Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
=
+
1
0
) cos( sin
) , (
N
n
n jka
n n
e f I
Because of the symmetry, the element patterns are dependent on the element location
and have the form:
73
Chapter 8 - Conformal Microstrip Antenna Arrays
f
n
( ) , = f ) , ( n
and generally include mutual coupling and effects of ground plane curvature. The ring
array is of particular importance because it is also the basic element of cylindrical
arrays.
Figure 8.3 Circular array geometry [19].
The axial distance of the cylindrical array allows elevation pattern control and higher
directivity. Elements are more direct due to the metallic cylinder on which elements are
placed. The influence of the curved surface on the radiation pattern is examined next.
The cylindrical array can be considered to consist of a stack of identical ring arrays. The
coordinate system is shown in Figure 8.4. For simplicity the complex excitation of the
p
th
elements in the q
th
ring can be denoted by I
pq
= I(
p
,z
q
), where
p
is the angular
location of the p
th
and z
q
is the z-axis location of the q
th
ring.
74
Conformal Antenna Arrays for 3G Cellular Base Stations
Figure 8.4 Cylindrical coordinate system [18].
All elements are assumed identical, symmetrical, equally spaced, and pointed along the
radius. Thus, the azimuth element pattern can be expressed as a function of | |. The
azimuth pattern depends on the elevation angle . Assuming that the phase centre is at
the element,
( ) | |. cos cos exp ) , ( ) , ( = jkp G G
The far field is
( ) ( ) ), exp( , , jqu G I E
p
p q
pq
=
where u = kd sin and d = spacing between elements in the axial direction. A beam can
be formed in the direction by exciting all elements to add in
phase in that direction (beam co-phase excitation). The azimuth distribution depends on
the beam-pointing angle in both azimuth and elevation. Analysis can be simplified by
considering the cylindrical array pattern to be the product of a ring array pattern and a
linear array pattern. The patterns do not include the effects of mutual coupling.
0
0 = = and
75
Chapter 8 - Conformal Microstrip Antenna Arrays
Grating Lobes
A cylinder can be covered with a regular lattice but the projection in any direction
produces unequal spacing in azimuth. The element spacings in elevation direction are
uniform and so conventional grating lobe theory can be used. Azimuth spacing does not
produce high-amplitude grating lobes but the sidelobes may increase if the element
spacing is too large. Element spacing and the cylinder radius are the two factors needed
to calculate grating lobes. Amplitude tapering is typically used to produce moderately
low sidelobes. For proper pattern calculation element spacing, cylinder radius, element
pattern and amplitude taper must be included. Cylindrical arrays that are phased to
produce narrow beams tend to be more susceptible to grating lobe problems than do
comparable planar arrays. This is due to two factors: (i) the element patterns on the
sides of the active part of the array do not point in the direction of the main beam; and
(ii) it is necessary to have a large inter-element phase shift into the excitation to
compensate for curvature of the cylinder. Hence inter-element spacing must be kept
relatively small to prevent the formation of grating lobes. The book Phased Array
Antennas by R.C. Hansen presents mathematical analysis of grating lobes. The grating
lobe of the cylindrical staggered array is equal to the grating lobe of the linear array,
with spacing d, times the grating lobe of a ring array with spacing 2s (s = elevation
spacing). Figure 8.5 below shows the grating lobe height as a function of scan angle for
regular and staggered configuration and the position in elevation and azimuth of the
staggered array lobe.
Figure 8.5 Grating lobe position and height vs. scan angle [18].
76
Conformal Antenna Arrays for 3G Cellular Base Stations
The figures below show the pattern for various . The effect of staggering is easily
seen. If the rings are spaced at d = 0.72, a beam at = 30 deg gives a grating lobe at
about 60 deg. A regular array gives the grating lobe height at 11dB, which is the
difference between beams at = 30 deg and = 60 deg. For a staggered array, the
grating lobe height is the difference between the beam at = 30 deg and the grating
lobe at = 60 deg (about 28dB).
0
0
0
0
0
0
(a) 30 dB Chebyshev patterns for = 0 (b) 30 dB Chebyshev patterns for = 30
0 0
(c) 30 dB Chebyshev patterns for = 60
0
Figure 8.6 30 dB patterns for (a) = 0, (b) = 30 and (c) = 60 degrees [18].
0 0 0
Figure 8.7 below present the patterns for regular and staggered arrays at various . The
same single ring parameters are assumed as for previous Figure 8.6 in addition, 32 rings
spaced at 0.72 are used with a 30dB Chebyshev distribution.
0
The grating lobe can be reduced and elevation scan extended by reducing the azimuth or
elevation spacing of the staggered array. For example, reducing the azimuth spacing
77
Chapter 8 - Conformal Microstrip Antenna Arrays
from 0.65 to 0.5 (with d = 0.72) increases the scan angle limit from 30 deg to about
40 deg to maintain a grating lobe of 30 dB and further reduction to 0.4 allows scanning
to above 75 deg with the grating love below 40 dB. Reduction of elevation spacing
(with s = 0.65) from 0.72 to 0.6 allows scanning to above 50 deg for a grating lobe
below 40 dB.
Figure 8.7 30 dB Chebyshev patterns [18].
78
Conformal Antenna Arrays for 3G Cellular Base Stations
Scan Element Pattern
Scan element patterns of elements disposed around a cylinder can be obtained by
solving an equation for each azimuthal mode separately. Figure 8.8 shows scan element
pattern for circumferential dipoles around a cylinder of diameter (120/), with axial
dipole spacing of 0.72, and circumferential spacings of 0.5, 0.6 and 0.72. As expected
from the analogous H-plane planar array shows scan element pattern, the wider spacing
show oscillations at broadside, leading to a drop at a grating lobe angle. The drops occur
at angles smaller than those for the planar case, but are less steep.
Figure 8.8 Scan element patterns for several spacings [18].
Figure 8.9 shows scan element pattern for an array of rectangular waveguide radiators
around a cylinder of diameter (185/), with axial spacing of 0.8 and circumferential
spacing of 0.6. E-field was circumferential, with guide dimensions of 0.32 by 0.75.
This larger cylinder shows a steeper drop, more like the planar array results.
79
Chapter 8 - Conformal Microstrip Antenna Arrays
Figure 8.9 Scan element pattern [18].
