Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Bar code
CONTENTS
1 1.1 2 2.1 2.2 3 3.1 3.2 3.3 4 4.1 4.2 4.3 5 6 7 8 8.1 8.2 8.2.1 8.2.2 8.3 8.4 9 10 11 12 INTRODUCTION AND WELCOME ................................................................................................ 3 Tutorial matter ................................................................................................................................. 3 PURPOSE OF AND OUTCOMES FOR THE MODULE ................................................................ 3 Purpose .......................................................................................................................................... 3 Outcomes ....................................................................................................................................... 3 LECTURER AND CONTACT DETAILS......................................................................................... 3 Lecturers ......................................................................................................................................... 3 Department ..................................................................................................................................... 3 University ........................................................................................................................................ 3 MODULE RELATED RESOURCES............................................................................................... 4 Prescribed books ............................................................................................................................ 4 Recommended books ..................................................................................................................... 4 Electronic Reserves (e-Reserves) .................................................................................................. 4 STUDENT SUPPORT SERVICES FOR THE MODULE ................................................................ 4 MODULE SPECIFIC STUDY PLAN ............................................................................................... 4 MODULE PRACTICAL WORK AND WORK INTEGRATED LEARNING ..................................... 6 ASSESSMENT ............................................................................................................................... 6 Assessment plan ............................................................................................................................ 6 General assignment numbers ......................................................................................................... 6 Unique assignment numbers .......................................................................................................... 6 Due dates of assignments .............................................................................................................. 7 Submission of assignments ............................................................................................................ 7 Assignments ................................................................................................................................... 7 EXAMINATIONS .......................................................................................................................... 16 OTHER ASSESSMENT METHODS............................................................................................. 16 FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS .......................................................................................... 16 STUDENT AND MENTOR DECLARATIONS .............................................................................. 17
MEA361B/101
Dear Student 1.1 Tutorial matter Some of this tutorial matter may not be available when you register. Tutorial matter that is not available when you register will be posted to you as soon as possible, but is also available on myUnisa.
2.1 Purpose To complete a design project. 2.2 Outcomes Completed design project.
3
3.1
3.2
3.3
4
4.1
4.2
4.3
Use your my Studies @ Unisa brochure for general time management and planning skills. For Machine Design III you are required to submit three progress reports on your selected topic each time a particular phase of your design has been completed and as also discussed in the Design Project Flow Diagram plus a final project report on your design.
MEA361B/101
FIRST PROGRESS REPORT Due date: 2 May 2013 LITERATURE STUDY ALTERNATIVE CONCEPTS DECISION MAKING MATRIX FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS
SECOND PROGRESS REPORT PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW Due date: 3 June 2013
DESIGN DETAIL INCLUDING: ANALYSIS AND STRENGTH CALCULATIONS CHOICE OF MATERIALS MANUFACTURING SCHEDULE MAINTENANCE ANALYSIS RELIABILITY ANALYSIS COST ANALYSIS MASS FACTORS TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION DRAWINGS
FINAL EVALUATION
ASSESSMENT
MENTORSHIP Before a student can start his/her design project he/she will have to get a mentor in his/her workplace to guide them through the project process. The following requirements relating to the mentor must be met: i) The mentor should be registered with the Engineering Council of South Africa (ECSA) and have at least 4 years relevant experience. (Registration number required with first assignment) If the mentor is not registered with ECSA he needs to have 6 years relevant experience and a CV must be sent with the first assignment before the mentor will be accepted. A mentor should be adequately qualified in the relevant engineering field.
ii)
iii)
8.1 Assessment plan All Three Assignments (Progress reports) have to be submitted by every student before his final report can be submitted. The contents of these three assignments will be: 1. Project Proposal and Mentor information. This assignment is due by the beginning of May. 2. Literature Study and decision matrix. This assignment is due by the beginning of June. 3. Development of Design specifications and procedures, including calculations, drawings and specifications. This assignment is due by the beginning of August. All assignments have to be submitted in typed format. No hand written assignments will be accepted. Drawings can be done by hand. 8.2 General assignment numbers
Assignments are numbered consecutively per module, starting from 01 8.2.1 Unique assignment numbers The unique number for assignment 1 is: 179806. The unique number for assignment 2 is: 384472. The unique number for assignment 3 is: 320655. The unique number for the Portfolio (Final Report) is: 350090.
