IN THE MEDIA
REFLECTAREA DIVERSITII
N PRES
Chiinu 2005
REFLECTING DIVERSITY
IN THE MEDIA
Final Monitoring Report
MARCH 2004 MAY 2005
CONTENTS
Executive summary ............................................................................... 5
1. Introduction ...................................................................................... 7
2. Monitoring methodology ................................................................. 10
3. Background
3.1. Historical context ............................................................... 12
3.2. Demographics .................................................................... 13
4. General trends and paper specics
4.1. Key political,economic, other developments covered ........... 15
4.2. Coverage trends ................................................................. 16
4.3. Paper specics ..................................................................... 17
5. Nature of coverage
5.1. Article totals ...................................................................... 20
5.2. Story prominence, length and genre ................................. 22
5.3. Story focus, event importance and location ..................... 24
5.4. Representing the spectrum
(social groups, nationalities, gender-bending) ................... 25
5.5. Issues highlighted or marginalized, coverage tone ............. 28
6. True multiculturalism and diversity? .............................................. 34
7. Recommendations ............................................................................. 38
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The monitoring of ve government-funded newspapers from Chisinau,
Comrat and Tiraspol was carried out in the framework of the project
Networking for Diversity in March 2004 May 2005. Coverage of interregional and inter-ethnic relations in the following newspapers was studied:
Nezavisimaia Moldova and Moldova suverana (Chisinau), Pridnestrovie
and Adevarul nistrean (Tiraspol), as well as Vesti Gagauzii (Comrat). The
purpose was to establish to what extent various facets of these issues were
highlighted, and whether there were signicant variations across these
publications in the way who, what and how was represented in the
stories. Relevant articles were studied to establish their prominence (page
placement) in the newspaper, length, genre, focus, signicance and location
of the event covered, ethnic groups specied, as well as actors, their voice,
role, and the tone of coverage of actors activity.
Throughout the monitoring period the following general trends were
observed in the coverage of inter-ethnic and inter-regional relations by the
ve monitored newspapers:
Relevant issues enjoyed high prominence, with a third of the articles
published on the front page;
Throughout the analyzed period the coverage of inter-regional relations
by far exceeded that of inter-ethnic relations;
Straightforward news stories predominated in the coverage of relevant
issues, and another signicant group was analyses/commentaries;
Short stories made up more than half of the articles;
Stories were predominantly framed around non-conict everyday
events;
One-source stories were an absolute majority;
Authorities representatives predominated both as news sources and as
story actors;
For the majority of the monitored newspapers, governmental issues
(i.e. activities of various public institutions, elections, or implementation
of various legal acts) were the most frequent issues covered;
REFLECTING
1. INTRODUCTION
What is journalism for? In the modern media-savvy world most literate
adults will have an opinion about it. Some would say journalists role is
that of detached observer of events. Others would insist that they should
be activist participants in major developments. There are also those who
would be happy to see journalists simply as entertainers. The priorities of
the media, public opinion and policy makers interact in complex ways and
have multi-directional eects1. Many would even say that, in one way or
another, the news media set the public agendas2.
However, few are satised with the way this works. Members of our
profession have been accused of being overly-simplistic, reactive, and of
over-playing conict and violence. What is more, in ethnically diverse
communities, the media are often said to reinforce the existing dierences.
They can degenerate spirals of communication and in this way amplify
communal division3. On the other hand, the news media can also serve
as a condence-building tool. By covering a wide spectrum of voices, by
increasing the range of sources and analyzing the agendas of people who
do not belong to the elites, they can contribute to conict resolution and
promote multiculturalism and diversity.
In conditions when Moldovan media continue to depend on various
forms of sponsorship for survival and journalists largely remain divided
along political, linguistic and even geographical lines, there is a pressing
need for activities aimed at bringing them together and enhancing their
critical role as a fourth estate.
The project titled Networking for Diversity was administered by the
Independent Journalism Center (IJC) from January 2004 to June 2005.
1.McQuails Mass Communication Theory. McQuail, Denis. Sage Publications, 2000, p. 456.
2. Agenda-setting theory is based on the premise that the media has the ability to lter and shape the
reality in such a way so as to make the public perceive certain issues as more important than others.
3. The media election. Coverage of the 2003 Northern Ireland Assembly poll. Wilson, Robin and Fawcett,
Liz. Democratic Dialogue. http://www.democraticdialogue.org , January 2004, p. 6.
REFLECTING
2. MONITORING METHODOLOGY
Media monitoring was carried out in March 2004 May 2005 by a
research team composed of Dr. Natalia Angheli-Zaicenco (methodology
and data analysis), Diana Deres, Irina Gontea and Natalia Girleanu
(coders). Prof. Dr. hab. Constantin Marin of Moldova State University and
Dr. Snjezana Milivojevic from the University of Belgrade (Serbia) served
as consultants on the project.
The team looked at the way the mainstream national and regional
newspapers covered the following issues:
relations between three conventional regions Chisinau, Transnistria,
and Gagauzia;
relations between dierent ethnic groups inside the respective regions.
The purpose was to establish to what extent various facets of inter-ethnic
and inter-regional relations were highlighted, which themes were given
prominence, and to determine whether there were signicant variations
across the three regions in who, what and how received coverage.
The following research hypothesis has been advanced:
the coverage of inter-ethnic and inter-regional relations is sporadic;
it lacks variety and depth;
as a consequence, it fails to promote the principles of diversity and
multiculturalism.
Five mainstream newspapers from Chisinau, Transnistria and Gagauzia
were selected for analysis, i.e.:
Nezavisimaia Moldova Russian-language, Chisinau, print run ca.
14,300 copies
Moldova suverana Romanian-language, Chisinau, print run ca.
15,000 copies
5. Despite such a marked dierence in their print runs, both Pridnestrovie and Adevarul nistrean have the
Transnistrian presidency and parliament as founders. Russian remains the most frequently used language,
even though the equality of Russian, Ukrainian and Moldovan (Romanian) languages is proclaimed in
Transnistrian constitution. Moldovan (Romanian)-language media are in demand largely in Moldovan
(Romanian)-language villages and a few educational establishments throughout the region.
6. In May-June 2005, the Moldovan government ocially withdrew as the founder of Nezavisimaia
Moldova and Moldova suverana. No immediate changes in the format or content of the respective
papers ensued.
7. Since Adevarul nistrean comes out only once a week, every issue of this publication was analyzed.
3. BACKGROUND
3.1 Historical context
Moldovas emancipation from the Soviet rule brought about the
revival of the national awareness of ethnic Moldovans. As part of
this movement, a Law on the Functioning of Languages on the Territory
of Moldovan Soviet Socialist Republic (RSSM) was adopted in 1989.
