Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Copyright 20042012 Xilinx, Inc. Xilinx, the Xilinx logo, Artix, ISE, Kintex, Spartan, Virtex, Zynq, and other designated brands included herein are trademarks of Xilinx in the United States and other countries. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. Notice of Disclaimer The information disclosed to you hereunder (the Materials) is provided solely for the selection and use of Xilinx products. To the maximum extent permitted by applicable law: (1) Materials are made available "AS IS" and with all faults, Xilinx hereby DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES AND CONDITIONS, EXPRESS, IMPLIED, OR STATUTORY, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, NON-INFRINGEMENT, OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE; and (2) Xilinx shall not be liable (whether in contract or tort, including negligence, or under any other theory of liability) for any loss or damage of any kind or nature related to, arising under, or in connection with, the Materials (including your use of the Materials), including for any direct, indirect, special, incidental, or consequential loss or damage (including loss of data, profits, goodwill, or any type of loss or damage suffered as a result of any action brought by a third party) even if such damage or loss was reasonably foreseeable or Xilinx had been advised of the possibility of the same. Xilinx assumes no obligation to correct any errors contained in the Materials or to notify you of updates to the Materials or to product specifications. You may not reproduce, modify, distribute, or publicly display the Materials without prior written consent. Certain products are subject to the terms and conditions of the Limited Warranties which can be viewed at http://www.xilinx.com/warranty.htm; IP cores may be subject to warranty and support terms contained in a license issued to you by Xilinx. Xilinx products are not designed or intended to be failsafe or for use in any application requiring fail-safe performance; you assume sole risk and liability for use of Xilinx products in Critical Applications: http://www.xilinx.com/warranty.htm#critapps.
Reliability Report
www.xilinx.com
Revision History
The following table shows the revision history for this document.
Date 02/09/04 05/10/04 05/24/04 05/24/04 08/18/04 01/04/05 03/01/05 05/20/05 08/19/05 11/17/05 02/24/06 05/05/06 06/20/06 08/11/06 08/29/06 10/06/06 12/01/06 02/12/07 02/20/07 03/28/07 06/04/07 08/24/07 09/18/07 10/31/07 02/06/08 07/07/08 08/15/08 11/14/08 02/11/09 Version 1.0 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.8 2.9 3.0 3.0.1 3.1 3.1.1 3.1.2 3.2 3.3 3.3.1 3.3.2 4.0 4.1 4.1.1 4.2 4.3 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.3 Initial release in new template. First quarter 2004 revision. Changed fit rate on page 7 for 0.5 m from 89 to 8. Changes to Tables 1-1, 2-1, 2-15, 3-44, 3-46, 3-48, 3-50, and 3-52; also a heading on page 75. Added second quarter data. Added third quarter data. Changes in most tables to show the fourth-quarter test values. Removed packaging information from Chapter 1 and added a reference to the packaging website. Data corrections in tables 2-61 and 3-32. Changes in most tables to show the second-quarter test values. Updates most tables to include the third-quarter test data. Most tables updated to reflect the fourth-quarter test data. Changes in most tables to show the first-quarter test data. Corrected two transposed figures in Table 1-10. Changes in most tables to show the second-quarter test data. Changed typos in tables 2-91, 3-44, and 3-55. Corrected values in tables 1-12, 2-87, 2-90, and 2-91. Changes in most tables to show the third-quarter test data. Changes in most tables to show the fourth-quarter test data. Correct typos in three tables. Correct typos in four tables. Changes in most tables to show the first-quarter test data. Changes in most tables to show the second-quarter test data. Corrected omission in this history table. Changes in most tables to show the third-quarter test data. Changes in most tables to show the fourth-quarter test data. Changes in most tables to show the first-quarter test data. Changes in most tables to show the second-quarter test data. Changes in most tables to show the third-quarter test data. Updated legal disclaimer. Changes in most tables to show the fourth-quarter test data. Added single event upset and soft error rate data. See Table 1-17, page 23. Revision
www.xilinx.com
Reliability Report
Date 05/07/09 06/15/09 08/03/09 10/27/09 03/15/10 05/04/10 08/10/10 11/01/10 02/01/11 05/09/11 06/17/11 08/02/11 11/07/11
Version 5.4 5.5 5.6 5.7 5.8 5.9 5.10 5.11 5.12 6.0 6.0.1 7.0 8.0
Revision Changes in most tables to show the first-quarter, 2009 test data. Added second paragraph to SEU and Soft Error Rate Measurements, page 23. Added SF363 (Lot 2) data to Table 3-77, page 111. Replaced Figure 3-1, page 112, Figure 3-2, page 112, and Figure 3-3, page 113. Revised FFG1704 data in Table 3-79, page 117 Changes in most tables to show the second-quarter, 2009 test data. Added alpha particle FIT/Mb data for Spartan-6 and Virtex-6 FPGAs to Table 1-17, page 23. Most tables updated to include third-quarter, 2009 test data. Changes in most tables to show the fourth-quarter, 2009 test data. Changes in most tables to show the first-quarter, 2010 test data. Changes in most tables to show the second-quarter, 2010 test data. Changes in most tables to show the third-quarter, 2010 test data. Changes in most tables to show the fourth-quarter, 2010 test data. Changes in most tables to show the first-quarter, 2011 test data. Revised last sentence in SEU and Soft Error Rate Measurements for clarity. Changes in most tables to show the second-quarter, 2011 test data. Changes in most tables to show the third-quarter, 2011 test data. Chapter 1, The Reliability Program: Updated Acceptance Criteria and added note 3 to Table 1-3. Chapter 2, Results by Product Family: Added XCV600E to Table 2-12. Added XC2VP7 to and deleted XC2VP80 from Table 2-15. Deleted XC3S2000 from Table 2-18. Deleted XC4VLX15 from Table 2-24. Added XC6VLX130T to Table 2-28. Added XC4VLX80 to Table 2-45. Added XC2V6000 to Table 2-81. Deleted XC4VFX100 and XC4VLX85T from Table 2-89. Added XC5VLX330T device to Table 2-90. Added XC6VLX195T device to Table 2-91. Added XC6SLX25T to Table 2-104. Added XCV100 to Table 2-128. Added XC6SLX16 to Table 2-141. Added XC4VLX80 to Table 2-142. Deleted XC17S150XL from Table 2-152. Deleted XCF128X from Table 2-154. Deleted XC17S30XL from Table 2-158. Deleted XCF01S, XCF04S, XCF08P, and XCF128X from Table 2-161. Deleted XC17S30XL from Table 2-170. Deleted XC17V16 from Table 2-171. Deleted XC17S30XL from Table 2-176. Deleted XC17V16 from Table 2-177. Deleted XCF01S, XCF04S, XCF08P, and XCF128X from Table 2-179. Deleted XC95216 from Table 2-181. Added XCR3256XL and deleted XCR384XL and XCR3512XL from Table 2-199. Added XCR3256XL and deleted XCR384XL and XCR3512XL from Table 2-208. Added XCR3256XL and deleted XCR3128XL XCR3512XL from Table 2-220. Chapter 3, Results by Package Type: Added HASTU to Table 3-11. Deleted HTS from Table 3-12. Deleted HASTU from Table 3-15. Deleted Temperature cycling 40 to +125C row from Table 3-26. Added HASTU to Table 3-29. Added HTS to Table 3-43. Added HAST to Table 3-47. Added Temperature cycling -55 to +125C row and HTS to Table 3-49. Added HTS to Table 3-66. Added Temperature humidity 85C, 85% RH with bias row to Table 3-75.
Reliability Report
www.xilinx.com
Date 01/27/12
Version 8.1
Revision Updated Notice of Disclaimer. Changes in most tables to show the fourth-quarter, 2011 test data. Chapter 1, The Reliability Program: Added XCE6VxXxxx to Table 1-7. Added XC5VSX240T to Table 1-12. Chapter 2, Results by Product Family: Added XCE6VxXxxx to Table 2-1. Deleted XC2S150 from Table 2-8. Added XCV100 to Table 2-9. Added XC6SLX45 and XC6SLX100 to and deleted XC6SLX16 from Table 2-23. Added XC4VLX160 and XC4VFX12 and modified Note 1 in Table 2-24. Added Note 1 to Table 2-25 and Table 2-26. Inserted new table: Table 2-29. Added XC5VLX85T to table Table 2-46. Added XC6VLX365T to Table 2-47. Added XCS20XL to and deleted XCS10XL from Table 2-74. Added XC3S200AN to Table 2-87. Added XC6SLX4 to Table 2-88. Added XC2S100E to and deleted XC2S400E from Table 2-97. Added XCS20XL and XCSxxxX to Table 2-109. Added XC6SLX4 and XC6SLX9 to Table 2-121. Deleted XCR3064XL from Table 2-184. Added XC2C64 to Table 2-200. Added XCR3128XL to Table 2-220. Added XC2C64 to Table 2-221. Chapter 3, Results by Package Type: Added HTS to Table 3-3 and Table 3-47. Added HAST to Table 3-56.
05/08/12
9.0
Changes in many tables to show the first-quarter, 2012 test data. Added Xilinx 7 series FPGAs.
www.xilinx.com
Reliability Report
Reliability Report
www.xilinx.com
Table of Contents
Revision History . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
Product Qualification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
Wafer Process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
Process Technology Family . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ESD and Latch-up Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Failure Rate Determination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Failure Rate Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . SEU and Soft Error Rate Measurements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
15 16 21 22 23
www.xilinx.com
CPLD Products . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74
www.xilinx.com
www.xilinx.com
FGG400 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . FGG324, FGG456, and FGG484 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . FGG676 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . FGG680 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . FGG900 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . FGG1156 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . FTG256 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PQG160, PQG208 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . HQG240, HQG208 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PCG44, PCG84 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . SOG20 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . VQG44, VQG64, VQG100 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . VOG20, VOG48 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TQG100, TQG144 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . FFG668 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . FFG484, FFG784 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . FFG1136, FFG1148, FFG1152 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . FFG1759, FFG1760 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . FFG1156 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . FFG1923 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . FFG1513, FFG1517 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . FFG1704 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . FFG324 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . FFG900 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . FFG1738 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . SFG363 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
102 102 103 103 103 104 104 104 105 105 105 105 106 106 106 107 107 107 107 108 108 108 108 109 109 109
10
www.xilinx.com
Chapter 1
Product Qualification
Wafer Process
The reliability tests used for wafer process qualification are summarized in Table 1-1. Table 1-1: Wafer Process Qualification Tests
Reliability Test Conditions Duration Lot Quantity Sample Size Acceptance per Lot Criteria
TJ > 125C, VDD Max 85C, 85% RH, VDD 130C, 85% RH, VDD
110C, 85% RH, VDD
77
25
0 failures
www.xilinx.com
11
Table 1-1:
1,000 hours 96 hours 264 hours 500 cycles 1,000 cycles 1,000 cycles 1,000 hours 10,000 cycles 3 1 25 32 0 failures 0 failures 3 25 0 failures 3 25 0 failures
TA = 150C TA = 25C
Notes: 1. Phase I production is released as the qualification data demonstrates, meeting the required 200 FIT failure rate and other test
requirements. 2. Phase II production is released as the qualification data demonstrates, meeting the required 50 FIT failure rate and other test requirements. 3. Package preconditioning is performed prior to THB, HAST, temperature cycling, TH, and HASTU tests. 4. For plastic QFP packages: 65C to +150C and 500 cycles or 55C to +125C and 1,000 cycles. 5. For plastic BGA packages: 55C to +125C and 1,000 cycles. 6. For flip chip packages: 55C to +125C and 1,000 cycles or 40C to +125C and 1,000 cycles. 7. For CPLD and EPROM products. 8. This is not a mandatory test and only for CPLD and EPROM products.
Package/Assembly
The non-hermetic package/assembly qualification is outlined in Table 1-2. However, for hermetic package qualification, a full group B and D test per MIL-STD-833, Test Methods, is required. Table 1-2: Non-Hermetic Package/Assembly Qualification
Reliability Test Conditions 85C, 85% RH, VDD 130C, 85% RH, VDD 110C, 85% RH, VDD Duration 1,000 hours 96 hours 264 hours 3 25 0 failures Lot Quantity Sample Acceptance Size Criteria per Lot
THB(1) or HAST(1)
12
www.xilinx.com
Table 1-2:
Temperature cycling(1,2,3,4)
121C, 100% RH 85C, 85% R.H 130C, 85% RH or 110C, 85% RH TA=150C
Package preconditioning is performed prior to THB, HAST, temperature cycling, autoclave, TH, and HASTU tests. For plastic BGA packages: 55C to +125C and 1,000 cycles. For flip chip packages: 55C to +125C and 1,000 cycles or 40C to +125C and 1,000 cycles. For plastic QFP packages: 65C to +150C and 500 cycles or 55C to +125C and 1,000 cycles.
Device
The qualification process for new devices is shown in Table 1-3. Table 1-3:
Reliability Test ESD ESD Latch-up Notes:
1. HBM = Human Body Model 2. CDM = Charge Device Model 3. GT transceiver CDM level is specified per JEP157
Device Qualification
Conditions HBM(1) CDM(2) Current injection Lot Quantity 1 1 1 Sample Size per Lot 3 3 3 Acceptance Criteria 1,000V 250V(3) 200 mA
www.xilinx.com
13
monitored every quarter regardless of the FIT rate. Mature processes older than four years are monitored based on the FIT Rate. Table 1-4 summarizes the classification criteria and monitoring frequency for both classes. Table 1-4: Monitoring Process Classes
Class 1 Process Age < 4 years Classification Criteria or FIT > 26 (for FPGAs) FIT > 55 (for Flash PROM) 4 times per year Class 2 Process Age > 4 years and FIT < 26 (for FPGAs) FIT < 55 (for Flash PROMs) 2 times per year
Monitor Frequency
The reliability tests used to monitor the wafer process are shown in Table 1-5. Table 1-5: Tests Used to Monitor Wafer Processes
Reliability Test HTOL Data Retention Bake(1) Note:
1. For CPLD and PROM products.
Lot Quantity 1 1
Package/Assembly
The package reliability monitor program takes into consideration the following factors: Package construction (wire-bond lead frame, wire-bond BGA, or flip chip) Factory location (assembly site, or wafer fabrication site) Substrate vendor Die size Technology maturity Past history
Based on these factors and availability, representative packages are drawn from inventory for the stress tests defined in Table 1-6. These tests are typically conducted on a quarterly basis, but the number of tests can be reduced or eliminated based on the maturity of the package technology, understanding of failure mechanisms, and their dependency on the stress test. Table 1-6: Tests Used by the Reliability Package Monitor Program
Reliability Test THB(1) or HAST(1) Stress Conditions 85C, 85% RH, VDD 130C, 85% RH, VDD 110C, 85% RH, VDD Stress Duration 1,000 hrs 96 hrs 264 hrs 45 Sample Size Frequency WBLF(2) Every Even Quarter WBBGA(3) Every Odd Quarter Flip Chip(4) Every Quarter
14
www.xilinx.com
Table 1-6:
Temperature cycling(1, 5)
Autoclave(1, 6) or
55C to +125C or 40C to +125C 121C, 100% RH 85C, 85% RH 130C, 85% RH or 110C, 85% RH TA=150C
1,000 cycles
45
WBLF Every Quarter WBBGA Every Quarter Flip Chip Every Quarter
96 hrs 1,000 hrs 96 hrs or 264 hrs 1,000 hrs 45 WBLF Every Quarter WBBGA Every Quarter 45 WBLF Every Odd Quarter WBBGA Every Even Quarter
Package preconditioning is performed prior to THB, HAST, temperature cycling, autoclave, TH, and HASTU tests. For matured WBLF packages (PLCCs, SOICs, and DIPs packages), reliability monitoring is performed once a year. For matured WBBGA packages (S-BGA Cavity-down BGA), reliability monitoring is performed once a year. For flip chip packages, THB testing is performed every quarter and replaces the need for temperature humidity testing. For plastic QFP and BGA packages: 55C to +125C and 1,000 cycles; for flip chip packages: 55C to +125C and 1,000 cycles or 40C/+125C and 1,000 cycles. 6. Refer to the device-specific qualification report for complete autoclave, temperature humidity, and HASTU reliability test data. 7. HTS stress is not applicable with flip chip package because the technology has no wire-bond IMC interface degradation.
