Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
PENILAIAN / EVALUATION Tugasan ini menyumbang sehingga 30% daripada jumlah markah kursus berkenaan dan akan dinilai berdasarkan kepada Rubrik yang dilampirkan. / This assignment accounts for 30% of the total marks for the course and shall be assessed based on the Rubrics attached . Anda akan diberikan maklum balas tentang tugasan ini sebelum Peperiksaan Akhir Semester bermula / You would be given feedback on the assignment before the Final Semester Examination commences. PLAGIARISME: POTONGAN MARKAH / PLAGIARISM: MARKS DEDUCTION Amaran: Tugasan yang diserahkan, secara automatik, akan disemak untuk menentukan kadar pertindihan. Jika plagiarisme dikesan, markah akan dipotong seperti berikut: / Warning: The submitted assignment will automatically undergo a similarity check. If plagiarism is detected, marks would be deducted as follows: Tugasan dengan pertindihan kandungan antara 10 - 30 % : potongan 20% daripada jumlah markah yang diperoleh. Tugasan dengan pertindihan kandungan antara 31 - 50 % : potongan 40% daripada jumlah markah yang diperoleh. Tugasan dengan pertindihan kandungan lebih daripada 50%: Markah sifar akan diberikan. Assignments with 10 - 30 % overlap with others: 20% deduction from the total marks scored. Assignments with 31 - 50 % overlap with others: 40% deduction from the total marks scored. Assignments with more than 50% overlap with others: Zero mark would be given.
ASSIGNMENT QUESTION
The purpose of this assignment is to evaluate your understanding of the importance of problem solving and reasoning in the teaching of mathematics. Your tasks are basically outlined below: i. Read the article on Mathematics Teaching for Understanding: Reasoning, Reading, and Formative Assessment by Paula Miller and Dagmar Koesling. This article is available at the following website: http://pubs.cde.ca.gov/tcsii/ch2/documents/Plaut_Chap_5.pdf ii. iii. iv. Discuss in detail what the author is trying to communicate with the reader. Compare the content of the article with Topic 3: Teaching of Problem-Solving and Reasoning, in your SBEM3303 module. Draw a conclusion based on your readings.
The descriptors in the rubrics will assist you in completing your assignment.
LAMPIRAN / ATTACHMENT RUBRIK TUGASAN / ASSIGNMENT RUBRICS KOD KURSUS/COURSE CODE: SBEM3303 SEMESTER: MAY2012
Low Criteria 1. Discuss in detail the content of the article Marks Weight 2 0 No explanation provided. 1 Very basic discussion of the article; insufficient explanation of the main theme of the article; very limited summary of the examples and no clear classification. Fair 2 Incomplete discussion of the article; adequate explanation of the main theme of the article; clear summary of the examples which have been classified according to the different approaches. Moderate comparison of content in the module and article; moderately adequate evaluation of both documents; demonstrates a good attempt to analyze the similarities and differences. Above average 3 Quite complete discussion of the article; good explanation of the main theme of the article; good summary of the examples which have been classified according to the different approaches. Good comparison of content in the module and article; adequate evaluation of both documents; demonstrates clear progression of ideas in analyzing the similarities and differences. Excellent 4 Complete and clear discussion of the article; excellent explanation of the main theme of the article; excellent summary of the examples which have been classified according to the different approaches. Excellent comparison of content in the module and article; critically evaluates both documents; demonstrates very clear progression of ideas in analyzing the similarities and differences. Max Marks 8
2. Compare the content of the article with Topic 3: Teaching of Problem-Solving and Reasoning in your SBEM3303 module.
No comparison attempted.
Fair comparison of content in the module and article; minimal evaluation of both documents; only restating without analyzing the similarities and differences.
12
No conclusion drawn
Brief summary, lacks details, unclear and no integration of main points; disconnected flow.
Quite clear summary of main points presented but weak integration of points in the assignment, Choppy flow.
Good and clear summary of main points, some attention to details; quite interesting and good integration of points presented in the assignment; fairly smooth flow.
Excellent and very clear summary of main points great attention to details, interesting and thoughtful integration of points in the assignment, very smooth flow.
4. Mechanics of writing, overall presentation, concern for spelling, and sentence structure
0.5
Unacceptable presentation
Report is not well organised; contains either many errors or a few important errors that block the reader's understanding and ability to see connections between ideas.
Report is quite organized but contains several errors, which may temporarily confuse the reader; however does not affect the overall understanding.
Report is satisfactorily organized; contains few spelling, punctuation, and grammatical errors, but readable.
Well structured and organized report; almost entirely free of spelling, punctuation, and grammatical errors; Interesting to read
Total points
7.5
30