Abstract:

The universe exhibits the property of being in equilibrium with itself and our current observations in
our local space are sufficient to make that case. There are points of mater and points of space. A point is
that which has no part; no length, width, or breadth; yet has properties such as existence or non
existence; and can be said to have a relative position and energy. A point of mater is unobservable as a
point; however, if enough points of mater come together or if a point of mater have sufficient energy
then their effects can be observable with todays technology yet a single point of mater remains
unobserved unless that observed particle is a point of mater is the smallest neutral particle in the
universe.

This paper seeks to give an argument for the a mass for the photon and an algorithm to find the mass of
any unobserved compost particle including specifically the particle Ω0cb. This algorithm has the
property such that for every epsilon of improvement in the explanation of observed data for the
subatomic particles by harmonic equations (including the string theories which make use of higher
dimensions) there exists a delta of computational power given to the algorithm such that the algorithm
will show more convincingly that the universe exhibits the property of being in equilibrium with itself.

This paper opposes the theory of the big bang.

Abstract:

The universe exhibits the property of being in equilibrium with its constituents. Our current
observations in our local space are sufficient to make that case. There are points of mater
and points of space. A point is that which has no part; no length, width, or breadth; yet has
properties such as existence or non existence; and can be said to have a relative position
and energy. A point of mater is unobservable as a point; however, if enough points of mater
come together or if a point of mater have sufficient energy then their effects can be
observable with today's technology.

This paper seeks to give an argument for the a mass for the photon and an algorithm to find
the mass of any compost particle including specifically the particle Ω0cb which has yet to
be observed. This algorithm has the property such that for every epsilon of improvement in
the explanation of observed data for the subatomic particles by harmonic equations
(including the string theories which make use of higher dimensions) there exists a delta of
computational power given to the algorithm such that the algorithm will show more
convincingly that the universe exhibits the property of being in equilibrium with
constituents.

This paper opposes the theory of the big bang.

Let (S, f) be a game with n particles, where Si is the decay chain set for particles i, S=S1 X S2 ... X Sn is
the set of decay chains and f=(f1(x), ..., fn(x)) is the payoff function. Let x − i be a decay chains of all
particles except for particle i. When each particles i ∈ {1, ..., n} has decay chains xi resulting in decay
chains x = (x1, ..., xn) then particle i obtains payoff fi(x). Note that the payoff depends on the decay
chain chosen, i.e. on the strategy chosen by player i as well as the strategies chosen by all the other
players.

A decay chains x* ∈ S is said to be in equilibrium if no unilateral deviation in strategy by any particle

is profitable for that particle, that is

∀ i , x i ∈S i , x i ≠x *i : f i  x *i , x *-i ≥ f i  x i , x *-i .
Which if the sum total of things was known would be the strict equilibrium.
∀ i , x i ∈S i , x i ≠x *i : f i  x *i , x *-i  f i  x i , x*-i  .

∀ i, xū∈ ≠ ≤

≥
Now take for example the chain of hydrogen and helium, the set of particles with one or two protons
respectively. The temperature at which elemental hydrogen condenses around itself is about 20 kelvin
and the temperature at which elemental helium condenses around itself is about 4 kelvin where as the
cosmic background radiation is used to give an estimate for the average temperature of space as being
2.7 kelvin. In this state of things it is clear that there must therefore exist areas of space where
hydrogen and helium can condense outside of stars and planets and that the colder that area becomes
the grater likelihood that the hydrogen and helium which occupy that area will condense to form larger
and larger condensates which will in tern create larger and larger lumps of mater which on a long
enough time frame may even themselves condense onto each other as well in a sufficiently cold part of
space form crystals or liquids ids which when large enough should become dense enough by their own
gravity and size, along with the various other particles which are likely to occupy that space form into
planets and then stars.
These stars will smash together the lighter isotopes to form heavier isotopes.