Under the law, Moldovan (Romanian) gained the status of the official
language, and Russian was declared the language of communication
among nations 8. While raising the status of Moldovan (Romanian),
the law also stipulated the use of Ukrainian, Bulgarian, Hebrew,
Yiddish, Roma languages, etc. to meet the needs of various ethnic
groups living in Moldova.9 The law also stipulated the use of the
Latin alphabet for Moldovan (Romanian).
However, the drive for the revival of Moldovan culture and language,
and especially the adoption of the language law, was perceived as a threat
by some representatives of ethnic minorities. Their strongest fear was
that Moldova would eventually reunite with neighboring Romania (of
which it was part before 1940). Fierce protests ensued in the region east
of the river Dniester, which was populated largely by Ukrainians and
Russians. Thus, the self-proclaimed Moldovan Trans-Dniestrian Republic
(Transnistria) was created in September 1990. The 1991 referendum to
preserve the Soviet Union, boycotted in most of Moldova, was widely
hailed here. The Transnistrian parliament abolished the 1989 language
law and reintroduced the use of the Cyrillic alphabet for the Moldovan
language. The regions constitution declares Moldovan, Russian and
Ukrainian as the regions ocial languages.10 Relations between central
authorities and Transnistrian separatists reached a nadir in late 1991, and
several hundred lives were lost in ghting over the next seven months.
8. Article 3 of the Law on the Functioning of Languages on the Territory of RSSM .
9. Article 4 of the Law on the Functioning of Languages on the Territory of RSSM.
10. Article 12 of the Constitution of the Moldovan Trans-Dniestrian Republic.
The situation has remained tense, and years of negotiations between the
central authorities and Transnistrian leaders brokered by the OSCE have
not resulted in any signicant breakthrough.
In the south of Moldova, the fears of ethnic Gagauz (a Christian
Orthodox Turkic people) of losing their rights as a result of Moldovas
independence were allayed when the autonomous region of Gagauz
Yeri (Gagauzia) was created. The 1994 Law on the Special Legal Status of
Gagauz Yeri gave them the right to independently settle issues relating
to the political, economic and cultural development of the region.
Under the law, the ocial languages of Gagauz-Yeri are Moldovan
(Romanian), Gagauz and Russian. However, the predominant means
of communication in the region are Russian and Gagauz. Gagauzia has
its own parliament, while the regions governor (baskan) is a member of
the Moldovan Cabinet.
3.2 Demographics
According to preliminary data of the 2004 census, the population of
Moldova (without Transnistria) comprises 3,388,071 people. Moldovans
(and Romanians) are the largest ethnic group making up 78.2%. They
are followed by Ukrainians - 8.4%, Russians - 5.8%, Gagauz - 4.4%,
Bulgarians - 1.9%. Representatives of other ethnic groups number
1.3%.11
According to the census, 155,587 persons lived in Gagauzia in 2004.
The ethnic composition of the region was as follows: Moldovans 4.6%,
Ukrainians 3%, Russians 3.7%, Gagauz 82.6%, Bulgarians 5.1%,
and representatives of other nationalities - 0.9%.12
11. Recensamintul 2004. (2004 population census). Biroul national de Statistica al Republicii Moldova
(National Statistics Bureau of Moldova). http://www.statistica.md/recensamint.php
12. Ibid.
13. .
(Preliminary results of census in Transnistria have been announced). .
. http://www.narodru.ru/news3447.html , 09 June 2005
4. GENERAL TRENDS
AND PAPER SPECIFICS
4.1 Key political, economic and other developments covered
The period under analysis was marked by a variety of regional, national
and international events which had an impact on the coverage of relevant
issues in the ve monitored newspapers.
In the summer and early autumn of 2004, tensions between central
Moldovan authorities and Transnistrian leaders grew signicantly. Six
Romanian-language schools were closed down by the Transnistrian
administration in late July, and the Tighina (Bendery) segment of the
Moldovan railway was taken over by the local law-enforcement ocers. As a
result, negotiations on the future status of Transnistria were suspended, and
President Vladimir Voronin imposed economic sanctions against the region.
In September 2004, Dinu Mija, a cameraman of Moldovan public television,
was arrested by Transnistrian authorities and spent one week in a local jail.
The crisis has received ample coverage in most of the monitored papers.
In autumn 2004, the Moldovan parliament passed a law on privatization
in Transnistria which was severely criticized by the regions authorities.
Instead, Transnistrian leaders launched the idea to hold a referendum on
formal independence from Moldova (by June 2005, the referendum had
not been organized).
Tensions started to subside in late autumn of 2004, and OSCEmediated talks between authorities in Chisinau and Tiraspol resumed.
After months of protests, students of Romanian-language Transnistrian
schools returned to the classrooms. Nevertheless, by the end of the year the
Transnistrian authorities created a new political movement Respublica
aimed at strengthening the regions statehood.
In January March 2005, the coverage in the monitored papers was
largely dominated by the campaign for parliamentary elections in Moldova
with the ocial stance on the problem). The coverage of relevant events
in both newspapers was overwhelmingly concise, and the predominant
journalistic genre was straightforward news. Since Nezavisimaia Moldova
and Moldova suverana both have a nationwide circulation, it is not surprising
that events of national importance predominated.
A similar coverage trend was observed in Pridnestrovie. Here aspects of
relations between Transnistrian and Moldovan authorities were the major
highlight, and the stance of the regions authorities on relevant issues was
always perceived as the right one. On the other hand, Moldovan policies
towards Transnistria, and especially the agenda promoted by President
Vladimir Voronin, came under close scrutiny and severe criticism. The
keynote message throughout the monitoring period was that Moldovan
leaders are inveterate liars. Therefore, their initiatives on resolving
the Transnistrian dispute cannot be trusted. Similarly, Pridnestrovie
frequently criticized the position of the Western nations and international
organizations on the Transnistrian issue. Since Moldovan leaders, and
especially Moldovan President Vladimir Voronin, were among the most
frequent story actors, it is not surprising that the paper had the largest ratio
of negative evaluations of actors activities and the largest number of stories
in which relevant events were framed around verbal conicts. Analysis
was the most favorite news genre used to cover aspects of relations with
central Chisinau authorities, and Pridnestrovie carried the largest ratio
of analysis/commentaries among the monitored papers. However, in the
coverage of other issues analyses were not that frequent.
Adevarul nistrean and Vesti Gagauzii devoted far more attention to
highlighting various cultural issues, and in this way they diered from the
other monitored papers. Traditions, history, and development of ethnic
languages featured prominently in both papers, sometimes even in the
shape of scientic research articles.
