Capstone Project Title

Firstname MiddleInitial Lastname(Author1)

Technological Institute of the Philippines Quezon City +63tendigitnumber

firstnameLastname@yahoo.com

Firstname MiddleInitial Lastname(Author2)

Technological Institute of the Philippines Quezon City +63tendigitnumber

Firstname MiddleInitial Lastname(Author3)

Technological Institute of the Philippines Quezon City +63tendigitnumber

firstnameLastname@yahoo.com

firstnameLastname@yahoo.com

Firstname MiddleInitial Lastname(Author4)

Technological Institute of the Philippines Quezon City +63tendigitnumber

Firstname MiddleInitial Lastname(Author5)

Technological Institute of the Philippines Quezon City +63tendigitnumber

firstnameLastname@yahoo.com

firstnameLastname@yahoo.com

Categories and Subject Descriptors

Security and Privacy Symmetric Cryptography, Block Cipher

General Terms
Algorithms, Security

 SO (l). Integrate IT based

1. INTRODUCTION
Trends Issues Objectives Contribution to ICT /Research Area

solutions into the user environment effectively.

SO (m). Understand best practices and standards and their applications. A theoretical framework is a collection of interrelated concepts, like a theory. Discuss IT best practices and standards and their applications to the capstone project. Include necessary illustrations or figures to substantiate the capstone project theme. Include a discussion of the design and development principles in the construction of the capstone project.

2. RELATED WORKS
Discuss the points of similarities and differences of reviewed literature with the proposed capstone project.

5. COMPUTING REQUIREMENTS
SO
(l). Integrate IT solutions into the environment effectively. based user

3. THE PROBLEM AND ITS BACKGROUND

SO (l). Integrate IT based
solutions into the environment effectively. user

Define the computing requirements appropriate to the solution of the research problems. Discuss the tradeoffs involved in the design choices of the system (economic, manpower, sociocultural, safety, culture, environment or related computing concerns)

Discuss the problem you intend to solve and identify an appropriate ITbased solution.

4. THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK

6. WORK BREAKDOWN STRUCTURE

SO (e). Function effectively as an individual and as a member or leader in diverse teams and in multi-disciplinary settings. The WBS should include the scope, tasks of each group member, schedule, and other significant elements.

Word may try to automatically underline hotlinks in the references but the correct style is NO underlining. References are in 9-point but the section is ragged right. References should be published materials accessible to the public.

7. EVALUATION
Discuss how you intend to measure or attain the capstone project objectives. Identify the appropriate evaluators of your output.

Internal technical reports may be cited only if they are easily accessible(i.e. give the address to obtain the report within the citation) and may be obtained by the reader. Proprietary information may not be cited. Private communication should be acknowledged, not referenced. (e.g., [Robertson, personal communication]).

8. REFERENCES
Use the ACM Reference Format for references, i.e. a numbered list at the end of the article, ordered alphabetically and formatted accordingly. See example of some typical reference types in the new ACM Reference Format.

MOST COMMON REFERENCE TYPES FORMATTED FOR ACM JOURNAL For an article in a journal: ABDELBAR, A.M., AND HEDETNIEMI, S.M. 1998. Approximating MAPs for belief networks in NP-hard and other theorems. Artificial Intelligence 102, 21-38. For a book: GINSBERG, Readings in M. 1987. Nonmonotonic

Acceptable abbreviations for journal names can be found in http://library.caltech.edu/refere nce/abbreviations/

Reasoning. Morgan Kaufmann, Los Altos, CA

For an article in a book or collection: GREINER, R. 1999. Explanation-based learning. In The Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science, R. WILSON AND F. KEIL, Eds. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 301-303.

HORAN, B., GARDNER, M., and SCOTT, J. 2009 Mirtle: a Mixed Reality Teaching & Learning Environment. Technical Report. UMI Order Number: SERIES13103., Sun Microsystems, Inc. For an article in a Newspaper: WHITE, E. 1999. Chatting a singer up the pop charts. Wall Street Journal.

For an article in a conference proceedings: MAREK, W., AND TRUSZCZYNSKI, M. 1989. Relating autoepistemic and default logics. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, Toronto, Canada, May 1989, H. BRACHMAN AND R. REITER, Eds. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA, 276-288.

For a Web Page: GOOGLE, 2008. Google adsense. http://www.google.com/adsens e

OTHER EXAMPLES FROM THE ACM WORD TEMPLATE FOR SIG SITE [1] , M., Debray, S. K., and Peterson, L. L. 1993. Reasoning about naming systems. ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst. 15, 5 (Nov. 1993), 795-825. DOI= http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/161468. 16147.

For a dissertation: BRANDON, J. 2007. Similarity of temporal query logs. Doctoral dissertation. University of California, Los Angeles.

[2] Ding, W. and Marchionini, G. 1997. A Study on Video Browsing Strategies. Technical Report. University of Maryland at College Park. [3] Frhlich, B. and Plate, J. 2000. The cubic mouse: a new device for three-dimensional input. In

For a technical report:

Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (The Hague, The Netherlands, April 01 - 06, 2000). CHI '00. ACM, New York, NY, 526-531. DOI= http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/332040. 332491. [4] Tavel, P. 2007. Modeling and Simulation Design. AK Peters Ltd., Natick, MA. [5] Sannella, M. J. 1994. Constraint Satisfaction and Debugging for Interactive User Interfaces. Doctoral Thesis. UMI Order Number: UMI Order No. GAX95-09398., University of Washington. [6] Forman, G. 2003. An extensive empirical study of feature selection metrics for text classification. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 3 (Mar. 2003), 1289-1305. [7] Brown, L. D., Hua, H., and Gao, C. 2003. A widget framework for augmented interaction in SCAPE. In Proceedings of the 16th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (Vancouver, Canada, November 02 - 05, 2003). UIST '03. ACM, New York, NY, 1-10. DOI= http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/964696. 964697.

[8] Yu, Y. T. and Lau, M. F. 2006. A comparison of MC/DC, MUMCUT and several other coverage criteria for logical decisions. J. Syst. Softw. 79, 5 (May. 2006), 577-590. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2005. 05.030.