Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
What is Vibration?
Vibration Terms
q. re f h hig
overall vibration
tim
e
low
fre
q.
y nc e qu fre
individual vibration signals combine to form a complex time waveform showing overall vibration
Scale Factors
When comparing overall vibration signals, it is imperative that both signals be measured on the same frequency range and with the same scale factors.
Sensor Relationships
100 Displacement (microns) 10 Acceleration (g's - 9,81m/sec2)
1.0
Velocity (mm/sec)
Frequency (Hz)
Multi-Parameter Monitoring
Same Data in Velocity and Acceleration Velocity Spectrum
On the same bearing cap, low freq. events (imbalance, misalignment, etc.) show best in the velocity spectrum; while high freq. events (bearing faults, gearmesh) show best in the acceleration spectrum
Acceleration Spectrum
Accelerometers
Rugged Devices Operate in Wide Frequency Range (Near 0 to above 40 kHz) Good High Frequency Response Some Models Suitable For High Temperature Require Additional Electronics
(may be built into the sensor housing)
Amplitude
Ti
Amplitude
Amplitude
Fr
eq
n ue
cy
Ti
1x T re n d o f B a la n c e .3 in /s e c
2x
10x T re n d o f B e a r in g s A la r m T im e (D a y s )
T im e (D a y s )
.1 in /s e c
A2 - 8.2.4. BPFI Pomp PNV P1/K10 -PNV POMP NIET-KOPP VERTIKAAL Route Spectrum 30-jan-96 15:14:51 OVERALL= 13.52 V-DG RMS = 13.46 LOAD = 100.0 RPM = 2987. (49.78 Hz) Fault Limit
12
8
Misalignment
0 0 500 1000 1500 Frequency in Hz 2000 2500 Freq: 475.00 Ordr: 9.542 Spec: .06356
Bearing
Looseness
Overall Vibration
The total vibration energy measured within a specific frequency range.
includes a combination of all vibration signals within measured frequency range does not include vibration signals outside measured frequency range produces a numerical value
0 0 500 1000 1500 Frequency in Hz 2000 2500 Freq: 1321.9 Ordr: 26.55 Spec: .119
Vibration
-Imbalance -Misalignment -Looseness -Bearing problems -Belt problems -Gear problems -Lubrification -Electrical problems -Resonance -Sleeve Bearing problems -Other
Vibration analysis
"Of all the parameters that can be measured non intrusively in industry today, the one containing the most information is the vibration signature." Art Crawford Vibration Analysis is the foundation of a predictive maintenance program
SIGNATURE ANALYSIS
Which frequencies exist and what are the relationships to the fundamental exciting frequencies. What are the amplitudes of each peak How do the peaks relate to each other If there are significant peaks, what are their source
Vibration analysis
Unbalance
COUPLE UNBALANCE
1800 out of phase on the same shaft 1X RPM always present and normally dominates Amplitude varies with square of increasing speed Can cause high axial as well as radial amplitudes Balancing requires Correction in two planes at 180o
1X RPM present in radial and axial directions Axial readings tend to be in-phase but radial readings might be unsteady Overhung rotors often have both force and couple unbalance each of which may require correction
Diagnosing Unbalance
Vibration frequency equals rotor speed. Vibration predominantly RADIAL in direction. Stable vibration phase measurement. Vibration increases as square of speed. Vibration phase shifts in direct proportion to measurement direction.