MEA361B/101
20 % 40 % 40 % 0
Submission of assignments No Late Assignment Submissions Will Be Accepted. Keep A Clear Copy Of The Assignment For Your Own Reference. This Is Important, As Assignments Do Get Lost. Submissions of Assignments Must Be In Accordance to the My Studies @ UNISA. It Is Your Responsibility To Check Whether Unisa Has Received Your Assignment By Contacting The Call Centre Two (2) Weeks After Submission. Assignments 1, 2 and 3 may be submitted through my Unisa. The final report (assignment 4) must be submitted through the post. Remember that for the final report 2 bound copies and the PowerPoint presentation must be submitted. 8.4 Assignments
8.4.1 Assignment 1 For assignment 1 the following will help you with the proposal. Remember to include your mentor details in this assignment. The most important step in a design process is to define what the problem is you are trying to address and solve. The definition of the problem must be as broadly defined as possible and should include writing down a formal problem statement also known as a Users Requirement. 8.4.1.1 GENERAL In order for you to learn and understand the complete design process, your final design report must include all the required details to prove that you are conversant with this process. The Users Requirement is merely the first step in this process. For Machine Design III, it is assumed that your client (and I happen to be your client) lacks the know-how and technical expertise to specify his particular requirements in technical terms. It is therefore left to you to do so and to present him with a non-technical report explaining how you understand the client's needs and how you intend going about satisfying them. Above all, ensure that your viewpoint agrees totally with that of your client otherwise you start off on the wrong premise and your final design may differ substantially from that which your client had actually expected. In Figure 1 this situation is explained graphically showing how a design depends on the viewpoint of the person defining the problem.
Figure 1 : What the final design will look like will depend on the viewpoint of the person defining the problem 8.4.1.2 ORIGIN OF REQUIREMENT
Needs are identified at many points and times in an organisation. They arise from an Research and Development division in an organisation whose job it is to create ideas that are relevant to keep the organisation competitive. They may arise from the inputs or requirements from operating personnel, sales and marketing people or from the customers. A Users Requirement typically originates from a dissatisfaction with an existing situation and is intended to reduce costs, increase reliability or performance. In particular it originates from : * a current or projected deficiency in an existing capability (process, mechanical component, machine or system or parts thereof). * an opportunity to enhance an existing capability using emerging technologies. * an opportunity to reduce the operating costs of an existing capability using technological innovation.
MEA361B/101
8.4.1.3
The Users Requirement should address as specifically as possible what the design intends to accomplish. It must include * * * * * Background to the requirement : Reasons for introducing it. Objectives and goals of the requirement : What will it be used for. Environment in which the requirement is to operate. Any constraints placed on the design. Evaluation criteria against which the final design will be evaluated.
A Users Requirement is the main output of the initial phase of a design in which the basic problem is formulated. It describes the desired capability (process, component or system) in operational terms, i.e. how it is to operate in the user's environment. It is not a specification of a system. Of course, in a fair amount of cases the user may totally or at least in part, specify the system. Obviously, the more a Users Requirement becomes a specification, the more opportunities for optimisation are pre-empted. 8.4.1.3.1 Background to the Requirement
The reasons for introducing the requirement must be given, e.g. to reduce costs, improve reliability. 8.4.1.3.2 Objective and goal of the Requirement
The ultimate aim for which the requirement is to be used must be stated. It must include a set of requirements that must be met. It may also include further requirements that are worth stating but are not hard and fast. It will help to understand certain particular preferences by the client. 8.4.1.3.3 Environment in which Requirement is to operate
This is to be described in terms of : * The support policy, describing how the user would like to support the system. It should address the following : - maintenance and repair policies. - operating and support personnel and required skills. - training and training equipment. - documentation for operations and support. - provision of spares, repair parts and supplies. - facilities. - packaging, handling, storage and transportation. * The external interfaces to other co-functioning systems, specifying only those external interfaces in cases where such co-functioning systems could constrain the design and eventual acquisition process.
