Sunteți pe pagina 1din 14

187 (2) 272 (2-6) 341 (6-11) 372 (11-19) 372-381; 386-395.

543 (19-21) 567-581 (21-36) 605 (36-38) Chapter One Jurisprudential Origins of S.S. in Law (1) I. Early Developments (2) The Common Law (1881) (2) Brief for the Defendant in Error Muller v. Oregon (5) Muller v. Oregon (8) The Scope and Purpose of Sociological Jurisprudence (11) Sociological Juris to Realism: Juris and Social Change Early 20th Cen. (14) II. The Realist Movement (16) Some Realism About RealismResponding to Dean Pound (17) Mr. Justice Holmes and Non-Euclidean Legal Thinking (20) The Crisis of Democratic Theory (1973) (24) Confirmation Hearing on John G. Robers Jr. (27) Confirmation Hearing on the Nomination of Sonia Sotomayor (30) Chapter Two A Primer of Legal and Social Science Methods (35) I. Legal Methods (35)

Frye v. US (36) FRE (37) Duabert v. Merrell Dow (37) Duabert v. Merrel Dow (42) G.E. Co. v. Joiner (47) Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael (50) FRE (52) II. Social Science Methods (57) A. Methods of Asking Questions (57) 1. The Empirical Approach (57) Approaches to Social Research 4th Ed. 2005 (58) 2. Causal Explanation (59) Science and Behavior: Intro to Methods of Psych Research 4th Ed 1995 (60) 3. Measurements (62) (a) Variables (62) Basic Research Methods in Soc. Sci. 3rd Ed. 1985 (62) (b) Operational Definition (64) The Practice of Soc. Research 11th Ed. 2007 (64) (c) Reliability and Validity (66) Reference Guide on Stats (66) B. Methods of Gathering Information (68) 1. Threats to Validity (68) (a) Internal Validity (69)

Quasi-Experimentation: Design, Analysis Issues for Field Settings 1979 (69) (b) External Validity (72) Quasi Experimentation, Supra (73) 2. Research Design (75) (a) Case Studies (75) Basic Research Meshods in Soc. Sci 3rd Ed. 1985 (75) (b) Correlational Studies (76) Science and Behavior: Intro to Methods of Psych Research 4th Ed. 1995 (77) (c) True Experiments (85) Methods for Empirical Eval of Innovations in Justice System (85) (d) Quasi-Experiments (85) Methods for Empirical Evaluation of Innovations in the Justice System (85) C. Methods of Interpreting Information (89) 1. The Description of Results (89) (a) Measures fo Central Tendency (90) Reference Guide on Stats (90) (b) Measures on Variability (91) Reading Stats and Research 5th Ed. 2008 (91) (c) Measures of Association (95) Stat Evidence in Litigation: Methods, Procedure, and Practice 1986 (96) 2. The Inferences Drawn From Results (96) Research Methods in Soc. Relations 3rd Ed. 1976 (97) Research Methods in Soc. Relations 7th Ed. 2002 (100)

Chapter Three Social Sciende Used to Determine Facts (104) I. Trademarks (104) A. Social Science Evidence and the Hearsay Rule (106) Elgin National Watch Co. v. Elgin Clock Co. (106) Triangle Publications v. Rohrlich (108) Oneida v. National Silver (109) Zippo Manufacturing v. Rogers Imports (110) B. Social Science Evidence of Consumer Confusion (111) Zippo Manufacting Co. v. Rogers Imports (111) Amstar v. Dominos Pizza (112) Squirt v. 7up (114) Kroger v. Johnson and Johnson (116) La Victoria Foods v. Curtice-Burns (117) KIS v. Foto Fantasy (120) Pharmacia Corp. v. Alcon Labs (124) Smith v. Wal-Mart (127) Manual for Complex Litgation 4th Ed. 2004 (135) Reference Guide on Survey Research (135) McCarthy on Trademarks and Unfair Comp 4th Ed. 1996 (137) Social Facts: Sci Methods as Legal Precedent (138) Empirical Questions Without Empirical Answers (141) II. Obscenity (142) A. The Admisibility of Social Science Evidence of Obsceneity (143)

