Sunteți pe pagina 1din 15

Emerging Technologies in Room (Suite) Pressure Control,

Performance Modeling and Design Practices


Wei Sun, P.E.
ASHRAE
Principal, Director of Engineering
Engsysco, Inc.
Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA

___________________________________
Emerging Technologies in Room (Suite)
Pressure Control, Performance
Modeling and Design Practices

___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________

Presented by

Wei Sun, P.E.


ASHRAE
Clean Spaces Technical Committee (TC9.11) Chairman
Healthcare Facilities Technical Committee (TC9.6) Member
Laboratory Systems Technical Committee (TC9.10) Member
Principal, Director of Engineering
Engsysco, Inc.
Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA

___________________________________

Engsysco

___________________________________
___________________________________

www.engsysco.com

___________________________________
Introduction
Room Pressurization Technique

___________________________________

Purposes
Direct desired flow patterns
Isolate airborne cross contamination

___________________________________

Definition
A technique that air pressure differences are created
mechanically between rooms to introduce intentional air
movement paths through room leakage openings. These
openings could be either designated, such as doorways, or
undesignated, such as air gaps around doorframes or other
duct/piping penetration cracks.

___________________________________
___________________________________

How to achieve
It can be achieved by arranging the controlled volumes of
supply, return, and exhaust airstreams to each room within the
space.

___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________

Introduction

___________________________________

Basic Rules
Air connection between two adjacent
rooms is through connecting opening(s).
If a door between two rooms is open, the
doorway will be the main designated flow
path.
If the door is closed, then the leakage will
be through undesignated paths, such as
air gaps along doorframes, joints, pipe
and duct penetrations and gaps around
ceiling panels etc. Most of these
controllable cracks (except for operable
doors) in typical controlled spaces are
required to be permanently sealed.

P1 > P2
Room 1

Room 2

RA1 + EA1

RA2 + EA2

___________________________________

Leakage Flows
Door Closed

P1

SA1

SA2

P2

___________________________________

P1 > P2
Room 1

Room 2

RA1 + EA1

RA2 + EA2

Leakage Flows
Door Opened

P1

SA1

SA2

P2

___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________

___________________________________
Introduction

___________________________________

Basic Rules
To Achieve P1 > P2 ,
Room 1

SA1 > (RA1+EA1), and


SA2 < (RA2+EA2)

Room 2

RA1 + EA1

___________________________________

RA2 + EA2

SA1 = (RA1+EA1) + Q
SA2 + Q = (RA2+EA2)

Leakage Flow

Q is the leakage (transfer) air


from Room 1 to Room 2, if
both rooms are tightly sealed,
except for the opening
between rooms.

Leakage Opening

SA1

P1

___________________________________

SA2

P2

___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________

Introduction

___________________________________

Relationship between Leakage Flow, Leakage Area


and Pressure Drop across Leakage Path
The pressure drop (differential)
across an opening (either a crack
or a doorway) is strongly related
with the leakage opening size
(effective leakage area) and
leakage flow through the opening.
To quantitatively achieve a
desired room pressure (or,
pressure differential between
rooms), leakage openings and
respective leakage airflows need
to be studied together.

___________________________________

Room 1

Room 2

RA1 + EA1

A
Leakage Area

SA1

P1

___________________________________

RA2 + EA2

Q
Leakage Flow

SA2

P2

___________________________________

___________________________________

Pressure Differential

___________________________________
___________________________________
Airflow through Leakage Opening
Power Equation: (Esq.. 1)

___________________________________

Room 1

Room 2

RA1 + EA1

RA2 + EA2

Q = C (P )n

Leakage Flow

P1

SA1

SA2

P2

where
Q = volumetric flow rate
P = pressure drop across opening
C = flow coefficient
n = flow exponent

___________________________________

Leakage Area

Pressure Differential

CFM (L/s)
in. of water (Pa)
CFM/(in. of watern) (L/s/Pan)
dimensionless

___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________

Airflow through Large Designated Opening


Orifice Equation: (Esq.. 2)

Room 1

Room 2

RA1 + EA1

Q = 2610 A P

(I-P unit)

Q = 840 A P

(SI unit)

RA2 + EA2

Q
Leakage Flow

P1

SA1

SA2

P2

Pressure Differential

volumetric flow rate


pressure drop across opening
large designated opening area's)
unit conversion factor
unit conversion factor

___________________________________

Leakage Area

where
Q
=
P =
A
=
2610 =
840 =

___________________________________

CFM (L/s)
in. of water (Pa)
ft2 (m2)
dimensionless (I-P unit)
dimensionless (SI unit)

___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________

Orifice Equation is more popularly used in design community

___________________________________

___________________________________
Air Leakage Rate vs. Pressure Difference for
Various Leakage Areas (Based on Orifice Equation)
2,000

Leakage Area
(Sq. in.)