For Adevarul nistrean, aspects of the life of ethnic Moldovans in the
region were of primary interest. The key message in most articles was that
5. NATURE OF COVERAGE
5.1 Article totals
Over the 15-month monitoring period 3,057 articles highlighting
aspects of inter-regional and inter-ethnic relations were identied. Vesti
Gagauzii carried the largest number of stories on the issues analyzed (744),
whereas the number of relevant materials in other monitored newspapers
ranged between 570 and 598 (see the percentage ratio in diagram 1):
Diagram1 1
Diagram
23%
19%
23%
19%
19%
Moldova suverana
Pridnestrovie
20%
Adevarul nistrean
Throughout this period, the ve newspapers
focused mainly on
19%
Gagauzii
relations among the three conventional Vesti
regions
(Transnistria, Gagauzia,
Diagram 2
19%As shown
and the rest of Moldova).
in diagram 2, the number of articles
on these30%
issues by far exceeded the number of stories on aspects of interethnic relations:
Inter-regional relations
Diagram
2
Inter-ethnic relations
Diagram 2
30%
70%
Inter-regional relations
Inter-ethnic relations
Diagram 3
70%
300
250
200
150
Diagram 3
100
300
50
250
0
200
04
04
04
04
05
05
05
05
Diagram 1
23%
19%
19%
IN THE MEDIA 21
19%
The coverage of issues within the scope of the present research was
largely reactive. It appeared to be driven mainly by political developments
in the country. Thus, the number Diagram
of relevant
articles increased at the time
2
of the Romanian-language
schools crisis in August-October 2004, in the
30%
run-up to the general and presidential Inter-regional
elections ofrelations
March-April 2005, and
relations
following the new initiatives on ways toInter-ethnic
resolve the
Transnistrian stalemate
in May 2005 (cf. data in diagram70%
3):
Diagram 3
Diagram 3
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
ar
'0
4
A
r'
04
M
ay
4
'0
Ju
ne
'0
4
Ju
ly
'0
4
A
g'
04
p
Se
t'
04
O
ct
'0
4
N
ov
'0
4
D
ec
'0
4
Ja
n'
05
F
eb
'0
5
M
ar
'0
5
A
r'
05
M
ay
'0
By comparison, the smallest number of front-page articles on interregional and inter-ethnic relations was carried by Adevarul nistrean
and Vesti Gagauzii the papers that lean more towards the coverage of
cultural developments:
Even though a fairly large number of stories on aspects of interethnic or inter-regional relations was registered during the monitoring
period, these were largely short or medium-length articles.15 As shown
in diagram 5, all five monitored newspapers tended towards a concise
coverage of relevant issues rather than detailed, in-depth reporting:
15. An article, which was one-page long or longer, was considered as very long; an article, which was
between half-page and full page in length as long; an article, which was between a quarter of page
and half a page in length as medium-length; an article, which was less than a quarter of a page as
short;.
The key message in Vesti Gagauzii during the election campaign was
that it was the Communists who had ensured a true language, ethnic
and cultural diversity in Moldova.20 Moldova suverana maintained the
same note in its coverage. According to the paper, it was the Communist
governance that had created instruments for harmonious development
of all ethnicities in Moldova. 21
Nevertheless, throughout the 15-month monitoring period, the
dominating story-telling frame was non-conflict everyday events.
48.3% of stories in the five newspapers were built around it. Another
commonly-used frame was festivities/important dates (22.8%).
The ratio of stories covering verbal conflicts was significantly lower
- they comprised 15.4% of relevant articles in the five monitored
newspapers.
A similar non-conict reporting trend was observed in the coverage of
the activities of specic story actors. In all the papers analyzed the tone was
predominantly neutral (see diagram 19):
20.
.(The call of the Comrat bureau of the Socialist party to all
16 July 2004, p. 1.
23. ,
(Chisinau has imposed an economic blockade against Eastern regions, but it is the
Moldovan enterprises that suer). Pridnestrovie. 24 August 2004, p. 1.
24. Smirnov a declarat razboi scolilor inca in 1991. (Smirnov declared the war on schools back in
1991). Moldova suverana. 17 August, 2004, p. 2.
25. (The
reintegration minister qualies the actions of the Transnistrian authorities as barbaric). Nezavisimaia
Moldova. 16 July 2004, p. 2.
26. (I am going home). Nezavisimaia Moldova. 23 July 2004, p. 6.
27. Obstimea nistreana e ingrijorata de escaladarea incordarii. (Transnistrian public is concerned about
mounting tensions). Adevarul nistrean. 7 August, 2004, p. 2.
6. TRUE MULTICULTURALISM
AND DIVERSITY?
The major pitfall of Moldovan media, i.e. their general obsession with
the comings and goings of political elites, has translated into a skewed
coverage of inter-regional and inter-ethnic relations by the monitored
newspapers:
Reporting about these issues was largely driven by political developments,
and authorities were the major newsmakers.
Political stories predominated by receiving front-page coverage, and it
was the perspective of the authorities on aspects of inter-ethnic and
inter-regional relations that was largely presented.
The stories were predominantly framed around the us-themdichotomy,
and the monitored papers unswervingly lined up behind the authorities
of the respective regions.
The coverage was predominantly reactive there were very few cases
when the monitored papers brought up issues to public attention, raised
topics for public debate or demanded changes in relevant public policies.
Issues aecting everyday life of average citizens were marginalized, and
their opinions on socially-signicant problems were rarely solicited.
Despite their geographical and, sometimes, even ideological
dierences, all the analyzed papers appear to adhere to similar journalism
standards. Financial support from the public coers seems to trigger a tacit
obligation to provide priority coverage of the activities of top political
gures rather than generate stories that would be of real interest to citizens.
Under the circumstances, the watchdog role of these media outlets was
substantially reduced.
Throughout the monitoring period even Adevarul nistrean and Vesti
Gagauzii, which proclaim the goal of preserving the language and culture
of ethnic Moldovans and Gagauz on their mastheads, appeared to take
their cues largely from the authorities.
cooperate administered by reporters from the Chisinau-based, privatelyowned Timpul newspaper.30 Vesti Gagauzii and Adevarul nistrean also carried
reports about successful, cross-regional projects of non-governmental
organizations.31
Nevertheless, these examples were few and far between. Moreover,
the predominantly neutral coverage of relevant issues in the monitored
papers did not mean that problems were analyzed in a comprehensive and
in-depth manner or that the perspective of the other side was oered.
Therefore, a claim can be made that throughout the monitoring period
the analyzed newspapers did not contribute to a better understanding
among the residents of the three conventional regions and generally failed
to promote diversity and multiculturalism.
