Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Liberated Fines: High surface area Need high collector and low depressant
Intermediate: fast floating lower collector need, composites need depressant Coarse Particles Low liberation
Recovery
5
10
30
50
80
100
150
200
Size (microns)
FIG 1 - The conventional view fines dont float.
to P80 of 7 m is essential to produce a saleable concentrate. At Mt Isa, grinding streams to P80 of 12 m and 7 m is essential to get adequate recovery. In these plants, creating slimes is absolutely essential for good flotation recovery. Between them, these operations produce around 1 Mt/y of concentrates by flotation of particles mostly finer than 10 m, at over 80 per cent recovery. In fact, the best flotation recovery is in the slimes. At MRM, 96 per cent of the individual particles recovered are finer than 2.5 m. So fine particles do float and they float very well, as shown by Figure 2, the recovery-size curve for sphalerite from rougher concentrate at Mt Isa.
100% 50%
Recovery
Size Distribution
C6
C5/C4
C3-C1
38/53
75
0-4 m
4-8 m
8-16 m
16-38 m
38-75 m
Size fraction
905
a small volume can further reduce the amount of cells needed to reduce entrainment. Low footprint and low capital and froth washing are good, but they should not be confused with the task of making particles hydrophobic the right reagents on clean surfaces do this.
ensure adequate residence time, apply froth washing if beneficial, and choose the cheapest cell available that meets these criteria.
Recovery
If you find this controversial, look again at Figure 2. Flotation at Mt Isa and MRM is done in five different types of cells, usually chosen because they were cheap (often because we already had them in the plant or in the scrap yard). We put a lot of science into achieving the results in Figure 2, but none of it was about flotation mechanisms, it was about achieving the correct level of liberation and the right surface chemistry. Once this is achieved flotation is easy in any device. Put simply, flotation impellors do not grind composites and they do not make particles hydrophobic. They just make bubbles. The choice between cells is purely one of what capital is needed to achieve the required residence time, and to reduce entrainment (either by dilution cleaning or by froth washing). In Mt Isas case, new Jameson cells would have been a great technical solution, using fine bubbles to quickly recover fines in a small space that makes froth washing easy. While this would have been a low capital solution, it could not compete with using the existing unfashionable old cells. Of course, smaller bubbles have much higher surface area, so fines that are already hydrophobic will be collected in a smaller volume. In an existing plant with fixed flotation capacity, this faster flotation rate converts into higher recovery in the fixed equipment. This is probably the source of the misunderstanding that fines need small bubbles. Big bubbles will still float hydrophobic fines, just more slowly so more cells are needed. So a device that creates smaller bubbles like the Jameson cell or other pneumatic devices will have a smaller footprint and lower capital to achieve the same recovery, and the ability to froth wash
10
30
50
80
100
150
200
Size (microns)
FIG 3 - Conceptual staged grind-float circuit performance.
The Mount Isa circuit developed into an excellent balance of the needs of different minerals, relying on several stages of grinding and flotation. The design principals are:
float minerals in narrow size distributions; minimise circulating loads grind cleaner feed rather than
cleaner tail, and open circuit where possible;
906
TABLE 1
Comparison of various grinding technologies independent laboratory data.
Feature Grinding intensity (kW/L) Residence time to 15 m (min) Power usage to 15 m (kWh/t) Media material Media size (mm) IsaMill 0.54 0.6 17.4 Various 0.8 - 1.6 Tower Mills 0.005 154 59.6 Steel 9 - 12 Vertical Pin Mills 0.15 - 0.18 7-9 37.5 - 39.0 Steel 6-8
production of ultrafines, and poor control of top-size. To classify sharply below 20 m needs small cyclones, theoretically two-inch diameter. However this is expensive, and in our experience they are virtually inoperable in a minerals plant. So most operators compromise and use bigger cyclones but the flatter size distribution compromises grinding efficiency and flotation performance (and especially leaching performance if this is the downstream process). The IsaMill addresses this by classifying within the mill using the product separator effectively an internal centrifuge with a tip speed of 20 m/s, giving sharper separation than even two-inch cyclones. This allows the mill to produce a very sharp size distribution in open circuit configuration without cyclones.
