Unedited/Untitled God cannot be destroyed because God will not destroy himself. If he can be destroyed then he is not God.

He is always God. If he destroys himself he will no longer be considered God even by himself. God has the ability to do anything he wishes, but decides not to do so because he will no longer be God. Even a person would not destroy himself if they were wise. Wisdom is having knowledge of all things and acting in common sense and to the p leasure of ones self. God is everywhere by being able to see, hear, smell, touch, and taste, plus all unknown senses to man, without making movement from his current space except with that of the senses. God is king of the universe because he has the ability to enforce his will without the consent of another person, place, thing, idea. God is one, but is two separate beings, male and female, because they work together, are married, have common interests besides that of their gender preferences. Acting in accord is always considered acting as one. Acting as one is one because God does not oppose itself. If it did it would not be considered one, but only two. There is a dual nature to all things. When speaking of God one is mentioned because both have the same ability, do not oppose each other, and never will or be divided. God is usually considered to be a he because the first universe will be destroyed by the masculine personality it. Also he is mentioned because of the nature of translation and the predominance of the males above the female within Gods creation. In the Quran the name Allah is neither plural nor feminine because the masculine personality of God will destroy the universe. Plural is two or more entities, but God is not plural because they are one in every sense of the word because they are collectively called God and without one there would not be the other; therefore, god is neither plural nor feminine means that being a colle ctive God has disclosed what God is not, but not exactly what God is. God is exact in everything he does. Throughout this document he is used because I am a male, and feel comfortable with using that term to denote God. While God is God he is all-powerful, but once he creates a being stronger than himself he will not be God, so God will not destroy himself. God is all-knowing because he can every-sense everything. He can every-sense everything because he exists eternally and that is how he exists. Since he was not born he always is with faculty which he has possessed time immemorial. Being not born explains the point that he is and never was not. Some questions do not make sense because there may not be root cause to a person, place, thing, or idea. How God is all-powerful? He is all-powerful because he has the ability to do all things. Is God all-powerful? That question need not be answered because this knowledge is merely based on hope, blind faith, signs in creation, and by the revealing of himself. The faculties of hope, love, etc was not instilled in us without some force behind it. By God being eternal means that he will never destroy himself. There should be no cause to figure out if God exists, but only by signs in creation. God created everything in his image, so it is also two. If we are in the image of God then God is two. There is no argument between the God personalities because they are wise, all-knowing, and since they are wise they know to compromise. God is compassionate because he has no reason to show animosity because we are far from being compared to him. Everybody talk about somebody possibly being an angel, but you will not always know who may be God. God is above his creation in every sense of the concept. If he wanted to incarnate into human form within this world nobody can stop him. Anybody can see God, but knowing what constitutes God can either end for the better or worst.

For the worst would be destruction by God and for the better For the worst would be plotting against God. You would be destroyed the first exact minuscule fraction of a second if the sentence before was the case. For the better would be not plotting against God. Since there is no common sense record of there being a God, trying to explain that God exists will not be undertaken. We will assume that God exists for the disclosure of this document because of the limited language humans possess and the limited terminology thereof. God is incomprehensible because there is no extensive comprehensive knowledge of his constitution and there is not enough terminology and expressive language at the time for the dissemination of his constitution. There is good and evil potential to everything in the universe, so if a human knows God and he is evil then he may or may not like God because God is good. And even though he may know that he cannot defeat God he may try to commit evil acts because he will know that God may postpone his punishment and he may be so evil and mischievous that he may wallow in his thoughts, actions, and intentions. Everybody has the ability to love and hate. God would not keep a person away from his presence since God has the ability to steer an evil person to do good and God has been, is, and always will be wise, so there is evil in the world, and there is a heaven and hell. Wise is one of Gods attributes. Being far away from Gods presence as hell, and close to Gods presence as heaven (as the Bahais have it) is just another explanation of these two extremes. God never changes absolutes; however, he does change physical-related concepts and laws. Explanations are only changed to suit the current generations needs. What will God say about heaven and hell during the proclamation of his next religion? The proximity to God can bring up many images from a discerning mind if one was to contemplate the words of the great prophets. The proceeding sentence is a partly a requisite written and spoken by all prophets since Adam. Nothing should be taken as face value unless scrutiny of the voices and documents deems it otherwise. It is written that God is not begotten and does not beget, but what is creation? Someone who is kin is considered that only because he came from a certain person or people. How can there be incorrect translations when the Quran cannot be changed and angels guard it, but only the language may be strange in a different language, but can be adapted quickly? And the print of the Quran is no matter, but the words of God are what matter. Plus Islam is for the whole population of the earth as stated in the Quran. Why is there verses in the Quran that are considered only Allah knows when the whole Quran is supposed to be an evident sign of Allah? Why does God not show himself if he has pride? If Islam was for the whole world, then how can somebody come after Muhammad and say the same thing he did, but say that he is the first one to do that? Abdul Baha and Shoghi Effendi are the official interpreters of the Bahai Faith, but anybody can interpret the teachings only with scrutiny from the one listening, reading, etc o(of) the unofficial interpretations. Being the official interpretations means that every effort should be made to arrive at the answers and that they will, unless he is not able, but still those teachings should be followed until the answer be revealed or death occurs in order to be considered a Bahai. Those teachings need not be followed if not found to be true by study and meditation and there is no wrong in that. Unofficial interpretations, when cannot be found to be true, need not be found true with effort. How can you go from there being an end to the world to there being more than one world on a continuous stream? How can there be an end to this world, but there be more prophets coming after one another on a continuous stream. How can there be judgment (with descriptions), but that end up being a symbol for the

