English Language Journal Vol 4, (2011) 126-146 ISSN 1823 6820

REFERENCES Abdullah, S., Mahadi, R., Ahmad, I. and Ahmad, R. (2009). Enhancing English proficiency among UniMAP foreign students through the use of computer-aided instruction. In E-proceedings of the 2nd International Conference of Teaching and Learning (ICTL 2009), INTI University College, Malaysia.. more detailed??? Abdul Rahim, N. (2005). The impact of learner involvement in materials and task design on motivation in learners of English: an investigation focusing on Storyboard software at Universiti Putra Malaysia. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Universiti Putra Malaysia, Malaysia. Abu Bakar, N. (2007). Technology and learner autonomy: teachers and students perception towards learner autonomy in a computer-based learning environment in a Malaysian context. Proceedings of the Independent Learning Association Japan Conference, Kanda University of International Studies, Chiba, Japan. date??? AbuSeileek, A. & Rababah, G. (2007). The effect of computer-based grammar instruction on the acquisition of verb tenses in an EFL context. JALT CALL Journal, 3(12), 1-17. Al-Zubi, M. A. (2010). The effects of the Internet on King Saud University students grammar achievement. Journal of Human Sciences, 45, 1-32. Burrus, J. (2009). Adult ESL student perceptions on computer assisted language learning. Unpublished MSc thesis. University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Calvo, M. V. (1997). Computer Assisted Language Learning: Revision of some theoretical principles from a practical case. Encuentro: Revista de Investigacin e Innovacin en el aula de idiomas, 9, 127-134. Chapelle, C. (1998). Multimedia CALL: Lessons to be learned from research on instructed SLA. Language Learning & Technology, 2(1), 21-39. Chapelle, C. (2005). Autonomy meets individualization in CALL. In J-M. Debaisieux & A. Boulton (Eds.) TIC et autonomie dans lapprentissage des langues (pp. 77-88). Nancy: CRAPEL. Chapelle,C. and Jamieson,J. (1986). Computer assisted language learning as a predictor of success in acquiring English as a second language. TESOL Quarterly, 20, 27-46.

143

English Language Journal Vol 4, (2011) 126-146 ISSN 1823 6820

Davies, G. (2008). ICT4LT: an online training course in information and communications technology for language teachers (intermediate level). Slough: Thames Valley University. Felix, U. (2008). The unreasonable effectiveness of CALL: what have we learned in two decades of research? ReCALL, 20(2), 141-161. Gardner, D. & Miller, L. (1999). Establishing Self-access: from Theory to Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Ghandoura, W. A. (2006). College ESL student attitudes and beliefs about computer-assisted writing classes. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Indiana University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania. Gndz, N. (2005). Computer assisted language learning. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 1(2), 193-214. Han, W. (2008). Benefits and barriers of computer assisted language learning and teaching. US-China Foreign Language, 6(9), 40-43. Hong, K. H. (2009). L2 teachers experience of CALL technology education and the use of computer technology in the classroom: the case of Franklin County, Ohio. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Ohio State University, Ohio. Horrigan, S. (2009). Skynet: Speech-enabled Conversational Agent to Support Second Language Acquisition research project at the University of California, Berkeley. Retrieved from http://www. cs.berkeley.edu/~eomer/files/MSReport.pdf date??? Ismail, I. S. (2008). Factors hindering the integration of CALL in a tertiary institution. ASEAN Journal of University Education, 4(2), 35-59. Kennedy, C. & Levy, M. (2009). Sustainability and computerassisted language learning: Factors for success in a context of change. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 22(5), 445463. Lai, C. & Kritsonis, W. (2006). The advantages and disadvantages of computer technology in second language acquisition. Doctoral Forum: National Journal for Publishing and Mentoring Doctoral Student Research, 3(1), 1-6. Lee, K. W. (2000). English teachers barriers to the use of computer assisted language learning. The Internet TESL Journal, 6(12). Retrieved from: http://iteslj.org/Articles/Lee-CALL barriers. html date??? Liu, M., Moore, Z., Graham, L. & Lee, S. (2002). A look at the research on computer-based technology use in second language learning: Review of literature from 1990-2000. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34(3), 250-273.
144

English Language Journal Vol 4, (2011) 126-146 ISSN 1823 6820

Lu, M. T., Wu, C. Y., Martin, E. & Shah, R. (2009). The Effects of Computer-Assisted Language Learning (CALL) in Grammar Classrooms. In G. Siemens & C. Fulford (Eds.) Proceedings of the World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications. Chesapeake, VA: AACE. Marimuthu, R. & Goh, Y. (2005). DynEd Language Learning Software: How far does it subscribe to ARCS by J. M. Keller? Paper presented at the National Convention on Educational Technology, Kuala Terengganu, Malaysia date??? Masri, M., Wan Ahmad, W. F., Nordin, S. M. & Sulaiman, S. (2009). The effects of a courseware towards pre-university students learning in literature. In H. Badioze Zaman, P. Robinson, M. Petrou, P. Olivier, H. Schrder & T. Shih (Eds.) Visual Informatics: Bridging Research and Practice. Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer. Mohamad, F. & Mohamad Amin, N. (2009). The effectiveness of customized software in teaching grammar. E-proceedings of the 2nd International Conference of Teaching and Learning (ICTL), INTI University College, Malaysia date??? Mustafar, N. (2006). The use of computer assisted learning (CALL) courseware in learning literature a case study of form four students of Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan Dato Penggawa Barat, Pontian, Johor (Unpublished Masters thesis). Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai. Nutta, J. (1998). Is computer-based grammar instruction as effective as teacher-directed grammar instruction for teaching L2 structures? CALICO Journal, 16(1), 49-62. Reinders, H. (2000). Do it yourself? A learners perspective on learner autonomy and self-access language learning. Unpublished MA thesis. University of Groningen, Netherlands. Son, J. B. (2008). Using web-based language learning activities in the ESL classroom. International Journal of Pedagogies and Learning, 4(4), 34-43. Tanner, M. W. & Landon, M. M. (2009). The effects of computerassisted pronunciation readings on ESL learners use of pausing, stress, intonation, and overall comprehensibility. Language Learning & Technology, 13(3), 5165. Taylor, L. (1990). Teaching and learning vocabulary. New York, NY: Prentice Hall. Topkaya, E. Z. (2010). Pre-service English teachers perceptions of computer self-efficacy and general self-efficacy. TOJET: Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 9(1), 143-156.

145

English Language Journal Vol 4, (2011) 126-146 ISSN 1823 6820

Wang, C. X. & Wang, Y. (2004). Integrating technology into ESL learning environment: Use process writing approach as an example. In R. Ferdig et al. (Eds.) Proceedings of the Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 1442-1447). Chesapeake, VA: AACE. Warschauer, M. (1996). Computer-assisted language learning: an introduction. In S. Fotos (Ed.) Multimedia language teaching (pp. 3-20). Tokyo: Logos International. Zamari, Z. M. & Adnan, A. H. M. (2010). The Good English Language Learner on Facebook: an extension of CALL and SALL. In e-Proceedings of the 3rd Malaysia International Conference on Academic Strategies in English Language Teaching. Shah Alam: Academy of Language Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA.

146