Now observe this table of isotopes colored by decay modes:

 The table of isotopes by decay mode

Z is the number of Protons and N is the number of Neutrons in this graph. Note that this graph only
shows the most prevalent decay mode and that the areas marked stable are also unknown but requires
things which do not happen often enough to occur or in the lab to detect.
http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/nudat2/reColor.jsp?newColor=dm

EC+β+ decay is the capture of an electron which turns a proton into a neutron and produces a photon;
the result is that Z decreases by one and N increases by one along with the production of a photon
accounting for the remaining energy.
β- decay is the decay of a neutron into a proton releasing an electron and a photon; the result is that Z
increases by one and N decreases by one along with the production of a photon accounting for the
remaining energy.
α decay is the decay where two protons and two neutrons are ejected along with a photon; the result is
that Z decreases by two and N increases by two and a free helium nucleus is created along with the
production of a photon accounting for the remaining energy.
P decay is the ejection of a proton along with a photon; the result is that Z decreases by one and
hydrogen:0, that is, a free proton is created along with a photon accounting for the remaining energy;
this process can result in a chain that produces neutrons by electron capture.
N decay is the ejection of a neutron along with a photon; the result is that N decreases by one and a free
neutron is created along with a photon accounting for the remaining energy.
SF decay is the spontaneous fission of the nucleus into two or more parts made of smaller particles and
nuclei.
 The decay products of the fission of Pu239

Z is the number of Protons and N is the number of Neutrons in this graph.

http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/nudat2/reColor.jsp?newColor=239pufy

As you can see fission can produce a wide array of products.

 The table of isotopes by stability

Z is the number of Protons and N is the number of Neutrons in this graph. Note the slight curve. Note
the area of instability. Note that all elements have radioactive isotopes.
http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/nudat2/reColor.jsp?newColor=t12
A game can have a pure strategy NE or an NE in its mixed extension (that of choosing a pure strategy
stochastically with a fixed frequency). Nash proved that if we allow mixed strategies, then every n-
player game in which every player can choose from finitely many strategies admits at least one Nash
equilibrium.
When the inequality above holds strictly (with > instead of ) for all players and all feasible alternative
strategies, then the equilibrium is classified as a strict Nash equilibrium. If instead, for some player,
there is exact equality between and some other strategy in the set S, then the equilibrium is
classified as a weak Nash equilibrium.

and shows the coherence of a picture of the world with observed data if the mathematical formulas for
gravity from relativity are applied unto the subatomic particles and gives an algorithm which should for
every epsilon of improvement in the explanation of observed data for the subatomic particles by
harmonic equations there exists a delta of computational power be given to the algorithm such that the
algorithm will show more convincingly that the universe exhibits the property of being in equilibrium
with itself. This paper also seeks to give masses for all unknown particles based on the already
observed masses of the particles. This paper opposes the theory of the big bang.

Let (S, f) be a game with n players, where Si is the strategy set for player i, S=S1 X S2 ... X Sn is the set
of strategy profiles and f=(f1(x), ..., fn(x)) is the payoff function. Let x − i be a strategy profile of all
players except for player i. When each player i {1, ..., n} chooses strategy xi resulting in strategy
profile x = (x1, ..., xn) then player i obtains payoff fi(x). Note that the payoff depends on the strategy
profile chosen, i.e. on the strategy chosen by player i as well as the strategies chosen by all the other
players. A strategy profile x* S is a Nash equilibrium (NE) if no unilateral deviation in strategy by
any single player is profitable for that player, that is

A game can have a pure strategy NE or an NE in its mixed extension (that of choosing a pure strategy
stochastically with a fixed frequency). Nash proved that if we allow mixed strategies, then every n-
player game in which every player can choose from finitely many strategies admits at least one Nash
equilibrium.
When the inequality above holds strictly (with > instead of ) for all players and all feasible alternative
strategies, then the equilibrium is classified as a strict Nash equilibrium. If instead, for some player,
there is exact equality between and some other strategy in the set S, then the equilibrium is
classified as a weak Nash equilibrium.