0.045 m
0.065 m 0.09 m 0.13 m 0.15 m 0.15 m 0.18 m/0.15 m 0.18 m 0.22 m/0.18 m 0.22 m 0.25 m
www.xilinx.com
15
Table 1-7:
XC17xxxD/L XC17xxxE, XC17Sxxx XC17Vxxx XC18Vxxx XC31xxx/A XC3xxx/A XC4xxx/A XC4xxxE XC4xxxEX XC4xxxXL XC4xxxXLA XCVxxx
16
www.xilinx.com
Table 1-8:
XCVxxxE/XC2SxxxE XCSxxx XCSxxxXL XC2Sxxx XC5xxx XC95xxx XC95xxxXL XC95xxxXV XCRxxxL XC2Vxxx XC2Cxxx XC3Sxxx XC3SxxxE XC3SxxxA XC3SxxxAN XC3SDxxxA XC18Vxxx(ST) XCFxxxS/P
Notes:
+2,000V to +3,000V +6,000V +3,000V +2,000V +3,000V to +7,000V +2,000V to +3,000V +2,000V to +3,000V +2,000V to +3,000V +2,000V to +3,000V +750V to 2,000V(23) +2,000V +2,000V +2,000V +2,000V +2,000V +2,000V +2,000V +2,000V
1. Measured on XC1765D. 2. Measured on XC17256E. 3. Measured on XC18V04. 4. Measured on XC3190/A. 5. Measured on XC3090. 6. Measured on XC4005. 7. Measured on XC4005E. 8. Measured on XC4010E. 9. Measured on XC4028XL. 10. Measured on XC4062XLA. 11. Measured on XCV800. 12. Only XCV100E and XCV812E have ESD threshold below 2KV, (XCV100E passed at 1.5KV and XCV812E passed at 1KV) 13. Measured on XCV50E. 14. Measured on XCV2600 (shrink) and XCV3200 (shrink).
15. Measured on XCS10 and XCS30. 16. Measured on XCS30XL. 17. Measured on XC2S200. 18. Measured on XC5210. 19. Measured on XC95108. 20. Measured on XC9536XL. 21. Measured on XC95288XV. 22. Measured on XCR3064XL. 23. Human body model data collected on XC2V40, XC2V80, XC2V250, XC2V500, XC2V1000, XC2V1500, XC2V2000, XC2V3000, XC2V4000, XC2V6000, and XC2V8000. Using the human body model, these devices have a threshold below 2KV: The XC2V40 passes at 1.75KV. The XC2V4000 (from UMC 8D) passes at 1.5KV. The XC2V500 pass at 750V. Results do not include DXN and DXP temperature sensing pins. Results do not include VBATT pins for XC2VxxxX devices.
www.xilinx.com
17
The ESD results in Table 1-9 do not include DXN and DXP temperature sensing pins. Table 1-9: ESD and Latch-up Data for XC2VPxxx
Human Body Model Passing Voltage Device Latch-up 200 mA Regular I/O and Power MGT Charge Device Model Passing Voltage Regular I/O and Power MGT
XC2VP2 XC2VP4 XC2VP7 XC2VP20 XC2VP30 XC2VP40 XC2VP50 XC2VP70 XC2VP100 XC2VPX20
Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass
+1,500V +2,000V +2,000V +2,000V +2,000V +2,000V +2,000V +2,000V +2,000V +2,000V
+2,000V +1,500V +1,000V +2,000V +2,000V +2,000V +2,000V +2,000V +1,000V +1,500V
+500V +500V +500V +500V +500V +500V +500V +500V +500V +400V
+300V +300V +500V +300V +300V +300V +300V +300V +300V +200V
Table 1-10:
Table 1-11:
18
www.xilinx.com
Table 1-11:
Table 1-12: ESD and Latch-up Data for XC5VxXxxx/T Human Body Model Passing Voltage Device XC5VLX20T XC5VLX30 XC5VLX30T XC5VLX50 XC5VLX50T XC5VLX85 XC5VLX85T XC5VLX110 XC5VLX110T XC5VLX155 XC5VLX155T XC5VLX220 XC5VLX220T XC5VLX330 XC5VLX330T XC5VFX30T XC5VFX70T XC5VFX100T XC5VFX130T XC5VFX200T XC5VSX35T XC5VSX50T XC5VSX95T Latch-up pass pass pass pass pass pass pass pass pass SelectIO(1) +2,000V +2,000V +2,000V +2,000V +2,000V +2,000V +2,000V +2,000V +2,000V +2,000V +2,000V +2,000V +2,000V +2,000V +2,000V +2,000V +2,000V +2,000V +2,000V +2,000V +2,000V +2,000V +2,000V GTP +1,000V N/A +1,000V N/A +1,000V N/A +1,000V N/A +1,000V N/A +1,000V N/A +1,000V N/A +1,000V +1,000V +1,000V +1,000V +1,000V +1,000V +1,000V +1,000V +1,000V Charge Device Model Passing Voltage SelectIO +400V +400V +400V +400V +400V +400V +400V +400V(3) +400V(3) +400V +400V +400V +400V +400V +400V +400V +400V +400V +400V +400V +400V +400V +400V GTP +250V N/A +250V N/A +250V(2) N/A +250V(2) N/A +250V(2) N/A +250V(4) N/A +250V(4) N/A +250V(2) +250V +250V +250V +250V +250V +250V +250V(2) +250V
pass pass
pass(5) pass(5) pass(6) pass(6) pass pass pass pass pass pass pass pass
www.xilinx.com
19
Table 1-12: ESD and Latch-up Data for XC5VxXxxx/T (Contd) Human Body Model Passing Voltage Device XC5VSX240T XC5VTX150T XC5VTX240T Notes:
1. Human body model passing voltage for VBATT pin is 1,000V. This data is updated based on the data collected after the HBM tester was upgraded to remove the HBM-ESD trailing pulse. 2. If an internal AC coupling capacitor is used in the GTP receiver input (RX) pin, charge device model passing voltage is 200V. Compliance to ANSI/ESD S20.20 (ESD Association standard for the electrostatic discharge control program) is necessary. 3. Charge device model passing voltage for VBATT pin is 300V. 4. If an internal AC coupling capacitor is used in the GTP receiver input (RX) pin, the CDM level is 150V. Compliance to ANSI/ESD S20.20 (ESD Association standard for the electrostatic discharge control program) is necessary. 5. The D_IN and CS_B pins on XC5VLX220 and XC5VLX220T devices pass at 150 mA. 6. The D_IN, CS_B, and RDWR_B pins on XC5VLX300 and XC5VLX330T devices pass at 150 mA.
Charge Device Model Passing Voltage SelectIO +400V +400V +400V GTP +250V(2) +250V +250V
Table 1-13:
Device XC6SLX16 XC6SLX25
Table 1-14:
Device
20
www.xilinx.com
Table 1-14:
Device
1. If the system monitor function is used, HBM passing voltage is: 1,000V for all of the devices. 2. If the system monitor function is used, CDM passing voltage for the AVDD, AVSS, VN, VP, VREFN, VREFP, DXN and DXP pins is: 200V for XC6VLX130T, XC6VLX195T, XC6VLX240T, XC6VSX315T, XC6VHX250T, XC6VHX255T, and XC6VHX565T devices; 150V for XC6VLX75T, XC6VLX365T, XC6VLX550T, XC6VLX760, XC6VSX475T, and XC6VHX380Tdevices. The DXN and DXP pins can withstand CDM voltages up to 500V without impacting the temperature sensing function. 3. The CDM passing voltage for the CCLK pin of the XC6VSX475T, XC6VHX250T, XC6VHX255T, and XC6VHX565T devices is 450V.
Table 1-15:
Device
XC7K325T
Pass
Equation 1-1
where: x2 = Chi-squared value at a desired confidence level and (2f + 2) degrees of freedom, where f is the number of failures. The acceleration factor is calculated using the Arrhenius relationship:
Ea 1 1 A = exp ----- ------- ------ T J 1 T J 2 k
Equation 1-2
where:
Ea = Thermal activation energy (0.7eV is assumed and used in failure rate calculation except EPROM in which 0.58 eV is used).
www.xilinx.com
21
A = Acceleration factor k = Boltzman's constant, 8.617164 x 10-5 eV/K TJ1 = Use junction temperature in degrees Kelvin (K = C + 273.16) TJ2 = Stress junction temperature in degrees Kelvin (K = C + 273.16)
22
www.xilinx.com
Configuration Configuration Block RAM Error(4) Block RAM Error(4) Memory Memory 160 181 405 437 263 165 104 190 104 185 71 160 181 478 770 484 692 247 373 293 389 59 20% 20% 8% 8% 11% 13% +15% 18% +24% 50% +80% 80% +90% -14% +18% -48% +110%
Virtex Virtex-E Virtex-II Virtex-II Pro Virtex-4 Virtex-5 Virtex-6 Spartan-3 Spartan-3E Spartan-3A Spartan-6 7 Series FPGAs
2.74 x 10-14 1.55 x 10-14 6.70 x 10-15 1.26 x 10-14 2.40 x 10-14 1.31 x 10-14 1.00 x 10-14 6.99 x 10-15
3.91 x 10-14 2.74 x 10-14 3.96 x 10-14 1.14 x 10-14 3.48 x 10-14 2.73 x 10-14 2.20 x 10-14 6.32 x 10-15
Notes:
1. Data from Los Alamos Neutron Science Center (LANSCE). 2. Spartan-6 and 7 series FPGAs data based on thorium foil testing and package alpha emissivity of 0.0015 counts/cm2/hr. Virtex-6 FPGA alpha data estimated using Virtex-6 Real Time Soft Error Rate Results. 3. Data compiled from the Rosetta experiment which includes upsets from neutron secondaries and packaging alpha particles. See WP286, Continuing Experiments of Atmospheric Neutron Effects on Deep Submicron Integrated Circuits. 4. 90% confidence interval.
www.xilinx.com
23
24
www.xilinx.com
Chapter 2
Summary
The failures listed in Table 2-1 are also listed in each family device table with failure analysis results in the footnotes. Table 2-1:
Summary of HTOL Test Results
Device
XC4xxx/E (0.6 m) XC4xxx/E (0.5 m) XC4xxxXL XC4xxxXLA XCSxxx XCSxxxXL XC2Sxxx XCVxxx XCVxxx (shrink) XCVxxxE XCVxxxE (shrink) XC2SxxxE XC2Vxxx XCE2Vxxx XC2VPxxx
Lot Quantity
13 12 26 12 14 14 10 20 11 31 17 15 21 9 8
Fail Quantity
0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0
Device Quantity
592 519 1,067 524 616 610 452 868 483 1,240 580 781 894 395 357
Equivalent Failure Rate at Device Hours 60% CL and at TJ = 125C TJ = 55C (FIT)
813,893 1,052,368 2,230,289 1,010,806 1,055,224 1,015,462 1,085,860 1,974,124 1,044,774 2,741,592 1,454,931 1,056,995 2,201,393 1,086,039 1,057,873 14 25 24 12 11 12 11 6 11 20 17 11 5 11 11
www.xilinx.com
25
Table 2-1:
Device
XCE2VPxxx XC3Sxxx XC3SxxxE XC3SxxxA XC3SxxxAN XC3SDxxxA
Lot Quantity
8 10 11 11 9 8 6 10 17 11 3 5 3 3
Fail Quantity
0 0 0 0 0 0
Device Quantity
384 445 495 531 435 332 304 470 1,000 617 249 273 240 231
Equivalent Failure Rate at Device Hours 60% CL and at TJ = 125C TJ = 55C (FIT)
1,162,258 1,017,942 1,060,436 1,103,151 1,103,223 1,137,253 1,223,275 2,054,365 3,204,320 2,428,064 630,879 1,061,660 503,554 495,908 10 12 11 11 11 10 10 19 8 16 19 24 23 24
XC6Sxxx
XC4VxXxxx XCE4VxVxxx XC5VxXxxx XCE5VxXxxx XC6VxXxxx XCE6VxXxxx 7 Series FPGAs
0
2 1 2 0 1 0 0
Data
Table 2-2:
Device
2 8 2 1 13
0 0 0 0 0
94 364 87 47
592
Table 2-3:
Device
XC4006E
XC4008E XC4010E XC4013E
1
1 3 7
0
0 0 1(1)
45
45 135 294
94,506
90,585 284,572 582,705
26
www.xilinx.com
FPGA Products
Table 2-3:
Device
HTOL Test Results of 0.5 m, Si Gate CMOS Device Type XC4xxx/E (Contd)
Lot Quantity Fail Quantity Device Quantity Actual Device Hours at Equivalent Device Hours at TJ = 125C Failure Rate at 60% CL and TJ = 55C (FIT)
TJ > 125C
998,220
XC4xxx/E Notes:
12
519
1,052,368
25 FIT
Table 2-4:
Device
HTOL Test Results for 0.35 m Si Gate CMOS Device Type XC4xxxXL
Lot Quantity Fail Quantity Device Quantity Actual Device Hours at Equivalent Device Hours at TJ = 125C Failure Rate at 60% CL and TJ = 55C (FIT)
TJ > 125C
133,700 653,141 186,000 144,132 145,252 126,840 54,632 1,443,697
2 9 2 4 4 2 3 26
1(1)
0 0 0 0
2(2)