9
The physical environment in which the system is to operate and to be supported. Constraints to the design
8.4.1.3.4
Guidance and constraints should as far as possible be provided, stating what the design must not be or do. If this is not done the design is unconstrained and the designers/developers have a free hand, invariably designing/developing something that does not meet the users requirements. Pertinent constraints may include : * * * * * cash flow limitations. life cycle cost ceilings. initial capabilities i.e. dates by which system should be operational. total number of systems required and the rate of their introduction. phase out requirements of existing systems. Evaluation criteria
8.4.1.3.5
Specify figures of merit against which the final design will be evaluated. As far a possible state these performance requirements quantitatively. Also define methods or test procedures to verify whether or not mission requirements have been satisfied. 8.4.2 Assignment 2 The following information will assist you with the second assignment. The format of this assignment should adhere to the following format. Layout
Front Page (Project Title included) Abstract Table of Content (Page numbers) List of Figures (Page numbers) List of Tables (Page numbers) List of Symbols Page Numbers Numbering
Body of Report
Introduction Literature Study Alternative Concepts Decision Making Matrix Functional Analysis
References
Appendices
10
MEA361B/101
8.4.2.1
GENERAL
This initiates the design and establishes the baseline from which the design will further develop. It is basically a feasibility study in which all technologically feasible, operationally practical and economically affordable concepts are evaluated. The most acceptable concept is decided upon by using a so-called decision-making matrix laying out the various alternative concepts and ranking them by some scheme in which the various design criteria affecting the decision are considered. A number of these decision matrices are available. One of these will be explained in detail. 8.4.2.2 DECISION-MAKING MATRIX Assume you are evaluating four different concepts 1 to 4 for your design. Furthermore, you have decided that in terms of the client's requirements the final design has to be evaluated in terms of the following eight performance criteria A through H : Criteria A : Technical Performance Criteria B : Reliability Criteria C : Maintainability Criteria D : Life Cycle Cost Criteria E : Development Risk Criteria F : Production Rate Criteria G : Schedules Criteria H : Safety Each of the four concepts will therefore have to be evaluated in terms of each of these eight criteria. In addition, these eight criteria have to be evaluated according to some order of importance, for instance : 0 : No difference in importance 1 : Minor difference in importance 2 : Major difference in importance 3 : Critical difference in importance Step 1 : The eight criteria are paired and then evaluated against each other according to the order of importance given above. The results will then typically look as shown in Table 1. For instance, if the difference in importance of Technical Performance A over Maintainability C is major, then the rating will be A2 (A for Technical Performance and 2 for "major difference in importance"). Similarly, if Technical Performance A is critically important over Development Risk E, the rating will be A3. Obviously, if Development Risk E had been the one that is critically important over Technical Performance A, then the rating would have been E3. The weighting factor W in Table 1 is obtained by adding the number of times the particular criteria was chosen in preference to its paired criteria, e.g. for Technical Performance A2 +
11
A3 = 5 times whereas Safety was chosen H1 + H1 + H3 + H3 + H1 = 9 times in preference to its paired criteria. TABLE 1 : PAIRING OF CRITERIA ACCORDING TO IMPORTANCE A B B1 C A2 B3 D D1 B2 C2 E A3 B2 C3 D3 F F1 F1 C2 D2 F2 G G2 B2 C2 D3 G2 G2 H H1 B1 C2 H3 H3 H1 H1 A B C D E F G H Step 2 : The influence of each performance criteria, A through H, on each concept individually must now be determined. This can be done by rating each criteria of each concept according to the following rating priority : 7 : Complete satisfaction 6 : Extensive satisfaction 5 : Considerable satisfaction 4 : Moderate satisfaction 3 : Minor satisfaction 2 : Minimal satisfaction 1 : Marginal satisfaction Criteria Technical Performance Reliability Maintainability Life Cycle Cost Development Risk Production Rate Schedule Safety W 5 11 11 9 0 4 6 9
12
MEA361B/101
Step 3 : The rating R for each criteria and for each concept is now multiplied with the weighting factor W obtained in Table 1 to obtain a final value weight as shown in Table 2 : TABLE 2 : WEIGHTING OF CRITERIA PER CONCEPT Concept 1 Concept 2 Concept 3 Concept 4 Criteria W R WxR R WxR R WxR R WxR Technical Performance 5 6 30 3 15 4 20 2 10 Reliability 11 5 55 4 44 4 44 3 33 Maintainability 11 4 44 1 11 2 22 4 44 Life Cycle Cost 9 3 27 3 27 2 18 5 45 Development Risk 0 5 0 1 0 1 0 4 0 Production Rate 4 1 4 6 24 2 8 3 12 Schedule 6 2 12 4 24 2 12 3 18 Safety 9 3 27 4 36 1 9 5 45 TOTAL 199 181 133 217 Step 4 : From Table 2 it is obvious that concept 4 has received the highest weighting. On the basis of your rating this concept is therefore the most suitable.