7. RECOMMENDATIONS
Examples provided in the present study highlight the major challenges
facing the ve monitored media outlets. Priority given to the top political
dogs at the expense of other societal voices and reducing complex issues to
an us-them confrontation signicantly hamper the ability of the media to
inform and engage the public in an eective manner.
A dierent approach to news reporting might prove useful one that
focuses on complexity and seeks common ground. This kind of journalism
covers a wide spectrum of voices in any conict instead of simply reducing
the number of parties to two. It increases the range of sources and analyses
the agendas of people who do not belong to the elites. Along with providing
facts, it also discusses the process by which some facts are selected and
others are suppressed.
Among other terms, this kind of journalism is known as constructive
reporting. The key dierences between the traditional and constructive
journalism frameworks are mapped in the table below:32
TRADITIONAL JOURNALISM
CONSTRUCTIVE JOURNALISM
Journalists role
Watchdog
Commentator
Independent of issues covered
Observer
Enabler
Communicator
Independent yet interdependent
In the boat
Debate
Dierence
Polemic
Dialogue
Common ground and dierence
Discussion
Style/Stories
32. Based on Peace journalism how to do it. McGoldrick, Annabel; Lynch, Jake. October 2000, p. 28.
Approach to reporting
Seeks simplicity
Explores complexity
Event-based reporting
Process-based reporting
Balance means covering both sides Balance means representing both
equally (quantity)
sides and perceptions (quality)
Approach to audiences
Newsroom sets the agenda
The public has a role
in setting the agenda
Leaders/experts know best
Ordinary people need
to be consulted
In fact, there is nothing dramatically new in this approach. It is based on
traditional journalistic values, and it sets the goal of holding the powers that
be accountable. It is, however, far less sensational and much more creative
and analytical than the journalism products that we regularly consume.
It does not mean that reporters are expected to get soft and conceal
violence and conict. Actually, this approach requires a signicant amount
of critical thinking, sound judgment, knowledge and style. This, obviously,
requires a considerable investment of time and eort on the part of
journalists.
A number of specic requirements for media professionals result from
this framework:
Be aware of own prejudices and stereotypes and make sure they do not
penetrate into the story;
Illuminate the story in detail from all sides;
Be careful to draw from diverse sources; do not overuse elites as
sources, but make use of dierent experts;
Oer sensible and well-written reports about ordinary people;
Supply more background reports;
REFLECTAREA DIVERSITII
N PRES
RAPORT FINAL AL MONITORIZRII
MARTIE 2004MAI 2005
CUPRINS
Raport sumar ....................................................................................... 43
1. Introducere ....................................................................................... 45
2. Metodologia monitorizrii .............................................................. 48
3. Fundal
3.1. Contextul istoric ............................................................... 50
3.2. Demograa ....................................................................... 51
4. Tendine generale i specicul ecrui ziar
4.1. Relatarea principalelor evenimente politice,
economice .a .............................................................. 53
4.2. Tendine n reectare ......................................................... 54
4.3. Specicul ziarelor n particular ............................................ 55
5. Caracterul reectrii problemelor analizate
5.1. Totalitatea articolelor ....................................................... 58
5.2. Amplasarea, volumul i genul articolelor ............................ 59
5.3. Accentele articolelor, importana i locul evenimentelor .. 61
5.4. Reprezentarea spectrului social
(grupuri sociale, naionaliti, gender) ........................ 63
5.5 Probleme de interes sporit sau
marginalizate, tonalitatea reectrii ............................ 67
6. Un adevrat multiculturalism i diversitate? ................................. 73
7. Recomandri .................................................................................... 76
RAPORT SUMAR
Monitorizarea a cinci ziare guvernamentale din Chiinu, Comrat
i Tiraspol s-a efectuat n cadrul proiectului Reflectarea diversitii n
mass-media, n perioada martie 2004 - mai 2005. Reflectarea relaiilor
interregionale i interetnice a fost studiat conform materialelor
din urmtoarele ziare: Nezavisimaia Moldova i Moldova suveran
(Chiinu), Pridnestrovie i Adevrul nistrean (Tiraspol), i Vesti Gagauzii
(Comrat). Scopul studiului: a) determinarea nivelului de elucidare a
acestor probleme; b) diferena de relatare a evenimentelor, personajelor
i aciunilor lor n ziarele amintite. Au fost studiate articole adecvate,
analizndu-se amplasarea lor n pagini, lungimea, genul i accentele
materialelor, semnificaia i aria geografic a evenimentelor reflectate,
personajele i grupurile etnice implicate, opinia i rolul lor n contextul
acelor evenimente; tonalitatea n care au fost descrise activitile lor.
n perioada monitorizri celor cinci ziare au fost observate urmtoarele
tendine generale n modul de reflectare a relaiilor interregionale i
interetnice:
Problemele corespunztoare s-au bucurat de atenie sporit, o treime
din articole fiind publicate pe prima pagin;
n perioada analizat reflectarea relaiilor interregionale a depit cu
mult pe cele interetnice;
n reflectarea problemelor relevante au predominat tirile clasice,
precum i analizele/comentariile;
Circa jumtate din materialele studiate au fost cuprinse n articole
scurte;
Subiectele fceau parte preponderent din categoria evenimentelor
cotidiene neconflictuale;
n majoritatea covritoare a articolelor era consultat o singur
surs;
n marea majoritate a articolelor reprezentanii autoritilor figurau ca
personaje sau n calitate de surs de informaie;
Activitatea diverselor instituii publice i de stat, alegerile sau
funcionarea legilor a fost frecvent reflectat n ziarele analizate;
1. INTRODUCERE
La ce servete jurnalismul? n lumea modern, contient de
mecanismele de funcionare a presei, aproape orice om citit i are opinia
sa asupra unui subiect. Cineva ar spune c rolul jurnalitilor este de a fi
observatori detaai ai evenimentelor. Alii ar insista c acetia trebuie s
fie participani activi la evenimentele importante. Mai sunt o categorie
de ceteni care i-ar dori ca ziaritii s nu fie dect simpli ageni de
divertisment. Prioritile presei, opiniei publice i ale clasei politice
interacioneaz complex i produc efecte pe mai multe direcii.1 Am
putea afirma c presa este n stare s fac schimbri de importan social
n agenda public.2
Totodat, puini sunt acei care se simt satisfcui de modul n care
funcioneaz aceste mecanisme. Unii reprezentani ai profesiei noastre au
fost acuzai de simplism, pasivitate i atenie exagerat situaiilor de conflict
i violenei. Mai mult ca att, se spune c presa adncete contradiciile
existente n comunitile caracterizate de o diversitate etnic. Aceasta
ar duce la obstrucionarea spirale de comunicare, ceea ce ar amplifica
dezbinrile deja existente n societate.3 n alt sens, presa ar putea contribui
la edificarea ncrederii reciproce ntre prile conflictuale. Prin lrgirea
spectrului de opinii, de surse i analiza activitii cetenilor simpli, presa
ar contribui la soluionarea conflictelor, la promovarea multiculturalismului
i diversitii.
n condiiile n care presa din Moldova continu s depind de diverse
forme de sponsorizare, iar jurnalitii sunt divizai pe criterii politice,
lingvistice i chiar geografice, este imperios necesar de a desfura activiti
ce ar avea drept scop apropierea i sporirea rolului lor, n calitate de puterea
a patra.