Sector Arrays On Cylinders
Patterns and Directivity
In many applications such as missiles and aircraft, full azimuth scanning is not needed.
Sector arrays, where the elements occupy a sector of some angle are appropriate. When
sector angle is small the array can be designed as a planar array with minor adjustments.
However, large sectors require the examinations of all curvature effects. Figure 8.10
shows relative directivity versus sector included angle for several element pattern
variations. The directivity is the projected area times the element directivity.
80
Conformal Antenna Arrays for 3G Cellular Base Stations
Figure 8.10 Arc array directivity relative to flat array across diameter [19].
An example of an array with 0.65 spacing on a 27.4 diameter cylinder, for sector
angles of 60, 90 and 120 deg is shown in Figure 8.11. Larger projected element
spacings at large angles allow the grating lobe to increase with larger sector angle. This
lobe could be suppressed with closer element spacing of course. However the directivity
penalty cannot. From a 60 deg sector to one of 120 deg, the projected area has doubled
but directivity has increased only 1.0 dB.
Figure 8.11 Scan element patterns of arc arrays [18].
81
Chapter 8 - Conformal Microstrip Antenna Arrays
Comparison of Planar and Sector Arrays
The question often arises whether the cylindrical array makes efficient use of aperture
and hardware, in particular when compared with standard planar array approach. For
360 deg azimuth coverage, four planar arrays each scanning 90 deg, are generally used,
so the cylinder is compared with the four-sided planar configuration (assuming identical
elements). For elevation scanning and elevation pattern, the two configurations give
nearly identical results. The planar array elevation pattern is the array factor multiplied
by the elevation element pattern, while the cylindrical array elevation pattern is the
array factor multiplied by the ring array elevation pattern. The advantage of the
cylinder is that the ring array elevation pattern tend to suppress sidelobes more than
does the element pattern alone. For smaller arcs that are excited in the ring the main
beam and first few sidelobes are almost identical to the linear array results because for
small angles the curvature has a negligible effect on the phased distribution from each
element. Also, effects of element spacing become apparent only at larger angles.
Chebyshev distribution method could be used to form the desired beamwidth and
constrain the inner sidelobes of an arc array. If grating lobes are controlled, all sidelobes
will be below the inner sidelobe.
It has been calculated [R.C. Hansen] that about 92% to 100% of the elements required
for a four-sided linear array are required to obtain the equivalent ring array. There are
some disadvantages of the planar array which the cylindrical array avoids. The ring
array beam is identical for all beam positions, while the planar array beam is broader in
scanning off broadside. As the ring array is scanned by commutating the distribution, it
is always formed by a distribution which is symmetrical in phase and amplitude. This
results in superior beam pointing accuracy independent of frequency change.
Cylindrical array gives 360 deg coverage in azimuth with none of the handover
problems associated with the use of several planar arrays. In some applications these
advantages can be very important.
The cylindrical array however has some disadvantages. For scanning, the amplitude as
well as the phase must be switched in azimuth and the feeding system that results will
be more complex than that of a planar array system. The greatest disadvantage would be
82
Conformal Antenna Arrays for 3G Cellular Base Stations
that the cylindrical array cannot be physically separated as can the four planar array.
This means that the cylinder must be in position to look 360 deg, while each planar
array needs to see only 90 deg sector. More important, it means that the cylinder cannot
be tilted back to increase elevation coverage, as is common practice with the planar
arrays.
83
Conformal Antenna Arrays for 3G Cellular Base Stations
Chapter 9
Single Element Design
The design of a single layer element involves selecting the material to be used, i.e. the
substrate and conductor, calculating the approximate patch size and the width of the
feedline (dependent on desired input impedance) and simulating and optimising the
design using the Ensemble microstrip and HFSS computer-aided drawing (CAD)
software.
Overview of Ensemble CAD Software
Ensemble is a CAD package for microstrip antenna design using the full-wave moment
method technique, designed for the Windows operating systems and is produced by
Boulder Microwave Technologies. It is used to model elements and small arrays with a
high degree of accuracy and has the ability to determine all the relevant electrical
parameters for various antenna shapes, layers and array feed networks.
The graphical user interface allows an easy on-screen antenna design according to the
number of layers and material parameters specified. It is able to estimate transmission
line, quarter wave transformer and patch dimensions by specifying the resonant
frequency or impedance required.
The design can then be simulated with various simulation options provided such as s-
parameters, 2D and 3D far fields, as well as the frequency range of interest. Results are
then available in different graphical forms. The design can then be adjusted and
optimised to provide desired results and characteristics.
84
Chapter 9 - Single Element Design
Overview of High Frequency Structure Simulator (HFSS) Software
HFSS is a 3D EM simulation software for RF & wireless design which is produced by
Agilent Technologies. It was first introduced in 1990 as the first commercial software
tool to simulate complex 3D geometries. The software gained instant popularity because
it brought the power of finite element method FEM to design engineers. Since 1990,
numerous improvements have allowed open regions for antenna design, fast frequency
sweeps for wideband simulation, ferrite materials for nonreciprocal devices, and new
features for antenna design.
HFSS is an interactive software package that computes s-parameters and full-wave
fields for arbitrarily-shaped 3D passive structures. Structures are simulated in HFSS
using the finite element method (FEM) together with advanced techniques such as
automatic adaptive mesh generation and refinement, tangential vector finite elements,
and Adaptive Lanczos Pade Sweep (ALPS). An initial mesh - or subdivision of the
geometry into tetrahedral elements - is created based on the structure drawn in the CAD
package. This initial mesh is solved quickly to provide field solution information
identifying regions of high field intensity or rapid field gradients. The mesh is then
refined only where needed, saving computational resources while maximizing accuracy.
HFSS automatically computes multiple adaptive solutions until a user-defined
convergence criterion is met. Field solutions calculated from first principles accurately
predict all high-frequency behavior such as dispersion, mode conversion, and losses due
to materials and radiation. Analyzing antennas, waveguide components, RF filters and
many other structures is as simple as drawing the structure, specifying material
characteristics, and identifying ports and special surface characteristics. HFSS
automatically generates field solutions, port characteristics, and s-parameters. It is
quickly able to calculate antenna metrics such as gain, directivity, far-field pattern cuts,
far-field 3D plots, and 3dB beamwidth.
85
Conformal Antenna Arrays for 3G Cellular Base Stations
Materials
The most sensitive parameter in the estimation of antenna performance is the dielectric
constant of the substrate material. Propagation constant of an electromagnetic wave
travelling in the microstrip substrate must be accurately known as well.
