Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
OUTLINE
BACKGROUND DESCRIPTION OF BMA STRATEGIC ISSUES OF BMA SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT POLICY IN BANDUNG CITY
BACKGROUND
consequences
Based on Govt Regulation No.26/2008 Bandung M etropolitan Area (BMA) is : National Activity Center (Pusat Kegiatan Nasional) National Strategic Area (Kawasan Strategis Nasional) Provision of regional infrastructure Spatial Planning
BMA has a significant role as : national center of activities Regional and national scale economic growth pole
THE PROFILE OF
Total Area 343.267 Ha, consist of : Bandung City (16.729,65 Ha) Cimahi City (4.023 Ha) Bandung and West Bandung Regency (307.389 Ha) Part of Sumedang Regency (15.486 Ha)
Demography
Total Population 6.893.009 people Density 20 people/hectare Population Growth 2,86%
R ON G GA
WA DUK CI RA T A
C I K ALO N G WETAN
%
C I PEU ND EU Y
%
S Ci . beu re um
C I SAR U A
%
CI PA TAT PAR O NG PO N G
LEM BAN G
ka pun dung S . Ci
%
PAD ALAR AN G
N G AM PR AH
SU K ASA R I
% %
B ATU JAJA R
KOTA CI M AHI
C IM EN YA N
CI LEN G KR AN G
KOTA BANDUNG
C I LEU N YI
%
C I PO N G KO R
JATI N AN GO R
WA DU K S A GULI % N G
CI LI LI N
M AR G AASI H M AR G AH A YU D AYEU H KO LO T
KABUPATEN SUMEDANG
% CI M AN GG UN G
k S . Ci ar i t
%
BO JO NG SO AN G R AN C AE KEK
G. K e rn c
%
SO R E AN G KA TAPAN G
C IC ALEN G KA
S. i t C a um r
%
P AM EU N G PEU K
SO L O KAN JER U K
% %
%
C I P AR AY
C S.
r t a i
k i
BALEEN D AH
C I KAN CU N G
%
GU N UN GH ALU SN I D AN G KER TA
N AG R EG
% % %
AR JAS AR I M AJALA YA
% % PASE H
%
BAN JA R AN
Ci wi S.
ey d
%
PAS I R JA M BU
%
C IM AU N G
BU I N
KABUPATENB ANDUNG
%
PAC ET
Hu l u
C IW ID EY
kuy ang Ci s S.
Band ung Metrop olitan Area Band ung City Bandung & West Bandung Regency Cimahi City Tanjungsari Cimanggu ng Jatinangor Total
R AN C ABA LI
%
PAN G AL EN G AN
KER TA SAR I
G . P at u ha
105 16 16 32 20
G . M aa l ba r
Ci .
ar t m u
Cipeu nde uy
W ADUKCI RATA
I KL C A ON G WE A TN
G. a Tn g k uba n Pa r a hu
%
CI P E UND E UY
1994
E MB A L NG
%
I SR C A UA
I PT C AAT
Padalar an g
PAD AL AR A NG
Lem ban g
PA R ON GP ON G
% %
%
G A MP R A N H
%
I ME C NY A N
SU KASAR I
%
A T UJ B AJ AR
%
CI LE N GK R A NG
KO TA CI M A HI
Jatin an gor
% %
J AT I NA N GOR
CI L E UNY I
%
MA R GA A I SH MA R GA H A Y U
RO N GGA
CP I ON GK OR
W ADUKSAG L UI NG
DA Y E U H K OL OT
Rancae kek
OJ ON B GSOANG
%
RA N CA E K EK
G. Kr ence ng
CI CA L E N GK A S OL OK A NJ E R UK
S OR E A NG
KA T APN AG
% %
GU N U N GH A L U SI NDA N GK E R T A
%
CI PAR AY
%
CI KAN CUNG N A GR EG
Banjar an
P A ME U N GP E U K
BAL E NDAH