People v. Muller (143) Jacobellis v. Ohio (144) Jacobellis v. Ohio (144) Smith v. CA (145) Miller v. CA (146) Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton (147) Kaplan v. CA (147) Hamling v. US (148) B. Social Science Evidence of Community Standards (148) People v. Nelson (149) Saliba v. State (151) Comm. v. Trainor (155) US V. Pryba (158) The Law of Obscenity (1976) (160) Estimating Comm. Standards: Use of SS Evidence in Obscenity Prosecution (161) St. John v. State of NC Parole Commsh (165) III. Damages (167) Harolds Stores v. Dillard Dept Stores (168) Cimino v. Raymark (172) In Re Estate of Ferdinand Marcos HR Litigation (176) Hilao v. Estate of Marcos (180) Cimino v. Raymark (183) Sampling Damages (184)

Dukes v. Wal-Mart, Inc (186) Chapter Four Social Science Used to Make Law (188) I. Legislative Facts (188) An Approah to Probs of Evidence in Administrative Process (189) Facts in Lawmaking (190) Judicial, Legislative, and Admin Lawmaking: Proposed Research Service for S.Ct. (191) II. Constitutional Law (192) A. The Fourteenth Amendment: School Segregation (193) 1. The Fourteenth Am: School Segregation (193) 1. Segregation by Race (193) (a) Separate but Equal (193) Plessy v. Ferguson (193) The Psychological Effects of Enforced Segregation: Survey of SS Opinion (195) Racial ID and Preference in Negro Children (197) Simple Justice (Ed. 2004) (199) The Effects of Segregation and Consequences of Deseg: SS Statement (201) Brown v. Board (201) Brown v. Board (204) Jurisprudence (205) Stell v. Savannah (206) Stell v. Savannah (209) Forced Justice: School Deseg and Law (210) SS and School Deseg: Did We Mislead the S. Ct? (211)

School Deseg: The Social Science Role (212) (b) White Flight (212) Morgan v. Kerrigan (213) Morgan v. Kerrigan (214) Parents Involved v. Seattle (219) 2. Segregation by Gender (226) Mississippi University for Women (MUW) v. Hogan (226) Association and Assimilation (229) US v. Comm (232) US v. Comm (236) US v. VA (241) Office of the Assistant Sec. for Civil Rights US Dept. of Ed 2007 (245) B. The First Amendment: Obscene or Violent Entertainment (248) 1. Obscenity (248) US v. Roth (248) Report on the Commish on Obscenity and Porn 1970 (253) Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton (255) Facts in Lawmaking (257) NY v. Ferber (258) Report of the Attorney Generals Commsh on Obscenity and Porn 86 (261) The Attorney Generals Commsh on Porn: The Gaps Between Findings and Fact (264) 2. Violent Video Games (267) American Amusement Machine Ass v. Kendrick (267)

Entertainment Software Assn v. Blagojevich (269) C. The Sixth Amendment: Juries and Witnesses (272) 1. Jury Size (272) Williams v. FL (273) Colgrove v. Battin (275) Ignorance of Science Is No Excuse (277) Ballew v. GA (281) People v. Dist. Ct (289) Opinion of the Justices (292) Gonzalez v. FL (294) 2. Death-Qualified Juries (296) Witherspoon v. IL (296) Grigsby v. Mabry (298) Lockhart v. McCree (305) Overruled: Jury Neutrality in Capital Cases (313) D. The Eighth Amendment: The Death Penalty (315) 1. Deterrence (316) Furman v. GA (316) Gregg v. GA (318) Deterrence and Incapac: Est Effects of Criminal Sanctions on Crime Rates (321) 2. Discrimination (323) McCleskey v. Kemp (324) Law and Stats in Conflict: Reflections on McCleskey (331)

Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. 1994 (334) Baze v. Rees (336) 3. Excessive Sanction (341) Roper v. Simmons (342) Kennedy v. LA (346) III. Common Law (355) A. Rules of Evidence and Trial Management (355) 1. The Exclusionary Rule (355) Wolf v. CO (356) Mapp v. OH (358) US v. Leon (360) State v. Novembrino (368) 2. Impeachment of a Witness (372) People v. Allen (372) 3. Permitting Jurors to Ask Questions of a Witness (378) Securities and Exchange Commn v. Koenig (379) B. Tort Liability (380) Zinck v. Whelan (381) Hill v. Yaskin (383) McClenahan v. Cooley (384) IV. Social Authority (387) Social Authority: Obtaining Evaluating and Establishing Social Science in Law (387) Empirical Questions Without Empirical Answers (392)

