Joseph Markenstein April 2, 2013

In phenomena, the parcel of psychotomimetic alkaloids may create what here we might call somatomimetic fusion embodiment. This use of drug induced hypnosis (when the subject is made perfectly comfortable i.e. only so much as to make euphoria), together with some form of virtual reality via back-lit LED can in fact cause a person to bi-locate through psychological infusion within the power of suggestion. Whether or not this would disturb the subject is a question for theology, not science. That being those in the past who were witnessed in two places at once (St. Padre Pio in the 1960s was witnessed both at the Vatican and at the monastery in San Giovani Rotundo through a phone call from the Vatican officials who saw him there and those at the monastery who also saw St. Padre Pio there at the same time) were mystics rather than being under a powerful hypnosis. The difference being contrast and appearing opaque; mysticism is a person who has dying Love, while a subject under deep hypnosis is dead to their free will. The former has interior active intent and the latter has passive observation. If the operator does not overtax the subject, it will be a pleasant experience; otherwise the subject will perceive being controlled by an outside mechanism in which case all subjects become agitated. The Acting Person relays this to us by joining the idea of hypnosis and seduction. Jesus has an innocent power of seduction over the bio-organic choice that the unleavened bread makes when Jesus knocks at the door to kindly ask the bread if it will give Him its substance for joyful annihilation from its former to its latter existence. Since Abram in Genesis, diplomacy through bread and wine has been known as picnic (piquenique is the French term for bury the hatchet). Morphology proper has permissible parameters of invitatory request where improper anthropomorphism is an ex-vitatory command by an operator on a subject. It means that hypnosis is NO picnic when it leaves the control of the subject to an operator other than the self. Theologically, Jesus leaves the control of bread to itself and allows it to make an informed decision rather than operating the bread into annihilation of its substantial self for Himself to be the replacement. Hypnosis in contrast, makes a forceful play temporarily seem inert or without force. When, however, the subject reaches a plateau of the nadir deep, it realizes and begins to fight; for it was relaxed into resignation before it could make the informed decision that it is fusion and not integration (fusel not integral). Integration is morphologically proper, though it still grows from the base of decline, through knowledge of the pains of integration. Fusion is anthropomorphically improper by dissention into decline, blindly opaque to the realities of suffering integration. If, and only if, a study of the phenomenon of bi-location is done with the subjects full awareness, we might see the psychology behind this mystery!