% % %
PA SEH
Sor eang
% % %
I WI C DE Y PAS I RJ A MB U
%
BAN J A RA N
RJ A A S A RI
Majala ya
P A CE T
MA J AL AYA
G. Ma ndaa l w angi
%
I U BN
MA U N G CI
RA NCA BAL I
2004
Pangale ng an
PA N GA L E N GA N
E RT A K S A RI
G. Pa t uha
G. Ma a l bar
W ADUK CI RA TA
CI KA L O N G WE A TN
CI PE UNDE UY
Cipeu nde uy
% %
I A C PTAT
$
CI SA RUA
2001
%
E MB N L AG SUK ASAI R
%
PA R ON GP ON G
PADA L AR ANG
%
BA T UJ AJ AR
KO TAC I M A HI
CI ME N Y A N
CI LE N GK R A NG
ANJ T U N GS ARI
RO N GGA
CI P OG N K OR
W ADUK SAGUL I NG
%
MA R G AASH I
KOTA BAND UNG gor Bandu ng -Cim ahi Jatin an KABU PATENS UM EDA NG
CI L EU NYI
ATN J I A N GOR
I MN C A GGU N G
Cililin
CI LI LN S OR E ANG
MA R GA H Y AU
DA YEUH K OO LT
. Kr G enc eng
% %
OJ N B O GS OA NG
Rancae kek
S OO L KANE J RU K
RANC AEE KK
$
%
NA GR E G
I A C CL E N GK A
KAT APN AG
%
PAE MU N G PEUK
% %
GU N U N GH A L U I D S N A N GK ERT A
AL B E E ND AH
%
CI PARA Y
%
CI KA NCUN G
Banjar an
%
% % %
AJ L M AAY A
% %
PA SEH
Sor eang
%
PASR I J A MB U I WI C DE Y
BA NJ AR AN
ARJ ASAI R
Majala ya
%
BUN I
G. Ma n d a l wa n gi
%
CI MA U N G
ANCA R BAL I
%
PA N GA L E N GA N
Pangale ng an
%
KERT ASA RI
G. P a t uh a
G. Ma a l b ar
ECONOMY
Regional Trading of Bandung Metropolitan Area (Flow of goods from Bandung Metropolitan Area)
DKI 5,3 % Banten 4,76 %
Jabar 34,57 %
3,53 %
34,57 %
40,4 %
ENVIRONMENT
Location of Industries IPAL terpadu : Very Poor (DO < 2 ppm) : Poor (2<DO<3 ppm) : Good (DO>3 ppm)
Subang
Cianjur Banjaran
Majalaya
Gn Waya ng
Garut
$
be um ur e S . Ci
%
C I SAR UA
%
CI P ATAT PA R O NG PO NG
%
ung nd
LE M BA N G
% %
PAD ALAR AN G N G AM PR AH
% %
u ka p S . Ci
SU KAS AR I
% %
BAT U JAJA R
KOTA C M I AHI
C I M EN Y AN
C I LEN G KR AN G
WA DUK SAGU L I NG
R ON GG A C I PO N G KO R
%
M AR G A ASI H M AR G AH AYU
JAT N IA N GO R
CI LI LI N
D A YEU H KO LO T
B OJO NG SO AN G %
SO R EA N G K ATA PAN G
R AN C A EKE K
%
PAM EU N G PEU K
a t . Ci
um r
SO LO KAN JER U K
% %
GU NU N G H ALU
%
CI PA R AY
B A LE E ND AH
% %
AR JAS AR I
W astewater Treatment Facilit y : IPAL Bojongsoang, the capacit y is 80.835 m2/day, served people of Bandung City and Bandung Regency. KABUPA T EN S UM EDAN G IPLT Cibeet, the capacit y is 25 m 2/day, $ served part p art of Bandung Regency.
% TA N JU N G SAR I
I M AN GG UN G % C
G . K renc eng
k ri t a S . Ci
C IC A LEN G KA
S i . C
i k ar t
C I K AN CU NG
N AG R EG
%
SI ND AN G KER TA
%
M A JALA YA
% PA SEH
BAN JAR AN
G . M a nda a l w ang i
%
%
S dey i w . Ci
%
C IM AU N G
BU N I
KABUPA T EN B ANDU NG
%
PAC ET
l Hu u
P ASI R JAM BU
C I WI D EY
R AN C A BAL I
%
PA N G A LEN G AN
S.