13
8.4.3 Assignment 3 For assignment 3 your report should cover the following details: Layout
Front Page (Project Title included) Abstract Table of Content (Page numbers) List of Figures (Page numbers) List of Tables (Page numbers) List of Symbols Page Numbers Numbering
Body of Report
Introduction Analysis and Strength Calculations Choice of Materials Manufacturing Schedule Maintenance Schedule Reliability Analysis Cost Analysis References
14
MEA361B/101
8.4.4 Portfolio For the final report you need to submit 2 bound copies plus a PowerPoint presentation. The following should be covered in your report. If the following four items are not adhered to you cannot pass the subject. Bound 2 Copies PowerPoint presentation Mentor Information Layout
Front Page (Project Title included) Abstract Table of Content (Page numbers) List of Figures (Page numbers) List of Tables (Page numbers) List of Symbols Page numbering Numbering
Body of Report
Introduction Literature Study Alternative Concepts Decision Making Matrix Functional Analysis Analysis and Strength Calculations Choice of Materials Manufacturing Schedule Maintenance Schedule Reliability Analysis Cost Analysis Bibliography / References
15
EXAMINATIONS
Use your my Studies @ Unisa brochure for general examination guidelines and examination preparation guidelines. DUE DATE FOR THE SUBMISSION OF THE FINAL REPORT Examination session October/November 2013 Due date 30 September 2013
Two bound copies of your final design project report, and the PowerPoint presentation, must be submitted to UNISA on or before the due date. It will then be evaluated by your lecturer and the moderator in accordance with the evaluation criteria set out in the Evaluation form available on my Unisa, after which a preliminary mark will be given. With your final report you must also send a PowerPoint presentation of your work for evaluation. This presentation together with your final report will give you your final exam mark. Your final report must contain the following two documents : a declaration by you stating that the content of the report is your own work ; and a declaration by your mentor stating that to the best of his/her knowledge the work presented in your report is your own. Samples of these declarations are given in the study guide. They are reproduced for your convenience and attached to this tutorial letter under point 12. Your final report will not be evaluated unless these two declarations form part of the report. Also note that all three progress reports must have been submitted and a minimum average mark of 50% obtained, before you can submit your final design report . The Final Report has to be submitted by 30 September 2013. Late reports will not be marked. Students who received 40% to 49% for their reports will be eligible for a supplementary and these supplementary reports have to be submitted by middle January. Two copies are required. Final reports have to be professionally bound.
10
11
The my Studies @ Unisa brochure contains an A-Z guide of the most relevant study information.
16
MEA361B/101
12
UNISA
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING MACHINE DESIGN III (MEA361B) DECLARATION BY STUDENT
I .............................................................. declare that the work contained in my design project report entitled. ...................................................................................................................................... for the subject Machine Design III, is my own work and has not been submitted to any other tertiary institution as a design project. ...................................... ..................................... Date Signature of student ..................................... Name in print ..................................... Student number Witnesses : ..................................... .....................................
17
UNISA
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING MACHINE DESIGN III (MEA361B) DECLARATION BY MENTOR
I, ................................................ acting as mentor for ........................................................... in the subject Machine Design III, declare that to the best of my knowledge the work contained in the design project report entitled ... ................................................................................................................................. by ........... ................................... Student No. ............................ is his/her own work. ...................................... Date ..................................... Signature of mentor ..................................... Name in print ..................................... Telephone No. ..................................... ECSA Registration No
18