1. McQuails Mass Communication Theory. McQuail, Denis. Sage Publications, 2000, p. 456.
2. Teoria de stabilire a agendei se sprijin pe premisa c presa are capacitatea de a ltra i modela realitatea
astfel nct s determine publicul s perceap unele probleme ca ind mai importante dect altele.
3. The media election. Coverage of the 2003 Northern Ireland Assembly poll. (Alegeerea mass-media.
Reectarea alegerilor parlamentare din Irlanda de Nord din 2003). Wilson, Robin and Fawcett, Liz.
Democratic Dialogue. http://www.democraticdialogue.org , ianuarie 2004, p. 6.
2. METODOLOGIA MONITORIZRII
Monitorizarea presei a fost efectuat n perioada martie 2004 - mai
2005 de ctre o echip de cercetare compus din Dr. Natalia AngheliZaicenco (metodologia i analiza datelor), Diana Dere, Irina Gontea i
Natalia Grleanu (operatori). Consultani ai proiectului avndu-i pe Prof.
Dr. hab. Constantin Marin de la Universitatea de Stat din Moldova i Dr.
Snjezana Milivojevic de la Universitatea din Belgrad (Serbia).
Echipa a examinat modalitatea n care principalele ziare regionale i
naionale au reectat urmtoarele subiecte:
raportul dintre cele trei regiuni convenionale Chiinu, Transnistria
i Gguzia;
raportul dintre diverse grupuri etnice ce locuiesc n regiunile
respective.
Scopul monitorizrii a fost determinarea gradului de elucidare i
reectare a relaiilor interregionale i interetnice; cror teme li se acord
prioritate, diferena de relatare a evenimentelor, personajelor i activitilor
lor n ziarele din cele trei regiuni consemnate.
Pentru cercetare a fost lansat urmtoarea ipotez:
reectarea relaiilor interetnice i interregionale este sporadic;
reectarea duce lips de diversitate i profunzime;
drept consecin, nu se promoveaz principiile multiculturalismului.
Pentru examinare au fost selectate urmtoarele cinci ziare din Chiinu,
Transnistria i Gguzia:
Nezavisimaia Moldova de limb rus, Chiinu, tiraj cca. 14.300
exemplare
Moldova suveran de limb romn, Chiinu, tiraj cca. 15.000
exemplare
Pridnestrovie de limb rus, Tiraspol, tiraj cca. 3.100 exemplare
5. n ciuda acestei diferene substaniale de tiraj, att Pridnestrovie ct i Adevrul nistrean au fost fondate
de preedinia i parlamentul autoproclamat de la Tiraspol. Rusa este n continuare limba cea mai larg
folosit, dei constituia transnistrean proclam egalitatea limbilor rus, ucrainean i moldoveneasc
(romn). Presa de limb moldoveneasc (romn) este citit mai mult n satele moldoveneti (romneti),
ct i n unele instituii de nvmnt din regiune.
6. n lunile mai-iunie 2005 guvernul Moldovei a renunat n mod ocial la calitatea sa de fondator al
ziarelor Nezavisimaia Moldova i Moldova suveran, ns n perioada imediat urmtoare nu s-a nregistrat
nici o schimbare n formatul sau coninutul ziarelor respective.
7. Deoarece Adevrul nistrean apare doar o dat pe sptmn, a fost analizat ecare numr al acestui ziar.
3. FUNDAL
3.1 Contextul istoric
nclzirea climatului politic n fosta URSS n epoca gorbaciovist
(Perestroika) a permis fostelor republici unionale s-i reconstituie
trecutul i prezentul lor ca naiuni, ceea ce a adus dup sine renaterea
contiinei naionale a populaiei majoritare (moldovenii) i n RSSM. n
rezultatul acestei micri a fost adoptat Legea cu privire la funcionarea
limbilor pe teritoriul RSSM, votat la 31 august 1989. Conform acestei
legi, limba moldoveneasc (romn) a obinut statut de limb ocial,
iar limba rus a fost declarat limb de comunicare ntre naiuni.8
Sporind statutul limbii moldoveneti (romne), legea stipula n acelai
timp condiiile de aplicare a limbilor ucrainean, bulgar, ebraic, idi,
rrom etc. pentru satisfacerea necesitilor naional-culturale ale diverselor grupuri etnice care conlocuiesc n Moldova.9 Conform aceleiai
legi s-a trecut la alfabetul latin pentru scrisul n limba moldoveneasc
(romn).
ns micarea de renatere naional i mai cu seam adoptarea legii
privind funcionarea limbilor, au fost percepute ca o ameninare de
ctre unii reprezentani ai minoritilor naionale. Argumentul forte
ind eventualitatea reunicrii Moldovei cu Romnia (din care fcuse
parte pn la 1940). Aceasta a dus la proteste n regiunea din partea de
est a Nistrului regiune populat masiv de ucraineni i rui. Astfel, n
septembrie 1990, a fost creat autoproclamata Republic Moldoveneasc
Nistrean (Transnistria). Referendumul din 1991, pentru pstrarea
Uniunii Sovietice, boicotat n cea mai mare parte a Moldovei, a fost
primit cu mult entuziasm n Transnistria. Parlamentul transnistrean
anuleaz legea cu privire la funcionarea limbilor, adoptat n 1989, i
reintroduce alfabetul chirilic n cazul limbii moldoveneti. Constituia
autoproclamatei regiuni declar limbile moldoveneasc, rus i ucrainean
8. Articolul 3 al Legii cu privire la funcionarea limbilor pe teritoriul RSSM.
9. Articolul 4 al Legii cu privire la funcionarea limbilor pe teritoriul RSSM.
10. Articolul 12 al Constituiei Republicii Moldoveneti Nistrene.
3.2 Demograa
Conform rezultatelor preliminare ale recensmntului din 2004,
populaia Moldovei (fr Transnistria) reprezint 3.388.071 persoane.
