Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Haidir Afesina Wirania Swasty Chairunnisa Mirhelina F X Kresna Paska Aqsa Adhiperwira Fajar Liem
throat share
Soft Drink
Carbonated water
Concentrate Producers,
sweetened
flavored
bottlers,
Soft Drink
retail channels,
concentrates
suppliers
CP
Bottlers
Bottlers
Business Process
Concentrate Producers
Business Process
Purchased concentrate Added carbonated water and high fructose corn syrup Bottled or canned the CSD Delivered it to customer accounts
Producer blended raw material ingredients Packaged it in plastic canisters Shipped it to the bottler
Supplier
Supplier
Packaging
$3.4 billion in cans $1.3 billion in plastic bottles $0.6 billion in glass $1.1 billion in sugar and high fructose corn syrup $1.0 billion in artificial
Caramel coloring Phosphoric and / or citric acid Natural flavors and caffeine
Sweeteners
Retail Channels
Food stores (35%)
Fountain outlets (23%) Vending Machines
(14%)
1980
1990
2000
Issues
Saturated
market
Healthy Huge
issues
Highly
Business Strategy
Single product strategy flagship brand Diversified products acquisition Niche strategy targeted geographic area
adult
teen
teen
http://www.economywatch.com/in-the-news/infographic-the-cola-wars.17-11.html
44.1
31.4
14.7
Industry 1970-2000: average growth 3 % (exhibit 1) $60-billion industry in US Widely available and conveniently packaged. Became a part of their life style in US and worldwide huge potential market Highly competitive
Industry analysis
Threat of new entrants:
Low switching costs. Huge number of suppliers. Maintaining the quality and flexibility of supply chain High entry costs High risk for entrants due to diversified nature Government Policy regulations. Existing Loyal customer base. Acquisition of major bottling units by existing firms, increases the entry barriers.
Threat of substitutes:
Non-CSD drinks Threat of saturation of consumption in US market thereby leading to increase in the consumption of non-Cola beverages.
Business Comparation
Concentrate Business Little capital investment Bottling Business Large capital Investment
Short line of procurement & Distribution Long line of Procurement & Distribution Strong position in determining the price of their product Less favorable position regarding for pricing on their product
Exhibit 5 Cost of sale is more in bottler the differences in added value between CPs and bottlers in a slowing market, the bottlers faced increasing price pressure while CPs could continue raising their prices. As the price of the concentrate rose, bottlers could not react in the same way and increase price of the final product as they were squeezed by other suppliers of different fruit drinks and other beverages. All of these factors contributed to lower returns in bottling business
How has the competition between Coke and Pepsi affected the industrys profits?
aggressive entry of PepsiCo into the food business thus increasing their consumer base as well as the industry 's Innovation in new product category / product line extension
Higher retail prices for alternative beverages meant that margins for the franchiser, bottler and distributor were consistently higher than on CSDs.
Can Coke and Pepsi sustain their profits in the wake of flattening demand and the growing popularity of non carbonated drinks?
Both companies predicted that future increases in market share would come from beverages other than CSDs
a strong brand identification; huge investments in advertising, customer service and trademark itself stable consumption levels and profit sustainability in future
Both companies predicted that future increases in market share would come from beverages other than CSDs To increase sales, they tried to make their products more affordable through measures such as refundable glass packaging (instead of plastic) and cheaper 6.5 ounce bottles The cola wars are going to be played now across a lot of different battlefields
Thanks !