Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
edited version that appeared in print. The original pagination has been maintained, despite the resulting odd page breaks, for ease of scholarly citation. However, scholars quoting this article should use the print version or give the URL.]
Journal of the Adventist Theological Society, 7/1 (Spring 1996): 81-106. Article copyright 1996 by Martin T. Prbstle.
Introduction Daniel 8:11-12 is considered one of the most difficult texts in the book of Daniel.1 It has puzzled scholars because of its intricate syntactic and semantic problems, which in turn have provoked a number of proposals for solving this Gordian knot. Some scholars have tried to make sense out of the traditional divisions of the Masoretic Text (MT) according to its accent system.2 Others demarcate sentences differently than the Massoretes, leaving the consonantal text with its word divisions untouched.3 Many scholars, however, suggest textual emendations,4 which in one case are seven for vss. 11 and 12.5 A fundamental question, then, is whether and to what extent the MT of Daniel 8:11-12 is capable of explanation in linguistic and structural terms.6 The purpose of this study is (a) to take a fresh look at the syntactic problems of the MT of Daniel 8:11-12, (b) to propose some solutions, if possible, and (c) finally to outline a syntactic working structure of vss. 9-12 on which basis further investigations can be undertaken.7 The MT provides the basis for this study. Our analysis follows a bottom-up process, that is, the study of syntax will precede the study of syntactic structure and the study of semantics, because both structure and semantics are higher in the linguistic hierarchy than syntax.8 This study does not attempt to investigate the semantic level, which is reserved for future study. It may be helpful to present at the outset a preliminary sen-
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106