Small variations in the substrate dielectric constant or dimensional changes due to
temperature fluctuations can result in frequency shift. Therefore substrates used in the
design of microstrip antennas need to be of a high quality in terms of stability in their
mechanical and electrical properties. From chapter 8 we have seen that materials with
lower dielectric constant will provide greater bandwidth, more directive and more
efficient antennas however with thinner substrates, as is the case in this design, the
bandwidth will be small.
This design will use substrate parameters from a very common substrate known as RT
Duroid 5880. Antennas for WCDMA applications will need to have substantially large
bandwidth. From Pozar [16], the requirements to increase the impedance bandwidth are
thick and low permittivity substrates. This also has the desirable qualities of high
radiation efficiency and low surface radiation. However this design will only concern
single layer microstrip design as the focus of the thesis primarily lies in effects of
curvature on conformal antenna arrays.
Hence material chosen are:
Microstrip Substrate: 62 mils RT Duroid 5880, permittivity
r
= 2.22, and
thickness h = 1.5875 mm, ounce copper cladding.
Patch Substrate: Metal ounce copper cladding, thickness = 0.017 mm and
conductivity 5.800 x 10
7
.
86
Chapter 9 - Single Element Design
Patch Size Calculation
This process provides a reasonably accurate starting point although it does not provide
the final patch dimensions. The equations have been obtained from Balanis [17] and the
values calculated refer to the dimensions illustrated in Figure 9.1.
Figure 9.1 Dimensions of a single layer element [17].
Specified parameters:
Resonant Frequency: f
r
= 2.15 GHz
Substrate Permittivity:
r
= 2.22
Substrate Thickness: h = 1.5875 mm
Calculate width of patch:
1
2
2 1
2
2
1
0 0
+
=
+
=
r r r r
f
c
f
W
where W is the width in metres and c is the free space velocity of light.
The calculated width is:
87
Conformal Antenna Arrays for 3G Cellular Base Stations
1 2 . 2
2
) 15 . 2 ( 2
3 . 0
1
2
2
1
0 0
+
=
+
=
r r
f
W
= 55.16 mm.
Calculate effective dielectric constant:
2 / 1
12 1
2
1
2
1
+
+
=
W
h
r rr
reff
Thus = 2.0742
reff
Calculate element extension length due to fringing effects:
( )
( )
|
.
|
\
|
+
|
.
|
\
|
+ +
=
8 . 0 258 . 0
264 . 0 3 . 0
) 412 . 0 (
h
W
h
W
h L
reff
reff
Thus = 0.8421 mm L
So finally the actual length of patch:
L
f
L
r r
= 2
2
1
0 0
therefore the length of the patch is = 46.758 mm. L
Ensemble Simulation and Optimisation
The single element design was put into Ensemble with the previous calculated
dimensions and the following initial dimensions:
88
Chapter 9 - Single Element Design
Width of 50 Ohm input transmission line: w = 4.92 mm
Length of 50 Ohm input transmission live: l = 26.9 mm
The transmission line was located at the edge of the patch in the centre of the width
side.
The design was then simulated for range of frequencies (typically 2.0 to 2.3 GHz) and
s-parameters were inspected. This scattering parameter is also known as return loss and
it specifies the ratio of the reflected signal to the input signal. It is usually used to
determine how well the feedline is matched relative to the antenna patch (in terms of
impedances). From this graph the impedance bandwidth can also be measured. It is
defined as being the range of frequencies for which the return loss response is below
10dB.
Figure 9.2 shows the return loss that was obtained:
Figure 9.2 Return loss for a single element.
The low return loss is due to mismatching of the feedline and the microstrip patch. A
quarter wave transformer was then used to match the feedline to the patch. This was
estimated using Ensemble. Again the estimate was not completely perfect but it gave a
89
Conformal Antenna Arrays for 3G Cellular Base Stations
good starting point for further trial and error simulations. Through trial and error
process it was clear which parameters affect the antenna characteristics. The length L of
the patch determines the resonant frequency where as the patch width W and
transmission line length determine the coupling between the transmission line and the
patch element and therefore the return loss and bandwidth.
Eventually the best return loss obtained (-44 dB) is shown in Figure 9.3 and dimensions
for this antenna element are shown in Figure 9.4.
Figure 9.3 Return loss for a single element.
Figure 9.4 Single patch dimensions for the return loss of -44 dB.
90
Chapter 9 - Single Element Design
Now that the desirable return loss was obtained using the Ensemble software the next
step was to simulate the single element using HFSS, using same patch dimensions and
parameters. When the exact same patch was simulated using HFSS the following return
loss was obtained:
Figure 9.5 Return loss obtained for the same patch using HFSS.
One logical answer as to why such a low return loss was obtained using HFSS is that
this software takes into consideration the substrate and ground plane area that need to be
specified before hand. On the other hand the Ensemble software assumes infinite
ground plane and therefore the effects of surface waves are not taken into considerations
when performing simulation calculations.
After a lengthy trial and error simulation period an acceptable return loss was obtained.
The width of the quarter wave transformer and the width of the patch were increased.
The right resonance frequency was obtained by varying the length of the patch. The size
of the substrate affected the return loss as well and it too was varied until reasonable
results were obtained.
Return loss of 23 dB was obtained at exactly 2.15 GHZ as shown in Figure 9.6.
91
Conformal Antenna Arrays for 3G Cellular Base Stations
Figure 9.6 Return loss for the optimised element in HFSS.
Using HFSS, the following dimensions gave the best return loss (-23 dB):
Microstrip Patch Length: L = 42.41 mm
Microstrip Patch Width: W = 56.7 mm
Quarter wave transformer: width = 3.142 mm,
length = 26.96 mm
Feedline: width = 4.9 mm,
length = 26 mm
The next chapter will focus on the design of a conformal array using microstrip antenna
elements with dimensions obtained in this chapter.
92
Conformal Antenna Arrays for 3G Cellular Base Stations
Chapter 10
Conformal Array Design and Simulation
The three-element conformal array was designed and simulated using the High
Frequency Structure Simulator (HFSS). Once the desired results were obtained for a
single element, each element in the array was then designed using the same dimensions
and parameters previously obtained in Chapter 9.