1,800
1,700

380

___________________________________

360
340

1,600

320

1,500

Leakage Flowrate (cfm)

___________________________________

400

1,900

300

1,400

280

1,300

260

1,200

240

1,100

___________________________________

220

1,000

200

900

180

800

160

700

140

600

120

500

100

400

80

300

60

200

40
20

100
0
0

___________________________________
___________________________________

0.005 0.01 0.015 0.02 0.025 0.03 0.035 0.04 0.045 0.05 0.055 0.06 0.065 0.07 0.075 0.08

Pressure Differential Between Rooms (in.)

___________________________________
___________________________________

Leakage Area Value Determination


Large designated openings such as doorway can be easily
measured. However irregular opening such as a crack can not
be measured physically, there is other means to estimate the
equivalent size, or called Effective Leakage Area (ELA).

___________________________________
___________________________________

For Existing Rooms:


Field Blower Door Test (ASTM 1987, CGSB 1986) to obtain
more precious data.
For Future Rooms during design phase:
Use ASHRAE ELA tables for building components (doors,
walls, joints, etc.) as estimated values.

___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________

ASTM Blower Door Test,


- Traditional Room Air-tightness Test
Portable Pressurization Blower Test can
produce a set of data of Q - P, and a
power equation curve fit with calculated
constants (C, n, ELA) that defines a rooms
unique and dynamic leakage characteristic.
Abnormal test ranges:
ASTM (1987):
12.5 - 75 Pa
(0.05 - 0.30 in.)
CGSB (1986):
5 - 50 Pa
(0.02 - 0.20 in.)

___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________

Labor intense, time consuming

___________________________________

Disruption to occupied spaces

___________________________________
___________________________________
Blower Door Test - Multiple-Point Test
Data for Power Equation Curve Fitting
Q = C ( P )

Power equation:

Once obtained Q - P data set, C and n can be calculated:


m

( ln Qk
ln Pk ) m (ln Qk ln Pk )
k =1
k =1
n = k =1
m

ln Pk )

k =1

(ln Pk )

k =1

m
m

ln Qk n
ln Pk

k =1
C = EXP k =1
m

___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________

___________________________________
Opening Resistance Analysis
Define:
Leakage Flow Resistance R

___________________________________

1
R=
ELA

___________________________________

Leakage flow resistances connected in parallel and series


n

ELA = ELA

Q
Pi
P

i =1

___________________________________

ELAT =

2
i =1 (ELAi )
n

Qi

___________________________________
___________________________________

___________________________________
___________________________________
Room Pressurization Scenarios and
Variable Relationship

___________________________________

Scennario 1: Room Prerssurized


SA - (EA+RA) = V = Q > 0

Room
Positively
Pressurized

Offset
Flow
V
Total Leakage
Airflows
Q

___________________________________
___________________________________

Total Room Exhaust


and/or Return Airflow
(EA+RA)

Total Room
Exhaust and/or
Return Airflow
(EA+RA)

Total Room
Supply Airflow
(SA)

Total Room
Supply Airflow
(SA)

___________________________________

___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________

Room Pressurization Scenarios and


Variable Relationship

___________________________________

Total Room
Exhaust and/or
Return Airflow
(EA+RA)

Room
Non-Pressurized

Total Leakage
Airflows
Q = 0

Total Room Exhaust and/or


Return Airflow
(EA+RA)

Total Room
Supply Airflow
(SA)

Total Room
Supply Airflow
(SA)

Scennario 2: Room Non-Prerssurized


SA - (EA+RA) = V = Q = 0

___________________________________
Offset
Flow
V = 0

___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________

Room Pressurization Scenarios and


Variable Relationship
Scennario 3: Room De-prerssurized
SA - (EA+RA) = V = Q < 0

Room
Negatively
De-pressurized

Offset
Flow
V

Total Leakage
Airflows
Q

___________________________________
Total Room Exhaust and/or Return
Airflow
(EA+RA)

Total Room
Exhaust and/or
Return Airflow
(EA+RA)

Total Room
Supply Airflow
(SA)

Total Room
Supply Airflow
(SA)

___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________

Central Air Handling System &


Room Pressurization
SA =

Volume of total
supply air entering
the space/zone
RA = Volume of total
return air leaving the
space/zone
EA = Volume of total
exhaust air leaving
the space/zone
OA = Volume of outside air
drawn into the AHU
FA = Volume of relief air
released from return
air
RA-FA = Volume of
recalculated air
Q=
Volume of total
leakage air through
space shell/zone

___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________

Central Air Handling Unit &


Room Pressurization

___________________________________

Two volumetric
balance equations

___________________________________

(Mass balance equation under


assumption of same air density)

SA = RA + EA + Q
(Volume balance for a space)

SA = OA + (RA FA)

___________________________________
___________________________________

(Volume balance for a typical AHU)

___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
Space Pressurization Ratio (R)
Define as the Ratio between SA and (RA+EA), as an
indicator of pressurization scale:

SA
SA
R=
=
RA + EA SA Q

___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________

By specifying SA values, R will be a function of Q. R


Value Chart is convenient for design engineers to
determine SA and (RA+EA) ratio during air distribution
arrangement.

