Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
CODE OF PRACTICE FOR PLAIN AND REINFORCED CONCRETE 3 3.1 Revisions in Section 3 : General design considerations Bases for design (Cl. 18)
The new code has encouraged the use of Limit State Method design
by shifting Working Stress Method from the body of the code (Section 6 in 1978 edition) to Annex B. It has also stated that structure and structural elements should normally be designed by Limit State Method. Where the Limit State Method can not be conveniently adopted, Working Stress Method may be used. 3.2 Loads and forces (Cl. 19)
The code has simplified that in ordinary buildings, such as low rise
dwellings whose lateral dimension do no exceed 45m, the effects due to temperature fluctuations, shrinkage and creep can be ignored in design calculations. 3.3 Stability of structures (Cl. 20) In addition to other stability criteria like overturning, sliding, etc., lateral drift criteria is also important in high rise buildings. This aspect has been recognized by the new code and the lateral sway at top has been restricted to H/500, where H is the height of the building. 3.4 Fire resistance (Cl. 21)
3.5.1 Effective span (Cl. 22.2) The effective length of cantilever, which was missing in the earlier code, has been introduced and is to be taken as its length to the face of the support plus half the effective depth except where it forms the end of a continuous beam where the length to the centre of support is to be taken. 3.5.2 Structural frames (Cl. 22.4) Simplified assumptions like substitute frame has been continued except where side sway consideration becomes critical due to unsymmetry in geometry or loading, in which cases rigorous analysis is recommended. 3.5.3 Moment and shear coefficients for continuous beams (Cl. 22.5) It is interesting to note that the bending moment coefficient at middle of intermediate span has been changed from 1/24 to 1/16. The reason is not very clear unless the moment coefficient given in the earlier code was based on redistribution done inadvertently. 3.5.4 Critical section for shear (Cl. 22.6.2) The shear failure at sections without shear reinforcement will normally occur on plane inclined at an angle of 30 0 to the horizontal. Thus, if the depth of the beam is d, the critical section for shear will be at a distance of d/tan300 from the face of support. The new code has clarified that the above will be applicable for beams generally carrying uniformly distributed load and where the principal load is located further than twice the distance of critical section from the face of support. Furthermore, it is worth pointing out that the above is applicable only when load is from top and support is at bottom as has been in fig. 2(a) and 2(b). In case of fig. 2(c), whole concept is changed since the support is from top and critical section for shear is at face of support only. 3.6 Control of deflection for beams (Cl. 23.2) The span to depth ratio given in clause 23.2.1 (a) and (b) is required to be modified for tension reinforcement as per fig. 4. Earlier, the modification factor was based on area and type of steel; but this has now been rightly based on the area and actual stress of steel for tensile reinforcement. The
Bundling of bars larger than 32 mm diameter has not been permitted. For detailing of earthquake resistant construction, reference to IS
13920 has been added. 3.10.1 Lap splices (Cl. 26.2.5.1) Provisions have been added for increase in lap length where lap for a tension bar located at top and corner of a section and where minimum cover of twice the diameter of lapped bar is not available.