3
1. The device failed at post 1,033 hours. No failure analysis was performed. 2. No defect was found at post 48 hours.
Table 2-5:
Device
HTOL Test Results for 0.25 m Si Gate CMOS Device Type XC4xxxXLA
Lot Quantity Fail Quantity Device Quantity Actual Device Hours at Equivalent Device Hours at TJ = 125C Failure Rate at 60% CL and TJ = 55C (FIT)
TJ > 125C
409,785 157,000 88,797 84,000 254,643 994,225
5 2 1 1 3 12
0 0 0 0 0 0
www.xilinx.com
27
Table 2-6:
Device
HTOL Test Results for 0.35 m Si Gate CMOS Device Type XCSxxx
Lot Quantity Fail Quantity Device Quantity Actual Device Hours at Equivalent Device Hours at TJ = 125C Failure Rate at 60% CL and TJ = 55C (FIT)
TJ > 125C
78,351 218,639 340,038 227,376 864,404
1 4 4 5 14
0 0 0 0 0
Table 2-7:
Device
HTOL Test Results for 0.25 m Si Gate CMOS Device Type XCSxxxXL
Lot Quantity
6 2 6 14
Fail Quantity
0 0 0 0
Device Quantity
266 80 264 610
Equivalent Failure Rate at Device Hours 60% CL and at TJ = 125C TJ = 55C (FIT)
433,766 159,566 422,130 1,015,462 12 FIT
Table 2-8:
Device
HTOL Test Results for 0.22/0.18 m Si Gate CMOS Device Type XC2Sxxx
Lot Quantity 2 8 10 Fail Quantity 0 0 0 Device Quantity 89 363 452 Actual Device Hours at TJ > 125C 178,088 733,929 912,017 Equivalent Failure Rate at Device Hours 60% CL and at TJ = 125C TJ = 55C (FIT) 204,672 881,188 1,085,860 11 FIT
Table 2-9:
Device XCV50 XCV100 XCV150 XCV200 XCV300 XCV800
HTOL Test Results for 0.22 m Si Gate CMOS Device Type XCVxxx
Lot Quantity 4 1 1 5 5 2 2 20 Fail Quantity 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Device Quantity 180 45 45 226 284 44 44 868 Actual Device Hours at TJ > 125C 319,500 90,090 90,090 455,724 309,695 28,402 30,360 1,323,861 Equivalent Failure Rate at Device Hours 60% CL and at TJ = 125C TJ = 55C (FIT) 340,250 97,778 97,655 527,095 822,081 38,484 50,780 1,974,124 6 FIT
XCV1000 XCVxxx
28
www.xilinx.com
FPGA Products
Table 2-10:
Device XCV300 XCV400 XCV600 XCV800 XCV1000 XCVxxx
HTOL Test Results for 0.22/0.18 m Si Gate CMOS Device Type XCVxxx (Shrink)
Lot Quantity 2 2 5 1 1 11 Fail Quantity 0 0 0 0 0 0 Device Quantity 90 90 213 45 45 483 Actual Device Hours at TJ > 125C 180,315 160,155 415,542 90,090 90,180 936,282 Equivalent Failure Rate at Device Hours 60% CL and at TJ = 125C TJ = 55C (FIT) 202,304 174,509 468,643 96,514 103,804 1,044,774 11 FIT
Table 2-11:
Device XCV50E XCV100E XCV200E XCV600E XCV405E XCV812E XCV1000E XCV1600E XCV2000E XCVxxxE
Notes:
HTOL Test Results for 0.18 m Si Gate CMOS Device Type XCVxxxE
Lot Quantity 2 2 3 4 4 4 2 5 5 31 Fail Quantity 0 0 0 0 1(1) 0 0 1(2) 1(3) 3 Device Quantity 84 80 165 118 209 159 97 195 133 1,240 Actual Device Hours at TJ > 125C 126,630 115,765 215,436 155,046 249,914 266,663 98,080 389,099 156,080 1,768,713 Equivalent Failure Rate at Device Hours 60% CL and at TJ = 125C TJ = 55C (FIT) 336,137 115,765 571,872 411,568 266,058 284,177 98,081 461,936 195,998 2,741,592 20 FIT
1. Functional failure at post 184 hours. 2. Marginal failure at post 501 hours. 3. No defect found at post 281 hours.
www.xilinx.com
29
Table 2-12:
Device XCV400E XCV600E XCV1000E XCV2000E XCV2600E XCV3200E XCVxxxE (shrink)
Notes:
HTOL Test Results for 0.18/0.15 m Si Gate CMOS Device Type XCVxxxE (Shrink)
Lot Quantity 3 1 7 5 1 1 17 Fail Quantity 0 0 0 0 1(1) 0 1 Device Quantity 135 45 234 166 22 23 580 Actual Device Hours at TJ > 125C 359,873 83,205 359,873 312,094 23,604 46,000 1,013,731 Equivalent Failure Rate at Device Hours 60% CL and at TJ = 125C TJ = 55C (FIT) 331,387 96,862 580,352 473,588 23,604 46,000 1,454,931 17 FIT
Table 2-13:
Device XC2S100E XC2S150E XC2S300E XC2S400E XC2SxxxE
HTOL Test Results for 0.18/0.15 m Si Gate CMOS Device Type XC2SxxxE
Lot Quantity 6 1 7 1 15 Fail Quantity 0 0 0 0 0 Device Quantity 275 45 416 45 781 Actual Device Hours at TJ > 125C 278,162 91,665 384,671 95,765 845,263 Equivalent Failure Rate at Device Hours 60% CL and at TJ = 125C TJ = 55C (FIT) 415,349 110,293 416,410 114,943 1,056,995 11 FIT
Table 2-14:
Device XC2V40 XC2V80 XC2V250 XC2V500 XC2V1000 XC2V1500 XC2V2000 XC2V3000
HTOL Test Results for 0.15 m Si Gate CMOS Device Type XC2Vxxx
Lot Quantity 3 2 1 4 3 1 1 3 Fail Quantity 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Device Quantity 134 88 45 164 135 45 27 134 Actual Device Hours at TJ > 125C 249,053 177,881 68,400 247,832 270,990 90,630 54,054 225,627 Equivalent Failure Rate at Device Hours 60% CL and at TJ = 125C TJ = 55C (FIT) 317,935 190,660 79,796 328,763 338,744 106,505 67,742 303,030
30
www.xilinx.com
FPGA Products
Table 2-14:
Device XC2V4000 XC2V6000 XC2Vxxx
HTOL Test Results for 0.15 m Si Gate CMOS Device Type XC2Vxxx (Contd)
Lot Quantity 1 2 21 Fail Quantity 0 0 0 Device Quantity 44 78 894 Actual Device Hours at TJ > 125C 88,088 157,991 1,630,546 Equivalent Failure Rate at Device Hours 60% CL and at TJ = 125C TJ = 55C (FIT) 99,435 368,783 2,201,393 5 FIT
Table 2-15:
Device XC2VP7 XC2VP20 XC2VP30 XC2VP40 XC2VP50 XC2VPxxx
HTOL Test Results for 0.13 m Si Gate CMOS Device Type XC2VPxxx
Lot Quantity 1 1 2 2 2 8 Fail Quantity 0 0 0 0 0 0 Device Quantity 45 45 89 89 89 357 Actual Device Hours at TJ > 125C 91,305 50,355 178,354 178,944 178,713 677,671 Equivalent Failure Rate at Device Hours 60% CL and at TJ = 125C TJ = 55C (FIT) 126,841 67,203 269,598 292,249 301,982 1,057,873 11 FIT
Table 2-16:
Device
HTOL Test Results for 0.15 m Si Gate CMOS Device Type XCE2Vxxx
Lot Quantity 8 1 9 Fail Quantity 0 0 0 Device Quantity 352 43 395 Actual Device Hours at TJ > 125C 706,638 86,129 792,767 Equivalent Failure Rate at Device Hours 60% CL and at TJ = 125C TJ = 55C (FIT) 937,610 148,429 1,086,039 11 FIT
Table 2-17:
Device XCE2VP7 XCE2VP40 XCE2VP50 XCE2VP70
HTOL Test Results for 0.13 m Si Gate CMOS Device Type XCE2VPxxx
Lot Quantity 2 2 3 1 8 Fail Quantity 0 0 0 0 0 Device Quantity 134 89 139 22 384 Actual Device Hours at TJ > 125C 399,152 178,675 234,662 22,000 834,489 Equivalent Failure Rate at Device Hours 60% CL and at TJ = 125C TJ = 55C (FIT) 399,152 301,000 410,490 51,616 1,162,258 10 FIT
XCE2VPxxx
www.xilinx.com
31
Table 2-18:
Device XC3S400 XC3S1000 XC3S1500 XC3Sxxx
HTOL Test Results for 0.09 m Si Gate CMOS Device Type XC3Sxxx
Lot Quantity 4 4 2 10 Fail Quantity 0 0 0 0 Device Quantity 175 180 90 445 Actual Device Hours at TJ > 125C 306,035 361,080 135,495 802,610 Equivalent Failure Rate at Device Hours 60% CL and at TJ = 125C TJ = 55C (FIT) 374,236 463,462 180,244 1,017,942 12 FIT
Table 2-19:
Device XC3S250E XC3S500E XC3S700E
HTOL Test Results for 0.09 m Si Gate CMOS Device Type XC3SxxxE
Lot Quantity 2 6 1 2 11 Fail Quantity 0 0 0 0 0 Device Quantity 90 270 45 90 495 Actual Device Hours at TJ > 125C 183,060 450,170 45,000 138,690 816,920 Equivalent Failure Rate at Device Hours 60% CL and at TJ = 125C TJ = 55C (FIT) 221,112 578,565 50,809 209,950 1,060,436 11 FIT
XC3S1600E XC3SxxxE
Table 2-20:
Device XC3S200A
HTOL Test Results for 0.09 m Si Gate CMOS Device Type XC3SxxxA
Lot Quantity 2 9 11 Fail Quantity 0 0 0 Device Quantity 49 482 531 Actual Device Hours at TJ > 125C 49,629 970,834 1,020,463 Equivalent Failure Rate at Device Hours 60% CL and at TJ = 125C TJ = 55C (FIT) 53,551 1,049,600 1,103,151 11 FIT
XC3S1400A XC3SxxxxA
Table 2-21:
Device
HTOL Test Results for 0.09 m Si Gate CMOS Device Type XC3SxxxAN
Lot Quantity 1 8 9 Fail Quantity 0 0 0 Device Quantity 44 391 435 Actual Device Hours at TJ > 125C 88,000 742,832 830,832 Equivalent Failure Rate at Device Hours 60% CL and at TJ = 125C TJ = 55C (FIT) 135,192 968,031 1,103,223 11 FIT
32
www.xilinx.com
FPGA Products
Table 2-22:
Device
HTOL Test Results for 0.09 m Si Gate CMOS Device Type XC3SDxxxA
Lot Quantity 4 4 8 Fail Quantity 0 0 0 Device Quantity 174 158 332 Actual Device Hours at TJ > 125C 349,356 295,371 644,727 Equivalent Failure Rate at Device Hours 60% CL and at TJ = 125C TJ = 55C (FIT) 601,609 535,644 1,137,253 10 FIT
Table 2-23:
Device
HTOL Test Results for 0.045 m Si Gate CMOS Device Type XC6Sxxx
Lot Quantity 1 2 1 1 1 6 Fail Quantity 0 0 0 0 0 0 Device Quantity 45 90 79 45 45 304 Actual Device Hours at TJ > 125C 90,045 180,405 158,474 46,260 45,945 521,129 Equivalent Failure Rate at Device Hours 60% CL and at TJ = 125C TJ = 55C (FIT) 221,007 296,157 439,422 145,311 121,378 1,223,275 10 FIT
Table 2-24:
Device XC4VLX60 XC4VLX80
HTOL Test Results for 0.09 m Si Gate CMOS Device Type XC4VxXxxx
Lot Quantity 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 Fail Quantity 0 0 0 2(1) 0 0 0 0 2 Device Quantity 136 75 45 45 45 42 37 45 470 Actual Device Hours at TJ > 125C 230,316 150,525 90,855 64,629 90,000 84,630 75,757 90,045 898,128 Equivalent Failure Rate at Device Hours 60% CL and at TJ = 125C TJ = 55C (FIT) 531,451 410,767 259,245 231,189 116,627 182,316 100,039 222,731 2,054,365 19 FIT
1. Failure due to substrate defect. New process improvement has been implemented.
www.xilinx.com
33
Table 2-25:
Device
HTOL Test Results for 0.09 m Si Gate CMOS Device Type XCE4VxXxxx
Lot Quantity 8 4 3 2 17 Fail Quantity 0 1(1) 0 0 1 Device Quantity 597 180 133 90 1,000 Actual Device Hours at TJ > 125C 921,000 246,985 267,478 90,585 1,526,048 Equivalent Failure Rate at Device Hours 60% CL and at TJ = 125C TJ = 55C (FIT) 1,977,966 729,418 372,057 124,879 3,204,320 8 FIT
1. Failure due to substrate defect. New process improvement has been implemented.
Table 2-26:
Device
HTOL Test Results for 0.065 m Si Gate CMOS Device Type XC5VxXxxx
Lot Quantity 1 6 3 1 11 Fail Quantity 0 1(1) 1 (2) 0 2 Device Quantity 40 401 134 42 617 Actual Device Hours at TJ > 125C 80,520 729,408 243,545 84,210 1,137,683 Equivalent Failure Rate at Device Hours 60% CL and at TJ = 125C TJ = 55C (FIT) 349,969 1,225,638 504,606 347,851 2,428,064 16 FIT
1. Failure due to substrate defect. New process improvement has been implemented. 2. Failure due to fabrication process defect. New process improvement has been implemented.
