Sunteți pe pagina 1din 2

Though infinite in expression, there are a limited number of acausal archetypal personalities or personators, each of which manifests causally

as a multiplicity of perceived individual sentient beings throughout several universes and worlds simultaneously. Each manifest individual is indistinguishable from its counterparts at the level of the acausal substrate and, though they may vary in appearance and order of unfolding, are always analogous in function. What an individual sometimes perceives as a past life memory is actually a parallel life psychoharmonic convergence, a trick of transdimensional resonance. Past lives are, in truth, impossible to recall, as there is nothing of the individual persona that survives death other than the acausal archetype which continuously puts forth such extensions of itself. This explains the variances and inconsistencies of historic details in past life recollections (though a number of such inconsistencies can be explained as a fault in the hypnotists use of suggestion, and such instances are well documented and often disregarded wholesale by new age gurus, not all methods of recollection require the typical banal hypnotic state, but states of a more gnostic pitch and variety which yield far better results). Know that there are versions of our own world where Rome never ended, where Christianity was forgotten in favor of Rationalism, where firearms were never invented, and where Hitler won World War II. With each moment we create a world, and though all other possibilities do not actually cease to exist, they do for us in this moment of three dimensional causal time. But time, in truth, is no arrow, no A to B linear contraption; it is entirely nonlinear, a hyper-temporal indeterministic probability field, each zero dimensional vertex of which is a Now marking the unique combination of countless possible pasts and futures. The archetypes that manifest each entity in three dimensions are in fact acausal hyper-dimensional existents, ourselves being causal three dimensional cross-sections of our Selves. So that which dies never was and that which Is is incomprehensible without death. This paradox is what the Buddhists have named Samsara. It is not the self that awakens to Buddha-hood but the Self, the eternal acausal archetype which personates as our transitory egoic self and myriad various other selves. That self awakened to Self is liberated and is said to be Enlightened. The personators of our selves, being acausal, cannot be perceived directly, much in the same way that we cannot perceive light except as it interacts with matter. These archetypes differ from the Platonic Forms in that the appearance of multiple beings sharing the same personating archetype will very greatly in appearance and, from world to world, there must be considered the additional variance of species. They also differ from the Forms in that they are not molds, but acausal lifeforms of four or more dimensions, and being acausal are imperceptible to us save through their interaction with the four elements in three dimensions: energy, mass, space, and time. It may be that all selves are the same in source, and each individual thing is the worms eye view of a singular, massive, hyper-dimensional entity whose body we perceive only roughly as reality, as self, selves, and other. This entity might rightly be called God or A God though the personating archetypes remain semi-independent extensions of this One Being. In much the same way that we cannot conceive of the appearance of eleven dimensional matter, we cannot grasp the appearance of sentients such as these. When a person awakens to ones true Self, if one's ego does not flee in horror from this realization, than the individual is destroyed at the moment of awakening and only the God remains. This is Augoeides, the Great Work, which is called the Knowledge and Conversation of The Holy Guardian Angel (to use Aleister Crowley's terminology). And what is the egoic self but a mass of whirling inconsistencies? Is

not conscious thought the enemy of perfect action? With no self to complicate Self there can only be mastery. It is said that only the causal does not exist because it is in constant flux (Samsara). That which is eternal does not change but is only perceived as change involving perspective (Nirvana). So the world of forms, being impermanent, is nonexistent. So it is that our self, being causal, is NOT, and can only know that which IS through it's own destruction. But death does not constitute liberation, only a brief glimpse of the acausal substrate. As far as examples of psychoharmonic convergence, I can best speak from the standpoint of my own experiences. I have had recall of several lives, not all of which were on this planet nor even in this particular universe. Some of these experiences were so bizarre that I have no words to describe them. Others were more mundane and recognizable, if not for slight differences from known facts. I need to make a distinction between what is fancy and what is genuine convergence: when one imagines things, one is typically aware of what one is doing, in instances of genuine convergence, one is purely a witness and wholly unable to effect change in the landscape of the experience (though once a self, looking in the mirror, suspected that I was looking back at him through his very own eyes). Though I have had one brief moment of hyper-awareness in which I beheld my nuclear Self, my ego withdrew screaming and I burst from my meditation in a sweat, heart palpitating furiously. It is appears to be far easier to access an individual other self than it is to access experiences of multiple selves at once. I think it safe to say that those who have, have gone spectacularly mad.

S-ar putea să vă placă și