Use the most efficient grinding method high intensity stirred mills versus tower mills
Fine grinding is capital intensive and energy intensive, so it is crucial to get good power efficiency at the full plant scale. As Figure 4 shows, this broadly means tumbling mills to around 40 m, and stirred milling for finer sizes. Tower Mills are more efficient than ball mills for sizes below about 40 m, mainly because they typically use smaller balls and operate at slower speeds that favour attrition grinding over impact breakage. However Tower Mills struggle to grind below about 25 m, and are less efficient than the new high intensity stirred mills like IsaMill or detritors. These stirred mills are more efficient, and can grind to much finer sizes, eg below 7 m, because they can operate with very fine media (eg 1 - 2 mm for the IsaMill), and with very high intensity, both of which greatly accelerate the attrition mechanism. Table 1 (Gao and Weller, 1993) shows the very high intensity in a stirred mill, assisting grinding and cleaning surfaces.
140
IsaMill -2 mm media
120
100 80 60 40 20 0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
Classification is crucial
High grinding efficiency requires good classification; and good classification also produces narrow size distributions ideal for flotation. Too often fine grinding circuits are constrained by poor classification, causing higher energy consumption, unnecessary
907
FIG 5 - Mt Isa lead regrind IsaMills and the lead Jameson cell.
Tailings
3 x 1.1MW IsaMills 34% Pb Rec Pb Conc Jameson Cell Pb Cleaners 46% Pb Rec Pb Conc
3 x1.1MW IsaMills
Zn Retreatment Ro
Tailings
Zn Retreatment Cl Zn Conc
6% Zn Rec
908
Pumping and pipework systems that dont entrain air into the
thickened concentrate, to avoid lowering the feed density to the filtering systems.
with fresh clean surfaces and tailored reagents, the fines float
faster than they did when mixed with coarse particles; and
the lower reagent additions; elimination of circulating loads between roughing and
cleaning a lot of power (and flotation capacity) is wasted in conventional circuits by pumping circulating loads of 100 300 per cent; and
909
Zn Rec %
65.0 62.5
Reduced grinding & flotation capacity, due to equipment relocation during construction. Apr May Jun 1999 Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1999 Jan Feb Mar 2000 Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov 2000
100
Apr-99
80
Oct-00
Recovery (%)
60
Increased recovery in fine sizes Moved particles from low recovery and low grade fraction to higher recovery and higher grade fines fraction
40
20
Net result - 10% recovery increase and 2% concentrate grade increase
0 1 10 100
Size (microns)
FIG 8 - Zn recovery versus size before and after IsaMilling.
Another advantage of the lack of circulating loads is that cleaner densities remain low, thereby assisting dilution cleaning.
910
Zn Recovery
100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0%
C7 C6 C5/C4 C3/C2 C1/38 53 75 50.0%
Zn Recovery
100%
50.0%
Recovery
37 m zinc circuit
Recovery
12 m zinc circuit
Size Distribution
20.0% 15.0% 10.0%
Size Distribution
40% 30% 20%
5.0%
10%
0.0%
0%
C7 C6 C5/C4 C3/C2 C1/38 53 75
0-4um
4-8um
8-16um
16-30um 30-53um
Size fraction
0-4um
4-8um
8-16um
16-30um
30-53um
Size fraction
70 m Primary Grind/Float
Prefloat Pb Ro
37 m Secondary Grind/Float
Pb Ro / Scav Zn Ro Zn Ro /Scav Ball Milling
Zn Recovery Tailings
100% 90% 80% 70%
50%
Zn Columns
Tailings
Recovery
7 m zinc circuit
12 m Regrind/Float
46% Pb Rec
Zn Cleaners*
2 x 1.1MW ISaMills
1 x 0.52MW Tower Mill
30%
Size Distribution
15% 10% 5% 0%
Zn Conc
20% 10% 0%
C7 C6 C5/C4 C3-C1 38/53 75
12 m Regrind/Float
3 x1.1MW IsaMills Zn Retreat Ro * 3 stages of closed circuit conventional cleaning Tailings Zn Conc
0-4um
4-8um
8-16um
16-38um
38-75um
Zn Retreatment Cl
Size fraction
7 m Regrind/Float
6% Zn rec, 47% Zn
Combine 37 m circuit with 12 m circuit with 7 m circuit for overall zinc cleaning performance graph below
Overall Zinc Circuit Recovery by Size
100% 90% 80%
Zinc Reco very in size fraction % 50%
Recovery
Size Distribution
75 Size fraction
0-4um
4-8um
8-16um
16-38um
38-75um
FIG 9 - Zinc recovery in cleaning stages and for overall cleaning circuit.