Table 2-27:
Device
HTOL Test Results for 0.065 m Si Gate CMOS Device Type XCE5VxXxxx
Lot Quantity 3 3 Fail Quantity 0 0 Device Quantity 249 249 Actual Device Hours at TJ > 125C 249,000 249,000 Equivalent Failure Rate at Device Hours 60% CL and at TJ = 125C TJ = 55C (FIT) 630,879 630,879 19 FIT
XCE05VL11 XCE5VxXxxx
Table 2-28:
Device
HTOL Test Results for 0.040 m Si Gate CMOS Device Type XC6VxXxxx
Lot Quantity 1 1 2 1 Fail Quantity 0 0 1(1) 0 Device Quantity 76 45 108 44 Actual Device Hours at TJ > 125C 114,000 90,000 214,000 88,000 Equivalent Failure Rate at Device Hours 60% CL and at TJ = 125C TJ = 55C (FIT) 239,188 188,833 449,002 184,637
34
www.xilinx.com
FPGA Products
Table 2-28:
Device
HTOL Test Results for 0.040 m Si Gate CMOS Device Type XC6VxXxxx (Contd)
Lot Quantity 5 Fail Quantity 1 Device Quantity 273 Actual Device Hours at TJ > 125C 506,000 Equivalent Failure Rate at Device Hours 60% CL and at TJ = 125C TJ = 55C (FIT) 1,061,660 24 FIT
XC6VxXxxx
Notes:
1. One unit failed for configuration at post HTOL stress, but the root cause could not be identified during failure analysis.
Table 2-29:
Device XCE06L24T
HTOL Test Results for 0.040 m Si Gate CMOS Device Type XCE6VxXxxx
Lot Quantity 3 3 Fail Quantity 0 0 Device Quantity 240 240 Actual Device Hours at TJ > 125C 240,000 240,000 Equivalent Failure Rate at Device Hours 60% CL and at TJ = 125C TJ = 55C (FIT) 503,554 503,554 23 FIT
XCE6VxXxxx
Table 2-30:
Device
HTOL Test Results for 0.028 m Si Gate CMOS Device Type 7 Series FPGAs
Lot Quantity 3 3 Fail Quantity 0 0 Device Quantity 231 231 Actual Device Hours at TJ > 125C 385,000 385,000 Equivalent Failure Rate at Device Hours 60% CL and at TJ = 125C TJ = 55C (FIT) 495,908 495,908 24 FIT
Summary
Table 2-31:
Device XC4xxxXLA XCSxxxXL XCSxxx XCVxxxE XCVxxxE (shrink) XC2Vxxx XC2VPxxx XC2SxxxE XC3Sxxx
www.xilinx.com
35
Table 2-31:
Device
Data
Table 2-32:
Device XC4020XLA XC4xxxXLA
Table 2-33:
Device
XCS40XL
Table 2-34:
Device XCS20 XCSxxx
Table 2-35:
Device
XCV1600E
36
www.xilinx.com
FPGA Products
Table 2-36:
Device
THB Test Results for Si Gate CMOS Device Type XCVxxxE (Shrink)
Lot Quantity 1 1 Fail Quantity 0 0 Device Quantity 45 45 Total Device Hours 45,720 45,720
Table 2-37:
Device
XC2V3000 XC2Vxxx
Notes:
1. Failure due to an assembly process defect. Corrective action has been implemented.
Table 2-38:
Device
Table 2-39:
Device
Table 2-40:
Device
www.xilinx.com
37
Table 2-41:
Device
Table 2-42:
Device
XC3S200A XC3SxxxA
Table 2-43:
Device
XC3SD1800A
Table 2-44:
Device
XC3S1400AN
Table 2-45:
Device
Table 2-46:
Device
XC5VSX50T XC5VLX85T
38
www.xilinx.com
FPGA Products
Table 2-46:
Device
THB Test Results for Si Gate CMOS Device Type XC5VxXxxx (Contd)
Lot Quantity 3 2 7 Fail Quantity 0 0 0 Device Quantity 135 88 308 Total Device Hours 136,890 87,560 311,010
Table 2-47:
Device
Table 2-48:
Device
THB Test Results for Si Gate CMOS Device Type 7 Series FPGAs
Lot Quantity 6 6 Fail Quantity 0 0 Device Quantity 147 147 Total Device Hours 147,000 147,000
www.xilinx.com
39
Summary
Table 2-49:
Device XC4xxxE XC4xxxXLA XCSxxx XCSxxxXL XCVxxx (shrink) XCVxxxE XCVxxxE (shrink) XC2Sxxx XC2SxxxE XC2Vxxx XC2VPxxx XC3Sxxx XC3SxxxE XC3SxxxA XC3SDxxxA XC4VxXxxx XC5VxXxxx XC6VxXxxx 7 Series FPGAs
Data
Table 2-50:
Device XC4013E
40
www.xilinx.com
FPGA Products
Table 2-51:
Device
XC4052XLA
Table 2-52:
Device XCS20
Table 2-53:
Device
XCS40XL
Table 2-54:
Device XCV300
Table 2-55:
Device
XCV1600E
Table 2-56:
Device
Table 2-57:
Device XC2S30 XC2S15 XC2S200 XC2Sxxx
www.xilinx.com
41
Table 2-58:
Device
XC2S300E
Table 2-59:
Device XC2V500
XC2V6000 XC2Vxxx
Table 2-60:
Device
Table 2-61:
Device XC3S200
XC3S1500 XC3Sxxx
Table 2-62:
Device
XC3S500E XC3SxxxE
Table 2-63:
Device
XC3S1400A
Table 2-64:
Device
XC3SD3400A
42
www.xilinx.com
FPGA Products
Table 2-65:
Device
Table 2-66:
Device
XC5VLX50T
Table 2-67:
Device
Table 2-68:
Device
Summary
Table 2-69:
Device XC4xxxE XC4xxxXL
www.xilinx.com
43
Table 2-69:
Device
XC4xxxXLA XCSxxx XCSxxxXL XC2Sxxx XC2SxxxE XCVxxx XCVxxx (shrink) XCVxxxE XCVxxxE (shrink) XC2Vxxx XC2VPxxx XC3Sxxx XC3SxxxE XC3SxxxA XC3SDxxxA XC3SxxxAN XC6Sxxx XC4VxXxxx XC5VxXxxx XC6VxXxxx 7 Series FPGAs
Notes:
1. Failures listed in this table are also listed in each family device table with failure analysis results in the footnote.
Data
Table 2-70:
Device XC4013E
Temperature Cycling Test Results for Si Gate CMOS Device Type XC4xxx/E
Stress Condition B: 55C to +125C Lot Quantity 2 Fail Quantity 0 Device Quantity 90 Total Device Cycles 90,000
44
www.xilinx.com
FPGA Products
Table 2-71:
Device
Temperature Cycling Test Results for Si Gate CMOS Device Type XC4xxxXL
Stress Condition B: 55C to +125C B: 55C to +125C Lot Quantity 1 1 Fail Quantity 0 0 Device Quantity 45 45 Total Device Cycles 45,000 45,000
XC4005XL XC4xxxXL
Table 2-72:
Device
Temperature Cycling Test Results for Si Gate CMOS Device Type XC4xxxXLA
Stress Condition B: 55C to +125C B: 55C to +125C B: 55C to +125C Lot Quantity 1 1 2 Fail Quantity 0 0 0 Device Quantity 45 45 90 Total Device Cycles 45,000 45,000 90,000
Table 2-73:
Device XCS10 XCS20 XCSxxx
Table 2-74:
Device
Temperature Cycling Test Results for Si Gate CMOS Device Type XCSxxxXL
Stress Condition B: 55C to +125C Lot Quantity 2 Fail Quantity 0 Device Quantity 90 Total Device Cycles 90,000
XCS20XL
Table 2-75:
Device XC2S15
Temperature Cycling Test Results for Si Gate CMOS Device Type XC2Sxxx
Stress Condition B: 55C to +125C B: 55C to +125C B: 55C to +125C Lot Quantity 2 2 4 Fail Quantity 0 0 0 Device Quantity 90 90 180 Total Device Cycles 92,250 90,000 182,250
XC2S150 XC2Sxxx
www.xilinx.com
45
Table 2-76:
Device
Temperature Cycling Test Results for Si Gate CMOS Device Type XC2SxxxE
Stress Condition B: 55C to +125C B: 55C to +125C B: 55C to +125C B: 55C to +125C B: 55C to +125C Lot Quantity 2 4 2 3 11 Fail Quantity 0 0 0 0 0 Device Quantity 90 180 90 135 495 Total Device Cycles 90,000 182,250 90,000 135,000 497,250
Table 2-77:
Device XCV50 XCV100
Temperature Cycling Test Results for Si Gate CMOS Device Type XCVxxx
Stress Condition B: 55C to +125C B: 55C to +125C B: 55C to +125C Lot Quantity 1 1 2 Fail Quantity 0 0 0 Device Quantity 45 45 90 Total Device Cycles 45,000 45,000 90,000
XCVxxx
Table 2-78:
Device XCV400
Temperature Cycling Test Results for Si Gate CMOS Device Type XCVxxx (Shrink)
Stress Condition B: 55C to +125C B: 55C to +125C Lot Quantity 1 1 Fail Quantity 0 0 Device Quantity 45 45 Total Device Cycles 45,000 45,000
XCVxxx (shrink)
Table 2-79:
Device
Temperature Cycling Test Results for Si Gate CMOS Device Type XCVxxxE
Stress Condition B: 55C to +125C B: 55C to +125C B: 55C to +125C Lot Quantity 1 1 2 Fail Quantity 0 0 0 Device Quantity 80 40 120 Total Device Cycles 80,000 40,320 120,720
46
www.xilinx.com
FPGA Products
Table 2-80:
Device
Temperature Cycling Test Results for Si Gate CMOS Device Type XCVxxxE (Shrink)
Stress Condition B: 55C to +125C B: 55C to +125C B: 55C to +125C B: 55C to +125C Lot Quantity 1 1 1 3 Fail Quantity 0 0 0 0 Device Quantity 45 44 45 134 Total Device Cycles 45,000 44,000 47,250 136,250
Table 2-81:
Device
Temperature Cycling Test Results for Si Gate CMOS Device Type XC2Vxxx
Stress Condition B: 55C to +125C B: 55C to +125C B: 55C to +125C B: 55C to +125C B: 55C to +125C and G: 40C to +125C Lot Quantity 2 2 1 1 Fail Quantity 0 0 0 0 Device Quantity 90 90 45 45 Total Device Cycles 90,000 90,000 45,000 45,900
XC2Vxxx
270
270,900
Table 2-82:
Device
Temperature Cycling Test Results for Si Gate CMOS Device Type XC2VPxxx
Stress Condition B: 55C to +125C B: 55C to +125C G: 40C to +125C B: 55C to +125C B: 55C to +125C Lot Quantity 3 2 3 1 9 Fail Quantity 0 0 0 0 0 Device Quantity 135 90 93 50 368 Total Device Cycles 135,000 90,000 95,250 50,000 370,250
www.xilinx.com
47
Table 2-83:
Device
Temperature Cycling Test Results for Si Gate CMOS Device Type XC3Sxxx
Stress Condition B: 55C to +125C B: 55C to +125C B: 55C to +125C B: 55C to +125C B: 55C to +125C Lot Quantity 6 5 4 5 20 Fail Quantity 0 0 0 0 0 Device Quantity 270 222 180 225 897 Total Device Cycles 271,500 224,250 166,500 225,000 887,250
Table 2-84:
Device
Temperature Cycling Test Results for Si Gate CMOS Device Type XC3SxxxE
Stress Condition B: 55C to +125C B: 55C to +125C B: 55C to +125C B: 55C to +125C B: 55C to +125C B: 55C to +125C Lot Quantity 6 3 4 2 4 19 Fail Quantity 0 0 0 0 0 0 Device Quantity 269 135 180 90 179 853 Total Device Cycles 269,000 137,250 180,000 90,000 181,250 857,500
Table 2-85:
Device
Temperature Cycling Test Results for Si Gate CMOS Device Type XC3SxxxA
Stress Condition B: 55C to +125C B: 55C to +125C B: 55C to +125C B: 55C to +125C Lot Quantity 1 2 2 5 Fail Quantity 0 0 0 0 Device Quantity 45 90 90 225 Total Device Cycles 45,000 90,000 90,000 225,900
48
www.xilinx.com
FPGA Products
Table 2-86:
Device
Temperature Cycling Test Results for Si Gate CMOS Device Type XC3SDxxxA
Stress Condition B: 55C to +125C B: 55C to +125C B: 55C to +125C Lot Quantity 1 6 7 Fail Quantity 0 0 0 Device Quantity 45 258 303 Total Device Cycles 45,000 258,000 303,000
Table 2-87:
Device
Temperature Cycling Test Results for Si Gate CMOS Device Type XC3SxxxAN
Stress Condition B: 55C to +125C B: 55C to +125C B: 55C to +125C B: 55C to +125C Lot Quantity 1 3 5 9 Fail Quantity 0 0 0 0 Device Quantity 45 84 174 303 Total Device Cycles 45,000 84,000 174,000 303,000
Table 2-88:
Device
Temperature Cycling Test Results for Si Gate CMOS Device Type XC6Sxxx
Stress Condition B: 55C to +125C B: 55C to +125C B: 55C to +125C B: 55C to +125C B: 55C to +125C B: 55C to +125C B: 55C to +125C B: 55C to +125C C: 65C to +150C Lot Quantity 1 4 4 1 5 7 11 Fail Quantity 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Device Quantity 45 135 135 45 176 358 349 Total Device Cycles 45,000 122,580 135,990 45,000 179,206 366,930 357,163
XC6Sxxx
33
1,243
1,252,212
www.xilinx.com
49
Table 2-89:
Device
Temperature Cycling Test Results for Si Gate CMOS Device Type XC4VxXxxx
Stress Condition B: 55C to +125C B: 55C to +125C B: 55C to +125C B: 55C to +125C B: 55C to +125C B: 55C to +125C B: 55C to +125C B: 55C to +125C B: 55C to +125C B: 55C to +125C B: 55C to +125C Lot Quantity 1 1 2 1 4 1 6 1 1 1 19 Fail Quantity 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Device Quantity 45 45 90 45 120 45 206 50 45 45 736 Total Device Cycles 45,000 45,000 90,000 45,000 120,000 45,000 206,000 50,000 45,000 45,000 736,000
XC4VFX20 XC4VLX15 XC4VLX25 XC4VLX40 XC4VLX60 XC4VLX80 XC4VLX100 XC4VLX200 XC4VSX25 XC4VSX35 XC4VxXxxx
Table 2-90:
Device
Temperature Cycling Test Results for Si Gate CMOS Device Type XC5VxXxxx
Stress Condition B: 55C to +125C B: 55C to +125C B: 55C to +125C B: 55C to +125C B: 55C to +125C B: 55C to +125C B: 55C to +125C Lot Quantity 1 1 2 3 2 4 3 Fail Quantity 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Device Quantity 45 45 90 128 90 120 74 Total Device Cycles 45,000 45,000 90,000 128,000 90,000 120,000 74,000
50
www.xilinx.com
FPGA Products
Table 2-90:
Device
Temperature Cycling Test Results for Si Gate CMOS Device Type XC5VxXxxx (Contd)
Stress Condition B: 55C to +125C B: 55C to +125C Lot Quantity 2 18 Fail Quantity 0 0 Device Quantity 107 699 Total Device Cycles 119,152 711,152
XC5VSX50T XC5VXxXxxx
Table 2-91:
Device
Temperature Cycling Test Results for Si Gate CMOS Device Type XC6VxXxxx
Stress Condition B: 55C to +125C B: 55C to +125C B: 55C to +125C B: 55C to +125C B: 55C to +125C B: 55C to +125C B: 55C to +125C B: 55C to +125C B: 55C to +125C B: 55C to +125C B: 55C to +125C Lot Quantity 2 1 7 3 9 1 13 1 2 22 61 Fail Quantity 1(1) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Device Quantity 50 25 118 45 283 44 362 45 43 523 1,538 Total Device Cycles 49,425 25,425 118,000 45,000 239,757 44,000 378,813 45,000 44,362 523,029 1,512,811
XC6VHX255T XC6VHX380T XC6VHX565T XC6VLX115T(2) XC6VLX130T XC6VLX195T XC6VLX240T XC6VLX365T XC6VLX760 XC6VSX475T XC6VxXxxx
Notes:
1. Device failed at post temperature cycling stress was due to a solder particle at bump. Post bump cleaning improvement is being implemented. 2. XC6VLX115T is an internal product qualification vehicle.
www.xilinx.com
51
Table 2-92:
Device
Temperature Cycling Test Results for Si Gate CMOS Device Type 7 Series FPGAs
Stress Condition B: 55C to +125C B: 55C to +125C Lot Quantity 3 3 Fail Quantity 0 0 Device Quantity 75 75 Total Device Cycles 75,000 75,000
Autoclave Test
The autoclave test is conducted under the conditions of 121C, 100% RH (unbiased), and 29.7 PSI. Package preconditioning is performed on the testing samples prior to the autoclave stress test.