Moldovenii (romnii) reprezint grupul etnic cel mai numeros, cu 78,2%.
Urmeaz ucrainenii 8,4%, ruii 5,8%, gguzii 4,4%, bulgarii 1,9%.
Reprezentanii altor etnii ocup 1,3% din total.11
Conform recensmntului, n 2004, n Gguzia locuiau 155.587
persoane. Componena etnic a regiunii era urmtoarea: moldoveni 4,6%,
ucraineni 3%, rui 3,7%, gguzi 82,6%, bulgari 5,1% i reprezentani
ai altor naionaliti 0,9%.12
11. Recensmntul 2004. Biroul naional de Statistic al Republicii Moldova.
http://www.statistica.md/recensamint.php
12. Ibidem.
4. TENDINE GENERALE
I SPECIFICUL FIECRUI ZIAR
4.1 Relatarea principalelor evenimente politice, economice .a
Perioada supus analizei a fost marcat de un ir de evenimente
regionale, naionale i internaionale, care au inuenat modul de reectare
a problemelor nominalizate n cele cinci ziare supuse monitorizrii.
n vara-toamna timpurie a anului 2004, tensiunile dintre autoritile
centrale moldovene i liderii transnistreni au sporit semnicativ. La
sfritul lunii iulie, administraia transnistrean a nchis ase coli
cu predare n limba romn, iar segmentul Tighina (Bender) al cii
ferate moldoveneti a fost acaparat i trecut sub jurisdicia organelor
de drept locale. n consecin, au fost suspendate negocierile privind
viitorul statut al Transnistriei, iar Preedintele Vladimir Voronin a
impus regiunii sanciuni economice. n septembrie 2004, Dinu Mija,
cameraman al televiziunii publice din R.Moldova, a fost arestat de ctre
autoritile separatiste, andu-se timp o sptmn ntr-o nchisoare
din regiune. Aceast criz a fost pe larg reectat de ctre majoritatea
ziarelor monitorizate.
n toamna lui 2004, parlamentul moldovean a adoptat Legea cu privire
la privatizare n Transnistria, care a fost aspru criticat de ctre autoritile
regiunii. Acestea din urm au lansat ideea unui referendum privind
separarea formal de R. Moldova (referendumul nu fusese nc organizat
pn n iulie 2005).
Tensiunile au nceput s slbeasc abia la sfritul toamnei 2004, iar
negocierile dintre autoritile de la Chiinu i Tiraspol, mediate de OSCE,
au fost reluate. Dup luni ntregi de proteste, elevii colilor cu predare
n limba romn din Transnistria au revenit n slile de clas. Cu toate
acestea, ctre sfritul anului, autoritile transnistrene au ninat o nou
micare politic, Respublika, care avea drept scop consolidarea statalitii
regiunii.
state. Relaiile dintre regiuni au fost privite mai mult prin prisma elitelor
politice de la Chiinu. Impasul transnistrean a fost problema dominant,
mesajul principal ind c liderii locali sunt nite criminali interesai n
pstrarea status quo al regiunii (aceast poziie corespunde ntocmai
poziiei ociale asupra problemei). Reectarea evenimentelor respective
n ambele ziare a fost concis i a predominat tirea clasic. Fiind dat
faptul c Nezavisimaia Moldova i Moldova suveran sunt difuzate la scar
naional, nu este deloc surprinztor c au predominat evenimentele de
importan naional.
Aceeai tendin a fost observat i n materialele ziarului
Pridnestrovie. n cazul acestei publicaii, relaiile dintre autoritile
transnistrene i cele moldovene au reprezentat punctul principal
de interes, iar poziia autoritilor din regiune asupra problemelor
respective n toate cazurile a fost perceput ca cea corect. Pe de alt
parte, politicile promovate de Moldova fa de Transnistria, i mai ales
de ctre preedintele Vladimir Voronin, au fost supuse unei examinri
minuioase i critici severe. Mesajul de baz n perioada monitorizrii a
fost c liderii moldoveni sunt nite mincinoi incorigibili i iniiativele
acestora n vederea soluionrii diferendului transnistrean nu trebuie
crezute. Similar, Pridnestrovie a criticat vehement poziia Occidentului
i a organismelor internaionale fa de problema transnistrean. Fiind
dat faptul c liderii moldoveni, i n special preedintele moldovean
Vladimir Voronin, erau printre personajele cel mai frecvent prezente n
articole, nu este surprinztor faptul c ziarul respectiv a avut proporia
cea mai mare de evaluri negative ale activitilor personajelor, ct
i numrul cel mai mare de articole n care evenimentele respective
erau prezentate n contextul unor conicte verbale. Analizele au
reprezentat genul de actualiti preferat pentru reectarea relaiilor cu
autoritile centrale de la Chiinu, Pridnestrovie avnd i proporia
cea mai mare de analize i comentarii printre ziarele monitorizate. Pe
de alt parte, n reectarea altor probleme, analizele nu au constituit
genul cel mai frecvent.
Adevrul nistrean i Vesti Gagauzii au acordat o atenie sporit actualizrii
5.CARACTERUL REFLECTRII
PROBLEMELOR ANALIZATE
5.1 Totalitatea articolelor
n perioada de monitorizare, ce a durat 15 luni, au fost selectate
3.057 articole ce tratau aspecte ale relaiilor interregionale i interetnice.
Vesti Gagauzii a avut cel mai mare numr de articole privind problemele
analizate (744), n timp ce n celelalte ziare supuse monitorizrii numrul
lor a variat ntre 570 i 598 (vezi raportul procentual n diagrama 1).
Diagrama 11
Diagrama 11
Diagrama 11
16.
(Consiliul de minitri al CE a fost informat despre escaladarea tensiunilor n
Transnistria). Nezavisimaia Moldova. 8 februarie 2005, p. 3.
17. : ,
. (Preedintele RMN: vom face totul s nu admitem ciocniri pe Nistru). Pridnestrovie. 26
ianuarie 2005, p. 1.
18. .(Lupul lup rmne chiar i n piele de oaie). Pridnestrovie.
18 ianuarie 2005, p. 2.
19. Moldova are o atitudine iresponsabil fa de cetenii ei. Adevrul nistrean. 29 ianuarie 2005, p. 2.
20.
. (Adresarea biroului central al Partidului Socialist din
Comrat ctre toi alegtorii din Moldova). Vesti Gagauzii. 8 februarie 2005, p. 1.
21. Noua generaie nu trebuie s e afectat de probleme lingvistice . Moldova suveran. 1 februarie 2005, p. 3.
24. Smirnov a declarat rzboi colilor nc n 1991. Moldova suveran. 17 august 2004, p. 2.
25.
