First of all, I have to say I lived in Sweden on two occasions in my life, in both Gteborg and Stockholm, coincidently enough

I lived in Berjn and Varberg, the "Worst" places in those cities, with more than 80% of the population are immigrants, the only reason to be honest why I lived in those particular neighborhoods that are so famous now is because they had waiting lists in Sweden in the agencies if you were to rent a flat in the better parts of the city, and I don't plan so I just go there and rent whatever available, and since I was playing internet poker for a living at that time, I only needed to go to the city in the weekends for party. Having lived there I have to say that most people who live there are just people (contrary to the popular belief), I also have several friends who's parents came from Bosnia, Sudan, Iran.. and who are no different than any other Swedish person, some of them are successful people by the way.. But anyways, let's cut to the chase, let's deal with the riots, and maybe the big picture. Apparently some old man was holding a knife/machete depending which news channel, that old man refused to put down the blade, and exchanged some "threats" with the cops who didn't hesitate and shoot him dead, so some immigrants from that suburb felt targeted and took it to the street, those were stupid kids full with adrenaline, who act on their primitive instinct "I'm gonna break something! Let's burn something!" other people from other suburbs did the same, soon enough they started complaining/revolting against the unemployment the inequality.. It created such confusion that they don't even remember what they're rioting for (some people say that they were agent provocateurs involved, I didn't take time to verify it so I wouldn't take it in consideration) The media, oh the media! of course had a role to play "Aftonbladet" and "expressen" probably the two major papers there seem to insist on the premise " They don't want to integrate!" That and politians who of course never let a good crisis go to waste, have been trying to circulate that thought among the populous. This has a bigger story behind it! RT is the one of the few channels that actually tried to get the two sides of the story, interviewed a guy called Bosse Jonsson, and he's the founder of "The Free Party of Sweden"* (* observation below), what Bosse had to say was very interesting, first he said "The Swedish democrats are exploiting these events, they make it all about immigration to suit their needs! For them being anti-immigrant is to be pro-Sweden!" Ok, nothing new here, vultures, sorry i meant politians using their never-getting-old trick, you've heard it before and you'll hear it again: "Defense of the Homeland", "Patriotism", "the fatherland", "the glory of Rome", "the mother Russia".. Give it a few years and you'll see one world government people screaming for "Mother earth"! The other interesting thing that Bosse said is the following: "It's the state that create these types of situations, they move everyone from abroad to these parts of town" Now, Bosse said an important thing here, "It's the state that create these types of situations", you see that move by the Swedish government to move foreigners to the outskirts of the city, is done to almost every big city in Europe, "Lava pies" in Madrid, "Argenteuil" in Paris, "Kreuzberg" in Germany, or "Varberg" in Sweden, and those neighborhoods are always poor, no matter which country, there is less job opportunities, which result in inevitably in more crime.. The governments of course took part (sometimes covertly sometimes overtly) in the destruction of jobs and industries to keep them demoralized, just like when Roosevelt ordered to burn fields of crops DURING the great depression ( You can see that for example in documentaries like "The end of liberty") or the efforts that different administrations took to destroy the economy of the southern states, so the children grow up demoralized, they grow up in that fight or flight state that will be useful later when you send those children to die! That's why if you look at the Army, navy..etc you will find that most of those soldiers come from southern states.

This is nothing new, it has been called different names all through history: "Ideological subversion", "Active measure", or as you might know it "Psychological warfare", because such person who has been demoralized, is easy prey to any type of indoctrination and completely unable to acess true information, exposure to the truth doesn't matter anymore, even if you shower them with real proof, they will still refuse to believe it! That is actually happening to half the planet, but that's a different story all together.. This not a new thing, if you go back to the Roman empire you find that Marcus Aurelius populated certain areas only with immigrants, he put them in the parts that has been destroyed by plagues and hunger, so by doing he gained a red herring in a sense that whenever there's another hunger, he will be able to direct the populus and their anger towards those immigrants by making some selected sayings popular like: "too many mouths to feed", you know the drill.. After all the Romans never saw the immigrants as equals, they referred to them as "barbarians" who kept their old ways (sound familiar?) What most people don't know is that the Romans were studying human behavior as well, so they found out that people are generally run by two emotions, to run away from pain and to run towards pleasure, so that the people would rather go after the immigrants that they feel superior to, than after the real cause and face their praetorian army. Where does those riots fit in the grand scheme of things? Why is there certain interest in increasing hate against the muslims? To make it easier for people not to protest against the next attack? Or is it to increase the tension in that area to prepare for an even bigger war against those people we already hate? The sad thing is people never seem to connect the dots, in the Spanish civil war, after the war was over, Jos Maria Doussinague, who was at the time undersecretary at the Spanish Foreign Ministry, said, "without American petroleum and American trucks, and American credit, we could never have won the Civil War." Without that victory if Spain had turned to fighting fascism, Hitler would not have attempted a two-front war. There would not have been World War II. So why would American companies have interest in starting a major war, like WW2? Someone from the Texas oil company said that the Spanish Civil war was essential, in order to keep the tension in that area as a prelude to WW2. Are we seeing the same pattern? Are they promoting hate, and dehumanizing certain group of people to set the ground for an attack? or is it that they just started early to make certain thoughts circulate to prep the next generation? Put the Lisbon treaty into the puzzle and maybe the board will seem clearer. *I never heard of Bosse Jonsson, of the free party, but RT presented him as such, I am well aware of the Pirate party of sweden, but weren't able to find the free party on the internet, felt like I had to clarify that.