coming twin-prophets. What if the next prophet say that the teachings believed to be literal today of the present prophet are only symbols of something even greater or something else? Were we given the mind in order to figure out these types of things for ourselves? Of course we were. Everything was created with wisdom. God is not without wisdom, for he is all-wise. If God is incomprehensible, but we can know God through the prophets why is there such little knowledge of God. Knowing all things you have no choice, but to act accordingly. The writings state that you dont have to practice religion in order to be accepted by God. There isnt any way to tell whether a verse is a symbol or not without scrutiny. Plus these plain, but esoteric lines within all religions are all supposed to be signs that God has appeared in the world now and soon will be made manifest. For someone has come with an eye opener! Now there is a document that threatens the very fabric of scriptures past, but those scriptures need not be thrown away. Even though they are not always literal, they should be studied for an ocean is coming soon that will never be forgotten by those who will take heed. How can Christianity be true when the literal interpretation of both the Quran and Bible contradict themselves, and both be true under the Bahai Faith? Can God change his mind when the new testament and the old testament differ? How can Jesus say that he did not come to destroy the law, but fulfill it, and change some of the laws? Why will war never end? Why did the United States fall when other countries got tired of her? Was Muhammad the last prophet, messenger, or both or as one? How is God eternal if he is not effected/affected by time? Why was the world created if humans do not take away or add to Gods kingdom? If God said that Iblis was a Djinn, why is there no dev il? Have you tried to combine the writings of past prophets and the present one and tried to comprehend it literally and figuratively? You are surely allowed to combine just two major ones and see what happens. Remember the missing books. Since there are prophets and messengers according to Islam, and there be some who are both doesnt that mean that Bahaullah is just a prophet if all givers of Allahs direct or indirect word are manifestations? Read again and take heed. Is this not a response to a challenge in the sacred books? Just because angels cant enter a house where there is a dog and angels follow rain drops to the ground (angels being childish and in wonderment) doesnt mean angels are in that house of the dog where the rain drop falls. Imagination is one of the keys to interpretation since God is all-powerful. Since God is all-powerful doesnt mean angels (or any other being) dont have special powers of their own. Who can add to Gods words, but God himself? How is man not comparable to God? Have you thought about contrasting man with God? If man has two arms, but God has no arm s as man has, doesnt that mean that God can be many armed? If man has one face and God has no face like man, doesnt that mean that God has many faces? The same goes for legs, feet, eyes, ears and head. For the torso, if there is no comparison, then there is a contrast. Since there are signs in creation, then there must be signs within objects that are manmade. For the purpose of this document, create (and its derivatives) means from nothing and without tools; and make (and its derivatives) mean fashion with tools, such as computers. And since God created man, are there not signs within man himself and what he makes. What makes you think that God will not reward or punish you for what is contained within your mass (mass is truly only known by God)? What makes you think that when God arrives there will not be a mass disclosure of information relating to reality (creation and made objects)? What makes you think that knowledge is all there is as far as knowing, etc (other words

not in humans languages) goes? What makes you think that God do not create degrees in knowledge within infinity (and circular) from what he already knows? Why is the universe truly expanding? I say it now. Creation is always a constant process because in order to be a creator there has to be desire to create new objects as existing and past objects will provoke the anger of God and because God is beautiful if only you knew. Above the essence of God was written of to point to Gods anger. Adding to or subtracting from Gods kingdom is letting it be known that he is of quick temper (time immemorial). She will destroy the universe on a swing (one personality destroys it one after the other). The throne of God is the universe because there is nothing that can stop him; however, this universe is only partially compared to a human kings domain for explaining that no one has ever been, is, and forever will control the universe, but God. Control is done from the throne of Gods mass because everywhere God goes there is his rule. Isnt my language plain, simple, and mostly easy to scrutinize without using all those metaphors, parables, etc? Know of a certainty that two in the Quran referring to God is now understood and can be said without there being misconception because the general explanations thereof are explained above. Adding words ot Gods word by the creation is the only contamination of sacred writings that may occur. Have you remembered when the words of some books were changed, but assumed the position of Gods word from the past (of mankind), presently, and to secretly, but openly happen again. Whats the differences in childhood to now from the early 1980s? Was that a flash of great er remembrance that you cannot not recall? Tell me the hours in a day without using a time instrument. Was it 24, 48, etc hours? God is merciful by giving not only Iblis, but all of mankind respite for some time. If God knows he is able to deter the evil within ones heart then one has not to worry about receiving the anger of God. If t here is symbology in the writings what makes you think that God is one is not a symbol? Wake up people! With there being evident truths, it is also written that symbology is used throughout. How can God be the first and last when he is also eternal? What makes you think that since God is immemorial he has not come out to meet us? Why would us, and we, are used in the Quran? Just because a king may use those terms to denote his importance, etc isnt God comparing himself to a king, but he is not comparable to any human. Where were you when the Islamic empires fell, but another one rose up in its place? And then there is to be lesser and greater peaces, but will that not fall also and evil return. How can we be in the image of God, but he is incomparable? Can you count an infinite number of times and stop counting? What happens when the truth of a previous religion is made manifest within the present religion, but that truth is trampled upon? If there is the law of opposites and there is absolute nothing there is also absolute something. That absolute something is God and that absolute nothing is where he creates from. Why would God say that he knows what is in the hearts of humans and he being absolute? Is there not more to it than that? If God would punish us wouldnt there be more evil to us than what we normally think of.