(Ministrul Reintegrrii apreciaz aciunile autoritilor transnistrene ca pe o barbarie).
Nezavisimaia Moldova. 16 iulie 2004, p. 2.
26. (Plec n patrie). Nezavisimaia Moldova. 23 iulie 2004, p. 6.
27. Obtimea nistrean e ngrijorat de escaladarea ncordrii. Adevrul nistrean. 7 august 2004, p. 2.
6. UN ADEVRAT MULTICULTURALISM
I DIVERSITATE?
Problema cea mare a presei din R. Moldova, adic obsesia general
pe care o manifest aceasta pentru aciunile i micrile elitelor politice,
s-a transformat ntr-o reectare distorsionat a relaiilor interregionale i
interetnice pe paginile presei monitorizate:
Relatarea evenimentelor a fost motivat de obicei de evenimente
politice, autoritile ind centrul de atenie pentru pres.
Articolele politice au dominat primele pagini, ind prezentat n general
punctul de vedere al autoritilor asupra aspectelor ce in de relaiile
interregionale i interetnice.
Articolele au fost n mod predominant ncadrate n contextul dihotomiei
noi i ei, iar ziarele supuse monitorizrii s-au aliniat fr rezerve la
poziia autoritilor din regiunile respective.
Reectarea a fost predominant pasiv au fost foarte puine cazurile
cnd ziarele monitorizate s supus ateniei publicului anumite
probleme, s abordat teme pentru dezbateri publice sau s se cerut
modicri n politica de stat respectiv.
Problemele ce afecteaz viaa cotidian a cetenilor au fost
marginalizate, iar opinia lor asupra unor probleme cu semnicaie
social a fost solicitat foarte rar.
Dei aria geografic i ideologic a ziarelor analizate este divers,
toate par s respecte standarde jurnalistice asemntoare. S-ar prea
c dependena financiar de autoritile publice locale a mass-media
examinat impune o regul nescris de a da prioritate reflectrii
activitii elitelor politice n defavoarea problemelor cotidiene ale
ceteanului simplu. Ziarele monitorizate nu i-au ndeplinit rolul
de cine de paz al societii, insuficient fiind tratate problemele
din societate; n-au fost provocate dezbateri publice pe cele mai
controversate teme, nu s-au auzit apeluri la a influena politica de stat.
n general, nu s-a reuit promovarea diversitii i multiculturalismului
n societate.
7. RECOMANDRI
Exemplele oferite n acest studiu scot n eviden problemele
stringente cu care se confrunt cele cinci ziare monitorizate. Prioritatea
acordat personajelor politice de vrf n defavoarea ceteanului simplu,
problematicile complexe ind reduse la o confruntare de genul noi i ei,
duce la o paralizie a capacitii inerente a presei de a informa i angrena
ntr-o manier ecient publicul.
Ar putea util o alt abordare a reectrii noutilor o abordare ce sar concentra pe complexitate i ar cuta teren comun. Acest fel de jurnalism
cuprinde un spectru larg de opinii, oricare ar conictul, nelimitnd
numrul prilor aate n contradicie la numai dou. El de asemenea
sporete gama surselor de informaie i analizeaz interesele particulare ale
personajelor ce nu fac parte din elite. Pe lng consemnarea faptelor, acest
fel de jurnalism discut, de asemenea, i despre procedura de selectate ori
excludere a diverselor fapte i evenimente.
Acest fel de ziaristic este cunoscut i ca jurnalism constructiv.
Diferenele de baz dintre jurnalismul tradiional i cel constructiv sunt
prezentate n tabelul de mai jos:32
JURNALISM TRADIIONAL
JURNALISM CONSTRUCTIV
Cine de paz
Agent de abilitare
Comentator
Rolul jurnalistului
Independent de problematica
reectat
Observator
Dezbateri
Diferene
Polemici
Agent de comunicare
Stilul/Subiectele
Dialog
32. n baza Peace journalism how to do it. McGoldrick, Annabel; Lynch, Jake. October 2000, p. 28.
Metoda reportericeasc
Caut simplitate
Exploreaz complexitatea
Relatri n baza unor evenimente
Relatri n baza unor procese
Echilibrul nseamn reectarea
Echilibrul nseamn prezentarea
ambelor pri n mod egal
opiniilor ambelor pri
(cantitate)
(calitate)
Abordarea publicului
Redacia alege temele
2004 . 2005 .
.......................................................................................................... 81
1. ................................................................................................... 83
2. ............................................................... 86
3.
3.1. ......................................................... 88
3.2. ................................................. 89
4.
4.1. ,
............................................... 91
4.2. ................ 92
4.3. .................................................. 93
5.
5.1. ..................................................... 96
5.2. , .................................... 97
5.3. , ................... 100
5.4.
( , , ) ....................... 101
5.5. ,
, ..................... 105
6. ? .................. 111
7. ........................................................................................ 113
2004. 2005.
,
, .
: Moldova suveran
(), (),
(). ,
,
, , .
,
, , , ,
, , ,
, ,
.
:
;
.
.
, .
.
, ,
.
.
, .
(..
,
).
82
,
.
,
; ,
, .
, ..
;
.
, ,
.
,
, ,
, .
,
,
.
;
, ,
.
. ,
- .
, , .
,
.
1.
? ,
,
. ,
.
,
. , ,
. ,
, ,
.1 ,
.2
, .
,
,
. , ,
,
. ,
.3 ,
. ,
, ,
.
,
,
,
,
.
1. McQuails Mass Communication Theory. McQuail, Denis. Sage Publications, 2000, . 456.
2. (agenda-setting theory) ,
,
, .
3. The media election. Coverage of the 2003 Northern Ireland Assembly poll. ( . 2003 ). Wilson, Robin
Fawcett, Liz. Democratic Dialogue. http://www.democraticdialogue.org , 2004, . 6.
84
()
2004 . 2005 .
: ,
.
:
, ;
,
-;
,
,
(journalistic best practices)
.
,
(
) 150 .
,
.
.
,
,
;
,
.
,
, ..
,
.
85
,
.
,
; ,
.4
2.
2004 . 2005 .
- -
( ), ,
(). ,
()
.
,
:
, ;
.
,
,
,
, , .
:
,
,
, .
, , :
,
14.300 ;
Moldova suveran ,
15.000 ;
,
3.100 ;
87
A ()
, 1.300 5;
,
5.000 .
6,
.
7.
,
.
,
, , , , ,
,
, ,
, , , .
5. , ,
A . , ,
, () .
() , ,
, , () ,
.
