Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Lesson 6
Parties - the legal entities involved Offer - business proposal Further information additional information concerning the offer
Counter-offer - modification of the original business proposal Consideration - something of value given in exchange for something else of value Acceptance - agreeing to the terms of the offer thereby finalizing the deal
Contract law applies to business deals of all sizes from ordering a pizza to buying a commercial property. Imagine you are a legal party in one of the transactions on the next slide =======>
Imagine you are buying a pizza? Imagine you are purchasing a piece of commercial property.
What are the elements?
A contract must be entered for "legel purpose" e.g. a contract to produce and distribute illegal drugs or firearms is not a binding contract.
There must be a "mutuality of obligation" so both parties must understand and assent to what is in the contract. The offer and acceptance of the terms must be clear and definite and all essential terms must be agreed upon by both parties.
An offer is an indication by one person to another of their willingness to enter into a contract with that person on certain terms. An "invitation to treat" is merely an invitation for another party to enter into negotiations. For example, if you have a retail shop, opening your shop is an invitation for people to enter and consider your goods. Accepting that invitation to treat does not form a legally binding contract. On the other hand, once an offer is accepted a contract is formed.
Acceptance is the offeree's voluntary, communicated agreement or assent to the terms and conditions of the offer. Assent is some act or promise of agreement. A simple example of an assent might be your friend saying, "I agree to buy your black leather jacket for 1,000."
or insane
A contract's subject matter must be certain. e.g. Contract to buy 1,000 coffee cups from OTTO The term "1,000 coffee cups"', quantity is certain but not item. It is not expressly implied what type of coffee cups the purchaser wishes to purchase. And if the purchaser tries to sue OTTO for not providing a specific type of coffee cup the courts can void the contract on this basis.
However if the purchaser tries to sue OTTO for not providing a specific type of coffee cup that both OTTO and the purchaser were in negotiation over and there were specific facts e.g. the purchaser requires the cups for wedding catering, the courts can ascertain that there are certain implied terms e.g. that the parties were negotiating only for OTTO's wedding range and so validate the contract on this basis.