Summary
Table 2-93:
Device XC3Sxxx XC3SxxxE
Data
Table 2-94:
Device XC3S200
Table 2-95:
Device
XC3S100E
52
www.xilinx.com
FPGA Products
Summary
Table 2-96:
Device XC2SxxxE XCVxxxE XCVxxxE (shrink) XC3Sxxx XC3SxxxA XC3SDxxxA XC3SxxxAN XC6Sxxx XC4VxXxxx
Data
Table 2-97:
Device XC2S100E XC2S150E XC2SxxxE
Table 2-98:
Device
XCV1000E
Table 2-99:
Device
HAST Test Results for Si Gate CMOS Device Type XCVxxxE (Shrink)
Stress Condition 130C, 85% RH 130C, 85% RH Lot Quantity 1 1 Fail Quantity 0 0 Device Quantity 45 45 Total Device Cycles 4,320 4,320
XCV400E XCV600E
www.xilinx.com
53
Table 2-99:
Device
HAST Test Results for Si Gate CMOS Device Type XCVxxxE (Shrink) (Contd)
Stress Condition 130C, 85% RH 130C, 85% RH Lot Quantity 1 3 Fail Quantity 0 0 Device Quantity 45 111 Total Device Cycles 4,032 12,672
XCV1000E XCVxxxE
Table 2-100:
Device XC3S1500
Table 2-101:
Device
XC3S1400A XC3SxxxA
Table 2-102:
Device
XC3SD3400A XC3SDxxxxA
Table 2-103:
Device
Table 2-104:
Device
54
www.xilinx.com
FPGA Products
Table 2-105:
Device
XC4VLX100
Summary
Table 2-106:
Device XC4xxxXLA XCSxxx XCSxxxXL XC2Sxxx XC2SxxxE XCVxxx XCVxxx (shrink) XCVxxxE XCVxxxE (shrink) XC3Sxxx XC3SxxxE XC3SxxxA XC3SxxxAN XC3SDxxxA XC6Sxxx XC4xXxxx XC5VxXxxx
www.xilinx.com
55
Data
Table 2-107:
Device XC4013XLA XC4xxxXLA
Table 2-108:
Device XCS10 XCS20 XCSxxx
Table 2-109:
Device XCS05XL XCS20XL XCSxxxXL
Table 2-110:
Device XC2S15 XC2S150 XC2Sxxx
Table 2-111:
Device XC2S50E XC2S100E XC2S300E XC2SxxxE
56
www.xilinx.com
FPGA Products
Table 2-112:
Device XCV100 XCV200 XCVxxx
Table 2-113:
Device XCV400
HASTU Test Results for Si Gate CMOS Device Type XCVxxx (Shrink)
Lot Quantity 1 Fail Quantity 0 Device Quantity 45 Total Device Hours 4,320
Table 2-114:
Device XCV812E
Table 2-115:
Device XCV600E XCV1000E XCVxxxE
HASTU Test Results for Si Gate CMOS Device Type XCVxxxE (Shrink)
Lot Quantity 2 1 3 Fail Quantity 0 0 0 Device Quantity 88 45 133 Total Device Hours 8,448 4,320 12,768
Table 2-116:
Device XC3S1000 XC3S200 XC3S400 XC3S1500 XC3Sxxx
Table 2-117:
Device XC3S100E XC3S1200E XC3S500E
www.xilinx.com
57
Table 2-117:
Device XC3S1600E XC3SxxxE
HASTU Test Results for Si Gate CMOS Device Type XC3SxxxE (Contd)
Lot Quantity 4 13 Fail Quantity 0 0 Device Quantity 180 585 Total Device Hours 17,280 51,840
Table 2-118:
Device XC3S200A XC3S400A XC3S1400A XC3SxxxA
Table 2-119:
Device
Table 2-120:
Device
Table 2-121:
Device XC6SLX4 XC6SLX9 XC6SLX16 XC6SLX45T
XC6SLX150T XC6Sxxx
58
www.xilinx.com
FPGA Products
Table 2-122:
Device XC4VSX25 XC4VSX35
XC4VxXxxx
Table 2-123:
Device
Summary
Table 2-124:
Device XC4xxxE XC4xxxXL XC4xxxXLA XCVxxx XCVxxxE XCVxxx (shrink) XCVxxxE (shrink) XC2Sxxx XC2SxxxE XC2Vxxx XC2VPxxx XC3Sxxx XC3SxxxE XC3SxxxA
www.xilinx.com
59
Table 2-124:
Device
Data
Table 2-125: High-Temperature Storage Life Test Results of Si Gate CMOS Device Type XC4xxxE
Device XC4013E Lot Quantity 2 Fail Quantity 0 Device Quantity 90 Total Device Hours 90,000
Table 2-126: High-Temperature Storage Life Test Results of Si Gate CMOS Device Type XC4xxxXL
Device XC4005XL XC4xxxXL Lot Quantity 1 1 Fail Quantity 0 0 Device Quantity 45 45 Total Device Hours 48,240 48,240
Table 2-127: High-Temperature Storage Life Test Results of Si Gate CMOS Device Type XC4xxxXLA
Device XC4013XLA XC4020XLA XC4xxxXLA Lot Quantity 1 1 2 Fail Quantity 0 0 0 Device Quantity 45 45 90 Total Device Hours 45,000 45,000 90,000
Table 2-128: High-Temperature Storage Life Test Results of Si Gate CMOS Device Type XCVxxx
Device XCV50 XCV100 XCVxxx Lot Quantity 1 1 2 Fail Quantity 0 0 0 Device Quantity 45 45 90 Total Device Hours 45,000 45,000 90,000
60
www.xilinx.com
FPGA Products
Table 2-129: High-Temperature Storage Life Test Results of Si Gate CMOS Device Type XCVxxxE
Device XCV405E XCVxxxE Lot Quantity 1 1 Fail Quantity 0 0 Device Quantity 80 80 Total Device Hours 80,480 80,480
Table 2-130: High-Temperature Storage Life Test Results of Si Gate CMOS Device Type XCVxxx (Shrink)
Device XCV400 XCVxxx (shrink) Lot Quantity 1 1 Fail Quantity 0 0 Device Quantity 45 45 Total Device Hours 45,000 45,000
Table 2-131: High-Temperature Storage Life Test Results of Si Gate CMOS Device Type XCVxxxE (Shrink)
Device XCV400E XCV600E XCV1000E XCVxxxE (shrink) Lot Quantity 1 1 2 4 Fail Quantity 0 0 0 0 Device Quantity 44 44 90 178 Total Device Hours 44,000 44,000 90,000 178,000
Table 2-132: High-Temperature Storage Life Test Results of Si Gate CMOS Device Type XC2Sxxx
Device XC2S15 XC2S150 XC2Sxxx Lot Quantity 2 2 4 Fail Quantity 0 0 0 Device Quantity 90 90 180 Total Device Hours 90,000 91,080 181,080
Table 2-133: High-Temperature Storage Life Test Results of Si Gate CMOS Device Type XC2SxxxE
Device XC2S50E XC2S100E XC2S150E XC2S300E XC2SxxxE Lot Quantity 2 3 2 3 10 Fail Quantity 0 0 0 0 0 Device Quantity 90 135 90 134 449 Total Device Hours 90,000 135,000 91,080 134,000 450,080
www.xilinx.com
61
Table 2-134: High-Temperature Storage Life Test Results of Si Gate CMOS Device Type XC2Vxxx
Device XC2V1000 XC2V1500 XC2Vxxxx Lot Quantity 2 2 4 Fail Quantity 0 0 0 Device Quantity 90 90 180 Total Device Hours 90,000 90,000 180,000
Table 2-135: High-Temperature Storage Life Test Results of Si Gate CMOS Device Type XC2VPxxx
Device XC2VP100 XC2VPxxx Lot Quantity 1 1 Fail Quantity 0 0 Device Quantity 49 49 Total Device Hours 49,747 49,747
Table 2-136: High-Temperature Storage Life Test Results of Si Gate CMOS Device Type XC3Sxxx
Device XC3S200 XC3S400 XC3S1000 XC3S1500 XC3Sxxx Lot Quantity 6 4 4 5 19 Fail Quantity 0 0 0 0 0 Device Quantity 270 180 180 225 855 Total Device Hours 270,000 180,000 180,000 225,000 855,000
Table 2-137: High-Temperature Storage Life Test Results of Si Gate CMOS Device Type XC3SxxxE
Device XC3S100E XC3S250E XC3S500E XC3S1200E XC3S1600E XC3SxxxE Lot Quantity 6 3 4 2 4 19 Fail Quantity 0 0 0 0 0 0 Device Quantity 270 135 179 90 180 854 Total Device Hours 270,000 135,000 179,000 90,000 180,135 854,135
62
www.xilinx.com
FPGA Products
Table 2-138: High-Temperature Storage Life Test Results of Si Gate CMOS Device Type XC3SxxxA
Device XC3S200A XC3S400A XC3S1400A XC3SxxxA Lot Quantity 1 2 2 5 Fail Quantity 0 0 0 0 Device Quantity 45 90 90 225 Total Device Hours 45,000 90,000 90,000 225,000
Table 2-139: High-Temperature Storage Life Test Results of Si Gate CMOS Device Type XC3SDxxxA
Device XC3SD1800A XC3SD3400A XC3SDxxxA Lot Quantity 1 6 7 Fail Quantity 0 0 0 Device Quantity 43 270 313 Total Device Hours 43,000 270,000 313,000
Table 2-140: High-Temperature Storage Life Test Results of Si Gate CMOS Device Type XC3SxxxAN
Device XC3S400AN XC3S1400AN XC3SxxxAN Lot Quantity 3 4 7 Fail Quantity 0 0 0 Device Quantity 84 146 230 Total Device Hours 84,000 146,000 230,000
Table 2-141: High-Temperature Storage Life Test Results of Si Gate CMOS Device Type XC6Sxxx
Device XC6SLX9 XC6SLX16 XC6SLX25T XC6SLX150T XC6SLX45T XC6Sxxx Lot Quantity 4 1 1 2 3 11 Fail Quantity 0 0 0 0 0 0 Device Quantity 135 44 45 90 86 400 Total Device Hours 135,000 44,000 45,000 90,000 86,522 400,522
www.xilinx.com
63
Table 2-142: High-Temperature Storage Life Test Results of Si Gate CMOS Device Type XC4VxXxxx
Device XC4VLX80 XC4VSX25 XC4VSX35 XC4VxXxxx Lot Quantity 2 1 1 4 Fail Quantity 0 0 0 0 Device Quantity 50 44 45 139 Total Device Hours 50,000 44,000 45,000 139,000
Table 2-143: High-Temperature Storage Life Test Results of Si Gate CMOS Device Type XC5VxXxxx
Device XC5VLX30T XC5VLX50T XC5VxXxxx Lot Quantity 1 1 2 Fail Quantity 0 0 0 Device Quantity 45 45 90 Total Device Hours 45,900 45,000 90,900
Table 2-144: High-Temperature Storage Life Test Results of Si Gate CMOS Device Type XC6VxXxxx
Device XC6VHX255T XC6VLX115T(1) XC6VLX130T XC6VxXxxx
Notes:
