRAWAL :
(Guinness Record Holder & RTf Activist)
[1":
It
G
1775 Kucha Lattushah
Dariba, Chandni Chowk
DELHI 110006 (India)
Mobile9810033711 Fax 23254036
E-mail subhashmadhu@sify.com
Web www.subhashmadhu.com


r
30.07.1012
I
j
SP DARE
I
...
EiiUIt;r . I
To:C Pi. OFFiO,S i AiRPOR[ NnE
i
l
NO I PiN: ! I
From:5 C .AGRAwAL DElGHUI
I '
. ,
,
! . i I
on
<: , ,
- __.., - I -__ - - -,
Airbus towed away tor Vadra totly
. . . . . I'
2008
I
. , I Ii r .
I, i . !
t
HYDERABAD: Robert Vadra, son-in-law of Sonia Gandhi, gave some tense moments
> > I j 1
to the organisers of the air show on Thursday; Vadra, who has been since
. . I I'
Wednesday along with Captain.Satish Sharma, wanted to go on a test flight of Falcon
, . r: 1."
gooEX, the business.class aircraft that has been great hit at the show. [By the time
l' ; j
special permission for a test flight was obtained, it was already time for the Aitbus A .
I I
380, the star of.the show, to land. i' i
I
. .
i
I
After intense discussions, the' organisers of the show allowed the Airbus t6 land
I I
which it did by flying low; i
I
I
I
. [.
The Airbus, which is the size of half-a-football ground, occupied the runway and the
i j!
i--'-"
>
U" parking bay, making it difficult for-the Falcon totake off. thereafter] keepirg the
media at bay, the AirbusAgdo was towed close. to thespeoiallyereeted C:halets!at the
show with the help of a tractor. The Airbus officials did not like this one!bit; 'butcivil
aviation minister Praful Patel, was hanging around to take bare. '!
. I i
Ii,
Then Vadra, following in the footsteps of his father-in-law, the late Rajiv Gandhi, .
I I f
I
. went out for atest flight. i' :
;;
<J
i
!

t