___________________________________

Chart

___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________

Pressurization Ratio vs. Air Leakage Rate


for Various Supply Air Rates

___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________

___________________________________
Space versus Room Pressurization Ratios
The relationship between the space pressurization ratio
and its individual room pressurization ratios:

R=

1
(SAi SA)

i =1

___________________________________
___________________________________

Ri

___________________________________

The space pressurization ratio, an indicator of relative


pressurization level, can be used to adjust air gains or
losses among zones in order to arrange desired air
flows within a building.

___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________

Adjacent Rooms under Various Pressures

___________________________________

If a room has several leakage openings with adjacent


rooms, the rooms pressurization ratio is:

___________________________________

RR =

___________________________________

SAR
n

SAR Qi

___________________________________

i =1

___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
Pressure Differential and Crack Air Velocity
Criterion 1 (Pressure Differential P)
For single room:
P: 0.05 in. of water (12.5 Pa)

___________________________________

For multiple-room space with staged pressurizations:


P: 0.02 in. ~ 0.03 in. (5 Pa ~ 7.5 Pa) for each pressure step

Criterion 2 (Average Crack Velocity V)

___________________________________

100 fpm (30 M/m)


From comparison below, the pressure criterion of P = 0.05 in. is much more
conservative than the velocity criterion of V = 100 fpm.
Pressurization
Criterion
Pressure
Differential P
Crack Leakage
Velocity V
Large Opening
Velocity V

Pressurization Criterion Comparison

Unit

___________________________________

0.06

0.0015 0.01

0.02

0.03

0.04

0.05

fpm

109

374

587

764

920

1,064 1,198 1,444 1,670

fpm

100

261

369

452

522

584

639

0.08

Basis

In

738

___________________________________

0.10

825

Eq. (1),
when n=0.65
Eq. (2a)

___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________

Room Pressurization Variables and


Control Strategies
Airflow differential between entering airflow (supply airflow,
SA) and leaving airflow (exhaust and/or return airflows,
EA+RA), normally called offset value (V), which equals the
total leakage airflow (Q) of the room.
To maintain a specific room pressure value, the rooms offset
airflow (V) must be controlled and maintained at the
appropriate value.
Rooms offset airflow can be controlled directly or indirectly.
The treatment of the room offset value defines a
pressurization control strategy. Typical pressurization control
techniques are: Direct Pressure-Differential Control,
Differential Flow Tracking Control, Hybrid Control and
Adaptive Control.

___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________

___________________________________
Direct Pressure-Differential Control (DP)
Utilizes a pressure differential sensor to measure the pressure difference
between a controlled room and an adjacent space such as a corridor. It basically
ignores the specific offset value as required, instead, it directly controls the
airflow control devices to achieve the required pressure differential.
Room
Exhaust
Valve

Room
Supply
Valve

SUPPLY
AIR

Hood
Exhaust

Hood
Exhaust

Total Exhaust
Air from Room

DP

Leakage
Air

Hood
Valve &
Controller

ROOM
CONTROLLER

DS
Door
Switch
CORRIDOR

Leakage
Air

Velocity
Sensor
CHEMICAL
LAB

___________________________________
___________________________________

Total Supply
Air to Room
DP
Sensor

___________________________________

or

Fume
Hood

___________________________________

Sash
Sensor

Thermostat

Suitable for a tightly constructed room with limited traffics.


Door switch is recommended to trigger a reduced pressure differential setpoint if the door opens.

___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________

Differential Flow Tracking Control (DF)


Intuitively assumes an offset value which is used as a flow difference

___________________________________

between the entering and leaving airflows to control their respective


airflow devices. Maintain the same offset value throughout the operation
to keep pressurization constant, or maintain a constant percentage offset
value which creates a weaker pressurization at lower flow.