Due to the nature of the HFSS software, the full conformability of the array could not be
designed. Instead, in order to approximate the curvature on which elements would be
situated, elements were tilted by number of degrees from each other. Each element is
flat on its own, however once each element was tilted away from the other, the array
would form a structure that resembles a conformal array.
PC Hardware Requirements for HFSS Simulations
Due to the very complex nature in which HFSS performs its simulations and
calculations the software requires following hardware requirements:
At least 2GB of RAM
8 hours for each simulation on a computer using Pentium III 500 MHz or faster
Due to these hardware requirement the final design could only be limited to a single
three-element array instead of the fully cylindrical array with rows and columns of
antenna elements.
Design and Simulation Results
The conformal array was approximated in the following matter as shown in figure 10.1.
The middle patch of the three-element array was left horizontal while the adjacent two
93
Chapter 10 - Conformal Array Design and Simulations
elements were tilted away from the centre patch. To approximate different curvature
radii the adjacent elements were tilted by 5, 15, 25 and 35 degrees away from the centre
patch. Also to simulate the effects of element spacing on the array performance
following element spacing were used in conjunction with the patch tilting; 0.52, 0.62,
0.72, 0.82 and 0.92. This design process is illustrated in Figure 10.1. Table 10.1 to
10.5 indicate conformal array parameters such as radius and number of elements that
would be required to cover full cylinder along the circumference for 0.52, 0.62,
0.72, 0.82 and 0.92 element spacing respectively.
Figure 10.1 3-Element conformal array geometry.
Angle Number of Elements
covering full cylinder
Circumference Radius Radius in
wavelengths ()
5
o
53 3710 mm 590 mm 4.23
15
o
18 1260 mm 200 mm 1.43
25
o
11 770 mm 122 mm 0.87
35
o
8 560 mm 89 mm 0.64
Table 10.1 Conformal array parameters for 0.52 element spacing.
Angle Number of Elements
covering full cylinder
Circumference Radius Radius in
wavelengths ()
5
o
53 4346 mm 692 mm 4.96
15
o
18 1476 mm 235 mm 1.68
25
o
11 902 mm 144 mm 1.03
35
o
8 656 mm 105 mm 0.75
Table 10.2 Conformal array parameters for 0.62 element spacing.
94
Conformal Antenna Arrays for 3G Cellular Base Stations
Angle Number of Elements
covering full cylinder
Circumference Radius Radius in
wavelengths ()
5
o
53 4982 mm 793 mm 5.68
15
o
18 1692 mm 269 mm 1.93
25
o
11 1034 mm 165 mm 1.18
35
o
8 752 mm 120 mm 0.86
Table 10.3 Conformal array parameters for 0.72 element spacing.
Angle Number of Elements
covering full cylinder
Circumference Radius Radius in
wavelengths ()
5
o
53 5830 mm 928 mm 6.65
15
o
18 1980 mm 315 mm 2.26
25
o
11 1210 mm 193 mm 1.38
35
o
8 880 mm 140 mm 1.00
Table 10.4 Conformal array parameters for 0.82 element spacing.
Angle Number of Elements
covering full cylinder
Circumference Radius Radius in
wavelengths ()
5
o
53 6890 mm 1097 mm 7.86
15
o
18 2340 mm 372 mm 2.67
25
o
11 1430 mm 228 mm
35
o
8 1040 mm 166 mm 1.19
1.63
Table 10.5 Conformal array parameters for 0.92 element spacing.
95
Chapter 10 - Conformal Array Design and Simulations
Conformal Array with 0.52 Element Spacing
Planar Array:
Figure 10.2 Planar array 0.52 element spacing.
Figure 10.3 Horizontal radiation pattern. Figure 10.4 Vertical radiation pattern.
Figure 10.5 Return Loss. Figure 10.6 Insertion Loss.
96
Conformal Antenna Arrays for 3G Cellular Base Stations
5 Degree Element Shift:
Figure 10.7 Conformal array (Radius 4.23 and 0.52 element spacing).
Figure 10.8 Horizontal radiation pattern. Figure 10.9 Vertical radiation pattern.
Figure 10.10 Return Loss. Figure 10.11 Insertion Loss.
97
Chapter 10 - Conformal Array Design and Simulations
15 Degree Element Shift:
Figure 10.12 Conformal array (Radius 1.43 and 0.52 element spacing).
Figure 10.13 Horizontal radiation pattern. Figure 10.14 Vertical radiation pattern.
Figure 10.15 Return Loss. Figure 10.16 Insertion Loss.
98
Conformal Antenna Arrays for 3G Cellular Base Stations
25 Degree Element Shift:
Figure 10.17 Conformal array (Radius 0.87 and 0.52 element spacing).
Figure 10.18 Horizontal radiation pattern. Figure 10.19 Vertical radiation pattern.
Figure 10.20 Return Loss. Figure 10.21 Insertion Loss.
99
Chapter 10 - Conformal Array Design and Simulations
35 Degree Element Shift:
Figure 10.22 Conformal array (Radius 0.64 and 0.52 element spacing).
Figure 10.23 Horizontal radiation pattern. Figure 10.24 Vertical radiation pattern.
Figure 10.25 Return Loss. Figure 10.26 Insertion Loss.
100
Conformal Antenna Arrays for 3G Cellular Base Stations
Conformal Array with 0.62 Element Spacing
Planar Array:
Figure 10.27 Planar array 0.62 element spacing.
Figure 10.28 Horizontal radiation pattern. Figure 10.29 Vertical radiation pattern.
Figure 10.30 Return Loss. Figure 10.31 Insertion Loss.
101
Chapter 10 - Conformal Array Design and Simulations
5 Degree Element Shift:
Figure 10.32 Conformal array (Radius 4.96 and 0.62 element spacing).
Figure 10.33 Horizontal radiation pattern. Figure 10.34 Vertical radiation pattern.
Figure 10.35 Return Loss. Figure 10.36 Insertion Loss.
102
Conformal Antenna Arrays for 3G Cellular Base Stations
15 Degree Element Shift:
Figure 10.37 Conformal array (Radius 1.68 and 0.62 element spacing).
Figure 10.38 Horizontal radiation pattern. Figure 10.39 Vertical radiation pattern.
Figure 10.40 Return Loss. Figure 10.41 Insertion Loss.
103
Chapter 10 - Conformal Array Design and Simulations
25 Degree Element Shift:
Figure 10.42 Conformal array (Radius 1.03 and 0.62 element spacing).