900
900
Vibration analysis
Misalignment/Bent shaft
ANGULAR MISALIGNMENT
Characterized by high axial vibration 1800 phase change across the coupling Typically high 1 and 2 times axial vibration Not unusual for 1, 2 or 3X RPM to dominate Symptoms could indicate coupling problems
PARALLEL MISALIGNMENT
1x 2x 4x
Radial
High radial vibration 1800 out of phase Severe conditions give higher harmonics 2X RPM often larger than 1X RPM Similar symptoms to angular misalignment Coupling design can influence spectrum shape and amplitude
MISALIGNED BEARING
Vibration symptoms similar to angular misalignment Attempts to realign coupling or balance the rotor will not alleviate the problem. Will cause a twisting motion with approximately 1800 phase shift side to side or top to bottom
BENT SHAFT
Bent shaft problems cause high axial vibration 1X RPM dominant if bend is near shaft center 2X RPM dominant if bend is near shaft ends Phase difference in the axial direction will tend towards 1800 difference
Vibration analysis
Mechanical looseness
Caused by structural looseness of machine feet Distortion of the base will cause soft foot problems Phase analysis will reveal aprox 1800 phase shift in the vertical direction between the base plate components of the machine
Caused by loose pillow block bolts Can cause 0.5, 1, 2 and 3X RPM Sometimes caused by cracked frame structure or bearing block
Phase is often unstable Will have many harmonics Can be caused by a loose bearing liner, excessive bearing clearance or a loose impeller on a shaft
Vibration analysis
Sleeve bearing/Rotor rub
Later stages of sleeve bearing wear will give a large family of harmonics of running speed A minor unbalance or misalignment will cause high amplitudes when excessive bearing clearances are present
ROTOR RUB
Truncated waveform
Similar spectrum to mechanical looseness Usually generates a series of frequencies which may excite natural frequencies Sub harmonic frequencies may be present Rub may be partial or through a complete revolution.
oil whirl
Oil whip may occur if a machine is operated at 2X the rotor critical frequency. When the rotor drives up to 2X critical, whirl is close to critical and excessive vibration will stop the oil film from supporting the shaft. Whirl speed will lock onto rotor critical. If the speed is increased the whip frequency will not increase.
Usually occurs at 42 - 48 % of running speed Vibration amplitudes are sometimes severe Whirl is inherently unstable, since it increases centrifugal forces therefore increasing whirl forces
Resonance
RESONANCE
Resonance occurs when the Forcing Frequency coincides with a Natural Frequency 1800 phase change occurs when shaft speed passes through resonance High amplitudes of vibration will be present when a system is in resonance
Often 2X RPM is dominant Amplitudes are normally unsteady, sometimes pulsing with either driver or driven RPM Wear or misalignment in timing belt drives will give high amplitudes at the timing belt frequency Belt frequencies are below the RPM of either the driver or the driven
BELT RESONANCE
High amplitudes can be present if the belt natural frequency coincides with driver or driven RPM Belt natural frequency can be changed by altering the belt tension
If gap between vanes and casing is not equal, Blade Pass Frequency may have high amplitude High BPF may be present if impeller wear ring seizes on shaft Eccentric rotor can cause amplitude at BPF to be excessive
Flow turbulence often occurs in blowers due to variations in pressure or velocity of air in ducts Random low frequency vibration will be generated, possibly in the 50 - 2000 CPM range
HYDRAULIC AERODYNAMIC
CAVITATION
AND FORCES
Cavitations will generate random, high frequency broadband energy superimposed with BPF harmonics Normally indicates inadequate suction pressure Erosion of impeller vanes and pump casings may occur if left unchecked Sounds like gravel passing through pump
BEAT VIBRATION
WIDEBAND SPECTRUM
F1
F2
ZOOM SPECTRUM
A beat is the result of two closely spaced frequencies going into and out of phase The wideband spectrum will show one peak pulsating up and down The difference between the peaks is the beat frequency which itself will be present in the wideband spectrum
Vibration analysis
Electrical
ELECTRICAL PROBLEMS
STATOR ECCENTRICITY, SHORTED LAMINATIONS AND LOOSE IRON
Stator problems generate high amplitudes at 2FL (2X line frequency ) Stator eccentricity produces uneven stationary air gap, vibration is very directional Soft foot can produce an eccentric stator
ELECTRICAL PROBLEMS
SYNCHRONOUS MOTOR
(Loose Stator Coils)
Loose stator coils in synchronous motors generate high amplitude at Coil Pass Frequency The coil pass frequency will be surrounded by 1X RPM sidebands
ELECTRICAL PROBLEMS
POWER SUPPLY PHASE PROBLEMS
(Loose Connector)
Phasing problems can cause excessive vibration at 2FL with 1/3 FL sidebands Levels at 2FL can exceed 25 mm/sec if left uncorrected Particular problem if the defective connector is only occasionally making contact
ELECTRICAL PROBLEMS
ROTOR PROBLEMS
1X, 2X, 3X, RPM with pole pass frequency sidebands indicates rotor bar problems. 2X line frequency sidebands on rotor bar pass frequency (RBPF) indicates loose rotor bars. Often high levels at 2X & 3X rotor bar pass frequency and only low level at 1X rotor bar pass frequency.