___________________________________

Room
Exhaust
Valve

Room
Supply
Valve

SUPPLY
AIR

DP
Monitor

Hood
Exhaust

Total Exhaust
Air from Room

Hood
Exhaust

___________________________________

Total Supply
Air to Room

DP

Flow
Sensor

Leakage
Air

Flow
Sensor

___________________________________

Hood
Valve &
Controller

ROOM
CONTROLLER

DS
Door
Switch
CORRIDOR

Leakage
Air

Velocity
Sensor
CHEMICAL
LAB

___________________________________

or

Fume
Hood

Sash
Sensor

Thermostat

Suitable for open-style rooms or rooms with frequent traffics

___________________________________
___________________________________
Hybrid Control (DP+DF)
Combines the pressure accuracy of the direct pressure differential control
and the stability of the flow tracking control. The offset value is reset-able
based on pressure differential reading. The offset value reset schedule is
pre-determined and controllers parameters are fixed manually in field.
This method is also called cascaded control.
Room
Supply
Valve

SUPPLY
AIR

Room
Exhaust
Valve

Hood
Exhaust

Hood
Exhaust

Total Exhaust
Air from Room

___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________

Total Supply
Air to Room
DP
Sensor

Flow
Sensor

DP

Flow
Sensor

ROOM
CONTROLLER

Leakage
Air

___________________________________

Hood
Valve &
Controller

DS
Door
Switch
CORRIDOR

Velocity
Sensor
CHEMICAL
LAB

Fume
Hood

Thermostat

Leakage
Air

or
Sash
Sensor

___________________________________

Suitable for open-style rooms or rooms with frequent traffics

___________________________________
___________________________________
Multiple-Room (Suite)
Pressure Control Strategies

___________________________________

Single room control technologies


often cause problems in Suite
Pressure Control during air
balancing, since the following
phenomena are often ignored:

___________________________________

Adjusting one rooms offset


value will impact adjacent
rooms air pressures if they
were just balanced earlier.
One rooms air gain could be
another rooms air loss
through leakages.

___________________________________

___________________________________
___________________________________
Example - Pharmaceutical Aseptic Suite

___________________________________

___________________________________
Adaptive Control (DP+DF+AD)

___________________________________

The three traditional methods (DP, DF and DP+DF) are


either to ignore, assume or manually fix in field the
offset value respectively.
The adaptive (DP+DF+AD) approach directly accounts for
leakage flows between the rooms in a suite. It controls all
rooms pressures all together as an optimized system,
instead of controlling each room pressure independently. It
actively adjusts the flow offset of each room according to an
on-line pressurization model. The model uses flow and
pressure differential measurements to estimate the leakage
values between the rooms and adjust flow offset of each
room automatically.

___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________

Automated Room Air-tightness Test


Pre-condition for Truly Adaptive Control

___________________________________

Similarly as Blower Door


Test, but fully automated.
A rooms unique dynamic
leakage characterization can
also be automatically achieved
by digital controller, precision
pressure differential sensor
(0.001 in./0.25 Pa) and
airflow control devices (5%).
These devices are often
permanently installed in lab
and clean room environments.
This automated pressurization
test (Q-P data set) is faster
and cheaper, and can be
handled remotely.

___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________

Adaptive Control (Example: Control of Multiple Rooms)


DP

Designated
Leakage Flow

CLEANER
ROOM
0.06 In.

DS

CLEANEST
ROOM
0.08 In.

SUITE
CONTROLLER

DS

Return
Air
Valve

___________________________________

Pressure
Differential
Sensor

___________________________________

Door Switch

DS

DS

Valve Position
Outputs

GENERAL
CHEMICAL LAB
- 0.02 In.

DP

Exhaust
Air
Valve

Minor Leaks
Thru. Cracks

DP

DS

DS

___________________________________

CONTAINMENT
LAB
- 0.06 In.

Supply
Air
Valve

AIRLOCK
0.03 In.

___________________________________

Legend

DP

DP

Valve
Flowrate
Inputs

SUITE
CONTROLLER

DP

CORRIDOR
0.00 In.

Manifolded or
Open to Corridor

Room Pressure
Inputs

Door
Switch
Inputs

___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________

Air Flows between Rooms

___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________

Airflow Between Rooms

___________________________________

___________________________________
Personnel Flows between Rooms

___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________

Personnel Flow Between Rooms

___________________________________
___________________________________
More Considerations

___________________________________

Correction and Safety Factors Add as required


Correction Factors

___________________________________

Safety Factors

Refer to ASHRAE Handbooks 1999 &


2001, detailed procedures will be included in
the next phase of the study)

(Detailed procedures will be included in the


next phase of the study)

Stack effect
Wind effect
Interior zones with high
temperature or humidity
differences