Figure 10.43 Horizontal radiation pattern. Figure 10.44 Vertical radiation pattern.
Figure 10.45 Return Loss Figure 10.46 Insertion Loss
104
Conformal Antenna Arrays for 3G Cellular Base Stations
35 Degree Element Shift:
Figure 10.47 Conformal array (Radius 0.75 and 0.62 element spacing).
Figure 10.48 Horizontal radiation pattern Figure 10.49 Vertical radiation pattern
Figure 10.50 Return Loss. Figure 10.51 Insertion Loss.
105
Chapter 10 - Conformal Array Design and Simulations
Conformal Array with 0.72 Element Spacing
Planar Array:
Figure 10.52 Planar array 0.72 element spacing.
Figure 10.53 Horizontal radiation pattern. Figure 10.54 Vertical radiation pattern.
Figure 10.55 Return Loss. Figure 10.56 Insertion Loss.
106
Conformal Antenna Arrays for 3G Cellular Base Stations
5 Degree Element Shift:
Figure 10.57 Conformal array (Radius 5.68 and 0.72 element spacing).
Figure 10.58 Horizontal radiation pattern. Figure 10.59 Vertical radiation pattern.
Figure 10.60 Return Loss. Figure 10.61 Insertion Loss.
107
Chapter 10 - Conformal Array Design and Simulations
15 Degree Element Shift:
Figure 10.62 Conformal array (Radius 1.93 and 0.72 element spacing).
Figure 10.63 Horizontal radiation pattern. Figure 10.64 Vertical radiation pattern.
Figure 10.65 Return Loss. Figure 10.66 Insertion Loss.
108
Conformal Antenna Arrays for 3G Cellular Base Stations
25 Degree Element Shift:
Figure 10.67 Conformal array (Radius 1.18 and 0.72 element spacing).
Figure 10.68 Horizontal radiation pattern. Figure 10.69 Vertical radiation pattern.
Figure 10.70 Return Loss. Figure 10.71 Insertion Loss.
109
Chapter 10 - Conformal Array Design and Simulations
35 Degree Element Shift:
Figure 10.72 Conformal array (Radius 0.86 and 0.72 element spacing).
Figure 10.73 Horizontal radiation pattern. Figure 10.74 Vertical radiation pattern.
Figure 10.75 Return Loss. Figure 10.76 Insertion Loss.
110
Conformal Antenna Arrays for 3G Cellular Base Stations
Conformal Array with 0.82 Element Spacing
Planar Array:
Figure 10.77 Planar array 0.82 element spacing.
Figure 10.78 Horizontal radiation pattern. Figure 10.79 Vertical radiation pattern.
Figure 10.80 Return Loss. Figure 10.81 Insertion Loss.
111
Chapter 10 - Conformal Array Design and Simulations
5 Degree Element Shift:
Figure 10.82 Conformal array (Radius 6.65 and 0.82 element spacing).
Figure 10.83 Horizontal radiation pattern. Figure 10.84 Vertical radiation pattern.
Figure 10.85 Return Loss. Figure 10.86 Insertion Loss.
112
Conformal Antenna Arrays for 3G Cellular Base Stations
15 Degree Element Shift:
Figure 10.87 Conformal array (Radius 2.26 and 0.82 element spacing).
Figure 10.88 Horizontal radiation pattern. Figure 10.89 Vertical radiation pattern.
Figure 10.90 Return Loss. Figure 10.91 Insertion Loss.
113
Chapter 10 - Conformal Array Design and Simulations
25 Degree Element Shift:
Figure 10.92 Conformal array (Radius 1.38 and 0.82 element spacing).
Figure 10.93 Horizontal radiation pattern. Figure 10.94 Vertical radiation pattern.
Figure 10.95 Return Loss. Figure 10.96 Insertion Loss.
114
Conformal Antenna Arrays for 3G Cellular Base Stations
35 Degree Element Shift:
Figure 10.97 Conformal array (Radius 1.00 and 0.82 element spacing).
Figure 10.98 Horizontal radiation pattern. Figure 10.99 Vertical radiation pattern.
Figure 10.100 Return Loss. Figure 10.101 Insertion Loss.
115
Chapter 10 - Conformal Array Design and Simulations
Conformal Array with 0.92 Element Spacing
Planar Array :
Figure 10.102 Planar array 0.92 element spacing.
Figure 10.103 Horizontal radiation pattern. Figure 10.104 Vertical radiation pattern.
Figure 10.105 Return Loss. Figure 10.106 Insertion Loss.
116
Conformal Antenna Arrays for 3G Cellular Base Stations
5 Degree Element Shift:
Figure 10.107 Conformal array (Radius 7.86 and 0.92 element spacing).
Figure 10.108 Horizontal radiation pattern. Figure 10.109 Vertical radiation pattern.
Figure 10.110 Return Loss. Figure 10.111 Insertion Loss.
117
Chapter 10 - Conformal Array Design and Simulations
15 Degree Element Shift:
Figure 10.112 Conformal array (Radius 2.67 and 0.92 element spacing).
Figure 10.113 Horizontal radiation pattern. Figure 10.114 Vertical radiation pattern.
Figure 10.115 Return Loss. Figure 10.116 Insertion Loss.
118
Conformal Antenna Arrays for 3G Cellular Base Stations
25 Degree Element Shift:
Figure 10.117 Conformal array (Radius 1.63 and 0.92 element spacing).
Figure 10.118 Horizontal radiation pattern. Figure 10.119 Vertical radiation pattern.
Figure 10.120 Return Loss. Figure 10.121 Insertion Loss.
119
Chapter 10 - Conformal Array Design and Simulations
35 Degree Element Shift:
Figure 10.122 Conformal array (Radius 1.19 and 0.92 element spacing).
Figure 10.123 Horizontal radiation pattern. Figure 10.124 Vertical radiation pattern.
Figure 10.125 Return Loss. Figure 10.126 Insertion Loss.
120
Conformal Antenna Arrays for 3G Cellular Base Stations
Tabulated Results of Simulations
Array
Configuration
Return Loss
(dB)
Insertion Loss
(Patch 2 - Patch 1) dB
Insertion Loss
(Patch 2 - Patch 3) dB
Planar -21 -28 -55
5
o
-13 -25 -50
15
o
-12 -28 -55
25
o
-12 and -8 -28 -50
35
o
-12 and -8 -28 -50
Table 10.6 Simulation results of an array with 0.52 element spacing.
