Florian Ebeling.

The Secret History of Hermes Trismegistus: Hermeticism from Ancient to Modern Times Author(s): Christopher I Lehrich Source: Renaissance Quarterly, Vol. 61, No. 2 (Summer 2008), pp. 643-645 Published by: The University of Chicago Press on behalf of the Renaissance Society of America Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1353/ren.0.0074 . Accessed: 26/04/2011 18:16
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at . http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=ucpress. . Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.

The University of Chicago Press and Renaissance Society of America are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Renaissance Quarterly.

http://www.jstor.org

R E V IE WS

643

Florian Ebeling. The Secret History of Hermes Trismegistus: Hermeticism from Ancient to Modern Times.
Trans. David Lorton. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2007. xiii + 158 pp. index. gloss. chron. bibl. $29.95. ISBN: 9780801445460.

Hermeticism is one of those tricky subjects whose history requires periodic rewriting. Unfortunately, the difficulty arises not only from the considerable corpus of Hermetic material but also from various scholarly and semi-scholarly controversies that continually confuse matters. In The Secret History of Hermes Trismegistus, Florian Ebeling sets out to survey primary sources, along the way correcting or clarifying a number of longstanding historiographical issues. Ebelings slim volume is an excellent introduction to a complex and contested field. Rich with descriptive material, covering a generous chronological and textual range, the book is fascinating for specialists and will provide a firm foundation for

644

R E N A IS S A N CE Q U A R T ERLY

newcomers. Ebeling begins in Egypt itself, moves steadily through Greco-Roman, medieval, and early modern texts (which last dominate the book), then continues with a rapid sweep through the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, and a concluding nod to Julius Evolas and Umberto Ecos wildly different uses of Hermeticism in the twentieth century. Most of the work consists of summary discussions of exemplary texts and thinkers, with some small contextual setup. As an example, chapter 3, Renaissance, begins by framing the texts in terms of tradition or rediscovery. Ebeling then examines Ficino, Pico, and briefly Francesco Patrizi, Annibale Rosselli, and Jacques Lefvre dEtaples. Next he presents contemporary alchemo-Paracelsism, surveying Christoph Balduff, Paracelsus himself, Joachim Tancke, and Benedictus Figulus. Finally, we come to religious Hermeticism, encountering Sebastian Franck, Philippe de Mornay, and the Occulta Philosophia attributed to Basilius Valentinus. The balance between coverage and close reading is perhaps indicated by the fact that the whole chapter is thirty-two pages. In his forward, the distinguished Egyptologist Jan Assmann helpfully pinpoints the most crucial contribution of this volume: Ebeling demonstrates that by the early modern period, there were really two different forms of Hermeticism, and that they rarely overlapped in any clear or consistent fashion. Likely bestknown to most Renaissance Quarterly readers is the Hermeticism stemming from Ficinos translations. But the alchemical Hermeticism that influenced Paracelsus was very much an alternative tradition differing in both intellectual content and foundational texts. Where the Ficinian lineage looked to the Corpus Hermeticum, including both the Greek texts Ficino translated and also the Latin Asclepius, the alchemists traced a genealogy to the Emerald Tablet (Tabula Smaragdina) and a number of so-called practical Hermetic texts, minimally intersecting the Corpus Hermeticum. Because modern scholars have rarely recognized that they are dealing with two different traditions to be fair, most early modern and later occult thinkers have not made the distinction either there has been sharp disagreement about the nature of Hermeticism as an intellectual movement. Ebeling argues, in essence, that this is because there was no single such movement. Unfortunately, the book largely omits detailed coverage of historiographical controversies, making it somewhat difficult for the nonspecialist to distinguish new information from stock survey. While this absence keeps the volume accessible, it does weaken its contribution. Ebeling clearly knows his material extraordinarily well, and there are glimpses of a clear analytical voice, but on the whole he backs away from development in favor of coverage. This is rather a pity: the confusions common to the field are only partly overcome by reformulating the basis of study. A strong approach to argumentation would go a long way toward situating Hermeticisms in their several intellectual and cultural contexts. One misses, for example, a careful analysis of how and why the two main strands of early modern Hermeticism did and did not come into contact, given the interest in alchemy displayed by thinkers directly in the lineage of Ficino and Pico. Ultimately the question about Hermeticism is not what it was, or if it was, but rather what

R E V IE WS

645

difference it made and for whom. Ebelings book gives us a new, corrected position from which to start asking such questions, but only hints at possible answers. All told, the strengths and limits of the book make it of real classroom value in an upper-level seminar. In any course that might consider Frances Yates, for example, Ebelings work should admirably correct, clarify, and focus discussion. More importantly, however, no serious scholarship that touches on Hermeticism can afford to be ignorant of this book, without which we are liable to fall back into old, ill-informed mysteries.

CHRISTOPHER I. LEHRICH
Boston University