Room background leaks


Duct leaks
AHU unit leak

___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________

Samples of Pressurization Control Devices


Flow Control & Measure

___________________________________

Pressure Measure

___________________________________

Static
Static Pressure
Pressure
Measuring
Measuring Probes
Probes

Control
Control
Damper
Damper

___________________________________

Air
Air Valve
Valve
Type
Type 11
Pressure
Pressure
Transmitter
Transmitter

___________________________________

Air
Air Valve
Valve
Type
Type 22

___________________________________

Pressure
Pressure
Transmitter
Transmitter
and
and Monitor
Monitor

Air
Air Valve
Valve -Type
Type 33

___________________________________
___________________________________
Case Study - Airflow Resistance and
Leakage Flow Simulation

___________________________________

Major and minor leakage openings, connection in parallel


and series

RM2

RM1

RM4

RM5

RM2

RM1

RM4

___________________________________

RM5

RM6

RM6

RM3

___________________________________

RM3

Network Flow with Major Openings Only


RMX

___________________________________

Network Flow with Major and Minor Openings

- Room Numbe

- Wall

- Flow Direction

- Induced Flow (by Pressurization)

- Node (Room)

- Flow Resistance @ Major Opening

- Flow Resistance @ Minor Opening

- Forced Flow (by Fan)

___________________________________
___________________________________

___________________________________
Modeling of Transient Pressurization

___________________________________

1. Pressurization Loss Characteristic During a Swing


Door Opening or Closing
(t )

= 2 W sin
2

(t )

t
A( t ) = H L( t ) = 2 H W sin

2
(t )

Room 2

(0 60 o )

P2
L

( 60 < 90 o )

= H W

___________________________________

Swing Door

P1

Room 1

___________________________________

P1 > P2

where,
L=width (gap) of door opening in. (cm)
W=width of door
in. (cm)
=angle of door opening degree
=speed of door turning degree/sec.
t=time
sec.
H=door height
in. (cm)
A=effective door opening width (gap) in2(cm2)

___________________________________

Wall

Transient Flow Through Swing Door

___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________

Modeling of Transient Pressurization

___________________________________

1. Pressurization Loss Characteristic During a Swing


Door Opening or Closing

___________________________________

Transient Pressure Differential Across When A Swing Door Opens


Pressure Drop Across Door
W idth of Door Opening

Autom atic Swing Door Opens to 90 in 3 Seconds; Door Size 4 ft. (W ) x 7 ft. (H).
Room s Across The Door/Wall Are Maintained with Cons tant Supply and Return Flows .
Initial Pressure Differential Ac ros s Door is 68.9 Pa, it drops to 1 Pa les s than 2 s ec onds.

Angle of Swing Door Opening (Degree)


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

60

40
40
30
30
20
20
10

10

Width (Gap) of Door Opening (in.)

50

50

Airlock Room Pressure Profile


0.100
0.095

First Door Opening

First Door Closing

1.5

2.5

Second Door Closing

0.080

Room Static Pressure (in. WC)

0.5

Second Door Opening

0.090

0.075

Both Doors Closed

0.085

0
3

Time of Door Opening (Second)

Cleanroom

0.070

___________________________________

0.065
0.060
0.055
0.050

___________________________________

0.045

Airlock

0.040
0.035
0.030
0.025
0.020
0.015

Corridor

0.010
0.005
0.000
-0.005
-0.010

___________________________________

Airlock Sliding Door Operation Cycle

___________________________________
Modeling of Transient Pressurization

___________________________________

2. Pressurization Loss Characteristic During a Sliding


Door Opening or Closing

___________________________________

Sliding Door
Room 2

P2
L

P
W

where,

Wall

W=width of door

P1 > P2

in. (cm)

Transient Flow Through Sliding Door

t=time

sec.

s=speed of door opening

in./sec. (cm/sec.)

H=door height

in. (cm)

___________________________________

P1

Room 1

L=width (gap) of door opening in. (cm)

___________________________________
___________________________________

A=effective door opening width (gap) in2(cm2)

___________________________________
___________________________________
Modeling of Transient Pressurization

___________________________________

2. Pressurization Loss Characteristic During a Sliding


Door Opening or Closing

___________________________________

Transient Pressure Differential Across W hen A Sliding Door Opens


Pressure Drop Across Door
W idth of Door Opening

Automatic Sliding Door Opens at Speed of 16 in./sec.; Door Size 4 ft. (W ) x 7 ft. (H);
Rooms Across The Door/W all Are Maintained with Constant Supply and Return Flows,
Initial Pressure Differential Across Door is 68.9 Pa, it drops to 1 Pa around 2 seconds.

60

70

60

___________________________________

40
40
30
30
20
20
10

10

0
0

0.5

1.5
T ime of Door Opening (Second)

2.5

Width (Gap) of Door O pening (in.)

