OFFER MEMO FOR CMS CROSSING Name of the Firm Offer Memo No./CMS ..Serial no.

. of crossing Contract No. . Date... .. Drawing No. RDSO/T----------------Alt. . Type 1 in BG ..Kg . Heat No. .Date of casting ... No. of castings ..

ANNEXURE - II

Offer Memo No. 1 Date of offer (To witness the sample of Molten metal in case of prototype inspection and to verify chemistry from lug sample for developmental inspection).

Offer Memo No.2 Date of offer (To witness the casting for prototype manufacturing and for developmental inspection to verify the data of casting).

Offer Memo No. 3 Date of offer (To inspect the surface visually after knockout, demoulding & cleaning by Shot blasting )

Offer Memo No. 4 Date of offer (To inspect after shot blasting after heat treatment)

1. Chemical analysis (% of elements)

SPECIFI ED 1.0 1.4 11.0 14.0 0.060 Max. 0.030 Max. 0.50 Max. Eleme BT BP nts EP

C Mn P S Si

( BT-Before Tapping, BP-Beginning of Pouring, EP-End of Pouring,) 2.Temperature in 0C

Melting Tapping Pouring

4.

3. Certified that the material obtained from the above heat conforms to IRS/T-29/2000 & latest amendments in respect of Chemical Analysis.

1. Details of Integral 1. Surface defects, if test bars stamped by any, (Metallurgical). RDSO a) No appreciable defects . Or b) See sketch attached . 2. Dimensional deficiencies, . if any on gross dimensional check of crossing. . 3. Certified that this crossing is satisfactory from Gross 2. Chemical analysis (% of dimensional as well as elements) metallurgical SPECIFI Eleme BT BP EP LUG* considerations and hence ED nts 1.0 1.4 C process able under normal 11.0 14.0 conditions Mn
0.060 Max. 0.030 Max. 0.50 Max.

1. Surface defects if any (Metallurgical) a) No appreciable defects Or b)See sketch attached 2. Dimensional deficiencies, if any on gross dimensional check of crossing.

P S Si

QC Officer/Firms Name 4. Certified that this crossing is satisfactory metallurgical considerations and hence process able under normal conditions

Certified that this crossing is satisfactory from Gross dimensional as well as metallurgical considerations and considered fit for further processing.

3. Sequence of Pouring of casting Sn Drg. No. Casting no. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 4

Any other remark Any other remark ARO/M&C/RDSO

obtained from the above heat conforms to IRS/T-29/2000 & latest amendments in respect of Chemical Analysis.

5. Certified that this crossing QC Officer/Firms Name is satisfactory from Gross dimensional process able Certified that the material under normal conditions Any other remark Any other remark

Any other remark QC officer/Firms name ARO/Met/RDSO Any other remark QC Officer/Firms Name ARO/Met/RDSO
Name of the Firm Offer Memo No./CMS Wooden/Steel/Concrete Sleepers ..Serial no. of crossing Contract No. . Date... .. Drawing No. RDSO/T----------------Alt. . Type 1 in BG ..Kg . Heat No. .Date of casting ... No. of castings ..

SE/TK/QAC/RDSO

ARO/Met/RDSO

Offer Memo No. 5 Date of offer (To inspect after further removal / rectification of defects & during machining operation).
1.

Offer Memo No. 6 Date of offer (To be presented after straightening )afterwards inspect by Dye Penetrant)

Offer Memo No. 7 Date of offer (To inspect finally)

Surface defects, if any, (Metallurgical). 1. Certified that no welding was done on 1. a) No appreciable defects the casting. Or b) See sketch attached 2. Certified that the defects mentioned 2. Dimensional deficiencies, if any on gross in form no. CMS-5 submitted vide dimensional checking of crossing. offer memo no. 2. a) No appreciable defects dt. .This crossing have Or been rectified fully by welding b) See sketch attached 3. Test after heat-treatment

The casting has been checked for dimensions as per tolerances specified and found to be within limits of relevant specification and drawings. CMS Crossing has been tested after straightening operation and has been found satisfactory. Components /Fittings supplied with the crossing as mentioned in the contract are tested /checked in lots and found to conform to relevant drawings and specification.

procedure as per specification T29:2000.

3.

a) Certified that the above casting has been heat treated in Batch No. in H.T. furnace No. 3. It is also certified that dimension of .. dt. . The heat treatment this crossing are within the limits of record checked and found satisfactory. relevant specification and drawing. b) Impact Bend test results. Test satisfactory Yes/No. 4. The above crossing may now be c) Hardness test TB. BHN 4. Magnetic test as per specification has released for dispatch. Casting results .BHN been carried out and found satisfactory Crossing is satisfactory in Hardness Test.Yes/NO d) The defects as shown in sketch have been 5. Radiographic examination has QC Officer/Firms Name removed by grinding/gouging and dye been conducted by Authorised agency penetrant test conducted in presence of ARO and results have been scrutinized and (Met)/RDSO and found satisfactory.

are satisfactory as per IRS-T-29 as

amended. 4. Quality of machining Checked during machining operation on plano miller/milling machine and found no unauthorized welding. Gross dimensions have QC Officer/Firms Name been found within permissible limit of relevant specifications and drawings. Certified that the test results of the above conform 6. Dye penetrant test conducted in presence of SE/QAC/RDSO at to IRS/T-29-2000 as amended following locations found satisfactory.
5. Certified that the location of defects detected and permission for welding granted by RDSO falling under IRST-29-2000 as amended have been rectified in accordance with the welding procedure laid down by RDSO in presence of ARO (Met)/QAC/RDSO. 6. Components /Fittings to be supplied with this crossing as mentioned in the contract have been tested /checked including for physical and chemical properties and found conforming to relevant drawings and specifications. Any other remark QC Officer /Firms name

a) V nose for a length of 300mm both faces & table. b) Vertical joint between finishing plane and vertical web. The crossing conforms to relevant c) Bearing plate locations specifications and drawings in all respect. d) Rectified area by welding. Hence it is accepted. It is certified that crossings has been found satisfactory Any other remark

ARO (Met) RDSO

SE/TK/QAC/RDSO SE/TK/QAC/RDSO