Vibration analysis
Gear
20 TEETH
GEARS
NORMAL SPECTRUM
Normal spectrum shows 1X and 2X and gear mesh frequency GMF GMF commonly will have sidebands of running speed All peaks are of low amplitude and no natural frequencies are present
GEARS
TOOTH LOAD
Gear Mesh Frequencies are often sensitive to load High GMF amplitudes do not necessarily indicate a problem Each analysis should be performed with the system at maximum load
GEARS
TOOTH WEAR
Wear is indicated by excitation of natural frequencies along with sidebands of 1X RPM of the bad gear Sidebands are a better wear indicator than the GMF GMF may not change in amplitude when wear occurs
GEARS
GEAR ECCENTRICITY AND BACKLASH
Fairly high amplitude sidebands around GMF suggest eccentricity, backlash or non parallel shafts The problem gear will modulate the sidebands Incorrect backlash normally excites gear natural frequency
GEARS
GEAR MISALIGNMENT
Gear misalignment almost always excites second order or higher harmonics with sidebands of running speed Small amplitude at 1X GMF but higher levels at 2X and 3X GMF Important to set Fmax high enough to capture at least 2X GMF
GEARS
CRACKED / BROKEN TOOTH
TIME WAVEFORM
A cracked or broken tooth will generate a high amplitude at 1X RPM of the gear It will excite the gear natural frequency which will be sidebanded by the running speed fundamental Best detected using the time waveform Time interval between impacts will be the reciprocal of the 1X RPM
GEARS
HUNTING TOOTH fHt = (GMF)Na
(TGEAR)(TPINION)
Vibration is at low frequency and due to this can often be missed Synonymous with a growling sound The effect occurs when the faulty pinion and gear teeth both enter mesh at the same time Faults may be due to faulty manufacture or mishandling
D0 DB D1 BPFI = Nb/2 (1+(Bd/Pd)cos) RPM BPFO = Nb/2 (1-(Bd/Pd)cos) RPM BSF = Pd/2Bd (1-((Bd/Pd)cos)2) RPM FTF = (1-((Bd/Pd)cos)) RPM
Note : shaft turning outer race fixed F = frequency in cpm N = number of balls
ROLLING ELEMENT
BEARINGS STAGE 1 FAILURE MODE
ZONE A
ZONE B
ZONE C
ZONE D
gSE
Earliest indications in the ultrasonic range These frequencies evaluated by Spike EnergyTM gSE, HFD(g) and Shock Pulse Spike Energy may first appear at about 0.25 gSE for this first stage
ROLLING ELEMENT
BEARINGS STAGE 2 FAILURE MODE
Slight defects begin to ring bearing component natural frequencies These frequencies occur in the range of 30k-120k CPM At the end of Stage 2, sideband frequencies appear above and below natural frequency Spike Energy grows e.g. 0.25-0.50gSE
ROLLING ELEMENT
BEARINGS STAGE 3 FAILURE MODE
ZONE A ZONE B ZONE C ZONE D
gSE
Bearing defect frequencies and harmonics appear Many defect frequency harmonics appear with wear the number of sidebands grow Wear is now visible and may extend around the periphery of the bearing Spike Energy increases to between 0.5 -1.0 gSE
Examples
Singing Propeller
Starboard side
0.36
Port side
2.4 2.1
0.30
1.8
RMS V eloc ity in mm/S e c 0.24
1.5
0.18
1.2
0.9
0.12
0.6
0.06
0.3
Singing Propeller
Describing the frequency spectra
Sideband activity around the troubled frequency (140 Hz)
RMS V eloc ity in mm/S e c 2.4 LF PS 1 024 Route Spectrum 28-JUL-06 21:56:44 OVRALL= 2.79 V-DG RMS = 2.76 LOAD = 100.0 RPM = 92. RPS = 1.53 2.1
The modulation/sideband activity tells us that the troubled frequency is working along with the rpm of the shaft. Dfrq (Delta frequency) = 1.534 Hz (*60sec)= 92 RPM 92 rpm = shaft speed when measurements were taken.