50

50

Pressure Differentials Between Rooms

Pressure Differential between Rooms (in. WC)

Pressure Differential Across Door (Pa)

Pressure Differential Across Door (Pa)

___________________________________

60

70

0.100
0.095
0.090
0.085
0.080
0.075
0.070
0.065
0.060
0.055
0.050
0.045
0.040
0.035
0.030
0.025
0.020
0.015
0.010
0.005
0.000
-0.005
-0.010

First Door Opening

First Door Closing

Both Doors Closed

Second Door Opening

DP
(Cleanroom and Corridor)

DP (Door 1)

DP (Door 2)

Airlock Sliding Door Operation Cycle

Second Door Closing

___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________

___________________________________
Door Opening Transient Impact on
Pressurization Control

___________________________________

Any passive motor-driven or actuator-driven HVAC


system (such VAV box or valve) will not have enough
time to react effectively to prevent possible cross
contamination.
A single barrier door could cause a short duration of
backflow contamination until the motor or actuator
completes the modulation cycle of re-balancing,
additional means to prevent possible backflow
contamination, such as double-door airlock is necessary.

___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________

Dynamic Pressurization Control Strategies


- Airlock
Air Lock Type

CORRIDOR

AIRFLOW

CORRIDOR

AIRFLOW

AIRLOCK

AIRLOCK

++

++

Cascading
Bubble
Sink
DualCompartment

AIRFLOW

AIRFLOW

CLEANROOM

CLEANROOM

+++

CASCADING AIRLOCK

CORRIDOR

AIRFLOW

AIRLOCK

AIRLOCK

--

++

AIRFLOW

___________________________________
___________________________________

BUBBLE AIRLOCK

CORRIDOR

AIRFLOW

___________________________________

CLEANROOM

CLEANROOM

--

AIRFLOW

SINK AIRLOCK

___________________________________

AIRLOCK

___________________________________

DUAL COMPARTMENT AIRLOCK

___________________________________
___________________________________
Dynamic Pressurization Control Strategies
- Airlock
Airlock Physical Model

Network Flow Simulation

Cleanroom

___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________

0.06 in.

___________________________________

-6 -3 0 3 6

Wait!

-6
-3
0
3
6

P
Door 2

Airlock (Cascading)
P
Door 1

0.03 in.

P
Rooms

___________________________________

-6 -3 0 3 6

Corridor
0.00 in.

___________________________________
___________________________________
Result of Network Flow Simulation

___________________________________
___________________________________

Clean room
0.06 in.

___________________________________
-6 -3 0 3 6

Wait!

P
Door 2

Airlock (Cascading)
P

0.03 in.

Door 1

-6
-3
0
3
6

P
Rooms

___________________________________

-6 -3 0 3 6

Corridor
0.00 in.

___________________________________
___________________________________

___________________________________
CFD Model to Study Airlock Transient
Performance - Physical Conditions

___________________________________

Case 2 Class 100

Case 1 Class 10,000


(12000 CFM, 75 ACH)

___________________________________

(48000 CFM, 300 ACH)

8400 CFM, 300 ACH)

(2100 CFM, 75 ACH)


(560 CFM, 10ACH)

___________________________________

560 (CFM, 10ACH)

11948 CFM

Leakage 73 CFM

Leakage 73 CFM
8378 CFM

2078 CFM
Leakage 52 CFM

Leakage 52 CFM

Clean Room: 10000


Airlock: 10,000
Corridor: 100000

47948 CFM
Clean Room: 100
Airlock: 100
Corridor: 100000

___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________

Steady State Airflow Distribution


Case 1 Class 10,000

Case 2 Class 100

___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________

Steady State Cleanroom Particle


Concentration
Case 1 Class 10,000

Case 2 Class 100

___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________

Corridor Particles Enter Airlock Room


Case 1 Class 10,000

Case 2 Class 100

___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________

___________________________________
Airlock Particles Enter Clean Room and
Corridor
Case 2 Class 100

Case 1 Class 10,000

___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________

Airlock Particles Enter Clean Room and


Corridor
Case 2 Class 100

Case 1 Class 10,000

___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________

Variation of Corridor Particle Concentration


Case 2 Class 100

Case 1 Class 10,000

___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________

Airlock Door Transient Performance


Pressure Differential Across Cleanroom Door During Walk-Through
Profile of Pressure Differential Across Door
When Door Is Opening & Closing

Profile of Pressure Differential Across Door


When Door Is Opening & Closing

(Initial Condition: -15 Pa = -0.06 In.)

(Initial Condition: 5 Pa = 0.02 In.)

