Scribd Logo
Încărcați

Bine ați venit la Scribd!

  • People - V - Posner - V - NYPD, 86 A.D.3d 443 - Appellate Division, First Department, New York State

    Încărcat de

    Jonathan S. Gould, Esq.
    58 vizualizări2 pagini
    People v Posner, 86 A.D.3d 443 (2011) 926 N.Y.S.2d 287, 2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 05879 86 A.D.3d 443, 926 N.Y.S.2d 287 (Mem), 2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 05879 The People of the State of New York, Plaintiff v Louis Posner et al., Respondents. New York City Police Department, Nonparty Appellant. Michael Kessler, Third-Party Respondent; Joseph A. Bondy et al., Third-Party Intervenors-Respondents. Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York July 7, 2011 People v Posner Order affirming Decision of State Supreme Court awarding attorney's fees and expenses from seized assets.  

    Titlu original

    People_v_Posner_v_NYPD, 86 A.D.3d 443 --Appellate Division, First Department, New York State

    Drepturi de autor

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Formate disponibile

    PDF, TXT sau citiți online pe Scribd

    Vi se pare util acest document?

    Este necorespunzător acest conținut?

    Raportați acest document
    People v Posner, 86 A.D.3d 443 (2011) 926 N.Y.S.2d 287, 2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 05879 86 A.D.3d 443, 926 N.Y.S.2d 287 (Mem), 2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 05879 The People of the State of New York, Plaintiff v Louis Posner et al., Respondents. New York City Police Department, Nonparty Appellant. Michael Kessler, Third-Party Respondent; Joseph A. Bondy et al., Third-Party Intervenors-Respondents. Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York July 7, 2011 People v Posner Order affirming Decision of State Supreme Court awarding attorney's fees and expenses from seized assets.  

    Drepturi de autor:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Descărcați ca PDF, TXT sau citiți online pe Scribd
    Indicator pentru conținut neadecvat
    58 vizualizări2 pagini

    People - V - Posner - V - NYPD, 86 A.D.3d 443 - Appellate Division, First Department, New York State

    Încărcat de

    Jonathan S. Gould, Esq.
    People v Posner, 86 A.D.3d 443 (2011) 926 N.Y.S.2d 287, 2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 05879 86 A.D.3d 443, 926 N.Y.S.2d 287 (Mem), 2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 05879 The People of the State of New York, Plaintiff v Louis Posner et al., Respondents. New York City Police Department, Nonparty Appellant. Michael Kessler, Third-Party Respondent; Joseph A. Bondy et al., Third-Party Intervenors-Respondents. Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York July 7, 2011 People v Posner Order affirming Decision of State Supreme Court awarding attorney's fees and expenses from seized assets.  

    Drepturi de autor:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Descărcați ca PDF, TXT sau citiți online pe Scribd
    Indicator pentru conținut neadecvat
    din 2

    People v Posner, 86 A.D.3d 443 (2011) 926 N.Y.S.2d 287, 2011 N.Y. Slip Op.

    05879

    86 A.D.3d 443, 926 N.Y.S.2d 287 (Mem), 2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 05879 The People of the State of New York, Plaintiff v Louis Posner et al., Respondents. New York City Police Department, Nonparty Appellant. Michael Kessler, Third-Party Respondent; Joseph A. Bondy et al., Third-Party Intervenors-Respondents. Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York July 7, 2011 People v Posner

    Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Michael J. Obus, J.), entered on or about April 13, 2010, which, in an action concerning custody of seized funds, denied the motion of nonparty New York City Police Department (NYPD) to vacate prior orders, same court and Justice, entered on or about February 18, 2010, directing the release of money from the seized funds to pay defendants attorneys fees, private investigator *444 fees, accountants fees, and living expenses, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Appeals from orders, same court and Justice, entered on or about April 13, 2010, which directed the NYPD to release funds to pay said fees accruing up to March 2010, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as subsumed in the appeal from the order denying the NYPDs motion to vacate. The court had jurisdiction to decide the issue regarding the release of the seized funds (see CPL 690.55 [1] [a]; Matter of Documents Seized Pursuant to Search Warrant, 124 Misc 2d 897, 899 [1984]). The record belies NYPDs argument that it was not afforded a full and fair **2 opportunity to be heard before the court directed the release of the subject funds. Furthermore, under the circumstances presented, the court properly exercised its equitable powers to order the release of the funds to pay attorneys and experts fees (id.). We have considered NYPDs remaining arguments and find them unavailing. ConcurMazzarelli, J.P., Catterson, DeGrasse and Abdul-Salaam, JJ. Copr. (C) 2012, Secretary of State, State of New York
    1

    HEADNOTE

    Courts Jurisdiction Search WarrantsDisposition of Seized Property Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York (Dona B. Morris of counsel), for appellant. Jonathan S. Gould, New York, for Posner respondents. Roger J. Bernstein, New York, for Michael Kessler, respondent. Joseph A. Bondy, New York, respondent pro se and for Robert Fogelnest and Margaret Clemons, respondents.

    2012 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.

    People v Posner, 86 A.D.3d 443 (2011) 926 N.Y.S.2d 287, 2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 05879
    End of Document 2012 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.

    2012 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.

    S-ar putea să vă placă și