Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Course in TEMAP
Submitted to
Prof. Lee, Jongsu
By Group (2)
Seungbae Lee, Kwoen
Lorena Farias, Aung Kyaw Oo
November 30,2006.
Outline
Problem definition
Motivation
Methodology
General Assumptions
Data Sources
Benefits, Costs and Formula applied
Policy Implication
Future Work
Problem Definition
Is it worthy to do Ph.D. in TEMAP for a
typical Korean?
What will be the costs and benefits for
him in trying to pursue for the degree?
In any cases, what should TEMAP take
action upon the result?
Motivation
PW(i)
300,000,000.00
250,000,000.00
200,000,000.00
150,000,000.00
100,000,000.00
50,000,000.00
0.00
0%
%
%
1%
5%
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
10
-50,000,000.00
-100,000,000.00
PW(i)
General assumptions
t= 0: In 2006, a Korean man graduated from an
Engineering
College. He is 24 years old now. He applies to TEMAP
and he is admitted.
Salary (Benefit)
Annual– 46 M Won
Growth rate (g) – 4,72%
Formula applied – [ Annual* (1+ g)^ (-1)* ( P/A, g’,30)] *
( P/A, i, 30)* ( P/F,i,6)
A man without Ph.D. ( But a graduate)
Salary ( Cost)
Annual – 30M Won
Growth Rate (g) – 4.06 %
Formula Applied – Annual* (1+ g)^ (-1) ( P/A, g’,36)
Tax on Annual salary
0-20,000,000
8%
20,000,001-40,000,000
17%
40,000,001-80,000,000
26%
80,000,001-
35%
Fees for the TEMAP (Costs)
Mechanisms like;
giving out more scholarship allowance (or)
free tuition (or)
sending the Ph.D. students abroad in turn
(or)
something beneficial for them (during and
after their study period)
should be applied.
Future Work
Q & A
This document was created with Win2PDF available at http://www.win2pdf.com.
The unregistered version of Win2PDF is for evaluation or non-commercial use only.
This page will not be added after purchasing Win2PDF.