Array
Configuration
Return Loss
(dB)
Insertion Loss
(Patch 2 - Patch 1) dB
Insertion Loss
(Patch 2 - Patch 3) dB
Planar -21 -38 -65
5
o
-14 -35 -63
15
o
-12 and -8 -33 -60
25
o
-10 and -7 -31 -55
35
o
-10 and -7 -30 -50
Table 10.7 Simulation results of an array with 0.62 element spacing.
Array
Configuration
Return Loss
(dB)
Insertion Loss
(Patch 2 - Patch 1) dB
Insertion Loss
(Patch 2 - Patch 3) dB
Planar -21 -50 -80
5
o
-14 -45 -75
15
o
-13 and -8 -42 -62
25
o
-12 and -6 -40 -60
35
o
-11 and -6 -40 -58
Table 10.8 Simulation results of an array with 0.72 element spacing.
Array
Configuration
Return Loss
(dB)
Insertion Loss
(Patch 2 - Patch 1) dB
Insertion Loss
(Patch 2 - Patch 3) dB
Planar -21 -65 -80
5
o
-14 -62 -66
15
o
-12 and -8 -58 -58
25
o
-12 and -7 -55 -55
35
o
-11 and -6 -55 -55
Table 10.9 Simulation results of an array with 0.82 element spacing.
121
Chapter 10 - Conformal Array Design and Simulations
Array
Configuration
Return Loss
(dB)
Insertion Loss
(Patch 2 - Patch 1) dB
Insertion Loss
(Patch 2 - Patch 3) dB
Planar -20 -70 -90
5
o
-12 -70 -90
15
o
-12 and -9 -60 -70
25
o
-12 and -7 -60 -70
35
o
-12 and -6 -56 -66
Table 10.10 Simulation results of an array with 0.92 element spacing.
122
Conformal Antenna Arrays for 3G Cellular Base Stations
Chapter 11
Discussion of Results
This chapter gives a detailed analysis of the results obtained from simulations carried
out using HFSS. Comparisons will be made with reference to the theoretical aspects
linked to the results and any discrepancies noted will be discussed and commented.
As explained in earlier chapter, simulations were limited due to the extensive hardware
requirements of the software. Due to these PC hardware requirements the size of the
design had to be restricted to three-element array with minimal physical size as
possible. As such, each simulation would take approximately 8 hours to complete and in
total 25 final simulations were performed. Note that the PC in the thesis lab did not have
the required hardware to support the full calculation of a simulation and therefore all
simulations were performed on a Super Computer with the help of the postgraduate
student Eddie Tsai who had access to the computer.
Radiation Pattern Results
The conformal array and different curvature radii was approximated by adjusting the
angle of tilting of the left and right element from the center element. Additionally the
array was simulated under different element spacing (ie. 0.52, 0.62, 0.72, 0.82 and
0.92). Firstly the effect of curvature then the effect of element spacing on the radiation
pattern will be discussed.
Firstly the planar array was simulated in order to obtain the basis for comparison to the
conformal array. As expected the three-element array has a major lobe and two minor
side lobes on each side. The radiation pattern in azimuth direction is affected mostly. As
the curvature was increased, i.e. as the tilting angle was increased, the radiation pattern
suffered from increased level of side lobes. When the tilting angle is increased by 10
123
Chapter 11 - Discussion of Results
degrees, which is equivalent in reducing the curvature radius by few wavelengths total
deformation in the radiation pattern was observed. In cases for large angles such as 15
o
,
25
o
and 35
o
representing curvature radius of only 1-3 wavelengths the radiation pattern
suffered complete degradation when compared to the planar array radiation pattern. The
sidelobes and the major lobe combine into a large single lobe representing an almost
omni-directional radiation pattern. The radiation pattern in elevation direction does not
change much with the change in curvature. It preserves its shape for all simulated
curvature radii.
The element spacing was varied between 0.52 and 0.92 in each simulation. As the
element spacing is increased the radiation pattern suffered from larger sidelobes and in
some cases major grating lobes. The best results were obtained for the array with 0.62
and 0.72 element spacing. Note that some radiation patterns are unclear in their shape
and do not offer the full insight into the effects of various element spacing. It is also
observed that back lobes are present for larger element spacing.
Return Loss Results
Even tough theory suggests that the return loss of each microstrip patch should not be
affected by the element spacing or curvature radii, it is discussed here because
simulations performed show some discrepancies. It can be seen from the tables of
results in chapter 10 that the return loss decreased as the curvature radius was
decreased. However it does not change as the element spacing is increased. This may be
due to an error in simulation or in design of the array. For the planar array the return
loss obtained was 21 dB which is almost the value obtained for the single element
microstrip patch. This return loss level is an acceptable level in most literatures. As the
curvature is increased the return loss dropped to about -12 dB and in most cases the
return loss for the other element dropped to about -8 dB. The reason for this sort of
effect on the return loss is not yet clear. It is most likely due to some fault in the design
of the array in HFSS however it is a single layer microstrip array which is one of the
most simplest designs.
124
Conformal Antenna Arrays for 3G Cellular Base Stations
Insertion Loss Results
The insertion loss is the measure of the effect of each element on each other in an array.
Thus it can be used to indicate the level of mutual coupling in the array. As the theory
suggest the smaller the element spacing in the antenna array the greater the level of
mutual coupling. This is also confirmed from the simulations performed.
From tables of results in chapter 10 the insertion loss between Patch 2 and Patch 3 and
the insertion loss between Patch 2 and Patch 1 is measured. The results show that
insertion loss between Patch 2 and Patch 1 is always greater than the insertion loss
between Patch 2 and Patch 3. As elements are spaced exactly same distance from the
center patch (Patch 1) this result was not expected. However the effect of the element
spacing on mutual coupling is still evident. As shown in tables of results in chapter 10
the insertion loss decreased by approximately 10 dB for every wavelength increase in
element spacing. At 0.52 element spacing the insertion loss is about -28 dB and it
decreased to about -70 dB for element spacing of 0.92.
However, as the curvature radius was decreased the level of mutual coupling increased.
This is clearly evident if the insertion loss of the planar array is compared to the
conformal array. In most cases the level of insertion loss increased by maximum of 10
dB for maximum decrease in curvature radius. As the curvature radius was slowly
decremented the level of insertion loss rose only by few dB.
