Sunteți pe pagina 1din 3

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION - DETROIT IN RE: Collins & Aikman Corporation,

et al., Case No. 05-55927-SWR Jointly Administered Honorable Steven W. Rhodes Chapter 11

Debtors. _________________________/

NOTICE OF ENTRY OF ORDER PLEASE TAKE NOTICE That an Order (A) Denying Renewed Motion For Order Compelling Debtors To Assume Or Reject Lease On Equipment On Behalf Of Toyota Motor Credit Corporation; (B) Requiring Accounting Of Excess Hours And (C) Awarding Administrative Expense And Requiring Payment Thereon has been submitted to the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Michigan. PURSUANT TO L.B.R. 9021-1(a) YOU ARE HEREBY REQUIRED TO FILE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE ABOVE WITH THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN WITHIN SEVEN (7) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF SERVICE. YOU ARE FURTHER REQUIRED TO SERVE COUNSEL FOR Toyota Motor Credit Corporation WITH A COPY OF THE WRITTEN RESPONSE WITHIN THE AFORESTATED PERIOD. YOUR FAILURE TO TIMELY FILE AND SERVE A WRITTEN OBJECTION WILL RESULT IN THE COURT GRANTING THE ORDER ENCLOSED. Respectfully submitted; KILPATRICK & ASSOCIATES, P.C.

_/s/ Leonora K. Baughman_____________________ RICHARDO I. KILPATRICK (P35275) LEONORA K. BAUGHMAN (P33534) Attorneys for Creditor, Toyota Motor Credit Corporation 903 North Opdyke, Suite C Auburn Hills, Michigan 48326 (248) 377-0700 Dated: March 29, 2006

0W[;&#=

0555927060329000000000007

'$

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION - DETROIT

IN RE: Collins & Aikman Corporation, et al., Case No. 05-55927-SWR Jointly Administered Honorable Steven W. Rhodes Chapter 11

Debtors. _________________________/ ORDER (A) DENYING RENEWED MOTION FOR ORDER COMPELLING DEBTORS TO ASSUME OR REJECT LEASE ON EQUIPMENT ON BEHALF OF TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION; (B) REQUIRING ACCOUNTING OF EXCESS HOURS AND (C) AWARDING ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSE AND REQUIRING PAYMENT THEREON This matter having come before the Court on the Renewed Motion For Order Compelling Debtors To Assume or Reject Lease on Equipment on Behalf of Toyota Motor Credit Corporation [Docket No. 2048] (the Motion) filed by and through Counsel Kilpatrick & Associates, P.C.; the Debtors having filed an objection by and through Counsel Kirkland & Ellis LLP; the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors through counsel having filed a joinder to the Debtors objection to the Motion; the Court having scheduled a hearing on the Motion for March 9, 2006 at 2:00 p.m.; the hearing having been held at the scheduled time; the Court having concluded that cause did not exist to accelerate the date established by the Court in its November 22, 2005 Order [Docket No. 1801] requiring the Debtors to assume or reject the equipment leases (the Leases) with Toyota Motor Credit Corporation (TMCC) on or before May 10, 2006; the Court having found that TMCC is entitled to the award of an Administrative Expense Claim for the hours that the fork lifts, which are the subject of the Leases were utilized after the petition date in excess of the hours set forth under the Leases (Post-petition

Over Usage); the Court having further required the Debtors to provide all information necessary to determine the Post-petition Over Usage on the fork lifts to TMCC on or before April 10, 2006, and monthly thereafter; the Court having further required that the Debtors pay TMCC for the Post-petition Over Usage when invoiced unless disputed by the Debtors; for the reasons stated on the record and the Court being otherwise fully advised in the premises; NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is denied; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Debtors shall, on or before April 10, 2006, provide to TMCC all information necessary to determine the hours in excess of those contemplated under the Leases for the post-petition usage of the fork lifts (Postpetition Over Usage) subject to the Leases held by TMCC; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that TMCC shall be entitled to an Administrative Expense Claim for the Post-petition Over Usage; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Debtors shall pay Toyota Motor Credit Corporation for the Post-petition Over Usage upon submission of an invoice unless the Debtors dispute the amounts billed therein.

S-ar putea să vă placă și