1. XC6VLX115T is an internal product qualification vehicle.
Lot Quantity 3 3 3 9
Fail Quantity 0 0 0 0
Table 2-145: High-Temperature Storage Life Test Results of Si Gate CMOS Device Type 7 Series FPGAs
Device XC7K325T 7 Series FPGAs Lot Quantity 3 3 Fail Quantity 0 0 Device Quantity 75 75 Total Device Hours 75,000 75,000
64
www.xilinx.com
Summary
Table 2-146: Summary of HTOL Test Results
Lot Quantity 10 13 16 12 Fail Quantity 0 0 0 0 Device Quantity 445 584 715 482 Failure Rate Actual Device Equivalent at 60% CL Device Hours Hours at and TJ = 55C TJ > 125C at TJ = 125C (FIT) 898,995 969,015 760,225 1,067,500 1,069,747 1,070,586 1,004,700 1,105,652 23 23 25 22
Device
Data
Table 2-147:
Device XC1702L XC1704L XC17S30XL XC17S40XL XC17Sxx/XL
HTOL Test Results for 0.6 m Si Gate CMOS Device Type XC17(S)xxx/(X)L
Lot Quantity 3 1 4 2 10 Fail Quantity 0 0 0 0 0 Device Quantity 135 45 175 90 445 Actual Device Hours at TJ > 125C 270,900 90,225 355,035 182,835 898,995 Equivalent Failure Rate at Device Hours 60% CL and at TJ = 125C TJ = 55C (FIT) 279,527 98,248 439,466 252,506 1,069,747 23 FIT
Table 2-148:
Device XC17V04 XC17V08 XC17V16 XC17S50A XC17Vxx/ XC17SxxxA
www.xilinx.com
65
Table 2-149:
Device XC18V02 XC18V04 XC18V512 XC18Vxxx
HTOL Test Results for 0.15 m Si Gate CMOS Device Type 18Vxxx
Lot Quantity 6 9 1 16 Fail Quantity 0 0 0 0 Device Quantity 265 405 45 715 Actual Device Hours at TJ > 125C 265,000 405,000 90,225 760,225 Equivalent Failure Rate at Device Hours 60% CL and at TJ = 125C TJ = 55C (FIT) 303,152 609,828 91,720 1,004,700 25 FIT
Table 2-150:
Device XCF08P XCF16P XCF32P XCF128X XCFxxxS/P
HTOL Test Results for 0.15 m Si Gate CMOS Device Type XCFxxxS/P
Lot Quantity 2 4 5 1 12 Fail Quantity 0 0 0 0 0 Device Quantity 90 122 225 45 482 Actual Device Hours at TJ > 125C 90,000 730,000 225,000 22,500 1,067,500 Equivalent Failure Rate at Device Hours 60% CL and at TJ = 125C TJ = 55C (FIT) 90,000 730,000 263,152 22,500 1,105,652 22 FIT
Summary
Table 2-151: Summary of THB Test Results
Lot Quantity 1 1 11 Fail Quantity 0 0 0 Device Quantity 45 45 559 Total Device Hours 45,000 46,530 932,412
Data
Table 2-152: THB Test Results for Si Gate CMOS Device Type XC17(S)xxx/(X)L/E
Lot Quantity 1 1 Fail Quantity 0 0 Device Quantity 45 45 Total Device Hours 45,000 45,000
66
www.xilinx.com
Table 2-153: THB Test Results for Si Gate CMOS Device Type XC17Vxxx/XC17SxxxA
Device XC17S15A XC17Vxxx/XC17SxxxA Lot Quantity 1 1 Fail Quantity 0 0 Device Quantity 45 45 Total Device Hours 46,530 46,530
Table 2-154:
Summary
Table 2-155: Summary of TH Test Results
Lot Quantity 1 Fail Quantity 0 Device Quantity 44 Total Device Hours 44,812
Device XC17Vxxx
Data
Table 2-156: TH Test Results of Si Gate CMOS Device Type XC17Vxxx/XC17SxxxA
Lot Quantity 1 1 Fail Quantity 0 0 Device Quantity 44 44 Total Device Hours 44,812 44,812
www.xilinx.com
67
Summary
Table 2-157: Summary of Temperature Cycling Test Results
Lot Quantity 2 2 9 10 Fail Quantity 0 0 0 0 Device Quantity 90 90 390 482 Total Device Cycles 90,000 90,000 390,000 780,380
Data
Table 2-158:
Device XC1702L XC17S50XL XC17(S)xxx/(X)L/E
Table 2-159:
Temperature Cycling Test Results for Si Gate CMOS Device Type XC17Vxxx/XC17SxxxA
Stress Condition B: 55C to +125C B: 55C to +125C Lot Quantity 2 2 Fail Quantity 0 0 Device Quantity 90 90 Total Device Cycles 90,000 90,000
Table 2-160:
Temperature Cycling Test Results for Si Gate CMOS Device Type XC18Vxxx
Stress Condition C: 65C to +150C C: 65C to +150C C: 65C to +150C C: 65C to +150C C: 65C to +150C Lot Quantity 2 4 2 1 9 Fail Quantity 0 0 0 0 0 Device Quantity 90 165 90 45 390 Total Device Cycles 90,000 165,000 90,000 45,000 390,000
68
www.xilinx.com
Table 2-161:
Temperature Cycling Test Results for Si Gate CMOS Device Type XCFxxxS/P
Stress Condition C: 65C to +150C C: 65C to +150C C: 65C to +150C Lot Quantity 2 8 10 Fail Quantity 0 0 0 Device Quantity 90 392 482 Total Device Cycles 90,000 636,380 780,380
Autoclave Test
The autoclave test is conducted under the conditions of 121C, 100% RH (unbiased), and 29.7 PSI. Package preconditioning is performed on the testing samples prior to the autoclave stress test.
Summary
Table 2-162: Summary of Autoclave Test Results
Lot Quantity 1 1 11 Fail Quantity 0 0 0 Device Quantity 43 45 957 Total Device Hours 4,128 4,320 91,872
Data
Table 2-163: Autoclave Test Results for Si Gate CMOS Device Type XC17(S)xxx/(X)L/E
Device XC1702L XC17(S)xxx/(X)L/E Lot Quantity 1 1 Fail Quantity 0 0 Device Quantity 43 43 Total Device Hours 4,128 4,128
Table 2-164: Autoclave Test Results for Si Gate CMOS Device Type XC17Vxxx/XC17SxxxA
Device XC17S15A XC17Vxxx/XC17SxxxA Lot Quantity 1 1 Fail Quantity 0 0 Device Quantity 45 45 Total Device Hours 4,320 4,320
www.xilinx.com
69
Table 2-165:
Summary
Table 2-166:
Device XC18Vxxx XCFxxx
Data
Table 2-167:
Device XC18V512 XC18V01 XC18V02 XC18V04 XC18Vxxx
Table 2-168:
Device XCF01S XCF04S XCFxxx
70
www.xilinx.com
Summary
Table 2-169: Summary of HASTU Test Results
Lot Quantity 1 3 9 9 Fail Quantity 0 0 0 0 Device Quantity 45 135 400 405 Total Device Hours 4,320 12,960 38,400 34,560
Data
Table 2-170:
Device XC1702L XC17Sxxx/XL
Table 2-171:
Device XC17S200A XC17SxxxA
Table 2-172:
Device XC18V512 XC18V01 XC18V02 XC18V04 XC18Vxxx
www.xilinx.com
71
Table 2-173:
Device XCF01S XCF04S XCF08P XCF16P XCF32P XCFxxx
Qualification Data
Table 2-174: Program/Erase Endurance Test Results of Si Gate CMOS Device Type XC18Vxxx/XCFxxxS/P
Device XC18V04 XCF08P XCF16P XCF32P Lot Quantity 1 1 2 2 Fail Quantity 0 0 0 0 Device Quantity 32 16 93 93 Total Device Hours 640,000 320,000 1,860,000 1,860,000
Summary
Table 2-175: Summary of Data Retention Bake Test Results
Lot Quantity 2 3 8 10 Fail Quantity 0 0 0 0 Device Quantity 89 135 355 1,210 Total Device Hours 89,000 135,900 355,000 2,018,280
72
www.xilinx.com
Data
Table 2-176: Data Retention Bake Test Results for Si Gate CMOS Device Type XC17(S)xxx/(X)L/E
Device XC1702L XC17S50XL XC17(S)xxx/(X)L/E Lot Quantity 1 1 2 Fail Quantity 0 0 0 Device Quantity 45 44 89 Total Device Cycles 45,000 44,000 89,000
Table 2-177: Data Retention Bake Test Results for Si Gate CMOS Device Type XC17Vxxx/XC17SxxxA
Device XC17S200A XC17Vxxx/XC17SxxxA Lot Quantity 3 3 Fail Quantity 0 0 Device Quantity 135 135 Total Device Hours 135,900 135,900
Data Retention Bake Test Results for Si Gate CMOS Device Type
Lot Quantity 2 3 3 8 Fail Quantity 0 0 0 0 Device Quantity 90 135 130 355 Total Device Hours 90,000 135,000 130,000 355,000
Data Retention Bake Test Results for Si Gate CMOS Device Type
Lot Quantity 1 9 10 Fail Quantity 0 0 0 Device Quantity 45 1,165 1,210 Total Device Hours 45,000 1,943,220 2,018,280
www.xilinx.com
73
CPLD Products
HTOL Tests
The HTOL test is conducted under the conditions of TJ > 125C temperature, maximum VDD, and either dynamic or static operation. The FIT calculations in Table 2-180 through Table 2-185 are based on the assumption of 0.7 eV activation energy and 60% confidence level.
Summary
Table 2-180:
Device XC95xxx XC95xxxXL XC95xxxXV XCRxxxXL XC2Cxxx/A
Notes:
1. Failures listed in this table are also listed in each family device table with failure analysis results in the footnote.
Data
Table 2-181:
Device XC95108 XC95288 XC9572 XC95xxx
HTOL Test Results for 0.5 m Si Gate CMOS Device Type XC95xxx
Lot Quantity 3 1 4 8 Fail Quantity 0 0 0 0 Device Quantity 135 45 165 345 Actual Device Hours at TJ > 125C 252,720 90,045 331,120 673,885 Equivalent Failure Rate at Device Hours 60% CL and at TJ = 125C TJ = 55C (FIT) 436,538 149,871 430,104 1,016,513 12 FIT
Table 2-182:
Device XC951288XL XC95144XL XC95288XL XC9572XL XC95xxxXL
74
www.xilinx.com
CPLD Products
Table 2-183:
Device XC9572XV XC95144XV XC95288XV XC95xxxXV
Table 2-184:
Devices XCR3032XL XCR3128XL XCR3256XL XCR3384XL XCR3512XL XCRxxxXL
Notes:
Table 2-185:
Device XC2C64A XC2C128 XC2C256 XC2C384 XC2C512 XC2Cxxx/A
www.xilinx.com
75
Summary
Table 2-186:
Device XC95xxxXL XC95288XV XC2Cxxx/A
Data
Table 2-187:
Device XC95144XL XC95xxxXL
Table 2-188:
Device XC95288XV
Table 2-189:
Device XC2C64A XC2C128 XC2C256
XC2Cxxx/A
76
www.xilinx.com
CPLD Products
Summary
Table 2-190:
Device XC95xxx XC95xxxXL XCRxxxXL XC2Cxxx/A
Data
Table 2-191:
Device XC95144 XC95xxx
Table 2-192:
Device XC9572XL XC95144XL XC95xxxXL
Table 2-193:
Device
XCR3256XL XCRxxxXL
Table 2-194:
Device XC2C64A XC2C256
XC2Cxxx/A
www.xilinx.com
77
Summary
Table 2-195:
Device XC95xxx XC95xxxXL XC95xxxXV XCRxxxXL XC2Cxxx/A
Data
Table 2-196:
Device XC9572 XC95xxx
Temperature Cycling Test Results for Si Gate CMOS Device Type XC95xxx
Stress Condition B: 55C to +125C B: 55C to +125C Lot Quantity 2 2 Fail Quantity 0 0 Device Quantity 90 90 Total Device Cycles 90,000 90,000
Table 2-197:
Device
Temperature Cycling Test Results for Si Gate CMOS Device Type XC95xxxL
Stress Condition B: 55C to +125C B: 55C to +125C B: 55C to +125C B: 55C to +125C Lot Quantity 1 2 4 7 Fail Quantity 0 0 0 0 Device Quantity 45 90 180 315 Total Device Cycles 45,000 90,000 181,350 316,350
Table 2-198:
Device
Temperature Cycling Test Results for Si Gate CMOS Device Type XC95xxxXV
Stress Condition B: 55C to +125C Lot Quantity 1 Fail Quantity 0 Device Quantity 45 Total Device Cycles 45,360
XC95288XV
78
www.xilinx.com
CPLD Products
Table 2-199:
Device XCR3256X
XCRxxxXL
Table 2-200:
Device XC2C64A XC2C32A XC2C64 XC2C128 XC2C256 XC2C384
XC2Cxxx/A
Autoclave Test
The autoclave test is conducted under the conditions of 121C, 100% RH (unbiased), and 29.7 PSI. Package preconditioning is performed on the testing samples prior to the autoclave stress test.
Summary
Table 2-201:
Device XC95xxxXL XC2Cxxx
www.xilinx.com
79
Data
Table 2-202:
Device XC9572XL
Table 2-203:
Device XC2C128
Summary
Table 2-204:
Device XC95xxx XC95xxxXL XC95xxxXV XCRxxxXL XC2Cxxx/A
Data
Table 2-205:
Device XC9572 XC95xxx
Table 2-206:
Device XC95144XL XC95288XL
80
www.xilinx.com
CPLD Products
Table 2-206:
Device XC9572XL XC95xxxXL
Table 2-207:
Device XC95144XV
XC95xxxXV
Table 2-208:
Device
XCR3256XL XCRxxxXL
Table 2-209:
Device XC2C128 XC2C256 XC2C384 XC2C32A XC2C64A
XC2Cxxx/A
Qualification Data
Table 2-210: Erase Endurance Test Results for Si Gate CMOS Device Type XC95xxx; Test Condition at 55C
Device XC9536 XC95108 XC95xxx Lot Quantity 1 1 2 Fail Quantity 0 0 0 Device Quantity 29 80 109 Total Device Hours 290,000 875,120 1,165,120
www.xilinx.com
81
Table 2-211: Erase Endurance Test Results for Si Gate CMOS Device Type XC95xxx; Test Condition at 40C
Device XC9536 Lot Quantity 2 Fail Quantity 0 Device Quantity 64 Total Device Hours 5,088,000
Table 2-212: Erase Endurance Test Results for Si Gate CMOS Device Type XC95xxxXL; Test Condition at 40C
Device XC95144XL Lot Quantity 1 Fail Quantity 0 Device Quantity 21 Total Device Hours 420,000
Table 2-213: Erase Endurance Test Results for Si Gate CMOS Device Type XC95xxxXL; Test Condition at 70C
Device XC95144XL Lot Quantity 1 Fail Quantity 0 Device Quantity 32 Total Device Hours 320,000
Table 2-214: Erase Endurance Test Results for Si Gate CMOS Device Type XC95xxxXV; Test Condition at 70C
Device XC95144XV Lot Quantity 1 Fail Quantity 0 Device Quantity 32 Total Device Hours 320,000
XCR3032XL
Summary
Table 2-216:
Device XC95xxx XC95xxxXL XC95xxxXV
82
www.xilinx.com
CPLD Products
Table 2-216:
Device XCRxxxXL
XC2Cxxx/A
Notes:
1. Failures listed in this table are also listed in each family device table with failure analysis results in the footnote.