1.8
1.5
1.2
0.9
0.6
0.3
0 80 100 120 140 Frequency in Hz 160 180 200 Freq: 142.28 Ordr: 93.24 Spec: .186 Dfrq: 1.534
Singing Propeller
Conclusion
After thorough measurements/analysis our conclusion is that the port side propeller suffers from a phenomenon called a singing propeller. The conclusion is justified by: A frequency of approximately 140 Hz is causing the noise/vibration. This frequency is independent from rpm within the troubled range of propeller revolution (60-105 rpm). The ~140 Hz frequency only appears on the port side propeller shaft. This was confirmed by single propeller transit on both starboard and port side. The ~140 Hz frequency measured has sideband (modulation) which is directly connected to the speed of the port side shaft. This indicates that the troubled frequency is situated somewhere along this shaft. There is no other rpm independent component along port side shaft line that can be a source to this frequency. The size and weight to the propeller can possibly fit to the singing frequency.
Recommendation
Grinding an anti singing edge on the propeller. Result: The grinding of the propeller blades were carried out and the singing tone disappeared
Bearing damage
1.0 F F F F F SF8000.182 645 AKSEL REIMHJUL 1. LAGER RADIELL F F F F F Route Spectrum 10-MAY-05 12: 07: 36 OVRALL= 10.23 V-DG RMS = 1.71 LOAD = 100.0 RPM = 2937. RPS = 48.95 R M S Acceleration in G-s >FAG 6322 F=BPFI : 5.44 0.6 1.0 E E E E E E SF8000.182 645 AKSEL REIMHJUL 1. LAGER RADIELL E E E E Route Spectrum 10-MAY-05 12: 07: 36 OVRALL= 10.23 V-DG RMS = 1.71 LOAD = 100.0 RPM = 2937. RPS = 48.95 >FAG 6322 E=BPFO : 3.56 0.6 0.8 0.8
R M S Acceleration in G-s
0.4
0.4
0.2
0.2
Observing frequencies that matches ball pass frequencies inner race (fault frequencies BPFI) on bearing FAG 6322
Observing frequencies that matches ball pass frequencies outer race (fault frequencies BPFO) on bearing FAG 6322
Bearing damage
5.0 4.5 Trend Display of 1. - 20. kHz 1.0 F OFF ROUTE ORP OFF ROUT E MEASUREMENT POINT DATA F F Route Spectrum 10-MAY-05 12: 09: 49 (Demod-HP 1000 Hz) OVRALL= 1.49 A-DG RMS = 1.50 LOAD = 100.0 RPM = 2937. RPS = 48.95 >FAG 6322 F=BPFI : 5.44 4.0 -- Baseline -Value: 1.143 Date: 26-FEB-03 R M S Acceleration in G-s 0.8 3.5 R M S Acceleration in G-s
3.0
0.6
2.5
2.0
0.4
1.5
1.0
0.2
0.5
0 0 200 400 600 Days: 10-JAN-03 To 10-MAY-05 800 1000 Date: 10-MAY-05 Time: 12: 07: 40 Ampl: 4.281
Label: WF 63 1RER-1 /
Observing powerful increasement in the area 1-20 kHz (which represents the are of bearing noise) This supports the assumption of a bearing damage under development
Also the demodulated measurement indicates fault frequencies from the bearing inner ring on bearing FAG 6322
Bearing damage
Outer ring
