Sunteți pe pagina 1din 4

Roads and Trail Networks

4 Lane Upgrade
4 Lane Proposed
3 Lane Upgrade
3 Lane Proposed
2 Lane Proposed
Existing Trails
Proposed Trail
Place Types
Existing Proposed
Commercial (high)
Commercial (med)

CurrentPolicy Commercial (low)


Mixed Use (high)
Mixed Use Commercial
Mixed Use Residential

Scenario Residential (high)


Residential (med)
Residential (low)
Open Space, Civic, and Government

Very low-density dispersed


pattern.

50% rural residential (0.5


du/acre). 1% mixed-use.

Limited pedestrian
connections. No fixed-route
transit. All of the land within the
Town would be required to
Requires 100% of available accommodate future growth
land (2,382 acres)* patterns at low densities.

No changes to current Little to no land could be


policy. preserved for open space.
Roads and Trail Networks
4 Lane Upgrade
4 Lane Proposed
3 Lane Upgrade
3 Lane Proposed
2 Lane Proposed
Existing Trails
Proposed Trail
Place Types
Existing Proposed
Commercial (high)

Scenario1 Commercial (med)


Commercial (low)
Mixed Use (high)
Mixed Use Commercial
Mixed Use Residential
Residential (high)
Residential (med)
Residential (low)
Open Space, Civic, and Government

Low-density dispersed
pattern.

61% low-density residential


(1-3 du/acre); 3% mixed-use.

Pedestrian networks in
Slightly increases the
residential areas.
density of built up areas with
Automobile access in
infill development.
commercial corridors.
Large areas of town would
Requires 57% of available
be developed with low to
land (1,050 acres less than
medium density residential
policy trend)
and commercial.
Similar to current policy,
43% of available land could
emphasizing higher
be preserved as open space.
densities.
Roads and Trail Networks
4 Lane Upgrade
4 Lane Proposed
3 Lane Upgrade
3 Lane Proposed
2 Lane Proposed
Existing Trails
Proposed Trail
Place Types
Existing Proposed
Commercial (high)

Scenario2 Commercial (med)


Commercial (low)
Mixed Use (high)
Mixed Use Commercial
Mixed Use Residential
Residential (high)
Residential (med)
Residential (low)
Open Space, Civic, and Government

Medium density
concentrated pattern.

47% low-density residential; Some nodes of mixed use


8% mixed-use. would be created around the
edges of developed areas.
Pedestrian & bicycle
networks among residential Infill and density in and
& some commercial areas. around Downtown Ashland
to create a mixed use center.
Requires 34% of available
land (1,540 acres less than Lower density residential
policy trend). and commercial uses would
still be created.
Policies require increased
densities and more 66% of available land could
promotion of mixed use. be preserved as open space.
Roads and Trail Networks
4 Lane Upgrade
4 Lane Proposed
3 Lane Upgrade
3 Lane Proposed
2 Lane Proposed
Existing Trails
Proposed Trail
Place Types
Existing Proposed
Commercial (high)

Scenario3 Commercial (med)


Commercial (low)
Mixed Use (high)
Mixed Use Commercial

 Mixed Use Residential


Residential (high)
Residential (med)
Residential (low)
Open Space, Civic, and Government

Medium to high density


concentrated pattern.

33% low-density residential;


15% mixed-use.

Pedestrian & bicycle


networks and local transit
service throughout Heavy emphasis on infill and
commercial & residential density in and around
areas. Downtown Ashland to create
a dense mixed use center.
Requires 25% of available
land (1,800 acres less than Smaller, less dense mixed
policy trend). use centers would be
developed around the edges
Policies require increased
densities and a stronger Allows for greatest
emphasis on mixed use. preservation of open space
– 75% of available land.

S-ar putea să vă placă și