Data
Table 2-217: XC95xxx
Device XC9572 XC95xxx
Data Retention Bake Test Results for Si Gate CMOS Device Type
Lot Quantity 3 3 Fail Quantity 0 0 Device Quantity 135 135 Total Device Hours 135,000 135,000
Data Retention Bake Test Results for Si Gate CMOS Device Type
Lot Quantity 4 1 2 7 Fail Quantity 0 0 0 0 Device Quantity 180 45 90 315 Total Device Hours 180,000 45,000 90,000 315,000
Table 2-219: Data Retention Bake Test Results for Si Gate CMOS Device Type XC95xxxXV
Device XC95144XV XC95xxxXV
Notes:
1. The device failure was due to a bond ball alignment issue. An improvement process change has been implemented.
Lot Quantity 1 1
Device Quantity 43 43
XCR3128XL
www.xilinx.com
83
Table 2-220: Data Retention Bake Test Results of Si Gate CMOS Device Type XCRxxxXL (Contd)
Device XCR3256XL XCRxxxXL Lot Quantity 1 2 Fail Quantity 0 0 Device Quantity 45 90 Total Device Hours 45,000 90,000
XC2Cxxx/A
84
www.xilinx.com
Chapter 3
Lot Quantity 1 1 1
Failures 0 0 0
Device on Test 45 45 45
SO20
Table 3-2: Test Results for Device Types XC17S50A, XC17S100A/XL, and XC18V01
Reliability Test
Temperature cycling 55C to +125C
Lot Quantity 1 1 1
Failures 0 0 0
Device on Test 44 45 45
Lot Quantity 2 2
Failures 0 0
Device on Test 90 90
www.xilinx.com
85
Table 3-3:
Test Results for Device Types XCF08P, XCF32P, XC18V01, XC18V02, and XC18V04 (Contd)
Reliability Test PP HTS Lot Quantity 2 1 Failures 0 0 Device on Test 90 45 Total Device Hours/Cycles 8,640 75,060
Lot Quantity 1 1 1
Failures 0 0 0
Device on Test 45 45 45
HASTU HTS
Lot Quantity 5 1 1 2 4
Failures 0 0 0 0 0
Temperature humidity 85C, 85% RH with bias Temperature humidity 85C, 85% RH no bias HASTU HTS
TQ100, TQ144
Table 3-6: Test Results for Device Types XC2C256, XC2C384, XC2S50E, XC2S100/E, XC3S50A, XC3S200, XC3S400, and XC95288XL
Reliability Test
Temperature cycling 55C to +125C
Lot Quantity 6 1
Failures 0 0
86
www.xilinx.com
Table 3-6: Test Results for Device Types XC2C256, XC2C384, XC2S50E, XC2S100/E, XC3S50A, XC3S200, XC3S400, and XC95288XL (Contd)
Reliability Test Temperature humidity 85C, 85% RH no bias HASTU HTS Lot Quantity 2 3 7 Failures 0 0 0 Device on Test 75 134 270 Total Device Hours/Cycles 75,600 12,864 273,240
VQ44, VQ100
Table 3-7: Test Results for Device Types XC1702L, XC17V04, XC18V02, XC18V04, XC2C128, XCS30, XCS20XL, XC9572XL, XC3S200, and XC3S250E
Reliability Test
Temperature cycling 55C to +125C
Lot Quantity 3 1 2 4 3
Failures 0 0 0 0 0
Autoclave 121C, 100% RH Temperature humidity 85C, 85% RH no bias HASTU HTS
HQ208, HQ240
Table 3-8: Test Results for Device Types XCV400 (Shrink), XCV600 (Shrink), XCV600E, XC95216, XC95288, and XC4028EX
Reliability Test
Temperature cycling 55C to +125C
Lot Quantity 1 1 1 1
Failures 0 0 0 0
Device on Test 45 40 45 45
www.xilinx.com
87
BG256
Table 3-9: Test Results for Device Type XCS40XL
Reliability Test
Temperature cycling 55C to +125C
Lot Quantity 1 1 1
Failures 0 0 0
Device on Test 45 45 45
HTS HASTU
Reliability Test
Temperature cycling 55C to +125C
Temperature humidity 85C, 85% RH with bias HASTU HTS Temperature humidity 85C, 85% RH no bias
CS280
Table 3-11: Test Results for Device Types XC95288XL, XC95288XV, XCR3256XL, and XCR3512XL
Lot Quantity 2 1 1 2 Failures 0 0 0 0 Device on Test 90 24 45 90 Total Device Hours/Cycles 90,000 24,240 4,320 90,000
Reliability Test
Temperature cycling 55C to +125C
88
www.xilinx.com
CS324
Table 3-12: Test Results for Device Types XC6SLX16, XC6SLX45T, and XC6SLX45
Lot Quantity 3 9 Failures 0 0 Device on Test 86 295 Total Device Hours/Cycles 8,148 299,013
CP56
Table 3-13: Test Results for Device Type XCR3064XL
Lot Quantity 1 1 1 Failures 0 0 0 Device on Test 77 77 77 Total Device Hours/Cycles 88,088 77,539 7,392
Reliability Test
Temperature cycling 55C to +125C
HTS HASTU
CP132
Table 3-14: Test Results for Device Types XC2C128, XC2C256, and XC2S300E
Lot Quantity 1 1 1 2 Failures 0 0 0 0 Device on Test 45 45 45 90 Total Device Hours/Cycles 45,000 45,000 4,320 90,000
Reliability Test
Temperature cycling 55C to +125C
FS48
Table 3-15: Test Results for Device Types XCF08P, XCF16P, and XCF32P
Lot Quantity 7 8 8 8 Failures 0 0 0 0 Device on Test 424 424 822 1,120 Total Device Hours/Cycles 561,320 707,232 78,912 1,868,160
Reliability Test
Temperature cycling 65C to +150C
www.xilinx.com
89
FG256
Table 3-16: Test Results for Device Types XC2V80, XC2V250, XC2V500, and XCV1000
Lot Quantity 1 Failures 0 Device on Test 45 Total Device Hours/Cycles 4,320
FG320
Table 3-17: Test Results for Device Types XC3S1500
Lot Quantity 1 1 1 Failures 0 0 0 Device on Test 45 45 45 Total Device Hours/Cycles 45,540 45,000 45,315
Lot Quantity 7 1 7 5 8 2
Failures 0 0 0 0 0 0
FG676
Table 3-19: Test Results for Device Types XC2VP20, XC3S1400A, XC3S1500, XC3SD1800A, XC6SLX150T, XC3SD3400A, XCE2V2000, and XCV600E
Reliability Test
Temperature cycling 55C to +125C
Lot Quantity 8 4
Failures 0 0
HAST
90
www.xilinx.com
Table 3-19: Test Results for Device Types XC2VP20, XC3S1400A, XC3S1500, XC3SD1800A, XC6SLX150T, XC3SD3400A, XCE2V2000, and XCV600E (Contd)
Reliability Test HASTU HTS Lot Quantity 4 5 Failures 0 0 Device on Test 180 222 Total Device Hours/Cycles 17,280 222,000
FG680
Table 3-20: Test Results for Device Types XCV2000E, and XCV1000E
Lot Quantity 2 2 2 Failures 0 0 0 Device on Test 89 88 89 Total Device Hours/Cycles 91,250 8,448 89,000
Reliability Test
Temperature cycling 55C to +125C
HASTU HTS
FG900
Table 3-21: Test Results for Device Type XC6SLX150T
Lot Quantity 3 Failures 0 Device on Test 88 Total Device Hours/Cycles 90,793
Reliability Test
Temperature cycling 55C to +125C
FG1156
Table 3-22: Test Results for Device Types XCV2000E, and XCV1600E
Lot Quantity 1 Failures 0 Device on Test 48 Total Device Hours/Cycles 49,824
Reliability Test
Temperature cycling 55C to +125C
FT256
Table 3-23: Test Results for Device Types XCR3512XL, XC2S150E, XC2S300E, XC2S400E, XC2C512, XC3S1000, XC3S400A, XC3S1200E, XC3S200AN, XC3S200, XC3S50A, and XC3S200A
Reliability Test Temperature cycling 55C to +125C Autoclave 121C, 100% RH HASTU Lot Quantity 3 1 3 Failures 0 0 0 Device on Test 135 44 135 Total Device Hours/Cycles 136,080 4,224 12,960
www.xilinx.com
91
Table 3-23: Test Results for Device Types XCR3512XL, XC2S150E, XC2S300E, XC2S400E, XC2C512, XC3S1000, XC3S400A, XC3S1200E, XC3S200AN, XC3S200, XC3S50A, and XC3S200A (Contd)
Reliability Test Temperature humidity 85C, 85% RH no bias HTS Lot Quantity 1 3 Failures 0 0 Device on Test 45 134 Total Device Hours/Cycles 47,745 134,000
FF668
Table 3-24: Test Results for Device Types XC4VLX25, XC4VLX60, and XC4VFX20
Lot Quantity 1 2 1 1 Failures 0 0 0 0 Device on Test 45 90 45 44 Total Device Hours/Cycles 4,320 90,000 45,360 44,000
FF484, FF784
Table 3-25: Test Results for Device Types XC6VLX130T and XC6VLX240T
Lot Quantity 6 Failures 0 Device on Test 185 Total Device Hours/Cycles 185,692
Lot Quantity 1 10 1 10
Failures 0 0 0 0
92
www.xilinx.com
FF1156
Table 3-27: Test Results for Device Types XC6VSX475T, XC6VLX240T, XC6VLX115T(1), XC6VLX195T and XC6VLX130T
Reliability Test HTS
TCB
Lot Quantity 5 10 5 9
Failures 0 0 0 0
TH THB
Notes:
FF1923
Table 3-28: Test Results for Device Types XC6VHX565T, XC6VHX255T and XC6VHX380T
Lot Quantity 9 3 3 3 Failures 1(1) 0 0 0 Device on Test 148 74 74 72 Total Device Hours/Cycles 148,000 74,000 74,000 72,000
Reliability Test
Temperature cycling 55C to +125C
Temperature humidity 85C, 85% RH with bias Temperature humidity 85C, 85% RH no bias High temperature storage
Notes:
1. One unit failed at post temperature cycling stress was due to a solder particle at bump. Post bump cleaning improvement is being implemented.
FF1513, FF1517
Table 3-29: Test Results for Device Types XC2V6000, XC2V8000, XC2VP50, XC2VP70, XC4VLX100, XC4VLX200, XC4VLX160, and XC4VLX200
Reliability Test HTS HASTU
Temperature cycling 55C to +125C
Lot Quantity 1 1 1
Failures 0 0 0
Device on Test 45 45 45
www.xilinx.com
93
FF1704
Table 3-30: Test Results for Device Types XC2VP100 and XC2VP70
Lot Quantity 1 2 Failures 0 0 Device on Test 49 153 Total Device Hours/Cycles 49,747 154,955
FF1759, FF1760
Table 3-31: Test Results for Device Types XC6VLX240T, XC6VLX475T and XC6VLX760
Lot Quantity 4 Failures 0 Device on Test 102 Total Device Hours/Cycles 103,601
Reliability Test
TCB
SF363
Table 3-32: Test Results for Device Type XC4VLX25
Lot Quantity 1 1 Failures 0 0 Device on Test 45 45 Total Device Hours/Cycles 45,000 45,000
Reliability Test
Temperature cycling 55C to +125C
94
www.xilinx.com
Table 3-33: Tests of Package Types PG84, PG120, PG132, PG156, PG175, PG191, PG223, PG299, and PG475 (Contd)
Code Test Thermal shock Temperature cycle D3 Seal Visual examination End-point electrical Parametrics Mechanical shock Vibration, variable frequency D4 Constant acceleration Seal Visual examination End-point electrical parameters Salt atmosphere D5 Seal Visual examination D6 D7 D8 Internal water-vapor content Adhesion of lead finish Lid Torque 30 30 15 0 0 0 30 0 30 0 Sample Quantity 30 Failures 0 Total Device Cycles 450
www.xilinx.com
95
D3
Seal Visual examination End-Point electrical Parametrics Mechanical shock Vibration, variable frequency 60 0
D4
Constant acceleration Seal Visual examination End-point electrical parameters Salt atmosphere 60 0
D5
D6 D7 D8-LID HTOL
Internal water-vapor content Adhesion of lead finish Lid Torque Life Test
60 60 30 45
0 0 0 0
96
www.xilinx.com
D3
Seal Visual examination End-point electrical Parametrics Mechanical shock Vibration, variable frequency 30 0
D4
Constant acceleration Seal Visual examination End-point electrical parameters Salt atmosphere 30 0
D5
D6 D7 D8
30 30 15
0 0 0
www.xilinx.com
97
D3
Seal Visual examination End-point electrical Parametrics Mechanical shock Vibration, variable frequency 15 0
D4
Constant acceleration Seal Visual examination End-point electrical parameters Salt atmosphere 30 0
D5
D6 D7 D8
20 18 15
0 0 0
98
www.xilinx.com
D3
D4
Sample Quantity 15 15 15 22 15 44
Failures 0 0 0 0 0 0
HTOL
www.xilinx.com
99
BGG256
Table 3-40: Test Results for Device Type XCS40XL
Lot Quantity 1 1 1 Failures 0 0 0 Device on Test 45 45 45 Total Device Hours/Cycles 4,320 45,000 45,000
Reliability Test
Temperature cycling
Lot Quantity 1 1 1
Failures 0 0 0
Device on Test 21 45 45
CPG132
Table 3-42: Test Results for Device Types XC2C256, XC2C128, XC3S50, XC3S250E, and XC3S500E
Lot Quantity 14 3 10 14 Failures 0 0 0 0 Device on Test 627 135 450 630 Total Device Hours/Cycles 627,000 135,000 38,880 633,240
Reliability Test
Temperature cycling
CPG196
Table 3-43: Test Results for Device Type XC6SLX16
Lot Quantity 5 2 1 Failures 0 0 0 Device on Test 180 90 44 Total Device Hours/Cycles 180,990 8,640 44,000
Reliability Test
Temperature cycling
100
www.xilinx.com
CSG144
Table 3-44: Test Results of Device Types XC95144XL, XCR3128XL, and XCV200E
Lot Quantity 2 2 2 Failures 0 0 0 Device on Test 90 90 90 Total Device Hours/Cycles 90,000 8,640 90,000
Reliability Test
Temperature cycling
CSG280
Table 3-45: Test Results of Device Types XC95288XV, XCR3512XL, and XCR3256XL
Lot Quantity 2 1 2 1 Failures 0 0 0 0 Device on Test 90 45 90 24 Total Device Hours/Cycles 90,000 4,320 90,000 24,240
