Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Biostatistics
IQ of the Students
One-Sample Statistics Std. Std. Error N Mean Deviation Mean 10 57.900 29.33125 9.27536 0
One-Sample Test Test Value = 100 Mean Sig. (2- Differenc df tailed) e 9 .000 57.90000 95% Confidence Interval of the Difference Lower Upper 36.9177 78.8823
IQ of the Students
t 6.242
Ho: There is no significant difference in the mean IQ of EAC students as compared to the standard value Ha: There is a significant difference in the mean IQ of EAC students as compared to the standard value t(9)=- 6.242, p=.000<.05, very significant Decision: Reject the null hypothesis Conclusion: There is a significant difference in the mean IQ of EAC students as compared to the standard value
Problem 2A T test for paired samples Paired Samples Statistics Std. Std. Error Mean N Deviation Mean Pair Height Before 146.20 10 32.56720 10.29865 1 the Program 00 Height After the 158.00 10 30.41929 9.61942 Program 00
Paired Samples Correlations Correlati N on Sig. Pair Height Before the Program & 1 32.56720 10.2986 1 Height After the Program 0 5 1 30.41929 9.61942 0
Paired Samples Test Paired Differences Std. Std. Deviatio Error n Mean 2.32 95% Confidence Interval of the Difference Lower Upper t Sig. (2d tailed f ) .001
Mean Pai Height r 1 Before the Progra mHeight After the Progra m
- 7.34544 11.8000 0
Ho: There is no significant difference in the Height of the subjects before and after the program Ha: There is a significant difference in the Height of the subjects before and after the program t(9)= -5.080, p=.001>.05, very significant Decision: reject Ho Conclusion: There is a significant difference in the Height of the subjects before and after the program
Problem 2B Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test Ranks N Height After the Program - Height Before the Program Mean Rank .00 Sum of Ranks .00 55.00
Negative 0a Ranks Positive 10b 5.50 Ranks Ties 0c Total 10 a. Height After the Program < Height Before the Program b. Height After the Program > Height Before the Program c. Height After the Program = Height Before the Program
Z Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) a. Based on positive ranks. b. Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test
Ho: There is no significant difference in the Height of the subjects before and after the program Ha: There is a significant difference in the Height of the subjects before and after the program Z(10) = -2.805, p=0.005>.05, very significant Decision: reject Ho Conclusion: There is a significant difference in the Height of the subjects before and after the program.
IQ
Std. Std. Error N Mean Deviation Mean 5 67.600 27.26353 12.19262 00 5 48.200 30.93865 13.83618 00
Sig.
df 8
t-test for Equality of Means 95% Confidence Interval of the Difference Sig. Std. (2Mean Error tailed Differenc Differenc ) e e Lower Upper .324 19.40000 18.44180 - 61.9268 23.1268 7 7
IQ Equal . . 1.05 variance 012 915 2 s assume d Equal variance s not assume d
1.05 7.87 2 5
- 62.0442 23.2442 8 8
Ho: There is no significant difference in the IQ of male and female Ha: There is a significant difference in the IQ of male and female
t(8)=1.052, p=.324>.05, ns Decision: Do not reject Ho Conclusion: There is no significant difference in the IQ of male and female. Problem 3B Mann Whitney U Ranks Mean N Rank 5 6.40 5 4.60 10
IQ
Test Statisticsa IQ Mann-Whitney U 8.000 Wilcoxon W 23.000 Z -.940 Asymp. Sig. (2.347 tailed) Exact Sig. [2*1(tailed Sig.)] .421a a. Not Corrected for ties. b. Grouping Variable: gender Ho: There is no significant difference in the IQ of male and female Ha: There is a significant difference in the IQ of male and female MW(10)=8.000, p=0.347>0.05, ns
Decision: Do not reject Ho Conclusion: There is no significant difference in the IQ of male and female.
IQ 96 32 56 42 95 89 75 46 12 36
Height Before (in Height After (in Gend cm) cm) er IQ 186 196 0 146 175 1 120 132 1 101 118 0 125 131 1 163 175 0 125 136 0 198 201 1 175 180 1 123 136 0
96 32 56 42 95 89 75 46 12 36