Door Opening

Door Closing

Test 1

Test 2
Test 3

Average

-5
-10
-15
-20
0

10

11

12

13

14

15

20
15
10
Test 1
Test 2
Test 3
Average

5
0
-5
Door Opening

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

___________________________________

(Initial Condition: 10 Pa = 0.04 In.)

20
15
Door Opening

Door Closing

10
Test 1

Test 2
Test 3

Average

-5
-10
-15

Pressure Differential Across Door (Pa)

25

-20

20
15
10
Test 1

Test 2
Test 3

0
Door Opening

Average

Door Closing

-5
-10
-15
-20

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

Time (Sec.)

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

Profile of Pressure Differential Across Door


When Door Is Opening & Closing

(Initial Condition: -5 Pa = -0.02 In.)

(Initial Condition: 15 Pa = 0.06 In.)

25
20
15
Door Opening

Door Closing

10
Test 1

Test 2
Test 3

Average

-5
-10
-15
-20
1

10

11

12

13

14

15

Pressure Differential Across Door (Pa)

25

20
15
10
Test 1

Test 2
Test 3

Average

-5
Door Opening

Door Closing

-10

___________________________________

-15
-20

16

Time (Sec.)

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

14

15

16

Time (Sec.)

Profile of Pressure Differential Across Door


When Door Is Opening & Closing

Profile of Pressure Differential Across Door


When Door Is Opening & Closing
(Initial Condition: 0 Pa = 0 In.)

(Initial Condition: 20 Pa = 0.08 In.)


25

20
15
Door Closing

10
Test 1

Test 2
Test 3

Average

-5
-10
-15
-20

Pressure Differential Across Door (Pa)

25

Door Opening

___________________________________

Time (Sec.)

Profile of Pressure Differential Across Door


When Door Is Opening & Closing

Pressure Differential Across Door (Pa)

Time (Sec.)

Profile of Pressure Differential Across Door


When Door Is Opening & Closing

(Initial Condition: -10 Pa = -0.04 In.)

Pressure Differential Across Door (Pa)

Door Closing

-10
-15
-20

16

Time (Sec.)

Profile of Pressure Differential Across Door


When Door Is Opening & Closing
25

Pressure Differential Across Door (Pa)

___________________________________

25

20
15
10

Pressure Differential Across Door (Pa)

Pressure Differential Across Door (Pa)

25

20
15
10
Test 1
Test 2
Test 3
Average

5
0

___________________________________

-5
Door Opening

Door Closing

-10
-15
-20

Time (Sec.)

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

Time (Sec.)

10

11

12

13

___________________________________

___________________________________
Contamination Risk Factor (CRF)
CRF is a criterion which is to quantity the effectiveness of cleanroom particle
containment in preventing the airborne particles migration into cleanroom.

___________________________________
___________________________________

CRF = PC / PO
CRF = Contamination Risk Factor
PC = Number of Particles inside Protected Cleanroom Near Door
PO = Number of Particles at Corridor Entrance Near Door

___________________________________

This criterion is applied for a Barrier Device which is to minimize particle


migration. This barrier could be single door, an airlock (two doors in series),
mini environment, or glove box.
The lower of the CRF level, the better barriers performance, or the better decontamination effectiveness. This expression can not only apply for airborne
particle, but also for airborne microorganism egress, in which the particle
counts will be replaced with Colony Forming Unit (CFU).

___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________

Particle Concentrations & CRF Across Cleanroom


Door Under Various Pressure Differentials
Particle Concentrations Across Cleanroom Door
When Door is Opening & Closing

Particle Concentrations Across Cleanroom Door


When Door is Opening & Closing
(Initial Condition: Depressurization @ -15 Pa = -0.06 In. )
Inside Cleanroom Door Average

Inside Cleanroom Door Average

30,000
CRF
= 18.9%

20,000
10,000

70,000

Door
Opening

60,000

Door Opening & Closing W/O People Traffic


A Person Walks Through Door

CRF
= 2.2%

10,000

9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22

Particle Concentrations Across Cleanroom Door


When Door is Opening & Closing

(Initial Condition: Depressurization @ -10 Pa = -0.04 In. )

(Initial Condition: Pressurization @ 10 Pa = 0.04 In. )

Outside Cleanroom Door Average

Ins ide Cleanroom Door Av erage

80,000

Outside Cleanroom Door Average

80,000

70,000

Door
Opening

60,000

Particle Concentrations Across Door


3
(Counts / FT )

Door
Closing

50,000
40,000
30,000
CRF
= 8.5%

20,000
10,000
0
0

70,000

Door
Opening

Door
Cl osing

60,000
50,000
40,000
30,000
CRF
= 0.7%

20,000

Inside Cleanroom Door A ver age

Particle Concentrations Across Door


3
(Counts / FT )