2.4 E 2.1 E E SF8000.129 716 AKSEL REIMHJUL 2. LAGER RADIELL E E E E E E E Route Spectrum 01-MAR-05 09:47:29 OVRALL= 15.10 V-DG RMS = 4.14 LOAD = 100.0 RPM = 2622. RPS = 43.70 >SKF NU2224 E=BPFO : 299.6
SF8000.129 716 AKSEL REIMHJUL 2. LAGER RADIELL T rend Display of 1. - 20. kHz
1.5
1.2
0.9
FAULT 2
0.6
ALERT
0.3
0 0 1000 2000 Frequency in Hz 3000 4000 Freq: 300.17 Ordr: 6.869 Spec: .00788
0 0 100 200 300 400 500 Days: 03-FEB-03 T o 01-MAR-05 600 700 800 Date: 01-MAR-05 T ime: 09:47:37 Ampl: 5.531
Observing frequencies that matches ball pass frequencies outer race (fault frequencies BPFO) on bearing SKF NU2224
Observing powerful increasement in the area 1-20 kHz (which represents the are of bearing noise) This supports the assumption of a bearing damage under development
Bearing damage
Outer ring
2.7 E 2.4 E E E G0008 E 003 - GEAR SN: 61.88.6032.01.01 -086 GEAR,INNG.AKS 1.LAGER RADIAL E E E Route Spectrum 06-JUN-05 21:04:14 OVRALL= 21.82 V-DG RMS = 6.58 LOAD =1550.0 RPM = 1505. RPS = 25.09 RM S Acceleration in G-s >T MK HH840210/249 E=BPFO : 256.5 8 G0008 003 - GEAR SN: 61.88.6032.01.01 -086 GEAR,INNG.AKS 1.LAGER RADIAL T rend Display of 1. - 20. kHz 7 -- Baseline -Value: 2.937 Date: 12-MAR-03 2.1 6
RM S Acceleration in G-s
1.8
1.5
1.2
0.9 2 0.6
0.3
0 0 1000 2000 Frequency in Hz 3000 4000 Freq: 255.02 Ordr: 10.17 Spec: .102
0 0 200 400 600 Days: 09-JAN-03 T o 06-JUN-05 800 1000 Date: 06-JUN-05 T ime: 21: 04: 15 Ampl: 6.656
Observing frequencies that matches ball pass frequencies outer race (fault frequencies BPFO) on bearing TMK HH840200 (HH840249/210)
Observing powerful increasement in the area 1-20 kHz (which represents the are of bearing noise) This supports the assumption of a bearing damage under development
Bearing damage
Outer ring (large transmission)
4.0
4.0
3.5
3.5
3.0
2.5
2.5
2.0
ALERT
2.0
ALERT
1.5
1.5
1.0
1.0
0.5
0.5
0 0 200 400 600 800 Days: 09-JAN-02 T o 03-JAN-05 1000 1200 Date: 09-JAN-02 T ime: 11:03:24 Ampl: .340
0 0 200 400 600 800 Days: 09-JAN-02 T o 03-JAN-05 1000 1200 Date: 03-JAN-05 T ime: 14:04:35 Ampl: .551
Observing powerful increasement in the area 1-20 kHz (which represents the are of bearing noise) This supports the assumption of a bearing damage under development
Observing increasement in the area 1-20 kHz (which represents the are of bearing noise) This supports the assumption of a bearing damage under development
Bearing damage
Outer ring (large transmission)
4.0 , T rend Display of 2. - 20. kHz FAULT -- Baseline -Value: .00000 Date: 28-MAY-98 3.5
2.5
2.0
ALERT
1.5
1.0
0.5
0 0 200 400 600 800 Days: 09-JAN-02 T o 03-JAN-05 1000 1200 Date: 09-JAN-02 T ime: 11:03:24 Ampl: .340
Due to earlier observation in this trending tool on this particular shaft, our conclusion is that there is a bearing damage.
