chisquare test is an association two variable S1- Frame the hypothesis Null Hypothesis and Alternate Hypothesis S2-

Level of significance 90, 95, 99 % For 95%, 0.05 Significance value will be available in the spss denoted as P For two sided hypothesis we need to divide alpha by 2 Find P value P<Alpha, Reject H0 and accept H1 P>Alpha, Reject H1 and accept H0

Chisquare test S1 H0: there is no relationship (Association) between age and internet usage# H1: There is an association between age and internet usage. S2 Level Of Significance is 95% S3 Alpha coefficient 0.05 (as it is two sided) S4 Alpha /2 = 0.025 (as it is two sided hypothesis) Analyse > Descriptive stats > Exact>statistic-chisquare

Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2sided) Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correction Likelihood Ratio Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by-Linear Association N of Valid Cases 3.222 30 1 .073
b

Exact Sig. (2sided)

Exact Sig. (1sided)

3.333

1 1 1

.068 .144 .065 .143 .072

2.133 3.398

a. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 7.50. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Chisquare=0.068 P>alpha 0.068>0.25 So we accept H0 and reject H1 So we conclude there is no relationship or association between gender and internet usage.

Symmetric Measures Value Nominal by Nominal N of Valid Cases a. Not assuming the null hypothesis. b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis. Contingency Coefficient .316 30 Approx. Sig. .068

The association between two variable is less than 50% (.316) so statistically we have proved that there is no impact of gender on internet usage

FAMILIARITY AND INTERNET USAGE

Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2sided) Pearson Chi-Square Likelihood Ratio Linear-by-Linear Association N of Valid Cases 16.819
a

5 5 1

.005 .001 .001

21.095 10.646 29

a. 12 cells (100.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .97.

Chisquare=0.005 P>alpha 0.005>0.25 So we accept H0 and reject H1 So we conclude there is no relationship or association between familarity and internet usage.

Symmetric Measures Value Nominal by Nominal N of Valid Cases a. Not assuming the null hypothesis. b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis. Contingency Coefficient .606 29 Approx. Sig. .005

The association between two variable is greater than 50% (.606) so statistically we have proved that there is impact of familarity on internet usage

Variable Gender / usage Familiarity/usage

p-value 0.068 P>0.025 0.005 P<0.025

decision Accept H0 Reject H0

contigency 0.32,32% 61%