125
Conformal Antenna Arrays for 3G Cellular Base Stations
Chapter 12
Conclusion and Future Developments
Summary
This section summarizes the work carried out in this thesis. Cylindrical conformal array
with three elements is studied, designed and simulated using the HFSS simulation
software. The effects of various curvature radii and different element spacing on the
radiation pattern and mutual coupling are studied.
Most optimal radiation patterns are obtained for element spacing of 0.62 and 0.72.
The best results were obtained for curvature radius of 4 or greater however smaller
radii were also simulated to show the effect of larger curvatures. The result shows that
the resonant frequency is not affected by curvature however the radiation patterns are
significantly affected. The radiation pattern in the elevation direction is strongly
dependant on the cylinder radius but much less so in the azimuthal direction. The high
level of side lobes is present for smaller curvature radii. It also shows that the array
exhibits high sidelobes that can be reduced by making the element spacing smaller than
is necessary with the planar array. To achieve smooth slopes in the main beam, unlike in
planar arrays, the excitation and phase distribution should be kept non-uniform along
the curvature. The level of mutual coupling increases slightly with decrease in curvature
radius. However the level of insertion loss is minimum for larger element spacing and
can be neglected. The return loss decreases as the curvature radius is decreased however
this effect may be due to some array design issues in HFSS software.
126
Chapter 12 - Conclusion and Future Developments
Future Work
Topics that can be explored or expanded following this thesis are listed as follows:
Design of a larger conformal array with more than three elements
Design of a complete cylindrical array with several arrays in both horizontal and
vertical direction
Study of various curvatures bigger than 3 in radius and several element spacing
to find the optimal configuration
Use of stacked mictrostrip patch, aperture stacked, aperture coupled approach or
any other approach to provide much wider bandwidth, as single layer microstrip
patch does not provide enough bandwidth required for next generation mobile
communication systems
Manufacture of such an array that includes both beam forming and beam
steering electronics and possible smart antenna system as it is a vital feature for
next generation mobile base station antennas
Design of cylindrical array with multiband operation capability as next
generation cellular systems require antennas that work in both 2G and 3G
spectral bands so in order to reduce the number of antennas on base stations
The system can then be put into tests in an actual cellular environment to
determine the feasibility of such an employment in current and future cellular
systems
127
Conformal Antenna Arrays for 3G Cellular Base Stations
Conclusion
This thesis presents background on current antennas used in mobile communication
systems and fundamental concepts of conformal antenna arrays. As next generation of
mobile communication systems migrate into a new spectral band they will require new
types of mobile base station antennas that will operate in that spectrum and be able to
replace current base station antennas. Cylindrical antenna arrays are prospective
candidates for the next generation mobile communications systems and cellular base
stations due to their full field of view advantage. However in order to design such new
types of antennas there are few issues that should be taken into consideration when
designing and manufacturing such antennas. Firstly the curvature of the cylindrical
array affects the radiation pattern of the antenna and the optimal radius should be found
depending on the application on hand. Secondly the spacing between elements both in
horizontal and vertical direction (assuming full cylindrical array design) is very
important to consider as it affects the level of mutual coupling in the array. Simulations
were conducted to measure and study the effects of curvature of conformal arrays on the
radiation pattern. Additionally the effects of element spacing hence mutual coupling are
simultaneously studied.
In conclusion this thesis has provided an insight into conformal antenna arrays and will
form a platform for researchers working towards realizing the implementation of
conformal arrays in current and future cellular systems.
128
Bibliography
Bibliography
[1] P. Kabacik, Investigations into Advanced Concepts of Terminal and Base-
Station Antennas, IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine, Vol. 43, No. 4,
August 2001, pp.160-168
[2] P. Kabacik and M. Bialkowski, Cylindrical Antenna Arrays and their
Applications in Wireless Communication Systems, personally received paper
from Prof. Marek E. Bialkowski, Department of Information Technology and
Electrical Engineering, University of Queensland, Australia, 2002
[3] K. Wong and G. Hsieh, Curvature Effects on the Radiation Pattern of
Cylindrical Microstrip Arrays Microwave and Optical Technology Letters,
Vol. 18, No. 3, June 20 1998, pp. 206-209
[4] D. Loffler, W. Wiesbeck and B. Johanisson, Conformal Aperture Coupled
Microstrip Phased Array on a Cylindrical Surface IEEE Antennas and
Propagation Society International Symposium, Piscataway NJ, USA, Vol. 2,
1999, pp. 882-885
[5] S. Raffaelli, Z. Sipus and P. Kildal, Effect of Element Spacing and Curvature
on the Radiation Patterns of Patch Antenna Arrays mounted on Cylindrical
Multilayer Structures IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International
Symposium, Piscataway NJ, USA, Vol.4, 1999, pp. 2474-2477
[6] K.L. Wong and G. B. Hsieh Radiation Characteristics of Cylindrical
Microstrip Arrays , IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International
Symposium, Piscataway NJ, USA, Vol.4, 1999, pp. 2760-2763
[7] J.s. Dahele, K.M. Luk, K.F. Lee and R.J. Mitchell, Theoretical and
Experimental Studies of the Cylindrical-Rectangular Microstrip Patch Antenna
International-Journal-of-Electronics, Vol. 68, no.3, March 1990, p.431-438
129
Bibliography
[8] K.M. Luk, K.F. Lee and J.S. Dahele, Analysis of the Cylindrical-Rectangular
Patch Antenna, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Vol. 37, no.
