1Scoring Rubric for Electronic Portfolio

Criteria Purpose of Portfolio Advanced/Proficient (4-5 pts) Basic (2-3 pts.) Below Basic (0-1 pts.) Introduction/table of contents is not included. Self Eval. Total The introduction/table of contents explicitly An introduction/table of contents is stated, but mentions important concepts (such as breadth of there is missing information. content and intended audience) and prepares the Reader might be confused. reader for what is to come. Internet resources, related to specific academic Internet resources, related to specific academic content, are included as hyperlinks within the content, are included as hyperlinks within the portfolio and include the title, URL, and portfolio and include the title, URL, and description. Annotations indicate the web links description. Limited text is included to indicate have been evaluated by the author. Hyperlinks the web links have been evaluated by the author. are properly functioning. Some hyperlinks may not be properly functioning. Type size and/or color, images, graphics and sounds are used well. Appropriate use of backgrounds and text are used to promote understanding and readability. Information presented is error-free.

Web Resources

Internet resources are limited or are missing. Hyperlinks to internet resources do not work and/or text describing the links is limited or missing.

Overall Appeal Spelling Punctuation Grammar

Type size and/or color, images, graphics, There is little difference in contrast background, and sounds are mostly used well. Some between text/background, OR color, improvements could be made to improve graphics, sounds interfere with text, and understanding and readability. legibility suffers. Some errors may be present in spelling, grammar, There are errors in spelling, punctuation, or punctuation. or grammar. The portfolio is unorganized. Internal navigation links are either not present or not functioning properly. Contact information is missing.

Usability

The portfolio is well designed, logical and easy to The portfolio is not intuitive, & needs further maneuver. On each page there is a readily organization. A link back to the homepage is not identifiable link back to the homepage. Contact available on each page. Contact information is information is included where needed. available, but could be included on more pages.

Criteria Technology Integration and Content Related to Standards & Objectives

Advanced/Proficient (15-20 pts) Portfolio describes/exemplifies the model(s) to integrate technology to be utilized in the classroom. Specific teaching strategies to meet the needs of diverse learners are evident. All relevant course assignments and projects are included. Content and related artifacts included to support proficient or advanced attainment of technology standards and course objectives.

Basic (9-14 pts.) Portfolio describes/exemplifies ways to integrate technology but does not clearly describe specific teaching strategies to be utilized. Most relevant course assignments or projects are included. Content and related artifacts included to support basic attainment of technology standards. And course objectives

Below Basic (0-8 pts.) Integration strategies/examples are missing. Very few or no relevant course assignments or projects are included. Content and related artifacts not included to support attainment of technology standards and course objectives

Self Eval.

Total

Total (40 Pts. Possible)