18 m. At this size about 90 per cent of the PGMs associated with base metal sulfides are liberated and can easily be recovered with xanthate collector if the surfaces are clean. Two major platinum producers have applied these advances by installing IsaMills in their circuits with great success. Consistent with experience at Mt Isa and MRM, Platinum producers are increasingly realising that cleaner feed is the best target stream. Inert grinding of cleaner feed increases the flotation rate and performance by removing surface layers of talc, oxidation and iron hydroxides. By improving liberation and flotation kinetics immediately, particles in rougher concentrate have an
opportunity to report quickly to a high-grade final concentrate, rather than being forced to recirculate to get to a grinding mill and then being sent back to roughing. The practicality of achieving this has been greatly enhanced by the 2.6 MW M10 000 IsaMill installed by Anglo Platinum. All rougher concentrate is sent directly to a single IsaMill before cleaning. No cyclones are needed before or after the mill, since the internal product separator allows the mill to handle a wide variety of feed densities, and produces a very sharp product size distribution. Cleaner tailings can be open-circuited a novelty in platinum flotation, but with immense benefits for the roughing circuit. Up
911
to 50 per cent of platinum roughing capacity is often consumed by circulating loads, and frequently the roughers are operated to suit the troublesome recirculated particles rather than the fresh feed. By applying the right grinding technology in the right place, circuits can be designed with considerably less flotation capacity in both roughing and cleaning. This is the opposite of the common view that finer grinding will require more flotation. A more conservative, but still successful, application is to regrind cleaner tailings, then to float mill product in a separate small cleaning circuit tailored for the narrow, fine size distribution produced by the IsaMill. Because liberation and kinetics are good, fine cleaner tailing can report to final tailing. This practice is used by Lonmin. Plant data is not made available for publication. However testwork on a wide range of Platinum ores and a wide range of operators shows that a single IsaMill regrinding stage increases overall PGM recovery by four to 15 per cent, at the same or higher concentrate grade.
REFERENCES
Curry, D, 2002. The Impact of IsaMill technology on modern concentrator design, paper presented to MMMA New Technologies Conference, Carltonville, RSA. Frew, J A, Davey, K J and Glen, R M, 1994. Effects of fine grinding on flotation performance: distinguishing size from other effects, in Proceedings Fifth Mill Operators Conference, pp 263-270 (The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy: Melbourne). Frew, J A, Smart, R and Manlapig, E V, 1994. Effects of fine grinding on flotation performance: generic statements, in Proceedings Fifth Mill Operators Conference, pp 245-250 (The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy: Melbourne). Gao, M and Weller, K R, 1993. Review of alternative technologies for fine grinding, AMIRA Project P336, Report P336/20, November. Grano, S, Weedon, D, Akroyd, T and Wiseman, D, 2004. Application of a property based flotation model in circuit, in Proceedings Metallurgical Plant Design and Operating Strategies, pp 299-317 (The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy: Melbourne). Greet, C J and Steinier, P, 2004. Grinding The primary conditioner, in Proceedings Metallurgical Plant Design and Operating Strategies, pp 319-336 (The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy: Melbourne). Holder, R K, 1994. Improvements in copper and silver flotation at Hellyer using high energy conditioning, in Proceedings Fifth Mill Operators Conference, pp 153-159 (The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy: Melbourne). Taggart, A F, 1927. Handbook of Mineral Dressing, pp 12-92 12-97 (John Wiley and Sons: New York). Young, M F and Gao, M, 2000. Performance of the IsaMills in the George Fisher flowsheet, in Proceedings AusIMM Seventh Mill Operators Conference, pp 75-81 (The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy: Melbourne). Young, M F, Pease J D and Fisher, K S, 2000. The installation of the George Fisher flowsheet in the Mount Isa lead/zinc concentrator, in Proceedings Seventh Mill Operators Conference, 157-163 (The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy: Melbourne).
CONCLUSIONS
Contrary to common perception, fines flotation is quite simple and can achieve very high recoveries. It does not require special flotation cells or exotic reagents or long residence times. It requires firstly an understanding of the size-by-size liberation characteristics of the ore, then designing a staged grinding and flotation circuit to suit. Attention to surface chemistry, water chemistry, classification and materials handling is important. The ability to design cheap effective circuits for fines recovery has been enabled by the introduction of high intensity stirred mills using inert media. The clean mineral surfaces can transform flotation performance of fines compared with conventional grinding with steel media. The development of large scale units like the 2.6 MW IsaMill, efficiently producing liberated particles with clean surfaces in narrow size distributions without the need for cycloning has provided a powerful new tool for circuit design.
912