Door
Ope ning

Door
Closing

50,000

CRF
= 6.9%

20,000
10,000
0

70,000

D oor
Opening

60,000

Door
Clos ing

Regression (A Person Walks Through Door)

9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22

Particle Concentrations Across Cleanroom Door


When Door is Opening & Closing
(Initial Condition: Pressurization @ 20 Pa = 0.08 In. )

(Initial Condition: Neutral @ 0 Pa = 0 In. )


Ins ide Cleanroom Door Av erage

Outside Cleanroom Door A ver age

Ins ide Cleanroom Door A ver age

Outside Cleanroom Door A verage

Door
C losing

CRF
= 4.2%

20,000
10,000
0

Particle Concentrations Across Door


3
(Counts / FT )

80,000

Door
Opening

40,000

70,000

Door
Opening

60,000

Door
Closing

50,000
40,000
30,000
20,000
CRF
= 0.3%

10,000
0

9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22

Time (Sec.)

20

Door Opening & Closing W/O People Traffic

Time (Sec.)

80,000

30,000

15

A Person Walks Through Door

Particle Concentrations Across Cleanroom Door


When Door is Opening & Closing

70,000

10

___________________________________
___________________________________

25%
0

Time (Sec.)

60,000

Regression (Door Opening & Closing W/O People Traffic)


CRF
= 0.8%

20,000
10,000

9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22

50,000

(Note: 5 Pa = 0.02 In., Particle Measured @ 0.5 m)

50,000
40,000
30,000

0
0

-5

Initial Pressure Differential Across Door (Pa)

Airborne Particle Contamination Risk Factor (CRF)


Under Various Pressure Differentials Across Cleanroom Door

Outside Cleanr oom Door Average

80,000

40,000

-10

(Initial Condition: Pressurization @ 15 Pa = 0.06 In. )

Outside Cleanroom Door A verage

30,000

5%

9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22

Time (Sec.)

(Initial Condition: Depressurization @ -5 Pa = -0.02 In. )

70,000

10%

Particle Concentrations Across Cleanroom Door


When Door is Opening & Closing

80,000

60,000

15%

-15
0

Time (Sec.)

Inside Cleanroom Door Average

20%

0%

10,000
0

9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22

Particle Concentrations Across Cleanroom Door


When Door is Opening & Closing

9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22

Time (Sec.)

Contamination Risk Factor (CRF, %)

Particle Concentrations Across Door


3
(Counts / FT )

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22

Time (Sec.)

Time (Sec.)

Particle Concentrations Across Cleanroom Door


When Door is Opening & Closing
Ins ide Cleanroom Door Av erage

___________________________________

25%

30,000
20,000

Particle Concentrations Across Door


3
(Counts / FT )

(Note: 5 Pa = 0.02 In., Particle Measured @ 0.5 m)

D oor
Closing

50,000
40,000

Contamination Risk Factor (CRF, %)

Particle Concentrations Across Door


3
(Counts / FT )

Particle Concentrations Across Door


3
(Counts / FT )

Door
Clos ing

Particle Concentrations Across Door


3
(Counts / FT )

Outside Cleanroom Door A verage

80,000

D oor
Opening

60,000
50,000
40,000

___________________________________

Airborne Particle Contamination Risk Factor (CRF)


Under Various Pressure Differentials Across Cleanroom Door

(Initial Condition: Pressurization @ 5 Pa = 0.02 In. )

Outside Cleanroom Door A ver age

80,000
70,000

Regression Curve:
-0.1181*PD
CRF= 0.0332e
2
R = 0.9656
(No People Traffic)

20%

___________________________________

15%

Regression Curve:
-0.0703*PD
CRF = 0.0418e
2
R = 0.9129
(With People Traffic)

10%

5%

0%
-15

-10

-5

10

15

20

Initial Pressure Differential Across Door (Pa)

___________________________________
___________________________________

Dynamic Pressurization Control Strategies


Adjustable Pressure Stabilizer
A leakage regulator,
controllable pressure relief
damper across a wall to
maintain a minimum
required pressurization.
When a door is normally
closed, this damper should
stay open and maintain
normal pressure differential;
when the door opens, the
damper shall be
automatically closed either
by spring-loaded or counterweight gravity damper, and
maintain a lower while
acceptable pressure
differential.

___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________

Pressure
Stabilizer

___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________

Importance
In addition to design engineers and research
scientists, the information presented may also
benefit manufacturers in the fields of:
Air-handling unit control
Lab HVAC control
Prefabricated clean room
Precision environmental test chamber
Smoke management control
Air distribution system

___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________

___________________________________
Pressurization Study

___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________

Q&A

___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________

S-ar putea să vă placă și