Chapter Five Social Science Used to Provide Context (396) I. Social Science as Context (396) Social Frameworks: A New Use of Social Science in Law (397) II. Contexts for Determining Future Facts (398) A. Bail (398) Report of the Committee on the Judiciary US Senate 1983 (398) Bail Reform Act of 1984 (400) US v. Salerno (401) B. Parole (404) Notes (408) C. Civil Commitment of Sexually Violent Predators (410) KS v. Hendricks (411) Sexually Violent Predators Act (414) D. Capital Punishment (417) Barefoot v. Estelle (418) State v. Davis (422) Saldano v. TX (426) Saldano v. TX (428) E. Tort Liability (428) Tarasoff v. Regents of the UC (428) Thompson v. Cnty of Alameda (433) Brady v. Hopper (435) Civil Code of CA 1985 (440)

III. Contexts for Determining Present Facts (442) A. Illegal Weapons (443) US v. Lopez (443) Final Report to President Clinton (448) The 9-11 Commsh Report (449) B. Illegal Aliens (451) US v. Martinez-Fuerte (451) C. Illegal Drugs (454) US v. Sokolow (455) NJ v. Soto (461) US v. NJ (464) Independent Monitors 16th Report, submitted to US D. Ct for NJ and US DOJ 2007 (466) IV. Context for Determining Past Facts (467) A. Defendants (467) 1. Culture (468) People v. Poddar (468) People v. Aphaylath (470) Dang Vang v. Vang Xiong X. Toyed (471) People v. Wu (472) State v. Kargar (474) 2. Subculture (478) US v. Alexander and Murdock (478) The Twilight of Welfare Criminology (482)

The Morality of the Criminal Law: A Rejoinder of Professor Morse (482) Malign neglect-Race, Crime, and Punishment in America 1995 (483) 3. Personality (485) NJ v. Cavallo (485) State v. Hickman (485) B. Victims (551) People v. Taylor (551) State v. Kinney (557) Rape Trauma Syndrome (561) Chng Allure of Incrd Conv: Admty of Ex. Tsty on Rpe Trma Synd in Crim Prc. (562) Henson v. State (563) Rape Trauma Syndrome (566) C. Witnesses (567) AZ v. Chapple (567) Weatherred v. State (573) State v. Via (577) Newsome v. McCabe (578) Eyewitness ID Procedures: Recmmdtns for Lineups and Photospreads (580) Eyewitness Ev: A Guide for Law Enforcement (582) Report of the Task Force on Eyewitness Ev (584) US v. Smith (586) V. Social Frameworks (597) Social Frameworks: A New Use of SS in Law (597)

Empirical Questions Without Empirical Answers (599) Dukes v. Wal-Mart Inc (600) Contextual Ev. of Gender Disc: The Ascendance of Social Frameworks (602) Chapter Six Social Science and Litigation Strategy (606) I. Choosing Venue (606) Pretrial Publicity, Change of Venue, Public Opinion PollsA Theory of Proc. Justice (606) PA v. Cohen (608) The Psych of the Am. Jury 1987 (612) ABA Standards for Crim. Justice 1992 (613) Firestone v. Crown Center Redevelopment Corp (614) II. Choosing a Jury (619) Attny for the Def (620) Modern Trials 1982 (621) The Effect of Peremptory Challenges on Jury and Verdict: Experiment in Fed D. Ct. (622) Use of Social Science in Trials With Political and Racial Overtones: Trial of Joan Little (624) The Limits of Sci Jury Selection: Ethical and Empirical (630) SS Involvment in Voir Dire: Prelim Data on Effectiveness of Sci Jury Selection (632) III. Choosing Instructions (635) Pattern Jury Instructions: App of SS Research (635) The Law and Psych of Jury Instructions (638) Mitchell v. Gonzales (638) Deciding on Death: Revising Jury Instructions to Improve Juror Comprehension of law (641) US v. I. Lewis Libby (645)

US v. I. Lewis Libby (648) US v. I. Lewis Libby (650)

S-ar putea să vă placă și