a t Ci
um r
Total flood risk are a in BMA ar e 14.480 ha Regional Dr aina ge System has not been $ established
G. P at uha
. Ci s S ng a ku y
%
K ER T ASAR I
G. Mal aba r
Waste Disposal Level of Services : Bandung Regency 23% Bandung City 60% Sumedang Regency 96%
STRATEGIC ISSUES OF
FAST GROWING NEEDS OF URBAN INFRASTRUCTURE DEGRADATION OF EN VIRON MENT QUALITY LAND CONVERSION INTO BUILT UP AREA
ENVIRONMENT AL PROGRAM IN
Bandung City
1,000 23
2,000
3,000
4,000
Kabupaten Bandung
Kota Bandung
37
60
Kabupaten Sumedang
Kabupaten G arut
Kabupaten Subang
96 67 86 84
Kabupaten Purwakarta
78
Kabupaten Bogor
Kota Bogor
67
Kabupaten Bek as i
45
Kota Bekas i
43
Kota Depok
45
Current Condition
Kabupaten Karawang
49 62
Bandung City
Regency/City
85 27 64
72
Kabupaten Ciamis
37
Kabupaten Cirebon
13
Kota Cirebon
86
39
22
Kabupaten Kuningan
28
Kota Banjar
19
Current Condition
The type of formal institution SWM in West Java
Section -District Service. 1. 4% Lo cal Co mp any . 1. 4% (BANDUNG CITY) Sanitation Office. 3. 13%
The type of formal instit ution that r un soli d waste ma nageme nt in a certain city will has significa nt infl uence on the SW M performa nce The l ow Level Of Services i n Bandung Solid Waste Ma nageme nt caused by the still under-dev eloped & ne ed assistance (subsi dy) from the l ocal gover nment to cove r overa ll operational costs
Current Condition
Final D isposal Site System in West Java
s anitar y landfil l, 4 ( 8%)
op en dumping, 29 (6 1%)
ACTUALLY: Most of FDS i n West Java Provi nce can be classified as dumpfills, with less tha n 10% achieving status of contr olled landfill. No sanitary landfill is in e xistence alt hough there is some being planned.
Current Condition
Existing SWM Operation
MANAGED BY RW OR DISTRICT SERRVICE
WASTE VOLUM E
Publ c i hous e RESIDENTIAL
TS
S O U R C E
MARKET
WASTE VOLUM E
WASTE VOLUM E
CONTAINER
FDS
DUSTBIN
Solid was te collection to transfer s tation is managed by community Solid was te transportation, p rocessing and f inal d umping a re the respons ibility of the ope rators.
Current Condition
Communities Involvement
the community a ltoget her carrie d out the solid w as manageme nt inde pendently
10
Current Condition
Land Landslid slides es in in Leuwig Leuwigajah ajah FDS FDS Feb February ruary 21, 21, 2005 2005
FDS rrBandu ng tty FDSfo fo Bandu ngCi Ci y tempo rary Jelekon g tempo rary move move to to Jelekon gFDS FDS JELEKONG JELEKONGFDS FDS
Current Condition
The Problem
JELEKONG FDS:
Capacity : 300.000 m3 Lifetime : Until Desember 2005
very difficult to find ne w FDS areas because the public impression and perce ption of FDS has been l argely ne gative
11
Current Condition
Expenditure on Solid Waste Management Year 2003 in Bandung City
Administrastion: 6,34 M (31,5%) Dumping: 1.11 M (5,5%) Collecting : 5,45 M (27 %)
The cost inv olved in processing t he v olume of w aste at the FDS is very small the solid waste ope rators put the F DS ma nageme nt at the end priority
2,00
1, 80
1,97 %
Subsidy 0,44 % of APBD
1, 60 1, 40 1, 20
50
40 30 20 10
1,00
0, 80 0, 60 0, 40 0, 20
Budget a llocation from APBD (Annual City De velopment Budget) for solid waste manageme nt is lowest compare d to ot her development are a. Local gover nment put t he solid waste mana gement at t he l owest priority.
12
Environmental Pollution
Environmental Pollution around FDS
Air Pollution
Environmental Pollution
Environmental Sanitation around FDS
slums settlement of scavenger pond of leachate & many flies
13
Environmental Pollution
Flood
Environmental Pollution
14
15
E X I S T I N G
F U T U R E
16
To endorse local government in order to begin with shift of solid waste management paradigm to a reduction paradigm. To make an informal sector of recycling organizers as working partner by opening the business opportunity for them.
17
Increasing capacity and competency of formal solid waste institution. Increasing professionalism of institution. Developing the financial system to increase the institution competency.
18
To establish a regional cooperation in carrying out the operation of solid waste management. To carry out the institutional function of environment quality observation around FDS.
19
20
Conclusion
The environment pollution caused by solid waste management activity in Bandung City reveals that the core of the problem is caused by collect-transportdump paradigm Shifting paradigm in solid waste management policy should be taken, where the collect-transport-dump paradigm is changed into solid waste minimization paradigm Final Disposal S ite should be developed through the mechanism of inter town cooperation Generate and develop an active participation of the communit y in solid waste management
THE END
Thank you for your kind attention
21