2, February 1989, pp. 143-147
[9] S.Y. Ke and K.L. Wong, Cross-Polarization Characteristics of Rectangular
Microstrip Patch Antennas on a Cylindrical Surface, Microwave-and-Optical-
Technology-Letters, Vol. 6, No. 16, December 20, 1993, pp.911-914
[10] I. Jayakumar, R. Garg, B.K. Sarap and B. Lal, A Conformal Cylindrical
Microstrip Array for Producing Omnidirectional Radiation Pattern, IEEE-
Transactions-on-Antennas-and-Propagation, Vol.AP-34, no.10, October 1986,
pp.1258-1261
[11] L. Josefsson and P. Persson, Conformal Array Synthesis Including Mutual
Coupling, Electronics-Letters, Vol. 35, no. 8, April 15, 1999, pp.625-627
[12] V. Voipio, P. Vainikainen and A. Toropainen, Optimal Cylindrical Antenna
Arrays, Proceedings of the 2000 International Symposium on Antennas and
Propagation (ISAP2000), IEICE of Japan, Tokyo, Japan, Vol. 3, 2000, pp. 895-
898
[13] V. Voipio and P. Vainikainen, Narrowbeam Cylindrical Antenna Array with
Sparse Antenna Spacing, 48
th
IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, IEEE,
New York NY, USA, Vol. 1, 1998, pp. 465-469
[14] J. Yang, B. Lindmark and P. Kildal, Studies of Cylindrical Base Station
Antennas for Future Communication Systems by Using G2DMULT,
Microwave-and-Optical-Technology-Letters, Vol. 32, No. 2, January 20, 2002,
pp. 108-112
[15] L.C. Godara, Handbook of Antennas in Wireless Communications, CRC Press,
Boca Raton, 2002.
130
Bibliography
[16] D. M. Pozar, D. H. Schaubert, Microstrip Antennas : The Analysis and Design of
Microstrip Antennas and Arrays, Institute of Electrical and Electronics
Engineers, New York, 1995.
[17] C.A. Balanis, Antenna Theory: Analysis and Design, 2nd Edition, John Wiley &
Sons, New York, 1997.
[18] R.C. Hansen, Phased Array Antennas, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1998.
[19] Robert J. Mailloux, Phased Array Antenna Handbook, Artech House, Boston
1994.
[20] K. Fujimoto, J.R. James, Mobile Antenna Systems Handbook, Artech House,
Boston, 1994.
[21] H. Holma and A. Toskala, WCDMA for UMTS: Radio Access for Third
Generation Mobile Communications, Revised Edition, John Wiley & Sons, New
York, 2001.
[22] T.S. Rappaport, Wireless Communications: Principles & Practice, Prentice Hall,
Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, 1999.
[23] C. Smith, D. Collins, 3G Wireless Networks, McGraw-Hill, New York, 2002.
[24] L. Harte, R. Kikta, R. Levine, 3G Wireless Demystified, McGraw-Hill, New
York, 2002.
[25] N.J. Boucher, The Cellular Radio Handbook: A Reference For Cellular System
Operation, 4th edition, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2001.
[26] www.GSMworld.com, www.GSMmobile.com
[27] R.C. Johnson, Antenna Engineering Handbook, 3
rd
edition, McGraw-Hill Inc,
New York, 1993
131
Bibliography
[28] D. Loffler, F. Rostan and W. Wiesbeck Conformal Microstrip Patch Array for
SDMA Applications IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International
Symposium, AP-S 97, Montreal Canada, July 13-18, 1997, pp. 1533-1536.
[29] D. Loffler, W. Wiesbeck and B. Johanisson, Conformal Aperture Coupled
Microstrip Phased Array on a Cylindrical Surface IEEE Antennas and
Propagation Society International Symposium, Piscataway NJ, USA, Vol. 2,
1999, pp. 882-885.
[30] R. Prasad, W. Mohr, W. Konhuser, Third Generation Mobile Communication
Systems Artech House, Boston, 2000.
[31] S. Faruque, Cellular Mobile Systems Engineering, Artech House, Boston, 1996.
[32] T. Ojanper, R. Prasad, Wideband CDMA for Third Generation Mobile
Communications, Artech House, Boston, 1998.
[33] Qi Bi, G.I. Zysman, H. Menkes, Wireless Mobile Communications at the Start
of the 21
st
Century, IEEE Communication Magazine, January 2001, pp.110
115.
[34] L. Jorguseski, E. Fledderus, J. Farserotu, R. Prasad, Radio Resource Allocation
in Third-Generation Mobile Communication Systems, IEEE Communication
Magazine, February 2001, pp.117-123.
[35] S. Dixit, Y. Guo, Z. Antoniou, Resource Management and Quality of Service in
Third-Generation Wireless Networks, IEEE Communication Magazine,
February 2001, pp.125-133.
[36] M. Dinis, J. Fernandes, Provision of Sufficient Transmission Capacity for
Broadband Mobile Multimedia: A Step Toward 4G, IEEE Communication
Magazine, August 2001, pp. 46-54.
132
Bibliography
[37] M. Frodigh, S. Parkvall, C. Roobol, P. Johansson, P. Larsson, Future-
Generation Wireless Networks, IEEE Communication Magazine, October
2001, pp. 10-17.
[38] T. Otsu, I. Okajima, N. Umeda, Y. Yamao, Network Architecture for Mobile
Communications Systems Beyond IMT-2000, IEEE Communication
Magazine, October 2001, pp. 31-37.
[39] B. Melis, G. Romano, UMTS W-CDMA: Evalutaion of Radio Performance By
Means of Link Level Simulations, IEEE Communication Magazine, June 2000,
pp. 42-49.
[40] J. Chuang, N. Sollenberger, Beyond 3G: Wideband Wireless Data Access
Based on OFDM and Dynamic Packet Assignment, IEEE Communication
Magazine, July 2000, pp. 78-87.
[41] J.F. Hubner, D. Weiler, H. Brand, UMTS, the Mobile Multimedia Vision for
IMT-2000: A Focus on Standardization, IEEE Communication Magazine,
September 2000, pp. 129-136.
[42] R. Jana, S. Dey, 3G Wireless Capacity Optimization for Widely Spaced
Antenna Arrays, IEEE Communication Magazine, December 2000, pp.32-35.
[43] M. Haardt, W. Mohr, The Complete Solution for Third-Generation Wireless
Communications: Two Modes on Air, One Winning Strategy, IEEE
Communication Magazine, December 2000, pp.18-24.
[44] W. Mohr, W. Konhauser, Access Network Evolution Beyond Third Generation
Mobile Communications, IEEE Communication Magazine, December 2000,
pp. 122-133.
[45] S. Ohmori, Y. Yamao, N. Nakajima, The Future Generations of Mobile
Communications Based on Broadband Access Technologies, IEEE
Communication Magazine, December 2000, pp.134-142.
133
Bibliography
[46] M. Sawahashi, K. Higuchi, S. Tanaka, F. Adachi, Enhanced Wireless Access
Technologies and Experiments for W-CDMA Communications, IEEE
Communication Magazine, December 2000, pp. 6-16.
134