Bearing damage
Outer ring (thrust bearing)
2.4 2.1 RMS Acceleration in G-s 1.8 1.5 1.2 0.9 0.6 0.3 0 0 400 800 1200 1600 Frequency in Hz 2000 Freq: 247.50 Ordr: 9.900 Spec: 1.047 E E E E E E E Route Spectrum E 03-NOV-*3 14:37 OVRALL= 18.24 V-DG RMS = 2.30 LOAD = 100.0 RPM = 1500. RPS = 25.00 >SKF NU1026 E=BPFO
12 10 FAULT 8 6 4 2 0 0 ALERT
100 200 300 400 500 600 700 Days: 22-JAN-*2 To 03-NOV-*3
Observing frequencies that matches ball pass frequencies outer race (fault frequencies BPFO) on bearing SKF NU1026
Observing increasement in the area 1-20 kHz (which represents the are of bearing noise) This supports the assumption of a bearing damage under development
Gear damage
Input crown wheel
0.40 0.35 OVRALL= 3.31 V-DG RMS = .4406 LOAD = 100.0 RPM = 278. RPS = 4.63 , Route Spectrum 03-FEB-04 14:37:03
03-FEB-04 14:26:02
0.30
Acceleration in G-s
0.25
0.20
-4 12-SEP-03 11:49:13
0.15
0.10
12-JUN-03 12:04:11
0.05
29-NOV-02 13:34:02
0 0 100 200 300 400 Frequency in Hz 500 600 700 Freq: 25.19 Ordr: 5.437 Spec: .02161
40
80
160
200
240
T ime: Ampl:
32.15 -.906
Time-waveform indicates that there is a pulsation on time per revolution. This supports the assumption of a gear damage. Possible broken tooth.
Gear damage
Intermediate shaft
1.0 0.8 0.6 Acceleration in G-s 0.4 0.2 -0.0 -0.2 -0.4 -0.6 -0.8 -1.0 0 100 200 300 400 Time in mSecs 500 600 Time: 240.57 Ampl: .559 Dtim; 195.61 Freq: 5.112 ,
0.04
Waveform Display 07-OCT-*3 13:16 RMS = .1089 LOAD = 100.0 RPM = 296. RPS = 4.94 PK(+) = .7243 PK(-) = .8067 CRESTF= 7.41
, Route Spectrum 07-OCT-*3 13:20 (Demod- HP 500 Hz) OVRALL= .0701 A-DG RMS = .0700 LOAD = 100.0 RPM = 76. RPS = 1.27
0.03
0.02
0.01
Time-waveform indicates that there is a pulsation on time per revolution. This supports the assumption of a gear damage.
Demodulated measurement shows that there is a harmonic frequency of 5.094 Hz. 5.094 Hz x 60 Hz = ~300 RPM which is close to the intermediate shaft speed. Therefore it is likely to believe that there is a tooth damage on this shaft
Resonance problem
Case On two main gears several tie-/anchor bolts for the pinion bearings on the first gear step broken just after a couple of hundred hours, and therefore Maskindynamikk AS was engaged to identify and analyze the vibration in these two gears. It was soon discovered to be abnormally high levels of vibration in a specific speed-/load area around these bolts (close to maximum speed), and these vibrations were amplified by the gearmesh frequencies of the input shaft. This was the first observation that pointed in the direction of a possible resonance problem Additional examination was therefore carried out to identity this resonance-problem. An element analysis was carried out to sort which of the gear components had natural frequencies in this frequency range (resonant area). This was not a easy case as more than one component could be involved in this. Thru this investigation it was revealed that the bolts had radial natural frequencies which were amplified (excited) by 1st level gearmesh frequency. The resolution to the problem was therefore divided in two. First stage involved redesigning and replacing the bolts with others with lower natural frequencies, and thereafter to change the propeller curve so that we achieve a lower maximum
rpm and a lower maximum gearmesh. In addition to this we also achieved to obtain the power by increasing the pitch curve.