Reliability Test
Temperature cycling
CSG324
Table 3-46: Test Results of Device Types XC6SLX16, XC6SLX45, and XC6SLX45T
Lot Quantity 10 4 1 Failures 0 0 0 Device on Test 340 131 45 Total Device Hours/Cycles 344,013 20,028 45,000
Reliability Test
Temperature cycling
CSG484
Table 3-47: Test Results of Device Type XC6SLX150T
Lot Quantity 4 1 1 Failures 0 0 0 Device on Test 129 45 45 Total Device Hours/Cycles 129,788 11,880 45,000
Reliability Test
Temperature cycling
www.xilinx.com
101
FGG256
Table 3-48: Test Results of Device Types XCV300E (Shrink), and XC2V500
Lot Quantity 1 1 Failures 0 0 Device on Test 43 43 Total Device Hours/Cycles 48,504 43,301
Reliability Test
Temperature cycling
FGG320
Table 3-49: Test Results of Device Types XC3S1500 and XC3S1600E
Lot Quantity 1 1 1 1 Failures 0 0 0 0 Device on Test 45 45 45 45 Total Device Hours/Cycles 4,320 45,315 45,900 45,000
55 to +125C HTS
FGG400
Table 3-50: Test Results of Device Type XC3S1600E
Lot Quantity 4 4 4 Failures 0 0 0 Device on Test 179 180 180 Total Device Hours/Cycles 179,000 17,280 180,000
Reliability Test
Temperature cycling
Lot Quantity 15 1 1
Failures 0 0 0
102
www.xilinx.com
Table 3-51: Test Results of Device Types XC2V250, XC2VP4, XC2S300E, XC3S1500, XC3S1600E, XC3S700AN, XC3S1400AN, XC6SLX45T, and XC6SLX150T (Contd)
Reliability Test HAST HASTU HTS Lot Quantity 6 12 14 Failures 0 0 0 Device on Test 319 627 547 Total Device Hours/Cycles 45,240 60,192 547,657
FGG676
Table 3-52: Test Results of Device Types XCV405E, XCV800, XCV600E, XC2V3000, XC2VP20, XC2VP30, XC2VP40, XC2S600E, XC3S1500, XC3S2000, XC3S1400A, XC3S1400AN, XC3SD1800A, XC6SLX150T, and XC3SD3400A
Reliability Test
Temperature cycling
Lot Quantity 12 1 2 10 9
Failures 0 0 0 0 0
55 to +125C Temperature humidity 85C, 85% RH with bias HAST HASTU HTS
FGG680
Table 3-53: Test Results of Device Type XCV1000E (Shrink)
Lot Quantity 1 1 1 Failures 0 0 0 Device on Test 45 45 45 Total Device Hours/Cycles 45,900 4,320 45,000
Reliability Test
Temperature cycling
FGG900
Table 3-54: Test Results of Device Type XC6SLX150T
Lot Quantity 4 1 1 Failures 0 0 0 Device on Test 133 45 45 Total Device Hours/Cycles 135,793 4,320 45,000
Reliability Test
Temperature cycling
www.xilinx.com
103
FGG1156
Table 3-55: Test Results of Device Types XCV2000E (Shrink), XCV1600E, XC3S4000, and XC3S5000
Lot Quantity 1 Failures 0 Device on Test 48 Total Device Hours/Cycles 49,824
Reliability Test
Temperature cycling
55 to +125C
FTG256
Table 3-56: Test Results for Device Types XCR3512XL, XC2C512, XC2S150E, XC3S250E, XC2S300E, XC2S400E, XC3S1000, XC3S50A, XC3S200A, XC3S400A, XCR3512XL, and XC3S200AN
Reliability Test
Temperature cycling
Lot Quantity 19 2 1 2 15 16
Failures 0 0 0 0 0 0
55 to +125C Temperature humidity 85C, 85% RH with bias Temperature humidity 85C, 85% RH no bias HAST HASTU HTS
PQG160, PQG208
Table 3-57: Test Results of Device Types XC95144, XC95216, XCS40XL, XC2S200, XC2S300E, XC3S400, and XC3S500E
Reliability Test
Temperature cycling
Lot Quantity 5 1 1 4 5
Failures 0 0 0 0 0
55 to +125C Temperature humidity 85C, 85% RH with bias Temperature humidity 85C, 85% RH no bias HASTU HTS
104
www.xilinx.com
HQG240, HQG208
Table 3-58: Test Results of Device Types XCV1000E (Shrink), XC5215, XCV600, XCV600E, XC4085XLA, and XC95216
Reliability Test
Temperature cycling
Lot Quantity 1 1 1
Failures 0 0 0
Device on Test 45 45 45
PCG44, PCG84
Table 3-59: Test Results for Device Types XC9572XL, XCS05, XC18V02, and XC1702L
Lot Quantity 1 1 1 Failures 0 0 0 Device on Test 45 45 45 Total Device Hours/Cycles 45,000 45,000 4,320
Reliability Test
Temperature cycling
SOG20
Table 3-60: Test Results for Device Types XC17S50A, XC17S100A, and XC18V01
Lot Quantity 1 1 Failures 0 0 Device on Test 45 45 Total Device Hours/Cycles 45,000 45,000
Reliability Test
Temperature cycling
55 to +125C HTS
Lot Quantity 15 4 2
Failures 0 0 0
55 to +125C Temperature humidity 85C, 85% RH with bias Temperature humidity 85C, 85% RH no bias
www.xilinx.com
105
Table 3-61: Test Results of Device Types XCS30XL, XC18V02, XC18V04, XC2C64A, XC2C128, XC2C256, XC9572XL, XC3S200, XC3S250E, and XC3S100E (Contd)
Reliability Test HASTU HTS Lot Quantity 15 18 Failures 0 0 Device on Test 720 810 Total Device Hours/Cycles 60,480 768,240
VOG20, VOG48
Table 3-62: Test Results of Device Types XCF01S, XCF02S, XCF04S, XCF08P, XCF16P, and XCF32P
Lot Quantity 1 Failures 0 Device on Test 90 Total Device Hours/Cycles 90,000
TQG100, TQG144
Table 3-63: Test Results of Device Types XC2S100, XC95144XL, XC95288XL, XC2C384, XC3S50A, XC3S200, XC3S400, XC3S100E, XC3S250E, XC4010XL, and XC3S50AN
Reliability Test
Temperature cycling
Lot Quantity 18 3 2 11 18
Failures 0 0 0 0 0
55 to +125C Temperature humidity 85C, 85% RH with bias Temperature humidity 85C, 85% RH no bias HASTU HTS
FFG668
Table 3-64: Test Results of Device Types XC4VLX60
Lot Quantity 8 1 1 1 Failures 0 0 0 0 Device on Test 314 45 45 45 Total Device Hours/Cycles 314,000 45,360 4,320 45,000
Reliability Test
Temperature cycling
106
www.xilinx.com
FFG484, FFG784
Table 3-65: Test Results of Device Types XC6VLX130T and XC6VLX240T
Lot Quantity 11 Failures 0 Device on Test 310 Total Device Hours/Cycles 310,692
Reliability Test
Temperature cycling
55 to +125C
Lot Quantity 21 17 1 2
Failures 0 0 0 0
FFG1759, FFG1760
Table 3-67: Test Results of Device Types XC6VSX475T, XC6VLX760 and XC6VLX240T
Lot Quantity 13 Failures 0 Device on Test 326 Total Device Hours/Cycles 327,601
Reliability Test
Temperature cycling
55 to +125C
FFG1156
Table 3-68: Test Results of Device Types XC6VLX115(1)T, XC6VLX130T, XC6VLX365T, XC6VSX475T, XC6VLX195T and XC6VLX240T
Reliability Test HTS
Temperature cycling
Lot Quantity 6 27 9 15
Failures 0 0 0 0
55 to +125C Temperature humidity 85C, 85% RH no bias Temperature humidity 85C, 85% RH with bias
Notes:
www.xilinx.com
107
FFG1923
Table 3-69: Test Results of Device Types XC6VHX565T, XC6VHX255T and XC6VHX380T
Lot Quantity 10 4 3 3 Failures 1(1) 0 0 0 Device on Test 192 118 74 72 Total Device Hours/Cycles 192,850 120,073 74,345 72,000
Reliability Test
Temperature cycling
55 to +125C Temperature humidity 85C, 85% RH with bias Temperature humidity 85C, 85% RH no bias High temperature storage
Notes:
1. One unit failed at post temperature cycling stress was due to a solder particle at bump. Post bump cleaning improvement is being implemented.
FFG1513, FFG1517
Table 3-70: Test Results of Device Types XCE2VP50, XC2V6000, XC2VP50, XC2VP70, XC4VLX100, XC4VLX160, and XC4VLX200
Reliability Test
Temperature cycling
Lot Quantity 2
Failures 0
55 to +125C
FFG1704
Table 3-71: Test Results of Device Types XC2VP70 and XC2VP100
Lot Quantity 1 2 Failures 0 0 Device on Test 49 153 Total Device Hours/Cycles 49,747 154,955
55 to +125C
FFG324
Table 3-72: Test Results of Device Types XC5VLX50
Lot Quantity 1 Failures 0 Device on Test 49 Total Device Hours/Cycles 50,617
Reliability Test
Temperature cycling
55 to +125C
108
www.xilinx.com
FFG900
Table 3-73: Test Results of Device Type XC7K325T
Lot Quantity 3 6 3 3 Failures 0 0 0 0 Device on Test 75 147 75 75 Total Device Hours/Cycles 75,000 147,000 75,000 75,000
Reliability Test
Temperature cycling
55 to +125C Temperature humidity 85C, 85% RH with bias Temperature humidity 85C, 85% RH no bias High temperature storage
FFG1738
Table 3-74: Test Results of Device Types XC5VLX330T
Lot Quantity 3 Failures 0 Device on Test 74 Total Device Hours/Cycles 74,000
Reliability Test
Temperature cycling
55 to +125C
SFG363
Table 3-75: Test Results of Device Types XC4VLX25
Lot Quantity 3 2 1 Failures 0 0 0 Device on Test 139 90 45 Total Device Hours/Cycles 139,000 90,000 45,000
Reliability Test
Temperature cycling
55 to +125C Temperature humidity 85C, 85% RH with bias Temperature humidity 85C, 85% RH no bias
www.xilinx.com
109
FG676 FG680 FG900 FG1156 BF957 FF672 FF896 FF1152 FF1704 SF363 CF1144
27 x 27 40 x 40 31 x 31 35 x 35 40 x 40 27 x 27 31 x 31 35 x 35 42.5 x 42.5 17 x 17 35 x 35
676 680 900 1,156 957 672 896 1,152 1,704 363 1,144
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.27 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.8 1.00
SMD SMD SMD SMD SMD SMD SMD SMD SMD SMD SMD
17.8 x 17.8 x 0.3 20.3 x 20.3 x 0.3 17.0 x 17.0 x 0.3 23 x 21 x 0.3 22 x 20 x 0.7 12 x 10 x 0.7 10 x 10 x 0.7 22 x 20 x 0.7 26 x 22 x 0.7 10 x 10 x 0.3 22 x 20 x 0.7
Test Condition
0C 100C, 10 minutes dwells, 5 minutes ramps, 2 cycles/hour
110
www.xilinx.com
Failure Criteria
Table 3-77: Continuous scanning of daisy chain nets (every 2 minutes) OPEN: Resistance of net > threshold resistance (300) FAIL: At least 2 opens within one cycle, log 15 failures for each net
Package FG676 FG680 FG900 FG1156 BF957 FF672 FF896 FF1152 FF1704 SF363 (Lot 1) SF363 (Lot 2) CF1144
www.xilinx.com
111
Weibull Plots
X-Ref Target - Figure 3-1
99.00
Cumulative % Failed
50.00
10.00 5.00
1.00 1000.00
10000.00
Cycles to Failure
=11.01, =6012.65
UG116_c3_01_0528 09
Figure 3-1:
X-Ref Target - Figure 3-2
Cumulative % Failed
50.0
10.0 5.0
1.0 1000.0
10000.0
Cycles to Failure
=8.46, =5344.4
UG116_c3_02_052709
Figure 3-2:
112
www.xilinx.com
90 80 70 60 50 40
Occurence CDF %
30 20
10 5
2 1 1000
Test Cycles
= 6.713 = 4,892 r2 = 0.973 n/s = 39/14
UG116_c3_03_0528 09
Figure 3-3:
X-Ref Target - Figure 3-4
Cumulative % Failed
50.00
10.00
10000.00
Cycles to Failure
1=7.33, 1=3662.67, =0.9589
UG116_c3_04_0528 09
Figure 3-4:
www.xilinx.com
113
Cumulative % Failed
50.00
10.00 5.00
1.00 2000.00
9000.00
Cycles to Failure
FF672 2VP7 BLR TCA Test
UG116_c3_05_052709
Figure 3-5:
X-Ref Target - Figure 3-6
99.00 90.00
P=2 F = 10 S = 2
Cumulative % Failure
50.00
10.00 5.00
1.00 1000.00
10000.00
Cycles to Failure
=14.53 = 6783.77
UG116_c3_06_0528 09
Figure 3-6:
114
www.xilinx.com
Cumulative % Failed
50.00
10.00 5.00
1.00 1000.00
10000.00
Cycles to Failure
=11.9146, = 3822/1219. p=0.9685
UG116_c3_07_052709
Figure 3-7:
X-Ref Target - Figure 3-8
99.00 90.00
LX25 SF363 (Lot #2) F=24 / S=0 LX25-SF363 (Lot #1) F=21 / S=3
Cumulative % Failed
50.00
10.00 5.00
1.00 1000.00
10000.00
Cycles to Failure
1=14.9811, 1=2048.4279, =0.9921 2=10.5433, 2=1999.5023, =0.9360
UG116_c3_0 8 _052709
Figure 3-8:
www.xilinx.com
115
50.00
10.00 5.00
1.00 1000.00
10000.00
Cycles to Failure
=19.1835, =3389.4518, =0.8659
UG116_c3_09_0528 09
Figure 3-9:
116
www.xilinx.com
Test Condition
FGG676: 0C 100C, 40-minute thermal cycle, 10 minutes dwells, 10C/minute ramp rate FFG1152: 0C 100C, 10 minutes dwells, 5 minutes ramps, 2 cycles/hour
Failure Criteria
Table 3-79: Continuous scanning of daisy chain nets (every 2 minutes) OPEN: resistance of net > threshold resistance (300) FAIL: At least 2 opens within one cycle, log 15 failures for each net
www.xilinx.com
117
Weibull Plots
X-Ref Target - Figure 3-10
99.00 90.00
SnAgCu Sphere [SnPb Paste] [215C Peak] SnAgCu Sphere [SnPb Paste] [205C Peak] SnAgCu Sphere [SnAgCu Paste] [235C Peak] Eta Beta 9.3090 12.0093 r^2
50.00
Figure 3-10:
X-Ref Target - Figure 3-11
Cumulative % Failed
Figure 3-11:
10.00 5.00
4.639 5.797
W2P/RRX
1.00 1000.00
10000.00
Cycles to Failure
UG116_c3_10_102908
50.0
10.0 5.0
1.0 1000.00
Cycles to Failure
10000.00
UG116_c3_11_052709
118
www.xilinx.com