6. - 2005 .
Moldova suveran.
.
7. A ,
.
3.
3.1
. , ,
1989 . .
, ()
,
.
() ,
, , , ,
, .
() .
, , ,
. ,
(
1940 .).
,
, , . ,
1990 .
(). 1991 .,
, ,
.
1989 .
.
,
.
8. 3 .
9. 4 .
10. 12 .
89
1991 .,
.
,
.
( ,
)
().
1994 .
,
. ,
(), .
. ,
() .
3.2
2004 .,
( ) 3.388.071 .
( )
(78,2%). 8,4%, 5,8%, 4,4%,
1,9%.
1,3%.11
, 2004 .
155.587 .
: 4,6%, 3%,
3,7%, 82,6%, 5,1%
0,9%. 12
11. Recensmntul 2004. ( 2004 .).
. http://www.statistica.md/recensamint.php
12. .
90
, .
, 2004 .
555.500 . 31,9%, 30,3%,
28,8%,
9%.13
13. .
. . http://www.narodru.ru/news3447.html , 9 2005 .
4.
4.1 ,
, ,
.
2004 .
.
, ()
. ,
,
. 2004 . ,
,
.
,
.
2004 .
,
. ,
(
2005 . ).
2004 .,
.
.
,
.
92
- 2005 .
.
,
, , ,
.
2005 .
,
14.
,
.
.
:
10- ( 2004 .);
500 (
2004 .);
10 A ( 2004 .);
10- ( 2004 .);
60
.
4.2
2004 . 2005 .,
,
:
;
.
14. (, , , ).
2000 . ,
. 2005 .
. .
93
,
.
,
.
.
,
.
.
.
(,
,
).
, (
) .
, ;
.
, ..
;
.
, , ,
, .
4.3
Moldova suveran
, .. ,
..
,
,
.
94
, ,
.
, ,
- ,
(
).
,
.
Moldova suveran
, ,
.
.
,
.
, ,
,
.
, ,
.
. ,
,
, ,
,
. ,
,
, , ,
,
.
.
95
A
,
.
, , ,
.
A
.
,
, .. ,
.
.
,
, .
, A
.
,
,
.
,
.
,
.
,
.
5.
5.1
15 3057 ,
.
(744)
,
570 598 (.
1):
,
, (,
). 2,
.
97
, ,
. ,
- 2004.,
- 2005 .
2005 . (. 3).
5.2 ,
.
15 1012
(33% ). ,
, 161 273.
;
,
. ,
. 4,
(47% ) Moldova suveran
(38%).
. ,
98
A , ..
,
.
,
,
15. 5,
,
:
15. ;
;
;
; , ,
.
99
(116).
,
. 81 ,
.
40%
. /
(32%
),
(. 6).
Moldova suveran
62%. ,
24,9% .
(45,9%).
A . 15
(24,4%
).
100
5.3 ,
, ,
.
(682
) 476 ,
2004 2005 . (. 7).
(67%)
. 8,
A
, .
,
, .
101
A (88%
15- ) (. 9):
5.4
( , , )
,
,
. 2004. 2005. ,
.
, 3057 3404 .
.
,
(. 10):
102
, ,
, ,
(. 11):
, ,
:
158 . (4,4%
);
130 . (3,6%);
62 . (1,7%);
22 . (0,6%);
7 . (0,2%).
. 30%
,
(. 12):
103
, -
,
.
, .
.
13,
,
:
. , A
,
, ,
!.
. ,
,
(. 14):
104
(3,7%).
, , ,
( 68,8% ,
).
. 15,
:
.
(37,7%) . , ,
29,5% ,
10,4% 22,4% .
16,
:
105
5.5 ,
,
. ,
-
, . ,
,
. , ,
,
,
40,5% ,
. 17,
, , :
A .
(, , )
, (. 18).
106
,
,
, , .
;
. ,
2005 .
, , , ,
, ,
,
, .
. , Moldova suveran
Moldova Noastr ,
.
,
.16
,
.
16.
. , 8 2005 ., . 3.
107
,
, ..
.
, ,
,
.17
, ,
.18 A
, ,
.19
,
, .
,
, .20
Moldova suveran .
,
.21
,
15
. 48,3% .
(22,8%).
, ,
; 15,4%
.
17. : , .
, 26 2005 ., . 1.
18. . , 18 2005 ., . 2.
19. Moldova are o atitudine iresponsabila fata de cetatenii ei. (
). A , 29 2005 ., . 2.
20.
. . 8 2005 ., . 1.
21. Noua generatie nu trebuie sa e afectata de probleme lingvistice (
). Moldova suveran, 1 2005 ., . 3.
108
.
(. 19):
,
,
A .
, ,
1992 .
,
.
, ( ), .
2004 . (. 20):
109
,
,
.22
.23
1992 . , ,
1992 ., 2005 . .
Moldova suveran 1990.
,
1991 ., .. ,
.24
.
.25 ,
.26
A
. ,
1992 .27
.
.
.
23. . . 16 2004, . 1.
,
. , 24 2004 ., . 1.
24. Smirnov a declarat razboi scolilor inca in 1991. (
1991 .) Moldova suveran, 17 , 2004 ., . 2.
25.
, 16 2004 ., . 2.
26. . , 23 2004 ., . 6.
27. Obstimea nistreana e ingrijorata de escaladarea incordarii. (
), A 7 , 2004 ., . 2.
6.
?
, , -
,
:
; ,
,
.
;
.
.
.
, , ;
,
.
,
.
,
, , ,
.
, ,
,
,
.
.
A
,
111
,
, ,
, , .
.
15
163 ,
,
.
,
2004 . ,
.
.
. , 19
2005 . A Noi
toi am luptat dup un singur ru ( ),
,
.
, ,
,
. ,
,
,
.28
2005 . A
2004 .
. ,
.29
30. Noi toti am luptat dupa un singur riu. A , 19 2005 ., . 3.
29. . , 25 2005 ., . 1 Laureatii
anului 2004 in ziaristica ( 2004 . ). A , 29
2005 ., . 1
112
:
,
Timpul.30 A
.31
, . ,
.
, ,
,
.
30. , . , 12 2005
., . 3.
31. . , 17 2005 .,
. 2 Viaa vine in intimpinarea celui care ii iese in intimpinare. ( ,
). A , 24 2005 ., . 4.
7.
, ,
. ,
,
.
: ,
.
,
.
,
. ,
.
.
:32
114
()
()
.
.
, ,
.
,
. ,
, ,
. , ,
.
:
;
;
;
115
, ;
;
;
..;
, ..
.
.
, ,
. ,
,
. ,
,
, ,
, .