10 BSC - Port-gear-1500hz Port-HF -V05 VERTIKALT Analyze Spectrum 08-SEP-07 00:48:28 RMS = 8.38 LOAD = 73.0 RPM = 1050. RPS = 17.50 18 BSC - Port-gear-1500hz Port-HF -V05 VERTIKALT Analyze Spectrum 08-SEP-07 01:00:27 RMS = 23.05 LOAD = 80.0 RPM = 1080. RPS = 18.00 16
14
12
10
4 2 2
0 0 400 800 Frequency in Hz 1200 1600 Freq: 716.90 Ordr: 40.97 Spec: 6.594
0 0 400 800 Frequency in Hz 1200 1600 Freq: 735.77 Ordr: 40.88 Spec: 13.37
The two engines is running at 1060 rpm which gives a gearmesh of 718 Hz with a amplitude of 6.7 mm/s. This is normal
The two engines is running at 1080 rpm which gives a gearmesh of 736 Hz with a amplitude of 13.4 mm/s. An 2.5% increasement on the gearmesh frequency doubles the amplitude, and this clearly indicates a resonance problem
33 30 27
BSC - Port-gear-1500hz Port-HF -V05 VERTIKALT Analyze Spectrum 08-SEP-07 01:41:06 RMS = 29.24 LOAD = 86.0 RPM = 1100. RPS = 18.33
0.7
BSC - Port-gear-1500hz Port-HF -V05 VERTIKALT Analyze Spectrum 16-SEP-07 10:04:08 RMS = 2.59 LOAD = 15.0 RPM = 600. RPS = 10.00
0.6
0.5
0.4
18 15
72 2.55
0.3
12 9 0.2
6 0.1 3
0 0 400 800 1200 Frequency in Hz 1600 2000 Freq: 753.53 Ordr: 41.10 Spec: 26.38
0 0 200 400 600 Frequency in Hz 800 1000 1200 Freq: 837.00 Ordr: 83.70 Spec: .220
The two engines is running at 1100 rpm which gives a gearmesh of 753 Hz with a amplitude of 26.4 mm/s. An 5.8% increasement on the gearmesh frequency increases the amplitude four times, and this definitely indicates a resonance problem
The two engines is running at low and variable rpm with 1st order gearmesh around 350-400 Hz. This gives a 2nd order gearmesh frequency in the are 700-850 Hz. Also the 2nd order is strongly amplified something which confirms our assumption. This proves that there is a resonance problem in this area (700-800Hz)
The measurement technique which were used her is called rpm sweeping with peak-hold function which means that you sweep a frequency area to map possible resonance problems
83 6.46
Initial vibration analysis revealed mechanical unbalance in the coupling. Unbalance is indicated by a dominating 1.st order frequency amplitude. Unbalance can have different reasons
Insuficcient dynamic balancing. Coupling damages, as here where the stress between the rubber elements and the inner ring (steel) has excedeeded the force limits and the rubber elements were damaged after only a few months
80
120 Frequency in Hz
160
200
The outer steel ring of the coupling was turned 180 degrees vs. the rubber elements - wich in this case was the rebalancing trick to reduce the 1.st order vibration levels from 18 to 4 mm/s
10
Gen 2
035 - GENERATOR 2 -P05 GENERATOR, DE,VERTIKAL Route Spectrum 28-SEP-07 10:54:16 OVRALL= 10.82 V-DG RMS = 10.49 LOAD = 100.0 RPM = 1801. RPS = 30.01
0 0 40 80 120 Frequency in Hz 160 200 Freq: Ordr: Spec: 30.00 1.000 4.018